簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 邱獻輝
Shiann-Huei, Chiou
論文名稱: 青少年家長「親子溝通諮詢團體」之效果研究
The Study for the Effect of Parent-Adolescent Communication Consultation Group
指導教授: 鄔佩麗
Wu, Pei-Li
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2000
畢業學年度: 88
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 242
中文關鍵詞: 諮詢親子溝通團體焦點團體婚姻與家庭系統環繞模式家長諮詢
英文關鍵詞: consultation, Parent-Adolescent Communication, group, focus group, Circumplex Model of Marital and Family System, parent consultation
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:376下載:95
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 摘 要
    本研究旨在建立「學校──家庭」合作協助青少年的專業途徑,藉著提昇家長正向溝通能力,有效解決親子溝通困擾。研究者根據「婚姻與家庭系統環繞模式」的溝通概念、與諮詢理論的概念,自行設計親子溝通諮詢團體方案,以海山高工學生二十二位家長為研究對象,分為A、B兩團體,A團體有十二位成員,B團體有十位成員,每週聚會一次,每次二小時,由研究者親自帶領,並接受督導。方案效果評估包括量化、與質化資料的前後測比較,量化資料工具包括「親子溝通困擾檢核表」、「親子溝通問卷(家長版)」、「親子溝通問卷(子女版)」,在α<.05的標準下,分別進行t檢定;質化資料的來源包括「成員焦點團體」、「成員之子女焦點團體」,以內容分析方式比較前後測差異。
    本研究所獲得的結論如下:
    一、22位成員在「親子溝通問卷(家長版)」之「正向溝通總分」前測得分平均數M=19.23、標準差S=6.91、最大值33、最小值8,後測得分M=25.73、S=9.61、最大值42、最小值10。進行前後測得分差異之相依樣本t考驗,結果t= -7.565,P<.05,顯示後測平均得分顯著高於前測,亦即成員參與本研究方案之後,比較能夠使用正向溝通技巧來處理青少年子女的問題。
    二、就焦點團體逐字稿內容分析結果來看,成員在正向溝通技巧方面比較有進步者,可歸納出六個主題,包括「尊重孩子的需求」、「引導行為」、「同理心」、「增強行為」、「彈性態度」、與「情緒的覺察與控制」。
    三、22位成員在「親子溝通問卷(家長版)」之「負向溝通總分」前測得分M=6.55、S=4.17、最大值16、最小值0,後測得分M=4.09、S=4.98、最大值18、最小值0。進行前後測得分差異之相依樣本t考驗,結果t=1.94,P<.05,顯示後測平均得分顯著低於前測,亦即成員參與本研究方案後,對青少年子女的困擾議題,比較能夠避免使用負向溝通的方式處理問題。
    四、就內容分析結果來看,成員在負向溝通方式有減少者,可歸納出四個主題,包括「避免說教」、「避免指責」、「避免權威禁令」、與「降低主題干預」。
    五、22位成員在「親子溝通問卷(家長版)」之「問卷總分」前測得分M=92.68、S=10.58、最大值113、最小值74,後測得分M=101.64、S=13.57、最大值122、最小值78。進行前後測得分差異之相依樣本t考驗,結果t= -2.67、P<.05,顯示後測平均得分顯著高於前測,亦即成員參加本研究方案後,對於青少年子女的困擾議題,比較能夠進行積極溝通、有效處理問題。
    六、22位成員之子女在「親子溝通問卷(子女版)」中的得分M=6.00、S=2.09、最大值10、最小值2,以單一樣本t檢定來考驗平均值是否大於5,結果t=2.24、P<.05,顯示子女選擇「希望成員採用參與本研究方案後的溝通方式」,顯著高於隨機選擇機率,亦即本研究團體可促使成員使用其子女所喜歡的溝通方式。
    七、成員在「親子溝通困擾檢核表」中「嚴重程度」的前測分數M=11.59、S=6.51、最大值26、最小值2,平均分數隨著團體的進展而不斷下降,後測分數M=5.77、S=5.10、最大值18、最小值0。進行前後測得分差異之相依樣本t考驗,結果t= 7.565、P<.05,顯示後測平均分數顯著低於前測,亦即親子溝通諮詢團體能有效協助成員解決求詢的親子溝通問題。
    八、成員在「親子溝通困擾檢核表」中「困擾程度」的前測分數M=11.00、S=6.86、最大值25、最小值2,平均分數隨著團體的進展而不斷下降,後測分數M=6.45、S=4.65、最大值18、最小值1。進行前後測得分差異之相依樣本t考驗,結果t=6.07、P<.05,顯示後測平均分數顯著低於前測,亦即親子溝通諮詢團體能有效的降低成員所求詢的親子溝通困擾。
    九、就內容分析結果而言,成員親子溝通困擾議題的解決情況,可歸納出六個主題,包括「青少年次文化」、「交友問題」、「與家人的互動」、「學業問題」、「行為問題」、以及「沒有改變」。
    最後根據本研究結果及文獻進行討論,以作為學校──家庭合作協助學子、諮詢實務、與未來研究的進一步建議。

    The Study for the Effect of Parent-Adolescent Communication Consultation Group
    By Shiann-Huei, Chiou
    Abstract
    The purpose of this study is to construct a cooperative and professional bridge between “school-family” so as to help adolescents, then to enhance the positive communicational ability of parents, and to resolve parent-adolescent communicational troubles effectively. It is based the communicational conception of “Circumplex Model of Marital and Family System” and the conception of consultation to design Parent-Adolescent Communication Consultation Group. Twenty-two parents of National Hai-San Industrial Vocational High School participated in this study. There were 12 parents selected to attend Group A, and the other 10 parents attended Group B. Group members met once a week, and it took them two hours per section. These two groups were led by the researcher with supervision. The effect of the communication consultation groups was assessed by pretest-posttest design included both quantitative and qualitative datas. The former, obtained from instruments including “Parent-Adolescent Communicational Trouble Check List”, “Parent-Adolescent Communicational Inventory (for Parent)”, “Parent-Adolescent Communi-cational Inventory (for Adolescence)”, were analyzed by t-test to test the hypotheses, which α<.05; the latter, obtained from “Member Focus Group”、and “Adolescent Focus Group”, were transcribed first, and then were processed by content analysis to compare the difference of pre-post groups.
