本研究旨在探討電腦模擬軟體輔助技術教學之學習成效及其保留度情形，選擇使用宣稱具有技術教學功能的「TINA Pro」與「數位麵包板」的電腦模擬軟體作為數位電路技術「電子電路實習」課程中「數位邏輯」單元的實驗教學，研究樣本以台北市立內湖高級工業職業學校控制科全體二年級學生(共一百零四人)為受試對象進行實驗。本實驗共分成三組(傳統組、TINA組及DB組)，傳統組採用「傳統教學」方式進行技術教學；TINA組採用「TINA Pro」輔助技術教學；DB組組採用「數位麵包板」輔助技術教學，不同組別教學單元內容均相同，且要求學生實際在麵包板上練習電路設計、操作及提供線上輔助教材。學完各個教學單元後即實施成就測驗，並於其後三次(每次間隔14日)作認知與技能的學後保留測驗，藉以分析學生學習之成效與各項差異情形。
經過約四個月的教學實驗後，本研究獲致以下結論：
一、在三組不同組別中，使用TINA Pro電腦模擬軟體輔助技術學習的學生，在四次不同時間評量其認知學習成效全部顯著高於使用傳統學習的學生；同時在四次不同時間評量其技能學習成效有二次顯著高於使用傳統學習的學生，因而可以確認使用TINA Pro電腦模擬軟體輔助技術教學有助於學生技術學習之學習成效，尤其表現在認知學習部分。
二、在十一個向度的學習滿意度問卷調查結果顯示：使用TINA Pro輔助技術教學的學生，在教材的設計方面滿意度顯著高於使用傳統學習的學生；以及使用TINA Pro輔助技術學習的學生，在教材的難易度方面滿意度顯著高於使用傳統學習的學生和使用數位麵包板輔助技術學習的學生，其他九個向度使用電腦模擬軟體(包括TINA Pro或數位麵包板)輔助技術學習的學生與使用傳統學習的學生均無顯著差異。
三、三次不同時間無預警方式評量所得之學後保留度，在使用電腦模擬軟體(包括TINA Pro或數位麵包板)輔助技術學習學生之學後認知保留度與使用傳統學習的學生皆無顯著差異，且三次不同的學後認知保留度皆小於1，符合遺忘的特性。在學後技能保留度部份，在實驗課程結束後十四日及四十二日使用傳統學習的學生及使用數位麵包板輔助技術學習的學生，均顯著高於使用TINA Pro輔助技術學習的學生，其他不同時間所測得之技能學習成效保留度無顯著差異之情形。

The purpose of this study was to investigate the learning and retention effect of computer simulation software assisted technical instruction. Two softwares, the Toolkit for Interactive Network Analysis Professional Edition (TINA Pro) and the Digital Breadboard, both of which are believed to be effective skill instruction assists, were selected and applied to students’ study of digital logic circuit in the course of Practice of Electronic Circuit as experimental teaching. The subjects of the experimental teaching were all of the 2nd grade students in the Department of Control Engineering, Taipei Municipal Nei-Hu Vocational Industrial School, totaling 104 students. They were divided into three groups. The Traditional group (TRA group) received “traditional instruction,” the TINA group received the TINA Pro assisted technical instruction, and the DB group received the Digital Breadboard assisted technical instruction in their study of digital electronic technique. The teaching units in the course contents were the same for all the three groups, and all the students were required to practice circuit design and operation on the breadboard. After each teaching unit was done, a performance test was given to all the students, and after that three further tests were given to all the students with an interval of 14 days between tests for the purpose of testing students’ cognition and skill retention after learning. The results of the tests were then used to analyze differences of learning effect and feedbacks as seen existing among the groups after receiving different learning methods.
The following conclusion was drawn following the four-month experimental teaching period.
1. Among the three different groups, the group using the TINA Pro assisted technical instruction achieved significantly higher cognition learning results than the group using “traditional teaching material” in all tests out of the four administered in different times; however, out of the four tests, the group using the TINA Pro assisted technical instruction achieved significantly higher skill learning results in 1st. test and 4th. test , thus confirming that the TINA Pro assisted instruction is helpful to students’ skill learning, especially in the area of cognition learning.
