馬來西亞係為多元文化且自然資源充沛之國家，生態旅遊及自然資源管理發展良好，但是在環境心理學之親環境的行為研究上卻付之闕如。研究者從小成長在華人新村，這是華人祖先在移民到馬來西亞時，就已經建立的聚落，然而華人從中國祖籍地南渡至今，超過半個世紀，研究者係為馬來西亞第四代的華人，也是一位馬來西亞的青年。馬來西亞經過快速的發展，經濟優渥、社會狀況良好，也讓研究者深受良好教育。在世代高等教育已經非常普遍之際，當代教育是否影響了馬來西亞華人青年對自然的瞭解不可而知。本研究旨在調查馬來西亞高等教育華人青年自然關聯性以及其如何影響親環境行為之路徑，希望在生態旅遊、自然資源管理之外，也能透過教育與溝通管道，推動環境教育之總體營造。
本研究採用自編量表，係以Nisbet （2009）的自然關聯性量表和新生態典範量表（Dunlap et al., 2000）為主軸，進行自然關聯性的觀點（自然的外部世界觀）、自然關聯性的經驗（與自然的物理關係）、自然關聯性的情感（內在認同的情感）之分析，並且運用了Kaiser（1998）所發展的生態行為量表進行親環境行之分析。最後，利用量化的方式進行分析，找出自然關聯性與親環境行為之關係及路徑。本研究通過如社交媒體渠道、青年相關組織和現場發放等多種途徑的滾雪球方法收集青年問卷，並使用結構方程模型（SEM）進行數據分析，以探索構建個體之間的關係。
透過本研究預期能夠驗證在自然關聯性所提出的相關理論，並且進行差異性分析比較，找出相關的文化、教育、社會等背景差異依據，進行相關的研究分析探討，解決目前馬來西亞華人青年在自然關聯性與親環境行為的缺乏項目，互相學習並且對症下藥。在推動馬來西亞環境教育、生態旅遊和自然資源管理的溝通時，可透過不同媒介的環境教育傳播、方案、課程進行，希望能夠提升自然經驗的培養、情感面向的心靈提升和生態知識的學習，讓這一代青年能夠與環境互相了解邁向更永續的經濟、環境與社會發展。

Malaysia is a multicultural and natural resource-rich country. Ecotourism and natural resource management are well developed, but there is no such thing as a study of the behavioral environment of environmental psychology. The researchers grew up in the Chinese Village. This was a settlement that Chinese ancestors had already established when they immigrated to Malaysia. After rapid development, Malaysia has enjoyed excellent economic conditions and good social conditions. It also allows researchers to be well educated. It is unclear whether contemporary education has affected Malaysian Chinese youth's understanding of nature. The purpose of this study is to investigate the nature relatedness (NR) of Chinese youth in Malaysian higher education and how they influence the Pro-Environmental Behavior (PEB).
In this study, a self-compiled scale was used, using the Nisbet (2009) the Nature Relatedness Scale and the New Ecological Canonical Scale (Dunlap et al., 2000) as the main axis to carry out the concept of Nature Perception (natural external world view), The analysis of nature experiences (physical relations with nature), natural related affect (positive and negative emotions of internal recognition), and the use of the ecological behavior scale developed by Kaiser (1998) analysis. Finally, the use of quantitative analysis, to find out the relationship between natural and pro-environmental behavior and the path. This study collected youth questionnaires through snowballing methods such as social media, youth organizations, and on-site distribution. Data analysis was conducted using the covariance infrastructure equation model to explore the relationship between constructing individuals.
Through this study, it is detected that the relevant theories proposed in the nature relatedness could be verified, and the differences in analysis and comparison could be made to find relevant backgrounds for cultural, educational, social, and other background differences. Relevant research and analysis could be conducted to address current Malaysian Chinese youth since they could be in lack of project practices of nature relatedness and pro-environmental behaviors. Finally, in the emotionally oriented spirit of spiritual education and ecological knowledge education, this generation of Chinese young people can understand each other toward more sustainable economic, environmental, and social development.

參考文獻
一、中文文獻
王順美（2014）。探索環境教育的背景脈絡及其概念。教育論叢 ，2014（2），1-16。
林秀珍（2007）。 經驗與教育探微：杜威 （J. Dewey） 教育哲學之詮釋。師大師苑有限公司。
溫從雷（2006）。馬來西亞環境教育政策與實踐探析。《世界教育信息》，12，12-14頁。
趙玉（2007）。儒、道、釋-三種相異而互補的自然生態觀。山西師大學報 （社會科學版）， 48-51.
二、英文文獻
Ajzen, I. (2006). Constructing a TPB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Retrieved April 1, 2010.
Ardoin, N. M., Clark, C., & Kelsey, E. (2013). An exploration of future trends in environmental education research. Environmental Education Research,19(4), 499-520.
Al‐Damkhi, A. M. (2008). Environmental ethics in Islam: principles, violations, and future perspectives. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 65(1), 11-31.
Allen, J. B., & Ferrand, J. L. (1999). Environmental locus of control, sympathy, and proenvironmental behavior: A test of Geller's actively caring hypothesis. Environment and Behavior, 31(3), 338-353.
Axelrod, L. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1993). Responding to environmental concerns: What factors guide individual action?. Journal of environmental psychology, 13(2), 149-159.
Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology,27(1),14-25.
Bragg, E. A. (1996). Towards ecological self: Deep ecology meets constructionist self-theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(2), 93-108.
Bragg, R., Wood, C., Barton, J., & Pretty, J. (2013). Measuring connection to nature in children aged 8-12: A robust methodology for the RSPB. Epublication https://www. rspb. org. uk/Images/methodology-report_tcm9-354606. pdf (accessed December 2015).
Carlson, N. R. (2004). Physiologische Psychologie (Vol. 8). München: Pearson Studium.
Cervinka, R., Röderer, K., & Hefler, E. (2012). Are nature lovers happy? On various indicators of well-being and connectedness with nature. Journal of Health Psychology, 17(3), 379-388.
Chawla, L. (1999). Life paths into effective environmental action. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(1), 15-26.
Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015.
Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Descriptive social norms as underappreciated sources of social control. Psychometrika, 72(2), 263.
Clayton, S. D., & Opotow, S. (Eds.). (2003). Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Collado, S., Staats, H., & Corraliza, J. A. (2013). Experiencing nature in children's summer camps: Affective, cognitive and behavioural consequences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33, 37-44.
Declaration, T. (1978). Toward an action plan: A report on the Tbilisi Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Department of Statistics Malaysia (2017).取自http//pqi.stats.gov.my/searchBI.php?tahun=2010&kodData=1&kodJadual=1&kodCiri=7&kodNegeri=00
Dolphijn, R., & Van Der Tuin, I. (2012). Introduction: A "New Tradition" in thought. New Materialism: Interviews and Cartographies, 85-92.
D'Souza, C., Taghian, M., & Khosla, R. (2007). Examination of environmental beliefs and its impact on the influence of price, quality and demographic characteristics with respect to green purchase intention. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 15(2), 69-78.
Fryxell, G. E., & Lo, C. W. (2003). The influence of environmental knowledge and values on managerial behaviours on behalf of the environment: An empirical examination of managers in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(1), 45-69.
Foo, K. Y. (2013). A vision on the role of environmental higher education contributing to the sustainable development in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 61, 6-12.
Gibbs, J. P. (1965). Norms: The problem of definition and classification. American Journal of Sociology, 70(5), 586-594.
Guagnano, G. A., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995). Influences on attitude-behavior relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and behavior, 27(5), 699-718.
Han, H., Hwang, J., & Lee, S. (2017). Cognitive, affective, normative, and moral triggers of sustainable intentions among convention-goers. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 51, 1-13.
Haron, S. A., Paim, L., & Yahaya, N. (2005). Towards sustainable consumption: an examination of environmental knowledge among Malaysians. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29(5), 426-436.
Heidi, M., and Yee, F. Y. (2002). Malaysia. New York: Benchmark Books: 28, 36-37.k
Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of environmental education, 18(2), 1-8.
Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. The journal of environmental education, 21(3), 8-21.
Johnson, D. L., Ambrose, S. H., Bassett, T. J., Bowen, M. L., Crummey, D. E., Isaacson, J. S., ... & Winter-Nelson, A. E. (1997). Meanings of environmental terms. Journal of Environmental Quality, 26(3), 581-589.
Kaiser, F. G., & Fuhrer, U. (1996). Dwelling: Speaking of an unnoticed universal language. New Ideas in Psychology, 14(3), 225-236.
Kaiser, F. G. (1998). A general measure of ecological behavior. Journal of applied social psychology, 28(5), 395-422.
Kaiser, F. G., & Fuhrer, U. (2003). Ecological behavior's dependency on different forms of knowledge. Applied Psychology, 52(4), 598-613.
Kals, E., Schumacher, D., & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31, 178-202.
Kaplan, H., Hill, K., Lancaster, J., & Hurtado, A. M. (2000). A theory of human life history evolution: diet, intelligence, and longevity. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 9(4), 156-185.
Kellert, S. R. (2002). Experiencing nature: Affective, cognitive, and evaluative development in children. Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations, 117151.
Keoy, K. H., Padzil, H., & Nari, A. J. (2011). Sustainable education: an assessment of carbon footprint at UCSI. In 3rd International Conference on Information and Financial Engineering. IACSIT Press, Singapore (pp. 342-347).
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260.
Khosla, V. (2000). U.S. Patent No. 6,080,063. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Kamla, R., Gallhofer, S., & Haslam, J. (2006, September). Islam, nature and accounting: Islamic principles and the notion of accounting for the environment. In Accounting Forum (Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 245-265). Elsevier.
Marcinkoski, T. J. (1998). An analysis of correlates and predictor of environment behavior. Journal of Dissertation Abstracts International, 49(12), 36-67.
Maloney, M. P., Ward, M. P., & Braucht, G. N. (1975). A revised scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. American Psychologist, 30(7), 787.
Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals' feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503-515.
Meneses, G. D. (2010). Refuting fear in heuristics and in recycling promotion. Journal of Business Research, 63(2), 104-110. Malaysia State Gov. (2010). 取自:http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2777.htm
Meneses, G. D. (2010). Refuting fear in heuristics and in recycling promotion. Journal of Business Research, 63(2), 104-110.
Ministry of Education, Putrajaya, Malaysia. 2007. National Education Blue-print, Malaysia: Education Planning, Research and Development.
Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia（2009） Quality Assurance Division - Position Paper for a National Qualifications Framework Retrieved from http://www.mqa.gov.my:80/borang/kerangka_BI_FA.pdf
Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715-740.
Nisbet, E. K., & Zelenski, J. M. (2013). The NR-6: a new brief measure of nature relatedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 813:1-11.
Oskamp, S. (2000). A sustainable future for humanity? How can psychology help?. American Psychologist, 55(5), 496.
Pickett-Baker, J., & Ozaki, R. (2008). Pro-environmental products: marketing influence on consumer purchase decision. Journal of consumer marketing, 25(5), 281-293.
Roszak, T. (1992). The voice of the earth: Discovering the ecological ego. Trumpeter, 9(1).
Russell, J. A., & Lanius, U. F. (1984). Adaptation level and the affective appraisal of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4(2), 119-135.
Singh, H. R., & Rahman, S. A. (2012). An approach for environmental education by non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in biodiversity conservation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 42, 144-152.
Selvaratnam, V. (2016). Malaysia's higher education and quest for developed nation status by 2020. Southeast Asian Affairs, 2016(1), 199-221.
Salleh, N. M., & Zainal, K. (2010). How and why the visually impaired students socially behave the way they do. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 859-863.
Schultz, W. (2000). Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 391-406.
Schultz, P. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In Psychology of Sustainable Development (pp. 61-78). New York: Springer.
Smith, S. M., Haugtvedt, C. P., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Attitudes and recycling: does the measurement of affect enhance behavioral prediction?. Psychology & Marketing, 11(4), 359-374.
Smith, J. R., Louis, W. R., Terry, D. J., Greenaway, K. H., Clarke, M. R., & Cheng, X. (2012). Congruent or conflicted? The impact of injunctive and descriptive norms on environmental intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 353-361.
Stapp, W. B. (‎1974). Environmental Education Activities Manual. Farmington Hills, Michigan, Thomson-Shore.
Steg, L. (2005). Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(2-3), 147-162. Szagun, G., & Pavlov, V. I. (1995). Environmental awareness: A comparative study of German and Russian adolescents. Youth & Society, 27(1), 93-112.
Thurstone, L. L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. American Journal of Sociology, 33(4), 529-554.
The World Fact Book: Malaysia(2006). CIA.取自:https://www.cia.gov/library /publications/the-world-factbook/geos/my
UNESCO, U. (1976). The Belgrade Charter. Connect UNESCO-UNEP Environ. Educ. News l, 1, 1-2.
UNESCO(1990). The Talloires Declaration. Retrieved from http://www.ulsf.org/ programs_tallories.html
United Nations (1993). Agenda 21: The United Nations Programme of Action.
Vining, J., Ebreo, A., Bechtel, R. B., & Churchman, A. (2002). Emerging theoretical and methodological perspectives on conservation behaviour. Urbana, 51, 61801.
Wells, N. M., & Lekies, K. S. (2006). Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children Youth and Environments, 16(1), 1-24.
Whitmarsh, L., & O'Neill, S. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 305-314.
Wood, W., Quinn, J. M., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). Habits in everyday life: Thought, emotion, and action. Journal of personality and social psychology, 83(6), 1281.
Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. MESA press.
Young J (2011) Personal Communication. Art of Mentoring Workshop, Santa Cruz.

Zainal, K., & Salleh, N. M. (2010). Ethnic relation among the youth in Malaysia: toward fulfilling the concept of one Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 855-858
Zylstra, M. J., Knight, A. T., Esler, K. J., & Le Grange, L. L. (2014). Connectedness as a core conservation concern: An interdisciplinary review of theory and a call for practice. Springer Science Reviews, 2(1-2), 119-143.