研究生: |
董馨梅 Tung, Hsin-Mei |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
我國大專校院經濟弱勢學生獎助學金制度之研究 The research on the Taiwan student aid systems for economically underprivileged college students |
指導教授: |
許添明
Sheu, Tian-Ming |
學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
系所名稱: |
教育學系 Department of Education |
論文出版年: | 2016 |
畢業學年度: | 104 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 178 |
中文關鍵詞: | 經濟弱勢學生 、獎助學金制度 、就學費用缺口 |
英文關鍵詞: | economically underprivileged students, student aid system, lack of schooling resources |
DOI URL: | https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202204953 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:209 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本文主要透過文獻分析法與訪談法,檢視我國大專校院經濟弱勢學生獎助學金制度。首先從理論為探究起點,並研究美國與我國制度現況。其次,以就學費用減去可得到的協助就學資源,估算就學費用缺口,發現三類經濟弱勢學生實際上皆不足。研究者以「大專校院經濟弱勢學生協助就學措施改善方案」(草案) ,作為焦點團體訪談以及個別訪談的工具。獲得下述結論:一是經濟弱勢學生實際就學所需不足,二是助學措施名詞易生混淆,三是助學訊息零散,四是社政單位協助經濟弱勢者積極度不足。文末提出短、中、長三期程的建議,以減小就學費用缺口,協助經濟弱勢學生順利就學。
The research examines the Taiwan student aid system for college underprivileged students. First, it begins from the relative theories and the current status in the United States and Taiwan. Secondly, the amount schooling expenses deducting available schooling aid is schooling deficit. The three kinds of students all face the deficit. The researcher proposes an improvement draft to implement Focused Group Interview and Individual Interview. The main conclusions are as following: (1) The actual student aid for economically underprivileged students schooling is not enough. (2) The term of each financial supporting way is confusing. (3) The financial supporting information is unintegrated. (4) The social welfare department helps economically underprivileged students with insufficient enthusiasm. The last part of the thesis has three-stage suggestions. The suggestions are to minimize the lack of schooling resources to help the students go to school as they hope.
中文部分
90萬人學貸(2007,2月18日)。中國時報,3版。
大專校院弱勢學生助學計畫(2007年8月3日)
大專校院弱勢學生助學計畫(2013年9月16日)
大專校院弱勢學生助學計畫(2015年7月24日)
中央研究院(2014)。賦稅改革政策建議書。臺北市:作者。
中華民國憲法(1947)
中華民國統計資訊網。2015年7月3日取自http://statdb.dgbas.gov.tw/pxweb/Dialog/price.asp
公私立大專校院共同助學措施實施方案(2005年5月12日)
王文科、王智弘(2007)。教育研究法。臺北市:五南。
王如哲、楊瑩、劉秀曦、張珍瑋(2013)。我國推動經濟弱勢學生之人才培育政策分析與發展。行政院經濟建設委員會((102)010.802)。臺北市:社團法人台灣高等教育學會。
行政院主計處(2012)。人力運用調查報告。臺北市:作者。
行政院主計處(2013)。101年家庭收支調查報告。臺北市:作者。
行政院主計處(2014)。102年家庭收支調查報告。臺北市:作者。
行政院勞工委員會(今為勞動部)(2006)。大學生打工狀況調查統計。臺北市:作者。
社會救助法(2011年7月1日)
低收入戶學生及中低收入戶學生就讀高級中等以上學校學雜費減免辦法(2011)
吳定(2003)。政策管理。臺北市:聯經。
沈美真、吳豐山(2010)。大專校院弱勢學生助學計畫調查報告。監察院調查報告(0990800582)。臺北市:監察院。
注入活水,財政有元氣。台北市:財政部。2015年5月1日,取自:http://www.ey.gov.tw/News_Content16.aspx?n=E9B83B707737B701&s=C4A85FD5E7EAFF01
周祝瑛(2007)。學雜費之外:臺灣地區大學生教育費用之研究。教育研究月刊,154,110-123。
周陽山、馬以工(2011)。監察院九十九年度教育資源配置與運用之研究專案調查研究報告。臺北市:監察院。
胡幼慧(1996)。焦點團體法。載於質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例,(頁223-237)。臺北市:巨流。
高級中等以上學校學生就學貸款辦法(2012)
高級中等以上學校學生就學貸款信用保證要點(2012)
高、低所得家庭受高等教育比率(無日期)。2014年1月3日,取自https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/important/OVERVIEW_Y05.XLS