2. In a 11-facet learning satisfaction questionnaire survey, the students receiving TINA Pro assisted technical instruction expressed significantly higher satisfaction in teaching material design than did the students receiving “traditional instruction,” while the students receiving TINA Pro assisted technical instruction expressed significantly higher satisfaction in the difficulty/ease level of the teaching material than did the students either receiving the “traditional instruction” or the Digital Breadboard software assisted technical instruction. No significant differences were found in the other nine facets of the same satisfaction questionnaire survey between students receiving computer simulation software assisted technical instruction, including the TINA Pro and the Digital Breadboard, and students receiving “traditional instruction.”
3. In three learning retention pop quizzes administered in three different times, no significant differences in cognition retention were found between the students receiving computer simulation software assisted instruction, including the TINA Pro and the Digital Breadboard, and the students receiving “traditional teaching.” The cognition retention rate of each group in each of the three tests was smaller than 1, which corresponded to the characteristic of forgetfulness. In skill retention, the significant differences were found in the test administered 14 days and 42 days after the experimental course was over, in which the students receiving “traditional instruction” and the students receiving the Digital Breadboard assisted technical instruction achieved significant better scores than did the students receiving the TINA Pro assisted technical instruction. In the other test, no significant difference in skill retention was found among the groups.

中文部份
王文科(2007)。教育研究法(十一版)。台北：五南圖書公司。
王克先(1996)。學習心理學。台北：桂冠圖書公司。
王保進(2006)。視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究(三版)。台北：心理出版社。
江文雄(2000)。職業類科教材教法。台北：師大書苑。
朱延平(1997)。CAI的發展趨勢。CAI課程軟體編製技術參考手冊。台北：教育部電子計算機中心。
朱則剛（1994）。建構主義知識論與情境認知的迷思－兼論其對認知心理學的意義。教學科技與媒體，13，3-14。
何榮桂(1997)。電腦輔助教學緒論。CAI課程軟體編製技術參考手冊。台北：教育部電子計算機中心。
余民寧(2001)。教育測驗與評量–成就測驗與教學評量(二版)。台北：心理出版社。
李世忠(1992)。從電腦教學到超(串連)媒體。教育資料集刊，17，303-325。
李炎福(2005)。臺北市教育局93-95年度網路線上學習計劃內湖高工線上教材製作成果。http://media.nihs.tp.edu.tw/online_media/digital_material.htm#數位邏輯。
李忠勇 (2001)。多媒體電腦輔助教學策略對高職資訊科學生「基礎電子實習」學習成效之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
李美誼(2005)。多媒體英語歌曲教學對提昇國小學童學習動機與學習成效之研究。國立屏東師範學院教育科技研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
李美瑜（1993）。情境學習環境與非情境學習環境對物理概念學習成效影響之研究。ICCE 1993國際電腦輔助教學學生學術研討會論文集。國科會科教處、教育部電子計算機中心。
