學生出題可以幫助學生對學習內容有更深入的了解，從被動地獲得知識，轉換成主動的使用知識，也能將所學的知識內容，結合學生的自身經驗，發展到高層次的思考。然而，出題過程可能需要鷹架輔助，因此，本研究設計一個「出題鷹架系統」，透過PIRLS閱讀理解四層次的鷹架和範例學習，讓學生進行出題。透過文本範例的教學，學習PIRLS閱讀理解層次，利用鷹架的給予，引導學生能從低層次的思考慢慢提升到高層次的思考，以及促進學生的閱讀理解。
本研究旨在探討透過出題鷹架系統學習後，學生在閱讀理解學習成就、學習動機、學習興趣的影響。以國小六年級學生為研究對象，透過不同的故事體文本，讓學生進行四週的出題鷹架系統學習。研究結果顯示：(1)透過出題鷹架系統的學習，學生在閱讀理解的學習成就上無明顯的差異 (2)透過出題鷹架系統的學習，有6成的學生表示有助於促進學習動機 (3)透過出題鷹架系統的學習，有5成的學生表示有助於促進學習興趣。

In the past, teachers asked students to use exercises as a learning assessment, which led students to not care whether they understood the learning content or to know their learning difficulties. This study hopes to enhance students' thinking ability through student question-generation. It will expose students' learning comprehension by letting students explain their own problems and explain whether the questions and answers they create are correct. Student question-generation can promote students' reading comprehension. In order to have deeper reading and understanding for students, this study provide a "scaffolding system" for students to practice four-level reading comprehension of PIRLS. Through the teaching of examples, use the scaffolding to guide students from low-level thinking to high-level thinking, and promote students' reading comprehension.
The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of reading comprehension on learning achievement, learning motivation, and learning interest through the scaffolding system. The participants are the sixth grade elementary students, using the scaffolding system in four weeks. The results of the study showed that: (1) after using the scaffolding system, the students had no significant improvement in the learning achievement of reading comprehension (2) after using scaffolding system, 60% of the students expressed its helpfulness in terms of motivation (3) after using the scaffolding system, 50% of the students expressed it is helpful in terms of learning interest.

一、中文文獻
立原繪里花 (2016)。白雪公主。台北市：親子天下。
卡蜜拉．狄梅柯 (2011)。艾拉第一次上台。台北市：小天下。
安娜．坎普 (2011)。小狗比飛跳芭蕾。台北市：親子天下。
李明桓 (2010)。線上學生出題題型在國小社會學習領域學習效果之研究。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南市。
邱廷榮、于富雲 (2011)。網路學生出題策略應用於國小古典詩課程其成效之研究。教育科學研究期刊，56(4)，99-128。
林宜篇 (2011)。網路學生出題融入生命教育教學對國小學生學習成效之影響。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南市。
阿部夏丸 (2007)。蝌蚪運動會。彰化縣：和融出版社。
柯華葳 (2009)。臺灣四年級學生閱讀素養PIRLS 2006報告。取自 https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxyZWFkaW5nOGxlYXJuaW5nMDF8Z3g6NjNlYTc2OTU1OGQ1ZjE4ZA
教育部（2008）。97年國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。取自 https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/73/pta_1560_9340534_17125.doc
教育部 (2016)。資訊教育總藍圖。取自http://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/3/relfile/6315/46563/65ebb64a-683c-4f7a-bcf0-325113ddb436.pdf
許育健 (2015)。高效閱讀：閱讀理解問思教學。台北市：幼獅文化。
陳怡君 (2010)。學生網路出題結合練習活動對國小學童社會學習領域學習成效之影響。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南市。
陳欣希、許育健、林意雪 (2014)。有效提問：閱讀好故事、設計好問題，陪孩子一起探索自我。台北市：親子天下。
陳德懷 (2016)。趣創者國際實驗教育。取自https://tw.idcedu.org/
張靜儀 (2005)。國小自然科教學個案研究-ARCS 動機模式解析。科學教育學刊，13(2)，191-216。
黃龍翔、陳德懷、陳志洪、廖長彦 (2016)。趣創者理論：興趣與興趣環。取自第20屆全球華人計算機教育應用大會。https://www.eduhk.hk/gccce2016/proceedings/2GCCCE2016WorkshopProceedings.pdf
葉家忠 (2001)。出題與同儕評題支援系統之設計及評估。國立中央大學資訊工程研究所碩士論文，未出版，桃園市。
楊晏婷 (2011)。瀏覽出題機制融入網路學生出題歷程對國中英語學習影響之探 究。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南市。
碧雅翠絲．芳塔內 (2010)。我的朋友小結巴。台北市：阿布拉。
劉思源 (2006)。短耳兔。台北市：親子天下。
潘冠蓉 (2012)。線上學生出題關鍵詞提示策略對國中生公民學習成效影響之研究。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南市。
鄭圓鈴 (2013)。有效閱讀：閱讀理解，如何學？怎麼教？。台北市：親子天下。