財團法人台灣兒童暨家庭扶助基金會(2014)。大專生工讀狀況調查分析報告。臺北市:作者。
陳心儂(2011)。大學時期工讀經驗對畢業成績及初期薪資之影響。東吳大學經濟學系研究所,未出版,臺北市。
張可婷(譯)(2010)。R. Barbour著。焦點團體研究法(Doing focus groups)。新北市:韋伯文化。
教育部(2012a)。「高級中等以上學校學生就學貸款政策簡介」。2013年4月20日,取自http://helpdreams.moe.edu.tw/hd/upload/就學貸款政策簡介1010427.pdf
教育部(2012d)。 學費調漲及高等教育資源分配原則與方式之檢討報告。臺北市:作者。
教育部(2012f)。92年-101年就學貸款利率變動一覽表。2014年8月1日,取自 https://helpdreams.moe.edu.tw/hd/upload/92-101年就學貸款利率變動一覽表.pdf
教育部(2013a)。102年度教育部預算案。2014年2月5日,取自http://www.edu.tw/userfiles/url/20121227142606/102%E5%B9%B4%E5%BA%A6%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E9%83%A8%E5%96%AE%E4%BD%8D%E9%A0%90%E7%AE%97%E6%A1%88.pdf
教育部(2013)。常態性大專學雜費調整方案草案報告。臺北市:作者。
教育部(2014)。教育,實現夢想的力量–大專校院助學措施。臺北市:作者。
教育部(2015)。大專校院弱勢助學措施成果及未來策略報告。臺北市:作者。
教育部(2015)。教育部訂出今年8月各大學學雜費可漲1.89%到5%申請案,為近10年來最大調幅,對弱勢學生所造成之影響衝擊書面報告。臺北市:作者。
教育部(2015)。大專校院弱勢學生助學計畫修正對照表。臺北市:作者。
教育部高教司(無日期)。邁向頂尖大學計畫期中考評結果與新申請學校審議結果公布。2015年1月1日,取自http://www.edu.tw/pages/detail.aspx?Node=1088&Page=22954&Index=3&wid=C0746986-1231-4472-ABCE-5C5396450BA9
教育部統計處(2014)。大專校院學雜費減免情形。2014年9月1日,取自http://www.edu.tw/pages/detail.aspx?Node=4076&Page=20047&Index=5&WID=31d75a44-efff-4c44-a075-15a9eb7aecdf
教育部統計處(2014)。大專校院弱勢學生助學計劃「助學金」成效。2014年9月1日,取自http://www.edu.tw/pages/detail.aspx?Node=4076&Page=20047&Index=5&WID=31d75a44-efff-4c44-a075-15a9eb7aecdf
教育部統計處(2015,5月12日)。近年經濟弱勢生以多元管道進入大學之概況分析。教育統計簡訊,34。2015年6月10日,取自http://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/brief/近年經濟弱勢生以多元管道進入大學之概況分析.pdf
教育部學產基金設置低收入戶學生助學金實施要點(2014年11月19日)
教育部大專校院校務資訊公開平台(2015)。學生宿舍床位數(學務面第一則 訊息)。發表於http://udb.moe.edu.tw/Home/Download
郭姿妤(2015)。父母移轉金、打工行為與學業成績之研究。國立台灣大學農 業經濟學研究所,未出版,臺北市。
張瀞文(2013年5月)。大學社會新鮮人就業率大調查領先排名。商業週刊,1328,120-124、126、128。
彭淮南(2007)。中央銀行之功能。中央銀行季刊,29(3),5-22。
彭森明(2005,3月)。高等教育如何趨向公平化。載於國立清華大學高等教育研究中心舉辦之「台灣高等教育資料庫之建置及相關議題之探討」第一階段成果報告研討會論文集(頁119-127),新竹市。
黃政傑(2000)。課程評鑑。台北:師大書苑。
黃瑞琴(2001)。質的教育研究方法。臺北市:心理。
廖月娟(譯)(2013)。J. D. Sachs著。文明的代價(The price of civilization)。臺北市:天下文化。
歐用生(1999)。質的研究。臺北市:師大書苑。
彈性調整學雜費方案(1999年4月28日)
劉金山(2009)。臺灣高等教育助學機制評鑑之研究:運用理論導向模式。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,臺北市,未出版。
劉孟奇、邱俊榮、胡均立(2006)。在正式教育中提升就業力-大專畢業生就業 力調查報告。臺北市:行政院青年輔導委員會。
歐素汝(譯)(1999)。David W. Stewart & Prem N. Shamdasani著。焦點團體:理論與實務(Focus Groups: Theory and Practice)。臺北:弘志文化。
潘慧玲(2003)。緒論:學術探究的典範與取徑。載於潘慧玲(主編),教育研究125 方法論:觀點與方法(頁 1-23)。臺北市:心理。
謝文瑾(2014)。高等教育學雜費之公共論述:以臺灣學生團體為例。國立台灣師範大學教育政策與行政研究所,未出版,臺北市。
衛生福利部社會救助及社工司(2014)。歷年最低生活費一覽表。2015年5月6日,取自 http://www.mohw.gov.tw/CHT/DOSAASW/DM1.aspx?f_list_no=114&fod_list_no=1552
賴怡芳(2014)。理想與現實之間!自行負擔費用的大學生之生活。靜宜大學社會工作與兒童少年福利學系,未出版,台中市。
蕭霖(2010)。我國高等教育的品質、學費以及學生選擇之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告(NSC 97-2410-H-260-015-)。南投縣:國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政學系。
蕭霖(2012)。就學貸款的學生攤還負擔與政府財政支出。教育研究月刊,219, 62-78。
蕭珮姍(2011)。變動的軸線-教育到就業生命歷程與就學貸款政策。國立中正大學社會福利研究所碩士論文,嘉義縣,未出版。
魏惠娟(2004)。焦點團體。載於謝臥龍主編,質性研究(頁273-315)。臺北市:心理。
羅耀宗(譯)(2013)。J. E. Stiglitz著。不公平的代價(The price of inequality)。臺北市:天下。
外文部分
Alliance for excellent education (2012). A system in need of repair: an examination of federal student aid for postsecondary education. Washington: Alliance for excellent education.
