簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 王昭湄
Chao-mei Wang
論文名稱: 以兒童文學為起點結合全語言與環境教育之行動研究
Integrating Whole Language and Environmental Education thruogh Children's Literature at Early Elementary School Teaching : An Action Reasearch
指導教授: 周儒
Chou, Ju
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 環境教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Environmental Education
論文出版年: 2001
畢業學年度: 89
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 241
中文關鍵詞: 兒童文學全語言環境教育
英文關鍵詞: children's literature, whole language, environmental education
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:298下載:130
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 「全語言」努力拉近學校語言與生活語言的距離,在教學上強調真實、完整、與學習者的生活相關,這與「環境教育」近年來走向「運用生活周遭的環境,作為課程統整與學習的工具」之趨勢不謀而合。本研究除透過文獻探討,了解全語言與環境教育的異同與相輔相成出現的可能外,研究者並從個人最感興趣之兒童文學出發,以行動研究的方式,於教學現場實際體驗環境教育結合全語言所需面對的問題與解決問題之經過與意義。最後研究者並歸納出研究歷程中所面對之環境教育、全語言、兒童文學及教育改革之議題,提供四者交互運用及再思考之建議。
    整個行動研究歷程持續一個學期,過程中研究者皆以研究札記、協同研究教師省思札記、參與觀察、深入訪談、文件收集……等作為資料來源。隨著研究推展,研究者對全語言之體認日漸深刻,對於研究之關切亦由圖畫書的使用,轉移至「教」與「學」的探究,並逐漸覺察到環境教育對教育之探究不足,正是環境教育無法跳脫以「融入」及「插入」進入學校課程的主因,亦是造成環境教育教師專業地位與自信無法提昇之故。
    研究者除在結論中提出,全語言為與環境教育一致的教育哲學外,亦認為環境問題及教育問題是一體的兩面,結合全語言與環境教育推動教育改革,等於結合更多人的力量,共同為環境及教育而努力,而兒童文學是很好的教學及傳播工具,其中的美感經驗有助於環境倫理的培養。最後針對環境教育師資訓練、環境素養階層、兒童文學的使用、九年一貫課程改革,研究者皆提出批判性之觀點與討論,並對後續全語言及環境教育研究提供進一步之建議。

    Whole language philosophy believes that language is learned best and easiest when it is whole and in natural context. Whole language pedagogues believe that schools should complement the way children are learning language effectively and naturally at home. “Authentic”, “holistic” and “real” are the key characteristics of whole language philosophy. Seemingly, whole language’s philosophy and idea coincide very much with the most current trends of environmental education development, which strongly emphasizes that environmental educator should “utilize the surrounding environment as an integrated context for curriculum integration, development, and learning.” Through reference review, the researcher analyzed and compared the similarities and differences existed between environmental education and whole language philosophy. This action research started in using children’s literature to frame the curriculum. All the problems the researcher and teacher researchers faced and the meanings of the problem solving process were recorded to provide suggestions to environmental education, whole language philosophy, children’s literature and education reform.
    During the action research, the teachers’ reflection diaries, researcher’s diaries, field observation records, in-depth interviews and other documents are utilized as data analysis resources. As the research went on, the view of the researcher on the whole language philosophy was gradually changed. The focus of the research shifted from using picture books to reflective teaching. Through the research, the researcher noticed there are some deep-rooted weak points of environmental education, which rely too much on infusion and insertion but not being able to pay more attention to the fundamental issues and concerns in education. The environmental education professional status and the confidence of environmental educator are unable to be elevated, due to the same reason.
    In the conclusion, the researcher indicates that whole language philosophy is very much consistent with environmental education philosophy. There is a new opportunity for environmental education to renew its mission and vision and also enrich the education system. Integrating whole language philosophy and environmental education can benefit both environment and education. Although, the expectation of using children’s literature encounter some barriers, the researcher also believe that children’s literature is a very charming materials for the practice of environmental education and communication. The aesthetic experience of children’s literature could nurture the development of environmental ethics. Finally, the researcher provide some critical thoughts toward environmental education teacher training, environmental literacy, utilization of children’s literature, and the nine-year new curriculum of Taiwan. Also, some recommendations are provided for further research on whole language and environmental education.

