本研究係以一所新北市國小英語領域推動教師專業學習社群為個案，分析該校英語領域為因應新北市活化課程方案而推動的教師專業學習社群之演進歷程與特性，以及產生的影響，以供其他學校在面對新政策變革時，欲成立教師專業學習社群時的參考。本研究採用現場觀察、訪談與文件分析，並將所蒐集的資料進行相互檢證，以形成研究的發現與結果，依據研究目的與問題獲致研究之結論如下：

一、活化課程政策激發教師組成專業學習社群。
二、分享的文化為熱情國小英語專業學習社群成功運作的關鍵因素。
三、共同願景、合作分享與行政支持為熱情國小教師專業學習社群的支持性條件。
四、熱情國小教師專業學習社群初始階段具有連結需求、建立共同規範與價值觀、積極的實施計畫與倡導型的領導作為之特色。
五、執行階段具有對等、尊重與關懷之關係、分享性領導、同儕壓力與磨合與技術的支持與情感的激勵之實踐行動歷程。
六、社群提升教師專業能力及學生學習動機，且提供初任教師支持環境。
七、專業學習社群任務達成，運作的迫切性不在。

基於上述結論，本研究提出下列建議：

一、對主管教育行政機關的建議
（一）主管教育行政機關宜針對不同學習階段與學習領域建立人才資料庫，讓社群 在規劃講題、講師和教學計畫時，資源能豐沛。
（二）研發完整的教師專業學習社群檢核機制，讓教師的專業成長與學生學習成效的成果得以展現。
（三）經費之補助乃社群成立的誘因之一，可採取競爭性的補助經費，對於教師專業學習社群運作有成效的社群給予差別性的額外補助。

二、對國民小學的建議
（一）對學校行政單位的建議
1.社群成立的任務應定期省思與回顧，訂定出短期、中期與長期發展目標
2.學校行政給予專業學習社群倡導與支持，提升其專業領導知能
3.創設相關誘因與獎勵機制，使社群制度化和常態化
4.增加學校內與外的專業學習社群間交流互動的機會
（二）對教師專業學習社群的建議
1.講題與講師的規劃非分配，而是討論出來的共識
2.找尋出資深與新進教師的需求
3.善用資訊網路平台，將社群的智慧資本得以流轉與累積

三、對後續研究的建議
（一）擴大研究範圍
1.研究範圍朝多重個案及不同層級的學校發展
2.研究對象擴大範圍
（二）轉換研究主題與觀點
1.以「學校文化」的觀點探究
2.以「微觀政治學」的角度探究

This study describes an elementary school’s participation in an English Experimental Program and its implementation of teachers’ professional learning community. The purpose of this study is to provide reference data for other schools by analyzing the project worked and its effects on teachers’ professional competence and students’ achievements in elementary school.
　　
This study’s data is collected by interviewing educational staffs, observing community in an elementary school, and analyzing related documents. The findings of this study are as follows:

I.Teachers’ professional learning community is easier to implement under English Experimental Program policy reform.
II.The key to successful implementation is the culture of sharing.
III.The requirements for implementation include shared vision, collaboration and administrative supports.
IV.During the initial phase of implementation, school has to link the needs, establish norms and values, implement the project with a positive attitude, and develop advocacy leadership.
V.During the execution phase, school has to build an equal, mutually respective, and caring relationship, develop shared leadership, and provide technique support and proper encouragement.
VI.The community has improved teachers’ professional competence and students’ learning motivation, and has also provided a supportive environment for beginning teachers.
VII.The community would face difficulties as it accomplished the mission and there would be no need for community.

　　According to the findings of this study, there are some suggestions for elementary schools, intended schools or teachers and future studies.