    The major findings were as follows:
    1. The 22 members’ arithmetic mean M=19.23, standard deviation S=6.91, maximal value is 33, and minimal value is 8, referring to the pre-groups, in “positive communication” of “Parent-Adolescent Communicational Inventory (for Parent)” . And, referring to the post-groups, M=25.73, S=9.61, maximal value is 42, and minimal value is 20. After one-tail dependent event t test, t=-7.565, P<.05, it shows the mean score of post-groups were higher than the scores of pre-groups significantly. It means that the members adopt more positive communicational skills to handle adolescent problems, after attending the groups.
    2. The members improve more significantly in positive communicational skills, which is based analyzing the transcript content “Member focus group” and “Adolescent Focus Group”, and it could be classified into six categories, including: “the respect for need of children”, “the skill of leading”, “empathy”, “the skill of enforcement ”, “the flexible attitude”, and “the awareness and control of emotion”.
    3. The 22 members’ arithmetic mean M=6.55, standard deviation S=4.17, maximal value is 16, and minimal value is 0, referring to the pre-groups, in “negative communication” of “Parent-Adolescent Communicational Inventory (for Parent)” . And, referring to the post-groups, M=4.09, S=4.98, maximal value is 18, and minimal value is 0. After one-tail dependent event t test, t=1.94, P<.05, it shows the mean score of post-groups were lower than the scores of pre-groups significantly. It means that the members were inclined to avoid negative communicational fashions to handle adolescent problems, after attending the groups.
    4. The member decreasingly use in negative communicational fashions, which is based analyzing the transcript content “Member focus group” and “Adolescent Focus Group”, and it could be classified into four categories, including: “the avoidance of preach”, “the avoidance of blame”, “the avoidance of autocracy”, and “theme interference reduction”.
    5. The 22 members’ arithmetic mean M=92.68, standard deviation S=10.58, maximal value is 113, and minimal value is 74, referring to the pre-groups, in “Parent-Adolescent Communicational Inventory (for Parent)” . And, referring to the post-groups, M=101.64, S=13.57, maximal value is 122, and minimal value is 78. After one-tail dependent event t test, t=2.24, P<.05, it shows the mean score of post-groups were higher than the scores of pre-groups significantly. It means that the members were capable to adopt communicational skills to handle adolescent problems, after attending the groups .
    6. After the members attended the groups, the members’ communication fashions were more acceptable by children than the communication fashions selected at random in “Parent-Adolescent Communicational Inventory (for Adolescence)”. This showed that the groups of this study could help members adopted communication fashions which their children preferred.
    7. The 22 members’ arithmetic mean M=11.59, standard deviation S=6.51, maximal value is 26, and minimal value is 2, referring to the pre-groups, in “trouble level” of “Parent-Adolescent Communicational Trouble Check List” With the development of the groups, the scores decreased gradually; And, referring to the post-groups, M=5.77, S=5.10, maximal value is 18, and minimal value is 0. After one-tail dependent event t test, t=7.565, P<.05; it shows that the mean score of the post-groups were lower than those of the pre-groups. That is, Parent-Adolescent Communication Consultation Group could effectively decrease the members’ troubles between parents and adolescents.
