本研究旨在瞭解國高中體育教師參與者的工作滿意度與組織承諾之研究，藉以提供學校單位、教育主管機關進行教育人力資源規劃與管理及進行教師評選時之參考依據與建議。本研究採用問卷調查法進行資料的收集與分析。研究對象為臺北市公私立國高中體育教師。共發出810份、回收670份有效問卷，有效問卷回收率達82.7%。研究工具係採「臺北市體育教師工作情形研究調查問卷」，此問卷包含工作滿意度和組織承諾兩部分。在工作滿意度部分，包括薪資福利、工作環境、行政領導三個構面。組織承諾部分包括留職意願、努力承諾與組織認同等三個構面。資料分析包括描述性統計、探索性因素分析、t檢定、單因子雙異數分析與雪費爾事後比較等方法。謹將重要結論摘述如后：一、不同行政職務、學校屬性、婚姻狀況、年齡、任教年資及職稱在工作滿意度有顯著差異。二、不同學校屬性、婚姻狀況、年齡及任教年資在組織承諾有顯著差異。綜上，本研究建議：研究對象可擴大到全國各縣市及增加體育組長之意見，研究工具可增加其它量表，讓整個研究能夠更完整。

The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between the job satisfaction and organization commitment for PE teachers’ of different educational background. The results would be provided as references and suggestions for schools and educational administration institution to plan educational human resource and evaluate teachers.

The study was conducted through questionnaires and the sample was based on the public and private PE teachers of junior and senior high schools in Taipei City. A total of 810 questionnaires were distributed and the valid returned questionnaires were 670.The valid response rate was 82.7%. The instrument of the study was “PE teachers’ job satisfaction and organization commitment questionnaires in Taipei City,” which comprised job satisfaction and organization commitment sections. In job satisfaction, there were three categories: salaries and welfare, working environment and administration leadership. In organization commitment, there were three categories: the willingness to stay on the job, promise to work hard and organization identification. All valid questionnaires were further analyzed with descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis, t-test, one-way ANOVA, and Scheffe’s test comparison afterwards.

The important result were described as followings. First, there was significant difference on job satisfaction concerning different administration job title, school types, marital status, ages, and the length of teaching experience. Second, there was significant difference on organization commitment concerning different school types, marital status, ages, and the length of teaching experience. In sum, the present study suggested that future studies could try to enlarge counties and cities all over the country. And the opinions of the PE team leaders or supervisors can be included. More measuring scales can be applied to make the whole study more complete.

