研究生: |
藍雅慧 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
知情意整合的國中生數學學習歷程模式之建構 |
指導教授: |
張景媛
Chang, Ching-Yuan |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
教育心理與輔導學系 Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling |
論文出版年: | 2002 |
畢業學年度: | 90 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 220 |
中文關鍵詞: | 數學學習 、結構方程模式 、模式產出 、學習動機 、學習情感 、意志 、學習表現 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:170 下載:28 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
中文摘要
本研究的主要目的有三:(一)探討並統整相關的學習模式與理論,建構知情意整合的國中生數學學習歷程模式;(二)以實徵性資料評估知情意整合的國中生數學學習歷程模式之品質;(三)歸納結論,以做為教師教學與輔導之參考。
為達成上述的研究目的,本研究首先提出一個包含情感/動機、意志控制、學習策略、學習表現四個潛在變項之知情意整合的國中生數學學習歷程初始模式,以台北縣、台北市、桃園縣、台中縣、彰化縣、高雄市、宜蘭縣、花蓮縣等地區的國中二年級學生,共468人為研究參與者,使用『數學學習情感/動機量表』、『數學學習意志控制量表』、『數學學習策略量表』、『數學學習表現量表』等工具,蒐集實徵資料。蒐集得的資料先以PRELES 2.50版統計套裝軟體進行多變項常態分配假設的考驗,再使用LISREL 8.50版統計套裝軟體,以一般加權最小平方法(generally weighted least-squares, WLS)進行模式的參數估計。結果發現,初始模式無法合理解釋地國中生數學學習歷程,在統計上亦不合理。因此,本研究再進行模式的修改,並重新對修改後的模式進行參數估計。修改後,知情意整合的國中生數學學習歷程模式(簡稱知情意模式)評估的結果發現,此模式能有效地用來說明實際資料。然而,知情意模式產出的過程經過修改,未來應再以其他的觀察資料進行本模式的檢驗,以探討本模式通則化的可能性。
綜合而論,本研究提出的知情意模式可以用來說明國中生數學學習的歷程。這顯示,國中生數學學習歷程涉及情感/動機、意志控制、學習策略、學習表現等成份,為了協助國中生有效地學習數學,應該同時考慮這些成份。
Abstract
The purposes of this research are to: 1) explore and integrate relevant learning models and theories, and construct the Cognitive-affective-volitional Integrated Model of Mathematical Learning Process for Junior High School Students, 2) evaluate the quality of the aforementioned model with empirical data, 3) come to a conclusion for junior high school teachers to refer to when they do their teaching and counseling work.
In the first place, the researcher proposed the initial model, which included the latent variables of affection/motivation, volition control, learning strategies, and learning performance. The research was applied to 468 second-graders in junior high school for the researcher to collect empirical data. The researcher first tested of the acquired data the hypothesis of multivariate normality distribution with PRELES 2.50, and then estimated the parameters of the model by means of generally weighted least-squares (WLS) with LISREL 8.50. The result showed that the initial model could not give a good account of the mathematical learning process for junior high school students, and the statistic results did not seem reasonable, either. Therefore, the researcher revised the model, and evaluated the parameters of the revised model. After revision, the evaluation results showed that the Cognitive-affective-volitional Integrated Model of Mathematical Learning Process for Junior High School Students (the cognitive-affective-volitional model, for short) could effectively explain the data. Though the process of model generating, however, has been revised, the model should be tested with other observation data in future, to see if the model could further be generalized.
All in all, the cognitive-affective-volitional model presented in this research can be applied to explain the process of learning mathematics for junior high school students. This indicates that variables of affection/motivation, volition control, learning strategies, and learning performance are all involved in the mathematical learning process for junior high school students. These elements should all be taken into consideration to help junior high school students to learn mathematics effectively.