壹、中文部分

丁琴芳（2007）。國民小學教師專業學習社群發展之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文，未出版。
方文智（2004）。國民小學知識社群之研究---以嘉義縣為例。國立中正大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
江怡萱（2007）。國小學習型教師社群建立教學檔案之研究-以社會學習領域為主題。國立臺東大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
池榮尉（2004）。國民小學教師團隊發展歷程之研究─以啄木鳥教師團隊為例。(碩士論文)。2010年9 月1 日，取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22092CYCU5331007%22.&searchmode=basic
吳百祿(2009)。教師領導：理念、實施、與啟示。國民教育研究學報，23，53-80。
李子建（2006）。前言：教師領導、專業學習社群和夥伴協作。基礎教育學報，15（2），39-43。
沈靜濤（2008）。教師專業發展評鑑與專業學習社群之個案研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
林永發（2010）。從校本課程到高瞻計畫－麗山高中專業學習社群的經驗分享。中等教育，61（2），152-165。
林劭仁（2006）。專業學習社群運用於師資培育自我評鑑之探究。中正教育研究，5（2），79-111。
林宏達（2010）。教師專業學習社群的發展概述－以美國德州經驗為例。中等教育，61（2），166-177。
林佳鈴（2010）。教務主任以轉型領導促進學校專業學習社群發展之個案研究─以推動閱讀為例。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
林忠仁（2009）。國民小學校長分佈領導、灰猩猩效應與教師專業學習社群關係之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文，未出版。
林偉文(2002)。國民中小學學校組織文化、教師創意教學潛能與創意教學之關係。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文，未出版。
林瑞昌(2006)。以專業社群概念內涵為核心的教師專業發展策略。載於歐用生（主編），熱情卓越新典範（67-76頁）。臺北市：國立臺北教育大學。
倪惠軒（2010）。國民小學教師專業學習社群個案研究－以彩虹國小為例。國立新竹教育大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
孫志麟 (2008)。專業學習社群：促進教師專業發展的平臺。國立中興大學九十七學年度「教師專業發展學術研討會」專題演講文章。
徐碧君（2010）。臺灣地區教學卓越幼稚園創新經營、組織承諾、教師專業社群及教學效能之研究。國立新竹教育大學教育學系博士論文，未出版。
高博銓（2008）。學校學習社群的發展與挑戰。中等教育，59（4），8-20。
高傳晃（2009）。臺北市國民小學校長領導行為與教師專業學習社群關係之研究。臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所碩士論文，未出版。
張國強（2009）。臺中縣國民小學校長教學領導與教師專業學習社群互動之相關研究。國立臺中教育大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
張淑珠（2007）。輔導員學習社群專業發展之研究—以彰化縣九年一貫課程與教學輔導團為例。東海大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
張新仁、王瓊珠、馮莉雅編(2010)。中小學教師專業學習社群手冊（再版）。臺北市：教育部。
張德銳（2010）。喚醒沈睡的巨人－論教師領導在我國中小學的發展。臺北市立教育大學學報，41（2），81-110。
張德銳、高紅瑛（2009）。同儕輔導：專業成長故事集。臺北市：五南。
張德銳等（2004）。教學檔案：促進教師專業發展。臺北市：高等教育。
梁靜旻（2011）。國小教師運作英語專業學習社群之研究---以臺中市快樂國小為例。靜宜大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
莊筱玉(2005)。教師專業知識建構、轉化及發展之研究－一位技術學院英文教師的個案研究。屏東教育大學教育行政研究所博士論文，未出版。
郭木山(2002)。國民小學學校本位教師專業發展之個案研究－以一個教師社群協同反省的行動研究為例。國立臺中師範學院國民教育所碩士論文，未出版。
陳如意（2009）。臺北縣國民小學教師學習社群之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文，未出版。
陳佩英（2009）。一起學習、一起領導：專業學習社群的建構與實踐。中等教育，60（3），68-88。
陳佩英、焦傳金（2009）。分散式領導與專業學習社群之建構。師大教育學報。
陳建順（ 2005 ）。「專業學習社群計劃」。2010 年9 月1 日， 取自http://ihouse.hkedcity.net/~iw1160/ws_050616_pro_learning_comm.htm
陳雅智（1997）。國中理化教師的行動研究：專業改變與學習社群。國立高雄師範大學科學教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
童新峯（2011）。專業學習社群運作及其促進學校文化改變之個案研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育政策與行政研究所碩士論文，未出版。
馮鈺娟（2009）。臺中市國民小學校長知識領導與教師專業學習社群態度關係之研究。國立臺中教育大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
楊玲珠（2009）。臺北市中小學教務主任教學領導行為與教師專業學習社群關係之研究。臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所學校行政碩士論文，未出版。
楊振富（譯）（2002）。Peter Senge著。學習型學校：第五項修練教育篇—獻給教育工作者父母以及關心教育的每個人（Schools that learn : a fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education）。臺北：天下遠見。
楊智先（2007）教師社群互動、工作希望感受與創造性轉化之關係：量化模式建構與典範案例分析。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文，未出版。
溫麗琪、賴美嬌（2003）。學習社群之定義、特性及其應用。華麗社會人文學報，8，29-36。
新北市99學年度「活化課程實驗方案」修正計畫。2010 年9月10日， 取自http://163.20.103.7/web97/101/教學組放置在學校首頁的資料/新北市99學年度「活化課程實驗方案」修正計畫.pdf
劉慶生（2006）。建構「國文科教師專業社群」之行動研究。輔仁大學教育領導與發展研究所碩士論文，未出版。
歐用生(1995)。教師成長與學習。臺北市:臺灣省國民學校教師研習會。
歐用生（1996）。教師專業發展。臺北：師大書苑
歐志昌（2003）。網路學習社群對數學教師專業能力提升之研究。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
潘慧玲、王麗雲、簡茂發、孫志麟、張素貞、張錫勳、陳順和(2004)。發展國民中小學教師教學專業能力指標之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究中心。
蕭英勵（2002）。學習社群對於推動九年一貫課程的省思。中等教育，53（5），100-111。
貳、西文部分