Alliance for excellent education (2013). Repairing a broken system: fixing federal student aid. Washington: Alliance for excellent education.
Baum, S., & O'Malley, M. (2003). College on Credit: How borrowers perceive their education debt. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 33(3).Retrieved October, 20, 2013, from http://publications.nasfaa.org/jsfa/vol33/iss3/1
Baum, S., & McPherson, M.(2008). Introduction. In B. Sandy, M. McPherson, P. Steele, & College entrance examination board (Eds.), The effectiveness of student aid policies: what the research tells us (pp. 1-8). New York: The college board.
Baum, S., Little, K., Ma, A., & Sturtevant, A. (2012). Simplifying student aid: what it would mean for state. New York, NY: The college board.
Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Bettinger, E. (2004). How financial aid affects persistence. In C. M. Hoxby (Ed.), College choice: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 207-237). Cambridge, MA: University of Chicago Press.
Burdman, P. (2005). The student debt dilemma: Debt aversion as a barrier to college access. Berkeley, CA: Center for Studies in Higher Education, the University of California.
Cabrera, A. F., Stampen, J. O., & Hansen, W. Lee (1990). Exploring the effects of ability to pay on persistence in college. The Review of Higher education, 13(3), 303-336.
Campaigne, D.A., & Hossler, D. (1998). How do loans affect the educational decisions of students? In R. Fossey & M. Bateman (Eds.), Condemning students to debt (pp. 85–104). New York: Teachers College Press.
Chen, R. (2008). Financial aid and student dropout in higher education: a heterogeneous research approach. Handbook of theory and research, 23, 209-239.
Clayton, J. S. (2012). Information constraints and financial aid policy. Cambridge, MA: National bureau of economic research (Working paper 17811).
Cochrane, D. F., Lamanque, A., Irons, L. S. K. E., & Asher, L. (2010). After The FAFSA: how red tape can prevent eligible students from receiving financial aid. Oakland, CA: the institute for college access & success.
Cofer, J., & Somers, P. (2000). A comparison of the influence of debtload on the persistence of students at public and private colleges. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 30(2), 39–58.
Dowd, A. C. , & Coury, T. (2006). The effect of loans on the persistence and attainment of community college students. Research in higher education, 47(1), 33-62.
Doyle, W. R. (2008). Access, choice, and excellence: the competing goals of state student financial aid programs. In B. Sandy, M. McPherson, P. Steele, & College entrance examination board (Eds.), The effectiveness of student aid policies: what the research tells us (pp. 161-188). New York: The college board.
Dynarski, S., & Wiederspan, M. (2012). Student aid simplification: looking back and looking ahead. National tax journal,65(1), 211-234.
Feeney, M., & Heroff, J. (2013). Barriers to need-based financial aid: predictors of timely FAFSA completion among low-income students. Journal of student financial aid, 43(2), 64-85.
