簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 劉文嘉
Liu, Wun-Jia
論文名稱: 青少年社群網站使用動機與心理幸福感之關係:自我揭露的中介暨友誼品質的調節效果
The relationship between motivation of social network sites usage and psychological well-being for adolescents: self-disclosure as a mediator and friendship quality as a moderator.
指導教授: 陳慧娟
Chen, Huey-Jiuan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 135
中文關鍵詞: 友誼品質自我揭露社群網站使用動機青少年幸福感
英文關鍵詞: Adolescents, Friendship quality, Motivation of social network sites usage, Self-disclosure, Well-being
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU201900187
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:298下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討國內青少年社群網站使用動機、心理幸福感、自我揭露與友誼 品質的相關情況。採立意抽樣方式,邀請臺灣 107 學年度的公私立國中與高中/ 職生填答自陳式問卷,其中男生 598 人與女生 681 人,共計 1, 279 人。研究工具 包括「社群網站使用動機量表」、「心理幸福感量表」、「自我揭露量表」、「現 實友誼品質量表」及「網路友誼品質量表」,資料以描述性統計、t 考驗、皮爾森 積差相關及迴歸進行統計考驗。主要研究結果顯示:
    一、女生在四種社群網站使用動機、自我揭露、現實友誼品質和網路友誼品質得分 皆高於男性;但兩性在心理幸福感得分程度沒有不同。
    二、高中/職生在四種社群網站使用動機、自我揭露、現實友誼品質和網路友誼品 質得分皆高於國中生;但兩者在心理幸福感得分程度沒有差異。
    三、社群網站使用動機、自我揭露皆分別與心理幸福感均呈現正相關。
    四、自我揭露對青少年的社交性、工具性及娛樂性使用動機與心理幸福感之關係不 具有中介效果;自我揭露對青少年的表達性使用動機與心理幸福感之關係具有完全中介效果。
    五、現實友誼品質對青少年的四種使用動機與心理幸福感的關係不具有調節效果; 網路友誼品質對青少年的四種使用動機與心理幸福感的關係具有調節效果。
    本研究針對研究結果提出結論與建議,提供教育輔導實務及未來相關研究之參考。

    The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between the motivation of social network sites usage, psychological well-being, self-disclosure and friendship quality. Participants were 1, 279 adolescents in Taiwan, including 598 boys and 681 girls. Data were collected by the motivation of social network sites usage scale, psychological well-being scale, self-disclosure scale, real life friendship quality scale and internet friendship quality scale, then analyzed through the descriptive statistics, t-test, Pearson product-moment correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis. The findings were as follows:
    1. Girls showed significantly higher motivation of social network sites usage, self-
    disclosure, real-life friendship quality and online friendship quality scores than boys;
    there is no difference in the psychological well-being score between girls and boys.
    2. High school students showed significantly higher motivation of social network sites usage, self-disclosure, real-life friendship quality and online friendship quality scores than junior high school students; there is no difference in the psychological well-being score between high school students and junior high school students.
    3. There were significantly positive relations between motivation of social network sites usage and psychological well-being; there were significantly positive relations between self-disclosure and psychological well-being.
    4. The relationship between social motivation, instrumental motivation, entertainment motivation and psychological well-being among adolescents was not mediated by self- disclosure; the relationship between expressive motivation and psychological well-being among adolescents was mediated by self-disclosure.
    5. The relationship between four motivation of social network sites usages and psychological well-being among adolescents was not moderated by real life friendship quality; the relationship between four motivation of social network sites usages and psychological well-being was moderated online friendship quality.

    According to the findings of this study, suggestions are provided to schools and further researches.

