研究生: |
杜時堯 Du Shih-Yao |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
喬治巴代耶的社會關懷--邁向溝通之路 Georges Bataille's Social Concern--The Path to Communication |
指導教授: | 賴守正 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
英語學系 Department of English |
論文出版年: | 1999 |
畢業學年度: | 87 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 96 |
中文關鍵詞: | 喬治巴代耶 、溝通 、涂爾幹 、神聖性 、去差異性 、無社區狀態 |
英文關鍵詞: | Georges Bataille, Communication, Durkheim, Sacred, Dedifferentiation, The Absence of Community |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:169 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
摘 要
本論文旨在闡釋巴代耶如何發展其溝通的概念以作為他的社會關懷。對於巴代耶而言,人類的歷史為其喪失與他人產生立即經驗,也就是無法進行親密溝通之一段永不停息的追尋。而人類無法溝通的困窘乃是來自其對生存完整性的偏見所致。然而,這種由於無法溝通而喪失親密性的情形也是社會同質化的結果。此同質化的過程主要導因為現代資本主義的發展。其同質化過程意圖將人類的主體性減化為一具有疏離感且遭物化的物品,甚至進而排除任何無法同化的社會形式。
從人類學家涂爾幹和莫斯對於原始宗教活動的描述中,巴代耶看見了一絲希望且體認到一解決現代人類無法溝通的方法。透過犧牲儀式和禮物給予的群眾活動之下,所產生的激情互動,將會使人心中激發出一種極度的狂喜和狂悲。而此種人類高度激情的釋放對巴代耶而言乃屬於一種具有神聖性的情感。透過此神聖性的力量,人們因而產生了一種去差異性的過程,進而到達一平等的境界而相互溝通。而此種曾經在原始社會中扮演一聚眾及轉化功能的神聖性力量亦可被延續到現今社會中。然而,巴代耶以為,惟有在以無社區狀態為基礎的人類組織中,人們才能真正地達到溝通的境地。
Abstract
This thesis attempts to explicate how Bataille develops his idea of communication as his social concern. For Bataille, the history of human beings is an unquenchable search for the lost experience of immediacy with the other, that is, intimate communication. This predicament of human incommunicability is a result of the prejudice of human beings against the totality of their existence. Loss of intimacy through incommunicability is also a consequence of a process of social homogenization. This homogenizing process mainly derives from the development of modern capitalism, which intends to reduce human subjectivity into an alienated and reified object and to exclude any inassimilable social forms from this given order of things.
In the descriptions of primitive religious activities by anthropologists Emile Durkheim and Marcel Mauss, Bataille glimpses a ray of hope and discerns a way out of modern human incommunicability. Through intense interaction in such collective encounters as a sacrificial rite or a gift-giving potlatch, the release of human passion gives rise to the extremes of ecstasy and anguish which, for Bataille, belong to the category of the sacred sensibility. Serving as contemptuous gestures towards the enslavement of work and the law of homogenization, the sacred spirits challenge social constraints such as rank and wealth and propel everyone to experience a process of material and spiritual dedifferentiation, fusing all particular sentiments into one common sentiment without any interference of artificial regulations. Through this “communion,” human beings can approach the realm of genuine communication. This transformative force of the sacred, once cementing the separate individuals in primitive societies together, can be extended to the contemporary society. However, Bataille concludes that an intimate communication can only be achieved within a sphere whose foundation is the absence of community.
Works Cited
Abel, Lionel, “Georges Bataille and the Repetition of
Nietsche.” On Bataille: Critical Essay. ed. Leslie Anne
Boldt-Irons. Albany: SUNY, 1995.51-60.
Alexander, Jeffrey C. ed. Durkheimian Sociology: cultural
studies.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
_____. Introduction. Durkheimian Sociology: cultural
studies. ed. Jefferey C. Alexander. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1988.1-21.
Bataille, Georges. The Absence of Myth. trans. Michael
Richardson. London: Verso, 1994.
_____. 1991a. The Accursed Share I. trans. Robert Hurley.
New York:Zone Books.
_____. 1991b. The Accursed Share II & III trans. Robert
Hurley. New York: Zone Books.
_____. 1979a. “Attraction and Repulsion I: Tropism,
Sexuality, Laughter and Tears.” The College of Sociology
1937-39. ed. Denis Hollier.trans. Betsy Wing.
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 103-112.
_____. The Bataille Reader. ed. Fred Botting and Scott
Wilson. Oxford:Blackwell, 1997.
_____. Eroticism. trans. Mary Dalwood. London: Marion
Boyars, 1986.
_____. 1988a. Guilty. trans. Bruce Boone. intro. Denis
Hollier. California: The Lapis Press.
_____. 1991c. The Impossible. trans. Robert Hurley. San
Francisco:City Lights Books.
_____. 1988b. Inner Experience. translated and introduced by
Leslie Anne Boldt. Albany: SUNY.
_____. Literature and Evil. trans. Alastair Hamilton.
London: Marion Boyars, 1983.
_____ et al. 1979b. “Note on the Foundation of a College of
Sociology.”The College of Sociology 1937-39. ed. Denis
Hollier. trans. Betsy Wing. Minneapolis: University of
Minnesota Press. 3-5.
_____. On Nietzsche. trans. Bruce Boone. intro. Sylvere
Lotringer. New York: Paragon House, 1992.
_____. 1988c. The Tears of Eros. trans. Peter Connor. San
Francisco: City Lights Books.
_____. Theory of Religion. trans. Robert Hurley. New York:
Zone Books, 1989.
_____. Visions of Excess: Selected Writings, 1927-1939.
edited and introduced by Allan Stoekl. trans. Allan
Stoekl, Carl R. Lovitt and Donald M. Leslie, Jr.
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985.
_____ et al. ENCYCLOPADIA ACEPHALICA. ed. Georges
Bataille, Robert Lebel and Isabelle Waldberg. intro.
Alastair Brotchie. trans. Iain White et al. London: Atlas
Press, 1995.
Baudrillard, Jean. “Death in Bataille.” Bataille: A
Critical Reader. eds. Fred Botting and Scott Wilson.
Oxford: Blackwell, 1998. 139-45.
Blanchot, Maurice. The Infinite Conversation. trans. Susan
Hanson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.
Boldt-Irons, Leslie Anne, ed. On Bataille: critical essays.
Albany: SUNY,1995.
Botting, Fred and Scott Wilson, eds. Bataille: A Critical
Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 1998.
_____. Introduction. Bataille: A Critical Reader. Oxford:
Blackwell, 1998.
Bourdieu, Pierre. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge:
Cambridge Unversity Press, 1977.
Breton, Andre. Manifestoes of Surrealism. trans. Richard
Seaver and Helen R. Lane. Ann Arbor: University of
Michigan Press, 1969.
Brown, Norman O.. Life Against Death. Connecticut: Wesleyan
University Press, 1959.
Chenieux-Gendron, Jacqueline. Surrealism. trans. Vivian
Folkenflik. New York: Columbia UP, 1990.
Durkheim, Emile. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life.
trans. Joseph Ward Swain. London: George Allen & Unwin,
1982.
_____ et al. Essays on Sociology and Philosophy. ed. Kurt H.
Wolff. New York, 1964.
Fenton, Steve. Durkheim and Modern Sociology. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1984.
ffrench, Patrick and Roland-Francois Lack, ed. The Tel Quel
Reader. London: Routledge, 1998.
_____. Introduction. The Tel Quel Reader. London: Routledge,
1998.
Foucault, Michel. “A Preface to Transgression.” Bataille: A
Critical Reader. eds. Fred Botting and Scott Wilson.
Oxford: Blackwell. 1998. 24-40.
Gallop, Jane, “Reading Friends’ Corpses.” MLN 95(1980):
1017-1022.
Gasche, Rodolphe. “The Heterological Almanac.” On
Bataille: Critical Essay. ed. Leslie Anne Boldt-Irons.
Albany: SUNY, 1995. 157-208.
Giddens, Anthony. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge:
Polity Press, 1990.
_____. Capitalism and Modern Social Theory: an analysis of the
writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1971.
_____. Sociology: A Brief but Critical Introduction. London:
Macaillam, 1982.
Gill, Carolyn Bailey, ed. Bataille: Writing the Sacred.
London: Routledge, 1995.
Greaves, Thomas C. “Emile Durkheim.” A Dictionary of
Cultural And Critical Theory. ed. Michael Payne. Oxford:
Blackwell, 1997.
Guerlac, Suzanne. “Bataille in Theory—Afterimages
(Lascaux)." Diacritics: a review of contemporary
criticism. 26.2(summer 1996): 6-17.
Hollier, Denis, ed. The College of Sociology, 1937-1939.
trans. Betsy Wing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota
Press, 1987.
Hunt, Lynn. “The Sacred and the French Revolution.”
Durkheimian Sociology: cultural studies. ed. Jefferey C.
Alexander. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
25-43.
Land, Nick. The Thirst for Annihilation: Georges Bataille and
Virulent Nihilism. London: Routledge, 1992.
Marx, K. Capital, vol. I. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1967.
_____ and Engels, F. Collected Works. London: Lawrence and
Wishart, 1975.
Payne, Michael ed. A Dictionary of Cultural and Critical
Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997.
Richardson, Michael. Georges Bataille. London: Routledge,
1994.
_____ ed. Georges Bataille. London: Sage, 1998.
Richman, Michele. “The Sacred Group: A Durkheimian
Perspective on the College de sociologie.” Bataille:
Writing the Sacred. ed. Gill, Carolyn Bailey. London:
Routledge, 1995. 58-76.
_____. Reading Georges Bataille: Beyond the Gift. Baltimore:
The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982.
Sasso, Robert, “Georges Bataille and the Challenge to
Think.” On Bataille: Critical Essay. ed. Leslie Anne
Boldt-Irons. Albany: SUNY, 1995. 41-50.
Sollers, Philippes. “The Bataille’s Act.” The Tel Quel
Reader. eds. Patrick ffrench and Roland-Francois Lack.
London and New York: Routledge, 1998. 123-132.
Stoekl, Allan. “Bataille, Gift Giving, and the Cold War.”
The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity. ed.
Alan D. Schrift. NY: Routledge, 1997. 245-255.
_____ ed. On Bataille. Yale French Studies. New Haven: Yale
UP, 1990. Tiryahian, Edward A.. “From Durkheim to
Managua: Revolutions as Religious Revivals.” Durkheimian
Sociology: cultural studies. ed. Jefferey C. Alexander.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. 25-43.