研究生: |
陳奕廷 Chen, Yi-Ting |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
探討 NFT 融資對於消費者 NFT 購買意願之影響 Impact of NFT Financing on Consumers' NFT Purchase Intention |
指導教授: |
施人英
Shih, Jen-Ying |
口試委員: |
何宗武
HO, TSUNG-WU 施人英 Shih, Jen-Ying 江艾軒 CHIANG, AI-HSUAN |
口試日期: | 2023/07/27 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
全球經營與策略研究所 Graduate Institute of Global Business and Strategy |
論文出版年: | 2023 |
畢業學年度: | 111 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 83 |
中文關鍵詞: | NFT 、非同質化代幣 、融資 、消費者信任 、消費者態度 、購買意願 |
英文關鍵詞: | non-fungible token, NFT, financing, consumer trust, consumer attitude, purchase intention |
研究方法: | 調查研究 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202301203 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:120 下載:7 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
2021年時,非同質化代幣 ( NFT ) 走入大眾視野,這種數字資產被認為具有潛在的投資價值。而且隨著 NFT 市場的不斷發展和增長,融資行為已經成為了其中的一個重要部分。因此,將 NFT 做為抵押品去獲取資金,以便提升整體利用性及流動性,成為購買 NFT 者的其中一種要求。但因為加密市場的波動性大,以及不穩定性高,消費者對於數字資產存在著難認同且不信任,若能使 NFT 在政府的金融體制下做為抵押品,不只能夠使其在政府的監管下,增加其流動性,並完善相關法規與配套措施,就能夠推動區塊鏈更多的應用面向,使這個技術能夠被更多人了解,減少因為不熟悉、不了解這個產業而造成的犯罪行為。讓消費者對數字資產有更高的認同,進而增加購買意願,會是讓大眾更能夠認可的一個因素。
本研究旨在探討 NFT 的融資對消費者的態度與消費者的信任之間的關係,透過購買過 NFT 的消費者以及對 NFT 融資的認知,進一步是否會因 NFT 的融資而對其產生購買意願。本研究採用問卷調查法,於 2023 年 6 月 12 日至 2023 年 7 月 12 日之間,一共蒐集了 289 份問卷,替除了無效問卷 32 份,有效問卷 257 份,運用 SPSS 以及 AMOS 統計分析工具進行分析。
本研究綜合研究結果,表明 NFT 融資認知對消費者對於 NFT 的信任以及態度有著正向關係,而消費者的信任以及態度對購買意願也有著正向的關係,越能夠了解NFT 的融資認知,對 NFT 的購買意願就會上升。根據本研究結果,可以在未來金融體制想要針對數字資產的融資面向與消費者關係做探討時,能夠參考運用。
In 2021, non-fungible tokens ( NFT ) have become popular cryptocurrency assets, and this digital asset is considered to have potential investment value. With the continuous development and growth of the NFT market, financing behavior has become an important part of it. Therefore, using NFT as collateral to obtain funds in order to improve overall utilization and liquidity has become one of the requirements for buyers of NFT. However, due to the high volatility and instability of the encryption market, consumers difficulty recognize and distrust digital assets. If NFT can be used as collateral under the government's financial system, it will not only increase its liquidity under the government's supervision but also improve relevant regulations and supporting measures. It will be able to promote more application-oriented blockchains so that this technology can be understood by more people and reduce crimes caused by unfamiliarity and ignorance of this industry. Consumers have higher recognition of digital assets and then increase their willingness to buy, which will be a factor that can be more recognized by the public.
This study aims to explore the relationship between NFT financing and consumers' trust and attitude. Through consumers who have purchased NFT and their cognition of NFT financing, whether they will be willing to purchase due to NFT financing. This study adopts the questionnaire survey method. Between June 12, 2023 and July 12, 2023, a total of 289 questionnaires were collected, 32 invalid questionnaires were replaced, and 257 valid questionnaires were used. SPSS and AMOS statistical analysis tools were used for analysis.
The comprehensive research results of this study show that NFT financing cognition has a positive relationship with consumers’ trust and attitude. Consumers’ trust and attitude also have a positive relationship with purchase intention. The more you can understand NFT financing cognition, the more willingness to buy NFT will increase. According to the results of this study, it can be used as a reference when the future financial system wants to discuss the
relationship between financing and consumers of digital assets.
Amin, H., Abdul Rahman, A. R., Abdul Razak, D., & Rizal, H. (2017). Consumer attitude and preference in the Islamic mortgage sector: a study of Malaysian consumers. Management Research Review, 40(1), 95-115.
Ang, J. S., Cheng, Y., & Wu, C. (2014). Does Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Matter in China? Evidence from Financing and Investment Choices in the High-Tech Industry. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(2), 332-348. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00372
Asiegbu, I. F., Powei, D., & Iruka, C. H. (2012). Consumer attitude: Some reflections on its concept, trilogy, relationship with consumer behavior, and marketing implications. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(13), 38-50.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Burnkrant, R. E. (1979). Attitude organization and the attitude–behavior relationship. Journal of personality and social psychology, 37(6), 913.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16, 74-94.