    8. The 22 members’ arithmetic mean M=11.00, standard deviation S=6.86, maximal value is 25, and minimal value is 2, referring to the pre-groups, in “trouble level” of “Parent-Adolescent Communicational Trouble Check List” With the development of the groups, the scores decreased gradually; And, referring to the post-groups, M=6.45, S=4.65, maximal value is 18, and minimal value is 1. After one-tail dependent event t test, t=6.07, P<.05; it shows that the mean score of the post-groups were lower than those of the pre-groups. It suggests that Parent-Adolescent Communication Consultation Group could effectively resolve the members’ problems between parents and adolescents.
    9. The parent-adolescent communicational troubles decreased which is based analyzing the transcript content “Member focus group” and “Adolescent Focus Group”, which were classified into five categories, including: “Adolescent culture”, “personal relationship troubles”, “the interaction in the family”, “school behavioral troubles”, “behavioral troubles” and “no change.”
    Finally, the results and findings of this study were fully discussed in order to provide propositions for the cooperation between “school-family” so as to help adolescents、for counseling practice、and for future research.

    目 錄 第壹章、 緒論 第一節、 研究動機與目的……………………………………………1 第二節、 研究問題……………………………………………………5 第三節、 研究假設……………………………………………………5 第四節、 名詞定義……………………………………………………6 第貳章、 文獻探討 第一節、 親子溝通概念之探討………………………………………8 第二節、 諮詢的基本概念……………………………………………18 第三節、 諮詢的模式…………………………………………………25 第四節、 學校親子溝通諮詢團體的實施……………………………33 第五節、 親子溝通諮詢團體的相關研究……………………………44 第六節、 焦點團體研究法……………………………………………49 第參章、 研究方法 第一節、 研究架構……………………………………………………52 第二節、 研究參與者…………………………………………………55 第三節、 研究工具……………………………………………………59 第四節、 資料分析……………………………………………………91 第五節、 研究步驟……………………………………………………95 第肆章、 研究結果 第一節、 親子溝通詢團體的效率性…………………………………99 第二節、 親子溝通諮詢團體的問題解決功能………………………119 第三節、 成員及其子女改變案例舉嵎………………………………138 第伍章、 討論 第一節、 親子溝通諮詢團體效率性之討論…………………………148 第二節、 親子溝通諮詢團體問題解決功能之討論…………………154 第三節、 團體歷程的省思……………………………………………164 第四節、 親子溝通諮詢團體效果的綜合討論………………………176 第陸章、 結論與建議 第五節、 結論…………………………………………………………178 第六節、 研究限制與建議……………………………………………180 參考文獻 (一)中文部分………………………………………………………193 (二)英文部分………………………………………………………196 附錄一…………………………………………………………………210 附錄二…………………………………………………………………212 附錄三…………………………………………………………………216 附錄四…………………………………………………………………218 附錄五…………………………………………………………………219 附錄六…………………………………………………………………220 附錄七…………………………………………………………………226 附錄八…………………………………………………………………230 附錄九…………………………………………………………………231 附錄十…………………………………………………………………235 附錄十一………………………………………………………………236 附錄十二………………………………………………………………239 附錄十三………………………………………………………………240 附錄十四………………………………………………………………242

    參考文獻
    (一) 中文部分
    中國輔導學會會員專業倫理守則(民79):輔導月刊,第25卷,1-2期,4~13頁。
    方炳林(民79):教學原理。台北市:教育文物出版社。
    朱昆中(民85):青少年所覺知的親子溝通與其自我觀念、生活適應之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導學研究所碩士論文。(未出版)
    吳武典(民82):輔導的基本理念。載於吳武典主編:輔導原理。台北市:心理出版社。
    吳就君編譯(民75):家庭治療──入門。台北市:大洋出版社。
    周文欽(民84):溝通分析諮商法。載於賴保禎、金樹人、周文欽、張德聰:諮商理論與技術。台北:國立空中大學。
    林玉慈(民88):親子溝通品質與青少年生活適應、偏差行為之相關研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。(未出版)
    林良姿(民80):親子溝通型態對兒童焦慮之相關研究。私立中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。(未出版)
    林美珠、蔡憶萍、王麗斐(民88):我國國小輔導人員「諮詢」概念認知之初探。中華輔導學報,5期,pp.119~149。
    胡幼慧(民85):焦點團體法。載於胡幼慧主編:質性研究──理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北市:巨流圖書公司。
    孫毓英(民75):親子互動模式與青少年社會關係之研究。私立中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。(未出版)
