跨越性取向的校園對話：
技專女同志學生性取向認同發展與校園同異互動經驗之研究
摘要
本研究旨在探討高等教育校園脈絡中女同志學生性取向認同發展，並依據校園環境的理論觀點，從同異互動的角度切入，理解不同觀點同異互動經驗與女同志學生性取向認同發展之關係。研究發問如下：(一)高等教育女同志學生之性取向認同發展歷程與內涵為何？(二)高等教育女同志學生主觀的校園同異互動經驗為何？(三)高等教育異性戀學生對女同志學生，於校園同異互動之主觀經驗為何？(四)高等教育異性戀教師對女同志學生，於校園同異互動之主觀經驗為何？
本研究採社會建構論的觀點，以質化研究取徑，透過參與觀察、深度訪談，並輔以焦點團體，以北部某技術學院女同志學生及與其有互動經驗的異性戀師生為研究對象，共訪問十一位女同志學生、八位異性戀女學生、五位異性戀教師及一次12人的焦點團體，以紮根理論作為資料分析策略。研究發現如下：
一、女同志學生性取向認同歷程與內涵：
(一)女同志學生性取向認同發展歷程有其階段性，階段間具循環特
性，屬非線性模式。
(二)女同志學生性取向認同發展具流動性及多樣性，除了認同自己是
同性戀外，也包含雙性戀認同。
(三)女同志學生必須先有同性戀的概念，才會產生同性戀認同的覺
察。
(四)告白代表向自己現身，是女同志學生發展同性戀認同的重要關鍵
事件。
(五)內化同性戀恐懼症阻礙女同志學生性取向認同，形成自傷行為。
(六)因同性戀污名的影響，女同志學生衣櫃風險的權衡大都來自對他
人態度的想像，污名處理結果影響內化恐同的嚴重程度。
(七)相較於國小、國中校園，技專女校校園，是較能接納女同志學生
的友善環境，可減緩女同志學生內化的恐同。
(八)女同志學生T婆角色的扮演，從「學習圈內文化」、「伴侶相處
的協調」與「性生活展現」三大面向進行試探、提議、討價還價
與翻轉的可能。
二、女同志學生主觀的校園同異互動經驗
透過Moos社會氣氛理論分析，以物理環境、組織因素、群體共同特質與社會氣氛四個面向的討論，可清楚呈現女同志學生校園同異互動的主觀經驗及性取向發展的需求。
(一)物理環境：女同志學生面對緊密的宿舍衣櫃，她們花去大部分的
時間與精力，因應宿舍物理環境所形成的人/我互動的干擾，並
採取空間管理及人際管理兩大因應策略，以能同時滿足安全感及
性取向認同。
(二)組織因素：除宿舍物理環境的因素，使宿舍空間成為透明的衣櫃
外，也不可忽略父權體制下女生宿舍，學校以代理父權之責進行
情慾監控。研究場域開設同志議題課程，對同志議題，漸漸從保
守傳統走向接納，是組織改變及革新的一大步。但授課教師面臨
主流異性戀主義抗拒及缺乏資源的困擾。
(三)群體共同特質：女同志學生從社團中找到歸屬，營造的群體共同
特質讓女同志學生感受與社團環境的適配，就如家一樣的溫暖。
雖運動型社團較能接納同志性取向，但並非所有女同志學生都對
運動型社團有興趣。
(四)校園氣氛：女同志學生進入學校場域後，校園女同志現身，傳達
整體校園環境對同志族群的友善態度，讓女同志學生可因全體住
宿的生活，暫時拋開家庭衣櫃的束縛，自在的探索性取向。
三、異性戀女學生對女同志學生，於校園同異互動之主觀經驗
(一)異性戀女學生初接觸女同志學生的反應，包括「拒絕、嫌惡，感
覺不舒服」、「震驚、害怕，而堅拒自己成為同志」、「容忍，
但期待她變回異性戀」、「支持，並視同志是常見也是正常」。
(二)異性戀女學生與女同志學生接觸內涵及多次接觸經驗，是改變對
同志族群偏見的重要因素。
(三)友誼關係的延續與鞏固，是異性戀同儕走向對同志族群涵化態度
的途徑。
(四)校園恐同的氣氛影響友誼關係建立，阻礙對同志族群正向態度的
發展。
四、異性戀教師對女同志學生，於校園同異互動之主觀經驗
(一)異性戀教師與女同志學生邂逅歷程：從「看不見到遠距離觀
望」、「試圖接觸」到「暫時擱置異性戀主義，開始對話」。
(二)異性戀教師難啟動與女同志學生的對話，而以遠距離觀望及試圖
接觸的方式，卻傳達異性戀主義的恐同氛圍，讓女同志學生離得
更遠，而暫時擱置異性戀主義，才有機會與女同志學生展開對
話。
(三)異性戀教師面臨異性戀主義的衝突與掙扎，而掙扎是貼近女同志
學生的契機，但也因異性戀主義形成「假性同性戀」及「不鼓勵
也不反對」的迷思，而形成師生關係的疏離。
(四)異性戀教師深受異性戀主義所困擾，困擾的來源，除了自身根深
蒂固的意識型態外，校園環境(異性戀教師同儕、異性戀學生及
整體學校價值)及社會(家長的期待)的異性戀主義，不但阻斷稍
有鬆動的異性戀預設，更強化原有的異性戀主義。
依據研究發現，本研究結果與討論，提出以下四點結論：
(一)女同志學生性取向發展，是確認與再確認的循環歷程；
(二)學校是家也是枷；
(三)交融與疏離的同儕同異互動關係；
(四)難以貼近，有距離的師生關係。本研究亦根據上述研究結果，針
對國家政策、高等教育學生事務工作、多元文化校園方案及進一
步研究提出具體建議。
關鍵字：女同志學生、性取向認同、校園同異互動經驗、容忍與
涵化、異性戀主義、適配

Dialogues on Campus beyond Sexual identity: The Development of Sexual Identity of Lesbian Students in Institute of Technology and the Experience of Lesbians and Heterosexuals Interaction on Campus

Hsing-Yuan Liu

Abstract

The study was a qualitative research, which was based on the perspective of social construction theory. By means of participant observation, in-depth interview and focus group, the researcher studied the lesbian students of an institute of technology in northern Taiwan and heterosexual teachers and students who had interacted with these lesbian students as the research targets. The participants of the study consisted of 11 lesbian students, 8 heterosexual female students, 5 heterosexual teachers and a focus group of 12 people. The strategy of data analysis was based on grounded theory. The research findings are:
1. The process and content of development in the sexual identity of lesbian students:
(1) The development of the sexual identity of lesbian students is formed in sequential stages; however, these stages are of circular rather than linear model.
