回饋型群眾募資平台的興起，成為具有創意想法提案者募資的重要管道，亦促進理念的推廣。民眾可以透過平台參與募資，對有興趣支持的提案做出貢獻並給予贊助。本研究旨在探討回饋型募資平台之群眾知覺價值與使用互動性對其贊助意願之影響。經由文獻歸納，將知覺價值主構面分為體驗價值與實用價值，使用互動性則分為人機互動與人際互動。透過網路問卷調查，獲得336份有效問卷。再以統計方式進行資料分析，並根據結果，給予回饋型群眾募資平台經營業者、設計者、提案者，以及後續研究者建議，以供相關領域參考。茲將本研究重要發現分述如下：

一、在群眾知覺價值中，享樂價值以「覺得滿足」、社會價值以「覺得獲得他人認同」、資訊價值以「覺得認識新事物」、功利價值以「覺得便利」，對群眾贊助意願影響較大。

二、在群眾互動性中，回應性以「可以從系統取得可信的回應」、操控性以「可以連結系統各功能或頁面」、參與性以「可以評論」、社群性以「可以認識同好」，對群眾贊助意願影響較大。

三、「實用價值」在對群眾贊助意願的影響上，顯著高於「體驗價值」；而「人機互動」則顯著高於「人際互動」。

四、不同性別群眾在「享樂價值」、「社會價值」、「操控性」對贊助意願達顯著差異；不同平台使用頻率群眾在「享樂價值」、「功利價值」對贊助意願達顯著差異；不同贊助經驗群眾在「享樂價值」、「資訊價值」、「功利價值」、「操控性」、「參與性」對贊助意願達顯著差異。

The rise of reward-based crowdfunding platforms has not only become an important channel for proposers with creative ideas to fundraise, but also contributed to the promotion of ideas. People can participate in crowdfunding process through various platforms, and sponsor some proposals in which they are interested. The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of perceived value and interactivity of reward-based crowdfunding platforms on participants’ sponsor intention. According to relevant literature, the perceived value is divided into two main facets, practical values and experiential values. Interactivity is divided human-computer interaction and interpersonal interaction. Through the Internet, there are 336 valid questionnaires collected. The data is analyzed with statistic method, and based on the results, this study may provide suggestions for platform operators, designers, proposers, and follow-up research in related fields. The major findings are as follows:

1. Among perceived values, “feeling content” in hedonic values, “feeling approved by others” in social values, “feeling of knowing new things” in information values, and “feeling convenient” in utilitarian values have a greater impact on participants’ sponsor intention.

2. Among interactivity, “getting credible response from the system” in responsiveness, “linking to other functions or pages in the system” in controllability, “making comments” in participation, and “meeting fellows” in community have a greater impact on participants’ sponsor intention.

3. The impact of “practical values” on participants’ sponsor intention is significantly higher than the “experiential values”; and “human-computer interaction” is significantly over “interpersonal interaction.”

4. Participants of different genders show significant difference toward their sponsor intention in terms of “hedonic values”, “social values”, and “controllability;’’ participants of different frequency of using the platforms show significant difference toward their sponsor intention in “hedonic values” and “utilitarian values;” participants of different experience in sponsorship show significant difference toward their sponsor intention in “hedonic values”, “information values”, “controllability”, and “participation.”

一、中文文獻
flyingV（2020 年 2月 10 日）。媒體資源 | flyingV【部落格文字資料】。取自 https://www.flyingv.cc/media
王皓萱（2016）。群眾募資平台服務與介面設計之研究－以flyingV為例（碩士論文）。取自臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。（系統編號 104YUNT0787004）
朱文儀、林亭佑（2016）。群眾募資專案成效之影響因素-台灣 flyingV 群眾募資平台之實證研究。台灣管理學刊，16（2），53-73。
何雍慶、霍志強、呂佳茹（2007）。網路購物通路對顧客價值之研究–以方法目的鏈途徑。遠東學報，24（2），119-130。
吳明隆、張毓仁（2011）。SPSS(PASW)與統計應用分析Ⅰ。臺北市：五南。
吳明隆、涂金堂（2014）。SPSS與統計應用分析。臺北市：五南。
李培菁、顏建賢（2006）。民俗節慶活動認同感與贊助意願之研究－以大甲媽祖 文化節為例。農業推廣文彙，51，115-134。
周文欽（2004）。研究方法：實徵性研究取向（第二版）。臺北市：心理。
周政德（2016）。顧客網路代購的知覺模糊與知覺價值對購買意圖之研究。創新研發學刊，12（1），31-43。
林淑芳（2013）。 臨場感,、互動性、知覺價值對網購滿意度的影響分析.。行銷評論，10（2），191-209。
林雅燕（2014）。新興募資方式－群眾募資行為之初探。經濟研究，14，152-172。
林秀英、陳勇志（2013）。圓夢推手的理想與現實-群眾募資平台的發展現況與挑戰課題。臺灣經濟研究月刊，36（3），98-105。
邱皓政（2008）。量化研究法(一)：研究設計與資料分析（修訂初版）。臺北市：雙葉書廊。
徐淑如、林家琪（2010）。線上品牌社群知覺關鍵多數、知覺價值與忠誠度之研究。 資訊管理學報，17（2），175-200。
財團法人資訊工業策進會產業情報研究所（2015）。台灣群眾幕資平台發展現況。臺北市：財團法人資訊工業策進會產業情報研究所。
曹景翔（2015）。全球群眾募資發展趨勢與台灣因應策略。產業與管理論壇，17（3），74-75。
陳照森、白翊玄（2013）。影響線上拍賣網站購買意願因素之研究。中華科技大學學報，54，103-120。
創市際市場研究顧問（2018）。2018 年台灣網路報告。財團法人台灣網路資訊中心。臺北市：財團法人臺灣網路資訊中心。
曾紀幸、林子娟、郭信智（2017）。線上群眾募資平台之參與意圖與行為之影響因素。行銷評論，14（3），231-262。
馮天昱、陳玉華（2015）。社群行銷之網路互動性與訊息論點品質對購買意願的影響效應。資訊傳播研究，5（2），47-71。
黃博怡、賴威仁、遲淑華、張凱君、盧淑惠、張蕙嬿、吳佩珊、黃若瑜、戴郁文（2015）。群眾募資興起對於小型企業發展與金融業之影響。財團法人台灣金融研訓院結案報告。臺北市：財團法人台灣金融研訓院。
黃儀婷、劉恬佳（2018）。從消費者腦波變化探索行動購物之數字資訊對購買意圖影響。電子商務研究，16（2），103-135。
葉至誠、葉立誠（2011）。研究方法與論文寫作。臺北市：商鼎。
樊祖燁、劉芳梅、丁中得（2012）。 網路互動性、口碑效果對忠誠度之影響－社群網站為例。育達科大學報，32，157-174。
潘彥州（2015）。關於群眾募資與股權群眾募資之法律及政策分析。全國律師月刊，19（3），32-39。
蔡文仁（2016）。網站和消費者的互動性對購買意願的影響之研究。東方學報，36，145-168。
蕭丞傑、游翊宏（2019）。探討群衆募資中社會資本之影響效果。資訊社會研究，37，121-146。
賴明弘、楊筑涵（2017）。美台育成加速器與群眾募資平台商業模式比較研究。中科大學報，4（1），1-36。
謝佩杏（2017）。眾籌圓夢？：論眾籌在香港的實踐。文化研究@嶺南，60，8。
戴偉峻、施雅馨（2010）。探討性別差異使用網路購物之研究－以使用與滿足理論為基礎。第五屆數位教學暨資訊實務研討會，399-416。臺南市：南台科技大學資訊管理學系。
關復勇、吳美貞（2006）。網路零售品牌消費經驗之研究-跨國性台日比較。電子商務學報，8（1），25-44。