    翁樹澍(民79):親子互動模式對青少年心理社會福利感之影響研究。私立中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。(未出版)
    張春興(民78):張氏心理學辭典。台北市:東華書局。
    張春興(民80):現代心理學。台北市:東華書局。
    陳秉華(民83):諮商改變歷程的研究新典範。國立彰化師範大學諮商歷程研究學術研討會論文。(未出版)
    許月雲(民78):反映式溝通親職教育方案之效果研究。國立台灣師範大學家政教育研究所。(未出版)
    梁瑞安(民79):國小教師組織溝通、角色壓力與組織承諾關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    連廷嘉(民87):國民小學教師諮詢需求與意願之研究。高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。(未出版)
    曾端真(民85):婚姻與家族治療。台北市:天馬文化事業公司。
    黃月霞(民80): 團體諮商。台北市:五南圖書出版公司。
    黃郁婷(民84):親子溝通、因應方式與老年人幸福感之關係。私立中國文化大學家政研究所碩士論文。(未出版)
    葉光輝(民84):社會化歷程中的父母教化方式與子女的行為發展。中華心理學期刊,37卷,2期,149~167頁。
    鄔佩麗(民87a):「淡水區八十七學年度 國中教師基礎輔導知能研習──教師諮詢訓練工作坊」教材。(未出版)
    鄔佩麗(民87b):青少年心理發展與適應之整合性研究──教師與學生家長之合作關係與諮詢角色之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃。
    鄔佩麗(民88):性侵害被害人心理重建輔導人員訓練方案發展研究。內政部委託研究計劃。
    楊金滿(民84):家庭互動關係與青少年自我統合發展之研究。私立中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。(未出版)
    台北縣政府(民88):淡水區八十七學年度 國中教師基礎輔導知能研習──教師諮詢訓練工作坊手冊。(未出版)
    台灣省教育廳(民88):台灣省高級中學輔導工作輔導團八十八年度「團員督導研習」活動手冊。(未出版)
    蔡素妙(民79):高中、高職導師對輔導室諮詢服務的期望、諮詢模式偏好與滿意度知調查研究。彰化師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。(未出版)
    蔡憶萍(民86):國民小學輔導工作諮詢現況之研究。花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所論文。
    謝文全(民77):教育行政──理論與實務。台北市:文景出版社。
    謝秀芬(民78):家庭與家庭服務:家庭整體為中心的福利之研究。台北市:五南圖書出版公司。
    魏美芬(民74):親子溝通與青少年生活適應之研究──以台中市立雙十國中為例。私立東海大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
    (二) 英文部分
    American Association for Counseling and Development. (1988). Ethical Standards (rev. ed.). Alexandria, VA: Ahthor.
    American Association for Counseling and Development. (1996). Ethical Standards (rev. ed.). Alexandria, VA: Ahthor.
    Americal Psychology Association. (1992). Ethical Principles of Psychology. Washington, DC: Ahthor.
    Alexander, J. E. (1973). Defensive and supportive communication in criminal and deviant families. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, v.40 pp.223~231.
    Alpert, J. L. (1981). Conceptual Bases of Mental Health Consultation in the Schools. In M. J. Curtis, & J. E. Zins (Eds.), The Theory and Practice of School Consutation. pp.19~26. Springfield, Ill: Charles C Thomas.
    Amatae, E. S. & Fabric, F. (1984). Moving a Family into Therapy: Critical Referral Issues for the School Counselor. School Counselor, V.31, pp.285~294.
    Bergan, J. R. & Kratochwill, T. R. (1990). Behavioral Consultation and Therapy. New York: Plenum Press.
    Barnes, H. L. (1989). Cross-Generational Coalitions, Discrepant Perceptions and Family Functioning. In D. H. Olson, C. S. Russell, & D. H. Sprenkle (Eds.) Circumplex Model: Systemic Assessment and Treatment of Families (pp.175~198). Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press.
    Becher, R. M. (1986). Parent involvement: A Review of Research and Principles of Successful Practice. In L. G. Katz (Ed.), Current Topics in Early Childhood Education, V.6, pp.85~122.
    Bergan, J.R. & Duley, S. (1981). Behavioral Consultation with Family. In R. W. Henderson (Ed.), Parent-child interaction : theory, research, and prospects. (pp.265~291). New York : Academic Press.
    Bloss, K. K. (1995). School-Based Family Interventions: Current and Preferred Practices of School Counselors. (Doctoral Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro), AAC 9531825 ProQuest-Dissertation Abstracts.
