簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 王心漪
Bonnie Wang
論文名稱： 師生英文對話日記對台灣高中生英文寫作之影響
A Study of the Effects of Student-teacher Dialogue Journals on EFL Writing in High Schools in Taiwan
指導教授： 林茂松
Lin, Mao-Sung
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年： 2004
畢業學年度： 92
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 107
中文關鍵詞： 師生英文對話日記 、語言功能 、語言流利度 、寫作焦慮感 、寫作焦慮量表 、寫作能力
英文關鍵詞： Dialogue jounal writing, Language functions, Language fluency, Writing Apprehension, Zone of Proximal Development, The comprehensible input, The Daly-Miller WAT, LEA
論文種類： 學術論文
相關次數： 點閱：206  下載：53 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 本研究主旨在探討師生對話日記對於高中學生英文寫作的效益。特別針對學生在實施對話日記寫作活動前後，英文寫作流利度、態度和寫作能力的變化來分析。
    本研究以桃園縣內壢高中的一班41位同學為研究對象，這些學生利用課餘時間參與為期十四週的師生對話日記寫作活動。在活動前後，研究者以一份寫作焦慮量表測試並了解學生對於寫作焦慮感之差異；活動後，並以一份問卷調查表了解學生對師生對話日記活動的看法。研究者並根據學生所寫的英文日記，以字數、所費時間、句子結構成熟度及語言功能來分析英文寫作流利度及能力上之改變。根據統計資料分析結果，研究發現如下:
    1. 師生對話日記確能增加學生英文寫作之流利度。在參與師生對話日記寫作活動後，學生對於英文寫作之焦慮感明顯降低，不僅愈寫愈多，且花費的時間明顯少。
    2. 師生對話日記能有效提昇學生之英文寫作能力。研究者以語言功能分析日記內容發現學生不但明顯增加使用語言功能的次數，並且增加了不同語言功能的使用。
    3. 問卷調查結果顯示，參與本研究的學生對於師生對話日記大多數抱持肯定的態度。他們認為師生對話日記能讓他們在無壓力的情境下改進英文寫作能力。
    本研究建議，除了傳統式的英文作文教學，英語教師應該多多提供學生具有真實性、溝通性及互動性的英文寫作機會，師生對話日記就是良好的選擇。但實施此類活動需考慮到學生的個體性及老師本身教學負擔等因素。因此，研究者建議老師可嘗試不同之英文對話日記，如同儕交換日記，以期增加英文寫作教學之多元性與豐富性。

    This study examines the effects of student-teacher dialogue journal writing on the writing skills of EFL senior high school students in Taiwan. Dialogue journal writing seeks to promote written fluency and writing ability by allowing students to write freely on topics of their choice. Spelling and form are not marked or graded. The subjects in the study were 41 Neili Senior High School students from one class. They took part in a dialogue journal writing activity from September 2002 to December 2002. The differences in students’ written fluency, before and after the activity, were analyzed in terms of the t-test results of three elements: word count, the time students spent on their journals, and the syntactic maturity of their writing; in addition, the Daly-Miller Writing Apprehension Test (1995a) was applied for analysis of the students’ first two and last two journal entries. The differences in the students’ writing ability were also analyzed with respect to their use of various language functions. The findings of this study reveal that dialogue journal writing helps students improve their written fluency in terms of increased word count, decreased amount of time spent on writing, and a decrease in apprehensive feelings about writing in English. The students’ writing ability also improved with respect to the use of a greater variety of language functions. It was also found that nearly all the students held a positive attitude toward the dialogue journal writing activity. Based on the findings, the researcher suggests that EFL teachers provide students with chances to experiment with diverse forms of writing. Asking students to write dialogue journals is a good way to achieve such diversity. When using dialogue journals, EFL teachers should respond to their students as individuals and tailor their journal responses accordingly.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS CHINESE ABSTRACT……………………………………………………… i ENGLISH ABSTRACT…………………………………………………… ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………… iii TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………. iv LIST OF TABLES…………………………………………………….. viii LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………… ix CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Background and Theoretical Perspectives………………. 3 Purpose of the Study……………………………………….. 6 Significance of the Study………………………………… 7 Definition of Terms…………………………………………… 7 Summary and Organization of the Report………………… 9 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW Traditional Research of Teaching Writing……………… 10 Creative Approaches to Teaching Writing……………… 12 Freewriting…………………………………………… 12 The Process Approach…………………………………. 14 The Language Experience Approach………………….. 15 Research on Dialogue Journal Writing………………….. 17 The History of Dialogue Journal Writing……… 17 Definition of Dialogue Journal Writing…………… 17 The Value of Dialogue Journal Writing…………… .. 18 Research on the Relations between Dialogue Journal Writing and Written Fluency……………………… 20 Definition of Written Fluency………………………….. 20 Studies of First Language Education…………… 2l Studies in Second / Foreign Education…………. 25 Studies inside the Context of Taiwan…………. 27 Dialogue Journals and Writing…………………………….. 28 Modeling Sentences in Teachers’ Responses…………. 