研究生: |
廖淑戎 Shu-Jung Liao |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
時間延宕教學策略對教導中度智能障礙學生連鎖工作之研究 |
指導教授: | 杜正治 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
特殊教育學系 Department of Special Education |
論文出版年: | 2003 |
畢業學年度: | 92 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 150 |
中文關鍵詞: | 時間延宕 、連鎖工作 |
英文關鍵詞: | time delay, chained tasks |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:782 下載:70 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究比較時間延宕教學策略在教導連鎖工作時的學習成果及學習效率,採用單一受試研究法的交替處理設計,由國立林口啟智學校國中部三位中度智能障礙學生接受漸進時間延宕(PTD)和固定時間延宕(CTD)二種教學策略,學習二份餐前準備的連鎖工作,藉由其學習成果、學習效率、保留情形,比較時間延宕教學策略在教導中度智能障礙學生連鎖工作時的成效,其中並分析受試在反應時所出現的錯誤型態。
本研究結果得到如下結論:
(一)二種時間延宕教學策略都能使受試產生學習效果,達到正向且滿意的結果。
(二)CTD比PTD產生較明顯的上升,且較早達到標準。
(三)二種時間延宕教學策略都能使受試維持表現達一週。
(四)PTD出現的型態錯誤、順序錯誤及期限錯誤比CTD多。
(五)錯誤型態以順序錯誤出現次數最多。
(六)二種時間延宕教學策略在給予提示前後的錯誤反應比例相近。
(七)二種時間延宕教學策略在給予提示前的錯誤反應比給予提示後多,且都出現低錯誤率的現象。
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness (numbers of correct anticipations) and efficiency (sessions, type of errors, minutes of instructional time, and nonwait versus wait errors to criterion) of two time-delay procedures in teaching chained tasks. The procedures were evaluated using the alternating treatment design. Three secondary-age students with moderate mental retardation in National Lin-Kou Special Education School for Mentally Retarded were taught two chained tasks before lunch. A different chained task was taught during each of two daily sessions, one task with constant time delay (CTD) and the other with progressive time delay (PTD). Maintenance of chained tasks were assessed. Also, the detailed error analysis were assessed.
The results indicated that (a) both strategies were effective, and produced criterion-level responding in the instructional setting, (b) CTD procedure was more efficient than PTD. (c) both strategies produced criterion-level responding that maintained in 1-week follow-up probes. (d) PTD procedure produced more than CTD in terms of topographical, sequence, and duration errors. (e) error data indicated that sequence errors occur most frequently. (f) in terms of nonwait versus wait errors to criterion, both strategies had no significant difference. (g) the percent of nonwait errors was higher than the percent of wait errors.
參考書目
王大延(民84):延宕時間策略對增進無自發語言之自閉症學生自發語言之成效研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告NSC84-2421-H133-001(未出版)。
王大延、曹純瓊(民87):示範、時間延宕及提示對增進自閉症學童自發語言之成效研究。台北市立師範學院學報,29期,頁291-315。
王明泉(民88):固定時間延緩協助策略對國小中度智能障礙學生摺紙技能之研究。載於國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系編印:第四屆特殊教育課程與教學學術研討會,頁19-44。
毛連塭(民88):特殊兒童教學法。台北市:心理出版社。
杜正治(民82):行為學派的學習理論。載於李詠吟主編:學習輔導,第一章(頁3-50)。台北市:心理出版社。
杜正治譯(民83):單一受試研究法。台北市:心理出版社。
何東墀(民80):時間延緩在工作分析教學之應用。特教園丁,6卷4期,頁1-5。
李詠吟(民87):認知教學理論與策略。台北市:心理出版社。
李淑貞譯(民86):中、重度障礙者有效教學法。台北市:心理出版社。
林千惠(民84):工作分析與職業技能訓練。載於行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局編印:殘障者職業訓練與就業輔導之理論與實務,頁340-386。台北市:行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局。
周台傑、蘇婉容(民82):兩種刺激褪減方式對國小中度智能不足學生學習實用性詞彙之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育中心編印。
林坤燦(民84):智能障礙者職業教育與訓練。台北市:五南圖書公司。
林清山(民87):教學心理學的心趨向。載於林清山主編:有效學習的方法,第一章(頁1-12)。台北市:教育部。
林惠芬(民82):有效教學策略介紹。載於國立彰化師範大學特殊教育中心編印:國民中學啟智教師教學手冊,頁101-114。彰化市:國立彰化師範大學特殊教育中心。
林寶山(民81):特殊教育導論。台北市:五南圖書出版公司。
莊素貞(民87):盲聾兒童溝通發展訓練之研究。台中師院學報,12期,頁621-638。
張景媛(民87):有效教學方法。載於林清山主編:有效學習的方法,第三章(頁21-34)。台北市:教育部。
陳明聰、李天佑、王華沛、楊國屏(民89):應用電腦輔具結合刺激褪減策略教導國小中重度智能障礙學生識字之研究。載於中華民國特殊教育學會編印: e世代特殊教育,頁251-262。
陳榮華(民81):智能不足研究。台北市:師大書苑。
單文經(民84):有效教學的知識基礎。載於李詠吟、單文經著:教學原理,第十五章(頁335-372)。台北市:遠流出版社。
曾明玲(民82):教學活動設計原則。載於國立彰化師範大學特殊教育中心編印:國民中學啟智教師教學手冊,頁47-62。彰化市:國立彰化師範大學特殊教育中心。
廖淑戎(民91):時間延宕教學策略的介紹與使用。特殊教育季刊,84期,頁34-40。
簡明建、邱金滿(民89):特殊教育的課程與教學。載於林寶貴主編:特殊教育理論與實務,第十二章(頁403-444)。台北市:心理出版社。
Ault, M. J., Gast, D. L., & Wolery, M. (1988). Comparison of progressive and constant time-delay procedures in teaching community-sign word reading. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 93, 44-56.
