簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張芷嫣
CHANG, Chih-Yen
論文名稱: 技術型高中學生自我效能、恆毅力、自我調整學習與自主學習成效之關係
A Research on the Relationship among Self-Efficacy, Grit, Self-Regulated Learning, and Learning Outcome in Self-Regulated Learning for Vocational High Schools' Students
指導教授: 李懿芳
Lee, Yi-Fang
口試委員: 林清南
Lin, Ching-Nan
宋修德
Sung, Hsiu-Te
李懿芳
LEE, Yi-Fang
口試日期: 2022/08/02
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工業教育學系
Department of Industrial Education
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 118
中文關鍵詞: 自主學習成效自我效能自我調整學習技術型高中恆毅力
英文關鍵詞: Grit, Self-Efficacy, Self-Regulated Learning, Self-Regulated Learning Outcome, Vocational High School
研究方法: 調查研究
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202201172
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:185下載:56
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 面對知識更新迅速、技術不斷創新升級,自主學習能力成為適應未來社會所需的關鍵能力,培養具備自主學習的終身學習者成為國內外教育改革的主要趨勢;有鑑於此,國內108課綱將自主學習列入技術型高中彈性學習時間的項目之一,鼓勵學生於在校時間進行自主學習,從中增進自我規劃學習的能力。國內探討影響技術型高中學生自主學習因素之研究有限,故本研究旨在分析技術型高中學生自我效能、恆毅力、自我調整學習與自主學習成效之關係,並驗證影響技術型高中學生自主學習成效模型,以了解影響學生自主學習成效的關鍵因素。本研究採調查研究法,運用研究者編修之「技術型高中學生自主學習經驗問卷」進行資料蒐集;樣本以立意抽樣,由學者專家與資深校長推薦8所落實推動自主學習且具成效之技術型高中為樣本學校,以曾選修彈性學習時間之自主學習課程至少一學期的學生為研究對象,經樣本學校推薦共409份,回收之有效問卷共323份;所得量化資料採取描述性統計分析、結構方程模型等方法,進行統計分析。主要研究結論包含:一、自我效能與恆毅力具顯著正相關。二、自我效能與恆毅力對自我調整學習能力皆有顯著預測力。三、自我調整學習能力愈好者,其自主學習成效愈佳。四、本研究提出之影響技高學生自主學習因素之關聯模型適配度良好。本研究依研究結論提出具體建議供教育行政機關、學校單位及技術型高中教師參考,包括:一、技高教師可透過教學或活動指導機會,持續增強學生的自我效能。二、技高學生宜持續提升動機等面向之自我調整學習能力。三、技高教師在指導學生進行自主學習時,可善用本研究模型之變項關係,以提升學生自主學習成效。

    With the modern knowledge ever updating and the rapid advancement of technology, self-regulated learning ability has become one of the deciding factors in adapting to future society. To cultivate students with such ability in order to become lifelong learners has become a prevailing trend in recent education reforms in the world. Accordingly, the Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education implemented in 2019 included self-regulated learning as one of the options for alternative learning courses in vocational high schools. It encouraged students to conduct self-regulated learning at school and to develop their ability to schematize their learning. This study aimed to analyze the relations among self-efficacy, grit, self-regulated learning, and learning outcome in self-regulated learning for students in vocational high schools and to understand the key factors that contributed to self-regulated learning outcome. A survey research via purposeful sampling strategy was conducted. Eight sample schools were recommended by scholars and senior principals and their students who took at least one semester of self-regulated learning were invited to fill in the questionnaire. A total of 409 questionnaires were distributed, and 323 valid ones were returned. Descriptive statistics and structural equation modeling were used to analyze the data. The major findings were generated as followings: 1. Students' self-efficacy and grit were predictive factors on their self-regulated learning outcomes. 2. Students' self-regulated learning ability was significantly correlated to their self-regulated learning outcome. 3. The research model proposed in this study fitted well with the data. Based on the findings, several suggestions were generated for educational bureau, schools, and teachers in vocational high schools. The suggestions were as follows: 1. Teachers of vocational high school can continue increasing students’ self-efficacy through teaching or actitivty instructions. 2. Students of vocational high schools are advised to sharpen their self-regulated learning ability. 3. Teachers of vocational high schools, while assisting their students in self-regulated learning, may commit the findings of variables and their correlations in this research model to helping boost the students’ self-regulated learning.

