研究生: |
丁美枝 Ting, Mei-Chih |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
不同教學媒體對國中學生學習「原子結構」之成效 Effects of Instructional Media on Students Learning of Atomic Structure for the Eighth Graders |
指導教授: |
李田英
Lee, Tein-Ying |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科學教育研究所 Graduate Institute of Science Education |
論文出版年: | 2002 |
畢業學年度: | 90 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 114 |
中文關鍵詞: | 教學媒體 、原子結構 |
英文關鍵詞: | instructional media, atomic structure |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:304 下載:35 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究探討不同教學媒體(科學史課文、理化課文、錄影帶)對國中學生學習原子結構的影響,並分析如何改進國中「原子結構」單元的教學。本研究採用準實驗研究法、晤談及問卷調查。準實驗研究樣本為桃園區某國中及台北區某國中學生共406人,將學生分為三組,先做原子結構紙筆測驗,學生於教學後,分別看錄影帶、理化課文及科學史課文(三組時間皆相同),再做後測。前後測工具為研究者自行開發,經十位理化老師審查修正,預試信度α=..87,正式施測α=..83。晤談對象是針對參與準實驗研究之教師,於研究結束後進行教學媒體使用感想及建議之訪談。問卷的樣本為台北區某國中學生共105人,學生於教學後看三種教學媒體,再做問卷。本研究結果如下:1.科學史課文組的後測及進步表現皆顯著優於理化課文組,科學史課文組在原子結構相關概念「原子的模型」學習成效比錄影帶組和理化課文組好,顯示利用科學史來改進國中原子概念的教學是有幫助的;2.後測高分組學生中科學史課文組表現優於理化課文組。但中分和低分組無顯著差異;3.理化學習低成就的學生中,二校的後測及進步表現皆是科學史課文與錄影帶表現比理化課文好,顯示使用錄影帶和科學史課文,對於理化學習低成就的學生成效比理化課文好;4.在校理化學習高成就和中成就的學生中,台北某國中的後測及進步表現皆是科學史課文優於錄影帶優於理化課文。桃園某國中錄影帶組表現不理想,晤談參與研究理化教師得知,錄影帶組的學生,後測時填答紙筆測驗的態度不積極,所以影響測驗的準確性;5.學生問卷結果顯示學生對於教學媒體錄影帶及科學史課文的使用是肯定的;6.參與研究教師表示科學史課文和錄影帶的使用可以幫助學生原子結構概念的學習。
Investigated were the effects of the text with history of science, the textbook. and videotape on students learning of atomic structure for eighth graders. Quasi-experimental design, interview and survey were adapted in this study. Four hundreds and six students from two schools located either in Taoyuan or Taipei were involved. Students were assigned into three groups purposely, namely, group A reading text with history of science, group B reading the textbook and group C watching videotape. All students had pre-test before the teaching. After teaching, they were required to watch videotape, read text with history of science, or read the traditional physical-chemistry text respectively. Then, post-test were given to all students. Teachers who help study were interviewed. Another one hundred and five students from the school in Taipei answered the questionnaire to show their feeling and recommendations about the three media. The findings were as following: 1) group A was significantly better than group B in score of the post-test and the progressed scores, group A also performed better than group B and C in concepts of atomic models; 2) group A performed better than group B among students who got high scores in post-test. However, there were no significant difference among students of middle and low scores in post-test; 3) group A and group C were better than group B for all low achievers in physical science; 4) group A performed better than group B and group C in school in Taipei for students who were high and middle achievers in their physical science. However, it was not found in Taoyuan school; 5) questionnaire results indicated that students were positive attitude toward text with history of science and videotape;6) teachers who participated in study indicated that the text with history of science and videotape could help students learn concepts of atomic structure better.
