簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 王釗文
Wang,Chao-Wen
論文名稱: 單親家庭成年子女手足關係之互動情形及其互動意義之建構
The Construction of The Interaction And The Meaning of Adult Sibling Relationship in Single – Parent Families
指導教授: 張景媛
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2001
畢業學年度: 89
語文別: 中文
中文關鍵詞: 單親家庭手足關係互動意義
英文關鍵詞: single-parent family, sibling relationship, interaction, meaning
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:305下載:85
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 中 文 摘 要
    本研究以敘說研究之取向探討單親家庭子女的手足關係之互動情形及其互動對個人產生的意義。
    本研究所邀請四位研究參與者在成年之前,其家庭因故由雙親家庭轉變為單親家庭,而目前他們已成年,年齡在廿一至廿八歲之間。在研究方法上,研究者以非結構方式與參與者進行晤談後,將訪談內容整理成逐字稿,參照紮根理論所提供的編碼技術,運用「Nud*ist 4.0」分析軟體,分析手足關係中的互動情形,再分別將四位受訪者的手足關係發展說成故事,並進行意義的詮釋。
    從四位參與者的手足關係中,本研究建構出「手足是親近而強健的」、「手足是親近而危弱的」、「手足是疏遠而強健的」、「手足是疏遠而危弱的」等四種行為脈絡以及「交流」、「照應」、「聯盟」、「授權」、「對立」、「區隔」、「補缺」等七種互動行為,並以此進行討論。而將不同的行為脈絡串聯起來後,本研究對四位參與者的手足關係做多重的詮釋,以「手足關係是一種歸屬」、「手足關係有其疏離的層面」、「手足關係事件構自我的場域」、「手足關係是拓展視域的網絡」表之。
    最後,研究者對研究進行反思,並提出建議,以供單親家庭成員、心理輔導工作者以及未來研究方向上的參考。

    This research is aimed to the discussion of the sibling interaction in single-parent family and the personal significance of this interaction using narrative approach.
    The four participants in this research are all from families that turned single-parent before they reached their adulthood. They are all in their adult hood now and age between 21 to 28 years old. The researcher interviewed with the participants using a non-structure approach. Each interview is rearranged into written form afterward. By applying the coding technology of the grounded theory, the researcher first analyses the interaction between siblings using software Nud*ist 4.0. Then the sibling relationship of the four participants is described as a story and commented explanatorily.
    The researcher concludes from the sibling relationship of the four participants with four types of action contexts and seven types of interaction. The four action contexts are: siblings are accessible and strong; siblings are accessible and weak; siblings are inaccessible and strong; and siblings are inaccessible and weak. The seven types of interaction are: exchanging, care taking, allied, empowered, contradictory, distinguishing and complementary. After connecting different action contexts, the researcher interprets the sibling relationship of the four participants as: sibling relationship is a kind of belonging; sibling relationship has its own inaccessible aspects; sibling relationship is a field in which one can construct self; and sibling relationship can be a network that broadens one’s views.
    To conclude the research, the researcher reflects on the research and gives suggestions that may be helpful for members of single-parent families, consolers and future researchers.