    謝 誌…………………………………………………………………………..…...I 中文摘要…………………………………………………………………………..….II 英文摘要…………………………………………………………………………..…III 內容目次…………………………………………………………………………..….V 圖目錄………………………………………………………………………..…..VI 表目錄………………………………………………………………………..….VII 第一章 緒 論………………………………………………………………………..1 第一節 研究背景、動機與重要性……………………………….…..………...1 第二節 研究目的與課題…………………………………………………...….7 第三節 研究限制……………………………………………………………....7 第二章 文獻探討…………………………………………………………………..11 第一節 全語言與環境教育……………………………...…………………...12 第二節 環境教育教師專業發展‧全語言‧教育行動研究…………………33 第三節 環境教育‧故事‧全語言‧兒童文學(圖畫書)…………………42 第三章 研究方法…………………………………………………………………..53 第一節 研究設計…………………………………………………….…...…..53 第二節 研究方法與流程………………………….……….………………....58 第三節 資料蒐集與分析………………………………….……………….....60 第四章 研究歷程與分析…………………………………………………………..65 第一節 研究情境…………………………...……………….………………..65 第二節 以夏老師為主的時期………………..………………………………74 第三節 以大丸子老師為主的時期……………...………………………….112 第五章 學習、省思與討論………………………………………………………139 第一節 我—研究者的學習與省思………………………...……………….140 第二節 綜合討論—明日的學校與教師……………………...…………….150 第六章 結論與建議………………………………………………………………169 第一節 結論…………………………………………………………………170 第二節 建議…………………………………………………………………174 參考文獻……………………………………………………..……………………..179 附錄 附錄一 研究歷程表…………………………………………………………187 附錄二 深度訪談資料………………………………………………………201 附錄三 研究工具……………………………………………………………211 附錄四 學習檔案之旅………………………………………………………221 附錄五 學生檔案資料………………………………………………………229 圖目錄 圖2-1 全語言的根源………………………………………………………………21 圖2-2 全語言的哲學模式…………………………………………………………39 圖2-3 行動研究的螺旋模式………………………………………………………40 圖3-1 研究流程圖…………………………………………………………………59 圖4-1 小丸子勁報對研究者的報導………………………………………………71 圖4-2 夏老師的教室配置圖………………………………………………………79 圖4-3 大丸子老師的教室………………………………………………………..115 表目錄 表2-1 全語言與環境教育的比較…………………………………………………31 表4-1 研究時程與分析討論摘要…………………………………………………73

    日本兒童與社區營造研究會(編),葉素惠(譯)(1996/2000):《兒童社區探險隊:激發想像力的遊戲》。台北:遠流出版社。
    王恭志(2000):〈教師教學信念與教學實務之探析〉。《教育研究資訊》(台北),8(2),84-98。
    王淑枝(1998):《以生物區域主義為哲學基礎發展鄉土教學活動課程之行動研究》。國立台灣師範大學環境教育研究所,碩士論文。
    王鑫、Steve Simpson、李淑媛(1995):〈發展教師環境教育哲學之研究〉。《環境教育季刊》。(台北),26期,1-16。
    古德曼(Goodman, K.),李連珠(譯)(1986/1998):《全語言的「全」,全在哪裡?》。台北:信誼基金出版社。
    古德曼(Goodman, K.),洪月女(譯)(1996/1998):《談閱讀》。台北:心理出版社。
    史密德(Schmieder, A. A.),周儒(譯)(1988):〈環境教育的本質和原理:目標和目的〉。見行政院環境保護署(編):《環境保護論文集》。台北:行政院環境保護署。
    艾斯(Ets, M. H.),林真美(譯)(1996):《和我玩好嗎?》。台北:遠流出版社。
    吳佩昇(1996):《我國國小教師專業發展活動型態之探討》。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所,碩士論文。
    李聰明(1989):《環境教育》。台北:台灣學生書局。
    沈添鉦、黃秀文(1997):《全語教學在小學實施的成效、困難與策略之研究》。行政院國家科學委員會,專題研究計畫成果報告。
    那伯漢、崔姆怕(Nabhan, G. P. & Trimble, S.),陳阿月(譯)(1994/1998):《童年沃野》。台北:新苗文化。
    亞榮隆撒可努(2000):《山豬.飛鼠.撒可努》。台北:易讀書坊。
    周儒(1993):〈環境教育規劃與設計〉。《環境教育季刊》(台北),16期,17-25。