    致謝詞 i 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 v 目次 ix 表次 xi 圖次 xv 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 研究問題 4 第四節 名詞釋義 5 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節 社群網站使用動機與相關研究 7 第二節 幸福感理論與相關研究 9 第三節 自我揭露與相關研究 14 第四節 友誼品質與相關研究 19 第五節 社群網站使用動機、自我揭露、心理幸福感與友誼品質之關聯性探討 23 第六節 研究假設 25 第三章 研究方法 27 第一節 研究架構 27 第二節 研究對象 28 第三節 研究工具 31 第四節 研究實施程序 53 第五節 資料處理與分析 54 第四章 研究結果與討論 57 第一節 研究假設考驗 57 第二節 綜合討論 90 第五章 結論與建議 97 第一節 結論 97 第二節 研究建議 98 參考文獻 103 中文部分 105 英文部分 106 附錄 119 附錄一 預示量表 119 附錄二 正式量表 126 附錄三 量表授權同意內容 133

    台灣網路資訊中心(2018)。「2018年台灣網路報告」。取自https://blog.twnic.net.tw/2019/01/10/1902/
    江文慈(2013)。i時代的身心健康隱憂:低頭族症候群。諮商與輔導,330,17-20。
    江文慈(2013)。穿梭在現實與虛擬之間:網路人格的探索。諮商與輔導,329,5-10。
    江文慈(2018)。情緒表達的性別差異:跨情境的分析。教育心理學報,49(3),345-366。
    行政院主計總處(2016)。國民幸福指數年報2016。取自https://ebook.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=40331&ctNode=5971&mp=103
    余民寧、謝進昌、林士郁、陳柏霖、曾筱婕(2011)。教師主觀幸福感模式建構與驗證之研究。測驗學刊,58(1),55-85。
    李仁豪、余民寧(2016)。心理幸福感量表簡式中文版信效度及測量不變性:以大學生為樣本並兼論測量不變性議題。中華輔導與諮商學報,46,127-154。
    李董平、餘苗梓、王才康、謝晰君、周柳梅、朱訓明(2006)。青少年自我表露和自我隱瞞的特點及其與主觀幸福感的關係。心理發展與教育,22(4),83-90。
    李磊、劉鵬程、孫嫿(2017)。男性與女性,誰更幸福?。統計研究,7,82-93。
    汪志堅、陳翔、江義平、江維彬(2013)。Facebook社交網站使用因素之量表發展與驗證。電子商務學報,15(3),319-352。
    谷玲玲(2013):網路親密關係中的自我揭露。資訊社會研究,24,1-26。
    兒福聯盟(2018)。2018年兒童幸福感調查。取自https://www.children.org.tw/research/detail/67/1353
    林雅容(2009)。自我認同形塑之初探: 青少年、角色扮演與線上遊戲。資訊社會研究,16,197-229。
    林慧姿、程景琳(2006)。國小六年級學童自尊、情緒調節與友誼之相關研究。教育心理學報,38(2) ,177-193。
    林麗玲、林惠雅(2006)。家人關係與青少年幸福感之相關研究。兒童與家人關係研討會,台北,台灣。
    邱文彬、林美珍(1999)。大學生發展成熟的人際關係中親密性能力的發展:自我揭露與自主性之年級與性別差異的探討。教育心理學報,31(1),37-62。
    邱皓政(2011)。量化研究與統計分析(五版)。台北:五南。
    金車文教基金會(2018)。最新調查:4成青少年每天滑手機超過3小時。取自: https://heho.com.tw/archives/13748
    胡玉珍(2008)。大學生網路交友、自我揭露與愛情態度之研究。國立臺灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系碩士論文。
    翁敏甄、陳嘉成(2018)。男女幸福大不同?─父母教養、教師管教與同儕關係品質對不同性別國中生幸福感預測之差異分析。臺中教育大學學報:數理科技類,32(2),57-77。
    陶振超(2015)。網際網路與友誼網絡:取代、擴大、或強化。傳播與社會學刊,34,57-88。
    陸洛(1998)。中國人幸福感之內涵、測量及相關因素探討。行政院國家科學委員會研究彙編:人文及社會科學,8(1),115-137。
    程景琳(2010)。社交計量及同儕知覺受歡迎度與青少年關係攻擊及孤寂感之相關研究。教育心理學報,42(1),143-162。
    程景琳(2014)。不動拳頭之校園霸凌─論關係攻擊之性別因素與發展階段特性。輔導季刊,50(1),2-11。
    楊天盾、熊瑞梅(2018)。性別化的青少年友誼網絡與性別角色態度:單一性別與混合性別的班級脈絡。調查研究—方法與應用,40,7-61。
    臺灣傳播資料庫(2018)。「你,為何上癮?」—探討青少年的電玩動機。取自http://www.crctaiwan.nctu.edu.tw/epaper/%E7%AC%AC75%E6%9C%9F20181023.htm
    臺灣傳播資料庫(2018)。性別與社群媒體使用動機、行為的關係。取自http://www.crctaiwan.nctu.edu.tw/epaper/%E7%AC%AC73%E6%9C%9F20181005.htm
    臺灣傳播資料庫(2019)。不同性別的青少年使用社群媒體之類型與動機。取自http://www.crctaiwan.nctu.edu.tw/epaper/%E7%AC%AC86%E6%9C%9F20190530.htm
    趙梅如、王世億(2013)。大學生同性友誼品質之內涵驗證及性別差異分析。教育心理學報,44(4),829-852。
    劉信妤、黃莉婷(2012)。社群網站中使用者自我揭露行為之研究。中華民國資訊管理學會主辦「第二十三屆國際資訊管理學術研討會(ICIM 2012)」宣讀之論文(高雄)。
    鄭博真、李新民(2017)。技職大專生心理幸福感量表之發展與驗證。國立臺南大學教育學報,51(1),1-24。
    盧怡蒨(2013)。高中生的友誼品質、同儕接納與心理福祉。國立臺北教育大學教育學院心理與諮商學系碩士論文。
    蕭銘雄、李孟娟(2016)。國中生對社群網站Facebook使用動機與隱私設置之關聯性研究。電子商務研究,14(4),449-525。
    謝雨生、吳齊殷、李文傑(2006)。青少年網絡特性、互動結構和友誼動態。台灣社會學,11,175-236。
    簡嘉盈、程景琳(2012)。同儕對高中生之利社會行為的影響:檢視同理心與友誼特性之調節角色。教育科學期刊,11(1),105-123。
    張欣茂、林淑玲、李明芝譯(2015)。發展心理學。臺北市:新加坡商聖智學習。Shaffer, D. R., & Kipp, K. (2014). Developmental Psychology: Childhood And Adolescence, 9E, Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.

    Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt: Rinehart and Winston.
