研究生: |
賴敏慧 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
國中童軍利社會行為之研究 |
指導教授: | 沈六 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
公民教育與活動領導學系 Department of Civic Education and Leadership |
論文出版年: | 2003 |
畢業學年度: | 91 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 258 |
中文關鍵詞: | 童軍 、利社會行為 、合群 、關懷 、幫助 |
英文關鍵詞: | Scout, Prosocial behavior, Sociable, Concern, Helpness |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:241 下載:35 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探究國中童軍利社會行為表現,並分析國中童軍與非童軍利社會行為表現之差異,且探討不同人口變項、家庭因素、個人因素之國中童軍利社會行為表現之差異,尚瞭解人口變項、家庭、個人等因素對利社會行為表現的聯合預測力,又探討童軍活動對國中童軍利社會行為的影響因素,最後調查分析國中童軍對童軍活動的意見及看法。
本研究採行問卷調查法,首先透過文獻探討以了解利社會行為的涵義、理論基礎及相關研究。其次編製「國中學生利社會行為問卷」及「國中童軍利社會行為意見調查問卷」,並抽樣調查台灣22個縣市140所國中3937名學生,其中童軍1822名,非童軍2055名。
隨之,將調查所得資料,依照研究設計進行資料處理,逐一分析與討論結果,用以驗證研究假設。茲將本研究結果綜合歸納提出如下結論:
壹、國中童軍與非童軍利社會行為表現屬中上程度且二者有差異存在
一、國中童軍的利社會行為表現屬於中上程度。
二、國中非童軍的利社會行為表現屬於中上程度。
三、國中童軍利社會行為表現優於非童軍。
貳、國中童軍利社會行為表現因人口變項不同而有差異
一、國中女童軍的利社會行為表現比男童軍佳。
二、北區之國中童軍的幫助行為表現比中區童軍佳。
參、國中童軍利社會行為表現因其家庭因素之不同而有差異
一、不同出生序的國中童軍之利社會行為表現無顯著差異。
二、不同家庭信仰的國中童軍之利社會行為表現無顯著差異。
三、中上及中等家庭社經地位的國中童軍之利社會行為表現比中下家庭社經地位童軍佳。
四、不同家庭類型的國中童軍之利社會行為表現無顯著差異。
肆、國中童軍利社會行為表現因其個人因素之不同而有差異
一、有幼童軍經驗的國中童軍之利社會行為表現比無幼童軍經驗的國中童軍佳。
二、愈積極參與活動的國中童軍之利社會行為表現愈佳。
伍、國中童軍的性別、家庭社經地位、幼童軍經驗、不同參與活動態度對利社會行為有顯著的聯合預測力。
陸、國中童軍利社會行為的影響因素:
一、童軍活動能增進童軍利社會行為表現。
二、諾言、規律和銘言是童軍助人的指標。
三、楷模提供童軍利社會行為的榜樣。
四、超我之「良心」是童軍利社會行為的內在驅力。
五、教材內容及教法可提昇童軍利社會行為表現。
六、童軍活動的情境激發童軍努力向善及利社會行為。
柒、國中童軍對童軍活動表示支持與肯定。
根據研究結論,爰提出本研究之建議如下:
壹、教育行政機構方面
一、對國中童軍利社會行為之培養與促進應更積極與重視。
二、鼓勵各級學校設立童軍團,尤應落實國小幼童軍團的設立,給予經費辦理各項童軍活動並鼓勵參加。
三、訂定全國童軍活動發展政策,縮短區域差距;多舉辦全國性或跨區性之童軍活動,以平衡區域之差異。
四、提高童軍團長及活動人員遴選門檻,遴選童軍團長務必以興趣及服務熱忱為優先考量
貳、國民中學方面
一、鼓勵學生參加童軍團,積極參與童軍活動
二、學校重大慶典及各項活動應多鼓勵童軍團指派童軍協助服務
三、強化童軍團之正常運作,充分尊重肯定團長的專業及努力。
四、禮聘退休童軍團長擔任義工,善用其熱忱、經驗與智慧,建立楷模學習之效果。
五、遴選童軍團長應以性向、人格特質為優先考量
六、學校童軍團應能與社區活動及服務結合,使社區青少年有機會參與有益身心健康之活動。
參、各校童軍團長方面
一、童軍團長應力求熟悉社區環境,結合社區資源,尋找提供童軍發揮服務精神的機會,培養愛社區、愛家鄉和愛國之情操。
二、多舉辦童軍活動,鼓勵童軍參加各項活動,使發展更多利社會行為。
三、團長帶領童軍活動時,能善用童軍教材內容及教法,提供更多元的教學方式,以利於童軍身心健全發展,並培養童軍的責任心,以引導童軍利社會行為的表現。
四、團長應善用小隊長、團員間之楷模學習效果,鼓勵童軍團員能以身作則,互相學習。
五、團長能善於利用活動的情境,在活動中能營造溫暖和諧氣氛,促進團隊合作的風氣。
六、團長在帶團領導與教導方式上,應貫徹性別平等之理念,避免性別差異現象的續存及意識型態的影響。
七、團長帶團時對來自低家庭社經地位之童軍多給予服務機會,加以引導鼓勵利社會行為的表現。
肆、父母家長方面
一、鼓勵孩子參加童軍活動。
二、慷慨支援學校團務或孩子之同學所需配備。
三、積極參與孩子的童軍活動,並可擔任服務員或義工。
The purpose of this study is to investigate the prosocial behavior of Scouts in junior high schools; to analyse the differences of prosocial behavior between the Scouts and non-Scouts; to study variables of population difference, family influences on Scouts, and personal factors affecting the prosocial behavior of Scouts; to understand the joint predictable effect of sex differences, family influences and personal factors on the prosocial behavior of Scouts; to investigate the factors found in scouting activities which influence the prosocial behavior of Scouts; and finally, to analyse the suggestions and perspective of Scouts relating to the scouting activities held in junior high schools.