二、英文文獻
Barak, M. ,& Rafaeli,S. (2004). On-line question-posing and peer-assessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning. International. Journal. of Human-Computer Studies, 61(1), 84-103.
Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer learning and assessment. Assessment & evaluation in higher education, 24(4), 413-426.
Chan, T. W., Looi, C. K., Chen, W., Wong, L. H., Chang, B., Liao, C. C., Y., Cheng, H. N. H., Chen, Z. H., Liu, C. C., Kong, S. C., Jeong, H., Mason, J., So, H. J., Murthy, S., Yu, F. Y., Wong, S. L., King, R. B., Gu, X., Wang, M., Wu, L., Huang, R., Rachel Lam, R., & Ogata, H. (2018). Interest-driven creator theory: towards a theory of learning design for Asia in the twenty-first century. Journal of Computers in Education, 5(4), 435-461.
Denny, P., Hamer, J., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Purchase, H. (2008, September). PeerWise: students sharing their multiple choice questions. In Proceedings of the fourth international. workshop on computing education research (pp. 51-58). ACM.
Fellenz, M. R. (2004). Using assessment to support higher level learning: the multiple choice item development assignment. Assessment & Eval.uation in Higher Education, 29(6), 703-719.
Hsu, C. C., & Wang, T. I. (2018). Applying game mechanics and student-generated questions to an online puzzle-based game learning system to promote algorithmic thinking skills. Computers & Education, 121, 73-88.
King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American educational research journal, 31(2), 338-368.
Lan, Y. F., & Lin, P. C. (2011). Eval.uation and improvement of student's question- posing ability in a web-based learning environment. Austral.asian Journal of Educational. Technology, 27(4).
Lin, S. S., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web‐based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(4), 420-432.
Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (1996). The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3), 239- 250.
Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of educational research, 66(2), 181-221.
Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of educational. Research, 68(3), 249-276.
Wilson, E. V. (2004). ExamNet asynchronous learning network: augmenting face-to-face courses with student-developed exam questions. Computers & Education, 42(1), 87-107.
Wong, B. Y. (1985). Self-questioning instructional. research: A review. Review of Educational. Research, 55(2), 227-268.
Yeh, H. C., & Lai, P. Y. (2012). Implementing online question generation to foster reading comprehension. Austral.asian Journal. of Educational. Technology, 28(7).
Yu, F. Y. (2009). Scaffolding student-generated questions: Design and development of a customizable online learning system. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(5), 1129-1138.
Yu, F. Y. (2011). Multiple peer-assessment modes to augment online student question-generation processes. Computers & Education, 56(2), 484-494.
Yu, F. Y., & Chen, Y. J. (2014). Effects of student‐generated questions as the source of online drill‐and‐practice activities on learning. British Journal. of Educational. Technology, 45(2), 316-329.
Yu, F. Y., & Liu, Y. H. (2009). Creating a psychological.ly safe online space for a student‐generated questions learning activity via different identity revelation modes. British Journal. of Educational. Technology, 40(6), 1109-1123.
Yu, F. Y., & Wu, C. P. (2016). The effects of an online student-constructed test strategy on knowledge construction. Computers & Education, 94, 89-101.
Yu, F. Y., Liu, Y. H., & Chan, T. W. (2005). A web‐based learning system for question‐ posing and peer assessment. Innovations in education and teaching international., 42(4), 337-348.
Yu, F. Y., Tsai, H. C., & Wu, H. L. (2013). Effects of online procedural. scaffolds and the timing of scaffolding provision on elementary Taiwanese students' question-generation in a science class. Austral.asian Journal. of Educational. Technology, 29(3).