    Brehm, K. E. (1989). The Effects of Consultee’s Problem Formulation on The Problem Identification Process of Expert Consultants. (Doctoral Dissertation, Texas Woman’s University ), AAC 9008482 ProQuest-Dissertation Abstracts.
    Brown, D., Wyne, M., Blackburn, J. and Powell, W. (1979). Consultation: Strategy for Improving Education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Brown, D., Pryzwansk, W. B., & Schulte, A.C. (1991). Psychological Consultation: Introduction to Theory and Practice (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
    Brown, D., Pryzwansk, W. B., & Schulte, A.C. (1995). Psychological Consultation: Introduction to Theory and Practice (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
    Bundy, M. L., & Poppen, W. A. (1986). School Counselor Effectiveness as Consultant: A Research Review. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling. V.20, pp.215~222.
    Busse, R. T. (1996), The Influence of Verbal Interactions During Behavioral Consultation on Treatment Outcome. (Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin-Medison), AAC 9634569 ProQuest-Dissertation Abstracts.
    Caplan, G. & Caplan, R. B. (1993). Mental Health Consultation and Collaboration. San Francisco CA.: Jossey-Bass Publication.
    Carrington Rotto, P. J. (1993). Competency-Based Parent Consultation and Training to Modify Noncompliance in Young Children (Parent Training, Behavioral Consultation) (Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin-Madison), AAC 9332668 ProQuest-Dissertation Abstracts.
    Conoley, J. C. (1987). Strategic Family Intervention. Three Cases of School-Aged Children. School Psychology Review, V.16, pp.469-486.
    Conoley, J. C., & Conoley, C. W. (1992). School Consultation Practice and Training (2nd ed.) Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
    Corey, G. (1991). Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy.(4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
    Corey, G., Corey, M. S., Callanan, P. & Russell, J. M. (1992). Group Techniques(2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
    Corey, G., Corey, M. S., & Callanan, P. (1993). Issues and Ethics in the Helping Professions. Pacific Grove, California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
    Corey, G. (1995). Theory and Practice of Group Counseling.(4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
    Crabtree, B. J. & Miller, W. L. (1992). A Template Approach to Text Analysis: Developing and Using Codebook. In Benjamin F. Crabtree, & William L. Miller. (eds.) Doing Qualitative Research. pp.93~109. Newbury, CA: Sage Publication Inc.
    Dinkmyeyer, D., Carlson, J., & Dinkmyer, D., (1994). Consultation: School Mental Health Professionals As Consultant. Indiana: Accelerated Development Inc.
    Dougherty, A.M. (1990). Consultation: Practice and Perspectives. Pacific Grove, California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
    Dougherty, A.M. (1995). Consultation: Practice and Perspectives in School and Community. Pacific Grove, California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
    Downing, J. C. (1983). A Positive Way to Help Families. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, V.17, pp.208~213.
    Downing, J., & Downing, S. (1991). Consultation with Resistant Parents. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, V.25, pp.296~301.
    Dowling, E. (1994). Theoretical Framework: A Joint Systems Approach to Education Problems with Children. In Emilia Dowling & Elsie Osborne (Eds.) The Family and the School: A Joint Systems Approach to Problems with Children (2nd ed) pp.1~29. Londond: Routledge.
    Downing, J. & Harrison, T. (1991). Parents' Tough Beat and the School Counselor. School Counselor; v39 n2 p91-97 .
    Eccles, J. S. & Harold, R. D. (1993). Parents- School Involvement During the Early Adolenscent Years. Teachers College Record. V.94, n3, pp.568~587.
    Endes, R. B. (1995). The Role of Irrational Beliefs in Behavioral Consultation: Implications for Treatment Outcomes. (Doctoral Dissertation, Hofstra University ), AAC 9543288 ProQuest-Dissertation Abstracts.
    Epstein, J. L. (1985). Home and School Connections in Schools of the Future: Implications of Research on Parent Involvement. Peabody Journal of Education, V.62, pp.18~41.
    Fine, M. J. (1992). A Systems-Ecological Perspective on Home-School Intervention. In M. J. Fine, & C. Carlson (Eds.) Boston: Allyn Bacon.
    Gazda,G. M. (1984). Group Counseling: A Developmental Approach (3rd.). Boston: Allyn Bacon.
    Gazda,G. M. (1989). Group Counseling: A Developmental Approach(4th.). Boston: Allyn Bacon.
    Gerler, E. R. (1992). Consultation and School Counseling. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, V.26, p162.
    Goldenberg, I. & Goldenberg, H. (1981). Family Systems and the School Counselor. School Counselor V.28, pp.165~177.
    Goldenberg, I. & Goldenberg, H. (1996). Family Therapy: An Overview (4th.). Pacific Grove CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
    Goldstein, A. P. (1981). Psychological Skill Training: The Structured Learning Technique. New York: Pergamon Press.
    Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (1986). School Effects. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), The Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd., pp.570~604). New York: Macmillan.
    Gorall, D. M. & Olson, D. H. (1995). Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems: Intergrating Ethnic Diversity and Other Social Systems. In R. H. Mikesell, D. Lusterman, & S. H. McDaniel (Eds.) Intergrating Family Therapy (pp.217~233). Washington: American Psychological Association.
    Gresham F. M. & Kendell, G.K., (1987). School Consultation Research: Methodological Critique and Future Research Directions. School Psychology Review, V.16, pp.306~316.
    Gutkin, T. B. (1981). Relative Frequency of Consultee Lack of Knowledge, Skill, Confidence, and Objectivity in School Settings. Journal of School Psychology, V.19, N.1 ,pp.57~61.
    Gutkin, T. B., & Curtis, M. J. (1990). School-based Consultation: Theory Techniques, and research. In T. B. Gutkin and C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), The Handbook of School Psychology (2nd., pp. 577~613). New York: Wiley.
    Gutkin, T. B. (1993). Conducting Consultation Research. In J. E. Zins, T. R. Kratochwill, & S. N. Elliott (Eds.), Handbook of Consultation Services for Children, (pp. 227~243). San Francisco CA.: Jossey-Bass.
    Hansen, D. A. (1986). Family-School Articulations: The Effects of Interaction Rule Mismatch. American Education Research Journal, V.23, pp.643~659.
    Hansen, J. C., Himes, B. S., & Meier, S. (1990). Consultation: Concepts and Practices. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.
    Harrar, W. R., VandeCreek, L., & Knapp, S. (1990). Ethical and Leagl Aspects of Clinical Supervision. Professional Psychology: Rearch and Practice, v21, n1, pp.37~41.
    Jacobs, E. E., Harvill, R. L., & Masson, R. L. (1994). Group Counseling: Strategies and Skills (2nd.). Pacific Grove CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
    Jefferson, C. (1998). Factors That Impact Parents’ Engagement and Treatment Outcome in a School –Linked Parent Consultation Intervention for Aggressive Children. (Doctoral Dissertation, Texas A & M University), AAC 9915245 ProQuest-Dissertation Abstracts.
    Jurowicz, J. W. (1982). Consultation Training in Counselor Education: North Central Region. (Doctoral Dissertation, Loyola University of Chicago), AAC 9221296 ProQuest-Dissertation Abstracts.
    Kahnweiler, W. M. (1979). The school Counselor as Consultant: A Historical Review. Personnel and Guidance Journal. V.57, 8, pp.374~380.
    Keller, H.R. (1981). Behavior consultation. In J. C. Conoley (Eds.), Consultation in the Schools: Theory, Research, Procedures. pp.59~99. New York, N.Y.: Academic Press.
    Kerwin, M., & Rhoads, J. (1996). Improving Teaching Through a Peer Support “Teacher Consultation Porcess.”
    Kirk, J. Miller, M. L.(1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Beverly Hills :Sage Publications.
    Kottman, T., & Wilborn, B. L. (1992). Parents Helping Parents: Multipling the Counselor’s Effectiveness. School Counselor, V.40, pp.10~14.
    Lynn. L. (1994). Building Parent Involvement. Brief, V.3, pp.1~5. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED366094)
    Mahrer, A. R. (1988). Discovery-Orientated Psycholotherapy Research. American Psychologist, V.43, 9, pp.594~702.
    Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, v98, pp.224~253.
    Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1994). A Collective Fear of the Collectives: Implications for Selves and Theories of selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, v20, pp.568~579.
    Medway, F. J. (1979). How Effect is School Consultation: A Review of Recent Research. Journal of School Psychology. V.17, 3, pp.275~282.
    Meyers, J. (1981). Mental Health Consultation. In J. C. Cononley (Ed.), Consultation in the Schools Theory, Research and Procedures. pp.35~58. New York, NY: Academic Press.
    Meyers, J., Alpert, J. L., & Fleisher, B. D. (1983). Models of Consultation. In J.L. Alpert, & J. Meyers (Eds.) Training in Consultation: Perspectives form Mental Health, Behavioral and Organizational Consultation (pp.5~16). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publisher.
    Meyers, J., Gaughan, E., & Pitt, N. (1990). Contributions of Community Psychology to School Psychology. In T. B. Gutkin and C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), The Handbook of School Psychology (2nd., pp. 198~217). New York: Wiley.