(2) The development of sexual orientation identification of lesbian students is fluctuant and diverse. The lesbian students identify not only with homosexuality but also with bisexual identity.
(3) The lesbian students must have the concept of homosexuality, then could become aware of the homosexual identity.
(4) The declaration of their identities to themselves is the crucial incident when lesbian students develop homosexual identity.
(5) Internalized homophobia hinders lesbian students’ sexual identity and results in self-injurious behaviors.
(6) Due to the effect of stigma of homosexuality, the lesbian students’ weighting consideration of the closet risk derives from their imagination of others’ attitude. The results of dealing with the stigma influence the degree of internalized homophobia.
(7) Comparing to elementary schools and junior high schools, the campus of women’s technology institute is a friendly environment, which is more likely to accept lesbian students. The lesbian students’ internalized homophobia can thus be reduced.
(8) In order to role play the Butch-Femme, the lesbian students proceed with exploration, negotiation, bargain and reverse from three dimensions of “learning of the lesbian culture”, “compatibility with the partners” and “expression of sexual life”.
2. Lesbian students’ subjective experience of lesbian and heterosexual interaction on campus:
The discussion of four dimensions of physical environments, organizational environments, human aggregates and social climates of the analysis of Moos’ theory of social climate can clearly express lesbian students’ subjective experience of lesbian and heterosexual interaction on campus and the needs of development in sexual identity.
(1) Physical environment: When facing the tight closets of the dormitory, the lesbian students spend most of the time and energy responding to the interference of human/self interaction in the physical environment and employ space management and interpersonal management as the strategies to fulfill both the sense of security and sexual identity.
(2) Organizational environment: The physical environment of the dormitory transforms the space into a transparent closet. Besides, one should also consider the point that under the system of patriarchy, the school proceeds with the supervision of sexual passion in female dormitory on behalf of patriarchy. The research school hosts the courses in the issue of homosexuality, and gradually accepts the related issues from the previous conservative attitude. It is a big step for organizational change and reformation. However, the teachers of these courses still face the resistance of mainstream heterosexuals and the lack of resources.
(3) Human aggregates: The lesbian students experience the sense of belonging in the sports clubs, which are warm as their homes. Although sports clubs are more likely to accept the lesbians’ sexual identity, not all lesbian students are interested in sports clubs.
(4) Campus climates: After entering the schools, due to the coming out of the lesbians on campus and the campus’ friendly attitude toward lesbians, the lesbian students can temporarily release from the constraint of family closet and freely explore their sexual identity in the lives with groups.
3. Heterosexual female students’ subjective experience on their interaction with lesbian students on campus
(1) The heterosexual female students’ initial reaction toward lesbian students includes “refusal, disgust and uneasiness, “being shocked, afraid and refusal to become lesbians”, “being tolerant but expect lesbians to become heterosexual” and “being supportive and regarding lesbians as common and normal group”.
(2) The contact and continued contact experiences of heterosexual female students’ with lesbian students are the crucial factors to change their prejudice toward homosexual group.
(3) The continuity and firmness of friendship are the paths of the heterosexual group’s nurturance attitude toward homosexual group.
(4) The homophobia climate on campus affects the establishment of friendship with the lesbians and hinders the development of positive attitude toward homosexual group.
4. Heterosexual teachers’ subjective experience on their interaction with lesbian students on campus
(1) The process of the contact between heterosexual teachers and lesbian students are: from“ being invisible to seeing with far distance”, “attempting to contact with each other” to “temporarily hanging over the heterosexism and starting to have dialogues”.
(2) The heterosexual teachers have difficulty to initiate dialogues with lesbian students.The seeing from long distance and attempt of contact result in the climate of homophobia of heterosexism, which isolates lesbian students. Only temporarily hanging over the heterosexism can make the heterosexual teachers start to have dialogue with lesbian students.
(3) The heterosexual teachers face the conflict and struggle with the heterosexism. However, the struggle is the starting point to be close to lesbian students, the heterosexism also makes the teachers become the myth of “pseudo-homosexual” and “not encouraging and not opposing” which result in the distance between the teachers and lesbian students.
(4) The heterosexual teachers are profoundly disturbed by heterosexism. The factors include in their own long-standing ideology, the environment of the school (colleagues of heterosexual teachers, heterosexual students and the school-wide values) and heterosexism of the society (the parents’ expectation). These factors not only hinder the slightly fluctuated assumption of heterosexism but also reinforce the original heterosexism.
Based upon the research finding and discussion, the researcher proposes the following four conclusions: (1) The development of lesbian students’ sexual orientation is the circular process of confirmation and reconfirmation (2) The school resemble both of the family and the pillory. (3) Compatible and isolation lesbian and heterosexual student interaction. (4) Hard and distant relationship between heterosexual teachers and lesbian students.
Based on the conclusions, the concrete recommendations for national policies, student affair of higher education, the program of multicultural on campus and the further studies are presented.