    周儒(1994a): 《環境教育師資培訓(在職訓練)相關問題之探討與評析研究》。台北:教育部環境保護小組。
    周儒(1994b): 《推動環境教育策略之研究》。台北:行政院環境保護署、中華民國環境教育學會。
    周儒(1998):〈環境教育的神話與迷思〉。《廣州師院學報》(廣州),20卷,18-20。
    周儒(1998):《國民中小學環境教育課程編製理論》。台北:行政院環境保護署。
    周儒(2000):〈行動研究與教師環境教育能力之發展〉。《台灣教育》(台北),589期,22-28。
    周儒、張子超、呂建政(1996): 《自然教育中心實施狀況之研究》。台北:教育部環境保護小組。
    周儒、陳佩正(2000):《「眾樹歌唱」環境教育輔助教材》。台北:行政院環境保護署、行政院農業委員會、教育部、財團法人時報文教基金會。
    林良(1976):《淺語的藝術》。台北:國語日報出版社。
    林雅慧(2000):《全語取向教室中的控制與所有權之個案研究》。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所,碩士論文。
    庫尼(Conney, B.),方素珍(譯)(2000):《花婆婆》。台北:三之三文化事業股份有限公司。
    晏涵文(1998):《環境教育教學活動設計》。台北:教育部。
    張弘明(1990):《國小教師環境教育障礙之研究》。中國文化大學地理研究所地理組,碩士論文。
    張湘君(2001):〈開放教育總動員---讓師生一起動起來〉。見國立台北範學院初等教育系(承辦):《全國兒童閱讀種子教師研習會手冊 (第三次) 》。台北:教育部。
    強森(Johnson, S.),游羽蓁(譯)(1999):《誰搬走了我的乳酪?》。台北:奧林文化事業股份有限公司。
    教育部(2000):《國民中小學九年一貫課程試辦工作輔導手冊》。台北:教育部。
    荷姆斯小組(The Holmes Group),郭玉霞、高政英(譯)(1995):《明日教師》。台北:師大書苑。
    連寬寬(1997):〈故鄉的芬芳〉。見楊思偉(主編):《新教育實踐—開放教育、鄉土教育、田園教學分析》。台北:師大書苑。
    陳佩正(2000):《從「心」教學 : 行動研究與教師專業成長》。臺北:心理出版社。
    傅林統(1990):《兒童文學的思想與技巧》。台北:富春文化。
    富蘭、韓格瑞天(Fullan, M. & Hargreaves, A.),黃錦樟、葉建源(譯)(2000):《學校與改革—人本主義的傾向》。台北:稻田出版有限公司。
    童惠芬(1998):《探索國小教師實施環境教育之需求》。國立台灣師範大學環境教育研究所,碩士論文。
    童惠芬、周儒、陳佩正(1999);〈國小教師發展環境教育知能之需求因素的分析〉。《第六屆海峽兩岸環境保護研討會論文集》。高雄:中山大學。
    馮朝霖(2000):〈化混沌之情、原天地之美---從情意教育到教育美學〉。見崔光宙、林逢祺(主編):《教育美學》。台北:五南圖書出版有限公司。
    黃迺毓、李坤珊、王碧華(1994):《童書非童書》。台北:宇宙光出版社。
    黃瑞琴(2001):《質的教育研究方法》。台北:心理出版社。
    黃繼仁(1997):《美國小學全語言教學之研究》。國立台灣師範大學教育學系,碩土論文。
    楊冠政(1993):〈環境素養〉。《環境教育季刊》(台北),19期,2-14。
    楊冠政(1997):《環境教育》。台北:明文書局。
    楊冠政(1999):《國民中小學環境教育課程編製理論》。台北:行政院環境保護署。
    葛林德列(Grindley, S.),黃郇瑛(2000) :《天空為什麼是藍色的?》。新竹:和英出版社。
    詹姆斯(James, C.)(編),林淑貞(譯)(1999):《印地安之歌》。台北:張老師。
    熊召弟(1991):〈環境教育活動設計的原則〉。《環境教育特刊》。台北:台北市立師範學院環境教育中心,4-9。
    蔡清田(2000):《教育行動研究》。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
    蔡蕙如(2000):《學習外一章:運用兒童讀物實施全語文教學活動之行動研究~以一個課輔班為例》。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所,碩士論文。
    鄭昭明(1993):《認知心理學》。台北:桂冠圖書公司。
    賴盈君(2000):《國小二年級國語科實施全語取向教學之個案研究》。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所,碩士論文。
    賴雅芬(1997):《國小教師環利用鄉土教學活動進行環境教育之參與式行動研究》。國立台灣師範大學環境教育研究所,碩士論文。
    韓德森(Henderson, J. G.),李慕華(譯)(1992/2000):《反思教學:成為一位探究的教育者》。台北:心理出版社股份有限公司。
    豐子愷(1988):《豐子愷論藝術》。台北:丹青圖書公司。
    蘇振明(1997):〈認識兒童讀物插畫及其教育性〉。《美育月刊》(台北),9期,1-10。

    Adams, C. E., Biddle, B. A., & Thomas, J. K. (1988). Present status of environmental science in Texas public school. Journal of Environmental Education, 19(3), 19-24.
    Bardwell, L. (1991). Success Stories:Imagery by Example. Journal of Environmental Education, 23(1), 5-10.