    摘 要 i Abstracti i 目 次 iv 表 次 vi 圖 次 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與背景 1 第二節 研究目的與待答問題 4 第三節 研究範圍與限制 5 第四節 名詞解釋 6 第二章 文獻探討 9 第一節 自我調整學習 9 第二節 自我效能 23 第三節 恆毅力 28 第四節 技術型高中彈性學習時間之自主學習 37 第三章 研究設計與實施 43 第一節 研究變項與架構 43 第二節 研究對象 46 第三節 研究工具 49 第四節 研究流程 68 第五節 資料處理與分析 69 第四章 研究結果與討論 73 第一節 樣本背景與變項之分析結果 73 第二節 一階驗證性因素分析結果 80 第三節 整體結構模式分析結果 84 第四節 路徑關係分析 87 第五節 綜合討論 91 第五章 結論與建議 97 第一節 結論 97 第二節 建議 99 參考文獻 101 壹、中文部分 101 貳、英文部分 107 附錄一、技術型高中自主學習經驗問卷 115

    壹、中文部分
    丁毓珊、葉玉珠(2021)。國中生學習心向、學習自我效能與學習適應之關係:以自我調整學習為中介變項之路徑模式分析。教育研究與發展期刊,17(2),83-117。
    毛國楠、程炳林(1993)。目標層次與目標導向對大學生自我調整學習歷程之影響。教育心理學報,26,85-105。
    王金國(2001)。成功學習的關鍵~自我調整學習。課程與教學季刊,5(1)145-164。
    王聖葶(2013)。網路學習者之學習自我效能、自主學習能力與學習投入之關係研究(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。
    王韻齡(2019年7月31日)。108課綱|高一新生,選修課占總學分1/3,怎麼選才對?。親子天下。取自https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5096191
    任翌瑜(2011)。大學生人格特質、自主學習對於網路學習成效之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。銘傳大學,臺北市。
    吳明隆(2009)。結構方程模式:方法與實務運用。高雄市:麗文。
    吳明隆、涂金堂(2012)。SPSS與統計應用分析。臺北市:五南。
    吳清山(2017a)。意志力。教育研究月刊,275,127-128。
    吳清山(2017b)。自主學習。教育研究月刊,278,133-134。
    吳慧珉、莫慕貞(2019)。自強不息、自我效能、自我調整學習與學業成就之效度:計畫行為理論觀點。測驗學刊,66(3),321-346。
    宋修德、李懿芳、林清南(2021)。技術型高級中等學校自主學習的理念與實踐。臺灣教育評論月刊,10(2),133-141。
    李函穎(2008)。國小高年級學生家庭型態、自我效能、自我調整學習策略與課業學習成就之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。
    李旻樺(2002)。高中學生之自我效能、成功期望、學習任務價值與課業學習動機調整策略之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。
    李懿芳、胡茹萍、田振榮(2017)。技術型高級中等學校技能領域課綱理念、發展方式及其轉化為教科書之挑戰。教科書研究雜誌,10(3),69-99。
    李懿芳、胡茹萍、宋修德(2021)。技術型高級中等學校跨域課程之理念與實踐。台灣教育研究期刊,2(2),53-70。
    周佳穎(2014)。企業員工自我效能對數位學習成效之研究- 以自我調節學習為中介變項(未出版之碩士論文)。中國文化大學,臺北市。
    周勇、董奇(1994)。學習動機、歸因、自我效能感與學生自我監控學習行為的關係研究。心理發展與教育,10(3), 30-33。
    周美珠(2017)。職業自我概念影響自我調整學習策略與學習成效之研究-以桃園市高職餐飲管理科學生為例(未出版之碩士論文)。銘傳大學,臺北市。
    林志成(2020)。如何營造自主學習的環境空間。師友雙月刊,624,160-166。
    林佩瑋(2012)。學生的技能學習風格、自我調整學習策略與學習成效相關研究-以高雄市高職餐飲管理科學生為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄應用科技大學,高雄市。
    林建平(2004)。學童自我調整學習之調查研究。臺北市立師範學院學報,35(1),1-24。
    林建平(2005)。自律學習的理論與研究趨勢。國教新知,52(2),8-25。
    林重岑(2003)。高中職學生自我調整學習的結構模式分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。
    林清山、程炳林(1996)。國中生自我調整學習因素與學習表現之關係既自我調整的閱讀理解教學策略效果之研究。教育心理學報,28,15-57。
    林清文(2003)。高中高職學生基礎學科自我調整課業學習策略研究。中華輔導學報,13,1-44.