29 Studies outside the Context of Taiwan……………… 30 Dialogue Journal Writing as a Bridge………………… 33 Advantages and Disadvantages of Dialogue Journal Writing 34 Advantages……………………………………………… ... 34 Disadvantages……………………………………………... 35 CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY Subjects……………………………………………………… 37 Instruments……………………………………………………. 38 The Daly-Miller Apprehension Test……………………… 38 The Final Questionnaire on attitudes toward Dialogue JournalWriting……… 39 Data Collection Procedures…… 39 Data AnalysisProcedures………………………………… .. 41 Quantitative Analysis……………………………………... 41 The Number of Clauses as a Measure of Syntactic Complexity……………………………………………..... 42 Language Functions as a Measure of Writing Ability… 42 Qualitative Analysis……………………………………….. 42 CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Comparison of Written Fluency in Students’ First and Last Two Dialogue Journal Entrie 44 Difference in Mean Scores on Word Count in the Students’ First and Last Two Entries………………………………. 45 Difference in Mean Scores on Time the Students Spent in he First and Last Two Entries……………… 45 Difference in Mean Number of Clauses per T-unit in the First and Last Two Entries…………………….. 46 Difference in the Students’ Apprehension toward Writing In the Pre and Post-test…………………………………. 46 Discussion of Students’ Written Fluency Before and After Dialogue Journal Writing………………………… 49 Comparison of the Use of Language Functions in the First and LastTwo Entries………………… 53 Difference in Student Uses of Language Functions in the First and Last Two Entries………………………. 53 Discussion on the Use of Language Functions in the First and Last entries……………………………… 57 Discussion for Overall Improvement in Student Uses of Language Functions…………………………………. 58 Discussion of the Increase in Reporting General Facts…………………………………………… 61 Discussion of the Increase in Requesting Functions… 62 Discussion of the Decrease in Reporting Opinions… 64 Discussion of the Decrease in Requesting Opinions… 66 Discussion of Other Characteristics of Student Uses of Language Functions…………………………………... 67 Student Opinions of the Dialogue Journal Writing Activity……… 71 Results of the Final Questionnaire………………… 72 Results of two Open-ended Questions………………... 74 Reasons for the Positive Responses……………… 74 Reference to English Language and Learning…..74 Reference to Communication with the Teacher. 75 Reference to Self-reflection………………… 75 Reasons for Negative Responses…………………… 75 Reference to English Language and Learning… 75 Reference to Privacy……………………………… 75 Comments and Suggestions…………………………….. 76 Discussion of Student Opinions of the Dialogue JournalWriting……… . 76 CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSIONS Summary……………………………………………………………… 80 Pedagogical Implications……………………………………… 82 EFL Teachers………………………………………………… 82 Limitations of the Study…………………………………… 86 Suggestions for Future Study………………………………… 87 REFERENCES…………………………………………………………… 88 APPENDICE Appendix A: Daly-Miller Writing Apprehension Test, ESL Version… 99 Appendix B: Definitions and Examples of 14 Language Functions…………… 100 Appendix C: An Analysis of Language Functions: A Student’s Sample 102 Appendix D: Daly-Miller Writing Apprehension Test, Chinese Version………. 103 Appendix E: The Final Questionnaire on Attitudes toward Dialogue Journal Writing,Chineseversion……… l05 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 A T-test of Mean Scores on Word Count in the First and Last Two Entrie 45 Table 2 A T-test of Mean Scores on Time Students Spent in the First and Last Two Entries………………………… 46 Table 3 A T-test of Mean Number of Clauses per T-unit in the First and Last Two Entries.……………………… 46 Table 4 T-tests for Difference of the Students’ Apprehension Toward Writing In the Pre-and Post-test………………………………… 47 Table 5 Students Use of Functions: Contrast Between Mid-September and Mid-December………………………… 54 Table 6 Students Use of function by Rank Order: Contrast Between Mid-September and Mid-December… 56 Table 7 Student Changes by Distinctive Features…………… 57 Table 8 Students’ Attitude Toward the Dialogue Journal Writing……………… 72 Table 9 Students’ Views on the Topics for Dialogue Journals… 73 Table 10 Students’ Views on Quality and Quantity……… 73 Table 11 Students’ Views on Interaction…………………… 74 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 A flow chart of the study procedure………………… 40 ix

    Albertini, J. (1990). Coherence in deaf students’ writing. In J. K. Peyton (Eds.), Students and teachers writing together: Perspective on journal writing (pp.127-136). Alexandrai, VA : Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
    Alejandro, A. T. (1981). Some helps for journal writing. English Journal, 70(5), 48-49.