中文部分
王慧婕(民89)。國中數學學習自我效能、目標導向及課室環境知覺與學業尋助之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
朱柔若譯(民89)。社會研究方法-質化與量化取向。台北:揚智。
林清山(民84)。多變項分析統計法。台北:東華。
林清山譯(民85)。教育心理學-認知取向。台北:遠流。
邱皓政(民90)。量化研究與統計分析。台北:五南。
岳修平譯(民87)。教學心理學-學習的認知基礎。台北:遠流。
洪寶蓮(民85)。內在動機與情意學習方案之發展及其團體輔導效能。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所博士論文,未出版,彰化市。
高明秀、許博雄譯(民79)。類別資料分析。台北:巨流。
許國輝譯(1995)。小學數學教育-智性學習。香港:公開進修學院。
郭生玉(民85)。心理與教育測驗。台北:精華書局。
教育部(民89)。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。台北:教育部。
教育部(民90a)。國民中學數學教科書-第三冊。台北:國立編譯館。
教育部(民90b)。國民中學數學教師手冊-第三冊。台北:國立編譯館。
黃月霞(民78)。情感教育與發展性輔導-「情緒課程」對兒童「態度」與「學業成績」的影響。台北:五南。
黃宜敏(民78)。歸因再訓練與正向自我參照敘述訓練對數學學習困難兒童的輔導效果。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
黃德祥(民79)。國中與國小學生數學焦慮與數學態度之分析研究。輔導學報,第13期,頁1-52。
黃德祥(民84)。學習輔導與學生發展。學生輔導通訊,38,頁22-31。
張春興(民83)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。台北:東華。
張春興(民84)。張氏心理學辭典。台北:東華。
張景然(民75)。國小學生親子關係、友伴關係、師生關係與學業成績之比較。輔導月刊,第22卷,第五期,頁37-40。
張景媛(民81)。自我調整、動機信念、選題策略與作業表現關係的研究暨自我調整訓練課程效果之評估。教育心理學報,25,頁201-244。
張景媛(民83)。國中生數學學習歷程統整模式的驗證及應用:學生建構數學概念的分析及數學文字題教學策略的研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。
陳正昌、程炳林(民90)。SPSS、SAS、BMDP統計軟體在多變量統計上的應用。台北:五南。
陳李綢(民80)。多重智力理論模式的驗證與智力的促進。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。
曾憲政(民86)。課程改革-教育改革的軟體工程。教育天地,89期,頁4-10。
程炳林(民80)。國民中小學生激勵的學習策略之相關研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
程炳林(民84)。自我調整學習的模式驗證及其教學效果之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。
程炳林(民90)。動機、目標設定、行動控制、學習策略之關係:自我調整學習歷程模式之建構及驗證。師大學報:教育類,46(1),頁67-92。
趙柏原(民88)。國中學生自我效能、求助態度與課業求助行為之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
趙曉美(民78)。歸因再訓練策略與成敗比率對國小低成就動機兒童的成就動機、自我概念、堅持力及歸因方式之影響。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
鄭蕙如(民90)。九年一貫課程數學領域評鑑工具發展之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
魏麗敏(民78)。國小學生數學焦慮、數學態度與數學成就之關係。測驗年刊,第36輯,頁47-60。
英文部分
Allport, G. W., Vernon, P. E., & Lindzey, G. (1960). Study of Values: A scale for measuring the dominant interests in personality (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260-267.
Arbreton, A. (1998). Student goal orientation and help-seeking strategy use. In S. A. Karabenick (Ed.), Strategic help seeking: Implications for learning and teaching (pp. 95-116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academic of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.
Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp.353-394). New York: Longman.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: David Mckay.
Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36(2), 129-148.
Brandt, R. S. (1987). Strategic teaching and learning: Cognitive instruction in the content areas. North Central Regional Educational Laborary.
Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.). Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp.65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Corno, L. (1986). The metacognitive control components of self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 333-346.
Corno, L. (1989). Self-regulated learning : A volitional analysis. In B. J.
Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement : Theory, research, and practice(pp.111-142). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Corno, L. (1993). The best-laid plans: Modern conceptions of volition and
educational research. Educational Researcher, 22(2), 14-22.
Corno, L., & Kanfer, R. (1993). The role of volition in learning and performance. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 19, pp.301-341). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Cross, D. R., & Paris, S. G. (1988). Developmental and instructional analyses of children’s metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 131-142.
Dansereau. D. (1978). The development of a learning strategies curriculum. In H. F. O’Neil (Ed.), Learning strategies(pp.1-29). New York: Academic Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Dweck, C. S. (1975). The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(4), 674-685.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The Psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Entwistle, N. (1987). Motivation to learn: Conceptualisations and practicalities. British Journal of Educational studies, 35, 129-148.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children’s oral communication skills (pp. 35-60). New York: Academic Press.
Fraenkel, J. R. (1977). How to teach about values: An analytic approach.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. New York: Cambridge University.
Gagne’, E. D. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Gagne’, R. M. (1977). The conditions of learning (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Gardner, H. (1978). Commentary on animal awareness papers. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 572.
Gaus, G. F. (1990). Value and justification: The foundations of liberal theory. New York: Cambridge University.
Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-
Hall.
Heckhausen, H., & Kuhl, J. (1985). From wishes to action: The dead ends and short cuts on the long way to action. In M. Frese & J. Sabini(Eds.), Goal-directed behavior: The concept of action in psychology (pp. 134-159) . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hilgard, E. R. (1980). The trilogy of mind: Cognition, affection, and conation. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16, 107-117.
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Gorgoglione, J. M. (1987). The influence of positive affect on cognitive organization: Implications for education. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction: Vol. 3. Conative and affective process analyses (pp. 143-164). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (1992). Interest, learning, and development. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development(pp. 3-25). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kuhl, J. (1984). Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned
helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action control. In B. A. Maher & W. B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research:Normal personality processes (Vol. 13, pp. 99-170). New York: Academic Press.
Kuhl, J. (1985). Volitional mediators of cognition-behavior consistency:
Self-regulatory processes and action versus state orientation. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.). Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 101-128). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Kuhl, J., & Kazen-Saad, M. (1989). Volition and self-regulation: Memory
mechanisms mediating the maintenance of intentions. In W. A. Hershberger (Ed.), Volitional action : Conation and control(pp. 387-407). North Holland: Elsevier science.
Kurtz, B. E., & Borkowski, J. G. (1984). Children’s metacognition: Exploring relations among knowledge, process, and motivational variables. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 335-354.
Lester, F. K., & Kroll, D. L. (1991). Assessing student growth in mathematical problem solving. In G. Kulm (Ed.), Assessing Higher Order Thinking in Mathematics(pp.53-70). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction: Vol. 3. Conative and affective process analyses (pp. 223-253). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Marks, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual review of psychology, 38, 299-337.
Marshall, J. C. & Morton, J. (1978). On the mechanics of Emma. In A. Sinclair, R. J. Jarvella & W. J. M. Levelt (Eds.), The child’s conception of language (pp. 225-239). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Mayer, R. E. (1985). Learning in complex domains: A cognitive analysis
of computer programming. In G. H. Bower(Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation,(Vol. 19, pp. 89-130).
Mayer, R. E. (1987). Educational psychology: A cognitive approach. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1976). The achievement motive. New York: Irvington.
McCombs, B. L. (1984). Processes and skills underlying continuing intrinsic motivation to learn: Toward a definition of motivational skills training interventions. Educational Psychologist, 19, 199-218.
Meece, J., Blumefeld, P., & Hoyle, R. (1988). Students’ goal orientation and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 514-523.
Messick, S. (1987). Structural relationships across cognition, personality and style. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning and instruction: Vol. 3. Conative and affective process analyses (pp.35-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Morris, C. (1956). Varieties of human value. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Nadler, A. (1997). Personality and help seeking: Autonomous versus dependent seeking of help. In G. R. Pierce, B. Lakey, I. G. Sarason, & B. R. Sarason (Eds.), Sourcebook of social support and personality (pp. 379-407). New York: Plenum.
Nelson-Le Gall, S., Gumerman, R. A. & Scott-Jones, D. (1983). Instrumental help-seeking and everyday problem-solving: A developmental perspective. In B. M. DePaulo, A. Nadler & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), New directions in helping (Vol.2, pp. 265-283). New York: Academic Press.
Nelson-Le Gall, S. & Jones, E. (1990). Cognitive-motivational influences on the task-related help-seeking behavior of black children. Child Development, 61(2), 581-589.
Nuttin, J., & Lens, W. (1985). Future time perspective and motivation: Theory and research method. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Olson, J. M., & Zanna, M. P. (1993). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 117-154.
Paris, S. G., & Byrnes, J. P. (1989). The constructivist approach to
self-regulation and learning in the classroom. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp.169-200). New York: Springer-
Verlag.
Pekrun, R., & Frese, M. (1992). Emotions in work and achievement. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7, 153-200. New York: Wiley.
Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 6. Motivation-
enhancing environments (pp.117-160). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459-470.
Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students’ motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp.149-183). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
Posamentier, A. S., & Stepelman, J. (1995). Teaching secondary school
mathematics: Techniques and enrichment units (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
Prenzel, M. (1992). The selective persistence of interest. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development(pp. 71-398). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Renninger, K. A. (1992). Individual interest and development: Implications for theory and practice. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development(pp. 361-395). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Reynolds, A. J., & Walberg, H. J. (1992). A structural model of high school mathematics outcomes. Journal of Educational Research, 85(3), 150-158.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Macmillan.
Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3ƀ), 299-323.
Schunk, D. H. (1989). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement : Theory, research, and practice (pp.83-110). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Skemp, R. R. (1989). Mathematics in the primary school. London: Routledge.
Snow, R. E., Corno, L., & Jackson D. III. (1996). Individual differences in
affective and conative functions. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.),Handbook of educational psychology (pp.243-310). New York: Macmillan.
Snowman, J. (1986). Learning tactics and strategies. In G. D. Phye & T. Andre (Eds.), Cognitive classroom learning: understanding, thinking, and problem solving (pp. 243-275). New York: Academic Press.
TIMSS (Third International Mathematics and Science Study) (1996). TIMSS mathematics items: released set for population 2 (seventh and eighth grades). Boston: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement(IEA).
TIMSS-REPEAT (Third International Mathematics and Science Study-Repeat) (2000). TIMSS 1999 international mathematics report: Findings from IEA’s repeat of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study at the eighth grade. Boston: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement(IEA).
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university.
Weinert, F. E. (1987). Introduction and overview: Metacognition and motivation as determinants of effective learning and understanding. In F. E. Weinert, & R. H. Kluwe. Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp.1-16). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 315-327). New York: Macmillan.
Weinstein, C. E., & Underwood. V. L. (1985). Learning strategies: The how of learning. In J. W. Segal, S. F. Chipman. & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Relating instruction to research(pp. 241-258). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66(5), 297-333.
Wilson, J. W. (1971). In Bloom, B. S., Hastings J. T. & Madaus, G. F. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp.1-25). New York: Springer- Verlag.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp.3-24). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.