    Andreassen, C.S., Torsheim, T., Brunborg, G.S., & Pallesen, S. (2012). Development of a Facebook addiction scale. Psychological Reports, 110 (2), 501-517.
    Baron, R. & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
    Bazarova, N. N., & Choi, Y. H. (2014). Self-disclosure in social media: Extending the functional approach to disclosure motivations and characteristics on social network sites. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 635-657.
    Berndt, T. J. (1996). Exploring the effects of friendship quality on social development. In W. M. Bukowski, A. F. Newcomb, & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), Cambridge studies in social and emotional development. The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence (pp. 346-365). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Berndt, T. J. (2002). Friendship Quality and Social Development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 7-10.
    Brell, J., Valdez, A. C., Schaar, A. K., & Ziefle, M. (2016). Gender Differences in Usage Motivation for Social Networks at Work. Learning and Collaboration Technologies, 9753, 663-674.
    Bukowski, W. M., Hoza, B., & Boivin, M. (1994). Measuring friendship quality during pre- and early adolescence: The development and psychometric properties of the friendship qualities scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11(3), 471e484.
    Burke, M., &Kraut, R. E. (2016). The Relationship Between Facebook Use and Well-Being Depends on Communication Type and Tie Strength. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21, 265-28.
    Chan, M. (2015a). Mobile phones and the good life: Examining the relationships among mobile use, social capital and subjective well-being. New Media & Society, 17, 96-113.
    Chan, M. (2018). Mobile-mediated multimodal communications, relationship quality and subjective well-being: An analysis of smartphone use from a life course perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 254-262.
    Chen, L., Hu, N., Shu, C, & Chen, X. (2019). Adult attachment and self-disclosure on social networking site: A content analysis of Sina Weibo. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 96-105.
    Cheung, C. M. K. & Lee, M. K. O. (2009). Understanding the sustainability of a virtual community: Model development and empirical test. Journal of Information Science, 35(3), 279-298.
    Chu, J.Y. (2005). Adolescent boy’s friendship and peer group culture. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 107, 7-22.
    Colás-Bravo, P., González-Ramírez, T., Pablos-Pons, J. (2013). Young People and Social Networks: Motivations and Preferred Uses. Comunicar, 20(40), 15-23.
    Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 457-475. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.457
    Common Sense. (2018). Social Media, Social Life. Retrieved from https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/uploads/research/2018_cs_socialmediasociallife_fullreport-final-release_2_lowres.pdf
    Crabtree, M. A., Pillow, D. R. (2018). Extending the Dual Factor Model of Facebook Use: Social motives and network density predict Facebook use through impression management and open self-disclosure. Personality and Individual Differences, 133, 34-40.
