簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 王雅鈴
Ya-Ling Wang
論文名稱: 華人依附焦慮傾向與忍耐調控機制:對偶資料之多層次模式分析
Attachment Anxiety Orientation and Forbearance in the Chinese Context:Dyadic Data Analysis Using Multilevel Modeling
指導教授: 蔡順良
Tsai, Shung-Liang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2008
畢業學年度: 96
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 148
中文關鍵詞: 依附焦慮傾向華人忍耐文化目前關係品質個人與伴侶相互依賴模式多層次模式分析
英文關鍵詞: Attachment Anxiety Orientation, Forbearance in the Chinese Context, Quality of Current Relationship, Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM), Multilevel Modeling (MLM)
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:265下載:108
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究試圖以多層次模式分析並收集對偶資料以豐富國內成人依附之研究,主要有四個研究目的:(1)採用互動觀察法並收集對偶資料以分析成人依附之相關議題;(2)探討情侶中自己依附焦慮程度與伴侶依附焦慮程度對彼此正負向互動行為的關係;(3)探討情侶的目前關係品質、自己與伴侶的依附焦慮以及個體正負向互動行為的關係;(4) 以華人文化之觀點探討依附焦慮之特質與行為。
    本研究參與者為台灣北部地區30對成年異性戀情侶,工具為「親密關係經驗量表」,並請情侶進行「關係議題討論任務」的互動。所有的互動過程都將全程錄影以及用「互動向度編碼系統(IDCS)」進行編碼,所收集之對偶資料結合個人與伴侶相互依賴模式(APIM)的概念並以多層次模式(MLM)進行分析,有以下兩個主要發現:
    一、 個體與伴侶的依附焦慮程度皆能顯著預測個體的負向情感、衝突、問題解決技巧與支持肯定。
    二、 目前關係品質的調節作用:
    1. 目前關係品質能調節個體之依附焦慮與個體負向情感的關係:在目前關係品質較好時,自己的依附焦慮程度越高則自己的負向情感也越高;反之,在目前關係品質較差時,自己的依附焦慮越高則自己的負向情感越低。
    2. 目前關係品質能調節伴侶之依附焦慮與個體負向情感的關係:在目前關係品質較好時,伴侶的依附焦慮程度越高則自己的負向情感越低;反之,在目前關係品質較差時,伴侶的依附焦慮越高則自己的負向情感越高。
    3. 目前關係品質能調節個體之依附焦慮與個體衝突的關係:在目前關係品質較好時,自己的依附焦慮程度越高則自己的衝突也越高;反之,在目前關係品質較差時,自己的依附焦慮越高則自己的衝突越低。
    4. 目前關係品質能調節個體之依附焦慮與個體問題解決技巧的關係。在目前關係品質較好時,自己的依附焦慮程度越高則自己的問題解決技巧越差;反之,在目前關係品質較差時,自己的依附焦慮越高則自己的問題解決技巧越好。
    最後,研究者依據研究結果進行討論,並提出本研究之限制與對未來研究之具體建議。

    The purpose of this study was to understand adult attachment and interactions among dating couples by examining (a) dyadic behavior within dating couples using observational method, (b) the degree to which the attachment anxiety orientations of both actors and partners predict of actors’ affect and behaviors, (c) the extent to which the quality of current relationship moderates the associations between attachment anxiety orientations and interactional behaviors, and (d) the forbearance of attachment anxiety in the Chinese context.
    Thirty heterosexual dating couples that had been dating at least for 1 month participated in this study. The mean age of the participants was 23.05 years and these couples had been dating for 26.5 months on average. The participants were first asked to complete the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale (ECR) that assessed their adult attachment orientations. Next, they were required to discuss a major problem in their relationship and try to solve the problem. All discussions and interactions were videotaped and coded with the Interactional Dimensions Coding System (IDCS). Data were analyzed using Multilevel modeling (MLM) and the Actor-Partner Interactional Model (APIM).
    The two major findings were as follows. First, the attachment anxiety orientations of actors and partners served as significant predictors for actors’ negative affect, conflict, problem-solving skills, and support/validation. Second, the quality of each couple’s current relationship moderated the associations between attachment anxiety orientations and interactional behaviors; the moderating effects of current relationship were shown in the following four aspects: (a) the association between actors’ attachment anxiety orientations and actors’ negative affect; (b) the association between partners’ attachment anxiety orientations and actors’ negative affect; (c) the association between actors’ attachment anxiety orientations and actors’ conflict; (d) the association between actors’ attachment anxiety orientations and actors’ problem-solving skills.
    Research limitations were explicated and possible implications for future attachment research and couple studies were discussed in this study.

    目 次 中文摘要 英文摘要 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機與目的……………………………………………………....1 第二節 研究問題與研究假設………………………………………………..7 第三節 名詞釋義…………………………………………………………….......10 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 依附理論的發展與研究………………………………………..….13 第二節 華人的情緒調控機制……………………………………………..…19 第三節 互動行為…………………………………………………………………..24 第四節 目前關係品質……………………………………………………………27 第五節 成人依附之研究方法與資料分析…………………………….33 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究架構…………………………………………………………………..43 第二節 研究對象……………………………………………………………….....44 第三節 研究程序…………………………………………………………………..45 第四節 研究工具…………………………………………………………………..48 第五節 資料分析與本研究模式……………………………………………53 第四章 研究結果 第一節 初步分析……………………………………………………………..…..61 第二節 對偶資料之多層次模式分析…………………………………...70 第五章 討論 第一節 對偶資料之多層次模式分析………………………….……….83 第二節 綜合討論………………………………………………………………...96 第六章 結論與建議 第一節 結論…………………………………………………………………………101 第二節 研究收穫與限制……………………………………………………..103 第三節 啟示與建議………………………………………………………..….105 參考文獻 一、中文資料…………………………………………………………………….....109 二、西文資料………………………………………………………………………..111 附錄 附錄一 研究邀請函、研究宣傳單…………………………………..121 附錄二 研究指導語………………………………………………………….122 附錄三 參與觀察研究同意書…………………………………………..124 附錄四 親密關係議題清單………………………………..…………….125 附錄五 成人依附特質量表………………………………..…………….126 附錄六 爭吵議題初步調查問卷…………………………….…………130 附錄七 互動向度編碼系統指導手冊中文版.……………………131 附錄八 「成人依附特質量表」使用同意函…………….………148 表 次 表3-1 IDCS各向度之評分者間相關係數………………………………………51 表3-2 IDCS與成人依附特質量表之相關分析………………………………52 表4-1 描述統計與成對樣本t檢定……………………………………………...61 表4-2 男女生各變項與情侶變項之相關矩陣表……………………………63 表4-3 情侶關係變項相關矩陣表…………………………………………………..69 表4-4 對偶資料之個人效果與伴侶效果多層次分析摘要表…………70 表4-5 個人階層與情侶階層之交互作用摘要表…………………………...73 圖 次 圖3-1 本研究架構圖……………………………………………………………….…………43 圖4-1 自己的依附焦慮、情侶目前關係品質對自己在與伴侶互動時 的負向情感之交互作用圖………………………………………………………75 圖4-2 伴侶的依附焦慮、情侶目前關係品質對自己在與伴侶互動時 的負向情感之交互作用圖………………………………………………………76 圖4-3 自己的依附焦慮、情侶目前關係品質對自己在與伴侶互動時 的衝突之交 互作用圖 ……………………………………….…………………78 圖4-4 自己的依附焦慮、情侶目前關係品質對自己在與伴侶互動時 的問題解決技巧之交互作用圖………………………………………………80

    參考文獻
    中文資料
    林佳玲(2000)。夫妻依附風格、衝突因應策略與婚姻滿意度之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。未發表,台北市。
    林以正、黃金蘭、李怡真(2007,投稿中)。「進退之間的拿捏:由忍的情境變異性探討華人自主與和諧的辯證關係」。東西思想文化傳統中的「自我」與「他者」學術研討會(台北)。
    余德慧(1991)。中國社會的人際苦痛及其分析。見高尚仁、楊中芳(主編):中國人、中國心--人格與社會篇,291-362。台北:遠流。
    李敏龍、楊國樞(1998)。中國人的忍:概念分析與實徵研究。本土心理學研究。台北,10期,3-68。
    孫頌賢(2007)。大學生伴侶間人際行為對愛情依附的影響。國立政治大學心理學研究所博士論文。未發表,台北市。
    陳曉維(2004)。成人依戀型態的內隱測量。國立台灣大學心理研究所碩士論文,未發表,台北市。
    陳依芬 (2007)。忍耐策略運用組型對心理適應之影響。國立台灣大學心理研究所碩士論文,未發表,台北市。
    黃囇莉(1998)。忍的心理機制及其轉化。發表於「一九九八年世界心理衛生與輔導會議」,民87年10月,台北:中華心理衛生協會與中國輔導學會合辦。
    黃囇莉(1999)。人際和諧與衝突:本土化的理論與研究。台北:桂冠。
    黃囇莉(2002)。孰可忍?孰不可忍?從現代化的「批判」到本土化的「堅忍」之間。見葉啟政(主編):現代化到本土化,111-135。台北:遠流。
    黃囇莉、鄭琬蓉、黃光國(2007,付印中)。邁向發聲之路:上下關係中「忍」的歷程與自我之轉化。本土心理學研究。
    楊中芳(1991)。詴論中國人的「自己」:理論與研究方向。見楊中芳、高尚仁(主編):中國人、中國心-人格與社會篇,93-145。台北:遠流。
    溫福星(2006)。階層線性模式分析:原理、方法與應用。台北:雙葉。

    英文資料
    Ainsworth, M. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: Apsychological study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
    Bowlby, J.(1969). Attachment and loss: Vol.1.Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
    Bowlby, J.(1973). Attachment and loss: Vol.2.Seperation. New York: Basic Books.
    Bowlby, J.(1980). Attachment and loss: Vol.1.Loss. New York: Basic Books.
    Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.7, 147-178.
    Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226-244.
    Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R.(1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson, & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46-76). New York: The Guilford Press.
    Berman, W. H.,& Sperling, M. B. (1994). The structure and function of adult attachment. In M. B. Sperling, & W. H. Berman(Eds.). Attachment in adults: Clinical and developmental perspectives(pp.3-28). New York: The Guilford Press.
    Capaldi, D. M., Kim, H. K., & Shortt, J. W. (2004). Women's involvement in aggression in young adult romantic relationships: A developmental systems model. In M. Putallez & K. L. Bierman (Eds.), Aggression, antisocial behavior, and violence among girls: A developmental perspective (pp. 223-241). New York: The Guilford Press.
    Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Boldry, J., & Kashy, D. A. (2005). Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: The role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 88 (3), 510-531.
    Campbell, L., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A user-friendly guide. Personal Relationships, 9, 327-342.
    Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A. (2005). The actor-partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development , 29 (2), 101-109.
    Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ,58, 644-663.
    Collins, N. L. (1996). Working models of attachment: Implications for explanation, emotion, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ,71, 810-832.
    Crowell, J. A., Treboux, D., & Waters, E. (1999). The adult attachment interview and the relationship questipnnaire: Relation to reports of mothers and partners. Personal Relationships, 6, 1-18.
    Cassidy, J., & Berlin, L.J. (1994). The insecure/ambivalent pattern of attachment: Theory and research. Child development, 65, 971-981.
    Fraley, R. C., & Waller, N. G. (1998). Adult attachment patterns: A test of the typological model. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 77-114). New York: The Guilford Press.
    Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. (2000). Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions. Review of General Psychology , 4 (2), 132-154.
    Feeney, J., & Noller, P.(1996). Adult attachment. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    Feeney, J. A. (2002). Attachment, marital interaction, and relationship satisfaction: A diary study. Personal Relationships, 9 , 39-55.
    Gelman, A., & Hill, J.(2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Gurung, R. A. R., Sarason, B. R., & Sarason, I. G. (1997). Personal characteristics, relationship quality, and social support perceptions and behavior in young adult romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 319-339.
    Golman, D. (1995) Emotional intelligence. Brockman Inc. 張美蕙譯, 中國時報出版社發行.
    Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511-524.
    Hazan, C., Campa, M., & Gur-Yaish, N.(2006). What is adult attachment? In M. Mikulincer & G. S. Goodman (Eds.), Dynamics of romantic love: Attachment, caregiving, and sex (pp.23-44). New York: The Guildford Press.
    Holmes, J. (1993). John Bowlby and attachment theory. London: Routledge.
    Hwang, K. K. (1977). The dynamic process of coping with interpersonal conflicts in Chinese society. Proceeding of the National Science Council, 2(2), 198-208.
    Julien, D., Markman, H.J., & Lindahl, K.M.(1989). A comparison of a global and a microanalytic coding system: Implications for future trends in studying interactions. Behavioral Assessment, 11, 89-100.
    Kline, G. H., Julien, D., Baucom, B., Hartman, S., Gilbert, K., Gonzales, T.,& Markman, H. J. (2001). The manual of The Interactional Dimensions Coding System-Problem Discussion. University of Denver.
    Kline, G. H., Julien, D., Baucom, B., Hartman, S., Gilbert, K., Gonzales, T.,& Markman, H. J. (2004). The Interactional Dimensions Coding System: A global system for couple interactions. In P. Kerig & D. Baucom (Eds.), Couple observational coding systems. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Davis, K. E.(1994). Attachment style, gender, and relationship stability: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(3), 502-512.