Barth, R. S. (1990). Improving schools from within. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Barth, R. S. (2001). Teacher leader. Phi Delta Kappa, 82(6) , 443-449.
Bunker, V. J. (2008). Professional larning cmmunities,teacher collaboration,and student achievement in an era of standards based reform. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,Lewis and Clark College.
Cheng, H. (2004).Teacher learning about and with technology:Sharing,support,and strtching through a professional learning community. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, Michigan.
Fellow, S. A. (2005) . An investigation of teachers’ perceptions of their schools as professional learning communities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hartford,Connecticut.
Croasmun, J. (2007).The impact of a professional learning community on student achievement gains: A case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC.
Crowther, F., Kaagan, S. S., Ferguson, M., & Hann, L. (2002). Developing teacher leaders: How teacher leadership enhances school success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Dillon-Peterson, B. (1986). Trusting teachers to know what is good for them. In K. Zumwalt (Ed.), Improving teachers (pp.24-36). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
DuFour, R. , & Eaker, R.(1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practice for enhancing student achievement. Reston, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
DuFour, R. (2004).What is a professional learning community? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6-11.
DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2006). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Engel , D. E. (1990). Pittsburgh’s teacher-administrator partnership: A new relationship. Educational Leadership, 47(8), 44-45.
Fielding, G., & Schalock, H. (1985). Promoting the professional development of teachers and administrators. Eugene, OR: Center for Educational Policy and Management.
Fullan, M. G. (2001). The New Meaning of Educational Change. (3rd ed.). New York
Fusco,M.A.(2001).The study of shaping organizational culture and providing structures to support professional learning communities in elementary schools.Unpublished doctoral dissertation,University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Garvin, D. A. (1994). Building a learning organization. Business credit, 96(1), 19-19. http://search.proquest.com/docview/230156476?accountid=14228
Goldsmith, M., & Beckhard, R. (Eds.), The leader of the future (pp.149-159). SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.
Graham, P. (2007). Improving Teacher Effectiveness through Structured Collaboration: A Case Study of a Professional Learning Community. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ801113)
Harris, A. (2002). School Improvement: What’s in it for schools？Routledge：London.
Hart, A. W. (1995). Reconceiving school leadership: Emergent view. The Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 9-28.
Hipp, K.A. & Huffman, J.B. (2008). Sustaining professional learning communities: Case Studies. Journal of Educational Change, 9:173–195.
Hord, M. S. (1997). Professional Learning Communities: Communities of Continuous Inquiry and Improvement. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
Hord, S. M., & Sommers, W. A. (2008). Leading professional learning communities: Voices from research and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Hord,S.M.(2004).Professional learning communities:An overview.In S.M.Hord(Ed.) , Learning together, leading together leading together :Changing school through professional learning communities(pp.5-14).NY : Teachers College Press.
Huffman, J. B. (2009). Sustaining Professional Learning Communities: Case Studies. Journal of Educational Change, 9(2), 173-195.
Huffman, J. B., & Hipp, K. K. (2003). Reculturing schools as professional learning communities. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
Hughes, T. A. & Kritsonis, W. A. (2006). A national perspective: an exploration of professional learning communities and the impact on school improvement efforts. National Journal for Publishing and Mentoring Doctoral Student Research, 1(1), 1-12.
Johnson, D., & Johnson, F. (2008). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (10th ed.). Boston: Alley and Bacon.
Keedy, J. L. (1999). Examining teacher instructional leadership within the small group dynamics of collegial groups. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(7), 785-799.
Kruse & Louis (1995). Developing professional community in New & Restructuring Urban Schools. in K. S. Louis, S. D. Kruse, & et al.. Professionalism and community: perspectives on reforming urban schools. (pp. 187-207). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
