在企業眾多的競爭力理論中，本研究主要針對人力資本部分中的「個人創新思維」能力，是否能透過創新教學，達到個人創新思維提升的可能性，同時在工作上亦能有創新作為之探討與研究。
人，是企業的根本。本研究旨在探討「人力資本」在眾多企業競爭力的項目中可以扮演的角色。如果，人是企業的基石，那麼個人創新能力的提升，是否對企業整體競爭力亦有所助益。
本研究會討論目前在台灣教育界之「創新教學」的實質意涵與現況，來佐證本研究中創新教學的價值與必要性。本研究之創新教學是以「普林斯頓超強記憶訓練系統」為例，研究中將呈現「記憶訓練」的實質教學內容與過程，並以「法國巴黎人壽」與「緯創資通」兩家企業的員工為授課對象，對上課人員做後續兩個月的成果追蹤，針對上課的學員以質性的訪談法來呈現「記憶訓練」與「創新思維」之間的關聯性。「創新思維」在本研究中主要是指個人思考慣性的改變與進步的狀態。判讀的方式會包括「左右腦的運用」、「垂直思考與水平思考」、「曼陀羅思考法」等策略工具，來呈現「創新思維」與「非創新思維」的差異性。
本研究的理論基礎是，「記憶」(學習上的記憶能力)是大腦輸入知識或資訊的過程，「創意」就是大腦輸出創新或創造力的成果。有效的記憶訓練，不僅能讓學習者擁有並活用知識與資訊，而這段學習的過程，更是鍛鍊思維與提升創意的珍貴歷程。創新思維就是不斷與時俱進的思維，不墨守成規、不固步自封，就是創新。
本研究最後驗證後並提出創新教學對企業人力資本的實質影響，供學術與企業界在企業教育訓練的安排上，有更多元的選擇。

This is a research focused on “Individual Innovative Thinking Skill” in Human Capital to see if it is possible to promote such skill through innovative teaching and to work in an innovative manner.
People are the foundation of an enterprise. The goal of this research looks into the roles “Human Capital” play within enterprise competitiveness. That is, if people are the cornerstone of an enterprise, how beneficial improving individual innovation will be to the overall enterprise competitiveness.
This research will further discuss the real meaning of “Innovative Teaching” and its current circumstances to prove the value and necessity of innovative teaching in this research. Examples for Innovative Teaching of this research are derived from “Princeton Ultra Memory Training System”. Authentic teaching content and process of “Memory Training” are presented throughout the whole research. The target groups are employees at “BNP Paribas CARDIF Assurance Vie” and “Wistron”. We also conducted a two-month follow-up and interviewed the participants with a qualitative approach in attempt to show the relationship between “Memory Training” and “Innovative Thinking”. “Innovative Thinking” refers to the habitual state of change and improvement of an individual. It was recognized with strategic tools such as “Utilization of Left/Right Brain”, “Vertical vs. Horizontal Thinking” and “Mandala Thinking” to represent the difference between “Innovative Thinking” and “Non-Innovative Thinking”.
The foundation of this research indicates that if “Memory” (the ability to memorize while learning) means the process of knowledge or information input into the brains, “Creativity” will be the result of innovation output of the brains. Efficient memory training gives learners knowledge and information, and at the same time teaches them how to apply throughout the journey of learning to strengthen one’s mind and enhance his or her own creativity. Innovative Thinking is used to evolve continuously, to break all rules and boundaries.
The reach will provide new and creative choices of training for enterprises and also the creative training influence of man power resource in companies.

參考文獻
一、中文參考文獻(按筆畫)
中華人事管理協會(2018)。企業管理課程、主管職能課程、企業經營管理課程財務管理與稽核課程、辦公室應用、秘書、行政人員與高階幕僚進修課程、總務採購課程。(http://www.hr.org.tw/)
李麗香(2004)。國小教師創意教學與學生自我概念學習動機學習策略及學習成。國民中小學創意教學之推行(陳秀芸)。 (http://www.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/85/85-10.htm)
杜云月，葉香梅(2002)。企業核心競爭力研究綜述。(3：59~63)。
林玫伶(2018)。創新教學策略與實務。林姿綺整理。(www.scu.edu.tw/edu/Documents/publication/34th/342.htm )
彼得.F.德魯克(1909-2005)。創新與組織展。
彼得 杜拉克(2011)。管理實務與精神。。
約瑟夫.A.熊彼德(1912)。經濟發展理論。創新理論。
陳清泰(1999)。企業應該做什麼，能夠做甚麼。人民日報。
黃惠君(2006)。國中教師教學玩興、教學動機、教學快樂感受與創意教學的關係。 (http://ericdata.com/tw/detail.aspx?no=51037&listkey=)
黃阿芬，(2018)。職場個人學習、創新效能感、工作動機、創造力及工作績效之
關係-以組織創新氛圍為跨層次調節效果。
黃明漢(2018)。神基科技董事長兼總經理。臺師大EMBA卓越企業。
麥可波特(1979)。企業競爭概念。五種競爭作用力。
理查.阿特金森。裡查.謝弗林(2018)。記憶的三階段。維基百科。
策略管理的智慧(2019/9/19)。核心競爭力。MBA智慧百科。
張仁家(2011)。高職教師的創新教學行為與背景變項之關係研究。
張維迎(2018)。北京大學光華管理學院(Guanghua School of Management,Peking University)。華人百科。
楊帥與蔣洪瑞(2010/12)。企業核心競爭力理論綜述，
劉穎馥(2004)。企業教育訓練對員工創新影響之探討。
羅倫新(2003)。談創新教學的知與行。

二、英文參考文獻
Amabile,T.M.(1983，1996).The social psychology of creativity. New York:Springer-Verlag.
Amabile,T.M. & Gryskiewicz,S.S. (1987).Creativity in the R&D Raboratory Center for Creative Leadership.
Amabile,T.M.(1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations.
Amabile,T.M.(1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1).123-167.
Amabile,T.M.(1997). Entrepreneurial creativity through motivational synergy. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(1),18-26.
Amabile,T.M.(1997).Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review,40910,39-58
Barron,F.(1968) Creativity and personal freedom. New York: Van Nostrand.
Duncan & Hoffman(1981). The incidence and wage effects of overeducation.
Guilford,J.P.(1986). Creativity talents:Their Nature uses and Development. New York:Beaqrly.
Jackson et al(1989). Synthesis of lipid-linked oligosaccharides in saccharomyces.
Keep.E(1989).Corporate training: New perspective on Human Resource Management.
MacDuffie(1995). Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance.
Mayer,R.E.(1999). 22 Fifty years of creativity Research.
Pralahad(1990). Core Competence of the Corporation.
Patterson(1994).American’s struggle.
Raymond(2004).Training and Development.51(8)：73-77.
Sanderlin,O.(1971). Creative teaching. New Jersey:A.S. Barnes and CQ. Inc.
Snell and Dean(1992). Integrated Manufacturing and Human Resource Management.
Santos and Stuart(2003). Employee perceptions and their influence on training effectiveness.
Shalley and Gilson(2004).What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual.
Topalian(2000). Design Management: Organisation and Marketing Perspectives