    Dai, Y., Shin, S. Y., Kashian, N., Jang, J.-w., & Walther, J. B. (2016). The influence of responses to self-disclosure on liking in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 35(4), 394-411.
    Das, M. (2014). Using Social Networking Sites (SNS): Mediating Role of Self Disclosure and Effect on Well being. Indore Management Journal, 6(2), 30-38.
    Dhir, A., (2016a). Exploring Online Self-presentation in Computer-mediated Environments: Motives and Reasons for Photo-tagging and Untagging (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Aalto , Finland.
    Dhir, A., Tsai, C.-C., (2017). Understanding the relationship between intensity and gratifications of Facebook use among adolescents and young adults. Telematics and Informatics, 34, 350-364.
    Doré, I., Sabiston, C. M., Sylvestre, M., Brunet, J., O’Loughlin, J., Nader, P. A., Gallant, F., Bélanger, M. (2019). Years Participating in Sports During Childhood Predicts Mental Health in Adolescence: A 5-Year Longitudinal Study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 64, 790-796.
    Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The Benefits of Facebook ‘‘Friends:’’ Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168.
    Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13, 873-892.
    Fernandes, H. M., Vasconcelos-Raposo, J., & Teixcira, C. M. (2010). Preliminary analysis of the psychometric properties of Ryff ’s scales of psychological well-being in Portuguese adolescents. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13(2), 1032-1043.
    Flynn, H.K., Felmlee, D.H., Conger, R. D. (2017). The Social Context of Adolescent Friendships: Parents, Peers, and Romantic Partners. Youth & Society, 49(5), 679-705.
    Gao, G. (2015). On social media, mom and dad are watching. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/04/10/on-social-media-mom-and-dad-are-watching/#more-268788
    Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D. (2006). Self-Presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in Internet dating. Communication Research, 33(2), 152-177.
    Gool, E. V., Ouytsel, J.V., Ponnet, K., Walrave, M. (2015). To share or not to share? Adolescents’ self-disclosure about peer relationships on Facebook: An application of the Prototype Willingness Model. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 230-239.
    Gülnar, B., Balcı, Ş., & Çakır, V. (2010). Motivations of Facebook, YouTube and similar Websites users. Journal of Social Sciences of the Turkish World, 54, 161-184.
    Hall, J. A., Kearney, M. W., & Xing, C. (2018). Two tests of social displacement through social media use. Information, Communication & Society, 22(10), 1396-1413.
    Hampton, K., Rainie, L., Lu, W. Dwyer, M., Shin, I., & Purcell, K. (2014). Social Media and the ‘Spiral of Silence’. Retrieved from : https://www.pewinternet.org/2014/08/26/social-media-and-the-spiral-of-silence/
    Hawk, S. T., Bogt, T. F. M., Eijnden, R. J. J .M., & Nelemans, S. A. (2015). Too little power, too much information! Power, narcissism, and adolescents’ disclosures on social networking sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 72-80.
    Helliwell, J., & Huang, H. (2013). Comparing the happiness effects or real and on-line friends. PLoS ONE 8:e72754.
    Hollenbaugh, E. E. (2010). Personal journal bloggers: Profiles of disclosiveness. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1657-1666.
    Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electroni Journal Business Research Methods,6(1), 1-11.
    Horwood, S., & Anglim, J. (2019). Problematic smartphone usage and subjective and psychological well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 44-50.
    Horzum, M. B. (2016). Examining the relationship to gender and personality on the purpose of Facebook usage of Turkish university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 319-328.
    Huang, C. (2017). Time Spent on Social Network Sites and Psychological Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 20(6), 346-354.doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0758
    Huang, H.Y. (2016). Examining the beneficial effects of individual's self-disclosure on the social network site. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 122-132.
    Kalpidou, M., Costin, D., & Morris, J. (2011). The Relationship Between Facebook and the Well-Being of Undergraduate College Students. Behavior, and social networking, 14(4), 183-189.
    Kang, J., & Wei, L. (in press). Let me be at my funniest: Instagram users’ motivations for using Finsta (a.k.a., fake Instagram). The Social Science Journal.
    Katja, R., Päivi, A. K., Marja-Terttu, T., Pekka, L. (2002). Relationships among adolescent subjective well-being, health behavior, and school satisfaction. The Journal of School Health, 72(6), 243-249.