Keywords: lesbian student, sexual identity, experience of lesbian and heterosexual interaction on campus, tolerance and nurturance, heterosexism, congruence

參考文獻
一、中文部分：
小稀（1996）。佛教反對同性戀嗎？。女朋友，14，27。
王作方（1995）。活在愛滋的陰影裏—台灣地區男同性戀者的生活經
驗及對愛滋病與防治的感受。國防醫學院公共衛生學研究所碩士
論文，未出版，台北。
王思萍（2003）。從「107號房」到同志文化研究社—女同志認同、
現身與同志學生社團的關係。國立高雄師範大學性別教育研究所
碩士論文，未出版，高雄。
王雅各（1999）。台灣男同志平權運動史。台北：開心陽光。
王皓薇（1997）。不要交出遙控器：同志要有「現身」自主權。騷
動，3（1），52-58。
王儷靜（2002，9月）。教學原理教科書裡的性別訊息：What is
not said and what is said。發表於高雄市，女性學學會，高
雄醫學大學性別研究所聯合舉辦之「檢視檢視大專教科書性別意
識研討會」，高雄。
尤俠（1998）。父權化石：男性集體意識形態所形成的結晶體。台
北：探索。
毛衛中、江漢光（1995）。同性戀的生物醫學觀。醫學繼續教育，5
(6)，60-67。
台大女同性戀文化研究社（1995）。我們是女同性戀。台北：碩人。
古玉英（2003）。國小啟聰班國語科教科書性別角色之內容分析。國
立臺東大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺東。
白先勇（1999）。孽子。台北：允晨。
卡維波、何春蕤（1990）。為什麼他們不告訴你。台北 : 方智。
多可特、inmind、小均、小杰、小草、阿正、維尼、歐克夏、台大浪
達社（2004）。認識同志手冊。台灣同志諮詢熱線。
同志代課－吹皺校園一池春水（2001，3月23日）。自由時報，13
版。
何英奇（1985）。我國大學生次級文化及其相關因素之研究。國立台
灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文，未出版，台北。
何春蕤（1994）。豪爽女人：女性主義與性解放。台北：皇冠。
何春蕤、甯應斌（1997）。邁向多元文化視野下的性／別教育。論文
發表於多元文化教育的理論與實踐國際學術研討會，台北：台灣
師範大學教育學系。
朱偉誠（1998）。台灣同志運動的後殖民思考：論「現身」問題。台
灣社會研究季刊，30（6），35-62。
吳幸珍（2004）。性別教育外一章：三個國中女同性戀學生的故事。
國立臺灣師範大學公民教育活動領導研究所教學碩士論文，出
版：台北。
吳清山（2001）。初等教育。台北：五南。
吳雅玲（2002）。檢視國中英語科教科書是否符合性別平等原則。兩
性平等教育季刊，18，92-100。
吳鳳雪（1994）。解讀媒介中的同性戀意涵:以1983-1993年的報紙為
例。銘傳管理學院大眾傳播研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
吳翠松（1998）。報紙中的同志--十五年來同性戀議題報導的解析。
文化大學新聞學系研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
吳嘉麗（1998）。從性別角度看國中數理化教科書。兩性平等教育季刊，2，58-65。
吳嘉麗（1999）。跳脫性別框框。台北：女書。
呂愛珍（2000）。初等教育。台北市: 五南。
柯乃熒（1994）。自我效力、自覺愛滋病威脅及性行為之相關南臺灣
108例男同性戀分析。高雄醫學院護理學研究所碩士論文，未出
版，高雄。
柯乃熒、鍾信心、章順仁、葛應欽（1996）。自我效力、自覺愛滋病
威脅及其性行為之相關--南臺灣108例男同性戀之分析。護理研
究，4（3），285-297。
柯乃熒、鍾信心、章順仁、葛應欽、文榮光（1995）。男同性戀、愛
滋病威脅與性行為之探索研究。臺灣性學學刊，1（1），33-
46。
邱啟新（2001）。發現塗鴉：公共塗鴉的空間與文化意涵研究。國立
臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
周華山（1995）。同志論。香港：香港同志研究社。
周華山（1997）。後殖民同志。香港：香港同志研究社。
林碧雲（2000）。字在說話--從國小社會科教科書（4-6冊）檢視教
科書中兩性的不平衡。兩性平等教育季刊，12，102-106。
林賢修（1997）。看見同性戀。台北：開心陽光。
林燕卿、周勵志（1996）。評估愛滋病防治教育對男同性戀學生之健
康行為傾向的效果。中華心理衛生學刊，9（1），11-26。
林曉芳（2004）。E世代青少年對同性戀的多元文化觀，嶺東學報，
15，95-128。
紀大偉（1997）。酷兒啟示錄。台北市：元尊。
胡幼慧、姚美華（1996）。一些質性研究方法上的思考。載於胡幼慧
（主編），質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例（頁141-
158）。台北：巨流。
胡幼慧主編（1996）。質性研究：理論方法及本土女性研究實例。台
北：巨流。
唐文慧（2001）。從不鼓勵也不反對談起：在校園籌組同志社團，兩
性平等季刊，15，109-111。
徐宗國（1994）。紮根理論研究法：淵源、原則、技術與涵義。香港
社會科學學報，4，194-221。
馬嘉蘭（1998）。衣櫃，面具，膜： 當代臺灣論述中同性戀主體的
隱／現邏輯。
中外文學，26（12），130-149。
陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究。台北：五南。
陳建涵（2003）。「看見」同志運動－－同志團體的多元發展與參
政。國立成功大學政治經濟學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南。
陳微君（2002）。台灣兩性平等教育政策性別意涵之變遷－從同志平
權運動談起。暨南國際大學教育政策與行政研究所碩士論文，未
出版，南投。
陳錦華（2001）。網路社會運動：以本土同志運動在網上的集結與動
員為例。國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
陳麗如（2000）。她們的故事：七個女同志的認同歷程。國立屏東師
範學院教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文，未出版，屏東。
張宏誠（2002）。同性戀者權利平等保障之憲法基礎。台北：學林文
化。
張明敏、楊家羚、林昱貞（2003）。性取向污明知建制、抗拒與轉
化—一次同志教育的教學實踐。發表於台灣女性學學會、清華大
學舉辦「意識、認同、實踐」2003年女性主義學術研討會，新竹
清華大學。
張玨（1999）。性教育／兩性教育／性別教育／兩性平等教育。兩性
平等教育季刊，7，17-23。
張芬芬（2002）質性研究的評鑑規準：各派主張與發展趨勢。初等教
育學刊，12，301-351。
張盈（2001）。在教育場域中實踐基進民主-以同志教師身份認同
與抗拒實踐為例。台灣教育社會學研究，1(2)，131-169。
張酒雄、李長燦、 許家驊、張鈺珮、鍾邦友(1999)。高雄地區大學
校院導師制度之研究。教育學刊，15，261-315。
張娟芬（1997）。同女出走。台北：女書。
張娟芬（1998）。姊妹戲牆。台北：聯合文學。
張娟芬（2001）。女同志故事書。台北：時報。
張雪梅（1996）。學生發展—學生事務工作的理論與實務。台北：張
老師。
張喬婷（2000）。馴服與抵抗：十位校園女菁英拉子的情慾壓抑。台
北：唐山。
張騄遠（1993）。輔導人員對同性戀的態度研究。民意研究季刊，
186，10-67。
教育部（2002）。高等教育法規選輯。台北：教育部。
教育部（2004）。性別教育平等法。2004年12月19日，取自
http://law.moj.gov.tw/Scripts/Newsdetail.asp?
