從一出生我們每天都在面對新的知識、新的科技、新的世界，在這知識經濟的時代裡，「學習」是我們從小到大都在進行的事情。過去我們在學校接受的教育，往往都是老師透過傳統講述式的教學方法傳遞知識，讓我們學會什麼，而忽視了我們思考的環節，在接受知識的過程中少了反思與釐清，多半是囫圇吞棗的吸收知識；考試時，透過海量題目的訓練，讓我們看到題目就知道該怎麼進行下一步，並反射寫出答案。但這樣的學習方式，在進入職場後，面對各式各樣的問題時，常讓我們 措手不及，因為過去的我們，接受了將近 20 年的填鴨式教育，只教會我們學術理 論知識，而忽略了思考與應用知識理論去解決問題的能力。

教育的目的在於培養學生解決問題的能力，而 PBL(Problem-Based Learning) 問題導向教學有別於傳統講述式的教學方法，以問題引導促使學生思考，學習者自己尋找解答並透過團體討論解決問題，訓練學習者思考與主動學習之能力，有助於未來職場面對問題時能夠迎刃而解。

本研究以國立臺灣師範大學管理學院修習《管理專題研討》課程的碩士畢業生與在校學生為研究對象，探究 PBL 施行於「新創事業評估課程」老師的教學狀況與學生的學習反應，透過個人深度訪談方式，瞭解學生對於 PBL 的看法。而本研究發現到學生對於 PBL 教學方法的接受度是高的，在知識的學習、培養人格和做事能力上，以及對於學涯與未來職涯的影響，受訪者給予的回饋都是正向的。但本研究僅以兩屆學生為研究對象，蒐集到的資料可能較為局限。未來在同樣的教學架構下，可對於不同年齡層、族群、學科背景的學生進行追蹤研究。

We have been facing new knowledge, new technology, and new world every day since we were born. In this era of knowledge economy, "learning" is what we have been doing since childhood. In the past, the education we received in schools was often based on teachers. They passed knowledge through traditional teaching methods, letting us know what to learn, and neglecting our thinking links. In the process of receiving knowledge, there was less reflection and clarification, and most of the knowledge was swallowed without understanding. In the exam, through the training of large number of questions, we can see the question and know how to proceed, and write the answer in reflection. But this kind of learning method often caught us off guard when faced with various problems after entering the workplace. Because in the past, we received nearly 20 years of cramming education, which only taught us academic theoretical knowledge and ignored the ability of thinking and applying knowledge theory to solve problems.

The purpose of education is to train the students' ability to solve the problems. PBL (Problem-Based Learning) is different from traditional teaching methods. It uses problem-based guidance to encourage students to think, learners find answers themselves and solve problems through group discussions. Training learners to think and learn actively will help them solve problems in the future.

The research used graduates and students of the National Taiwan Normal University School of Management who have taken the "Seminar in Management" as the research object. It explores the teaching status of teachers and students' learning responses of the PBL implemented in the "New Business Evaluation Course". In-depth interviews to understand students' views on PBL, including knowledge learning, ability to cultivate, influence on academic and career, and preference for PBL. This study found that students' acceptance of PBL teaching methods is high. The feedback given by respondents is positive in terms of knowledge learning, personality cultivation and ability to do things, as well as the impact on academic and future careers. However, this study only took two- term students as the research object, and the data collected may be more limited. In the future, under the same teaching structure, students of different age groups, ethnic groups, and academic backgrounds can be tracked.