二、英文文獻
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Andy, F. (2000). Discovering statistics using spss for windows: Advanced techniques for the beginner. London, England: Sage Publications.
Alreck, P., & Settle, R. B. (2002). Gender effects on Internet, catalogue and store shopping. Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 9(2), 150-162.
Barker, V. (2009). Older adolescents’ motivations for social network site use: The influence of gender, group identity, and collective self-esteem. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 12(2), 209-213.
Baumgardner, T., Neufeld, C., Huang, P. C. T., Sondhi, T., Carlos, F., & Talha, M. A. (2017). Crowdfunding as a fast‐expanding market for the creation of capital and shared value. Thunderbird International Business Review, 59(1), 115-126.
Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of business venturing, 29(5), 585-609.
Bi, S., Liu, Z., & Usman, K. (2017). The influence of online information on investing decisions of reward-based crowdfunding. Journal of Business Research, 71, 10-18.
Borst, I., Moser, C., & Ferguson, J. (2018). From friendfunding to crowdfunding: Relevance of relationships, social media, and platform activities to crowdfunding performance. new media & society, 20(4), 1396-1414.
Chang, E. C., & Tseng, Y. F. (2013). Research note: E-store image, perceived value and perceived risk. Journal of business research, 66(7), 864-870.
Chang, S. H., Chih, W. H., Liou, D. K., & Yang, Y. T. (2016). The mediation of cognitive attitude for online shopping. Information Technology & People, 29(3), 618-646.
Chen, S., Thomas, S., & Kohli, C. (2016). What really makes a promotional campaign succeed on a crowdfunding platform? Guilt, utilitarian products, emotional messaging, and fewer but meaningful rewards drive donations. Journal of Advertising Research, 56(1), 81-94.
Cheng, M. S., Wang, S. T., Lin, Y. C., & Vivek, S. D. (2009). Why do customers utilize the internet as a retailing platform? A view from consumer perceived value. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 21(1), 144-160.
Chiu, C. M., Wang, E. T., Fang, Y. H., & Huang, H. Y. (2014). Understanding customers’ repeat purchase intentions in B2C e‐commerce: The roles of utilitarian value, hedonic value and perceived risk. Information Systems Journal, 24(1), 85-114.
Chu, C. C., Cheng, Y. F., Tsai, F. S., Tsai, S. B., & Lu, K. H. (2019). Open innovation in crowdfunding context: Diversity, knowledge, and networks. Sustainability, 11(1), 180.
Cornwell, T. B., Weeks, C. S., & Roy, D. P. (2005). Sponsorship-linked marketing: Opening the black box. Journal of advertising, 34(2), 21-42.
Davies, W. E., & Giovannetti, E. (2018). Signalling experience & reciprocity to temper asymmetric information in crowdfunding evidence from 10,000 projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 133, 118-131.
Dolphin, R. R. (2003). Sponsorship: Perspectives on its strategic role. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 8(3), 173-186.
Dushnitsky, G., Guerini, M., Piva, E., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2016). Crowdfunding in Europe: Determinants of platform creation across countries. California management review, 58(2), 44-71.
Fang, Y. H. (2012). Does online interactivity matter? Exploring the role of interactivity strategies in consumer decision making. Computers in human behavior, 28(5), 1790-1804.
Gallarza, M. G., Gil‐Saura, I., & Holbrook, M. B. (2011). The value of value: Further excursions on the meaning and role of customer value. Journal of consumer behaviour, 10(4), 179-191.
Gan, C., & Wang, W. (2017). The influence of perceived value on purchase intention in social commerce context. Internet Research, 27(4), 772-785.
Gedda, D., Nilsson, B., Såthén, Z., & Søilen, K. S. (2016). Crowdfunding: Finding the optimal platform for funders and entrepreneurs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(3), 31-40.
Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, 82-88.
Gutsche, J., & Sylla, S. (2018). Success factors of crowdfunding projects on the kickstarter platform. In Bakırcı F., Heupel T., Kocagöz O., Özen Ü. (Eds.), German-Turkish Perspectives on IT and Innovation Management (pp. 361-374). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Gabler.