李咏吟(1998)。認知教學：理論與策略。台北：心理出版社。
李珀(2008)。學習理論。97/05/29取自於URL：http://www. fhjh.tp.edu.tw/mid00/
workpieces00803.htm
李素卿譯(Good, T.L.& Brophy J.) (2003)。當代教育心理學。台北：五南圖書公司。
李堅萍(2000)。Simpson，Harrow與Goldberger心理動作領域教育目標分類之比較研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文(未出版)。
李進寶(1983a)。電腦輔助教學的現況與展望(上)。資訊與電腦，6，62-65。
李進寶(1983b)。電腦輔助教學的現況與展望(下)。資訊與電腦，6，52-56。
李雅慈 (2003)。關聯數位教材對不同性別與記憶類型的國小學童數學學習成就與學後保留之影響。國立臺中師範學院數學教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
李榮乾譯(McCalla,T.R.)(1995)。數位邏輯與計算機設計。台北：東華書局。
李賢輝 (2008)。認知心理與圖像設計。多媒體與網頁。視覺素養學習網。97/05/26取自於URL：http://vr.theatre.ntu.edu.tw/fineart/chap16/chap16-03.htm
杜建勳 (2007)。資訊融入教學和電腦輔助概念構圖在社會領域學習之研究。靜宜大學資訊管理學系研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
佚名 (2008)。認知科學。維基百科。97/05/29取自於URL：http://zh.wikipedia.org/
wiki/%E8%AE%A4%E7%9F%A5%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6──維琪百科。
吳明清(2007)。教育研究–基本觀念與方法之分析。台北：五南圖書。
吳幸宜譯(Margaret E. Gredler) (1994)。學習理論與教學應用。心理出版社。
吳權威、王溢緒(2000)。多媒體製作訓練教材–影像，影音處理與光碟燒錄。台北：松崗圖書。
林炎旦(2000)。職業類科教學方法。載於江文雄主編：職業類科教材教法。 台北：師大書苑，223-303。
林清山譯(Mayer, R.E.) (1997)。教育理學(三版)。台北：遠流出版事業公司。
林清山(2003)。心理與教育統計學。台北：東華書局。
林進材(2006)。教學理論與方法(二版)。台北：五南圖書。
林智煌(2005)。傳統加媒體教學對國小不同年級學童踢毽學習成就之研究。國立臺灣師範大學體育學系在職進修碩士班論文(未出版)。
邱群超 (2001)。應用多媒體發展高職數位電路技能CAI軟體之研究。國立台北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
邱貴發（1996）。情境學習理念與電腦輔助學習－學習社群理念探討。台北市：師大書苑。
邱惠芬 (2003)。多媒體介面對國小學童學習動機、學習成就及學習保留的影響。國立屏東師範學院教育科技研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
邱俊宏(2004)。多媒體電腦輔助教學對國小學童學習線對稱圖形成效之研究。國立屏東師範學院數理教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
周清壹(2004)。資訊融入自然生活科領域教學對國小學生學習動機與學習成就的影響。國立台南大學自然科學教育學系教學碩士論文(未出版)。
岳修平譯(Gagné, E.D.& Yekovich, C.W.& Yekovich, F.R.) (1998)。教學心理學。台北：遠流出版事業公司。
洪榮昭、劉明洲(1999)。電腦輔助教學之設計原理與應用(增訂一版)。台北：師大書苑。
計惠卿(1997)。漫談多媒體與超媒體CAI。CAI課程軟體編製技術參考手冊。台北：教育部電子計算機中心。
孫士雄 (2001)。多媒體電腦輔助教學對問題解決能力、機械製圖學習成效與學後保留之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
孫碧霞(2004)。多媒體電腦輔助教學對國小學習障礙學生分數概念學習成效之研究。國立臺東大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
徐照麗(2003)。教學媒體–系統化設計，製作與應用(二版)。台北：五南圖書公司。
翁上錦(1996)。職業教育與訓練能力本位教材發展之研究–以工業電子為例。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文(未出版)。
許繼德(2001)。網路輔助教學對不同認知風格的國小學童在英語學習動機與成就之影響。國立屏東師範學院教育科技研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
許書務(1985)。電腦輔助教學與傳統式教學其學後保留之比較：以6502微處理機課程為例。國立臺灣師大工業教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
郭生玉(1998)。心理與教育研究法(十五版)。台北：精華書局。
郭生玉(1999)。心理與教育測驗(十三版)。台北：精華書局。
黃天中、洪英正(1993)。心理學。臺北：桂冠。
陳永春 (2003)。概念構圖教學策略與不同性別對國小五年級學童在社會科學習成就與學後保留之探究。國立屏東師範學院教育科技研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
陳李綢、郭妙雪(1998）。教育心理學。台北：五南圖書公司。