壹、英文文獻
Albanese, M., & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: a review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine, 68(1), 52-81.
Arthur L. S., Daphne A. J., Gary C., Janice S. M., John D. B., Judi B., Max E., Melissa S. B., Tim O. P., Timothy J. K., (Oct 1, 2004). Journal of Management Education, First Published.
Bamford, D., Karjalainen, K., & Jenavs, E. (2012). An evaluation of problem-based assessment in teaching operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(12), 1493-1514.
Barrows, H. S. (1985). How to design a problem-based curriculum for the preclinical years. NY: Springer Publishing.
Carter, R.B. & Van Auken, H.E. (1992). Effect of professional background on venture capital proposal evaluation. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 3(1), 45-55.
DeFillippi, R., & Milter, R. G. (2009). Problem-based and Project-based Learning Approaches: Applying Knowledge to Authentic Situations. In S. Armstrong, & C. Fukami (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Management Learning, Education and Development (pp.344-363). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience & education. New York: Touchstone.
Dileep, H., Miller, A.T., & Bowman, E.H. (1992). Calls on high-technology: Japanese exploration of venture capital investments in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 13(2), 85-103.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem- based learning: a meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533-568.
Downing, K., Ning, F., & Shin, K. (2011). Impact of problem-based learning on student experience and meta-cognitive development. Multicultural Education and Technology Journal, 5(1), 55-69.
Freear, J., & Wetzel, W.E. (1990). Who bankrolls high-tech entrepreneurs? Journal of Business Venturing, 5, 77-89.
Fried, V., & Hisrich, R. (1994). Toward a model of venture capital investment decision making. Financial Management, 23(3), 28-37.
Gupta, A.K., & Sapienza, H.J. (1992). Determinants of venture capital firms’ preferences regarding the industry diversity and geographic scope of their investments. Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 347-362.
Haar, N.E., Starr, J., & MacMillan, I.C. (1988). Informal risk capital investors: Investment patterns on the East Coast of the U.S.A. Journal of Business Venturing, 3(1), 11-29.
Hartman, K. B., Moberg, C. R., & Lambert, J. M. (2013). Effectiveness of problem- based learning in introductory business courses. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 12, 1-13.
Hsieh, C., & Knight, L. (2008). Problem-based learning for engineering students: an evidence-based comparative study. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(1), 25-30.
Jensen, M. (2002). Securing venture capital: Today’s realities. Financial Executive, 18(6), 43-46.
MacMillan, I.C., Siegel, R., & Subba Narasimha, P.N. (1985). Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 119-128.
MacMillan, I.C., Zemann, L., & Subba Narasimha, P.N. (1987). Criteria distinguishing successful from unsuccessful ventures in the venture screening process. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(2), 123-137.
Mitchell, J. E., Canavan, B., & Smith, J. (2010). Problem-based learning in communication systems: student perceptions and achievement. IEEE Transactions on Education, 53(4), 587-594.
Patton, M. Q. (Michael Quinn Patton) (1995). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods.
52
Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. (2002). The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Learning & Education, 1(1), 78-95.
Richard Sudek, Robert Wiltbank, Stuart Read (2009). The role of prediction in new venture investing.
Stanley, T., & Marsden, S. (2012). Problem-based learning: does accounting education need it? Journal of Accounting Education, 30, 267-289.
Sudek, R. 2006. Angel investment criteria. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 17(2) , 89-103.
Tayor S.J. & Bogdan R. (1984). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods, Second Edition. London: Wilsy.
Triantis, G.G. (2001). Financial contract design in the world of venture capital. The University of Chicago Law Review, 68, 305-322.
Tyebjee, T., & Bruno, A. (1984). A model of venture capitalist investment activity. Management Science, 30(9), 1051-1066.
Van Osnabrugge, M. (1998). Do serial and non-serial investors behave differently? An empirical and theoretical analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22(4), 23-43.
Vernon, D. T. A., & Blake, R. L. (1993). Does problem-based learning work? A meta- analysis of evaluation research. Academic Medicine, 68(7), 550-563.

貳、中文文獻
吳承瑋(2010)。「問題導向學習運用於國中生活科技問題解決能力之研究」。 國立臺灣師範大學科技應用與人力資源發展學系，臺北市。
林惠敏(2010)。問題解決導向(PBL)在大學通識課程操作之檢視—以《家庭 與人際關係：經典劇本導讀》為例。國立中山大學劇場藝術學系碩士班，高雄市。
施人英、陳玠甫(2019)。《管理專題研討》課程綱要張祐誠(2019)。「以 PBL 建構高中生化學實驗課程的探討研究」。國立雲林科技大學技術與職業教育研究所，雲林縣。
黃美悧(2015)。「利用 PBL 教學策略探究國小四年級學生毛細現象之概念學習」。臺北市立大學應用物理暨化學系自然科學教學碩士學位班，臺北市。