    Beirne, E. (1971). Bring environmental education to Bronx. The Journal of Environmental Education, 3(2), 3-4.
    Bergeron, B. S. (1990). What does the term whole language mean? Constructing a definition from the literature. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22(4), 301-329.
    Braus, J. (1999). Powerful pedagogy—Using EE to Achieve your education goals. In NAAEE. EEducator. (pp.17-24). Rock Spring, GA : NAAEE.
    Butzow, C. M. & Butzow, J. W. (1999). Exploring the environment through children’s literature. Englewood, Colorado : Teacher Ideas Press.
    Caduto, M. J., & Bruchac, J. (1997). Keepers of the earth:native American stories and environmental activities for children. Golden, Colorado : Fulcrum, INC.
    Chou, J. (周儒)(1998). Application action research in environmental education in-service teacher training. Article presented at the 27th Annual Conference of The North American Association for Environmental Education, September 4-8, 1998, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A.
    Cochran, J. (1993). Everything you need to know to be a successful Whole language teacher. Nashville, TN : Incentive Publications, Inc.
    Crowell, S (1989, Sept). A new way of thinking: The challenge of the future. Education Leadership, 7, 60-63.
    Davenport, M. R., & Watson, D. J. (1993). Whole language:Philosophy and Work—in Progress. In Brady, S. K., & Sills, T.M. (Ed.) Whole language : history, Philosophy, Practice.(pp1-17). Iowa : Kendall / Hunt Publishing Cpmoany.
    De Young, R. & Monroe, M. C. (1996). Some Fundamentals of Engaging Stories. Environmental Education Research, 2(2), 171-187.
    Edelsky, C. (1990). Whose Agenda Is This Anyway? A Response to McKenna, Robinson, and Miller. Educational Researcher, 19(8), 7-11.
    Ellis, B.”Fox.” (1997). Learning form the land:teaching ecology through stories and activities. Englewood, Colorado : Teacher Ideas Press.
    Englson, D. C.(1985). A Guide to Curriculum Planning in Environmental Education. Wisconsin : Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
    Fien, J., & Corcoran, P. B. (1996) Learning for a sustainable environment:Professional development and teacher education in Environmental Education in the Asia—Pacific Region. Environmental Education Research, 2(2), 227-236.
    Fien, J., & Rawling, R. (1996). Reflective practice:A case study of professional development for environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 27(3), 11-20.