陳明琪(2003)。多媒體網路教學與傳統教學對學習效果之比較-以商業類科為例。教學科技與媒體，63，49-64。
陳俊勝(2005)。數位設計原理與應用。台北：儒林圖書公司。
陳景堂(2006)。統計分析SPSS for Windows 入門與應用(六版)。台北：儒林圖書公司。
莊崇成(2000)。TINA與EWB在數位電路技術教學的實驗研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
莊謙本(1995)。電子電路電腦輔助教學評量模式探討。教學科技與媒體， 22，3-9。
莊謙本(1996)。智慧型電腦輔助教學在數位通訊技術教學之實驗研究(國科會計畫編號NSC 85-2511-S-003-047)。
莊謙本(1997a)。發展一個電子電路電腦輔助教學技能評量工具之研究(國科會計畫編號NSC 86-2516-S-003-004)。
莊謙本(1997b)。數位電路技術電腦化適性測驗之研究。台北：師大書苑。
莊謙本(1998a)。電腦化適性測驗在電子電路模擬教學的成效分析研究(國科會計畫編號NSC 87-2516-S-003-004)。
莊謙本(1998b)。技能評量的內在與外在因素。教學科技與媒體，42，38-42。
莊謙本(1998c)。電腦化技術教學。台北：教育部顧問室。
莊謙本(2003)。電子科技問題式學習系統之發展與教學成效分析。(國科會計畫編號NSC91-2520-S-003-012)。
張文菁(2007)。TMCAI結合動機策略對國小社會學習動機、成就與保留之影響。慈濟大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
張文葉(2004)。傳統教學與媒體教學對學生學習成效影響之研究。大葉大學資訊管理學系碩士論文(未出版)。
張祖忻(2006)。教學設計–基本原理與方法。台北：五南圖書公司。
張春興，郭生玉(1973)。兒童語文習慣之複雜度與其聯對學習及學後保留關係之實驗研究。教育心理學報，6，1-13。
張春興(2000)。現代心理學。台北：東華書局。
張春興(2004)。心理學概要(重修版)。台北：東華書局。
張春興(2006)。張氏心理學辭典(重訂版)。台北：東華書局。
張春興，林清山(1998)。教育心理學(十二版)。台北：東華書局。
張霄亭(1996)。華語清境式多媒體教學課程研究與發展(I)(國科會計畫編號 NSC 85-2413-H-003-014)。
張霄亭、朱則剛(2008)。教學媒體。台北：五南圖書公司。
湯清二(1998)、電腦多媒體學習系統。載於王千倖等著：電腦與教學。台北：正中書局，161-222。
國立教育資料館(2008)。視聽教育。97/05/29 取自於URL:http://3d.nioerar.edu.tw/
2d/av/lesson/lesson_0201.asp
曾尹姿(2005)。電腦媒體運用於國中幾何學習成效之研究-以三角形基本性質為例。慈濟大學教育研究所教學碩士論文(未出版)。
曾文章(2005)。媒體介入對國中游泳教學認知與技能表現之研究。國立臺灣師範大學體育學系在職進修碩士班論文(未出版)。
詹高樹(2008)。TINA PRO 電路設計及模擬講義。台北：台科大圖書公司。
葉明恭(1996)。電腦輔助教學系統在數位調變與解調變技術教學成效及學後保留之實驗研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
葉重新(2005)。心理學(三版)。台北：心理出版社。
楊順南(1996)。憂鬱理論的整合研究──認知取向。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
鄭明韋(1999)。國立空中大學嘉義地區學生學習方式、學習參與程度與學習成效之研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
鄭茂堅 (2005)。電腦輔助教學對特教高職部學生學習成效研究（金錢與消費為例）。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
鄭晉昌(1993）。自「情境學習」的認知觀點探討電腦輔助中教材內容的設計－從幾個教學系統談起。教學科技與媒體雙月刊，12，3-14。
潘仁傑(1995)。三體互動式電腦輔助教學系統在類比通訊技術教學成效之實驗研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
蔡文亮(2007)。數位邏輯實習。台北：知行文化事業股份有限公司。
蔡錫濤(1995)。技能學習導向的電腦多媒體系統設計初探。教學科技與媒體，22，10-15。
鍾邦友（1994）。情境式電腦輔助數學學習軟體製作研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
鐘建坪(2005)。資訊科技融入自然科的教學。師友月刊。451，28-29。
劉明舜(2008)。數位邏輯電路(二版)。台北：旗立資訊股份有限公司。
劉冠佑(1996)。電腦輔助電路設計與數位電路實習(下)。台北：全華科技圖書公司。
盧正川、張益順(2007)。數位邏輯電路實習。台北：旗立資訊股份有限公司。
藍皓華(2004）。成人在網路學習中學習互動、合作學習風格、與後設認知對於網路學習滿意度關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
顏欣加(2001)。傳統教學與媒體教學對龍舟知識及動作技能學習成就之影響。國立臺灣師範大學體育學系在職進修碩士班論文(未出版)。
顏晴榮(1997)。電腦輔助教學在工科技術實習應用之探討。技職雙月刊，39，55-60。
蕭柱惠(2008)。數位邏輯實習(三版)。台北：台科大圖書股份有限公司。

外文部份
Aiken, L.R.(1997). Psychological testing and assessment.(9th ed.) Bobston : Allyn and Bacon.
Alessi, S.M. & Trollip, S.R.(1991). Computer-based instruction：methods and development(2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice-Hall.
Aufshnaiter, S. V., & Welzel, M. (1997). Learning processes in the field of electricity: Results of a cross age study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 407226).
Ausbel, D.P＆Novak,J.D.（1978）.Educational psychology：A cognitive view（2nd ed.）.New York：Holt,Rinehart,and Winston.
Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of Behavior Modification. New York : Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Bekerman, Zvi, Ed.; Burbules, Nicholas C., Ed.; Silberman-Keller, Diana, Ed.(2006). Learning in Places: The Informal Education Reader. Counterpoints, Studies in the Postmodern Theory of Education Volume 249. New York :Peter Lang.
Berends, Inez E.; Van Lieshout, Ernest C. D. M.(2009). The Effect of Illustrations in Arithmetic Problem-Solving: Effects of Increased Cognitive Load (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ833380). Learning and Instruction, 19 (4), 345-353 Aug 2009. Retrived from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/ April. 21, 2009.
Bloom,B.S., Engelhart,M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill,W.H., & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives-the classification of educational goals, handbook 1：cognitive domain. New York: David Mckay.
Bodrova. E. & Leong, D.J.（1996）.Tools of the mind. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-41.
Brown, Judith O.(2009). Experiential Learning E-Portfolios: Promoting Connections between Academic and Workplace Learning Utilizing Information and Communication Technologies. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Meeting (Annual, San Diego, CA, Apr 13-17, 2009).
Bruner, J.S.(1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: BelknapPress.
Cavanagh, Sean (2009). "Depth" Matters in High School Science Studies. Education Week, 28(24),1, 16-17. Mar 2009.
Chang, C.Y.(2002). The Impact of Different Forms of Multimedia CAI on Students' Science Achievement. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 39(4), 280-288.
Chuang,C.P. & Pan J.C.(1995). The effectiveness of microcomputer assistedelectronic laboratory instruction. The international conference on skill formation,ICSF.
Chuang,C.P., Pan,J.C. & Yei,M.K.(1996). The experiment of microcomputerassisted instruction for electronic circuit laboratory training. The fifth international conference on computer assisted instruction, ICCAI.
Chuang, C.P., Hsu, S.W., Yo C.S. (2005) Implementing PBL in Computer Troubleshooting Instruction, PBL in Context-Bridging Work and Education, Lahti, Finland. June 12-15, 2005.
Christensen L.B. & Crawford,H.J.(1985). Developing research skill：A laboratory manual. Bonston:Allyn and Bacon.
Coleman-Martin, M.B., Heller, K.W., Cihak, D.F., & Irvine, K.L.( 2005). Using computerassisted instruction and the Nonverbal Reading Approach to teach word identification, June, 80-90.
Dale, E.(1946). Audio-visual method in teaching(3rd ed). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Dally, W.J. & Poultion,J .W.(1998). Digital system engineering. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Debevec, K., Shih, M., & Kashyap, V.(2006). Learning strategies and performance in a technology integrated classroom. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 293-307.
Desrochers, D.J.(1994). Heathkit educational systems. Benton Harbor.
Ebbinghaus, H. (1985). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Dover Publications.
Electronics Workbench Software engineers(1996). Electronics Workbench user’s manual. Canada: Interactive Image Technologies Ltd..
Elliot, E. S., & Deweck, C. S. (1988).Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement .Journal of Personal-ity and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5-12.
Ertl, Mark A.(2007). The Effects of Initial Touch Keyboarding Speed Achievement of Fifth Graders and Touch Keyboarding Skill Retention in Seventh Grade. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED499927). Retrived from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/Home.portal. Apr. 10, 2009.
Fairbrother, Jeffrey T.; Shea, John B (2005). The Effects of a Single Reminder Trial on Retention of a Motor Skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76(1), 49-59. Mar 2005.
