研究生: |
洪佩玲 Hung, Pei-Ling |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
數位還是不數位?以動態能力觀點分析媒體數位轉型策略之個案研究 Digital or Non-Digital?Case Studies of Media Digital Transformation Strategies from the Perspective of Dynamic Capability |
指導教授: |
康敏平
Kang, Min-Ping |
口試委員: |
康敏平
Kang, Min-Ping 林舒柔 Lin, Shu-Jou 張朝清 Chang, Chao-Ching |
口試日期: | 2024/05/20 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
高階經理人企業管理碩士在職專班(EMBA) Executive Master of Business Administration |
論文出版年: | 2024 |
畢業學年度: | 112 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 80 |
中文關鍵詞: | 策略轉型 、學習課程 、媒體數位轉型 、資源基礎理論 、動態能力理論 |
英文關鍵詞: | strategic transformation, learning courses, Digital transformation of media, resource based theory, dynamic capabilities theory |
研究方法: | 次級資料分析 、 個案研究法 、 紮根理論法 、 深度訪談法 、 半結構式訪談法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202400553 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:166 下載:9 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
媒體過往營收來源主要仰賴紙本訂戶、廣告及活動收入為主,但被社群平台吸收了人流及廣告商效益,讓訂戶及廣告客戶的營收大幅衰退。在媒體產業險峻的態勢下,媒體都希望能夠將內容再利用,創造更多的獲利的可能性,轉型之路除了將內容的載體轉化為數位閱讀的形式,有些媒體轉往學習平台,也有媒體以內容為基底,作為吸引閱聽人到訪瞭解論壇、活動等訊息的平台,期待透過不同的管道,創造新的商業模式與多元營收。
本研究藉由資源基礎理論及Teece, Pisano, and Shuen(1997)等人提出的動態能力(dynamic capability)理論,從內容產製過程的三大路徑,檢視三家媒體的課程運作成為個案分析,在轉型過程中,如何透過偵查外部環境、運用內外部資源抓住機會,進而做到資源重新配置。本研究探索三家媒體如何運用司徒達賢的策略構面(2019)進行策略佈局達到經營績效。媒體因目標客群渴望學習機制,以既有組織班底,以內容產製的核心能力作為轉型轉折點,在產品與組織結構都與以往有不同延伸進行垂直整合的擴張規模,分別以策略轉型、功能轉型,打造以課程等平台,進而抓住市場契機。
本研究以組織動態能力理論加以驗證,從而深入瞭解動態能力的本質,快速彈性調整本身組織結構加以有效管理,來提升動態能力理論的應用範疇;透過組織管理的角度,加強相關知識的積累與能力的有所提升,建構組織的動態能力,以便因應競爭環境的快速變化,是本研究實務上的意涵所在。
In the past, media revenue sources mainly relied on paper subscribers, paper subscribers, advertising and event revenue, but social media platforms absorbed the benefits of foot traffic and advertisers, resulting in a significant decline in subscribers and advertisers' revenue. In addition to transforming the carrier of content into the form of digital reading, some media have transferred to learning platforms, and some media have taken content as the basis as a platform to attract readers to visit forums and activities to learn about information, looking forward to creating new business opportunities and diversified revenue through different channels. This study uses resource-based theory and the dynamic capability theory proposed by Teece, Pisano, and Shuen (1997) to examine the curriculum operations of three media companies from the three major paths of the content production process into a case analysis. During the transformation process, how to seize opportunities by investigating the external environment, using internal and external resources, and then reallocating resources. This study explores how three media companies use Szeto's strategic aspects (2019) to carry out strategic layout and achieve business performance. Because the target customer group is eager to learn the mechanism, the media uses the existing organizational team and the core capabilities of content production as a turning point for transformation. The products and organizational structures have different extensions from the past to expand the scale of vertical integration, respectively with strategic transformation, functional Transform and build platforms such as courses to seize market opportunities. This study verifies the Organizational Dynamic Capability Theory to gain a deeper understanding of the essence of dynamic capabilities. By rapidly and flexibly adjusting their organizational structures effectively, organizations aim to enhance the scope of application of dynamic capability theory. Through the lens of organizational management, accumulating relevant knowledge and improving capabilities strengthen organizational dynamic capabilities. This practical implication of the study is aimed at enabling organizations to adapt to the rapid changes in the competitive environment.
一、中文文獻
1.黃哲斌(2019)。《新聞不死,只是很喘:媒體數位的中年危機》。天下雜誌。
2.臺北市媒體服務代理會(2023)。《2023臺灣媒體白皮書》。
3.TWNIC財團法人台灣網路資訊中心(2023)。《2023年台灣網路報告》。
4.管理大師哈默爾(Gary Hamel)。《企業核心競爭力》(The Core Competence of the corporation)。
5.經理人月刊(2019)。打造無可取代的競爭優勢。取自:https://www.managertoday.com.tw/glossary/view/73。
6. 司徒達賢(2024.2)。策略管理講義。取自:https://gsba.nccu.edu.tw/seetoo/handouts.html。
7. 馮建三譯。Rebert Picard著。(1994)。《媒介經濟學》。臺北市:遠流。
8. 蘇建州(2019)。數位浪潮下 新聞媒體的轉型經營之路。《交流雜誌108年8月號第166期(歷史資料)》。
9. 溫金豐、林裘緒、錢書華(2011)。轉換型領導與組織認同:領導者組織典範性知覺的調節效果。《臺大管理論叢2011年6第21卷第2期》。
10.陳禹達(2014)。台灣中堅企業策略之研究(Barney,1991)(碩士論文)。
11.傳播與社會學刊第49期。小而美?注意力經濟視角下的傳媒盈利新模式初探:以廣州為例。《傳播與社會學刊第49期》。專輯論文。
12.雍惟畬、洪世章(2016)。以動態能力觀點探討明基的興起。管理與系統第十三卷第一期。
13.傑恩·巴尼(Jay B. Barney,1991)。《從內部尋求競爭優勢》。取自:https://www.jendow.com.tw/wiki/VRIO。
11.謝侑穎(2012)。台灣電影發行商能力建構途徑與美商合作關係之研究。碩士論文。
12.劉勇志、楊耀傑、王貴英(2009)。以知識管理觀點為基礎探討組織動態能力之影響因素(中山管理評論)。
13.司徒達賢(2001)。管理學的新世界。天下文化。
14.藍泳順(2006)。以動態能力探討日月光的興起。碩士論文。
15.司徒達賢(2019)。策略管理新論(第三版)。元照出版。
二、英文文獻
1.Robert M. Grant(1991)。The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation。California Mangement Review。
2.WM Cohen, DA Levinthal(1990)。Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation。《Strategic Learning in a Knowledge Economy》
3.Danny Miller and Jamal Shamsie(1996)In with the old, in with the new: Capabilities, strategies, and performance among the Hollywood studios。Strategic Management Journal。
4.Gary Pisano, Amy ShuenDynamic capabilities and strategic management。Strategic Management Journal。
5.David J. Teece(December 2007)。Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance。Strategic Management Journal 28(13):1319 - 1350
6 Kathleen M. Eisenhardt and Jeffrey A. Martin(Oct. - Nov., 2000)。Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They? Strategic Management Journal,Vol. 21, No. 10/11。
7. Giada di Stefa NO, Margaret Peteraf and Gianmario Verona(November 2014)。The Organizational Drivetrain: a Road To Integration Of Dynamic Capabilitites Reserch Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 307-327 (21 pages)
8. Helfat C. E. (2000) Guest Editor’s Introduction to the Special Issue: “The Evolution of Firm Capabilities”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, pp. 955-959.
9. Teece D. J., G. Pisano, & A. Shuen (1997) “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management”, Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7), pages 509-533