Kruse, S. D., Louis, K. S. , & Bryk, A. (1995). An emerging framework for analyzing school-based professional community. In K. S. Louis, & S.D. Kruse (Eds.), Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools (pp.23-42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Lambert, L. (2003). Leadership capacity for lasting school improvement. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Lashway, L. (1997). Leading with vision. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educa tional Management.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leithwood, K., Jantzi,D., &Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times.Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Linder, R. A., Post, G., & Calabrese, K. (2012). Professional learning communities: Practices for successful implementation. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 78(3), 13-22.
Little, J. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teacher's professional　relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509-536.
Little, J. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teacher's professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509-536
Louis, K. S., Kruse, S., & Raywid, M. A. (1996). Putting teachers at the center of reform: Learning schools and professional communities. National Association of Secondary School Principals, 80(580), 9-21.
Louis, K.S., & Kruse, S.D. (1995). Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Martin-Kniep, G. O. (1999). Capturing the wisdom of practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
McCay, L., Flora, J., Hamilton, A., & Riley, J. F. (2001). Reforming schools through teacher leadership: A program for classroom teachers as agents of change. Educational Horizons, 79(3), 135-142.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Murphy, J. (2005). Connecting teacher leadership and school improvement. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
Newll,G.,Wilsman,M,Langenfeld,M.,&Mclntosh,A. (2002).Online profession development: Sustained learning with prieds . Teaching Children Mathematics,8,505-509.
Newmann, F.,M., & Wehlage, G.,G. (1995). Successful school restructuring: A report to the public and educators American Federation of Teachers, National Associatio(TRUNCATED). http://search.proquest.com/docview/62643471?accountid=14228
Odell, S. J. (1997). Preparing teachers for teacher leadership. Action in Teacher Education, 19(3), 120-124.
Roberts, S. M. , & Pruitt, E. Z. (2003). Schools as professional learning communities: collaborative activities and strategies for professional development. Thoudand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
Senge, P. (1994). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency Doubleday.
Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A.(2000). Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education. New York: Doubleday.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (2000). The lifeworld of leadership: Creating culture, community,and personal meaning in our schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Shalley, C. E., & Perry-Smith, J. E.(2001). Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: The role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84, 1-22.
Sigurðardóttir, A. (2010). Professional learning Community in relation to school effectiveness . Scandinavian Journal Of Educational Research, 54(5), 395-412.
Smylie, M. A. (1995). New perspectives on teacher leadership. The Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 3-7.
Smyser, S. O. (1995). Developing the teacher leader. Teacher Education, 31(2), 130-137.
Snow-Gerono, J. L. (2005). Professional development in a culture of inquiry:PDS teachers identify the benefits of professional learning communities.Teaching and Teacher Education,21(3),241-256.
Spark, D. ,& Hirsh, S. (1997). A new vision for staff development. Alexandria, VA:
Speck, M. (1999). The principalship: Building a learning community. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Supovitz, J., A., & Christman, J. B. (2003). Developing communities of instructional practice: Lessons from cincinnati and philadelphia. CPRE policy briefs. RB-39.Consortium for Policy Research in Education. University of Pennsylvania. Web site: http://search.proquest.com/docview/62000382?accountid=14228
Walters, S., & Guthro, C. (1992). Leading, learning, and leaving. In C. Livingston (Ed.), Teachers as leaders: Evolving roles (pp. 131-155). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
Whitaker, K. S. (1997). Developing teacher leadership and the management team concept: A case study. Teacher Education, 33(1), 1-16.
Wildman, T., & Niles, J. (1987). Essentials of professional growth. Educational Leadership , 44(5), 4-10.
York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74 (3), 255-316.
York-Barr, J., Sommers, W. A., Ghere, G. S., & Montie, J. (2001). Reflective practice to improve school: An action guide for educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin