壹、中文部分
2014專業英文詞彙能力大賽（2015年2月）。最新消息：2014專業英文詞彙能力大賽全國好手齊聚師大夢想發光。取自https://sites.google.com/site/2014gladworldhome/news/2014zhuanyeyingwencihuinenglidasaiquanguohaoshouqijushidamengxiangfaguang
2019專業英文詞彙能力大賽（2020年7月）。最新消息：第八屆專業英（日）文2019總決賽之各科目平均成績。取自https://sites.google.com/site/gladworldcontest/new?offset=0
CHT_PVQC.php。
王文科（2001）。教育研究法（六版）。臺北市：五南。
王令宜、高熏芳（2004）。國民小學推廣行動學習之關切階層研究，教育研究月刊，246，73-94。
王振鴻（2000）。國小教師對九年一貫課程之變革因素及其影響因素研究。（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學教育學系，臺北市。
全球學習與測評發展中心網站（2014年7月）。關於專業英文詞彙能力國際認證。取自http://www2.gladworld.net/gladworldtest/
余泰魁（2007）。科技媒介學習環境之學習成效比較研究。教育心理學報，39（1），69-90。
吳萬益（2008）。企業研究方法（第3版）。臺北市：華泰文化。
吳鴻春（2009）。國民中小學教科書數位學習系統多準則評估模式之建構（未出版之碩士論文）。開南大學，桃園市。
李隆盛（2008）。向企業學習:克伯屈的四層次評鑑。評鑑雙月刊，13，45-48.
周碩貴（2005）。技職校院英語教學之困境與突破。教育研究月刊，138，86-94。
林尤美（2007）。專業英文（ESP）：公眾演說與英語簡報。教育暨外國語文學報，5，92-113。
林志隆、王郁文（2006）。以南區國小初級資訊種子教師創新接受度資訊科技融入教學關注之相關研究。屏東教育大學學報，24，107-145。
林信志、湯凱雯、賴信志（2010）。以科技接受模式探討大學生學習以網路教學系統製作數位教材之意圖和成效。數位學習科技，2（1），60-78。
林敏芳（2005）。線上評量應用於教學上的現狀與發展。生活科技教育月刊，38（1），74-85。
林菁、鍾如雅（2009）。大學教師對網路教學的關注與使用階層之個案研究。數位與開放學習期刊，2，1-35。
林煌凱（2002）。國中教師教學創新接受度與資訊科技融入教學關注階層之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
林碧珍、蔡文煥（2007）。小學數學領域輔導教師培訓課程及其實施成效。科學教育學刊，15（5），521-542
邱皓政（2006）。量化研究與統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北市：五南。
邱慧玲（2002）。國小教師對九年一貫課程的關注階層與使用之研究（未出版之碩士論文）國立臺中師範學院，臺中市
邱錦昌（2008）。教育視導與學校效能。臺北市：高等教育文化。
姜禮能（2002）。國小教師對於資訊融入教學之變革關注與相關因素研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立花蓮師範學院，花蓮縣。
洪榮昭（2001）。PBL教學策略。技術及職業教育雙月刊，61，10-12。
袁宇熙（2013年10月）。技職再造方案之內涵。元培科技大學教與學電子報，101（6）。取自http://ctl.ypu.edu.tw/files/16-1052-30800.php
張世忠（2000）。教學原理─統整與應用。臺北市：五南圖書。
張玉櫻（2008）。談專業英語與高等教育。專業英文教學特輯，28，28-29。
張春興、林清山（1991）。教育心理學。臺北： 東華。
張迺貞、周天（2015）。運用Kirkpatrick模式評估資訊法律課程在數位學習環境之學習成效。教育資料與圖書館學，52（4），417-450。
張國保、袁宇熙、林清南、李寶琳（2013）。105學年度職業學校課程綱要調整暨技職校院縱向課程研發機制之計畫-子計畫二：產學課程銜接機制建立期中報告。臺北市：教育部。
張新仁（2001）。當代教學統整新趨勢：建構多元而適配的整體學習環境。教育學刊，18，43-64。
張瓊方（2017年9月）。加強職場專業英文打造藍海競爭力。2018研究所指南雜誌。取自：https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/40043
教育部（2010）。推動技職教育再造方案-培育優質專業人力。臺北市：教育部。
莊世杰、楊仁壽、黃俊祥（2002）。受訓動機與訓練評量三個層次之關係研究。管理評論，21（2），81-102。
許譽勝（2004）。臺灣中小型軟體公司關鍵成功因素之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。銘傳大學，桃園市。
郭生玉（1999）。心理與教育測驗（十三版）。台北：精華。
陳玉婷（2008）。影響網路學習成效之相關研究-以南部某科技大學為例。中臺學報，20（2），67-87。