    Miller, W. L. & Crabtree, B. F. (1992). Primary Care Reseach: A Multimethod Typology and Qualitative Road Moad. In Benjamin F. Crabtree, & William L. Miller. (eds.) Doing Qualitative Research. pp.3~28. Newbury, CA: Sage Publication Inc.
    Morgan, D. L. (1992). Doctor-Care-giver Relationships: An Exploration Using Focus Groups. In Benjamin F. Crabtree, & William L. Miller. (eds.) Doing Qualitative Research. pp.205~230. Newbury, CA: Sage Publication Inc.
    Mucha, L. (1994). A Survey of Teacher Perceptions of School Psychologists as Consultant: A Factor Analytic Study of Evaluation in the Consultation Process.
    Myers, L. W. (1996). Conjoint Behavior Consultation as an Intervention for Young Children With Disruptive Behaviors. (Doctoral Dissertation, North Carolina State University), AAC 9715547 ProQuest-Dissertation Abstracts.
    Myrick, R. D. (1993). Developmental Guidance and Counseling: A Practical Approach(2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Educational Media Corporation.
    Nichol, G. T. (1984). Effects of a Parent Consultation Intervention on Self-Control Behavior of First and Second Grade Students (Self-Instructions). (Doctoral Dissertation, Memphis State University), AAC 8424590 ProQuest-Dissertation Abstracts.
    Nicoll, W. G. (1984). School Counselors as Family Counselors. School Counselor, V.31, pp.373~380.
    Nicoll, W. G. (1992). A Family Counseling and Consultation Model for School Counselors. School Counselor, v.39, pp.351~361.
    Olson, D. H., McCubbin, H. I., Barnes, H., Larsen, A., Muxen, M., & Wilson, M. (1983). Families: What makes Them Work. Los Angeles: SAGE Publishing.
    Olson, D. H., Russell, C., & Sprenkle, D. (1983). Circumplex Model VI: Theoretical Update. Family Process. V.18, pp.3~28.
    Olson, D. H., & Barnes, H. L. (1985). Parent-adolescent Communication and the Circumplex Model. Children Development. V.56, 2, pp.438~447.
    Olson, D. H. (1989). Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems VIII: Family Assessment and Intervention. In D. H. Olson, C. S. Russell, & D. H. Sprenkle (Eds.) Circumplex Model: Systemic Assessment and Treatment of Families (pp.7~49). Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press.
    Olson, D. H. (1993a). Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems: Assessing Family Functions. In F. Walsh (2nd , Eds.) Normal Family Process (pp.104~137). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
    Olson, D. H. (1993b). Family Continuity and Change: A Family Life-Cycle Perspective. In T. H. Brubaker (Eds.) Family Relations: Challenges for the Future. (pp.17~40). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Press.
    Olson, D. H. (1994). Commentary -- Curvilinearity: The World is not Flat. Family Process. V.33, pp.471~478.
    Olson, D. H. (1995). Family Systems: Understanding Your Roots. In R. D. Day, K. R. Gilbert, B. H. Settles, & W. R. Burr (Eds.) Research and Theory in Family Science (pp.131~153). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
    Polsgrove, L. & McNeil, M. (1989). The Consultation Process: Research and Practice. Remedial and Special Education. V.10, 1, pp.6~13.
    Ponti, C. R., & Flower, J. C., (1993). Consulting in Elementary and Secondary Schools. In J. E. Zins, T. R. Kratochwill, & S. N. Elliott (Eds.), Handbook of Consultation Services for Children, (pp. 277~290). San Francisco CA.: Jossey-Bass.
    Partin, R. L. (1993). School Counselor’s Time: Where does it go? School Counselor. V.40, pp.274~281.
    Polkinghore, D. E. (1997). Qualitative Procedures For Counseling Research. In C. E. Watkins, & L. J. Schneider: Research in Counseling. pp.163~204 (eds.) NY. LEA.: Hillsdale
    Pryzwansky, W. B. (1986). Indirect Service Delivery: Conseiderations for Future Research in Consultation. School Psychology Review. V.15, pp.479~488.
    Remley, T. P. (1993). Consultation Contracts. Journal of Counseling & Development. V.72, pp.157~158.
    Reynolds, C. R., Gutkin, T. B., Elliott, S. N. & Witt, J.C. (1984). In School Psychology: Essentials of Theory and Practice. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Rhoades, M. M. (1993). Parent as Mangers of Homework Intervention: An Empirical Analysis. (Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin-Madison), AAC 9331280 ProQuest-Dissertation Abstracts.