Ho, H. Y., Lin, P. C., & Lu, M. H. (2014). Effects of online crowdfunding on consumers’ perceived value and purchase intention. The Anthropologist, 17(3), 837-844.
Hung, W. T., Tsang, S. S., & Liu, H. Y. (2010). Website characteristics and the impact of user perceived value on user behavior in web 2.0. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 13(1), 1-18.
Jiang, L., Jun, M., & Yang, Z. (2016). Customer-perceived value and loyalty: How do key service quality dimensions matter in the context of B2C e-commerce? Service Business, 10(2), 301-317.
Jiang, Z., Chan, J., Tan, B. C., & Chua, W. S. (2010). Effects of interactivity on website involvement and purchase intention. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(1), 1.
Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: A concept explication. New media & society, 4(3), 355-383.
Kickstarter (2020, February 10). Kickstarter stats- kickstarter [Web blog message]. Retrieved from https://www.kickstarter.com/help/stats?ref=global-footer
Kang, M., Gao, Y., Wang, T., & Zheng, H. (2016). Understanding the determinants of funders’ investment intentions on crowdfunding platforms: A trust-based perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(8), 1800-1819.
Kim, J., Spielmann, N., & McMillan, S. J. (2012). Experience effects on interactivity: Functions, processes, and perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 65(11), 1543-1550.
Kraus, S., Richter, C., Brem, A., Cheng, C. F., & Chang, M. L. (2016). Strategies for reward-based crowdfunding campaigns. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 1(1), 13-23.
Lee, T. (2005). The impact of perceptions of interactivity on customer trust and transaction intentions in mobile commerce. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 6(3), 165-180.
Li, G. (2015). The influence of interactivity on experiential value. Management & Engineering, (20), 19-23.
Liang, T. P., Wu, S. P. J., & Huang, C. C. (2019). Why funders invest in crowdfunding projects: Role of trust from the dual-process perspective. Information & Management, 56(1), 70-84.
Liu, L., Suh, A., & Wagner, C. (2018). Empathy or perceived credibility? An empirical study on individual donation behavior in charitable crowdfunding. Internet Research, 28(3), 623-651.
Lowry, P. B., Spaulding, T., Wells, T., Moody, G., Moffit, K., & Madariaga, S. (2006). A theoretical model and empirical results linking website interactivity and usability satisfaction. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06), 1-9. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2006.33
Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of business venturing, 29(1), 1-16.
Madill, J., & O'Reilly, N. (2010). Investigating social marketing sponsorships: Terminology, stakeholders, and objectives. Journal of Business Research, 63(2), 133-139.
McMillan, S. J., & Hwang, J. S. (2002). Measures of perceived interactivity: An exploration of the role of direction of communication, user control, and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity. Journal of advertising, 31(3), 29-42.
Mohd-Any, A. A., Winklhofer, H., & Ennew, C. (2015). Measuring users’ value experience on a travel website (e-value): What value is cocreated by the user? Journal of Travel Research, 54(4), 496-510.
Overby, J. W., & Lee, E. J. (2006). The effects of utilitarian and hedonic online shopping value on consumer preference and intentions. Journal of Business research, 59(10-11), 1160-1166.
Pietro, F. D. (2019). Deciphering Crowdfunding. In Lynn, T., Mooney, J. G., Rosati, P., Cummins, M. (Eds.), Disrupting Finance (pp. 1-14). London, England: Palgrave Pivot.
Park, M., & Yoo, J. (2020). Effects of perceived interactivity of augmented reality on consumer responses: A mental imagery perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 101912.
Reuer, J. J., Matusik, S. F., & Jones, J. (2019). The oxford handbook of entrepreneurship and collaboration. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Roma, P., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Perrone, G. (2017). From the crowd to the market: The role of reward-based crowdfunding performance in attracting professional investors. Research Policy, 46(9), 1606-1628.
Sharma, K., & Garg, S. (2016). An investigation into consumer search and evaluation behaviour: Effect of brand name and price perceptions. Vision, 20(1), 24-36.
Sheeran, P., Trafimow, D., & Armitage, C. J. (2003). Predicting behaviour from perceived behavioural control: Tests of the accuracy assumption of the theory of planned behaviour. British journal of social psychology, 42(3), 393-410.
Song, J. H., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2008). Determinants of perceived web site interactivity. Journal of marketing, 72(2), 99-113.
Sullivan, Y. W., & Kim, D. J. (2018). Assessing the effects of consumers’ product evaluations and trust on repurchase intention in e-commerce environments. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 199-219.
Sura, S., Ahn, J., & Lee, O. (2017). Factors influencing intention to donate via social network site (SNS): From Asian’s perspective. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 164-176.
Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of retailing, 77(2), 203-220.
Teo, H. H., Oh, L. B., Liu, C., & Wei, K. K. (2003). An empirical study of the effects of interactivity on web user attitude. International journal of human-computer studies, 58(3), 281-305.
Uhrich, S., Koenigstorfer, J., & Groeppel-Klein, A. (2014). Leveraging sponsorship with corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Research, 67(9), 2023-2029.
Van Noort, G., Voorveld, H. A., & Van Reijmersdal, E. A. (2012). Interactivity in brand web sites: Cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses explained by consumers’ online flow experience. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(4), 223-234.
Wojdynski, B. W. (2011). Interactivity as super-variable: Definitions, dimensions, mediators, and implications for theory. Web Journal of Mass Communication Research, 30, 1.
WKO (2019, April 4). Crowdfunding für österreichische Unternehmen [Web blog message]. Retrieved from https://www.wko.at/service/unternehmensfuehrung-finanzierung-foerderungen/Crowdfunding_fuer_oesterreichische_Unternehmen.html
Walther, J. B., & Jang, J. W. (2012). Communication processes in participatory websites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(1), 2-15.
Wang, L., Sun, S., & Zha, J. X. (2009). An empirical research on the relationship between perceived customer value and e-loyalty. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2246-2250. doi:10.1109/IEEM.2009.5373070
Wang, N., Li, Q., Liang, H., Ye, T., & Ge, S. (2018). Understanding the importance of interaction between creators and backers in crowdfunding success. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 27, 106-117.
Wang, Z., & Yang, X. (2019). Understanding backers’ funding intention in reward crowdfunding: An elaboration likelihood perspective. Technology in Society, 58, 101149.
Wu, L. Y., Chen, K. Y., Chen, P. Y., & Cheng, S. L. (2014). Perceived value, transaction cost, and repurchase-intention in online shopping: A relational exchange perspective. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2768-2776.
Xu, B., Zheng, H., Xu, Y., & Wang, T. (2016). Configurational paths to sponsor satisfaction in crowdfunding. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 915-927.
Yang, F., & Shen, F. (2018). Effects of web interactivity: A meta-analysis. Communication Research, 45(5), 635-658.
Yoo, C. W., Kim, Y. J., & Sanders, G. L. (2015). The impact of interactivity of electronic word of mouth systems and E-Quality on decision support in the context of the e-marketplace. Information & Management, 52(4), 496-505.
Yoo, W. S., Lee, Y., & Park, J. (2010). The role of interactivity in e-tailing: Creating value and increasing satisfaction. Journal of retailing and consumer services, 17(2), 89-96.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
Zhou, M. (2014). Gender difference in web search perceptions and behavior: Does it vary by task performance? Computers & Education, 78, 174-184.
Zhao, Q., Chen, C. D., Wang, J. L., & Chen, P. C. (2017). Determinants of backers’ funding intention in crowdfunding: Social exchange theory and regulatory focus. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 370-384.