簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳瑋光
Wu Wei Kuang
論文名稱: 國小實習教師體育科教學計畫之研究
Study on PE instructional planning process of pre-service teacher in elementary school
指導教授: 闕月清
Keh, Nyit-Chin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 體育學系
Department of Physical Education
論文出版年: 2004
畢業學年度: 92
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 108
中文關鍵詞: 體育教學計畫計畫歷程實習教師
英文關鍵詞: PE instructional planning, process of planning, Pre-service teacher
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:137下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討國小實習教師對體育科教學計畫的認知、體育科教學計畫的歷程與內容、影響其進行體育科教學計畫的因素,以及對教學計畫實施時的反應及因應之道。本研究對象為二位國小實習教師,以及該二位教師實習之五年級班級。研究方法採參與觀察、半結構與非結構訪談、刺激回憶訪談、文件分析等方式進行資料蒐集,並以持續比較法分析所蒐集之文字資料。研究結果如下:兩位實習教師擬定教學計畫的形式是以內心式教學計畫為主、書面式為輔。兩位實習教師對教學計畫抱持肯定的態度,認為有助於教學目標的擬定與教學時活動流程的順暢。其教學時考慮的重點是以教學目標為優先考量。兩位實習教師均認為對學生起點能力認識的不足是其所遇到最大的困擾,至於解決的方式,是課前預測班級學生起點行為,並在實際上課時藉由觀察以瞭解班級學生的實際程度。至於影響實習教師的教學計畫有幾大項因素:教師自身因素、班級學生因素以及學校環境以及其他因素。本研究結果可供師資培育機構、學校體育教師與體育相關研究人員,在體育課程設計、教學與學術研究之參考。

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the PE instructional planning process of pre-service teacher in elementary school. The participants included two elementary pre-service teachers and their two classes of fifth-grade students. Qualitative method was used to collect data through participant observation field notes, interviews and stimulated recall. Data were analyzed with constant comparison method. Results showed that the pre-service teachers mainly used to make mental planning, and text planning was used as auxiliary. Both pre- service teachers agreed on the importance of instructional planning, which helped them making teaching goal and smoothening the instructional process. Their first consideration of planning was their teaching goal of the class. Both of the pre-service teachers considered that knowing students’ entering behaviors confuse them most when they tried to make instructional plans, and they tried to solve the problems by predicting the students’ entering behaviors before the class and observing the students when teaching. The factors that affected their instructional planning making could be inducted from personal, student, and school factors. These findings have implications for teacher education, physical education teachers, and researchers.

    中文摘要-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ⅰ 英文摘要-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ⅱ 謝誌-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ⅲ 目次-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ⅳ 表次-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ⅶ 圖次-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ⅷ 第壹章 緒論----------------------------------------------------------------- 1 第一節 研究背景-------------------------------------------------------- 2 第二節 研究目的與問題----------------------------------------------- 4 第三節 研究範圍與限制----------------------------------------------- 5 第四節 名詞解釋-------------------------------------------------------- 7 第貳章 文獻探討------------------------------------------------------------ 8 第一節 教學計畫之定義----------------------------------------------- 8 第二節 教學計畫之功能與理論基礎-------------------------------- 12 第三節 教學計畫的形式與模式-------------------------------------- 19 第四節 影響教學計畫的因素----------------------------------------- 23 第五節 教學計畫與教學之關係-------------------------------------- 27 第六節 教學計畫之相關研究----------------------------------------- 29 第參章 研究方法與步驟------------------------------------------------ 39 第一節 研究架構-------------------------------------------------------- 39 第二節 研究參與者----------------------------------------------------- 40 第三節 研究方法與研究工具----------------------------------------- 41 第四節 實施過程-------------------------------------------------------- 44 第五節 資料處理-------------------------------------------------------- 47 第肆章 研究結果與討論------------------------------------------------ 51 第一節 