陳李綢（1983）。大專男女生自我統整程度與職業選擇、學習漏意度及交母養育方式之比較研究。教育心理學報，16，89-98。
陳淑蘭（2011）。新北市新移民與非新移民子女國小高年級學生學習態度與學習成效之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學課程與教學研究所，臺北市。
陳清檳，黃文喜，張文宗（2010）。高職電機電子群學生父母管教方式、學習態度與學習成效知覺之研究。教育與多元文化研究期刊，2，223-260。
彭森明、蔡小婷（2010）。美國公立研究型大學學生學習成效評估計畫之實施。評鑑雙月刊，27，14-17。
曾瑞譙（2009）。電腦輔助教學軟體使用後之效益分析－科技接受模式的觀點與應用。新竹教育大學學報，26（2），127-163。
游毓玲、陳柏年（2014）。被遺忘的高職英語文教學─談十二年國教下的高職英語文教學。中等教育，65（3），88-107。
黃玉（2000）。大學學生事務的理論基礎－臺灣大學生心理社會發展之研究。公民訓育學報，9，161-200。
黃光雄、簡茂發（2003）。教育研究法。臺北市：師大書苑。
黃佳純、謝慧賢（2011）。管理才能發展訓練方案成效評估-以公部門教育訓練機構為例。人力資源管理學報，11（3），1-26。
黃偉翔（2020年4月）。新北市技職雙語課程｜教職場用得到的英文，讓高職生更有感。親子天下雜誌，111，取自：https://www.parenting.com.tw/article/5085206-/。
詹秀雯、張芳全（2014）。影響國中生學習成就因素之研究。臺中教育大學學報：教育類，28（1），49-76。
劉亞平（1998）。教育改革的關心程度問卷與線上測驗之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺南師範學院，臺南市。
劉興郁、蔡瑞敏（2006年3月）。組織變革知覺、學習動機對學習成效之影響。2006工研院創新與科技管理研討會，逢甲大學。
薛雅明、徐玉瓊（2006）。影響案例式網路學習系統學習成效之研究。教育研究學報，40（1），173-194。
謝佩倫（2018）。高屏地區國小教師對翻轉教室之關注階層與創新接受度之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東大學資訊科學系，屏東縣。
鍾佩君（2017）。初探新版柯氏學習評估模式。評鑑雙月刊，68，34-38。
鍾明芬（2009）。影響學生學習成效關鍵成功因素之彙總分析（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。
鍾瑞瑛、高毓秀（2012）。專科護理師訓練課程成效評估之探討。護理暨健康照護研究，8（3），201-211。 
貳、外文部分
Adams, R. D., & Martray, C. (1981). Teacher Development: A study of factors related to teacher concerns for pre, beginning, and experienced teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles, CA.
Alexe, M. (2013). Developing Professional English Vocabulary Through Computer Based Simulted Situations. eLearning and Software for Education, 3, 249-254.
Alliger, G. M., & Janak, E. A. (1989). Kirkpatrick’s levels of training criteria: Thirty years later. Personnel Psychology, 42, 331-342.
Almaiah, M. A., & Alismaiel, O. A. (2019). Examination of factors influencing the use of mobile learning system: An empirical study. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 885-909.
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of educational psychology, 84(3), 261.
Anderson, S. E. (1997). Understanding teacher change: Revisiting the concerns based adoption model. Curriculum inquiry, 27(3), 331-367.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bates, R. (2004). A critical analysis of evaluation practice: the Kirkpatrick model and the principle of beneficence. Evaluation and program planning, 27(3), 341-347.
