隨著經濟迅速成長，大量的資源使用與工業生產，廢棄物的產生成為一個嚴重的社會與環境議題，在廢棄物產生形成社會成本之後，影響臺灣環境的永續發展與國民的健康福祉。有鑒於環境保護的重要，人們在環保意識逐漸高漲之際，廢棄物回收成為追求環境永續發展的重要指標。本論文研究的目的在探討臺北市民對於資源回收的意圖分析，根據統計，自民國89年臺北市家戶垃圾量每人每日垃圾量為1.12公斤，至民國104年則為0.37公斤。資源回收率也從2.4%增加至56.6%，家庭回收對於臺北市整體的垃圾處理功不可沒。
本研究依照Klöckner（2010）提出的行為決定模型（Comprehensive Action Determination Model, CADM）的架構與回收測量量表為主軸。探討臺北市居民的資源回收意圖之決定模型為何?是否根據理論可以斷定「覺知」、「態度」、「社會規範」、「回收習慣」、「個人規範」、「知覺行為控制」、「回收行為意圖」等七個變項對「回收行為」產生決定性之影響?本研究採取臺北市分區調查的模式，依照各區人口數，發放問卷調查，並採用結構方程式（SEM）進行路徑分析，探討各變項間之關係。
本研究以社會科學統計軟體（Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, SPSS）23.0 與LISRAL9.2進行統計分析研究，以差異分析找出個社會背景變項與回收行為之差異，以Klöckner（2010）的行為決定模型（Comprehensive Action Determination Model, CADM），以結構方程式模型（SEM）進行驗證性因素分析與路徑分析，適配符合臺北市民回收模型。在結果中將探討臺北市民回收的行為意圖。期許未來從人文環境、社會規範、或是從環境行政等制度方面進行政策調整方案，使得回收系統更臻完善。合理的利用資源，保護生態平衡並促進經濟持續發展。

關鍵字：資源回收、臺北市、回收行為、結構方程式模型

With the rapid economic growth, a great deal of resource utilization and industrial production has led to the emergence of waste as a serious social and environmental issues. The waste has caused the destruction of Taiwan's environment and the health of its citizens. Due to the rise of environmental awareness, recycling of waste has become an important indicator of the pursuit for sustainable development of the living environment. The purpose of the study is exploring the intention of the citizens in Taipei for resource recycling. According to the statistics, the amount of household refuse per person per day in Taipei for the Republic of China was 1.12 kg in 1990 and it decreased to 0.37 kg in 2015. The resource recovery rate also increased from 2.4% to 56.6%. Household recycling has contributed to the overall garbage disposal in Taipei.
The structure of the Comprehensive Action Determination Model.（CADM）proposed by Klöckner（2010）will be used to explore the Taipei citizens recycling intention. According to the theory, I will study the effects on “recycling behavior” of seven variables such as "awareness", "attitude", "social norms", "recycling habits", "personal norms", "perceptual behavior control", and "recycling behavioral intentions”. This study adopts the model of Taipei City District Survey, and the questionnaires according to the population of each district.The Structure Equation Modeling（SEM）is used for path analysis to explore the relationship between variables.
This study will be conducted by using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 23.0.and LISRAL9.2. I will find out the difference between a social background variable and recycling behavior. Klöckner's（2010）Comprehensive Action Determination Model (CADM) will be in line with the Taipei Residents Recycling Model. Using Structural Euqaton Modeling（SEM）to preform Confirmatory Factor Analysis（CFA）and Path Analysis.At the results, the behavioral intentions of Taipei residents will be explored. Use nature resources reasonably, Protect ecological balance, and promote sustainable economic development.

