研究生: |
徐珮瑄 Hsu, Pei-Hsuan |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
企業社會責任與公司績效之關聯性—以身心障礙者與不同群族之僱用為例 The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: A Case Study on Employment of Persons with Disabilities and Different Minority Groups |
指導教授: |
徐美
Hsu, Mei |
口試委員: |
徐美
Hsu, Mei 陳明郎 Chen, Been-Lon 林常青 Lin, Chang-Ching |
口試日期: | 2024/07/09 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
全球經營與策略研究所 Graduate Institute of Global Business and Strategy |
論文出版年: | 2024 |
畢業學年度: | 112 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 82 |
中文關鍵詞: | 身心障礙進用 、性別多樣性 、中老年工作者 |
英文關鍵詞: | Disability Employment, Gender Diversity, Aging Workers |
研究方法: | 次級資料分析 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202400963 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:327 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
近年來,全球普遍倡導多元共融的風氣盛行,“多元、平等、共融”已不再只是口號,更成為社會的深刻使命,一種根植於尊重和包容多樣性的價值觀,此理念涉及不同文化、種族、性別、年齡、宗教和性取向群體之間的相互理解與融合,企業對弱勢群體的聘用是否能夠影響企業的績效成為關注焦點。本研究取用2011年至2022年上市上櫃公司作為此次研究對象,旨在探討身心障礙人士、性別多樣性以及中老年工作者之聘用與企業財務績效(ROA、ROE、EPS、Tobin’s Q)之間的關聯,進一步探討聘用弱勢群體對公司是否帶來積極效益。研究發現完全遵守身心障礙就業法規標準對企業的ROA和EPS呈現顯著負相關,而接近法規標準(身心障礙進用不足額介於0.1%~40%)對這些績效指標的提升效果更為顯著。董事會女性占比(BWOMEN)、BLAU指數、SHANNON指數對公司績效ROA、ROE、EPS、Q有正面影響,其中三者都對於Q有達到統計上的顯著效果。隨著員工年齡增加,ROA、ROE、EPS和Tobin's Q均呈現顯著負面影響,顯示員工年齡的增長,可能會對企業經營帶來挑戰。
In recent years, there has been a global surge in advocating for diversity and inclusion. "Diversity, equality, and inclusion" have evolved beyond mere slogans to become profound societal missions rooted in values of respect and acceptance of diversity. This concept encompasses mutual understanding and integration among different cultural, racial, gender, age, religious, and sexual orientation groups. Whether hiring disadvantaged groups impacts corporate performance has become a focal point of interest. This study uses listed companies from 2011 to 2022 as the research subjects, aiming to explore the relationship between the employment of individuals with disabilities, gender diversity, and older workers with corporate financial performance (ROA, ROE, EPS, Tobin's Q) and to further examine whether hiring disadvantaged groups brings positive benefits to companies.
The study finds that full compliance with disability employment regulations is significantly negatively correlated with ROA and EPS, while nearing compliance (disability employment shortfall between 0.1% and 40%) shows a more significant positive effect on these performance indicators. The proportion of women on the board (BWOMEN), BLAU index, and SHANNON index positively impact company performance in ROA, ROE, EPS, and Tobin's Q, with all three showing statistically significant effects on Tobin's Q. Additionally, as employee age increases, ROA, ROE, EPS, and Tobin's Q all exhibit significant negative effects, indicating that aging employees may pose challenges to corporate management.
朱貽莊. (2015). 臺灣 [企業進用] 視障按摩師的初探: 社會融入的觀點. 臺大社會工作學刊(32), 79-132.
池祥萱, 繆文娟, & 莊瀅臻. (2014). 企業社會責任對於公司財務績效之影響是雙面刃嗎? 來自全球 500 大公司的證據. Journal of Management, 31, 1-19.
李明機. (2009). 簡析企業社會責任 (CSR) 之發展趨勢. In: 證券櫃檯月刊.
郝鳳鳴, 崔曉倩, 藍科正, 陳毓雯, 徐雅媛, & 陳冠良. (2021). 中高齡者及高齡者就業困境與因應策略之研究. 勞動及職業安全衛生研究季刊, 29(2), 151-165.
陳立洲. (2020). 僱用身障人士與企業財務績效關係之研究-台灣上市櫃公司CSR實證分析 國立中央大學]. 臺灣碩士論文知識加值系統. 桃園縣. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/hm83ye
陳佳錚. (2019). 企業進用身心障礙員工對企業價值、市場績效及財務績效指標之攸關性 國立中央大學]. 臺灣碩士論文知識加值系統. 桃園縣. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6campb
彭愛茹. (2008). 身心障礙者之雇用與管理探討--以製造業為例 國立中央大學]. 臺灣碩士論文知識加值系統. 桃園縣. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/uhrx4s
游鴻智. (1999). 公務人員退休再就業之探討—以台北市政府為例. In: 國立台北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士論文.
黃能堂和邱麗家. (2015). 在高齡社會結構下人力資源運用之研究: 以某連鎖速食店為例. 中華國際管理評論國際學報,18(2),1-22。
鄧美玲. (2021). 公司女力比與企業經營績效關聯性之研究 國立中正大學]. 臺灣碩士論文知識加值系統. 嘉義縣. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/k4m2cx
賴偉傑. (2010). 女性董事、公司治理與財務績效─以台灣上市公司為例 國立臺北大學]. 臺灣碩士論文知識加值系統. 新北市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/zbm466
戴皖珍. (2019). 女性管理者對公司績效之影響-以臺灣上市櫃公司為例 國立臺灣師範大學]. 臺灣碩士論文知識加值系統. 台北市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/256zk9
謝函臻. (2021). 性別多樣性與公司績效-家族企業的調節作用 國立臺灣師範大學]. 臺灣碩士論文知識加值系統. 台北市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2xe48g
關婉珍. (2000). 支持策略在支持性就業中之應用情形與成效分析 國立高雄師範大學]. 臺灣碩士論文知識加值系統. 高雄市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ypnfbx
蘇俞真. (2020). 職場性別平等與企業績效 國立中央大學]. 臺灣碩士論文知識加值系統. 桃園縣. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/437k8h
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). Elsevier.
Blau, T. H. (1977). Quality of life, social indicators, and criteria of change. Professional Psychology, 8(4), 464.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
Chu, W. (2011). Family ownership and firm performance: Influence of family management, family control, and firm size. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28, 833-851.
Dychtwald, K., & Kadlec, D. J. (2010). A new purpose: Redefining money, family, work, retirement, and success. Harper Collins.
Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: The effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1-2), 85-106.
Francoeur, C., Labelle, R., & Sinclair-Desgagné, B. (2008). Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. Journal of business ethics, 81, 83-95.
Gallego-Álvarez, I., García-Sánchez, I. M., & Rodríguez-Dominguez, L. (2010). The influence of gender diversity on corporate performance: La influencia de la diversidad de género en el rendimiento empresarial. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 13(1), 53-88.
Hermalin, B., & Weisbach, M. S. (2001). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature.
Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., & Cannella Jr, A. A. (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of management journal, 50(4), 941-952.
Jing, J., Feng, X., Song, J., & Li, B. (2022). Does the inclusion of disabled employees affect firm performance? empirical evidence from china. Sustainability, 14(13), 7835.
Kalargyrou, V., & Volis, A. A. (2014). Disability inclusion initiatives in the hospitality industry: An exploratory study of industry leaders. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 13(4), 430-454.
Levi, M., Li, K., & Zhang, F. (2014). Director gender and mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 185-200.
Li, H., & Chen, P. (2018). Board gender diversity and firm performance: The moderating role of firm size. Business Ethics: A European Review, 27(4), 294-308.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial
performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic management journal, 21(5), 603-609.
Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of financial economics, 13(2), 187-221.
Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2009). How broadly does education contribute to job performance? Personnel psychology, 62(1), 89-134.
Oware, K. M., & Mallikarjunappa, T. (2021). Disability employment and financial performance: the effect of technological innovation of listed firms in India. Social Responsibility Journal, 17(3), 384-398. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2019-0299
Shaw, J. D., Delery, J. E., Jenkins Jr, G. D., & Gupta, N. (1998). An organization-level analysis of voluntary and involuntary turnover. Academy of management journal, 41(5), 511-525.
Triana, M. d. C., Miller, T. L., & Trzebiatowski, T. M. (2014). The double-edged nature of board gender diversity: Diversity, firm performance, and the power of women directors as predictors of strategic change. Organization Science, 25(2), 609-632.