This study is carried out by means of surveys, but first of all, a review of the literature is presented to understand the meaning of prosocial behavior and its related theories. The surveys consist of two questionnaires: “The Questionnaire of Prosocial Behavior of Junior High School Students” and “The Questionnaire of the Prosocial Behavior of High School Scouts”. Both were given to 1822 Scouts and 2055 non-scouts, all in all, 3937 students, in 140 junior high schools in 22 counties and cities of Taiwan.
After the surveys were completed according to the original study plan, by checking out the study hypotheses one by one, the following results are presented as the conclusions of this study:
1. The prosocial behavior of both high school Scouts and non-Scouts are above average on the measuring scale, with these differences between the groups:
(1) The prosocial behavior of Scouts is above average.
(2) The prosocial behavior of non-Scouts is above average.
(3) The prosocial behavior of Scouts is better than that of non-Scouts.
2. There is a difference between the prosocial behavior variables of population.
(1) The prosocial behavior of girl Scouts is better than that of boy Scouts.
(2) The helping behavior of Scouts in northern Taiwan is better than that of Scouts from the central area of Taiwan.
3. There is a difference in prosocial behavior of Scouts according to the different influencing factors in the family.
(1) There is no significant difference in the prosocial behavior of Scouts considered in the order of birth.
(2) There is no significant difference in the prosocial behavior of Scouts according to the religious belief of their families.
(3) The prosocial behavior of Scouts from families of the middle and higher economic level is better than that of Scouts from families of the lower middle and below economic level.
(4) There is no significant difference in the prosocial behavior of Scouts judged by the size of the family.
4. There is a difference in the prosocial behavior of Scouts according to the influence of their personal factors.
(1) The prosocial behavior of Scouts who have had experiences as junior Scouts is better than that of Scouts who did not have such experience.
(2) Those who more actively participate in scouting activities also show better performance in prosocial behavior.
5. The difference in sex, the family’s economic situation, one’s previous experience in scouting and attitude in joining the Scouts jointly give a significant power of predicting the prosocial behavior of Scouts.
6. The following factors influence the prosocial behavior of the Scouts:
(1) Scouting activities do increase the prosocial behavior of the Scouts.
(2) The promises, disciplines and slogans are paradigms for the helping behavior of the Scouts.
(3) Modeling (of activities) by the Scoutmasters are a good example to the Scouts of prosocial behavior.
(4) The “conscience” of the super ego is the inner motivating drive for the prosocial behavior of the Scouts.
(5) The contents and the methods of instruction can elevate the prosocial behavior of the Scouts.
(6) The atmosphere of the scouting activities may stimulate the prosocial behavior and the good will of the Scouts.
7. The Scouts in junior high school have supported and affirmed the value of scouting activities.
According to the conclusions drawn from this study, I would like to offer my suggestions to the following:
1. To educational policy makers:
(1) Pay more attention to promoting the prosocial behavior of the Scouts.
(2) Encourage the establishing of scouting organizations in all school levels, but especially in the elementary schools, and the giving of the necessary financial assistance.
(3) Make up development policies and accounting activities for the whole country in order to give equal opportunities to various areas.
(4) Set up higher standards for the recruiting of scoutmasters and other personnel as well. An interest in scouting and a willingness to serve should be considered top priorities for recruitment.
2. To school authorities:
(1) Encourage all students to actively participate in scouting activities.
(2) Assign the Scouts to serve on all occasions of school celebrations and activities.
(3) Strengthen the regular operations of the scouting corps and respect the expertise and the endeavors of the scoutmasters.
(4) Make good use of the enthusiasm, experience, wisdom and good modeling of the retired scoutmaster in his volunteer work.
(5) Aptitude and personality should be the top priorities for the recruitment of scoutmasters.
(6) In order to help the youth in the community, the school should seek opportunities to cooperate in community activities.
3. To the Scoutmasters:
(1) Become familiar with the communities in your area, in order to find more resources and opportunities for the service of the school Scouts. In this way, they may get more exercise in their love for their community, their hometown and their country as well.
(2) Hold more activities where the Scouts can exercise their prosocial behavior.
(3) Make good use of available teaching material in the multiple teaching methods for the better development of the Scouts’ healthy mind and sense of responsibility. In this way, you may help to promote the prosocial behavior of the Scouts.
(4) Making good use of modeling among the group leaders and Scouts themselves makes for better learning.
(5) Create a warm and harmonious atmosphere to promote a spirit of cooperation.
(6) Promote the ideal of equity and equality between the sexes in the exercise of their leadership and instructions, so as to avoid sex bias.
(7) Give those Scouts who come from economically disadvantaged families more opportunities to serve in order to promote prosocial behavior.
4. To the parents:
(1) Encourage your children to join scouting activities.
(2) Be generous in helping with the scouting equipment at the school and for individual needy Scouts.
(3) Actively participate in Scouting activities of the children and be volunteers.