Cavus, N., & Ibrahim, D. (2009). M-learning: An experiment in using SMS to support learning new English language words. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 78-91.
Chan, S. C., Wan, C. J., & Ko, S. (2019). Interactivity, active collaborative learning, and learning performance: The moderating role of perceived fun by using personal response systems. The International Journal of Management Education, 17(1), 94-102.
Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
Chen, Y. H., & Jang, S. J. (2014). Interrelationship between stages of concern and technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge: A study on Taiwanese senior high school in-service teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 79-91.
Cheng, M. H. M., & Wan, Z. H. (2016). Unpacking the paradox of Chinese science learners: Insights from research into Asian Chinese school students’ attitudes towards learning science, science learning strategies, and scientific epistemological views. Studies in Science Education, 52(1), 29 - 62.
Dalkey, N. C. (1969). The Delpghi merhod: An experimental study of group opinion. CA: Rand Corporation.
Dashtizadeh, P. & Farvardin, M. T. (2016).The relationship between language learning motivation and foreign language achievement as mediated by perfectionism: the case of high school EFL learners. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 4(3), 86-102.
Delavari, S., Rezaee, R., Hatam, N., & Delavari, S. (2016). Technical efficiency of Shiraz school of medicine in research and education domains: a data envelopment analysis. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 4(1), 13.
Dixon, N. M. (1990). The relationship between trainee responses on participation reaction forms and posttest scores. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 1, 129-137
Dobrin, J. (1999). Who's teaching online. ITPE News, 2(12), 6-7.
Draper, S. W., & Brown, M. I. (2004). Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(2), 81-94
Fischer, C., McCoy, A., Foster, B., Eisenkraft, A., & Lawrenz, F. (2019). Use of the stages of concerns questionnaire in a national top-down reform effort. Teaching and Teacher Education, 80, 13-26.
Fletcher, P. & Collins, M. J. (1987). Computer- administered versus written test- advantages and disadvantage. Journal of Computer in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 6(2), 38-43.
Frye, A. W., & Hemmer, P. A. (2012). Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE guide no. 67. Medical teacher, 34(5), 288-299.
Fullan, M., (1985). Change processes and strategies at the local level. Elementary School Journal, 85(3), 391 - 421.
Fuller, F.F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 207-226.
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. New Jersey : John Wiley & Sons.
Ghaffari, R., Ranjbarzadeh, F. S., Azar, E. F., Hassanzadeh, S., Safaei, N., Golanbar, P., & Abbasi, E. (2013). The analysis of learning styles and their relationship to academic achievement in medical students of basic sciences program. Research and Development in Medical Education, 2(2), 73-76.
Gibbons, P. (2009). English learners, academic literacy, and thinking: Learning in the challenge zone. NH: Heinemann.
Greene, T., Marti, C.N., & McClenney, K. M. (2008). The effort-outcome gap: Differences for African-American and Hispanic community college students in student engagement and academic achievement. Manuscript submitted for publication.The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 513-539.
Hall, 0. E., & Hord, S.M. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. New York: State University of New York Press.
Hall, G. E. (1976). The study of individual teacher and professor concerns about innovations. Journal of Teacher Education, 27, 22 - 23.
Hall, G. E. (2013). Evaluating change processes: Assessing extent of implementation: Constructs, methods and implications. Journal of Educational Administration, 51, 264 - 289.
Hall, G. E., George, A. A., & Rutherford, W. L. (1977). Measuring stages of concern about the innovation: A manual for the use of the SoC Questionnaire. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. (ERIC No. ED147 342).
Hall, G. E., Wallace, R. C., & Dossett, W. A. (1973). A developmental conceptualization of the adoption process within educational institutions. Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin, The Research and Development Center for Teacher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 095 126).
Heydari, M. R., Taghva, F., Amini, M., & Delavari, S. (2019). Using Kirkpatrick’s model to measure the effect of a new teaching and learning methods workshop for health care staff. BMC research notes, 12(1), 388.
Hiltz, S. R. (1997). Impacts of college-level courses via asynchronous learning networks: Some preliminary results. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 1(2), 1-19.
Hogarth, A. (2009). Adopting blended learning for collaborative work in higher education. NY : Nova Science Publishers.
Holton, E. F. (1996). The flawed four‐level evaluation model. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 7(1), 5-21.
Hubalovsky, S., Hubalovska, M., & Musilek, M. (2019). Assessment of the influence of adaptive E-learning on learning effectiveness of primary school pupils. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 691-705.
ITU (2011). The World in 2011: ICT Facts and Figures. Switzerland: International Telecommunication Union.
Kauffman, D. F. (2004). Self-regulated learning in web-based environments: Instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategy use, metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Journal of educational computing research, 30(1-2), 139-161.
Kearsley, G., & Lynch, W. (1994). Educational leadership in the age of technology: The new skills. In G. Kearsley & W. Lynch (Eds.), Educational technology: Leadership perspectives (pp.5-17). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco. CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Kirkpatrick, J. (2014). The New World Kirkpatrick Model. Retrieved December 30, 2014, from http://www.kirkpatrickpartners.com/OurPhilosophy/TheNewWorldKirkpatrickModel/tabid/303/
La Duke, P. (2017). How to evaluate training: using the kirkpatrick model. Professional safety, 62(8), 20.
Law, K. M., Geng, S., & Li, T. (2019). Student enrollment, motivation and learning performance in a blended learning environment: The mediating effects of social, teaching, and cognitive presence. Computers & Education, 136, 1-12.
Law, K. M., Geng, S., & Li, T. (2019). Student enrollment, motivation and learning performance in a blended learning environment: The mediating effects of social, teaching, and cognitive presence. Computers & Education, 136, 1-12.
Lee, E. A. L., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2010). How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 55, 1424-1442。
Leidner, D. E., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (1995). The Use of Information Technology to Enhance Management School Education: A Theoretical View.MIS Quarterly, 19(3), 265-291.
Loucks-Horsley, S. (2005). The concern-based adoption model (CBAM): A model for change in individuals. Retrieved August 21, 2006, from http://www.nationalacademies.org/rise/back¬g4a.htm
Masarweh, M, A. (2019). Evaluating M-learning system adoption by faculty members in Saudi Arabia using concern based adoption model (CBAM) stages of concern. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning , 14(5), 153-164.
Mikheeva, N., Petrova, M., & Dvoryadkina, N. (2018, October). Development of Electronic Teaching and Methodical Complex for Professional English Language Training of Russian Cosmonauts. The International Conference on Applied Linguistics Issues (ALI 2018). Symposium conducted at the meeting of Eurasian Applied Linguistics Society. Turkey: Istanbul.
Mohammed Saad, A., & Mat, N. (2013). Evaluation of effectiveness of training and development: The Kirkpatrick model. Asian Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 2(11), 14-24.
Murry, J. W., & Hammoms, J. O. (1995). Delphi: A versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. The Review of Higher Education, 18(4), 423-436.
Na, L., & Miao, X. (2019, June). Research on English Teaching Reform in Higher Vocational Colleges from the Perspective of Vocational English Competence Cultivation. 3rd International Conference on Economics, Management Engineering and Education Technology (ICEMEET 2019), Symposium conducted at the meeting of Atlantis Press. China : Beijing.
Na, L., & Miao, X. (2019, June). Research on English Teaching Reform in Higher Vocational Colleges from the Perspective of Vocational English Competence Cultivation. 3rd International Conference on Economics, Management Engineering and Education Technology (ICEMEET 2019), Symposium conducted at the meeting of Atlantis Press. China : Beijing.
Ni, A. Y. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of classroom and online learning: Teaching research methods. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(2), 199-215.
Noe, R. A., & Schmitt, N. (1986). The influence of trainee attitudes on training effectiveness: Test of a model. Personnel Psychology, 39, 497-523.
Nurdiansyah, D. M. R., Asyid, S. A., & Parmawati, A. (2019). Using Color Coding to Improve Students' English Vocabulary Ability. Project Professional Journal of English Education, 2(3), 358-363.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2008). 21st century skills, education and competitiveness: A resource and policy guide. Tucson, AZ: Partnership for 21st Century Skills.
Pearman, C., & Chang, C. (2010). Scaffolding or distracting: CD-ROM storybooks and young readers. Techtrends, 54(4), 52 - 57.
Peng, H. Y., Chuang, P. Y., Hwang, G. J., Chu, H. C., Wu, T. T., & Huang, S. X. (2009). Ubiquitous performance-support system as mind tool: A case study of instructional decision making and learning assistant. Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 107 - 120.
Rezaee, R., & Moadeb, N. (2016). Team-based learning: a new approach toward improving education. Acta Med Iranica, 54(10), 678-82.
Rich, J. M. (1992). Innovations in education: Reformers and their critics. (6th Ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Rogan, J. M., & Grayson, D. J. (2003). Towards a theory of curriculum implementation with particular reference to science education in developing countries, International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1171 - 1204.
Rollnick M., Dlamini B. T., & Bradley J. (2015). Unawareness to Production, Dropout to Innovator—Primary Teachers' Understanding and Use of a Science, Technology and Society Approach to Science Teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 37, 1202 - 1224.
Salma, A., Fitria, D., Syafriandi, S.(2020). Structural Equation Modelling: The Affecting of Learning Attitude on Learning Achievement of Students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1554, 1-7.
Schunk, D. H. (1981). Modeling and attributional effects on children's achievement: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(1), 93-105.
Shaffer, D. M., & Collura, M. J. (2009). Evaluating the effectiveness of a personal response system in the classroom. Teaching of Psychology, 36(4), 273 - 277.
Shapiro, A. M., Sims-Knight, J., O'Rielly, G. V., Capaldo, P., Pedlow, T., Gordon, L., & Monteiro, K. (2017). Clickers can promote fact retention but impede conceptual understanding: The effect of the interaction between clicker use and pedagogy on learning. Computers & Education, 111, 44.
Shea, P., Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A. Pelz, W. & Swan, K.(2001). Measures of learning effectiveness in the SUNY Learning Network. In J. Bourne & J. Moore (Chair), Sloan Summer Workshop on Asynchronous Learning Networks. Symposium conducted at the meeting of Sloan-C Press, Massachusetts.
Shelton, S., & Alliger, G. M. (1993). Who’s afraid of level 4 evaluation? A practical approach. Training and Development Journal, 47, 43-46.
Sun, Z., & Xie, K. (2020). How do students prepare in the pre-class setting of a flipped undergraduate math course? A latent profile analysis of learning behavior and the impact of achievement goals. The Internet and Higher Education, 46, 100731.
Sung, H. Y., Hwang, G. J., & Chen, S. F. (2019). Effects of embedding a problem-posing-based learning guiding strategy into interactive e-books on students’ learning performance and higher order thinking tendency. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(3), 389-401.
Trapani, B., & Annunziato, A. (2019). Crossing the Bridge of Change: Measuring Instructional Change Using the Concerns Based Adoption Model. Journal for Leadership and Instruction, 18(1), 12-16.
Trapani, B., & Annunziato, A. (2019). Crossing the Bridge of Change: Measuring Instructional Change Using the Concerns Based Adoption Model. Journal for Leadership and Instruction, 18(1), 12-16.
Tunks, J., & Weller, K. (2009). Changing practice, changing minds, from arithmetical to algebraic thinking: an application of the concerns-based adoption model (CBAM). Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(2), 161.
Vaughan, W. (2002). Professional development and the adoption and implementation of new innovations: Do teacher concerns matter? International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 6(5). Retrieved December 5, 2014, from http://www.ucalgary.ca/iejll/vaughan.
Wang, T. H. (2011). Developing Web-based assessment strategies for facilitating junior high school students to perform self-regulated learning in an e-Learning environment. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1801-1812.
Wang, T. H. (2014). Developing an assessment-centered e-Learning system for improving student learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 73, 189-203.
Warr, P., & Bunce, D. (1995). Trainee characteristics and the outcomes of open learning. Personnel Psychology, 48, 347-375.
Yang, Q. F., Chang, S. C., Hwang, G. J., & Zou, D. (2020). Balancing cognitive complexity and gaming level: Effects of a cognitive complexity-based competition game on EFL students' English vocabulary learning performance, anxiety and behaviors. Computers & Education, 148, 103808.