    Anson, C. ＆ Beach R. (1995). Journals in the Classroom: Writing to Learn. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
    Andrew, E. A., Beal,C. R. ＆ Corson, J.A. (1990). Talking on paper: dialogue as a writing task for sixth graders. Journal of Experimental Education, 58(2), 87-94.
    Applebee, A. N. (1981). Looking at writing. Educational Leadership, 38, 458-462.
    Applebee, A. (1984) Contexts for learning to write. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    Barbier, S. I. (2001). Using freewriting to help students better understand assignments and assessment . NADE Selected Conference Papers [On-line]. Available:http://www.nade.net/documents/SCP01/Barbier,﹪20Stuart.doc
    Bintz, W. ＆ Dillard, J. (1990). Becoming book buddies: Writing dialogue journals in a first grade classroom. Journal of Teaching Writing, 9(2), 133-148.
    Bizzel, P. (1989). What happens when basic writers come to college？ CCC, 37(3), 294-301.
    Bello, T. (1997). Improving ESL learners’ writing skills. ERIC Digest [On-line]. Available: http://ericir.syr.edu/plweb-cgi/obtain.pi
    Bode, B. A. (1989). Dialogue journal writing. Reading Teacher, 42(8), 568-571.
    Briton, D.M., Holten, C. A. ＆ Goodwin, J. M. (1993). Responding to dialogue journals in teacher preparation: what’s effective？ TESOL Journal, 2(4), 15-19.
    Britton, J. (1970). Language learning. Coral Cables, FL: University of Miami Press.
    Britton, J. (1984). Shaping at the point of utterance. In A. Freedman, I. Pringle ＆ J. Yalden (Eds.), Learning to write: First language/second language (2nd ed., pp.13-19). London and New York: Longman.
    Bromley, K., Winters, D., ＆ Schlimmer, K. (1994). Book buddies: Creating enthusiasm for literacy learning. The Reading Teacher, 47(5), 392-399.
    Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language leaning and teaching (5th Ed.). New York: Longman.
    Bruton, D. L. ＆ Kirby, D. R. (1987). Written fluency: Didn’t we do that last year？ English Journal, 76(7), 89-92.
    Burniske, R. W. (1994). Creating dialogue: Teacher response to journal writing. English Journal, 83(4), 74-88.
    Calkins, L. M. (1986). The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    Chen Y. M. (1996). Dialogue Journal Writing as Communication: A Descriptive Study of a Junior-high School Class. Unpublished master’s thesis, Providence University, Taiwan.
    Cheng, Y. S., Horwitz, E. K. ＆ Schallert, D. L. (1999). Language Anxiety: Differentiating writing and speaking components. Language Learning, 49(3), 417-446.
    Christensen, L. M. (1991). Teaching standard English: Whose Standard？ English Journal, 79, 36-40.
    Chow C. H.（2001）. Implementing journal writing in a freshman writing curriculum. Selected Papers from the Tenth International Symposium on English Teaching, (pp.354-366). Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co.
    Cooper, M. M. (1981). Dialogic learning across disciplines. In G. S. Morson (Eds.), Bakhtin, essays and dialogues on his work (pp.81-95). Chicago: University of Chicago.
    Cress, S. W. (1998). A sense of story: Interactive journal writing in kindergarten. Early Childhood Education Journal, 26(1), 13-17.
    Dolly, M. R. (1990). Integrating ESL reading and writing through authentic discourse. Journal of Reading, 33(5), 360-365.
    Gardern, H. (1985). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
    Dewine, S. (1977). Student journals in the communication classroom: A content analysis. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 147 912)
    Dickson, K. J. (2001). Freewriting: Prompts and feedback. The Internet TESL Journal [On-line], 7(8).
    Available: http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Dickson-Freewriting.html
    Dolly, M. R. (1990). Adult ESL students’ management of dialogue journal conversation. TESOL Quarterly, 24(14), 317-321.
    Doughty, C. ＆ Pica, T. (1986). Information Gap tasks: Do they facilitate second language acquisition？ TESOL Quarterly, 20(2), 305-325.
    Elbow, P. (1981). Writing with power: Techniques for mastering the writing process. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Elbow, P. (1998). Writing without teachers (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
    Emig, J. (1971). The composing process of twelfth graders. Urbana Illinois: National Council of Teachers of Englsih.
    Emig, J. (1981). Non-magical thinking: Presenting writing developmentally in schools. In C. H. Frederiksen (Series Eds.) ＆ J. F. Dominic (Vol. Ed.), The nature,development, and teaching of written communication: Vol. 2. Writing: Process, development and communication (pp.21-380). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Flower, L. ＆ Hayes, J.R. (1981). Plans that guide the composing process. In C. H. Frederiksen ＆ J.F. Dominic (Eds.), Writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written communication: Vol. 2. Writing: Process, development and communication. (pp.41-55) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Gannett, C. (1992). Gender and the journal: Diaries and Academic discourse. Albany: State University of New York.
    Garcia, E. E. (1988). Attributes of effective schools for language minority students. Education and Urban Society, 20, 387-398.
    Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.
    Gordon, C. (1991). The effects of the teachers’ comments on students’ journal writing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
    Grave, D. H. (1983). Writing teachers and children at work. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    Gundlach, R. A. (1981). On the nature and development of children’s writing. In C. H. Frederiksen ＆ J.F. Dominic (Eds.), Writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written communication: Vol. 2. Writing: Process, development and communication. (pp.41-55) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Gungle, B. W. ＆ Taylor, V. (1989). Writing apprehension and second language writers. In D. M. Johnson ＆ D. H. Roen (Eds.). Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students (pp.235-248). New York: Longman.
    Hamayan, E.V. (1989). Teaching writing to potentially English proficient students using whole language approaches. ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education [On-line], 11. Available: http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/ncbepubs/classics/pig/11writing.htm#crandall1981
    Heath, G. (1988). Journals in a classroom: one teacher’s trials and errors. English Journal, 77. 58-60.
    Hendrickson, J. (1976). The effect of error correction treatment upon adequate and accurate communication in the written composition of adult learners of ESL. Unpolished Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio State University.
    Hollowell, J., ＆ Nelson, G. L. (1982). Bait and rebait: We should abolish personal journals in English Classes. English Journal, 71(1), 14-17.
    Holmes, V. L. ＆ Moulton, M. R. (1997). Dialogue journals as an ESL learning strategy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 40(8), 616-321
    Horowitz, D. (1986). Process not product: Less than meets the eye. TESOL Quarterly, 20(1), 141-143.
    Huang, J. Y.（2000）. Effective Journal Writing：A pilot study. Selected Papers from the Ninth International Symposium on English Teaching, (pp.348-358). Taipei: The Crane publishing Co.
    Hunt, K. W. (1970). Syntactic maturity in school children and adults. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    Jacobs, G. (1986). Quickwriting: A technique for invention in writing. ELT Journal, 40(4), 282-290.
    James, M. O. (1993). L2 writing fluency: A pilot study. (Eric document Reproduction Service No. 335874)
    Jin, L. ＆ Cortazzzi, M. (1996). Changing patterns of questioning. Paper presented at the 5th International Symoposium on Teaching English, National Taiwan Normal University.
    Jude, G. (1999). Freewriting for fun and fluency. TLT Online Editor [On-line].
    Available: http://langue.hyper.chubu.ac.jp/jalt/pub/tlt/99/aug/sh_jude.html
    Kameen, P. T. (1984). Syntactic skill and ESL writing quality. In A. Freedman, I. Pringle ＆ J. Yalden (Eds.), Learning to write: First language/second language (2nd ed., pp.162-170). London and New York: Longman.
    Kann, C. L. (2001). The effects of gender on Internet-assisted English writing instruction for senior high school students. Unpolished master’s thesis, University of National Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan.
    Keller, M.A. (1992). Responding to students’ writing: A pilot study. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. 335874)
    Kelly, L. (1981). Learner-teacher dialogues and writing that is learning. English Journal, 70(5), 26-29.