中文部分
尹基勉(民87):「原子結構」概念之建構式教學研究。國立臺灣師範大學化學研究所碩士論文。
朱則剛(民85):視聽媒體在教學上功能與角色的省思。中等教育。第47卷,第3期。p12-15。
李玉貞(民89):光學史融入教學對高中學生科學本質觀及光概念的改變之研究。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
巫俊明(民85):五專普通物理課程中加入科學史事例對學生科學本質的了解、科學態度、及物理學科成績之影響研究。國科會專題研究NSC-85-2511-S-264-001。洪振方(民86):科學史融入科學教學之探討。高雄師大學報,第8期,p233-246。
洪振方(民87):科學教學的另類選擇:融入科學史的教學。屏師科學教育,第7期,p2-10。
施怡君(民89):「原子結構與週期表」超文系統之開發與學習成效研究。國立台灣師範大學化學研究所碩士論文。
柯俊良(民87):科學史融入教學的教師專業實踐模式研究。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
郭重吉、許玫理(民81):從科學哲學的演變探討科學教育的過去與未來。彰化師範大學學報,第三期,p531-561。
徐光台(民86):Kumn結構中所談的科學教育-兼論Siegel與Brush的爭議。科學學史哲與科學教育學術研討會暨研習會,p186-204。
高淑芬(民86):類比對國二學生科學概念學習之影響。國立臺灣師範大學科學教育 研究所碩士論文。
張榮耀(民89):以科學史與本體論的觀點探討概念改變之機制。國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
張宵亭(民82):教學方法與視聽媒體運用。台灣教育。第512期。p1-4。
涂浩祥(民78):教學技術與教學媒體。視聽教育雙月刊。第31卷,第2期,p5-7。
陳文靜(民89):原子與電子發展史融入教學對高一學生科學本質觀改變之研究。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
陳淑媛(民86):融入科學史於高中基礎理化教學之行動研究。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
陳杭生(民82):視聽媒體與教學正常化。視聽教育雙月刊。第34卷,第3期,p1-10。
國立編譯館(民90):國民中學理化教科書第二冊。台北。台灣書店。
許良榮&李田英(民84):科學史在科學教學的角色與功能。科學教育月刊,第179期,p15-27。
許良榮(民86):科學課文結構對於科學學習的影響。國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所博士論文。
許良榮(民87):科學史課文對於科學理論之閱讀學習的效果。中師數理學報,第2卷第1期,p111-141。
許良榮(民88):運用科學史資源設計課文-以「地球的形狀與運動」為例。1999科教育學刊。第5卷第3期,p391-418。
黃湘武(民82):皮亞傑理論在科學教育上的應用研究。第五屆科學教育學術研討會。
傅麗玉(民85):科學史與台灣中等教育之整合-問題與建議。化學教育面面觀,p165-193。台灣師大中等教育輔導委員會。
楊美雪(民85):教學媒體選擇因素及其模式之探討。中等教育。第47卷,第3期,p16-24。
鄭秀如&林煥祥(民87):科學史對高中學生學習成就之影響。科學教育學報,第2期,p205-222。
趙金祁(民82):科學理念衝擊下科學教育再出發芻議。科學教育月刊,第158期,p2-16。
劉昭宏(民82):教科書的選擇與設計。國立編譯館通訊。第七卷,第一期,p28-37。
簡聿成(民89):融入科學史之電腦輔助學習教材對高中學生科學探究思考學習之個案研究。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
英文部分
Abraham, M. R.., Grzybowski, E. B., & Renner, J. W. (1992). Understandings and misunderstanding of eighth graders of jive chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 29(2), p105-120.
Andersson, B.(1990). Pupil’s conceptions of matter and its transformation(age 12-16). Studies in Science Education, 18 , p53-85.
Andersson, B., & Renstrom, L.(1983). How Swedish pupils , age 12-15, explain the copper piple problem . University of Goteborg , Sweden.
Aussubel, D. P. (1968). Educational Psychology-a Cognitive View; Holt, Rinehart and Winston : New York.
Briggs, L. J. & Wager, W. W. (1981). Handbook of procedures for the design of instruction.Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Education Technology Publications.
Brush , S. (1989). History of science and science education. In M. Shortland & A. Warwick (eds.) , Teaching the history of science (p54-66). Basil Blackwell : The British Society for the History of Science.
Carey, S . (1985) . Conceptual change in childhood . Cambridge , MA : Mit Press .
Clement , J .(1983). A conceptual model discussed by Galileo and used intuitively by physics students. In D. Gentner & A .Stevens (eds), Mental Model . (p325-340). Hillsdale , NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Conant, J. B. (1951). Science and Common sense, Yale University Press.
Dale, E. A. (1969). Audiovisual method in teaching New York, NY : Holt Rinehart and Winston.
Driver, R.,Guesne, E.,Tiberghien, A.(1985). Children’s ideas in science. Milton Keynes :
Open University Press.