一、中文部分
王誼邦（1997）。國民中學體育教師專業發展之研究〜以臺北市、縣為例。國立台灣師範大學體育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
古金英(2004)。工作自主性、員工股權擁有滿意、自主性需求與組織承諾間關係之再探討：以台灣電子業員工為例。科技管理期刊，9(2)，131-161。
吳宗立、林保豐 (2003)。國民小學教師工作壓力與組織承諾關係之研究。國教學報，15，193-230。
吳清基（1980）。國民中學組織結構與教師工作滿意之關係。國立台灣師範大學教育研究。
余景達（2002）。國民小學學校本位管理與教師工作滿意關係之研究。台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中。
周佳慧（2002）。國中體育教師工作滿意之研究。國立體育學院論叢，12-2。
林雍智（2000）。台北市國民小學實施學校本位管理與教師工作滿意關係之研究。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
姜定宇（2000）效忠主管、組織承諾及員工效能：五種模式的驗證。國立台灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
姜定宇、鄭伯壎、任金剛、黃政瑋 (2003)。組織忠誠：本土化的建構與測量。 本土心理學研究，47(2)，273-337。
范熾文(2005)。國小校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究。臺中教育大學學報：教育類，19(2)，1-22。
郭建志、章珮瑜、鄭伯壎 (2002)。學校文化對教師效能的影響：以我國國民小學為例。應用心理研究，19，175-209。
張瑞村(2003)。職業學校教師組織承諾與教師效能關係之研究。朝陽學報，37-69。
許義雄（1991）。體育授課時數與教學品質，學校體育雙月刊，1(2)，2-3。
黃金柱（1979）。國民中小學體育教師專業態度之調查研究。國立台灣師範大學體育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
黃曼君（2004）良師行為、組織與專業承諾多元構面對離職傾向、組織公民行為之影響：以決策參與為干擾變項。國立彰化師範大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化。
程瑞福（2000）。台灣地區中小學體育教師專業能力之研究。體育學報，28，123-132。
楊益民（2001）。國民小學教師工作滿意度評量之研究。台南師範學院學校行政碩士學位班碩士論文，未出版，台南。
廖年淼、何信助、賴銘娟(2004)。高級職業學校組織文化與教師組織承諾關係之研究。中正教育研究，3(2)，69-96。
蔡進雄(2005a)。超越轉型領導：國民中小學校長新轉型領導影響教師組織承諾之研究。國民教育研究集刊，13，37-63。
賴明政(2004)。企業倫理行為、組織承諾、工作滿足與組織公民行為關係之研究。企業管理學報，60，31-59。
謝百亮（1995）。國民小學行政管理與教師工作滿意之關係。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中。
二、英文部分
Adams, J.-S., (1963).-Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 67, 422–436.。
Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizationalcitizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 277–289.
Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, G. D., & Klesh, J. R. (1983). in Price, J. L. and Mueller, C. W. (Eds), Handbook of Organizational Measurement, 1986, Pitman Publishing, Marshfield, MA.
Davis, K. (1984). Human relation and organizational behavior. New York: Free Press.
Engel, J. F.; Blackwall, R. D. & Miniard, P. W. (1986). Consumer Behavior. New York: The dryclen dress.
Francken, D. A.& Van Raaij, W. F.(1981). Satisfaction with leisure time activities. Journal of Leisure Research, 13, 337-352.
Fresko, B., Kfir, D., & Nasser, F. (1997). Predicting teacher commitment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 429-438.
Getzels, J. W. , Lipham, J. M. ,& Campbell, R. P. (1968). Educational administration as a social process. New York: Harper & Row.
Greenberg, J. (2002). managing behavior in organizations. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Hoppock,R. (1935). Job satisfaction. New York: Harper.
Lemons, M. A., & Jones, C. A. (2001). Procedural justice in promotion decisions: using perceptions of fairness to build employee commitment. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 16(4) 268-280.
Leong, C. S., Furnham, A., & Cooper, C. L. (1996). The moderating effect of organizational commitment on the occupational stress outcome relationship. Human Relations, 49(10), 1345-1363.
Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition : a report on knowledge. Translated by Bennington, G. and Massumi, B. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
Martin, C. L.(1988). Enhancing Children’s Satisfaction and Participation Using a Predictive Regression Model of Bowling Performance Norms. The Physical Educator,45(4),196-209.
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538-551.
Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages. New York: Academic Press.
Mueller, C. W., Finley, A., Iverson, R. D., & Price, J. L. (1999). The effects of group racial composition on job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and career commitment: The case of teachers. Work and Occupations, 26(2), 187-209.
Osborne, M. D., & Barton, A. C. (2000). Science for all Americans：critiquing science education reform efforts. In Cornbleth, C. (Ed.) Curriculum politics, policy, practice：case in context. New York：State University of New York.
Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603-609.
Porter, L. W., William, J. C., & Smith, F. J. (1976). Organization commitment and managerial turnover : A longitudinal study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 543-565.
Price, J. L.(1972). Handbook of organizational measurement. Lexington, D. C. Health.
Reyes, P. (1990). What research has to say about commitment, performance and productivity. In P. Reyes (Ed.), Teachers and their workplace: Commitment, performance and productivity. 15-21. Newbury Park, California: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Tough, A.(1982). Some major reasons for learning. Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 033251.
Wise, A.E., (1990). Six steps to teacher professionalism. Educational Leadership, 47(7), 57-60.