本研究以 Peter Grant（2012）的社會變革理論中的邏輯模式，結合近十年來日益成熟的契約理論不完全情境的文獻探討，在嘗試產生國際社會影響力的個案研究中，針對多方合作過程中的認知差異、口語表達語境的差異作為研究問題，經本研究以邏輯模式分析歸納後發現，初創期計劃除了概念驗證的實踐，風險與影響力之間的權衡與發展空間，是最重要的評估要素。
在建構相同期望的社會秩序與制度建立過程中，每個人在不同的領域所形成的社會經驗，都是協作中的重要基礎；發展期計劃具備較多元的營運策略空間，在合作與協力上更加側重於結果與績效的社會交換。
本次研究將個案另外對照影響力投資的相關文獻，並沒有發現到能夠明確對照的理論模型，推測主因為國內法人與團體的法律規範較為單純，亦無稅制上的獎勵政策模型，使得台灣在相關理論發展適用性不足。

This research was mainly based on the theory of change with logic model by Peter Grant (2012), and the literature review of the theory of incomplete contract. The main issue of the case study under this research concerning international social impact focused on the differences between oral expression and cognitive of multilateral parties.
This research concluded that, for the early-stage programs, which were built on the proof of concept regarding the logical model, the key to balance between risks and influence is the attitude of embracing innovation and challenges, which is the cornerstone for facing unknowns and uncertainties.
During the development of social orders and systems that are under the same expectations, one of the key foundations of collaboration is the social experiences received by each people from different fields. Programs in the development phase would be with more diversified operating strategies and focus more on the social exchange of outcomes and performance in cooperation and collaboration.
With that being said, from the comparison between the relevant literature about impact investment and the case, no theoretical model could be clearly references. The reason of such result may be that the regulations applicable to domestic legal person or organizations are relatively unsophisticated, such as there is no incentive policy model in terms of tax regime. Therefore, the development of relevant theories remains insufficient for Taiwan cases.

壹、中文部分
王瑞賢（譯）（2007）。階級、符碼與控制-教育傳遞理論之建構（Basil Bernstein原著）。臺北：聯經出版。
吳舜文（2019）。書評：成本效益分析之變革：從政治實務觀點探討成本與效益議題。公共行政學報，(57)，137-144。
李芳齡（譯）（2019）。專案管理革命（原著Antonio Nieto-Rodriguez）。臺北：天下文化。
胡至沛（2001）。新制度主義的檢視與反思。中國行政評論, 11(1)，145-162。
國家發展委員會（2021）。計畫方案名稱。資料引自：https://www.ndc.gov.tw/News6.aspx?n=EF7F4D028500547B&sms=5BB787D2864A8305。最後瀏覽時間：2021年3月17日
張庭（2016）。社會政策與社會立法。臺北：志光教育文化出版社。
郭昱瑩（2007）。成本效益分析。臺北：華泰文化。
陳育含（譯）（2010）。訪談研究法（Steinar Kvale原著）。新北：韋伯文化國際。
陳定銘（2015）。臺灣社會企業影響力指標之研究。科技部104年度專題研究計畫成果報告。
陳敦源, & 張世杰. (2010). 公私協力夥伴關係的弔詭. 文官制度季刊, 第二卷第三期, 17-71.
曾冠球（2019）。不完全契約與夥伴關係-促進民間參與公共建設個案之研究。臺灣民主季刊, 16(3)， 59-112。
溫秀英、余曉靜、文羽苹（譯）（2016）。公司、合約與財務結構（Oliver Hart原著）。臺北：聯經出版。
葉啟源（2018）。方案規劃與服務評鑑（二版）。臺北：雙葉書廊。
葉崇揚、古允文（2017）。從生產性福利體制到社會投資福利國家：臺灣與韓國的比較。社會政策與社會工作學刊，21(1)。
葉肅科（2017）。社會經濟與社會福利：社會投資觀點的檢視與省思。社區發展，第160期，95-110。
劉瑞華（譯）（2016）。經濟史的結構與變遷（Douglass Cecil North 原著）。臺北：聯經出版。
劉瑞華（譯）（2017）。制度、制度變遷與經濟成就（Douglass Cecil North原著）。臺北：聯經出版。
潘淑滿（2003）。質性研究：理論與應用。臺北：心理。
鄭勝分（2016）。補助或投資？政策工具對社會企業發展之影響。行政暨政策學報，62，127-157。
鄭勝分（2021）。社會投資對社會企業發展之影響：歷史制度論的觀點。科技部110年度專題研究計畫成果報告。