Gillen, A. (2009). Financial Aid in Theory and Practice: Why It Is Ineffective and What Can Be Done About It. Washington, DC: The Center for College Affordability and Productivity.
Gladieux, L. E. (2002). Federal student aid in historical perspective. In D. E. Heller (Ed.), Condition of access: higher education for lower income students (pp. 45-57). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Gladieux, L., & Perna, L. (2005). Borrowers Who Drop Out: A Neglected Aspect of the College Student Loan Trend. CA: The National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education.
Hearn, J. C., & Holdsworth, J. M. (2004). Federal student aid: the shift from grants to loans. In E. P. St. John & M.D. Parsons(Eds.), Public funding of higher education (pp. 41-59). Baltimore : The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Heller, D. E. (2008). The impact of student loans on college access. In B. Sandy, M. McPherson, P. Steele, & College entrance examination board (Eds.), The effectiveness of student aid policies: what the research tells us (pp. 39-68). New York: The college board.
Higher Education. (n.d.). Retrieved December 12, 2013, from https://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/education/higher-education
Higher Education Amendments of 1992, S. 1150, 102nd Cong. (1991-1992)
Hoxby, C., & Avery, C. (2013). The Missing “One-Offs”: The Hidden Supply of High-Achieving, Low-Income Students. Retrieved January 20, 2014, from http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/projects/bpea/spring%202013/2013a_hoxby.pdf
Johnstone, D. B. (2005). Higher educational accessibility and financial viability: The role of student loans. Retrieved September 3, 2012, from http://gse.buffalo.edu/org/IntHigherEdfinance/files/Publications/student_loans/(2005)_Higher_Education_Accessibility_and_Financial_Viability_the_Role_of_Stud ent_Loans.pdf
Johnstone, D. B., & Marcucci, P. N. (2010). Financing higher education worldwide: who pays? Who should pay? Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lee, J. B. (2002). An issue of equity. In D. E. Heller (Ed.), Condition of access: higher education for lower income students (pp. 25-44). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Lewin, T. (2011, September 27). College Graduation Rates Are Stagnant Even as Enrollment Rises, a Study Finds. The New York Times. Retrieved October 21, 2013, from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/27/education/27remediation.html?_r=2&ref=education&
Li, J. A. (1999). Estimating the Effect of Federal Financial Aid on Higher Education: A Study of Pell Grants. Unpublished manuscript.
Long, B. T. (2004). How do financial aid policies affect colleges? The institutional impact of the Georgia HOPE scholarship. Journal of Human Resources, 39(3), 1045-1066.
Long, B. T. (2008). What is known about the impact of financial aid? Implications for policy. Retrieved November 12, 2012, from http://www.postsecondaryresearch.org/i/a/document/6963_LongFinAid.pdf
Lynch, M., Engle, J., & Cruz, J. L. (2011). Priced out: how the wrong financial-aid policies hurt low-income students. Washington, DC: The education trust.
Mahan, S. M. (2011). Federal Pell grant program of the higher education act: background, recent changes, and current legislative issues. Washington: Congressional Research Service.
McDonough, P.M., & Calderone, S. (2006). The meaning of money: Perceptual differences between college counselors and low-income families about college costs and financial aid. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(12), 1703–1718.
McPherson, M. S., & Schapiro, M. O. (1998). The student aid game: meeting need and rewarding talent in American Higher education.UK: Princeton University press.
McPherson, M. S., & Schapiro, M. O. (2002). Changing patterns of institutional aid: impact on access and education policy. In D. E. Heller (Ed.), Condition of access: higher education for lower income students (pp. 73-94). Westport, CT: Praeger.
McPherson, M. S., & Schapiro, M. O. (2006). US higher education finance. In E. Hanushek & F. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 2, pp. 1403-1434). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
McSwain, C. (2008). Window of opportunity: targeting federal grant aid to students with the lowest incomes. Washington: The institute for higher education policy.
Mendoza, P., Mendez, J. P., & Malcolm, Z. (2009). Financial aid and persistence in community colleges: assessing the effectiveness of federal and state financial aid program in Oklahoma. Community college review, 37(2), 112-135.
Mercer, C. (2005). Federal Pell Grants: Implications of increasing the maximum award. Washington, DC: CRS Report for Congress. (Order Code: RL32923)
Mishory, J., & O’ Sullivan, R. (2012). The student perspective on federal financial aid reform. Washington, D. C.: Young invincibles.
Mundel, D. (2008). What do we know about the impact of grants to college students? In B. Sandy, M. McPherson, P. Steele, & College entrance examination board (Eds.), The effectiveness of student aid policies: what the research tells us (pp. 39-68). New York: The college board.
