簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 殷康妍
Yin, Kang-Yan
論文名稱: 企業社會責任的實踐與價值——以中日韓重工企業為個案研究
Implementation and Value of Corporate Social Responsibility – the case study of Heavy industry In China, Japan, and Korea
指導教授: 印永翔
Ying, Yung-Hsiang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理研究所
Graduate Institute of Management
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 68
中文關鍵詞: 企業社會責任重工業企業價值
英文關鍵詞: Corporate Social Responsibility, Heavy Industry, Corporate Values
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.GIM.004.2018.F08
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:168下載:21
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨着經濟發展導致的環境問題日益緊迫,企業社會責任的地位逐漸上升,不論是已開發國家的企業主動執行,或是開發中國家的企業受政府政策約束被動執行,均對此有所作為。本研究針對中日韓三家大型重工企業的企業社會責任(Corporate Social Responsibility)作為,分別定義廣義及狹義的企業行為,尋求不同開發程度國家企業間的異同之處並於學術界理論對應。

    As environmental pollution issues - the side effects of economic development - has been becoming an urgency day by day, corporate social responsibility plays a more and more critical role in the world. Either corporations or governments started to take actions: some corporations in developed countries showed their willingness to be responsible and corporations in developing countries were forced to reform under the pressure of their governments' new environmental policies. This study has a focus on three corporations' initiatives of corporate social responsibility, which are representatives of heavy industry in China, Japan, and South Korea. Additionally, the study analyzes the initiatives of corporate social responsibility in general theory and narrow perspectives as well as seeks to apply theories on distinguishing the initiatives of developed countries' corporations and the initiatives of developing countries' corporations.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 研究流程 5 第二章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 企業社會責任 6 第二節 企業價值 12 第三節 企業社會責任與企業價值之間的關係 13 第三章 研究步骤与方法 17 第一節 研究對象之定義與衡量 17 第二節 預期成果 18 第四章 個案研討 19 第一節 日本小松製作所 19 第二節 韓國現代汽車集團 34 第三節 中國三一重工集團 59 第五章 結論與建議 64 第一節 研究結論 64 第二節 研究限制及後續研究建議 65 參考文獻 67

    1. 李正。 企業社會責任與企業價值相關性研究——來自滬市上市公司的經驗證據[J]. 中國工業經濟,2006(2):77-83;
    2. 朱雅琴,姚海鑫。企業社會責任與企業價值關係的實證研究 [J].財經問題研究,2010(2):102-105;
    3. 王曉巍,陳慧。基於利益相關者的企業社會責任與企業價值關係研究 [J]. 管理科學,2011(6):29-37;
    4. 沈洪濤。公司特徵與公司社會責任資訊披露 [J] .會計研究, 2007, (3):9 -16;
    5. 王懷明, 宋濤。我國上市公司社會責任與企業績效的實證研究 [J].南京師範大學學報(社會科學版), 2007, (2):58 -62;
    6. 馬連福, 趙穎。上市公司社會責任資訊披露影響因素研究 [J].證券市場導報, 2007, (3):4 -9;
    7. 溫素彬, 方苑。企業社會責任與財務績效關係的實證研究 [J] .中國工業經濟, 2008, (10):150-160;
    8. 王建瓊, 何靜誼.公司治理、企業經濟績效與企業社會責任[ J] .經濟經緯, 2009, (2):83 -86;
    9. BOWEN H R.1953. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman [M] .New York: Harper, Rowand Brothers;
    10. CARROLLAB.1979.A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance [J] .Academy of Management Review, 4(4): 497 -505;
    11. Schaltegger S,Synnestvedt T. The Link between「Green」and Economic Success:Environmetal Manageent as the Crucial Trigger between Environmental and Economic Performance[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2002,65(4):339-346;
    12. Waddocks,S A,Gravess,S B. The Corporate Social Performance Financial Performance Link[J]. Strategic Management Jounal,1997,18(4):303-309;
    13. Preston L E,Banno D P. The Corporate Social Financial Performance Relationship:A Typology and Analysis[J]. Business and Society,1997,36(12):419-429;
    14. Moskowitz, M.Choosing Socially Responsible Stocks [J].Business and Society Review, 1972, (1):71 -75;
    15. Ruf, B.M., Muralidhar K.R., Brown M. An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective [J].Journal of Business Ethics, 2001, (2):143 -157;
    16. Vance, S.C. Are Socially Responsible Corporations Good Investment Risks? [J] .Management Review,1975, (8):18 -24;
    17. Holman, Walter R., New, J.Rando1 Ph, and Singer Daniel, The Impact of Corporate Social Responsiveness on Shareholder Wealth [J] .Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 1985, (7):137 -152;

    下載圖示
    QR CODE