Belkaoui, A. R. (1992). Accounting theory (ed.). London ua.
Brennan, L. (2009). Intellectual Property Financing: an Overview. UNCITRAL-Third International Colloquium on Secured Transactions, WIPO,
Canibano, L., Garcia-Ayuso, M., & Sanchez, P. (2000). Accounting for intangibles: A literature review Journal of Accounting Literature, vol. 19. ABI/INFORM Global pg, 102.
Cardoso, A., Paulauskaitė, A., Hachki, H., Figueiredo, J., Oliveira, I., Rêgo, R., Silva, R., & Meirinhos, G. (2022). Analysis of the Impact of Airbnb Brand Personality on Consumer Involvement and Institutional Trust. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 104.
Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: the role of brand loyalty. Journal of marketing, 65(2), 81-93.
Chiu, I. H., & Allen, J. G. (2022). Exploring the Assetisation and Financialisation of Non-fungible Tokens (NFTs): Opportunities and Regulatory Implications. Banking and Finance Law Revuew, Summer.
Cobb-Walgren, C. J., Ruble, C. A., & Donthu, N. (1995). Brand equity, brand preference, and purchase intent. Journal of advertising, 24(3), 25-40.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
Crosby, L. A., & Ghanbarpour, T. (2023). The Drucker intangibles measurement system: An academic perspective. Journal of business research, 155, 113452.
Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer–seller relationships. Journal of marketing, 61(2), 35-51.
Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual capital: Realizing your company's true value by finding its hidden roots. (No Title).
Fairfield, J. A. (2022). Tokenized: The law of non-fungible tokens and unique digital property. Ind. LJ, 97, 1261.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
Freyermuth, R. W., & Odinet, C. K. (2022). Crypto Finance in Real Estate Markets. U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper Forthcoming.
Gamel, J., Bauer, A., Decker, T., & Menrad, K. (2022). Financing wind energy projects: An extended theory of planned behavior approach to explain private households’ wind energy investment intentions in Germany. Renewable Energy, 182, 592-601.
Gleich, C., & Gebert, M. (2022). The Collector 3.0-A Psychological Framework for Successful Digital Asset Launches. Available at SSRN 4250370.
Gordon V. Smith (Author), R. L. P. A. (2000). Valuation of Intellectual Property and Intangible Assets.
Gupta, S., Gallear, D., Rudd, J., & Foroudi, P. (2020). The impact of brand value on brand competitiveness. Journal of business research, 112, 210-222.
Hess, J., & Story, J. (2005). Trust‐based commitment: multidimensional consumer‐brand relationships. Journal of consumer Marketing, 22(6), 313-322.
Hess, J. S. (1995). Construction and assessment of a scale to measure consumer trust. American Marketing Association,
Hong, I. B., & Cho, H. (2011). The impact of consumer trust on attitudinal loyalty and purchase intentions in B2C e-marketplaces: Intermediary trust vs. seller trust. International journal of information management, 31(5), 469-479.
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as ecology. Harvard business review, 82(3), 68-78, 126.
Jones, R. (2005). Finding sources of brand value: Developing a stakeholder model of brand equity. Journal of brand management, 13, 10-32.
Kapferer, J.-N. (2005). The post-global brand. Journal of brand management, 12(5), 319-324.
Kräussl, R., & Tugnetti, A. (2022). Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): A review of pricing determinants, applications and opportunities. Applications and Opportunities (May 17, 2022).
Lev, B., & Gu, F. (2016). The end of accounting and the path forward for investors and managers. John Wiley & Sons.
Lim, S. C., Macias, A. J., & Moeller, T. (2020). Intangible assets and capital structure. Journal of Banking & Finance, 118, 105873.
Lim, Y. J., Osman, A., Salahuddin, S. N., Romle, A. R., & Abdullah, S. (2016). Factors influencing online shopping behavior: the mediating role of purchase intention. Procedia economics and finance, 35, 401-410.
Lv, Z., Jin, Y., & Huang, J. (2021). MGC, consumers’ engagement with MGC, WOM and consumers’ purchase intention: the case of Weibo platform. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 19, 495-516.
Malter, M. S., Holbrook, M. B., Kahn, B. E., Parker, J. R., & Lehmann, D. R. (2020). The past, present, and future of consumer research. Marketing Letters, 31, 137-149.
Mazur, M. (2021). Non-fungible tokens (NFT). The analysis of risk and return. Available at SSRN 3953535.
McGrath, J. M. (2005). A pilot study testing aspects of the integrated marketing communications concept. Journal of Marketing Communications, 11(3), 191-214.
Meyns, S. C., & Dalipi, F. (2022). What users tweet on NFTs: mining Twitter to understand NFT-related concerns using a topic modeling approach. IEEE access, 10, 117658-117680.
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of marketing, 58(3), 20-38.
Moringiello, J. M., & Odinet, C. K. (2022). Blockchain Real Estate and NFTs. William & Mary Law Review, Forthcoming, U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper(2022-16).
Musan, D. I., William, J., & Gervais, A. (2020). NFT. finance leveraging non-fungible tokens. Imperial College London, Department of Computing.
O’Dair, M., & Beaven, Z. (2017). The networked record industry: How blockchain technology could transform the record industry. Strategic Change, 26(5), 471-480.
Ramanathan, U., Williams, N. L., Zhang, M., Sa-nguanjin, P., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Borges, L. A. (2020). A new perspective of e-trust in the era of social media: insights from customer satisfaction data. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(4), 1417-1431.
Shah, S. S. H., Aziz, J., Jaffari, A. R., Waris, S., Ejaz, W., Fatima, M., & Sherazi, S. K. (2012). The impact of brands on consumer purchase intentions. Asian Journal of Business Management, 4(2), 105-110.
Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J., & Sabol, B. (2002). Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. Journal of marketing, 66(1), 15-37.
Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of retailing, 77(2), 203-220.
Trautman, L. J. (2021). Virtual art and non-fungible tokens. Hofstra L. Rev., 50, 361.
Wang, J., Shahzad, F., & Ashraf, S. F. (2023). Elements of information ecosystems stimulating the online consumer behavior: A mediating role of cognitive and affective trust. Telematics and Informatics, 80, 101970.
Yoo, B., & Donthu, N. (2001). Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of business research, 52(1), 1-14.
Yuwen, H., Guanxing, S., & Qiongwei, Y. (2022). Consumers’ Perceived Trust Evaluation of Cross-border E-commerce Platforms in the Context of Socialization. Procedia Computer Science, 199, 548-555.
Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H.-N., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2018). Blockchain challenges and opportunities: A survey. International journal of web and grid services, 14(4), 352-375.
杜宏毅. (2017). 區塊鏈的前世今生. https://www.facebook.com/groups/1635383210119188/
徐鈺娟. (2022). 探討民眾對於簽署電子同意書的使用意願: 擴充解構式計畫行為理論之觀點 嘉南藥理大學]. 台南市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/kc9ewb
陳昱頤. (2022). 品牌價值、美感素養與賦能性影響使用者購買非同質化代幣(NFT)之研究 國立臺灣藝術大學]. 新北市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3j8s2r
黃馨儀. (2021). 品牌價值、品牌知名度、品牌形象與消費者再購意願之研究-以澎湖優鮮為例 國立澎湖科技大學]. 澎湖縣. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/23phxc
謝宜蓁. (2018). 知覺價值對名牌包購買意願之影響–以參考群體與炫耀性消費為干擾變項 淡江大學]. 新北市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/r4kdtb
台北產經, (2017) ,區塊鏈革命,迎向產業新契機 (2/05)
https://www.taipeiecon.taipei/article_cont.aspx?MmmID=1201&MSid=745576501150054077
高曼資本, (2022),區塊鏈 PoW, PoS,DPoS 是什麼 ? (2/05)
https://linktr.ee/gamma.paradigm.com
徐明星、劉勇、段新星、郭大治, (2016)
區塊鏈革命:中介消失的未來,改寫商業規則,興起社會變革,經濟大洗牌 (2/05)
https://www.books.com.tw/products/0010738707
CryptoBriefing, (2022),2022 年幣圈 10 大事件回顧》驚心動魄之下,尚存溫暖曙光 (2/07)
https://blockcast.it/2022/12/19/the-top-10-crypto-moments-of-the-year/
Crypto, (2022),Consensus Mechanisms in Blockchain: A Beginner’s Guide (2/07)
https://crypto.com/university/consensus-mechanisms-in-blockchain
Kaven Choi, (2018),Tracking ERC-721 non-fungible token on Etherscan (2/07)
https://medium.com/etherscan-blog/tracking-erc-721-non-fungible-token-on-etherscan-b4da1ed955ed
Opensea,(2/07)
https://opensea.io/
亞律國際 ( 2013 ),淺談智慧財產權鑑價 (2/10)
https://www.asialiuh.com/zh-tw/news.php?act=view&id=391
Mr.Market ( 2022 ),DeFi是什麼?去中心化金融DeFi跟CeFi差別在哪? (2/10)
https://rich01.com/what-is-defi/
Gartner ( 2021 ),Hype Cycle for Blockchain 2021; More Action than Hype (2/21)
https://blogs.gartner.com/avivah-litan/2021/07/14/hype-cycle-for-blockchain-2021-more-action-than-hype/
汪志堅(2017)。消費者行為。台北市 : 前程文化。
https://consumer.concepts.tw/%E9%A6%96%E9%A0%81
Cointelegraph ( 2021 ),Second-largest US mortgage lender UWM dumps Bitcoin payment plans
https://cointelegraph.com/news/second-largest-us-mortgage-lender-uwm-dumps-bitcoin-payment-plans
The New York Time ( 2021 ),How ‘Put That on Top Shot!’ Became a New N.B.A. Mantra
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/13/business/nba-top-shot-moments.html
聯合新聞網 ( 2021 ) ,藝術品的前世今生
https://udn.com/news/story/6868/5869238
The Block Data
https://www.theblock.co/data/crypto-markets/spot