    林銘慧(2019)。科技想像傾向量表之發展及其與恆毅力、網路成癮之關聯研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    邱貴發(1992)。電腦輔助教學成效探討。視聽教育雙月刊,33(5),11-18。
    胡詠婷(2019)。大學校院外語推廣教育成人英語學習者自我調控學習與學習成效關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    翁幸瑜(2007)。德語學習者線上與非線上自我調控學習與學習成效之比較研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    張春興(1991)。現代心理學。臺北市:東華書局。
    張春興(1996)。教育心理學¬─三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市:東華書局。
    教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。取自https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL002057
    教育部(2018)。高級中等學校課程規劃及實施要點。
    教育部(2020)。108課綱資訊網。取自https://12basic.edu.tw/learning-v.php
    教育部高中優質化輔助方案資訊網(2020)。彈性學習時間 自主學習 評量規準。取自
    https://saprogram.info/download/%E5%BD%88%E6%80%A7%E5%AD%B8%E7%BF%92%E6%99%82%E9%96%93-%E8%87%AA%E4%B8%BB%E5%AD%B8%E7%BF%92%E8%A9%95%E9%87%8F%E8%A6%8F%E6%BA%96/
    梁茂森(1998)。國中生學習自我效能量表之編制。教育月刊,14,155-192。
    梁晴瀅、林耀南、許雅晴(2021)。恆毅力、自我效能、工作敬業心、心流及個人創新行為關聯性之研究。創造學刊,12(1), 56-81。
    梁雲霞(2006)。從自主學習理論到學校實務—概念架構與方案發展。當代教育研究,14(4),171-206。
    莊石瑛(2004)。英文寫作自我效能、目標導向與自我調整學習策略之探討(未出版之博士論文)。國立屏東科技大學,屏東縣。
    許雅宜(2021)。精神科護理人員工作壓力、自我效能、恆毅力及幸福感的相關性研究(未出版之博士論文)。中國醫藥大學,臺中市。
    陳世耀、賓靜蓀(2017)。恆毅力:每天在一件事情上,讓自己比前一天更進步。天下雜誌,取自https://www.parenting.com.tw/article/5073025
    陳志恆、林清文(2008)。國中學生自我調整學習策略量表之編製及效度研究。輔導與諮商學報,30(2),1-36。
    陳盈樺、林明宏(2019)。大專運動代表隊恆毅力特質之探討。台灣管理學刊,19(1),31-46.
    陳敏銓(2020)。國中生在公民與社會科的目標導向、自我調整學習與學業成就關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
    陳薏文(2016)。技術型高中電機電子群學生自我效能與專題製作學習成效之關係:自我調整學習之中介效果(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    傅建三(2019)。融入恆毅力之刻意練習對中高齡者學習英語自我效能意義之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
    程炳林(2001)。動機、目標設定、行動控制、學習策略之關係:自我調整學習歷程模式之建構及驗證。師大學報:教育類,46(1),67-92。
    程炳林、林清山(2001)。中學生自我調整學習量表之建構及其信效度研究。 測驗年刊,48(1),1-41。
    黃友亘(2019)。成人初顯期個體恆毅力與幸福感的關係:以自我效能為中介變項、未來時間觀為干擾變項(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    黃苡端(2016)。學生學習自我效能、自我調整學習與學習成效關係之研究-以新北市國民中學生物科為例(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立大學,臺北市。
    黃偉翔(2019年5月31日)。【108課綱高職篇1】高職5大改變:在地產業連結,跨班、跨科、跨群、跨校選課,發展職涯力。親子天下。取自https://flipedu.parenting.com.tw/article/005420
    新北市立新北高工課程發發委員會(2018)。新北市立新北高級工業職業學校彈性學習時間實施補充規定。取自https://web.ntvs.ntpc.edu.tw/p/404-1000-2962.php
    趙珮晴、余民寧(2012)。自律學習策略與自我效能、學習興趣、學業成就的相關研究。教育研究集刊,58(3),1-32。
    趙宥寧(2021年1月31日)。新課綱跨領域多元選修技高比高中更落實。聯合報。取自https://udn.com/news/story/121690/5220593
    劉佩雲(2000)。自我調整學習模式之驗證。國立政治大學教育與心理研究,23,173-206。
    劉政宏(2001)國中小學習動機量表之編制及其信、效度研究。測驗學刊,57(3),371-402。
    潘乃欣(2020)。新課綱現場/自主學習…找出「我要學什麼」。聯合新聞網:臺北市。取自https://udn.com/news/story/121690/5129315
    蔡宗倫、陳美如(2022)。運用適性教學輔助平臺融入數學教學提升自我調整學習能力與學習成效之研究。中等教育,73(2),35-54。
    蔡秉勳、林雅芬、陳學志、林小慧與蔡孟寧(2020)。中文版「國小學童恆毅力量表」之編制與驗證。測驗學刊,67(4),237-269。
    鍾明芬(2004)。影響學生學習成效關鍵成功因素之彙整分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。
    蔡淑薇(2004)。高中職學生學習風格、自我調整學習與學業成就之關係(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。
    蔣梅虹(2021)。國民中小學學生自我調整學習與學習成就關聯性之長期追蹤研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
    黎偉倫(2013)。自我調整學習對學習成效之影響—以人格特質及逆境商數為干擾變數(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。
    盧錦姬(2012)。台灣日語學習者自我調整學習模式之研究-達成動機、自我效能、學習策略之關係。東吳外語學報,(35),79-108。
    薛博仁(2012)。高中職商管群學生「專題製作」自我調整學習策略及其影響因素之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立雲林科技大學,雲林縣。
    簡曉芸(2010)。高職學生實作技能自我調整學習量表之編製(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。
    魏麗敏(1996)。影響國小兒童數學成就之自我調節學習與情感因素分析及其策略訓練效果之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    蘇婉慈(2011)。自我效能對壽險銷售人員績效之影響-自我調整學習與知識分享之中介效果(未出版之碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學,臺中市。
    蘇嘉智(2017)。高中職學生知覺教師領導方式與自我調整學習之關係:以數學自我效能感為中介變項(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立大學,臺北市。