實習教師對教學計畫的認知-------------------------------- 51 第二節 教學計畫歷程、困擾與解決方法-------------------------- 60 第三節 影響實習教師進行教學計畫的因素----------------------- 65 第四節 教學計畫與教學活動的差異-------------------------------- 77 第伍章 結論與建議--------------------------------------------------- 81 第一節 結論-------------------------------------------------------------- 81 第二節 建議-------------------------------------------------------------- 82 參考文獻------------------------------------------------------------------------ 85 一、中文部分---------------------------------------------------------------- 85 二、英文部分---------------------------------------------------------------- 88 附錄------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 92 附錄一 參與教師同意書----------------------------------------------- 92 附錄二 教學前訪談問題大綱 ---------------------------------------- 93 附錄三 教學後訪談問題大綱----------------------------------------- 94 附錄四 訪談逐字稿舉隅-李老師----------------------------------- 95 附錄五 訪談逐字稿舉隅-許老師----------------------------------- 99 附錄六 教學計畫舉隅-------------------------------------------------- 102 附錄七 教學計畫舉隅-------------------------------------------------- 104 附錄八 訪談與觀察時間表-------------------------------------------- 106 附錄九 參與觀察記錄示例-------------------------------------------- 107 附錄十 非正式訪談示例----------------------------------------------- 108

    一、中文部分
    方炳林。(民65)。普通教學法。台北:教育文物出版社。
    王建台。(民89)。文獻分析法。載於國立台灣師範大學體育發展中心主編,學校體育教學研究方法。台北市:教育部。
    王美晴。(民84)。資深與新進幼兒教師教學計畫歷程之研究。文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    王敏秀。(民91)。健康與體育學習領域教師實施協同教學之研究。國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    沈桂枝。(民84)。國民小學教師體育教學決定影響因素之研究。國立臺北師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    李勝雄。(民87)。體育課程設計。載於許義雄(等著),運動教育與人文關懷(下)─課程與教學篇(49-71頁)。台北:師大書苑。
    沈翠蓮。(民86)。國中實習教師與有經驗教師教學計畫信念與實務之研究。教育學刊, 13, 241-261。
    吳瑋光、闕月清。(民91)。教師思考相關文獻回顧。中華民國大專院校九十一年度體育學術研討會專刊,31-39。
    吳瑋光、闕月清。(民92)。國小實習教師教學計畫個案研究。中華民國大專院校九十二年度體育學術研討會專刊,262-270。
    林進材。(民86)。教師教學思考-理論、研究與應用。高雄:復文出版社。
    林彩鳳。(民82)。淺談教師思考。南投文教,5卷一期,25-28。
    林寶山。(民79)。教學論-理論與方法。台北:五南出版社。
    夏淑琴。(民88)。體育專家教師與生手教師之比較研究-以教師回饋為例。國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    高熏芳、林盈助、王向葵譯。(民90)。質化研究設計:一種互動取向的方法(J.A.Maxwell原著, 1996年出版)。台北:心理。
    張俊紳。(民83)。教學計畫的擬訂與技術。國教之聲,27卷,49-55。
    張春秀。(民89)。體育教學情境中的學生思考研究-以五專生羽反手發短球教學為例。台北:師大書苑。
    張春興。(民84)。教育心理學。台北:東華書局。
    教育部。(民86)。學校體育教材教法與評量(四)羽球。台北:教育部。
    教育部。(民86)。學校體育教材教法與評量(十三)排球。台北:教育部。
    許義雄譯。(民86)。兒童發展與身體教育(Gallahue, D. L.原著, 1996年出版)。 台北市:國立編譯館。
    許義雄、黃月嬋譯。(民90)。體育教學策略 ( J. Rink原著, 1999年出版)。 台北市:藝軒。
    曾一平。(民87)。理化實習教師教學計劃認知與思考之研究。彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    曾文科。(民82)。如何研究教學計畫。竹北學粹,1卷,95-139。
    黃光雄。(民79)。教學原理。高雄:復文出版社。
    黃炳煌。(民76)。從教學的概念分析談教學設計。載於國立台灣師範大學教育學系主編,教學研究專輯。台北:南宏圖書。
    黃瑞琴。(民85)。質的教育研究法。台北:心理。
    黃政傑、楊龍立。(民80)。課程設計。台北:東華。
    葉憲清。(民75)。大專興趣分組體育課教學行政與研究。台北:偉文出版社。
    蔡易峻。(民90)。專家與生手體育教師教學行為之比較。國立體育學院體育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    謝瑩慧。(民84)。教師計畫研究對幼教課程計畫與實施的啟示。國立台中師範學院幼兒教育年刊,八期,57-75。
    簡紅珠。(民81)。教學研究的主要派典及其啟示之探析。高雄:復文出版社。
    二、英文部分
    Adams, P. E., & Krockver, G. H. (1997). Beginning science teacher cognition and its origins in the preservice secondary science teacher program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 633-653.
    Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology:A cognitive view. New York:Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    Berliner, D. C. (1988) The development of expertise in pedagogy. New Orleans: American Association of College for Teacher Education.
    Brown, D. (1988). Twelve middle-school teachers’planning. The Elementary School Journal, 89, 67-87.
    Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. New York:Norton.
    Byra, M. & Coulon, S. C. (1994). The Effect of Planning on the Instructional Behaviors of Preservice Teachers. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 13, 123-139.
    Clark, C. M. (1980). Choice of a model for research on teacher thinking. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 12(1), 41-47.
    Clark, C. M. & Elmore, J. L. (1981). Transforming curriculum in mathematics, science, and writing: A case study of teacher yearly planning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 205 500)
    Clark, C. M. & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought process. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed). Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255-296). New York: Macmillan.
    Clark, C. M. & Yinger, R. J. (1979). Three studies of teacher planning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
    Clark, C. M. & Yinger, R. J. (1980). The hidden world of teaching: implications of research on teacher planning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED191 844)
    Daniel, D. & Rogers, M. (2000) Pre-service primary Teachers’ planning for Science and Technology Activities: Influences and Constraints. Research in Science and Technological Educator, 18, 215-225.
    Driscoll, M. P., Kleinm, J. D., & Sherman, G. P. (1994). Perspectives on instructional planning : How do teachers and instructional designers conceive of ISD planning practices. Educational Technology, 34, 34-42.
    Geddis, A. N. (1993). Transforming subject-matter knowledge: The role of pedagogical content knowledge in learning to reflect on teaching, International Journal of Science Education, 15, 673-683.
    Gess-Newsome, J. & Lederman, N. G. (1991). Metamorphosis, adaptation, or evolution? Preservice science teachers’ concerns and perceptions of teaching and planning. Science Education, 75, 443-456.
    Glatthorn, A. A. (1993). Teacher planning:A foundation for effective instruction. Nassp Bulletin, 77, 1-7.
    Goc-Karp, G. & Zakrajsek, D. B. (1987). Planning for Learning--Theory Into Practice. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 6(4), 377-392.
    Gold, R. L. (1958). Roles in sociological field observations. Social Forces, 36, 217-223.
    Housner, L., & Griffey, D. C. (1985). Teacher cognition:Differences in planning and interactive decision making between experienced and inexperienced teachers. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 56, 45-53.
    Imwold, C. H., Rider, R. A., Twardy, B. M., Oliver, P. S., Griffin, M., & Arsenault, D. N. (1984). The effect of planning on the teaching behavior of preservice physical education teachers. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 4, 50-56.
    Mahaz, M. (1994). An experienced teacher’s model of thinking and teaching : An ethnographic study on teacher cognition, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
    McCutcheon, G. (1980). How do elementary school teacher plan? The nature of planning and influence on it. Elementary School Journal, 81, 4-23.
    McLeod, M. A. (1981). The identification of intended learning outcomes by early childhood teachers: An exploratory study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
    Metzler, M., & Young, J. C. (1984). The relationship between teachers’ preactive planning and student process measures. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sports, 55,356-364.
    Morine-Dershimer, G. (1979). Planning and classroom reality:An indepth look. Educational Research Quarterly, 3, 83-99.
    Peterson, P. L., Marx, R. W., & Clark, C. M. (1978). Teacher planning, teacher behavior, and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 15, 417-432.
    Reiser, R. A. (1994). Examining the planning practices of teachers: Reflections on three years of research. Educational technology, 34, 11-16.
    Roskos, K. (1996). When Two Heads Are Better Than One: Beginning Teachers’ Planning Processes in an Integrated Instruction Planning Task. Journal of Teacher Education, 47, 120-129.
    Rust, F. O. (1994). The first year of teaching: It's not what they expected. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10, 205-217.
    Shavelson, R. J. & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers' pedagogical judgment of beginning science teachers. Science Education, 72, 615-624.
    Teresa, J. & Grant, M. (1996) Preservice Teacher planning. A study of the Journey from Learner to Teacher in Mathematics and Social Studies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 207-221.
    Taylor, P. H. (1970). How teacher plan their course. Slough, England: National Foundation for Education Research.
    Tyler, R. W. (1950). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago University Press.
    Weinstein, C. S. (1989). Teacher education students’ preconceptions of teaching Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 53-60.
    Wolcott, L. L. (1994). Understanding How Teachers Plan: Strategies for Successful Instructional Partnerships. School Library Media Quarterly, 22 (3), 161-164.
    Yinger, R. J. (1977). A study of teacher planning:Description and a model of preactive decision making. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, Ontario.
    Yinger, R. J. (1979). Routines in teacher planning. Theory into Practice. 18(3), 163-169.
    Yinger, R. J. (1980). A study of teacher planning. The Elementary School Journal, 80, 107-127.
    Zahorik, J. A. (1970). The effects of teacher planning on teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 71, 143-151.
    Zahorik, J. A. (1975). Teachers’ planning model. Education Leadership, 33, 134-139.

    QR CODE