    目 錄 第一章 前言 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究問題 4 第三節 名詞定義 4 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 單親家庭相關研究 5 第二節 手足關係相關研究 9 第三節 關係的敘事研究取向 21 第三章 研究方法 29 第一節 研究對象 29 第二節 研究工具 29 第三節 資料收集方法 30 第四節 資料分析方法 31 第四章 研究結果 36 第一節 單親手足的行動脈絡之分析 36 第二節 單親手足關係之敘事觀點的詮釋 60 第五章 討論 95 第一節 單親手足的互動行為 95 第二節 單親手足關係的意義 102 第三節 對研究的反思 114 第六章 結論與建議 119 第一節 結論 119 第二節 建議 121 附錄 一 開放編碼階段所產生之類別一覽表 136 附錄 二 主軸譯碼階段所產生之類別一覽表 139 附錄 三 四位受訪者對手足關係互動意義之敘說 141 表 一 單親家庭之結構式治療研究摘要……………………………13 表 二 受訪者資料一覽表……………………………………………....35 表 三 「性質」與「假設性關係」的矩陣…………………….………38 表 四 手足的「可得性」與「情勢」之矩陣………………………….40 表 五 手足關係的意義在各脈絡下分布的情形……………….……..41 表 六 受訪者看待手足及所採取行動之方式…………….…………..44 圖 一 手足關係因果模式圖(Furman, 1993)…………………….……..22 圖 二 手足關係的四種行動脈絡……………………………………...43 圖 三 培根的手足故事發展簡圖……………………………………..67 圖 四 BoBo的手足故事發展簡圖……………………………………74 圖 五 小雯的手足故事發展簡圖……………………………………..83 圖 六 Wincent的手足故事發展簡圖…………………………………..96 圖 七 親子依附系統簡圖(Hazan & Shaver,1994)………………………102 圖 八 本研究中單親手足行動簡圖……………………………………103

    余巧芸(民87):少年犯罪矯治機構兒童、青少年的手足關係之紀要 – 以彰化少年撫育院為對象。輔仁學誌,28,87 – 118。
    沈松清(民85):在主體哲學的廢墟中重估自我 – 呂格爾的自我詮釋學評述。哲學雜誌,15,4 – 43。
    柯淑敏(民83):分手經驗的個人意義:一種故事的觀點。輔仁大學應用心理研究所碩士論文。
    翁開誠(民86):同理心開展的再出發。輔仁學誌-文學院之部,26,261 - 274。
    張清富、薛承泰、周清月、曹雅玲、陳敏雪(民86):單親家庭現況即因應策略之探討。行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究報告。
    黃富源、鄧煌發(民87):單親家庭與少年非行之探討。警學叢刊,29(3),117-152。
    鄔佩麗(民87):從失落經驗看單親家庭因應策略之研究。
    Ainsworth, M.D.S. (1994). Attachments and other affectional bonds across the life cycle. In C.M. Parkes, J. Stevenson-Hinde & P. Marris (Eds.), Attachment across the life cycle (pp33-51). London & New York: Tavistock/Routledge.
    Bank, S.P. & Kahn, M.D.(1982). Intense sibling loyalties. In M. Lamb & B. Sutton-smith (Eds.), Sibling relationships: Their nature and significance across the life span (pp. 251-267). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Bank, S.P.(1991). Remembering and reinterpreting sibling bonds. In F. Boer & J. Dunn(Eds.), Children’s sibling relationships: Development and clinical issues (pp139-147). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Best,S. & Kellner,D.(1994). Postmodern theory: Critical interrogation(朱元鴻等譯(民83):後現代理論-批判的質疑。台北:巨流)
    Bochner, A.P., Ellis,C. & Tillmann-Healy, L.M.(1997). Relationship as stories. In S. Duck (eds), Handbook of personal relationships (pp307 - 324). John Wiley & Sons.
    Bowlby, J.(1979).The making and breaking of affectional bonds. London: Tavistock.
    Bruner, J.(1986).Actual minds/possible worlds.Cambrige : Harard University Press.
    Bryant, B. K.(1992). Sibling caretaking: Providing emotional support during middle childhood. In F. Boer &J. Dunn(Eds.), Children’s sibling relationships: Developmental and clinical issues (pp.55 - 71). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Buhrmester,D.(1992). The developmental courses of sibling and peer relationships. In F. Boer &J. Dunn (Eds.), Children’s sibling relationships: Developmental and clinical issues(pp.19-40). Hillsdale,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Carlson, C.I.(1992). Single-parent families. In Procidano, M.E. & Fisher, C.B.(eds). Contemporary families: A handbook for school professionals,36-56. New York:Teachers College Peers.
    Cicirelli, V.G. (1994). Sibling relationships in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of marriage &the family, 56(1), 7 - 14.