貳、英文部分
Berliner, P., & Spruill, V. N. (2013). Community Foundation Field Guide to Impact Investing. Mission Investors Exchange. Retrieved September 01, 2013 from https://missioninvestors.org/sites/default/files/resources/Community%20Foundation%20Field%20Guide%20to%20Impact%20Investing.pdf (accessed on 25 May 2021)
Bolton, P., & Dewatripont, M. (2005). Contract theory. MIT press.
Brest, P. (n.d.). Investing for impact with Program-Related Investments (SSIR). Retrieved April 05, 2021, from https://ssir.org/articles/entry/investing_for_impact_with_program_related_investments (accessed on 25 May 2021)
Bugg-Levine, A., & Emerson, J. (2011). Impact investing: Transforming how we make money while making a difference. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 6(3), 9-18.
Clarkin, J. E., & Cangioni, C. L. (2016). Impact investing: A primer and review of the literature. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 6(2), 135-173.
Combs, K. (2014). More than just a trend: The importance of impact investing. Corporate Finance Review, 18(6), 12.
Cooksy, L. J., Gill, P., & Kelly, P. A. (2001). The program logic model as an integrative framework for a multimethod evaluation. Evaluation and program planning, 24(2), 119-128.
Cui, Z. (2017). Discussion on Government Incentive to Investors in PPP Based on Principal Agent Model. Management & Engineering, (29), 63-70.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications.
Delreux, T., & Adriaensen, J. (2017). Introduction. Use and limitations of the principal–agent model in studying the European Union. In The principal agent model and the European Union (pp. 1-34). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Eisenberg, P. (1997). A crisis in the nonprofit sector. National Civic Review, 86(4), 331-341.
Geczy, C., Jeffers, J., Musto, D. K., & Tucker, A. M. (2018). Contracts with benefits: The implementation of impact investing. University of Pennsylvania, University of Chicago, and Georgia State University.
Grant, P. (2012). The Business of Giving: The Theory and Practice of Philanthropy, Grantmaking and Social Investment (Cass Business Press). Palgrave Macmillan.
Hart, O. (1995). Firms, contracts, and financial structure. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Heathcote, C. Forecasting Infrastructure Investment Needs for 50 Countries, 7 Sectors through 2040. Global Infrastructure Outlook and Oxford Economics. 2017. Available online: https://blogs.worldbank.org/ppps/forecasting-infrastructure-investment-needs-50-countries-7-sectors-through-2040 (accessed on 25 March 2021).
Hehenberger, L., Mair, J., & Metz, A. (2019). The Assembly of a Field Ideology: An Idea-Centric Perspective on Systemic Power in Impact Investing. Academy of Management Journal,62(6), 1672–1704.
Höchstädter, A.K., Scheck, B. (2015). What’s in a Name: An Analysis of Impact Investing Understandings by Academics and Practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics 132, 449–475.
Hill, T. (2017). Operations strategy: design, implementation, and delivery. Macmillan International Higher Education. London: Palgrave.
Social Impact Investment Taskforce. (2014). Impact investment: The invisible heart of markets. Retrieved from http://www.weforum.org/pdf/schwabfound/SocialInvestmentManual2011.pdf
(Accessed on 25 May 2021).
Kettner, P. M., Moroney, R. M., & Martin, L. L. (2015). Designing and managing programs: An effectiveness-based approach. Sage Publications.
Kimmerle, H. P. (2019). The principal-agent problem within Sustainable Investing. Scientific Programme Committee, 400.
Lee, M., Adbi, A., & Singh, J. (2020). Categorical cognition and outcome efficiency in impact investing decisions. Strategic Management Journal, 41(1), 86-107.
Levitt, D. A. (2011). Investing in the future: Mission-related and program-related investments for private foundations. The Practical Tax Lawyer, 33-43.
Olsen, S., & Tasch, W. (2004). Mission-related investing. Investors’ Circle. Retrieved from https://community-wealth.org/sites/clone.community-wealth.org/files/downloads/report-olsen-tasch.pdf (Accessed on 20 May 2021).
Osei-Kyei, R., & Chan, A. P. (2015). Review of studies on the Critical Success Factors for Public–Private Partnership (PPP) projects from 1990 to 2013. International journal of project management, 33(6), 1335-1346.
Paul Brest & Kelly Born(2013), Unpacking the Impact in Impact Investing, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 11, 22-27.
Porter, A. (2009). Operations management. Bookboon.
Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute.
Reeves, E., & Palcic, D. (2017). Getting back on track: the expanded use of PPPs in Ireland since the global financial crisis. Policy Studies, 38(4), 339-355.
Shrestha, A., Tamošaitienė, J., Martek, I., Hosseini, M. R., & Edwards, D. J. (2019). A principal-agent theory perspective on PPP risk allocation. Sustainability, 11(22), 6455.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.
Trelstad, B. (2016). Impact Investing: A brief history. Capitalism & Society, 11(2).