NO=1H0080501
畢恆達（2000）。從兩性平等到性別平等：記葉永鋕。兩性平等教育
季刊，13，21-34。
畢恆達（2001）。空間就是權力。台北：心靈工坊。
畢恆達（2003）。男同性戀與父母：現身的考量、策略、時機與後
果，女學學誌：婦女與性別研究，15，37-78。
強淑敏（1999）。我們是同性戀教師。臺東師範學院國民教育研究所
碩士論文，未出版，台北。
郭麗安、王釋逸、張歆佑（2000）。大學生同志身份的認同研究。台
灣歷史文化研討論會：性別與文化論研討論文集，未出版，高
雄。
黃乙軒（2003）。學生宿舍寢室空間群體生活的人/我衝突與調節。
國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
黃玉（2004）。E世代多元背景大學生校園經驗與心理社會、認知發
展歷程。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(NSC92-
2413-H-003-008)。台北市：國立台灣師範大學公民教育與活動
領導學系。
黃玉（2005）。大學學生事務的理論與應用。載於陳伯璋、蓋浙生
（主編），新世紀高等教職政策與行政（頁395-470）。臺北市：
高等教育。
黃美雯（1999）。不同年齡層學生對童話繪本中友誼概念之詮釋研
究。彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化。
黃婉君（1998）。國小新版國語科教科書性別意識形態之內容分析研
究。兩性平等教育季刊，5，26-37。
黃楚雄（1998）。後異性戀革命。台北：旺角。
窗外，可有藍天(1994，8月2日）。中國時報，十八版。
雲的騷動（1999）。「網路、社團與白色恐怖」。女朋友，28，17。
游美惠（1999）。性／別平權教育與女性主義的社會學分析。兩性平
等教育季刊，7，32-51。
游美惠（2002）。身體、性別與性教育：女性主義的觀點。女學學
誌：婦女與性別研究，14，81-118。
游美惠（2004）。同性戀恐懼症。兩性平等教育季刊，25，120-
122。
喀飛（2002）。從「墜樓事件」新聞中看媒體對同志的報導態度。載
於謝臥龍（主編），性別：解讀與跨越（頁129-143）。台北：
五南。
華梵油襪子Eros社（1997）。「穿Eros襪子在腳上」。女朋友，15，
7。
粟慧文（2003）。國小教科書性別角色內容分析：以語文領域為例。
國立新竹師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹。
楊佳羚（2002）。國中性教育的人類學初探。清華大學人類學研究所
碩士論文，未出版，新竹。
楊桂華（2004，3月4日）：同志學生：被罰抄金剛經。蘋果日報。
溫春福（1994）。技職教育院校實施實務專題式導師制之可行性，訓
育研究，33(2)，51-58。
溫春福（1995）。導師制在通是教育方面之角色功能。教育資料之文
摘，35(3)，117-134。
趙雨龍、黃昌榮、趙維生（2003）。充權-新社會工作視界。台北：
五南。
趙彥寧（1996）。性、性意識與身體建構：形塑台灣女同性戀的身體
美學。發表於第一屆『性教育、性學、性別暨同性戀研究』國際
學術研討會。中壢：中央大學性/別研究室。
趙彥寧（2001）。帶著草帽到處旅行。台北：巨流。
廖國寶（1997）。台灣男同志的家庭與婚姻─從傳統婚姻壓力談起。
國立臺灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
劉安真（2001）。女同志性認同形成歷程與污名處理之分析研究。國
立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
劉安真（2002）。從多元文化觀點談同志肯定諮商。輔導季刊，38
（4），6-15。
劉杏元、孔德（2002）。聆聽彩虹國度的聲音：技專女同志學生次文
化與其性別認定歷程初探。學生事務，41（4），63-73。
劉杏元、孔德（2003）。技專女同志學生性取向認定歷程與其校園氣
氛初探。學生事務與社團輔導：社團學第四輯，東吳大學課外活
動組。
劉杏元（2004）。是不交會的平行線還是親密的教育夥伴：開創學生
事務的教育夥伴關係以提昇學生學習。學生事務，43(4)，50-6
2。
劉杏元、林曉玲（2005）。性別與多元文化。載於洪泉湖（主編），
台灣的多元文化（頁89-132）。臺北市：五南。
劉欣蓉（1992）。女生宿舍。中國論壇，36（6），81-83。
劉苓莉（1997）。兒童對童話中「友誼概念」之詮釋─以《青蛙和蟾
蜍》為例。國立嘉義師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出
版，嘉義。
鄭美里（1997）。女兒國：台灣女同志的性別、家庭與圈內生活。台
北：女書文化。
鄭敏慧（1998）。女同志網站的一些側寫。性別與空間研究通訊，
5，135-144。
鄭學庸、Tama（1998）。「Take That，Take What」。同言無忌，
10，37。
潘慧玲（2003）。社會科學典範的流變。教育研究資訊，11（1），
115-143。
「學生染愛滋作處置！教師同性戀又該怎麼辦？」（1988，8月20
日）。聯合報，11版。
學校同性戀社團招募社員 華梵技術學院掃蕩傳單 同志不平（1996，
10月1日）。聯合報，5版。
賴至巧（2004年12月15日）。同志一家親：同性戀納入性別課程。民
生報。2004年12月15日，取自
http://law.moj.gov.tw/Scripts/Newsdetail.asp?
NO=1H0080501
賴鈺麟（2001）。台灣同志運動與同志諮詢熱線的研究。國立台灣大
學政治學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
賴鈺麟（2002）。臺灣性傾向歧視之現狀。載於李茂生(主編)，2002
年台灣人權報告（頁179-201）。台北 : 前衛。
謝小芩（1995）。國中健康教育教科書性別意識型態分析。教育部兩
性平等評估論文。2004年3月15日，取自
http//www.gender.edu.tw/paper/paper_18.htm
謝小芩、王秀雲（1994）。國中健康教育教科書之性別意識型態分
析。論文發表於嘉義中正大學成人與繼續教育研究所主辦之「性
別研究教學研討會」。嘉義：中正大學。
謝世忠（1987）。認同的污名。台北：自立晚報社。
蕭昭君（2002）。國小師資培育教導的是誰的知識?：初等教育教科
書性別內容的初步檢視。教育研究資訊，10（6)，19-43。
簡家欣（1997）。九０年代台灣女同志的性別抗爭文化：T婆角色的
解構、重構與超越。思與言，35， 145-209。
蘇芊玲（2002）。兩性平等教育的本土發展與實踐。台北：女書。
蘇家瑩（2000）。大學女生社團領導經驗與心理社會發展歷程之研
究。國立臺灣師範大學公民訓育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台
北。

二、英文部分：
Althusser, L. (2001). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. Monthly Review Press.
Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior-privacy, personal space,
territory, crowding (3rd ed.). Monterey CA: Brooks/Cole.
Anonymous. (1977). A homosexual teacher’s argument and plea. PhiDelta Kappan, 59(2), 93-94.
Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2003)。社會心理學(Social psychology)。余伯泉、李茂興(譯) 。台北：弘智。
Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A development theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518-529.
Banning, J. H. (1989). Creating a climate for successful student development: The campus ecology manager role. In U. Dilworth & G. R. Hanson (Eds.), Student services: A handbook for the profession (2nd ed., pp. 304-322). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (1997)。社會心理學(Social psychology)。曾華源、劉曉春(譯）。台北：洪葉。
Barber, J.S.＆ Mobley, M.(1999). Counseling gay adolescence. In A. M. Horne,＆ M. S. Kiselica (Eds.). Handbook of counseling boys and adolescent males: A
practitioner’s guide. CA: Publications.
Basow, S. A. (1992). Gender:stereotypes and roles. Pacific Grove, CA : Brooks.
Baxter, M. (2001). A constructivist revision of the measure of epistemological reflection. Journal of College Student Development, 42(6), 520-534.
Bell, C. C., & Williamson, J. (2002). Articals on special populations published in psychiatric Service between 1950 and 1999. Psychiatric Service, 53, 419-424.
Bell, D., & Valentine, G. (Eds.). (1995). Mapping desire. New York: Routledge.
Bischke, J. M., Wberz, A. B., & Wilson, D. (2000). Empirical Investigation of lesbian,
gay, and bisexual college students. In V. A. Wall & N. J Evans (Eds.), Toward
Acceptance Sexual Orientation Issues on Campus (pp. 29-58). ACPA.
Bourassa, D., & Shipton, B. (1991). Addressing lesbian and gay issues in residence hall environment. In N. J. Evans & V. A. Wall (Eds.), Beyond tolerance: Gay, Lesbian and bisexual on campus (pp. 79-96). ACPA.
Bradford, J., Ryan, C., & Rothblum, E. D. (1994). National lesbian health care survey: Implications For mental Health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 228-242.
Brown, L. S. (1995). Lesbian identities: Concepts and issues. In A. R. D'Augelli & C. J. Patterson (Eds.), Lesbian , gay, and bisexual identities over the lifespan: Psychological perspectives (pp. 3-23). New York: Oxford University Press.
Brown, R. D., Clarke, B., Gortmaker, V., & Robinson-Keilig, R. (2004). Assessing the campus climate for gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender (GLBT) students using a multiple perspectives approach. Journal of College Student development, 45(1), 8-27.
Bulter, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New york: Routledge.
Cage, M. C. (1993, March 10). Gay students face backlash of assaults and harassment. Chronicle of Higher Education, 22,1-12.
Cain, R. (1991). Stigma management and gay identity development. Social Work, 36, 67-73.
Camille, L. (2002). The impact of belonging to a high school gay/ straight alliance. The High School Journal, 85(3), 13-26.
Cass, V. (1979). Homosexual identity formation: A theoretical model. Journal of
Homosexuality, 4, 219-235.
Cass, V. (1984a). Homosexual identity: A concept in need of definition. In J. P. De
Cecco (Ed.), Bisexual and homosexual identities: Critical clinical issues (pp.
105-126). New York: Haworth Press.
Cass, V. (1996). Sexual orientation identity formation: A western phenomenon. In R. P. Cabau & T. S. Stein (Eds.), Textbook of homosexuality and mental health ( pp. 227-251). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
Castells, M. (1997)。認同的力量(The Power of Identity)。夏鑄九、黃麗玲、黃肇新、楊長苓、黃慧琦、劉昭吟(譯）。台北：唐山。
Centerwall, E. (1996)。可以真實感受的愛(Love！You can really feel it, You Know)。劉慧君(譯)。台北：女書。
Chapman, B. E., & Brannock, J. C. (1987). Proposed model of lesbian identity development: An empirical examination. Journal of Homosexuality, 14, 69-81.
Chavez, A. F., Guido-DiBrito, F., & Mallory, S. L. (2003). Learning to value the “other”: A framework of individual diversity development. Journal of College Student Development, 44(4), 453-468.
Coleman, E. (1982). Developmental stages of the coming out process. Journal of Homosexuality, 7(23), 31-43.
Cook, A. (1991). The role of sexual identity in youth suicide. (Respect All Youth Issue Paper). Washington, DC: Parents & Friends of Lesbians and Gays.
Craing, L. A. (2002). Assessment and analysis of campus climate for gay, lesbian, and bisexual, and transgenders students at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. Unpublished master dissertation, University of Massachusetts Lowell, MA.
Croteau, J. M., & Lark, J. S. (1995a). On being lesbian, gayorbisexual in student affairs: A national survey of experiences on the job. NASPA Journal, 32, 189-197.
Croteau, J. M., & Lark, J. S. (1995b). A qualitative investigation of biased and exemplary student affairs practice concerning lesbian, gay and bisexual issues. Journal of College Student Development, 36, 472-482.
Croteau, J. M., & von Destinon, M. (1994). A national survey of job search experiences of lesbian, gay and bisexual student affairs professionals. Journal of College Student Development, 35, 40-45.
Croteau. J. M., & Talbot, D. M. (2000). Understanding the landscape: An empirical view of lesbian, gay, and bisexual issues in the student affairs professions. In Wall, V. A., & Evans, N. J. Toward Acception: Sex Orientation Issues on Campus (pp. 1-58). ACPA.
D’Augelli, A. R. (1989a). Lesbians and gay men on campus: visibility, empowerment, and educational, empowerment, and educational leadership. Peabody Journal of Education, 66, 124-142.
D’Augelli, A. R. (1989b). Lesbians’ and gay men’s experiences of discrimination and harassment in a university community. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 317-321.
D’Augelli, A. R. (1991). Gay men in college: Identity processes and adaptations. Journal of College Student Development, 32, 140-146.
D’Augelli, A. R. (1992). Teaching lesbian/gay development: From oppression to exceptionality. In K.M. Harbeck (Ed.), Coming out of the classroom closet: Gay and lesbian students, teachers, and curricula (pp. 213-227). New York: Harrington Park.
D’Augelli, A. R. (1993). Preventing mental health problems among lesbian and gay college students. Journal of Primary Prevention, 13, 245-261.
D’Augeli, A. R. (1994). Identity development and sexual orientation: Toward a model of lesbian, gay, and bisexual development. In E. J. Trickett, R. J. Watts, & D. Birman (Eds.), Human diversity: Perspectives on people in context (pp. 312-333). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
D’ Augelli, A. R., & Rose, M. L. (1990). Homophobia in University community: Attitude and experiences of heterosexual freshmen. Journal of College Student Development, 13, 484-491.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
DeSurra, C. J., & Church, K. A. (1994). Unlocking the classroom closet: Privileging the marginalized voices of gay/lesbian college student. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
Durkheim, E. (1984). The division of labour in society. Hampshire: Macmillan.
Eddy, W., & Forner, D. S. (2000). Assessing campus environments for the lesbian, gay and bisexual population. In V. A. Wall, J. Washington, & N. J. Evans (Eds.), Toward Acceptance Sexual Orientation Issues on Campus (pp. 131-1549). ACPA.
Ellsworth, E. (1994). Why doesn’t this feel empowering？ In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp90-119). New York: Routledge.
Erikson, E. H. (1974). Dimensions of a new identity. New York: Norton.
Erwin, P. (1998)。兒童到青少年的友誼發展(Friendship in childhood and
Adolescence)。黃牧仁(譯）。台北：五南。
Esterberg, K. G. (1997). Lesbian & bisexual identities: Constructing communities, constructing selves. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Evan, N. J., & Broido, E. M. (1999). Coming out in college residence halls:
negotiation meaning, challenges, supports. Journal of College Student
Development, 40(6), 658-668.
Evans, N. J., & D’Augelli, A. R. (1996). Lesbians, gay, and bisexual people in college. In R. C. Savin-Williams & K. M. Cohen (Eds.), The Lives of lesbians, ay, and bisexual: children to adults. Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
Evans, N. J., Forney, D. S., & Guido-DiBrito, F. (1998). Student development in college: Theory , research , and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Evans, N. J., & Herriott, T. K. (2004). Freshmen impressions: How investigating the campus climate for LGBT students affected four freshmen students. Journal of College Student Development, 45(3), 316-333.
Evans, N. J., & Wall, V. A. (Eds.). (1991). Beyond tolerance: gay, lesbian and bisexual on campus. American Association for Counseling and Development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service. No. ED336-683)
Faderman, L. (1984). The new gay lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality, 10, 85-95.
Fassinger, R. E. (1991). The hidden minority: Issues and challenges in working with lesbian women and gay men. The Counseling Psychologist, 19, 157-176.
Fassinger, R. E. (1995). From invisity to integration: Lesbian identity in the work-plase. The Career Development Quarterly, 44, 139-167.
Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed ( 3th ed ). New York: Continum.
Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40(3), 266-275.
Gilligan, C. (1997). In a different voice: Women’s conception of self and of morality. In D. T. Meyers (Ed.), Feminist social thought: A readers (pp. 549-582). New York: Routledge.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York:
Simon & Schuster, Inc.
Golden, C. (1994). Our politics and choices: the feminist movement and sexual orientation. In B. Green & G. M. Herek (Eds.), Lesbian and Gay Psychology, (pp. 54-70). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
Gonsiorek, J. C. (1991). The empirical basis for the demise of the illness model of the homosexuality. In J. C. Gonsiorek & J. D. Weinrich (Eds.), Homosexuality: Research Implication for public policy (pp. 115-136). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Gonsiorek, J. C. (1995). Gay male identities: Concepts and issues. In A. R. D’Augelli & C. J. Patterson (Eds.), Lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities over the lifespan (pp. 24-47). New York: Oxford University Press.
Gonsiorek, J. C., & Rudolph, J. R. (1991). Homosexual identity: coming out and other developmental events. In J. C. Gonsiorek & J. D. Weinrich (Eds.), Homosexuality: Research implications for public policy (pp.161-176). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Gramick, J. (1984). Developing a lesbian identify. In T. Darty, & S. Potter, (Eds.) Women-identified women (pp. 31-44). Palo Alto. CA: Mayfield.
Grovernor’s Commission on gay and lesbian youth (1993). Making schools safe for gay and lesbian youth: Breaking the silence in school and in families. Boston.
Harry, J. (1989). Sexual identity issues. In Report of the Secretary’s Task Force on Youth Suicide (DHHS Publication No. ADM 89-1622, 2, 131-142). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Hendryx, S. W. (1980). In defense of the homosexual teacher. Viewpoints in Teaching and Learning, 56(4), 74-84.
Herek, G. M., Kimmel, D. C., Amaro, H., & Melton, G. B. (1991). Avoiding heterosexist bias in psychological research. American Psychologist, 46(9), 957-963.
Herek, G. M.（1998）。污名與性取向（Stigama and sex Orientation）。江淑琳（譯）。台北：韋伯文化。
Hershberger, S. L., Plikington, N. W., & D’Augelli, A. R. (1997). Predictors of suicidelity among gay, lesbian and bisexual youths. Journal of Adolescent research, 12, 477-497.
Hoffman, A., Bakken, L., & Stone, B. (2001). Are educational and life experiences related to homophobia? Educational Research Quarterly. 24(4), 67-83.
Hogan, T. L., & Rentz (1996). Homophobia in the academy. Journal of College Student Development, 37(3), 309-314.
Hoover, C. K. (1994). An investigation of the preparedness of student affairs professionals to work effectively with diverse populations on campus.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
Huebner, L. A. (1989). Interaction of student and campus. In U. Delworth & G. R. Hanson (Eds.), Student services: A handbook for the profession (2nd ed., pp. 165-208). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Huebner, L. A., & Lawson, J. M. (1990). Understanding and assessing college environment. In D. G. Creamer & Associates, College student development: Theory and practice for the 1990s. (pp. 127-151). Alexandria, VA: ACPA.
Jones, S. R. (2002). (Re) Writing the word: Methodological strategies and issues in qualitative research. Journal of College Student Development, 43(4), 461-473.
Juul, T. P. (1995). Boy, girls, and others: Affectional differences between self-identified lesbian, gay male, and bisexual public school teachers in job satisfaction, job stress, and identity. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (San ancisco, CA, April 18-22, 1995). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 383682）
Kathryn, W. (1997)。身體認同：同一與差異（Identity and difference）。林文琪（譯）。台北：韋伯。
Keith, J.(1996)。歷史的再思考（Re-thinking History）。賈士蘅(譯）。台北：麥田。
Khayatt, M. D. (1994). Lesbian teachers: An invisible presence. SUNY Series, Feminist Theory in Education, and SUNY Series, The Psychology of Women. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 409406)
Kitzinger, C. (1995). Social constructionism: Implications for lesbian and gay psychology. In A. R. D’Augelli & C. J. Patterson (Eds.), Lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities over the lifespan: Psychological perspectives (pp. 136- 161). New York: Oxford University Press.
Kosciw, J. G. (2003). The Relationship of homophobic harassment and discrimination to family processes, parenting and children’s well-being in families with lesbians and gay parents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
Kristine L. Falco,Psy.D.(1991). Psychotherapy with lesbian clients: Theory into
practice Brunner/Mazel, Inc.
Lance, L. M. (2002). Heterosexism and homophobia among college students. College Student Journal, 36(3), 410-415.
Lee, J. A. (1977). Going Public: A study in the sociology of homosexual liberation. Journal of Homosexually, 3, 49-78.
Levinger, G., & Levinger, A. C. (1986). The temporal course of close relationships: some thoughts about the development of children’s ties. In: W. W. Hartup & Z. Rubin (Eds.), Relationships and developmenr. NJ: Erlbaum.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985).Naturalistic inquire. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Litton, E. F. (1999). Stories of Courage and Hope: Gay and Lesbian Catholic Elementary School Teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Montreal, Canada, April 1-24).
Lopez, G., & Chism, N. (1993). Classroom concerns of gay and lesbian students: The invisible minority. College Teaching. 41, 97-103.
Malanney, G. D., Williams, E. A., & Geller, W. W. (1997). Assessing campus climate
for gays Lesbians and bisexuals at two institutions. Journal of Collge Studentdevelopment, 38, 123-128.
Malinowitz, H. (1995). Textual orientations: Lesbian and gay students and the
making of discourse communities. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
McAndrew, F.T.(1995)。環境心理學(Environmental Psychology)。危芷芬(譯)。台北：五南。
McCarn, S. R. (1996). Revisioning sexual minority identity formation: A new model of lesbian identity and its implications for counseling and research. Counseling Psychologist, 24, 508-535.
McCarn, S. R., & Fassinger, R. E. (1996). Revisioning sexual minority identity formation: A new model of lesbian identity and its implications for counseling and research. Counseling Psychologist, 24, 508-535.
McDonald, G. J. (1982). Individual differences in the coming out process for gay men: Implications for theoretical models. Journal of Homosexuality, 8, 47-60.
McHugh, E. C., & Sediacek , W. (1997). Attitude of heterosexual students toward their gay male and lesbian peers. Journal of College Student, 38(6), 565-567.
Meyer, I. H. (1995). Minority stress and mental health in gay man. Journal of Health And Social Behavior, 36, 38-56.
Miller, T. K. (2003). The CAS Book of Professional Standards for Higher Education. Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education. Washington, DC.
Milley, B.,(1995). A family caregivers and limitations in social activities：empowerment approach. Research on Aging,12(1), 72-93
Mohr, J. J., & Sedlacek, W. E. (2000). Perceived barriers to friendship with lesbians
and gay men among university students. Journal of College Student Development, 41(1), 70-80.
Moos, R. H. (1976). The human context environmental determinants of behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Moos, R. H. (1979). Evaluating educational environments: Procedures, measures, findings, and policy implications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Morrow, D. F. (1996). Coming-out issues for adult lesbians: a group intervention. Social Work, 41, 647-656.
Murphy, J. A., Rawlings, E. I., & Howe, S. R. (2002). A survey of clinical psychologists on treating lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 183-189.
Muska, M. (2001). Fighting homophobia in college athletics. The Education Digest Ann Arbor, 66, 64-72.
Newman, B. S., & Muzzonigro, P. G. (1993). The effects of traditional family values on the coming out process of gay male adolescents. Adolescence, 29(109), 213-226.
Nolte, M.C. (1973). Gay teachers: the march from closet to classroom. American School Board Journal, 160(7), 28-32.
Padgett, D. K. (1998)。質化研究與社會工作 (Qualitative methods in social work research challenges and rewards )。王金永、李易蓁、李婉萍、邱慧雯、許如悅、陳杏容、梁慧雯、劉昭君、簡憶玲、蘇英足（譯）。台北：雙葉。
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Insights and findings from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college Affects students. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Patton, M. Q.(1995)。質的評鑑與研究 ( Qualitative evaluation and research methods)。吳芝儀、李奉儒（譯）。台北：桂冠。
Pilkington, N. W., & D’Augelli, A. R. (1995). Victimization of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth in community setting. Development Psychology, 23, 33-56.
Polkinghore, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human science. State Universuty of New Youk Press.
Rensenbrink, C. W. (1996). What difference does it make? The story of a lesbian teacher. Harvard Education Review, 66(2), 257-270.
Reynolds, A. L., & Hanjorgiris, W. F. (2000). Coming out: Lesbian, gay and bisexual identity development. In R. M. Perez, K. A. DeBord, & K. J. Bieschke (Eds.), Handbook of counseling and psychotherapy with lesbian, gay, and bisexual client. (pp. 35-55). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Rhoads, R. A. (1994). Coming out in college: The struggle for a queer identity. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey. Scheible, K. L. (1986). Self-narratives and adventure. In T. R. Sarbin (Ed.), Narrative psychology. New York: Praeger.
Rhoads, R. A. (1995a, January 27). The campus climate for gay students who leave “the closet.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, 56, 28-32.
Rhoads, R. A. (1995b). Learning from the coming-out experience of college male.
Journal of College Student Development, 36, 4-74.
Riddle, D. (1996). Riddle homophobia scale. In M. Adams, P. Brigham, P. Dalpes, & L. Marchesani (Eds.), Social diversity and social justice: Gay, lesbian and bisexual oppression (pp. 31). Dubuque, IA: KENDALL/Hunt publishing.
Rofes, E. (1989). Opening up the classroom closet: Responding to the educational needs of gay and lesbian youth. Harvard Educational Review, 59(4), 444-453.
Rosenberg, M.(1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.
Sanlo, R. L. (Ed.). (1998). Working with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender college students: A handbook for faculty and administrators. Westport, CT: Greenwood press.
Savin-William, R. C. (1990). Gay and lesbian youth: expressions of identity. New
York: Hemisphere Pub. Corp.
Savin-William, R. C. (1995). Lesbian, gay male, and bisexual Adolescence. In A. R. D’Augelli & C. J. Patterson (Eds.). Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identities over the lifespan. New York: Oxford University Press.
Savin-William, R. C. (1998). The disclosure to families of same-sex attractions by lesbian, gay, and bisexual youths. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 8(1), 49-68.
Schreier, B. A. (1995). Moving Beyond Tolerance: A New Paradigm For
Programming About Homophobia and Heterosexism, College Student
Development, 36(1), 19-26.
Schuh, J. H. (1989). Community development. In G. S. Blimling (Eds.), The experienced resident assistant (pp. 3-16). Dubuque, I. A.: Kendall/Hunt.
Schwandt, T. A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 189-213). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Shane, T. (1996). Is it safe to come out yet? The impact of secondary schooling on the positive identity development of ten young gay men, or, that''s a queer way to behave? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 77th, New York, NY. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 395 262).
Shidlo, A. (1994). Internal Homophobia: conceptual and empirical issures in
measurement. In B. Greene & G. M. Herek (Eds.). Lesbian and gay psychology:
Theory , research and clinical application (pp.176-205). Thousand
Oaks,CA:Sage.
Signorile, M. (1996). Outing Yourself. New York:Fireside.
Simmoni, J. E. (1996). Pathways to prejudice: predicting students’s heterosexist
attitudes with demographic, self-esteem, and contact with lesbian and gay men.
Journal of College Student development,37(1),68-72.
Slugoski, B. R., & Ginsburg, G. P. (1989). Ego identity and explanatory speech. In J.
Shotter & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), Texts of identity (pp. 36-55). CA: Sage.
Smith, E. R., & Mackie, D. M.(2001)。社會心理學（Social psychology）。莊耀嘉、
王重鳴（譯）。臺北：桂冠。
Sophie, J. (1986). A critical examination of stage theories of lesbian identity
development. Journal of Homosexuality, 12, 39-51.
Sophie, J. (1987). Internalized homophobia and lesbian identity. Journal of
Homosexuality, 14, 53-65.
Stevenson, M. R. (1988). Promoting tolerance for homosexuality: An evaluation of
intervention strategies. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 500-511.
Strange, C. C. (1996). Development impacts of campus living environments. In R. B.
Winston, Jr., S. Anchors & Associates, Student housing and residential life, (pp.
134-166). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Strange, C. C. (1996). Dynamics of campus environments. In S.R. Komives, D. B. Woodard Jr., & Associates, Student services: A handbook for the profession.（3rd., pp. 244-268). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Strauss, A. L, & Corbin, J.(1997)。質性研究概論(Basics of qualitative research : grounded theory procedures and techniques)。徐宗國（譯）。台北：巨流。
Szymanski, D. M., Chung, Y. B., & Balsam, K. F. (2001). Psychosocial correlates of internalized homophobia in lesbians. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 27-38.
Talbot, D. M. (1992). A multimethod study of the diversity emphasis in master’s
degree programs in college student affairs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
University of Maryland, College Park.
Talbot, D. M.,(1992). A multimethod study of the diversity emphasis in master’s degree programs in college student affairs, Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
Talbot, D. M., & Harvey, K. A. (1993). A follow-up multimethod study of the diversity
emphasis in a broad range of master’s degree programs in student affairs.
Unpublished raw data. (Information available from the authors.)
Talbot, D. M., & Kocarek, C. (1997). Student affairs graduate faculty’s level of
knowledge, comfort and skill with issues of diversity. Journal of College Student Development, 38, 278-287.
Talbot, D. M. (2003). Multicuturalism. In S. R. Komives & D. B. Woodard (Eds.), Student Services (pp. 421-446). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Tate, F. B., & Longo, D. A. (2004). Homophibia: A Challenge for Psychosocial
Nursing, Journal of Psychosocial Nirsing, 42(8), 24-33.
Troiden, R. R. (1984). Self, self-concept, identity, and homosexual identity:
Constructs in need of definition and differentiation. Journal of Homosexuality,
10, 97-109.
Troiden, R. R. (1988). Gay and lesbian identity: A sociological analysis. New York: General Hall.
Troiden, R. R. (1989). The formation of homosexual identities. Journal of Homosexuality, 17, 43-74.
Waldner, L. K., & Magruder, B. (1999), Coming out to parent: Perception of family relations, perceived resources, and identity expression as predictors of identity disclosure of gay and lesbian adolescents. Journal of Homosexuality, 37(2), 83-100.
Wall, V. A., & Evans, N. J. (2000). Toward Acception: Sex Orientation Issues on Campus. ACPA.
Wall, V. A., Washington, J., Evans, N. J., & Papish, R. A. (2000). From the trenches:
Strategies for facilitating lesbian, gay, and bisexual awareness programs for
college students. In Wall, V. A., Washington, J., & Evans, N. J. (Eds.), Toward
Acceptance Sexual Orientation Issues on Campus (pp. 157-189). ACPA.
Washington, J. (1991). Beyond tolerance: Toward understanding, appreciation and celebration. Handout developed for an ACPA Conference, Chigago.
Weber, A. L.(1992)。社會心理學(Social psychology)。趙居蓮(譯)。台北：桂
冠。
Westin, A. (1970). Privacy and freedom. New York: Atheneum.
Whitehead, M. M., & Nokes, K. M. (1990). An examination of demographic variables, nurturance, and empathy among homosexual and heterosexual Big Brother/Big Sister volunteers. Journal of Homosexuality, 19(4), 89-101.
Whitt, E. J., (1996). Assessing student cultures. In M. L. Updraft & J. H. Schuh (Eds.,), Assessing in student affairs: A guide for practitioners ( pp.189-216 ) San Francisco: Jossey - Bass
Wilson, M. E. (1998). Thriving in relationship: An exploration of close friendships of women student affairs professionals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University.
Zera, D. (1992). Coming out of age in heterosexist world: the development of gay and
lesbian adolescents. Adolescence, 27(108), 849-854.