一、中文部分
丁祖蔭、強贛生(譯)(民77)。J. L. Freedman, D. O. Sears & J. M. Carlsmith著。社會心理學。台北:五洲。
丁興祥、李美枝、陳皎眉(民78)。社會心理學。台北:空大。
中華民國女童軍總會(民91)。中華民國女童軍服務員手冊。台北:中華民國女童軍總會。
中國童子軍訓練暨進程委員會(民82)。童子軍團長手冊。台北:中國童子軍總會。
木村敦(民89)。對不同關係對象的利他行為與利他動機—台灣與日本之比較。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
王保進(民88)。視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。台北:心理出版社。
王淑俐(民84)。青少年情緒的問題、研究與對策。台北:合記。
王鍾和(民90)。父母應如何因應孩子的自私行為。學生輔導,75,122-125。
王柏壽(民74)。父母與同儕對青少年做決定的影響之比較研究。嘉義師院學報,15,47-144。
朱瑞玲(民81)。中國人的慈善觀念。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,75,105-132。
江芳威(民81)。艾立克遜的人格發展理論。載於郭為藩(主編),現代心理學(頁167-204)。台北:師大書苑。
沈六、鐘南、陳鐵、吳務貞、謝美連、黃玉、林英貴(民78)。台灣省國民中學童軍教育問題研究。台北:國立台灣師範大學公民訓育學系。
沈六(民80)。道德發展與行為之研究。台北:水牛。
沈六(民82a)。群育的科學基礎—利社會行為之發展。訓育研究,32(2),53-63。
沈六(民82b)。人本主義的道德發展論與教育。載於黃昆輝(主編),美育與人生(頁167-202)。台北:三民。
沈六(民83)。精神分析的道德發展論。訓育研究,32(4),1-10。
沈六(民87)。社會學習論道德發展觀與教育。公民訓育學報,7,27-66。
李茂興、余伯泉(譯)(民84)。E. Aronson, T. D. Wilson & R. M. Akert著。社會心理學。台北:楊智。
李美枝(民68)。社會心理學。台北:大洋。
李美枝(民75)。社會心理學。台北:大洋。
李惠加(民86)。青少年發展。台北:心理。
李昌叡(民80)。幼兒分享行為之研究。國立臺灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
李昭玲(民75)。學前兒童利社會行為的觀察研究-一個幼稚園大班的觀察。國立臺灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
李雯智(民85)。國小五年級兒童利社會行為俗民誌研究。國立嘉義師範學院國民教育研究所,未出版,嘉義。
李新民(民85)。國小教師規範權運作對六年級學生班級參與心態之影響。國立台南師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南。
李駱遜(民85)。利社會行為發展及其在幼兒教育上的應用。研習資訊,13(4),41-47。
李駱遜(民89)。四歲幼兒利社會行為之研究:以一個幼稚園小班為例。國教學報,12,307-339。
呂建政(民87)。國民中學童軍教育課程研究。台北:水牛。
汪慧鈺(民89)。從青少年問題談心靈開拓與提升。學生輔導,70,44-51。
林維芬(民80)。年級學習策略對國小兒童利社會行為及利社會道德推理之影響。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
林素卿(民79)。艾齊厄尼「順從理論」及其在國民中小學之適用性。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
林清湫(民86)。性別、年級、道德推理、同理心與國小學童利社會行為關係之研究。國立嘉義師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。
林進財(民81)。傅洛依德精神分析論。載於郭為藩(主編),現代心理學說(頁1-30)。台北:師大書苑。
邱皓政(民89)。量化研究與統計分析。台北:五南。
吳明隆(民89)。SPSS統計應用實務。台北:松崗。
吳進安(民82)。孔子之仁與墨子兼愛比較研究。台北:文史哲出版社。
吳務貞(民74)。現階段童軍教育的真諦。載於中國童子軍教育協會(主編),童軍教育論著選集(頁97-102)。台北:水牛。
吳務貞(民75)。群育原理與實施。台北:文景。
吳惠林(民92)。好一場人性善惡的大檢驗。張老師月刊,306,22-45。
吳瓊洳(民87)。談國中學生的重要他人。學生輔導,59,106-111。
洪堯群(民89)。故事講述與討論對幼兒助人意願與利社會道德推理之影響。國立台灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
時蓉華(民85)。社會心理學。台北:東華書局。
袁之琦、游恒山(民79)。心理學名詞辭典。台北:五南。
馬慶強(民81)。中國人的利他行為發展之理論探討。載於楊國樞、余安邦(主編),中國人的心理與行為—理念及方法篇(頁143-175)。台北:桂冠。
夏渙新(民74)。童子軍訓練即是生活教育的理論根據。載於中國童子軍教育學會(主編),童軍教育論著選集(頁179-182)。台北:水牛。
徐觀餘(民74)。童子軍教育的基本法則。載於中國童子軍教育學會(主編),童軍教育論著選集(頁119-126)。台北:水牛。
莊舜榮(民79)。我國社區童軍運動發展之研究。國立政治大學三民主義研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
莊耀嘉(民71)。人本心理學之父—馬斯洛。台北:允晨。
黃安邦(譯)(民79),D. O. Sears, J. L. Freedman & L. A. Peplau著。社會心理學。台北:五南。
黃光國(民76)。義務性道德與功利性道德:臺灣社會中的道德判斷及其相關變項。載於楊國樞、瞿海源(主編),變遷中的臺灣社會(頁447-472)。臺北:中央研究所民族學研究所。
黃希庭(民87)。人格心理學。台北:東華。
黃鈺婷(民89)。青少年自私行為及其相關背景因素之探討。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
黃堅厚(民75)。落實的道德教育「利己」與「利人」。中華文化復興月刊,19(1),18-24。
黃敦涵(民74)。從哲學觀點體察童子軍教育的實際。載於中國童子軍教育學會(主編),童軍教育論著選集(頁169-178)。台北:水牛。
黃煜文(譯)(民89),R. Culp著。中國童子軍—南京十年童子軍手冊中的公民訓練與社會意識。新史學,11(4),17-63。
陳仲庚、張雨新(民79)。古典精神分析人格理論。人格心理學。台北:五南,6,143-161。
陳若幸(民82)。青少年利社會道德推理之研究。國立臺灣師範大學金民訓育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
陳添丁(民79)。童軍教育與國民教育。台北:水牛。
陳 鐵(民70)。國民中學的童軍訓練。台北:臺灣中華書局。
許錦雲(民81)。談孩子利他精神的培養。社教資料雜誌,168,10-14。
郭丁熒(民77)。教師權力類型、學生參與心態與學生學校適應行為之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
郭光寰(民81)。羅吉斯的人格理論。載於郭為藩(主編),現代心理學說(頁243-254)。台北:師大書苑。
郭佳鈴(民92)。人格教育—把每張自私的面具拿下來。張老師月刊,306,58-61。
郭靜晃(民83)。心理學。台北:楊智。
曾華源、劉曉春(譯)(民89)。R. A. Baron & D. Byrne著。社會心理學。台北:洪葉。
陶 唐(民74)。童子軍教育的價值及其必然之趨勢。載於中國童子軍教育學會(主編),童軍教育論著選集(頁137-150)。台北:水牛,。
張文鑫(譯)(民82)。世界童子軍總部著。童子軍運動的基本原則。台北:中國童子軍月刊社。
張春興(民78)。張氏心理學辭典。台北:東華。
張春興(民80)。現代心理學。台北:東華。
張春興(民83)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。台北:東華。
張春興、黃淑芬(民81)。大學教育環境與青年期自我統合形成關係的初步研究。台灣師範大學教育心理學報,15,31-46。
張新仁(民71)。國中生學習行為、學習方法、學習習慣與學習態度的研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
張滿玲(譯)(民88),S. E. Taylor, L. A. Peplau & D. O. Sears 原著。社會心理學。台北:雙葉。
傅全福(民84)。全國童軍教育活動一年來實施的報告。高市文教,53,38-41。
溫健蠶(民86)。大學生的服務學習及學生發展之研究。國立臺灣師範大學公民訓育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
詹志禹(民75)。年級、性別角色、人情取向與同理心的關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文未出版,台北。
蔣惠珍(民75)。學前兒童友伴關係的相關因素研究。國立臺灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
趙宗慈(民76)。父母紀律方式、利他傾向與兒童利社會行為之研究。私立中國文化大學家政研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
趙居蓮(譯)(民84)。A. L. Weber著。社會心理學。台北:桂冠。
蔡秋桃(民82)。幼稚園兒童分享行為之自然研究。幼兒教育學報,2,187-210。
蔡崇振(民86)。當前國內青少年問題及其因應對策。教師天地,86,70-75。
蔡銘津(民81)。青少年學生利他行為調查之研究。臺灣省教育廳學術論文發表會論文,1377-1388。
劉彥俊(民74)。論童軍教育的源流。載於中國童子軍教育協會(主編),童軍教育論著選集(頁221-238)。台北:水牛。
劉彥俊(民83)。童軍教育。台北:水牛。
劉詠堯(民74)。童子軍教育與人性之發揚。載於中國童子軍教育學會(主編),童軍教育論著選集(頁97-102)。台北:水牛。
蕭忠國(民74)。公民教育的新評價。載於中國童子軍教育學會(主編),童軍教育論著選集(頁61-72)。台北:水牛。
賴保禎(民88)。青少年心理學。台北:空大。
蘇建文(民64)。父母教養方式與少年道德行為。中華心理學刊,17,109-124。
蘇建文、林美珍、程小危、林惠雅、幸曼玲、陳李綢、吳敏而、柯華威、陳淑美(民80)。發展心理學。台北:心理。
蘇雪梨(民68)。兒童分享行為發展之研究。家政教育通訊,7,1-6。
蘇清守(民78)。國中學生的助人行為及其在道德教育上的涵義。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北。
蘇清守(77)。教師對國中智能不足男生助人行為的知覺研究。臺灣師範大學教育心理學報,21,59-76。
蘇清守(79)。國中學生的助人行為及其在道德教育上的涵義。教育心理學報,23,99-118。
蘇清守(81)。楷模示範與助人行為。台灣教育,493,19-23。
羅瑞玉(民82)。青少年的人際道德判斷之分析研究。屏東師範學院學報,6,225-262。
羅瑞玉(民86)。國小學生的利社會行為及其相關因素之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,高雄。
鄭玉卿(民)。馬斯洛的人文心理學。載於郭為藩(主編),現代心理學說(頁219-242)。台北:師大書苑。
二、西文部分
Ackerman, A. M. (1983). Substages of moral judgment and prosocial behavior. (PhD., Lehigh University) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT8405639.
Amato, P. R. (1983). Helping behavior in urban and rural environments: Field studies based on a taxonomic organization of helping episodes. Journal of Child Psychology and psychiatry, 28, 865-879.
Anderson, J. M. (1992). The effects of adult commentary and prosocial film modeling on children’s prosocial behavior (children). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California School Of professional Psychology. San Diego.
Ang, R. P-H. (2000). Characteristics of aggressive children’s friends as predictors of subsequent aggression. (PhD., Texas A&M University) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9980107.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New Jersey : prentice Hall.
Barnett, M., & Thompson, S. (1984). The role of affective perspective taking ability and empathic disposition in child’s Machiavellianism, prosocial behavior, and motive helping. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychology Association (Chicage, IL, May 2-5). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED248049).
Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (1991). Social psychology: Understanding human interaction(6th ed.). Newton, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Barrett, D. E., & Radke-Yarrow, M. (1977). Prosocial behavior, social inferential ability and assertiveness in children. Child Development, 48, 475 -481.
Bar-Tal, D. (1976). Prosocial Behavior : Theory and research. New York: John Wiley.
Bar-Tal, D. (1982). Sequential development of helping behavior: A Cognitive learning approach. Developmental Review, 2, 101-124.
Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., & Leiser, T. (1980). The Development of Altruistic Behavior: Empirical Evirdence. Developmental Psychology, 10,516-524.
Bar-Tal, D., & Raviv, A. (1982). A cognitive-learning model of helping behavior development: possible implications and applications. In Eisenberg, N. (Ed.), The development of prosocial behavior. New York : Academic Press.
Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: toward a social psychological answer. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Batson, C. D., Fultz, J., & Schoenrade, P.A. (1987). Distress and empathy : two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. Journal of Personality, 55, 19-40.
Bearbower, B., Mitchell, R., & Summers, K. S. (2000). Improving Student Interpersonal Skills nad Social Growth in Diverse Learning Communitites through Teamwork. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED443551).
Bellenfant, T. N. (2000). Overt prosocial behaviors in multiage and same- grade elementary physical education classes. (DA., Middle Tennessee State University) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9978694.
Benson, N. C., Hartmann, D. P., & Gelfand, D. M. (1981). Intentions and children’s moral judgments. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston.
Berkowitz, L. (1972). Social norms, feelings, and other factors affecting helping and altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social psychology (Vol.6). New York: Academic press.
Berndt, T. J., & Bulleit, T. N. (1985). Effects of sibling relationships on preschoolers’ behavior at home and at school. Developmental Psychology, 21, 761-767.
Binnings, T. R. (1989). The relationship between age and willingness to helpfrom adolescence into adulthood and a comparison of willingness to help in same age and cross-age exchanges (same-age exchanges). (PhD., Pacific Graduate School of Psychology) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9012763.
Blank, D., Fogarty, B., Wierzba, K., & Yore, N. (2000). Improving social skills through cooperative Learning and other instructional strategies. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 443552)
Blair, K. A. (2000). Emotion regulation and aggression: A function of coping style and emotionality. (PhD., George Mason University) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9962987.
Boz, I. (2000). Factors influencing the retention of adult volunteer leaders in the Louisiana Cooperative Extension Service 4-H Program. (PhD., The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical Col.) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, No.AAT9979249.
Braman, D. S. (1983). The effect of the communication of affect and information by the recipient on prosocial behavior. (PhD., University of Southern California) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.Not available from UMI.
Bryant, B. K., & Crockenberg, S. B. (1980). Correlates and Dimensions of Prosocial Behavior: A study of Female Siblings with Their Mothers. Child Development, 51, 529-544.
Cakebread, C. C. (2000). An analysis of volunteer coaching in youth sports. (EdD., Boston University) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9967145.
Campbell, D. T. (1975). On the conflict between biological and social evolution and moral tradition. American Psychologist, 30, 1103-1126.
Cannella, C. A. (1990). Empathy, affective role taking, and prosocial behavior in conduct disordered and non-conduct disordered boys. (PhD., Hofstra University) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9117268.
Carr, D. A. (2000). The effects of individual differences and situational influences on goal-directed prosocial motivation. (PhD., Seton Hall University, College of Education And Human Services) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9969971.
Catherall, T. S. (1980). Varsity scouting : an evaluation of its potential as an altenative for 14 and 15 year-old boys. (PhD., Brigham Young University) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT8016076.
Cauce, A. M. (1987). School and peer competence in early adolescence. Developmental Psychologist, 23, 287-291.
Cauley, K. L. (1985). Self concept as it influences prosocial behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, (PhD., University of Maryland College Park) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9929930.
Chang, A. P. M. (1995). Affect match and prosocial responses as a function of empathy. (PhD., Simon Fraser University, Canada) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.NN06611.
Chao, T-T. (1995). The effects of Goal-Directed and free play activities on preschool children’s prosocial behavior and styles of play. (PhD., The University of Wisconsin-Madison) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9510288.
Chen, M. C. (1996). Psychosocial correlates of prosocial behavior among college students in Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Loyola College.
Chiappetta, L., Harris, L., Moncada, T., & White, C. (2000). Improving social competencies through cooperative learning, conflict resolution and home/school communication. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 444706)
Clark K. R. (2000). The effects of self-schemas, specific mood states and conscious awareness of mood relief strategies in the negative state relief model. (PhD., Pacific Graduate School of Psychology) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9967080.
Cole, D. A. (1991). Change in self-perceived competence as a function of peer and teacher evaluation. Developmental Psychology, 27, 682-688.
Denham, S. A., & Couchoud, E. A. (1993). Scaffolding young children’s prosocial responsiveness: preschooler’s responses to sadness, anger, and pain. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of Society for Research in Child Development. (60th, New Orleans, LA, March 25-28). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED358933).
Doescher, S. M. (1986). Impact of prosocial classroom and home learning programs on preschool children’s prosocial behavior (cooperating, teacher training, sharing, parent education, helping). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University.
Dolan, V. L. (1983). The relationship of parent discipline and parent empathy to children’s empathy and altruistic behavior. (EdD., The University of Rochester) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO. Not available from UMI.
Dovido, J. F. (1984). Helping behavior and altruism : An empirical and conceptual overview. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 17, 361-427. New York : Academic Press.
Dreman, S. B., & Greenbaum, C. W. (1973). Altruism or reciprocity:Sharing behavior in Israeli Kindergarten children. Child Development, 44, 61-68.
Dunn, J., Deater-Deckard, K., & Pickering, K. (1998). Children’s adjustment and prosocial behaviour in step-, Single-parent, and non-stepfamily settings: findings from a community study. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 39, 8, 1083-1095.
Eagly, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping behavior : A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 283-308.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex difference in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ:Erbaum.
Eberly, M. B. (1995). Adolescent prosocial behavior toward parents: A reflection of closeness in the parent-adolescent relationship? (gender differences, attachment) (PhD., The Ohio State University) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9533964.
Eberly, M. B., & Montemayor, R. (1998). Doing good deeds: An examination of adolescent prosocial behavior in the context of parent-adolescent relationships. Journal of Adolescent Research, 13, 4, 403-432.
Eisenberg, N. (1982). The development of reasoning regarding prosocial behavior. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), The development of prosocial behavior (pp.219-249). New York: Academic Press.
Eisenberg, N. (1986). Altruistic emotion, cognition and behavior. New York: Academic press.
Eisenberg, N. (1992). The caring child. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1991). Prosocial behavior and empathy: a multimethod developmental perspective. In M.S.Clark, (Ed.), Prosocial behavior: Review of personality and social psychology (pp.34-61). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Eisenberg, N., Lennon, R., & Roth, K. (1983). Prosocial development in childhood : A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 19, 846-855.
Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 91-119.
Eisenberg, N., & Mussen, P. H. (1989). The roots of prosocial behavior in children. Cambridge University Press.
Eisenberg-Berg, N. (1979). Relationship of prosocial moral reasoning to altruism. Political liberalism, and intelligence. Developmental psychology, 15, 87-89.
Fabes, R. A., Fultz, J., Eisenberg, N., May-Plumlee, T., & Christopher, F. S. (1989). Effects of Rewards on Children’s Prosocial Motivation: A Socialization Study. Developmental Psychology, 25(4), 509-515.
Fixler, B. (2000). A caring and sharing environment helps teach values in kindergarten students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 445781)
Friedrich, L. K., & Stein, A. H. (1973). Aggressive and prosocial television programs and the natural behavior of preschool children. Monographs of The Society For Research In Child Development, 38, 1-63.
Gelfand, D. M., & Hartmann, D. P. (1982). Response consequence and attributions: two contribution to rposocial behavior. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), The development of prosocial behavior (pp.167-198). New York: Academic Press.
Gelfand, D. M., Hartmann, D. P., Cromer. C. C., Smith, C. L., & page, B. C. (1975). The effects of Instructional prompts and praise on Children’s Donation Rates. Child Development,46, 980-983.
Glascott, K. (1992). Thinking and feeling determinants as predictors of teacher prosocial behavior in the classroom (prosocial behavior). (EdD., Arizona State University) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9237257.
Gonzalez, L. E. (1982). Scouting: An adaptable nonformal education alternative to promote development among chilean youth. (PhD., Harvard University) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT8223250..
Grusec, J. E. (1991). Socializing concern for others in the home. Developmental Psychology, 27, 338-342.
Gussman, B. L. (1993). The impact of empathy training on the aggressive behaviors of seriously emotionally disturbed adolescents. (PhD., California School of Professional Psychology-Losangeles) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9403873.
Guyton, M. J. (1997). Contributors to individual differences in the development of prosocial responsiveness in preschoolers. (PhD., Brandeis University) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9718586.
Hoffman, M. L. (1981). Is altruism part of human nature? Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 40, 121-137.
Hoffman, A. J. (1995). Collaborative learning strategies as effective measures in eliciting prosocial behavior among community college students. (PhD., University of California, Los Angeles) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9523606.
Hoffman, M. L. (1975). Altruistic behavior and the parent-child relationship. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 31, 937-943.
Hoffman, M. L. (1982). Development of prosocial motivation: Empathy and guilt. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), The development of prosocial behavior. New York: Academic Press.
Hoffman, M. L. (1976). Empathy, role taking, guilt, and development of altruistic motives. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory, research and social issues (pp.124-143). New york: Holt.
Honig, A. S., & Wittmer, D. S. (1992). Prosocial development in children: Caring, helping, and cooperating; a bibliographic resource guide. New York: Garland publishing, Inc.
Horsch, P. D. (1999). Promoting prosocial behavior an academic competency: An examination of the Responsive Classroom approach to teaching and learning. (PhD., Loyola University of Chicage) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9930576.
Horton-Parker, R. J. (1998). Teaching children to care: engendering prosocial behavior through humanistic parenting. Journal of Humanistic Education and Development, 37 (2), 66-77.
Horwitz, J. A. (1989). Perspective-taking and prosocial moral reasoning : their relationship to prosocial moral behavior in children. (PsyD., Pace University) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9015213.
Howes, C., Matheson, C. C., & Hamilton, C. E. (1994). Maternal, teacher, and Child care history correlates of children’s relationships with peers. Child Development, 65, 264-273.
Huang, J. C. (1989). A study of prosocial behavior in selected Chinese children’s literature(children’s literature). (PhD., University of Oregon) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9010127.
Iannotti, R. J. (1985). Naturalistic and Structured Assessments of prosocial Behavior in Preschool Children: The Influence of Empathy and perspective Taking. Developmental psychology, 21-1,46-55.
Kahila, S. (1993). The role of teaching method in rposocial learning : developing helping behavior by means of the cooperative teaching method in physical education. (DSPORTSC., Jyvaskylan Yliopisto, Finland) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, No.Not Available from UMI.
Knight, G. P., & Kagan, S. (1977). Development of prosocial and Competitive Behaviors in Anglo-American and Mexican-American Children. Child Development, 48, 1385-1394.
Koenig, A. L. (2000). Moral development: The effects of childhood maltreatment on prosocial behaviors and transgressions. (PhD., The University of Rochester) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9985802.
Krebs, D. L. (1970). Altruism-an examination of the concept and a review of literature. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 258-302.
Krebs, D. (1982). Altruism-A rational approach. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), The development of prosocial behavior. New York: Academic press.
Krevans, J. A. (1992). Parents’ use of inductive discipline: relations with children’s empathic responses and prosocial behavior (parents, children). (PHD., The Ohio State University) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9227311.
Larrieu, J. A. (1983). Perspective-taking, values, assertiveness and children’s prosocial behavior. (PhD., Purdue University) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT8400384.
Levitt, M. J., Weber, R. A., Clark, M. C., & McDonnell, P. (1985). Reciprocity of Exchange in Toddler Sharing Behavior. Developmental Psychology, 21-1, 122-123.
Litvack-Miller, W. (1991). The tsructure and development of dispositional empathy during middle childhood and its relationship to prosocial behavior (empathy). (PhD., University of Calgary, Canada) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AATNN75269.
Lo, G. H-C. (1992). A study of the relationship between prosocial behavior and selected variables in four-and five-year-olds of southern baptist day care centers in tarrant county, texas (four year olds, parental factors). (EdD., Southwestern Baptist theological seminary) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO. AAT9223541.
Ludwig, K. B., & Pittman, J. F. (1999). Adolescent prosocial values and self-efficacy in relation to delinquency, risky sexual behavior, and drug use. Youth & Society, 30 (4), 461-482.
Luo, Q. (2000). Parenting and friend affiliation in adolescent development: A cross-cultural comparison. (PhD., Wayne State University) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9966158.
Ma, H. K., Shek, D. T. L., Cheung, P. C., & Oi, B. L. C. (2000). Parental, Peer, and Teacher Influences on the Social Behavior of Hong Kong Chinese Adolescents. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 161, 1, 65-79.
Markman, L. B. (2002). The impact of school culture on adolescents’ prosocial motivation. (PhD., Fordham University) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT3037223.
Mcinerney, F. R. (1995). Shame and guilt : Their role in the relation between moral reasoning and behavior in early adolescent girls. (PhD., University of Delaware) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9540545.
McGrath, M. P., & Power, T. (1990). The effects of reasoning and choice on children’s prosocial behavior. International Journal Behavioral Development, 13, (3), 345-353.
McNamara, C. C. (2001). Friend influence on prosocial behavior : An investigation into the explanatory role of motivational factors and friendship characteristics. (PhD., University of Maryland College Park) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT3009035.
Mcmanus, J. (1993). The selp-regulation process : An exploration of gender differences in the influence of self-schema on prosocial behavior in early adolescence. (PhD., Pacific Graduate School of Psychology) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9415533.
Messner, A. L. (2000). Developing prosocial behavior in preschool children using a response cost-based intervention. (MA., University of the Pacific) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT1400393.
Metz, K. Y. (1996). Increasing prosocial behavior, anger control, and moral development in juvenile delinquents. (PhD., Ohio University) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9720994.
Mills, R. S. (1985). Praising children : The role of self-perception in the internalization of prosocial behaviour. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada).
Miller, N., & Marayana, G. (1976). Ordinal position and peer popularity. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 33, 123-131.
Mills, R. S., & Grusec, J. E. (1989). Cognitive, Affective and Behavior consequences of praising altruism. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 35, 3, 299-326.
Mogharreban, C. N. (1990). A study of the relationship between child and maternal perceptions of discipline and the incidence of prosocial behavior in young children. (PhD., Southern Illinois University at Carbondale) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9129859.
Moore, M. A. (1992). The empathy-prosocial connection:situational speci-ficity and the mediating role of empathy in children’s prosocial behavior. Unpublished master dissertation, University of Guelph (Canada).
Moore, S. G. (1982). Prosocial behavior in the early years: parent and peer influence. In B, Spodek (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Early Childhood Education (pp.65-81). New York: Free Press.
Mussen, P., & Eisenberg-Berg, N. (1977). Caring, sharing, and helping : The roots of prosocial behavior in children. San Francisco: Freeman.
Naparstek, N. (1990). Cildren’s conceptions of prosocial behavior. Child Study Journal, 20 (4), 207-221.
Otfinowski, G. A. I. (2000). Effects of empathy training on the peer approval of third graders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sanfrancisco.
Ouaou, R. H. (1999). Development of perspective taking: Applications to prosocial behavior. (PhD., Pacific Graduate School of Psychology) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9938285.
Phillipsen, L. C., Bridges, S. K., McLemore, T. G., & Saponaro, L. A. (1999) Perceptions of social behavior and peer acceptance in kindergarten. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 14 (1), 68-77.
Pianta, R. C., Stenberg, M. S., & Rollins, K. B. (1995). The first tow years of school: Teacher-child relationships and deflections in children’s classroom adjustment. Development and psychopathology, 7, 295-312.
Proctor, T. M. (1995). Gender, Generation, And the Politics of Guiding and Scouting in Interwar Britain (Boy Scouts, Girl Guides, Britain). (PhD., Rutgers the State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9618902.
Quinn-Leering, K. A. (1999). Young children’s prosocial behavior: The relationship between kindergarten teachers’beliefs and practices. (PhD., The University of Michigan) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9929930.
Radke-Yarrow, M., Zahn-Waxler, C., & Chapman, M. (1983). Prosocial dispositions and behavior. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Manual of child psychology, Vol.4: Socialization, personality, and social development. (pp.469-545).
Raviv, A., & Bar-Tal, D. (1981). Demographic correlates of adolescents helping behavior. Journal of youth and Adolescence, 10, 45-53.
Reeve, S. A. (2001). Effects of modeling, video modeling, prompting, and reinforcement strategies on increasing helping behavior in children with autism. (PhD., City University of New York) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT3008865.
Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., Van Acker, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36, 14-24.
Rosenfeld, L. B., Richman, J. M. R., & Bowen G. L. (1998). Low social support among at-risk adolescents. Social Work in Education, 20, 4, 245.
Rosenhan, D. L. (1972). Learing theory and prosocial behavior. Journal of Social Isues, 28, 151-163.
Roth, J. C. (1982). Prosocial behavior among first-second grade children in an open classroom: A field study. (PhD., Temple University) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT8210546.
Rushton, J. P. (1976). Socialization and the Altruistic Behavior of Children. Psychlogyical Bulletin, 83-5, 898-913.
Rushton, J. P. (1982). Social learning theory and the development of prosocial behavior. In N. Eisenberg, (Ed.), The development of prosocial behavior. (pp.77-108). New York: Academic Press.
Russomano, L. (2000). Achievement, locus of control, self-concept, social problem-solving training and the acquisition of prosocial skills in children. (PhD., Seton Hall University, College of Education and Human Services) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9963195.
Schad, J. E. (1994). An investigation of prosocial organizational behavior as related to organizational commitment and communication network involvement for supervisory and nonsupervisory personnel. (PhD., Gonzaga University) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9431690.
Schwartz, K. A. (2000). The role of attention and salience of standards in the development of self-regulation in childred. (PhD., Pacific Graduate School of Psychology) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9978701.
Sebanc, A. M. (1999). Friendship experiences among preschool children: Links with prosocial behavior and aggression. (PhD., University of Minnesota) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9937891.
Seher, K. M. (2000). Teaching social skills in a cooperative learning environment. (MA., Pacific Lutheran university) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT1400454.
Serow, R. C., & Dreyden, J. I. (1990). Community service among college and university students: Individual and institutional relationships. Adolescence, 25 (99), 553-567.
Service, V. (1991). Book reviews. British Journal of Psychology, 82(1), 115-117.
Shaffer, D. R. (1979). Social and Personality Development. Monterey, California.
Shaffer, D. R., & Smith, J. D. (1987). Self-consciousness, Self-reported altruism and helping behavior. Social Behavior and personality, 15, 215-220.
Sharabany, R., & Bar-Tal, (1982). Theroies of the development of altruism: review, comparison, and integration. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 5, 49-80.
Sharabany, R., Gershoni, R., & Hoffman, J. E. (1981). Girl friend, boy friend: Age and sex differences in intimate friendship. Developmental psychology, 17. 800-808.
Smith, B. W. (2000). Problem behavior within the context of peer delivered sonsequences. (PhD., University of Oregon) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9986761.
Silva Silva, C. (1997). Evaluation of prosocial behavior in older children and adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universitat De Valencia (Spain).
Silver, B. M. (1992). Changes in self-esteem, prosocial behavior, and school attitude among tutors in an elementary school peer tutoring program. (PhD., New York University ) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9237773.
Sobus, M. S. (1995). Mandating Altruism: The impact of using social constraints to elicit prosocial behavior (motivation, self determination). (PhD., The University of Nebraska-Lincoln) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9538655.
Spodek, B. (1993). Promoting prosocial behavior. In M. Kostelnik, et al (Eds.). Guiding children’s social development (pp. 407-429). New York: Delmar Publishers.
Staub, E. (1971). The Use of Role playing and Induction in Children’s Learning of Helping and Sharing Behavior. Child Development, 42, 805-816.
Staub, E. (1978). Positive social behavior and morality (vol.1). Social and personal influences. New york: Academic press.
Steblay, N. M. (1987). Helping behavior in rural and urban environments: A meta-analysis. Psychology Bulletin, 102, 346-356.
Stevens, J. D. (2000). The enhancement of prosocial decision-Making in conduct disordered adolescent males using sociomoral reasoning training. (PsyD., California School of Professional Psychology- San Diego) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9968286.
Strough, J., & Diriwachter, R.(2000). Dyad gender difference in preadolescents’ creative stories. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 43 (1-2), 43-60. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ615930).
Sturtevant, A. E. (1985). The relationship of empathy, mood, rposocial moral reasoning, and altruism in children (Helping behavior, effect, donating, sympathy). (Doctoral dissertation, New York University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46(08), 2841A.
Summers, M. (1987). Imitation, dominance, agonism and prosocial behavior: A meta-analysis of sibling behavior. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, (Baltimore. MD. April 23-26) (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 302 342)
Swap, W. C. (1991). When prosocial behavior becomes altruistic: An attributional analysis. Current Psychology, 10 (1-2), 49-65.
Tabor, C. J. (1980). Effects of age of benefactor, attractiveness of victim, and victim dependency on two kinds of prosocial behavior in children’s dyads. (PhD., University of Georgia) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT8017484.
Taleb, A., & Fathi, T. (1992). The relations between children’s self-concept and prosocial behaviors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, (PhD., University of Maryland College Park) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9234510.
Thompson, M. W. (1993). Relationship Between prosocial orientation and prosocial behavior of preschoolers. (PhD., Indiana State University) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9506186.
Ting, J. C. (1997). Helping behavior in social contexts : A case study of the Tzu-Chi Association in Taiwan. (PhD., The University of Wisconsin-Madison) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9722734.
Triver, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35-57.
Underwood, B., & Moore, B. (1982). Perspective-taking and altruism. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 143-173.
Weeks, G. C. (1994). Prosocial behavior as a function of religious settings and religiosity (helping, baptist, catholic, united methodist). (PhD., Biola University) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9524391.
Whiting, B. B., & Edwards, C. P. (1988). Children of different worlds: The formation of social behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university Press.
Wilson, D. R. (1997). A comparison of prosocial behavior of preschool children from middle class urban and suburban environments. (PhD., Temple University) UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations, NO.AAT9813567.
Yarrow, M. R., Scott, P. M., & Waxler, C. Z. (1973). Learning cocern for others. Developmental psychology, 8, 240-260.
Zahn-Waxler, C., & Radke-Yarrow, M. (1982). The development of altruism: Alternative research strategies. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), The development of prosocial behavioral. New York: Academic Press.
Zeldin, R. S. (1982). Prosocial Interactions in Two Mixed-Sex Adolescent Groups. Child Development. 53 (6), 1492-98.