    Cicirelli,V.G.(1993).The longest bond: The sibling life cycle. In L.L’Abate (Ed.), Handbook of family developmental psychology and psychpathology, ( pp44 - 59). New York : Wiley.
    Conger, R.D. & Conger K.J.(1996). Sibling relationships. In Understanding differences between divorced and intact families :stress, interaction, and child outcome(pp104 - 121).
    Denzin, N.K. (1989). Interpretive interactionism.(張君玫譯(民88)。解釋性互動論。台北:宏智)
    Dunn, J.(1984). Sibling studies and the developmental impact of critical incidents. In P. B. Baltes & O.G.Brim(Eds).Life span development and behavior(Vol.6,pp335 - 355). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
    Feeney,J. & Noller,P. (1996). Adult attachment. London : sage.
    Freedman, J. & Combs, G. (1999). Narrative therapy: the socia; construction of preferred realities. (易之新譯(民89)。敘事治療:解構並重寫生命故事。台北:張老師)
    Furman, W.C.(1993). Contemporary themes in research on sibling relationships of nondisabled children. In Z. Stoneman & P.W. Berman(Eds.), The effects of mental retardation, Disability, and illness on sibling relationships: Research and challenges. Paul H. Brookes.
    Goetting, A. (1986). The developmental tasks of siblingship over the life cycle. Journal of marriage and the family, 48,703-714.
    Hall,L.A., Gurley,D., Sachs,B & Kryscio,R.J. (1991). Psychosocial predictors of maternal depressive symptoms, parenting attitudes, and child behavior in single parent families. Nursing research, 40(4), 214 – 220.
    Heinicke, C.M. & Westheimer, I.(1965). Brief seperation. New York:Academic Press.
    Jenkins, J.(1992). Sibling relationships in disharmonious homes: Potential difficulties and protective effects. In F. Boer &J. Dunn(Eds.), Children’s sibling relationships: Developmental and clinical issues (pp.128 - 139). Hillsdale,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Kempton,T., Armistesd,L., Wierson,M. & Forehand,R. (1991). Presence of a sibling as a potential buffer following parental divorce:An examination of young adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 20(4), 434 - 438.
    Korittko, A.(1991). Family therapy with one-parent families. Contemporary family therapy,13(6),625-640.
    Lamb,M.E.(1982). Sibling relationships across the life span: An overview and introduction. In M. Lamb & B. Sutton-smith(Eds.),sibling relationships: Their nature and significance across the life span (pp.1 - 11). Hillsdale,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Mednick,M.T.(1989). Single mother: A review and critique of current research. In Skolnick & Skolnick(Eds). Family transition(6th ed)(pp.441-456).
    Pepper,S.C.(1942).World hypothses: A study in evidence. Berkeley:University of California Press.
    Ranieri,R. & Pratt,T. ( 1978). Sibling therapy. Social Work, 23, 418-419.
    Rosner,S.(1985). On the place of sibling in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic review,72(3), 459 - 477.
    Sarbin,T.R.(1986).Narrative psychology: The stories narrative of human conduct.New York: Prager.
    Schibuk, M.(1989). Treating the sibling subsystem: An adjunct of divorce therapy. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 59, 226 - 237.
    Stoneman,Z. & Brody,G.H. (1993). Sibling Relations in the family context. In Z. Stoneman & P.W. Berman(Eds.), The effects of mental retardation, Disability, and illness on sibling relationships: Research and challenges. Paul H. Brookes.
    Storr,A.(1995).Solitude: a return to the self.(張嚶嚶譯(民88)。孤獨。台北:知英)
    Strauss, A. & Corbin, J.(1990). Basic of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.(徐宗國譯(民86):質性研究概論。台北:巨流)
    Viney,L.L. & Bousfield,L. (1991). Narrative analysis: A method of psychosocial research for AIDS-affected people. Soc. Sci. Med.32(17),757-765.
    Westcot, M.E. & Dries, R(1990). Has family therapy adapted to the single - parent family? The American journal of family therapy,18(4),363 - 372.

    QR CODE