    Kashy, D. A., & Kenny, D.A.(2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 451-477). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: The Guildford Press.
    Kenny, D.A. (1996). Models of interdependence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 279-294.
    Kobak, R. R., & Duemmler, S.(1994). Attachment and conversation: Toward a discourse analysis of adolescent and adult security. In K. Bartholomew & D. Perlman (Eds.), Attachment process in adulthood (pp. 121-149). London: Kingsley.
    Kobak, R. R., & Hazan, C.(1991). Attachment in marriage: Effects of security and accuracy of working models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 861-869.
    Kobak, R. R., Cole, H. E., Ferenz-Gillies, R., Fleming, W. S., & Gamble, W. (1993). Attachment and emotion regulation during motherteen problem solving: A control theory analysis. Child Development, 64, 231-245.
    Kobak, R. R., & Sceery, A.(1988). Attachment in late adolescence: Working models, affect regulation, and representations of self and others. Child Development, 59, 135-146.
    Knox, D. (1971). Marriage happiness: A behavioral approach to counseling. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
    Mikulincer, M., & Nachshon, O. (1991). Attachment styles and patterns of self-disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 321-331.
    Mikulincer, M., Birnbaum, G., Woddis, D., & Nachmias, O. (2000). Stress and accessibility for proximity-related thoughts: Exploring the normative and intraindividual components of attachment theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 509-523.
    Mikulincer, M. (2006). Attachment, caregiving, and sex within romantic relationships: A behavioral system perspective. In M. Mikulincer & G. S. Goodman (Eds.), Dynamics of romantic love: Attachment, caregiving, and sex (pp.23-44). New York: The Guildford Press.
    Mikulincer, M. (1998). Adult attachment style and individual differences in functional versus dysfunctional experiences of anger. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 513-524.
    McFarland C. and Buehler, R. (1997). Negative affective states and the dissociation: The influences of social context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 159-167.
    Pistole, M. C. (1989). Attachment in adult romantic relationships: Style of conflict resolution and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal relationships, 6, 505-510.
    Pennebaker, J. W., Hughes, C. F., & O'Heeron, R. C. (1987). The psychophysiology of
    confession: Linking inhibitory and psychosomatic processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 781-793.
    Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A., & Stevens J. G. (1998). Attachment orientations, social support, and conflict resolution in close relationships. In J. A. Simpson, & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 166-188). New York: The Guilford Press.
    Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A., & Oriña, M. M. (1999). Attachment and anger in an anxiety-provoking situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 940-957.
    Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., & Grich, J. (2001). Adult attachment and the transiton to parenthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 421-435.
    Roisman, G. I., Madsen, S. D., Hennighausen, K. H., Sroufe, L. A., & Collins, W. A. (2001). The coherence of dyadic behavior across parent–child and romantic relationships as mediated by the internalized representation of experience. Attachment & Human Development, 3(2), 156-172.
    Roisman, G. I., Holland, A., Fortuna, K., Fraley, R. C., Clausell, E., & Clarke, A.(2007). The adult attachment interview and self-report of attachment style: An empirical rapprochement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 678-697.
    Rothbard, J. C., & Shaver, P. R.(1994). Continuity of attachment across the life span. In M. B. Sperling, & W. H. Berman(Eds.). Attachment in adults: Clinical and developmental perspectives(pp.31-71). New York: The Guilford Press.
    Shaver, P. R., & Hazan, C. (1988). A Biased overview of the study of love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,5, 473-501.
    Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L.,& Weisberg,Y. J. (2006). Daily perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: The ups and downs of anxiously attached individuals. In M. Mikulincer & G. S. Goodman (Eds.), Dynamics of romantic love: Attachment, Caregiving, and Sex.(pp. 216-239). New York: The Guilford Press.
    Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., & Phillips, D. (1996). Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 71 (5), 899-914.
    Simpson, J. A., Ickes, W., & Grich, J. (1999). When accuracy hurts: reactions of anxious-ambivalent dating partners to a relationship-threatening situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 76, 754-769.
    Simpson, J. A., Winterheld, H. A., Rholes, W. S., & Oriña, M. M. (2007). Working models of attachment and reactions to different forms of caregiving from romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,93(3),466-477.
    Simpson, J. A., Collins, W. A., Tran, S., & Haydon, K. C. (2007). Attachment and the experience and expression of emotions in romantic relationships: A developmental perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,92(2),355-367.
    Simpson, J. A. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ,59 , 971-980.
    Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., & Nelligan J.S.(1992). Support seeking and support giving within couples in an anxiety-proking situation: The role of attachment styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 62 (3), 434-446.

    QR CODE