    Keyes, C. L. M., & Waterman, M. B. (2003). Dimensions of well-being and mental health in adulthood. In M. H. Bornstein, L. Davidson, C. L. M. Keyes & Moore, A. Kristin (Eds.), Well-being: Positive development across the life course (pp. 477-497). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Kim, J., & Stavrositu, C. (2018). Feelings on Facebook and their correlates with psychological well-being: The moderating role of culture. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 79-87.
    Ko, H. C., Kuo, F.Y. (2009). Can blogging enhance subjective well- being through self-disclosure? CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 75-9.
    Krasnova, H., Veltri, N. F., Eling, N., & Buxmann, P. (2017). Why men and women continue to use social networking sites: The role of gender differences. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 26, 261-268.
    Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet Paradox Revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49-74. doi: doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00248
    L€onnqvist, J.-E., Itkonen, J.V. (2014). It’s all about extraversion: why Facebook friend count doesn’t count towards well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 64-67.
    Lee, E., Lee, J. A., Moon, J. H., & Sung, Y. (2015). Pictures speak louder than words: Motivations for using Instagram. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(9), 552-556.
    Lee, G., Lee, J., & Kwon, S. (2011). Use of social-networking sites and subjective well-being: a study in South Korea. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(3), 151-155.
    Lee, K.T., Noh, M.J., & Koo, D.M. (2013). Lonely people are no longer lonely on social networking sites: The mediating role of self-disclosure and social support. Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 413-418.
    Leiner, D. J., Kobilke, L., Rueb, C., & Brosius, H. (2018). Functional domains of social media platforms: Structuring the uses of Facebook to better understand its gratifications. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 194-203.
    Lenhart, A., Smith, A., & Anderson, M. (2015). Teens, Technology and Romantic Relationships. Pew Research Center, 2015, 1-77.
    Li, R. H. (2014). Reliability and validity of a shorter Chinese version for Ryff ’s psychological well-being scale. Health Education Journal, 73(4), 446-452.
    Lima, M. L., Marques, S., Muiños, G., Camilo, C.(2017). All You Need Is Facebook Friends? Associations between Online and Face-to-Face Friendships and Health.
    Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-12.
    Lin, X., Li, S., Qu, C. (2017a). Social network sites influence recovery from social exclusion: individual differences in social anxiety. Computer in Human Behaviors, 75, 538-546.
    Lyons, M. (2018). Social Media, Gender, and the Future: An Interview with Dr. Rosanna Guadagno. Retrieved from https://ischool.syr.edu/infospace/2018/11/09/social-media-gender-future-rosanna-guadagno/
    Mendelson, M. J., & Aboud, F. E. (2012). Measuring Friendship Quality in Late Adolescents and Young Adults: McGill Friendship Questionnaires. Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved from http://www.midss.org/sites/default/files/unpublished_paper.pdf
    Mesch, G. S. (2009). Social context and communication channels choice among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 244-251.
    Mukesh, M., Mayo, M., & Goncalves, D. (2014). Well-being paradox of social networking sites: maintaining relationships and gathering unhappiness. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2014(1), 14709-14709.
    Muscanell, N. L., & Guadagno, R. E. (2012). Make new friends or keep the old: Gender and personality differences in social networking use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 107-112.
    Narr, R.K., Allen, J.P., Tan, J.S., Loeb, E.L. (2019). Close Friendship Strength and Broader Peer Group Desirability as Differential Predictors of Adult Mental Health. Child Development, 90 (1), 298-313.
    Nie, N. H. (2001). Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the Internet: Reconciling conflicting findings. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 420-435.
    Oswald, D.L., Clark, E. M., & Kelly, C.M. (2004). Friendship maintenance: Analysis of individual and dyad behaviors. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(3), 413-441.
    Pang, H. (2018). Microblogging, friendship maintenance, and life satisfaction among university students: The mediatory role of online self-disclosure. Telematics and Informatics, 35, 2232-2241.
    Pang, H. (2018). WeChat use is significantly correlated with college students’ quality of friendships but not with perceived well-being. Heliyon, 4(11), 1-22.
    Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29(4), 611-621.
    Posey, C., Lowry, P. B., Roberts, T. L., & Ellis, T. S. (2010). Proposing the online community self-disclosure model: the case of working professionals in France and the UK who use online communities. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(2), 181-195.