Mundel, D., & Rice, L. (2008). The impact of increases in Pell Grant awards on college-going among lower income youth. Washington, D. C.: Center on children and families.
National association of student financial aid administrator (2013). National student aid profile: overview of 2013 federal programs. Washington: NASFAA.
OECD(2008). Matching funding strategies with national priorities. In Tertiary education for the knowledge society: Volume 1 and Volume 2 (pp.163-257). Paris: OECD Press.
OECD(2010). Education at a glance. Paris: Author.
Paulsen, M.B., & St. John, E.P. (1997). The financial nexus between college choice and persistence. New directions for institutional research, 1997(95), 65-82.
Paulsen, M.B., & St. John, E.P. (2002). Social class and college costs: Examining the financial nexus between college choice and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(2). 189-231.
Perna, L.W. (2000). Differences in the decision to attend college among African Americans, Hispanics, and whites. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(2), 117–141.
Perna, L.W. (2006). Understanding the relationship between information about college prices and financial aid and students’ college-related behaviors. American Behavioral Scientist ,49(12), 1620-1635.
Phipps, R. A., Santos, J. L., & Merisotis, J. P.(2005). Investing in Arizona’s future: college access, affordability and the impact of investment in need-based financial aid. Washington, DC: Institute for higher education policy & Latina/o policy research initiative.
Redd, K. E. (1999). The changing characteristics of undergraduate borrowers. In J. E. King (Ed.), Financing a College Education: How It Works, How It's Changing (pp.78-97). Westport: The Oryx press.
Sara G. R., Douglas N. H., & Philip A. T. (2009). Why financial aid matters (or does not) for college success: toward a new interdisciplinary perspective. Higher education: handbook of theory and research, 24, 1-45.
Sen, A. (1995). The Political Economy of Targeting. In D. Walle & K. Nead (Eds.), Public spending and the poor (pp. 11-24). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Shah, N., & Hefling, K. (2015, August 10). Hillary's $350 billion plan to kill college debt: No family and no student should have to borrow to pay tuition at a public college or university. Retrieved September 1, 2015, from http://www.politico.com/story/2015/08/hillary-clintons-350-billion-plan-to-kill-college-debt-121210
St. John, E. P., & Asker, E. H. (2001). The role of finances in student choice: A review of theory and research. In Paulsen, M. B. & Smart, J. C. (Eds.), The finance of higher education: Theory, research, policy& practice (pp. 419-438). NY: Agathon Press.
Tanner, R. M., & Association of public and Land-Grant universities (2012). Federal student aid: access and completion. Washington, DC: APLU.
Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, H. R. 2014, 105th Cong. (1997-1998).
Tekleselassie, A. A., & Johnstone, D. B. (2004). Means testing: the dilemma of targeting subsidies in African higher education. JHER/RESA, 2(2), 135-158.
The advisory committee on student financial assistance (2005). The student aid gauntlet: making access to college simple and certain. Washington: The advisory committee on student financial assistance.
The advisory committee on student financial assistance (2008a). The student aid gauntlet: making access to college simple and certain. Washington: The advisory committee on student financial assistance.
The advisory committee on student financial assistance (2008b). Apply to succeed: ensure community college students benefit from need-based financial aid. Washington: The advisory committee on student financial assistance.
The institute for college access & success (2010). High hopes, big debts. Washington: TICAS.
The institute for college access & success (2013). Student debt and the class of 2012. Washington: TICAS.
The White House(2009). Investing in Pell Grants to make college affordable. Retrieved November 20, 2013 from
https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/100326-pell-fact-sheet.pdf
The White House (2012). Presidential Memorandum--Improving Repayment Options for Federal Student Loan Borrowers. Retrieved November 20, 2013 from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/06/07/presidential-memorandm-improving-repayment-options-federal-student-loan
Turner, L. J. (2012). The incidence of student financial aid: evidence from the Pell Grant Program. Retrieved October 10, 2013, from
http://econweb.umd.edu/~turner/LTurner_FedAid_Apr2012.pdf
Washington higher education coordinating board (2010). Keeping college affordable: annual report on state financial aid programs. Washington, D. C. : Washington higher education coordinating board.
Ziderman, A., & Albrecht, D. (1995). Financing universities in developing countries. Washington, D. C.: Falmer.
Zuehlke, E. (2008). College enrollment rate increases, but financial challenges bring uncertainty. Retrieved November 13, 2013, from
http://www.prb.org/Publications/Articles/2008/collegeaccess.aspx