關鍵字：Recycling, Taipei City, Recycling behavior, Structural Equation Model

一、英文文獻
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. （2001）. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta‐analytic review. British journal of social psychology, 40(4), 471-499.
Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14-25.
Bamberg, S., Hunecke, M., & Blöbaum, A. (2007). Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation: Two field studies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(3), 190-203.
Bearden, W. O., & Woodside, A. G. (1978). Consumption occasion influence on consumer brand choice. Decision Sciences, 9(2), 273-284.
Bratt, C. (1999). The impact of norms and assumed consequences on recycling behavior. Environment and behavior, 31(5), 630-656.Carrus, G., Passafaro, P., & Bonnes, M. (2008). Emotions, habits and rational choices in ecological behaviours: The case of recycling and use of public transportation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(1), 51-62
Chan, L, & Bishop, B. (2013). A moral basis for recycling: Extending the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 96-102.
Cheung, S. F., Chan, D. K.-S., & Wong, Z. S.-Y. (1999). Reexamining the theory of planned behavior in understanding wastepaper recycling. Environment and Behavior, 31, 587-612.
Carrus, G., Passafaro, P., & Bonnes, M. (2008). Emotions, habits and rational choices in ecological behaviours: The case of recycling and use of public transportation. Journal of environmental psychology, 28(1), 51-62.
Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A.（1990）A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015-1026.
Dagher, G. K., & Itani, O. (2014). Factors influencing green purchasing behaviour: Empirical evidence from the Lebanese consumers. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 13(3), 188-195.
Doran, R., & Larsen, S. (2016). The relative importance of social and personal norms in explaining intentions to choose eco‐friendly travel options. International Journal of Tourism Research, 18(2), 159-166.
Eriksson, L., Garvill, J., & Nordlund, A. M. (2006). Acceptability of travel demand management measures: The importance of problem awareness, personal norm, freedom, and fairness. Journal of environmental psychology, 26(1), 15-26.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I.（1977）Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Harland, P., Staats, H., & Wilke, H. A. (1999). Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the Theory of Planned Behavior 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 29(12), 2505-2528.
Holland, R. W., Aarts, H., & Langendam, D. (2006). Breaking and creating habits on the working floor: A field-experiment on the power of implementation intentions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(6), 776-783.
Hopper, J. R., & Nielsen, J. M. (1991). Recycling as altruistic behavior: Normative and behavioral strategies to expand participation in a community recycling program. Environment and behavior, 23(2), 195-220.
Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. The journal of environmental education, 21(3), 8-21.
Ioannou, T., Zampetakis, L. A., & Lasaridi, K. (2013). Psychological determinants of household recycling intention in the context of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 22(7), 2035-2041.
Ittiravivongs, A. (2012). Recycling as habitual behavior: the impact of habit on household waste recycling behavior in Thailand. Asian Social Science, 8(6), 74.
Kuhlemeier, H., Van Den Bergh, H., & Lagerweij, N. (1999). Environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior in Dutch secondary education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 30(2), 4-14
Kaiser, F. G., & Gutscher, H. (2003). The Proposition of a General Version of the Theory of Planned Behavior: Predicting Ecological Behavior 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 33(3), 586-603.
Klöckner, C. A., & Matthies, E. (2009). Structural Modeling of Car Use on the Way to the University in Different Settings: Interplay of Norms, Habits, Situational Restraints, and Perceived Behavioral Control 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(8), 1807-1834.
Klöckner, C. A., & Blöbaum, A. (2010). A comprehensive action determination model: Toward a broader understanding of ecological behaviour using the example of travel mode choice. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 574-586.
Klöckner, C. A., & Oppedal, I. O. (2011). General vs. domain specific recycling behaviour—Applying a multilevel comprehensive action determination model to recycling in Norwegian student homes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(4), 463-471.
Kurisu, K. (2015). Pro-environmental behaviors. Tokyo: Springer Japan.
Lodico, M. G., Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, K. H. (2010). Methods in Educational Research: From Theory to Practice (Vol. 28). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological bulletin, 127(2), 267.
Mainieri, T., Barnett, E. G., Valdero, T. R., Unipan, J. B., & Oskamp, S. (1997). Green buying: The influence of environmental concern on consumer behavior. The Journal of social psychology, 137(2), 189-204.
Minton, A. P., & Rose, R. L. (1997). The effects of environmental concern on environmentally friendly consumer behavior: An exploratory study. Journal of Business research, 40(1), 37-48.
Mahmud, S. N. D., & Osman, K. (2010). The determinants of recycling intention behavior among the Malaysian school students: an application of theory of planned behaviour. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 119-124.
Notani, A. S. (1998). Moderators of perceived behavioral control's predictiveness in the theory of planned behavior: A meta‐analysis. Journal of consumer psychology, 7(3), 247-271.
Nigbur, D., Lyons, E., & Uzzell, D. (2010). Attitudes, norms, identity and environmental behaviour: Using an expanded theory of planned behaviour to predict participation in a kerbside recycling programme. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(2), 259-284.
Ofstad, S. P., Tobolova, M., Nayum, A., & Klöckner, C. A. (2017). Understanding the Mechanisms behind Changing People’s Recycling Behavior at Work by Applying a Comprehensive Action Determination Model. Sustainability, 9(2), 204.
Perugini, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2001). The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal‐directed behaviours: Broadening and deepening the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(1), 79-98.
Poškus, M. S. (2015). Predicting recycling behavior by including moral norms into the theory of planned behavior. Psychology, 52(52), 22-32.
Roscoe, J. T. (1975). Fundamental Research Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Ramsey, P. (1976). Prolonged dying: not medically indicated. Hastings center report, 6(1), 14-17.
Ramayah, T., Lee, J. W. C., & Lim, S. (2012). Sustaining the environment through recycling: An empirical study. Journal of environmental management, 102, 141-147.
Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influence on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol. 10, pp. 221-279.
Scott, D., & Willits, F. K. (1994). Environmental attitudes and behavior: A Pennsylvania survey. Environment and behavior, 26(2), 239-260.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). An integrated model of waste management behavior: A test of household recycling and composting intentions. Environment and Behavior, 27(5), 603-630
Thøgersen, J., & Ölander, F. (2006). The dynamic interaction of personal norms and environment‐friendly buying behavior: a panel study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(7), 1758-1780.
Tonglet, M., Phillips, P. S., & Read, A. D. (2004). Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour to investigate the determinants of recycling behaviour: a case study from Brixworth, UK. Resources, conservation and recycling, 41(3), 191-214.
Verplanken, B., & Aarts, H. (1999). Habit, attitude, and planned behaviour: is habit an empty construct or an interesting case of goal-directed automaticity?. European review of social psychology, 10(1), 101-134.
Verplanken, B., & Orbell, S. (2003). Reflections on Past Behavior: A Self‐Report Index of Habit Strength 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 33(6), 1313-1330.
White, K. M., & Hyde, M. K. (2012). The role of self-perceptions in the prediction of household recycling behavior in Australia. Environment and Behavior, 44(6), 785-799.