Fitzpatrick, Tess; Al-Qarni, Ibrahim; Meara, Paul (2008). Intensive Vocabulary Learning: A Case Study. Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 239-248. Dec 2008.
Fletcher, S.(1991). Designing competence-based training. London:Kogan Page Limited.
Franz, V. H.; Scharnowski, F.; Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2005). Illusion Effects on Grasping Are Temporally Constant Not Dynamic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1359-1378.
Gagné, R.M., Wager, W. & Rojas, A.(1981). Planning and authoring computer assisted instruction lessions. Education Technology, 21, 7-26.
Gagné, R.M.(1985). The conductions of learning and theory of Instruction (4th ed). New York: Holt,Rinehart & Winston.
Griffin, M. M., & Griffin, B. W. (1996). Situated cognition and cognitive style: Effects on students' learning as measured by conventional tests and performance assessments. Journal of Experimental Education. 64(4), 293-308.
Guthrie, J. W.（1982）. Encyclopedia of education researched by Harold E.Mitezel. NY: Free Press.
Harrow, A.J.(1972). A taxonomy of the psychomotor and the classification of educational objectives in the psychomotor domain. New York : David Mckay.
Hilte, Maartje; Reitsma, Pieter (2008). What Type of Computer-Assisted Exercise Supports Young Less Skilled Spellers in Resolving Problems in Open and Closed Syllable Words? Annals of Dyslexia, 58 (2), 97-114. Dec 2008.
Hiltz, S.R.(1980). The virtual classroom: learning without limits via computer network. New Jersey : Ablex publishing Co.
Hollan, J.D., Hutchins, E.L. ＆ Weitzman, L.M.(1989). STEAMER: Aninteractive, inspectable, simulation-based training system., edited by Greg Kearsley, MA : Addision-Wesley, 112-134.
Howard Gardner. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York：Basic Books.
Karon, L. (1975). An experimental study comparing computer-assisted instruction with the traditional lecture method in an introductory learning disabilities course give to medical student. Dissertation Abstracts International,36,4226-A.
Kerr, S., & Jermier, J. M.(1978). Subordinates for leadership: their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 375-403.
Kock, Ned; Aiken, Robert; Sandas, Cheryl. (2006). Isolated Versus Integrated Case Studies: A Comparison in the Context of Teaching Complex and Domain-Specific IT Applications. Computers and Education, 46(4), 446-457.
Lab-Volt Software Engineers(1992). The F.A.C.E.T. Authoring System User’s Manual. L.A. : Buck Engineering Inc.
Lave, J & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation., Cambridge NJ: Cambridge University Press.
Liao, Yuen-kuang Cliff, Chang, Huei-wen & Chen, Yu-wen (2008). Effects of Computer Applications on Elementary School Students' Achievement: A Meta-Analysis of Students in Taiwan. Computers in the Schools, 24(3-4), 43-64.
Maloney, Edward J. ( 2007). What Web 2.0 Can Teach Us about Learning. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(18), B26. Jan 2007.
McCoog, Ian J.(2008). 21st Century Teaching and Learning (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED502607).
McMillan, J.E.(1992). Educational Research：fundmentals for the consumer. New York : HarperCollins. ,176.
Merrill, M.D., Schneider, E.W. & Fletcher, K.A.(1980). TICCIT. New Jersey : Educational Technology Publications.
Miller, George A. (1994). The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information. Psychological Review, v101 (2), 343-52.
Morgan, Catherine; Richardson, William M. (1972). The Computer as a Classroom Tool. Educational Technology: Teacher and Technology Supplement, 12(10), 71-73.
Nagel, Nancy G.(1996). Learning through real-world problem solving: The power of integrating teaching. Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Corwin Press.
Namwar, Yousef & Rastgoo, Azam (2008). Weblog as a Learning Tool in Higher Education. Journal of Distance Education--TOJDE , 9(3), 176-185.
Newell, A. & Simon, H. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Novak, J.D., ＆ Gowin, D.B.(1984). Learning how to learn. New York： Cambridge University Press.
Palincsar, A., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.
Papert, S.(1980). Mindstorms:Children,computer and power ideas. NJ : Basic Book.
Pavlov, I. P. (1927) . Conditioned reflexes. London: Oxford University Press.
Piaget, Jean (1965). The Child's Conception of Number.
Popham, W.J.(1993). Educational research. MA : Allyn and Bacon. ,229.
Prentice, Mary (2009). Service-Learning's Impact on Developmental Reading/Writing and Student Life Skills Courses. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 33(3-4), 270-282. Mar 2009.
Pyle, Ransford C.; Dziuban, Charles D. (2001). Technology: Servant or Master of the Online Teacher? Library Trends, 50(1) , 130-44.
Rahmlow, H.F., Fratini, R.C. & Ghesquire, J.R. (1980). PLATO. NJ : Educational Technology Publications.
Randall O'Reilly and Yuko Munakata (2000). Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience Understanding the Mind by Simulating the Brain.
Randy, L.B.(1988). A comparison of gain scores and retention rates of four selected learning strateges. (Doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah).
Resnick, L. (1988). Learning in school and out. Educational Research, 16(9), 13-20.
Rubenstein, Rheta N., Ed.(2004). Perspectives on the Teaching of Mathematics. Sixty-Sixth Yearbook [with Companion Guidebook]. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Ruscio, John (2008). A Probability-Based Measure of Effect Size: Robustness to Base Rates and Other Factors. Psychological Methods, 13(1), 19-30.
Schwarz, Christina V.; Gunckel, Kristin L.; Smith, Ed L.; Covitt, Beth A.; Bae, Minjung; Enfield, Mark; Tsurusaki, Blakely K.(2008). Helping Elementary Preservice Teachers Learn to Use Curriculum Materials for Effective Science Teaching. Science Education, 92(2), 345-377.
Sipple, C.J. ＆ Sipple, R.J.(1980). Computer dictionary. (3rd ed.) Howard W.Sams Co.
Skinner, B.F.(1968). The technology of teaching. New York : Appleton Century Crofts.
Slivan, E. (1986). Motivation in social constuctivist theory. Educational Psychologist. 21(3), 209-233.
Stice, J.E.(1987a). Using Kolb's learning cycle to improve student learning. Engineering education, 77(5), 291-296.
Stice, J.E.(1987b). Further Reflections:Useful Resources. New directions for teaching and learning, 30, 101-109.
Stillings, N. A., Weisler, S. E., Chase, C. H., Feinstein, M. H., Garfield, J. L., & Rissland, E. L. (1995). Cognitive science: An introduction. London, England: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Stokes, Patricia D.; Lai, Betty; Holtz, Danielle; Rigsbee, Elizabeth; Cherrick, Danielle (2008). Effects of Practice on Variability, Effects of Variability on Transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34 (3), 640-659. Jun 2008.
Sturgeon, C. Michael; Walker, Christin (2009). Faculty on Facebook: Confirm or Deny? Paper presented at the Annual Instructional Technology Conference (14th, Murfreesboro, TN, Mar 29-31, 2009).
Suchman (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tabbers, H. K.; Martens, R. L.; van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (2004). Multimedia Instructions and Cognitive Load Theory: Effects of Modality and Cueing. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74( 1), 71-81.
Thorndike, E. L. & Woodworth R. S.(1901). The influence of im-provement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. Psychological Review, 8, 247-261.
TINA (2009). TINA V8. Retrived from http://www.tina.com/English/tina/start.php. Feb. 10, 2009.
TINA Software engineers(1994). Toolkit for interactive network analysis user’s manual. USA : Designsoft Inc.
Tsai, S.Y.W., & Pohl, N.F.(1980). Computer-assisted instruction angemented with planned teacher/student contacts. Journal of Experimental Education, 49(2), 120-126.
Ulric, N. R. (1967). Cognition and reality-principles and implications of cognitive psychology. New York: W. H. Freeman & Company Press.
Underwood, B.J.(1957). Psychological Research. New York Appletion-Century-Grofts.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Watson, J. B., (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychology Review, 20, 158-177.
Weiner, B. (1982). The Emotional Consequences of Aausal Ascriptions. In M.S. Fiske (Eds.), Affect and Congnition. Hillsidale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). A social cultural approach to socially shared cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition .85-100.Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Wittrock, M. C. (1978). The cognitive movement in instruction. Educational Psychology, 13, 15-29.
Young, M. F. (1993). Instruction design for learning. Educational Technology research and Development, 41(1), 43-58.