    Rimé, B. (2016). Self-Disclosure. Encyclopedia of Mental Health, Cambridge: Academic Press.
    Rokito, S., Choi, Y. H., Taylor, S. H., & Bazarova, N. N. (2019). Over-gratified, under gratified, or just right? Applying the gratification discrepancy approach to investigate recurrent Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 76-83.
    Ronen, T., Hamama, L., Rosenbaum, M., & Mishely-Yarlap, A. (2016). Subjective well-being in adolescence: The role of self-control, social support, age, gender, and familial crisis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(1), 81-104.
    Royal Society for Public Health (2018). Social media and young people's mental health and wellbeing. Retrieved from https://www.rsph.org.uk/uploads/assets/uploaded/62be270a-a55f-4719-ad668c2ec7a74c2a.pdf
    Ryff, C. D. (1989a). Happiness is everything, or is it ? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081.
    Ryff, C. D. (1989b). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081.
    Sampasa-Kanyinga, H., & Lewis, R. F. (2015). Frequent use of social networking sites is associated with poor psychological functioning among children and adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(7), 380-385.
    Schweder, S.M., & Raufelder, D. (2019). Positive emotions, learning behavior and teacher support in self-directed learning during adolescence: Do age and gender matter? Journal of Adolescence, 73, 73-84.
    Selman, R. L. (1981). The child as a friendship philosopher: A case study in the growth of interpersonal understanding. In SR Asher JM (Eds.), The development of children’s friendships (pp. 242-272). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    Souza, Z. D., & Dick, G. N. (2009). Disclosure of information by children in social networking—Not just a case of “you show me yours and I’ll show you mine”. International Journal of Information Management, 29, 255-261.
    Stewart-Brown, S., Samaraweera, P. C., Taggart, F., Kandala, N. B., & Stranges, S. (2015). Socioeconomic gradients and mental health: implications for public health. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 206(6), 461-465.
    Takano, M. (2018). Two types of social grooming methods depending on the trade-off between the number and strength of social relationships. Royal Society Open Science , 5(8), 1-19.
    Taylor, D. (1973). Self-Disclosure as an Exchange Process: Reinforcement Effects. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Meeting, Montreal, Canada.
    Throuvala, M. A., Griffiths, M. D., Rennoldson, M., & Kuss, D. J. (2019). Motivational processes and dysfunctional mechanisms of social media use among adolescents: A qualitative focus group study. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 164-175.
    Trepte, S. & Reinecke, L. (2013). The reciprocal effects of social network site use and the disposition for self-disclosure: A longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (3), 1102-1112.
    Trepte, S., Masur, P.K., & Scharkow, M., (2018). Mutual friends’ social support and self-disclosure in face-to-face and instant messenger communication. Journal of Psychology, 158, 430-445.
    Truong, C., Gallo, J., Roter, D., & Joo, J. (2019). The role of self-disclosure by peer mentors: Using personal narratives in depression care. Patient Education and Counseling, 102, 1273-1279.
    Tufekci, Z. (2008). Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites’, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 28(1), 20-36.
    Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming conversation: The power of talk in a digital age. New York: Penguin Press.
    Utz, S. (2015). The function of self-disclosure on social network sites: Not only intimate, but also positive and entertaining self-disclosures increase the feeling of connection. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 1-10.
    Verswijvel, K., Heirman, W., Hardies, K., & Walrave, M. (2018). Designing and validating the friendship quality on social network sites questionnaire. Computers in Human Behavior , 86, 289-298,
    Virtanen, T.E., Vasalampi, K., Torppa, M., Lerkkanen, M.-K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2019). Changes in students' psychological well-being during transition from primary school to lower secondary school: A person-centered approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 69, 138-149.
    Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 1-43.
    Waterloo, S.F., Baumgartner, S.E., Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P.M. (2017). Norms of online expressions of emotion: comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp. New media & Society, 20 (5), 1813-1831.
    Zhan, L., Sun, Y., Wang, N., & Zhang, X. (2016). Understanding the influence of social media on people’s life satisfaction through two competing explanatory mechanisms. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 68 (3), 347-361. doi: 10.1108/AJIM-12-2015-0195
    Zinoviev, D., & Duong, V. (2009). Toward understanding friendship in online social networks. International Journal of Technology, Knowledge, and Society, 5(2), 1-8.

    無法下載圖示 本全文未授權公開
    QR CODE