二、中文文獻
方偉達（2017）。期刊論文寫作與發表。臺北：五南圖書。
行政院農委會（2017）。聯合國2030永續發展目標（SDGs）簡介。取自 https://www.coa.gov.tw/search_wg.php?search_index_group=1&search_index_class=&q=SDGS
行政院環保署環境保護人員訓練所（2017）。廢棄物回收與再利用概論。新竹:財團法人工業技術研究院。
行政院環保署環境保護人員訓練所（2017）。廢棄物與資源循環相關法規。新竹:財團法人工業技術研究院。
行政院環境保護署（2012）。環境白皮書。取自 https://www.epa.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=31049&CtUnit=851&BaseDSD=7&mp=epa
行政院環境保護署（2013）。垃圾處理政策評估說明書。取自https://www.epa.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=31783&CtUnit=1536&BaseDSD=7&mp=epa
行政院環境保護署（2015）。環境白皮書。取自 https://www.epa.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=31049&CtUnit=851&BaseDSD=7&mp=epa
行政院環境保護署（2016）。環境白皮書。取自 https://www.epa.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=31049&CtUnit=851&BaseDSD=7&mp=epa
吳庭賢（2012）。以計畫行為理論探討民眾對慈善團體回收圖書與報紙類，南華大學出版與文化事業管理研究所碩士論文。
李澤民。（2009）。環境保護法規。臺北：國彰出版社。
林聖杰（2015）。綠島鄉居民資源回收行為意圖之研究。國立臺東大學進修部環境經濟資管碩專碩士論文。
邱柏洋（2016）。台灣民眾廢資訊物品回收行為意圖之研究。國立澎湖科技大學行銷與物流管理系服務業經營管理碩士班碩士論文
邱皓政（2011）。量化研究法(三)：測驗原理與量表發展技術。臺北：雙頁書廊。
邱皓政（2006）。量化研究法(一)研究設計與資料處理:SPSS中文視窗版-修訂版。臺北：雙葉書廊。
財政部臺北國稅局（2013）財政部稅務入口網。取自 https://www.etax.nat.gov.tw/etwmain/front/ETW118W/CON/444/5812833020112818789?tagCode=/
財政部臺北國稅局（2018）。居住者稅率級距表。取自
https://www.ntbt.gov.tw/etwmain/web/ETW118W/CON/2074/5702201758651492080
張添晉，姚凱富（2008）。【科技大觀園】環境新議題：錯置的資源–一般廢棄物的傳奇。取自https://scitechvista.nat.gov.tw/c/Jjtm.htm
張詠晴（2016）。【華爾街日報】:臺灣:廢物物處理天才。天下雜誌。取自 http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5076380。
張雅惠（2001）。國中學生資源回收行為意圖及相關因素之研究~以台北市某國中為例。國立臺灣師範大學衛生教育研究所碩士論文。
黃馨儀（2006）。不同區域與不同的資源回收政策下居民的資源回收行為意圖之研究-以臺北市與高雄市為例，國立高雄師範大學環境教育研究所碩士論文。
楊志偉（2008）。花蓮居民資源回收行為之研究，國立東華大學自然資源管理研究所碩士論文。
葉國樑，趙宏邦，唐貺怡（2000）。台北地區居民資源回收信念與行為意圖研究。衛生教育學報，13, 53-72。
臺北市社會局（2018）。中低收入戶服務。取自
https://dosw.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=5AF1D6B9F9EA9068&sms=C588E74531E0B5E6&s=B7B86C71B221C44D
臺北市政府環境保護局（1986）。臺北市政府環境保護局年報。取自 https://www.dep.gov.taipei/cp.aspx?n=A2A940FBA3F0440A
臺北市政府環境保護局（1996）。臺北市政府環境保護局年報。取自 https://www.dep.gov.taipei/cp.aspx?n=A2A940FBA3F0440A
臺北市政府環境保護局。（2000）。臺北市政府環境保護局年報。取自 https://www.dep.gov.taipei/cp.aspx?n=A2A940FBA3F0440A
臺北市政府環境保護局。（2015）。臺北市政府環境保護局年報。取自 https://www.dep.gov.taipei/cp.aspx?n=A2A940FBA3F0440A
臺北市政府環境保護局。（2016）。臺北市政府環境保護局年報。取自 https://www.dep.gov.taipei/cp.aspx?n=A2A940FBA3F0440A
臺北市政府環境保護局。（2017）。臺北市政府環境保護局年報。取自 https://www.dep.gov.taipei/cp.aspx?n=A2A940FBA3F0440A