    貳、英文部分
    Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
    Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 41(3), 586-598.
    Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. Encyclopedia of human behavior, 4, 71-81.
    Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
    Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay, 20(24), 1.
    Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International journal of educational research, 31(6), 445-457.
    Bouffard, T., Boisvert, J., Vezeau, C., & Larouche, C. (1995). The impact of goal orientation on self‐regulation and performance among college students. British journal of educational psychology, 65(3), 317-329.
    Corno, L. (1993). The best-Iaid plans: Modern Conceptions of Volition and Educational Research. Educational Research, 22(2), 14-22.
    Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational psychologist, 18(2), 88-108.
    Credé, M., Tynan, M. C., & Harms, P. D. (2017). Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 113(3), 492.
    Datu, J. A. D., Yuen, M., & Chen, G. (2017). Development and validation of the Triarchic Model of Grit Scale (TMGS): Evidence from Filipino undergraduate students. Personality and Individual Differences, 114, 198-205.
    Duckworth, A. (2016). Grit: The power of passion and perseverance. New York, NY: Scribner.
    Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (GRIT–S). Journal of personality assessment, 91(2), 166-174.
    Duckworth, A.L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M.D., & Kelly, D.R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1087-1101.
    Eom, S. (2019). The effects of student motivation and self-regulated learning strategies on student's perceived e-learning outcomes and satisfaction. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 19(7), 29-42.
    Gupta, S., & Sudhesh, N. T. (2019). Grit, self-regulation and resilience among college football players: a pilot study. International Journal of Physiology, Nutrition and Physical Education, 4(1), 843-848.
    Hair Jr., J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006) Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson University Press.
    Hair, J. F., Ortinau, D. J., & Harrison, D. E. (2010). Essentials of marketing research (Vol. 2). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
    Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). New York, DC: Sage publications.
    Howe, M. J. A. (1999). Genius explained. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    Kuhl, J. (1984). Volitional Aspects of Achievement Motivation and Learned Helplessness: Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Action Control. In B. A. Maher (Ed.), Progress in Experimental Personality Research, 13, 99-171. New York: Academic Press.
    Latham, G. P., & Pinder, C. C. (2005). Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 56, 485-516.
    Light, A., & Nencka, P. (2019). Predicting educational attainment: Does grit compensate for low levels of cognitive ability?. Learning and Individual Differences, 70, 142-154.
    Lim, H. J., Hwang, M. H., & Ha, H. (2021). The Relationship of Grit, Career Adaptability, Self-Regulated Learning, and Academic Adjustment: Focusing on the Multiple Mediational Effects. Hong Kong Journal of Social Sciences, 57, 184-195.
    Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual review of psychology, 38(1), 299-337.
    Martin, H., Craigwell, R., & Ramjarrie, K. (2021). Grit, motivational belief, self-regulated learning (SRL), and academic achievement of civil engineering students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1-23.
    Mun, K., & Ham, E.H. (2016). An Analysis of the Relationship of Grit, Interest, Task-Commitment, Self-Regulation Ability, and Science Achievement of High School Students. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 36(3), 445-455.
    Muenks, K., Yang, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2018). Associations between grit, motivation, and achievement in high school students. Motivation Science, 4(2), 158.
    Nota, L., Soresi, S., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-regulation and academic achievement and resilience: A longitudinal study. International journal of educational research, 41(3), 198-215.
    Oriol, X., Miranda, R., Oyanedel, J. C., & Torres, J. (2017). The role of self-control and grit in domains of school success in students of primary and secondary school. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1716.
    ÖZHAN, M. B. (2021). Academic self-efficacy and school burnout in university students: Assessment of the mediating role of grit. Current Psychology, 40(9), 4235-4246.
    Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 422.
    Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS quarterly, 401-426.
    Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International journal of educational research, 31(6), 459-470.
    Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekarets & P. R. Pintrich(Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego,CA: Academic Press.
    Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational psychology review, 16(4), 385-407.
    Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F. , García, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, Michigan: National Center for Research to Improve Teaching and Learning, School of Education, The University of Michigan.
    Rojas, J. P., Reser, J. A., Usher, E. L., & Toland, M. D. (2012). Psychometric properties of the academic grit scale. Lexington: University of Kentucky College of Education.
    Ruch, W., Weber, M., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2014). Character strengths in children and adolescents: Reliability and initial validity of the German Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for Youth (German VIA-Youth). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30(1), 57-64.
    Ryan, A. M., Gheen, M. H., & Midgley, C. (1998). Why do some students avoid asking for help? An examination of the interplay among students' academic efficacy, teachers' social–emotional role, and the classroom goal structure. Journal of educational psychology, 90(3), 528.
    Salisbury-Glennon, J. D., Gorrell, J., Sanders, S., Boyd, P., & Kamen, M. (1999). Self-Regulated Learning Strategies Used by the Learners in a Learner-Centered School.
    Scholz, U., Gutiérrez-Doña, B., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(3), 242-251.
    Schunk, D. H. (1989). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. In Self-regulated learning and academic achievement, 83-110.
    Schunk, D. H. (1994). Self-regulation of self-efficacy and attributions in academic settings. Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35-37). Windsor, England: NFER-NELSON.
    Schwarzer, R., Bäßler, J., Kwiatek, P., Schröder, K., & Zhang, J. X. (1997). The assessment of optimistic self‐beliefs: Comparison of the German, Spanish, and Chinese versions of the General Self‐Efficacy Scale. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46(1), 69-88.
    Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
    Sturman, E. D., & Zappala-Piemme, K. (2017). Development of the grit scale for children and adults and its relation to student efficacy, test anxiety, and academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 59, 1-10.
    Trawick, L., & Corno, L. (1995). Expanding the volitional resources of urban community college students. New directions for teaching and learning, 1995(63), 57-70.
    UNESCO Institute for Education. (2003). Nurturing the treasure: Vision and Strategy 2002-2007. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000131145_eng
    Usher, E. L., Li, C. R., Butz, A. R., & Rojas, J. P. (2019). Perseverant grit and self-efficacy: Are both essential for children’s academic success? Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(5), 877-902.
    Winne, P. H. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational psychologist, 30(4), 173-187.
    Wolters, C. A., & Hussain, M. (2015). Investigating grit and its relations with college students’ self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Metacognition and Learning, 10(3), 293-311.
    Xu, K. M., Cunha-Harvey, A. R., King, R. B., de Koning, B. B., Paas, F., Baars, M.,... & de Groot, R. (2021). A cross-cultural investigation on perseverance, self-regulated learning, motivation, and achievement. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 1-19.
    Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Development of self-regulated learning: Which are the key sub-processes? Contemporary Eeducational Psychology, 16, 307-313.
    Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of educational psychology, 81(3), 329.
    Zimmerman, Barry. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Zimmerman, Barry. J., & Kitsantas, A. K. (1996). Self-regulated learning of a motoric skill: The role of goal setting and self-monitoring. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 8(1), 60-75.
    Zimmerman, Barry. J., & Pons, M. M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American educational research journal, 23(4), 614-628.
    Zimmerman, Barry. J., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Self-regulatory dimensions of academic learning and motivation. In Handbook of academic learning (pp. 105-125). Academic Press.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE