本研究旨在透過行動研究，探討交錯練習應用在高中一年級數學科可能會面臨到的問題，並且找出可行的解決方法。本研究對象為桃園市一所公立高中的一年級普通科學生，全班總計33人，為期六周。本研究採行動研究方式進行，一共三個循環，其中根據不同單元特性，分別採用組外交錯、組內交錯以及組內與組外同時交錯的方式進行。期間蒐集學生練習卷的作答狀況、段考試題卷、學生個人訪談紀錄及課堂觀察，進行質性分析並利用三角驗證法確保分析品質。研究者另蒐集前後測成績與對照班進行共變異數分析。研究結果顯示該班在實施交錯練習後雖然並未達到顯著，但可以觀察到兩班的平均數差距變小，且估計的邊緣平均值也高於對照班。最後，研究者對研究結果提出建議，供教師及其他研究者參考。

This study investigated some of the questions the case class might face during Interleaved Practiced in Mathematics among first-grade senior high school students and finding possible solutions to these questions. The participants are public high school students based in Taoyuan, and all 33 of them are general education students. The researcher conducted the study based on the Action Research method with three cycles. Each cycle was conducted with three different characteristics: “Interleaved out of a unit”, “Interleaved within a unit,” and “Interleaved within and out of units,” all three characteristics are conducted at the same time.
After these cycles, the researcher collected the students’ practiced records, exam records, personal interview records, and classroom observation records during this period. Data triangulation was conducted by comparing and contrasting multiple data resources. Also, this study collected before and after exam score records for the study group and “Non- interleaved practiced class” (control group) and performed covariance analysis with the control group.
Although the result shows no significant score differences, the researcher found that the gap between the average of the study group and the control group had become smaller. Moreover, the estimated marginal average for the study group is higher than the control group.In the end, the researcher provides some suggestions for teachers and other researchers for reference based on the study findings.

阮光勳（2014）。促進質性研究的品質與可信性。國教新知，61（1），92-102。
馬集（1973）。回憶馬克思恩格斯。人民出版社。
黃政傑（1999)。落實教學評鑑的實施。教師天地，99，39-45。
蔡清田（2000）。教育行動研究。五南。
甄曉蘭（2003）。課程行動研究。師大書苑。
王文科、王智弘（2014）。教育研究法。五南。
葉新東、朱瑩瑩、張樂、陳淑潔（2017）。交錯學習研究的起源、立論基礎和研究展望。遠程教育雜誌，1，60-71。
張俊彥、李哲迪、任宗浩、林碧珍、張美玉、曹博盛、陽文金、張瑋寧（2018）。國際數學與科學教育成就趨勢調查 2015 (TIMSS 2015)：臺灣精簡國家成果報告。
Bjork R.A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. Metacognition : knowing about Knowing (pp.185-205). A Bradford Book.
Ebbinghaus H. (1998). Memory : a contribution to experimental psychology. Thoemmes Press.
Kang S.H.K. (2016). The benefits of interleaver practice for learning. In J.C. Horvath, J.M. Lodge, & J. Hattie (Eds), From the Laboratory to the Classroom: Translating Science of Learning for Teachers (pp. 79-92). Routledge.
Mielicki, Marta K (2019). Exploring the Necessary Conditions for Observing Interleaved Practice Benefits in Problem Solving. University of Illinois at Chicago. Thesis. https://hdl.handle.net/10027/23666
Agarwal P.K., & Agostinelli A. (2020). Interleaving in Math. American Educator. https://www.aft.org/ae/spring2020/agarwal_agostinelli?fbclid=IwAR1YtnvPx5FNLZuAbSgoLQ_CA3OgSgZiguySDVKLkm1UJCLm1nStPgNt0Zw
Anderson L.W., Krathwohl D., & Bloom B.S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing : a revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Pearson
Carter C.E. & Grahn J.A. (2016). Optimizing Music Learning: Exploring How Blocked and Interleaved Practice Schedules Affect Advanced Performance. Front. Psychol. 7:1251. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01251
Goode S., & Magill R.A. (1986). Contextual Interference Effects in Learning Three Badminton Serves. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 57(4),308-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1986.10608091

Goldin S.B., Horn G.T., Schnaus Jr. M.J., Grichanik M., Ducey A.J., Nofsinger C., Hernandez D.J., Shames M.L., Singh R.P., & Brannick M.T. (2014). FLS Skill Acquisition: A Comparison of Blocked vs Interleaved Practice. Journal of Educational, 71(4), 506-512.
Hausman H. & Kornell N. (2014). Mixing Topics while Studying Does Not Enhance Learning. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 3,3(3) ,153–160
Kornell N., & Bjork R.A. (2008). Learning concepts and categories is spacing the “enemy of induction”. Psychological science , 19(6) , 585-592.
Kurtz K.H., & Hovland C.I. (1956). Concept learning with differing sequences of instances. Journal of experimental psychology, 51(4) , 239-243.
Pan S.C., Tajran J., Lovelett J., Osuna J., & Rickard T. C. (2019). Does interleaved practice enhance foreign language learning? The effects of training schedule on Spanish verb conjugation skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(7), 1172–1188. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000336
Rohrer D., Robert F., Dedrick, & Stershic S. (2015). Interleaver Practice Improves Mathematics Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 900-908.
Rohrer D., Dedrick R.F., Hartwig M.K., & Cheung C.N. (2020). A Randomized Controlled Trial of Interleaved Mathematics Practice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(1), 40-52.
Richland L.E., Bjork R.A., & Finley J.R. (2005) . Linking cognitive science to education : Generation and interleaving effects . Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 27.
Rau M.A., Aleven V., & Rummel N. (2013). Interleaved practice in multi-dimensional learning tasks: Which dimension should we interleave? Learning and Instruction, 23, 98-114.
Simon D.A., & Bjork R.A. (2001). Metacognition in Motor Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology : learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(4) , 907-912.
Taylor K., & Rohrer D. (2009). The effects of interleaved practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(6), 749-898.
Yan V.X., Bjork E.L., & Bjork R.A. (2016). On the Difficulty of Mending Metacognitive Illusions: A Priori Theories, Fluency Effects, and Misattributions of the Interleaving Benefit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General . 145(7) , 918-933.