    Kirby D. R. ＆ Kantor, K. J. (1984). Toward a theory of developmental rhetoric. In A. Freedman, I. Pringle ＆ J. Yalden (Eds.), Learning to write: First language/second language (2nd ed., pp.87-97). London and New York: Longman.
    Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition.
    Oxford: Pergaman.
    Kreeft, J. (1984). Dialogue writing: Bridge from talk to essay writing. Language Arts, 61(2), 141-150.
    Kreeft, J. et al. (1985). Student-teacher interactive writing in the learning of English as a second language. (ERIC Document Production Service No. ED 252 097)
    Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: a quantitative approach. Language Learning, (40)3, 387-417.
    Li, C. C. (1992). Breaking the barrier of ESL writing. Taipei: the Crane publishing.
    Lucas, T. (1990).Personal journal writing as a classroom genre. In J. K. Peyton (Ed.) Students and Teachers Writing Together: Perspectives on Journals Writing (pp.99-123). Alexandria, Va.: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
    Macrorie, K. (1980). Telling writing (3rd ed.). NJ: Hayden Book.
    McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse, analysis for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    McGuire, B. S. (1990). Where does the teacher intervene with underachieving writers？ English Journal, 79(2), 14-21.
    Mcleod, S. (1987). Some thoughts about feelings: the affective domain and the writing process. College Composition and Communication, 38(4), 426-435.
    Meath-Lang B. (1990). The dialogue journal: Reconceiving curriculum and teaching. In J. K. Peyton (Eds.), Students and teachers writing together: Perspective on journal writing (pp.5-17). Alexandrai, VA : Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
    Mikkelsen, N. (1985). Teaching teachers: what I learn. Language Arts, 62(7),
    742-753.
    Miyashiro, L. (1991). The effects of journal writing of the writing of first, second , and third graders. Unpolished doctoral dissertation, United States International University.
    Morroy, R. (1985). Teacher strategies: Linguistic devices for sustaining interaction in dialogue journal writing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 3750A. (University Microfilms No. 87-02260)
    Morrow, L. M. (1993). Literacy development in the early years: Helping children read and write (2nd ed.). Boston: Alley and Bacon.
    Murray, D. M. (1978). Internal Revision: a process of discovery. In, C. Cooper and L. Odell (Eds.), Research on composition (pp.85-103). Urbana , IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
    Murray, D. M. (1987). Write to learn. Holt: The Dryden Press.
    Newkirk, T. (1984). Archimede’s dream. Language Arts, 66, 516-516.
    Peyton, J. K. (1986). Literacy through written interaction. Pasage: A Journal for Refugee Education, 2(1), 24-29.
    Peyton, J. K. (1990). Dialogue journal writing and the acquisition of English of English grammatical morphology. In J. K. Peyton (Ed.), Students and Teachers Writing Together: Perspectives on Journals Writing (pp.67-97). Alexandria, Va.: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
    Peyton, J. K. ＆ Seyoum, M. (1988). The effect of teacher strategies on students’ interactive writing: The case of dialogue journals. Research in the Teaching of English, 23. 310-334.
    Peyton, J. K. ＆ Staton, J. (1993). Dialogue Journals in the Multilingual Classroom: Building Language Skills Through Written Interaction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    Peyton, J. D., Staton, S. Richardson, G. ＆ Wolfram, W. (1993). The influence of writing task on ESL students’ written production. In J. K. Peyton ＆ J. Staton (Eds.), Dialogue journals in the multilingual classroom: Building language fluency and writing skills through written interaction (pp.196-221). Norwood, NJ: Albex.
    Popkin, D. (1985). Dialogue journals: A way to personalize communication in a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals, 18(2), 153-156.
    Raisman, N. (1982). I just can’t do English: Writing anxiety in the classroom. TETYC, 9(1), 19-23.
    Reid, L. (1997). Exploring the ways that dialogue journaling affects how and why students write: An action research project. Teaching and Change, 5(1), 50-57.
    Reyes, M. D. L. (1991). A process approach to literacy using dialogue journals and literature logs with second language learners. Research in the Teaching of English, 25. 291-313.
    Richard-Amato, P. A. (1996). Making it happen: Interaction in the second language classroom: From theory to practice (2nd ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley.
    Ross, S. Shortreed, I. M., ＆ Robb, T. N. (1988). First language pedagogy in the second language classroom: A reassessment. RELC Journal, 19(1), 29-48.
    Sampson, G. P. (1977). A real challenge to ESL methodology. TESOL Quarterly, 11(3), 241-255.