    Fien, J., Heck, D., & Ferreira, J. (Eds.)(1997). Learning for sustainable Environment.UNESCO-ACEID & CIREE.
    Filipic, M. (2000). Best Practices for Environmental Education:Guidelines for Success. Columbus, Ohio : Environmental Education Counceil of Ohio.
    Flanagan, R. (1999). Education and the Environment:Partners for Change. In NAAEE. EEducator. (pp.4-12). Rock Spring, GA : NAAEE.
    Froese, Victor (Ed.)(1991). Whole-language : Practice and theory. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. In NAAEE. EEducator. (pp.40-44). Rock Spring, GA : NAAEE.
    Glenn, J. M. (1999). From the inside out:professional development in environmental education. In NAAEE. EEducator. (pp.40-44). Rock Spring, GA : NAAEE.
    Goodman Y. M., & Goodman, K. S. (1990) Vygotsky in a whole-language perspective. In Moll, L. C. (Ed.)(1990). Vygotsky and education. New York : Cambridge University Press.
    Goodman, K. S.(1986). What’s whole in whole language? Portsmouth, NH : Heinemann.
    Goodman, K.S. (1992). I didn’t found whole language. The Reading Teacher, 46(3), 188-199.
    Goodman, Y. M. (1989). Roots of whole-language movement. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 113-127.
    Ham, S. H., & Sewing, D. R. (1988). Barriers to environmental education. The Joutnal of Environmental Education, 19(2), 25-33.
    Ham, S. H., Rellergert-Taylor, M. H., Krumpe, E. E. (1988). Reducing barriers to environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 19(2), 25-33.
    Harste, J. C. & Lowe, K. S. (1991, winter). Whole language: Getting the act toghter. Contemporary Education, 62(2), 76-81.
    Heimlich, J. E. (1999). Knowing what works:Trends in Educational Assessment. In NAAEE. EEducator.(pp.52-55). Rock Spring, GA : NAAEE.
    Johnson, B. & Stone, E. (1991, winter). Is whole language restructuring our classroom? Contemporary Education, 62(2), 102-104.
    Kirk, K. A. & Karbon, J. (1986). Environmental Content in Award-winning Children’s Literature:1960 through 1982. Journal of Environmental Education, 17(3), 1-7.
    Kriesberg, D. A. (1999). A Sense of Place:teaching children about the Environment with picture books. Englewood, CO : Teacher Ideas Press.
    Lauritzen, C. & Jaeger, M. (1997). Integrating Learning through Story:the Narrative Curriculum. USA : Delmar Publishers.
    Liberman, G. A. (2000,May/June) Putting the environment back into education. Environmental Communicator, 30(3).
    Liberman, G.A., & Hoddy, M.A. (1998). Closing the achievement gap. California: Science Wizards.
    Lieberman, G. A. (1995). Pieces of Puzzle. California: Science Wizards.
    Lipa, S. E., & Harlin, R., & Lonberger, R. (1991) The Whole Language Journey. Ontario : Pippin Publishing Ltd.
    Madina, G. (2000, May/June). Improving Student Learning:EETAP and Education Reform. Environmental Communicator, 30(3).
    McKinsey, L. (1990-91). Integrating whole language and outdoor education. Journal of Outdoor Education, 25, 19-22.
    Monroe, M. C., & Cappaert, D. (1994a). Defining Environmental Education. Ann Arbor, Michigan : University of Michign.
    Monroe, M. C., & Cappaert, D. (1994b). Integrating Environmental Education Into the School Curriculum. Ann Arbor, Michigan : University of Michign.
    Moss, B. (1992). Nonfiction trade books in the elementary curriculum. Education Digest, 57(8), 66-69.
    Newman, J. M. (1991). Whole Language:A Changed Universe. Contemporary Education, 62(2), 70-75.
    Newman, J. M.(Ed.). (1985). Whole language theory and use. Portsmouth, NH : Heinemann.
    Newman, J. M., & Church, S. M. (1990). Myths of Whole Language. The reading Teacher, 44, 20-26.
    Noy, R. V. (1994, Oct). Teaching Nature, Teaching Writing:a course on environmental literature. TETYC, 206-214.
    O’Brien, K. & Stoner, D. K. (1987, Oct). Increasing environmental awareness through children’s literature. The Reading Tacher, 14-19.
    Ohio Environmental Education Fund (1999). Ohio Environmental Education Fund general grant program 1999-2000. Columbus, Ohio : Author.
    Orr, D.W. (1994). Earth in mind. Washington : Island Press.
    Papadimitriou, V. (1995). Professional development of in-service primary teachers in environmental education:An action research approach. Environmental Eduaction Research, 1(1), 85-97.
    Peetom, A. (1991). The Pain of Shifting Paradigams. Contemporary Education, 62(2), 105-114.
    Ragllon, R. (1993). Reading the World:Overt and Covert Learning in Environmental writing for Children. Journal of Environmental Education, 24(4), 4-7.
    Raines, S. C. (Ed.)(1995). Whole Language Across the Curriculum:grades1, 2, 3. New York : Teacher College Press.
    Reutzel, D. R. & Hollingsworth P. M. (1988). Whole Language and the Practitioner. In De Carlo, J. E. (Ed.). (1995). Perspectives in Whole Language (pp.17-23). Boston : Allyn and Bacon.
    Roth, C. E. (1992). Environmental literacy. It’s root, evolution and directions in the 1990s. Columbus, Ohio: ERIC/CSMEE. Clearinghouse for science, Mathematics, and environmental education.
    Schwab, K. E. (1983). Instructional methods : Their use and effectiveness is environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 14(2), 8-12.
    Simmons, D. (1995). Paper on the Development of Environmental Education Standards. Troy, OH : NAAEE.
    Simmons, D. A. (1989) More infusion confusion : A look at environmental education curriculum materials. Journal of Environmental Education, 20(4), 15-18.
    Simpson, S. (1988). Speaking for the Tree:The use of literature to convey outdoor education themes. Journal of Environmental Education, 19(3), 32-37.
    Smith, P. G. (1991). A Practical Guide to Whole Language. Contemporary Education, 62(2), 88-95.
    Smyth, J. C. (1988). What makes education environmental? In Briceno, S. & Pitt, D. C. (Ed.). New ideas in environmental education. (pp33-56). London : Croom Helm.
    Smyth, J. C. (1995). Environment and Education:a view of a changing scene. Environmental Education Research, 1(1), 3-20.
    Stables, A. & Bishop, K. (2001). Weak and Strong conceptions of environmental literacy:implications for environmental education. Environmental Education, 7(1), 89-97.
    Stapp, W. B., Wals, A. E., & Stanlorb, S. L. (1996). Environmental education for empowerment:action research and community problem solving. Iowa : Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
    Strauss, S. (1996). The Passionate Fact. Golden, Colorado : North American Press.
    Sussman, A. (1999). A Primer on Education Reform. In NAAEE. EEducator. (pp.14-16). Rock Spring, GA : NAAEE.
    Sussman, A. (2000, May/June). Integrating Environmental Education and Systemic Education Reform in Utah. Environmental Communicator, 30(3).
    Toth, S. (2000, May/June). Model school links environemntal education with education reform. Environmental Communicator, 30(3).
    Turbill, J. & Cambourne, B. (1997). The Changing Face of Whole Language. Australian:Australian Literacy Educators’ Association, Ltd.
    Wade, K. S. (1996). EE teacher inservice education:The need for new perspectives. The Journal of Environmental Education, 27(2), 11-17.
    Watson, D. J. (1989). Defining and Describing Whole language. In De Carlo, J. E. (Ed.). (1995). Perspectives in Whole Language (pp.5-16). Boston : Allyn and Bacon.
    Wilson, L. (1997). Defining whole language in a postmodern age. In Turbill, J., & Cambourne, B. (1997) The Changing Face of Whole Language. (pp.26-32) Australian:Australian Literacy Educators’ Association, Ltd.
    Wilson, R. A. (1993). Educator for Earth:a guide for early childhood instruction. Journal of Environmental Education, 24(2), 15-21.
    Wilson, R. A. (Ed.)(1994). Environmental education at the Early Childhood level. NAAEE.

    QR CODE