    Ritchie, M. H. (1982). Parental Consultations. School Counselor, V.29, N.5, pp.402~410.
    Ruben, B. D. (1988). Communication and Human Behavior(2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
    Russell, M. L. (1981). Behavioral Consultation: Theory and Process. In M. J. Curtis, & J. E. Zins (Eds.), The Theory and Practice of School Consutation. pp. 27~37. Springfield, Ill: Charles C Thomas.
    Schatz, E. M., & Sanborn, M. S. (1980). Some Pragmatics of Parent Consultation. Roeper Review, V.3, n.1, pp.40~43.
    Sheridan, S. M., & Kratochwill, T. R. (1992). Behavioral Parent- Teacher Consultation: Conceptual and Research Consideration. Journal of School Psychology. V30, pp.117~139.
    Sheridan, S. M. (1993). Models for Working with Parents. In J. E. Zins, T. R. Kratochwill, & S. N. Elliott (Eds.), Handbook of consultation services for children : applications in educational and clinical settings. pp.110~133. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
    Sherry, P. (1991). Ethical Issues in the Conduct of Supervision. The Counseling Psychologist. V.19, 4, pp.566~584.
    Steck, M. C. (1994). Conjoint Behavioral Consultation: A National Survey of School Psychologists. (Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Utah), AAC 9514919 ProQuest-Dissertation Abstracts.
    Strother, J., & Jacobs, E. (1986). Parent Consultation: A Practiceal Approach. School Counselor, V.33, pp.292~296.
    Suh, E., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Triandis, H. C., (1998). The Sifting Basis of Life Satisfaction Judgements Across Cultures: Emotions versus Norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. V.74, n1, pp.482 ~ 493.
    Swap, S. M. (1993). Developing Home-School Partnerships: From Concepts to Practice. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
    Sweeney, T. J., Navin, S. L., & Myers, J.E. (1984). School counselor Education: Shipping Water of Shaping Up? School Counselor, V.31, pp.329~338.
    Taverne, A. F. (1992). Evaluating Behavioral Consultation as a Means of Promoting Reading in At-Risk Families. (Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Utah), AAC 9307314 ProQuest-Dissertation Abstracts.
    Thompson, R. A. (1986). A Comparison of Counselor, Principal, and Teacher Perceptions of the Role and Function of the School Counselor in Virginia Public Secondary Schools. (Doctoral Dissertation, The College of William and Mary), AAC 8627787 ProQuest-Dissertation Abstracts.
    Tombari, M. L. & Bergan, J. R (1978). Consultant Cues and Teacher Verbalizations, Judgements, and Expectancies Concerning Children’s Adjugement Problems. Journal of School Psychology, V.16, pp.212~219.
    Tokunaga, H. T. (1984). Ethical Issues in Consultation: An Evaluative Review. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, V.15, 6, pp.811~821.
    Trenholm, Sarah, & Jensen, Arthur, (1996). Interpersonal communication. (3rd ed). Belmont CA: Wadsworth Pub. Co.
    Trepper, T. S. & Sprenkle, D. H. (1989). The Clinicle Use of Circumplex Model in the Assessment and Treatment of Intrafamily Children Sexual Abuse. In D. H. Olson, C. S. Russell, & D. H. Sprenkle (Eds.) Circumplex Model: Systemic Assessment and Treatment of Families (pp.93~111). Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press.
    Trotzer, J. (1977). The Counselor and Group. Pacific Grove CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
    Walsh, F. & Olson, D. H. (1989). Utility of Circumplex Model Severely Dysfunctional Family Systems. In D. H. Olson, C. S. Russell, & D. H. Sprenkle (Eds.) Circumplex Model: Systemic Assessment and Treatment of Families (pp.7~49). Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press.
    Whiston, S. C., & Emerson, S. (1989). Ethical Implications for Supervisors in Counseling of Trainees, Counselor Education and Supervision, V.28, 4, pp.318~325.
    Wise, P. S., Lowery, S., & Silverglade, L. (1989). Personal Counseling for Counselor in Training: Guidelines for Supervisors. Counselor Education and Supervision, V.28, 4, pp.326~336.
    Worden, M. (1981). Classroom Behavior as a Function of the Family System. School Counselor V.28, pp.178~188.
    Yalom, I. D. (1985). The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy (3rd.). N.Y.: Basie Books.
    Zins, J. E., Kratochwill, T. R., & Elliott, S. N. (1993). Current Status of the Field. In J. E. Zins, T. R. Kratochwill, & S. N. Elliott (Eds.), Handbook of Consultation Services for Children, (pp. 1~14). San Francisco CA.: Jossey-Bass.

    QR CODE