    Schatzberg-Smith, K. (1988). Effects of dialogue journal writing on study habits and attitudes of underprepared college students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hofstra University, New York.
    Schmeling, H. H. (1969). A study of the relationship between certain syntactic features and overall quality of college freshman writing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Peabody College for Teachers.
    Semke, H.D. (1984). The effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17, 195-202.
    Shuy, R. W. (1988). Sentence level language functions. In J. Staton, R. W. Shuy, J. K. Peyton, ＆ L. Reed, (Eds.), Dialogue journal communication: Classroom, linguistic, social and cognitive views (pp.107-142). Norwood, NJ: Albex.
    Soderlund, M. D. (1993). Classroom memos, creating purposeful dialogue. English Journal, 82(7), 55-57.
    Song, M. (1997). The effet of dialogue journal writing on writing quality, reading comprehension, and writing apprehension of ‘EFL college students. South Korea. (EDRS No. ED 410 766)
    Spack, R., ＆ Sadow, C. (1983). Student-teacher working journals in ESL freshman composition. TESOL Quarterly, 17(4), 575-593.
    Spanos, A. (1992). Discovery writing: How to explore it, map it and cultivate it well. Hispania, 75(2), 441-444.
    Staton, J. (1984). Acquiring practical reasoning through teacher-student interaction in dialogue journals. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 2767A. (University Microfilms No. 84-28577)
    Staton, J. (1988). ERIC/RCS report: dialogue journal. Language Arts, 65(2), 198-201.
    Staton, J. ＆ Peyton, J. K. (Eds.). (1996). Writing our lives: Reflection on dialogue journal writing with adults learning English. Washington, DC and McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
    Staton, J. ＆ Shuy, R. W. (1988). Dialogue Journal Communication: Classroom, Linguistic, Social, and Cognitive Views. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    Takagi, A. (2001). The need for change in English writing instruction in Japan. The Language Teacher, 25(7), [On-line]. Available: http://langue.hyper.chubu.ac.jp/jalt/pub/tlt/01/jul/takagi.html
    Thompson, M. O. (1983). The returning student: Writing anxiety and general anxiety. TETYC, 10(1), 35-39.
    Travis, P ＆ Slocumb, L. (1997). Language experience approach [On-line]. Available: Http://www.med.ufl.edu/mdpt/resources/LnaguageExperienceQpproach.htm
    Tung, C. T. (1995). Can dialogue journal writing help ESL students develop writing skills？ Unpublished master’s thesis, Arizon State University, Arizon.
    Turewicz, E. (1983). Dialogue journal writing in the secondary school. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 248 714)
    Turpe, A. L. (2001). Prewriting practice. [On-line]. Available: http://www.bridgewater.edu/~atrupe/ENG315/presriting.htm
    Ulanoff, S. (1994). Dialogue journals writing and mediated development of writing: how do second language learners engaged in authentic writing activities develop as writers？ (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 360 849)
    Vanett, L. ＆ Jurich, D. ( 1990). A context for collaboration: Teachers and students writing together. In J. K. Peyton (Eds.), Students and teachers writing together: Perspective on journal writing (pp.51-62). Alexandrai, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
    Vavra, E. (2000). Dr. Ed Vavra’s KISS approach to sentence structure. [On-line]. Available: http://nweb.pct.edu/homepage/staff/evavra/ED498/Essay009_Def_Tunit.htm
    Vogotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of Higher Psychological Process. Cambridge.: Harvard University.
    White, R. ＆ Arndt, V. (1992). Process writing (3rd ed.). London and New York: Longman.
    Widdowson, H. G. (1984). New starts and different kinds of failure. In A. Freedman, I. Pringle, ＆ J. Yalden(Eds.), Learning to Writing: first language/ Second language (pp.34-47). London and New York: Longman.
    Worthington, L. (1997). Let’s not show the teacher: EFL students’ secret exchange journals. Forum, 35(3), 2-7.
    Wurr, A. J. (2002). Language experience approach revisited: The use of personal narratives in adult L2 literacy instruction. The Reading Matrix [On-line], 2(1). Available: http://www.readingmatrix.come/articles/wurr/
    Yang, C. W. (1995). 筆談(D.J)與班級英文報－頑皮報[Dialogue journal writing and interclass newsletter]. 英語教學, 19(3), 47-52.
    Zamel, V. (1982). Writing: The process of discovering meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 16(2), 195-208.
    Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17(2), 165-187.

    QR CODE