Driver, R .& Easley , J .(1978) . Puiples and Paradigm : A review of Literature Related to Concept Education , 5 , p61-84 .
Farr, C. W. & Shaeffer, J. M. (1993). Matching media, methods, and objectives in Distance Education. Educational Technology, 33(7), p52-55.
Gagn'e R. M. & Reiser, R. (1982). Characteristics of media selection models. Review of Educational Research, 52(4), p499-512.
Gagn'e R. M., Briggs, L. J. & Wager, W. W. (1992). Priciples of instructional design. Orlando, FL : Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Garrison , J . W . , & Lawwill , R . S . (1993). Democratic science teaching A role for the history of science . Interchange , 24(1ž) , p29-39.
Georgios, T. (1997). Atomic and molecular structure in chemical education : A critical analysis from various perspectives of science education. Journal of Chemical Education. 74(8), p922-925.
Gerald, H.(1981). Foreword to the symposium〝History of Atom〞.American Journal physics. 49(3), 205-231.
Griffiths, A. K., & Preston, K. R. (1989). An investigation of Grade-12 students' misconceptions relation to fundamental characteristics of molecules and atoms.
Griffiths, A. K., & Preston, K. R. (1992). Grade-12 students' misconceptions relation to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), p611-628.
Haidar, A. H., & Abraham, M. R. (1991). A comparison of Applied and Theoretical Knowledge of concepts based ond the particular nature matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), p919-938.
Happs, J.(1980). Partaicles : Learning in science project (WoSrking paper No. 18). Hamilton, N. Z : University of Waikato. (ERIC Documenta Reproduction Service No. ED235026).
Harrison, G.& Treagust, F.(1996). Secondary students’ mental models of atoms and molecules : Implications for teaching chemistry. Sicence Education, 80 (5): p509-534.
Heinich, R., Molenda, M., & Russell, J. D. (1993). Instructional media and the new technologies of unstruction. New York, NY : Macmillam.
Holton, G. & Brush, S.(1952). Introduction to concepts and theories in physical science , Massachusetts: Addison-Weskey.
Jensen, M. S. & Finley, F. N. (1996). Changes in students' understanding of evolution resulting from difference curricular and instructional strategies. Journal of research in science in science teaching. 33(8), p879-900.
Kipnis , N. (1996). The "Historical-Investigative "Approach to Teaching Science . Science and Education , 5 ,p277-292.
Klopfer, L. E. & Watson, F. G.( 1957). Historycal materials and high school science teaching, The Scirnce Teacher, October, p264-265; p292-293 .
Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), p179-211.
Kuhn , T. S .(1962) . The structure of scienctific revolutions. Chicago : University of Chicago Press .
Lee, O., Eichinger, D. C., Anderson, C. W., Berkheimer, G.D,. &Blakeslee, T. D.(1993). Changing middle school students’ conceptions of matter and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 30, p249-270.
Lochhead , J. & Dufresne , R. (1989). Helping Students Understand Difficult Science Concepts Through the Use of Dialogues with History. project funded in part by NSF# TEI-8751491 , ERIC ED312158.
Mansoor, N.(1998). From Cathode Rays to Alpha Particles to Quantum of Action: A Rational Reconstruction of Structure of the Atom and Its Implications for Chemistry Textbooks.
Matthews, M. R .(1994).Science Teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science , New York: Routledge .
Mayer , E .(1982). The Growth of Biological Thought , Havard University Press , Cambridge ,MA.
McCloskey , M .(1983). Naive theories of motion . In D. Gentner & A .Stevens (eds). Menta : Model (p299-324). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
McDonald , D. (1989). Teaching science for understanding : Implications of spontaneous concept and the history of science . ERIC: ED314251.
Nersessian, N. (1991). Conceptual change in science and in science education. In M. R. Marhews (ed.). History , Philosophy, and Science teaching : Selected Reading , p133-
140. Toronto & New York : OISE Press, Teachers College Press.
Novick, S. & Nussbaum, J. (1978). Junior high school pupli’s understanding of the particulate nature of matter : an interview study. Science Education. 62 (3) : p273-281.
Nussbaum, J., & Novick, S.(1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptional Conflict and accommodation : Toward a principled teaching strategy. Instrctructional Science, 11, p183-200.
Nussbaum, J.(1983). Classroom conceptual changes : The lesson to be learned from the history of science . In H. Hlem & J. D. Novak (eds).Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics (p272-281). Cornell University Department of Education.
Nussbaum, J.(1985). The particulate nature of matter in the gaseous phase. In R. Driver, E. Guesne& A. Tiberghien (EDS.), Children's ideas in science. (p124-144). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Nussbaum, J.(1991). The particulate nature of matter in the gaseous phase. In R. Driver, E. Guesne& A. Tiberghien (EDS.), Children's ideas in science. (p124-144). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Oldroyd , D. R .(1977). Teaching the history of chemistry in New South Wales secondary schools . The Australian Science Teachers Journal , 23(2) , p9-22 .
Osborne, R. J., Freyberg, P. (1985). Learing in science : The implications of children's science . Auckland : Heineman.
Pfundt, H.(1981). The atom - the final link in the division process or the first building block ? Climica didactica ; Nr7, p75-94.
Piaget, J. (1970b). Piaget's theory. In P. H. Mussen (ED.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology (Vol. 1). New York : Wiley.
Roach , L .E. & Wandersee , J .H .(1993). Short Story Science : Using Historical Vignetts as a Teaching Tool . The Science Teacher, 9 , p18-21.
Roach , L .E. & Wandersee , J .H .(1995). Putting People Back into Science : Using Historical Vignettes .School Science and Mathematics, 95(7) , p365-370.
Romiszowski, A. J.(1990). Designing instruction systems : Decision making in course planing and curriculum design. New York, NY : Nichols Publishing.
Schecker , H. P. (1992). The paradigmatic change in mechanics : Implication of historical processes for physics education . Science &Education , 1(1) , p71-76 .
Schollum, B., & Osborn, R. (1990). Relating the new to the familiar . In R. Osborn & P. Freyberg (EDS.) Learing in science : The implications of children' s science. (p51-65). Auckland, N. Z. : Heinemann Education.
Scott, P. H.(1992). Conceptual pathways in learning science : A case study of one student's ideas relating to the structure of matter . In R . Duit, F . Goldberg, & H. Niedder (EDS.) , Research in physics learning : Theoretical issues and empirical studies. Proceedings of an international workshop held at the University of Bremen, March, 1991 (p203-224). Kiel : IPN.
Seqeira , M. &Leite , L .(1991): Alternative conceptions and history of science in physics teacher education . Sceince & Education, 75(1), p45-56.
Sere, M. G.(1991). The gaseous stste. In r. Osborne & P. Freyberg (EDS.), Learning in science : The implications of children's science . (p105-123).Auckland, N. Z. : Heinemann Education.
Singer, H., & Donalan, D. (1980). Reading and learing from text. Boston : Little , Brown and Company.
Solomon , J. (1989). Teaching the History of Science : Is Nothing Scared ? Teaching the History of Science . p42-54.
Solomon , J., Duveen , I., Scot , L.,& McCarthy , S.(1992). Teaching about the nature of science through history : Action research in the classroom. Journal of research in Science teaching , 28(9) , p761-784.
Sotirios A., Sakkopoulos & Evagelos G,. Vitoratos.(1996). Empirical Foundation of atomism in Ancient Greek Philosophy. Science and Education. 5, 293-303.
Stavy, R.(1990). Children's conception of changes in the state of matter : From liquid (or solid) to gas. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 27(3), p247-266.
Stepans, J.(1991). Developmental patterns in students' understanding of physics concepts. In S .M . Glynn, R . H . Yeany & B . K . Britton (EDS.) , The psychology of learning
science . (p89-115) . Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Stonebarger, B.(1990). The atom: Time, Space, and Spirit--- keys to Scientific Literacy Series. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED324259.
TenBrink, T. D.(1990). Instructional objectives. In Cooper, J. M. (ED.). Classroom Teaching skills. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Company.
Tennyson, R. D. (1994). The big wrench vs. integrated approaches : The great media debate. Education Technology Research and Development, 42(3), p15-28.
Tosti, D. T. & Ball, J. R. (1969). A behavioral approach to instructional design and media selection. AV Communication Review, 17(1), p5-25.
Tsaparlis, G.(1997). Atomic and Molecular Structure in Chemical Education: A Critical Analysis from Various Perspectives of scienceEducation. Journal of Chemical education, 74(8), 922-925.
Wandersee , J . H .(1986) . Can the History of Science Help Science Edcatiors Anticipate Student' Misconceptions ? Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 23(7) , p581-597.