Ault, M. J., Gast, D. L., Wolery, M., & Doyle, P. M. (1992). Data collection and graphing method for teaching chained tasks with the constant time delay procedure. Teaching Exceptional Children, 24, 28-33.
Ault, M. J., Wolery, M., Doyle, P. M., & Gast, D. L. (1989). Review of comparative studies in the instruction of students with moderate and severe handicaps. Exceptional Children, 55, 346-356.
Ault, M. J., Wolery, M., Gast, D. L., Doyle, P. M., & Eizenstat, V. (1988). Comparison of response prompting procedures in teaching numeral identification to autistic subjects. Journal of Autism and Development Disorders, 18, 627-636.
Ault, M. J., Wolery, M., Gast, D. L., Doyle, P. M., & Martin, C. P. (1990).Comparison of predictable and unpredictable trial sequences during small-group instruction. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 12-29.
Bennett, D. L., Gast, D. L., Wolery, M., & Schuster, J. (1986). Time delay and system of least prompts: A comparison in teaching manual sign production. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 21, 117-129.
Branham, R. S., Collins, B. C., Schuster, J. W., & Kleinert, H. (1999). Teaching community skills to students with moderate disabilities: Comparing combined techniques of classroom simulation, videotape modeling, and community-based instruction. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 170-181.
Browder, D. M., & Minarovic, T. J. (2000). Utilizing sight words in self-instruction training for employees with moderate mental retardation in competitive jobs. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 78-89.
Chandler, W., Schuster, J. W., & Stevens, K. B. (1993). Teaching employment skills to adolescents with mild and moderate disabilities using a constant time delay procedure. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 28, 155-168.
Charlop, M. H., Schreibman, L., & Thibodeau, M. G. (1985). Increasing spontaneous verbal responding in autistic children using a time delay procedure. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 155-166.
Charlop, M. H., & Trasowech, J. E. (1991). Increasing autistic children’s daily spontaneous speech. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 747-761.
Charlop, M. H., & Walch, M. E. (1986). Increasing autistic children’s spontaneous verbalizations of affection: An assessment of time delay and peer modeling procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 307-314.
Chen, S., Zhang, J., Lange, E., Miko, P., & Joseph, D. (2001). Progressive time delay procedure for teaching motor skills to adults with severe mental retardation. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 18, 35-48.
Chiara, L., Schuster, J. W., Bell, J. K., & Wolery, M. (1995). Small-group massed-trial and individually-distributed-trial instruction with preschoolers. Journal of Early Intervention, 19, 203-217.
Collins, B. C., Branson, T. A., & Hall, M. (1995). Teaching generalized reading of cooking product labels to adolescents with mental disabilities through the use of key words taught by peer tutors. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30, 65-75.
Collins, B. C., Gast, D. L., Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., & Leatherby, J. G. (1991). Using constant time delay to teach self-feeding to young students with severe/profound handicaps: Evidence of limited effectiveness. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 3, 157-179.
Collins,B. C., & Griffen, A. K. (1996). Teaching students with moderate disabilities to make safe responses to product warning labels. Education and Treatment of Children, 19, 30-45.
Daugherty, S., Grisham-Brown, J., & Hemmeter, M. L. (2001). The effects of embedded skill instruction on the acquisition of target and nontarget skills in preschools with developmental delays. Topic in Early Childhood Special Education, 21, 213-221.
Doyle, P. M., & Gast, D. L. (1990). Use of constant time delay in small group instruction: A study of observational and incidental learning. Journal of Special Education, 23, 369-385.
Doyle, P. M., Schuster, J. W., & Meyer, S. (1996). Embedding extra stimuli in the task direction: Effects on learning of students with moderate mental retardation. Journal of Special Education, 29, 381-399.
Doyle, P. M., Wolery, M., Gast, D. L., & Ault, M. J. (1990). Comparison of constant time delay and the system of least prompts in teaching preschoolers with developmental delays. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 11, 1-22.
Doyle, P. M., Wolery, M., Gast, D. L., Ault, M. J., & Wiley, K. (1990). Comparison of constant time delay and the system of least prompts in teaching preschoolers with developmental delays. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 11, 1-22.
Duker, P. C., van Deursen, W., de Wit, M., Palmen, A. (1997). Establishing a receptive repertoire of communicative gestures with individuals who are profoundly mentally retarded. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 32, 357-361.
Edwards, B. J., Blackhurst, A. E., & Koorland, M. A. (1995). Computer- assisted constant time delay prompting to teach abbreviation spelling to adolescents with mild learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12, 301-311.
Farmer, J. A., Gast, D. L., Wolery, M., & Winterling, V. (1991). Small group instruction for students with severe handicaps: A study of observational learning. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 26, 190-201.
Fiscus, R. S., Schuster, J. W., Morse, T. E., & Collins, B. C. (2002). Teaching elementary students with cognitive disabilities food preparation skills while embedding instructive feedback in the prompt and consequent event. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 55-69.
Frederick-Dugan, A., Test, D. T., & Varn, L. (1991). Acquisition and generalization of purchasing skills using a calculator by students who are mentally retarded. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 26, 381-387.
Gast, D. L., Ault, M. J., Wolery, M., Doyle, P. M., & Belanger, S. (1988). Comparison of constant time delay and the system of least prompts in teaching sight word reading to students with moderate retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 23, 117-128.
Gast, D. L., & Doyle, P. M. (1991). Acquisition of incidental information during small group instruction. Education and Treatment of Children, 14, 1-18.
Gast, D. L., Doyle, P. M., Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Farmer, J. A. (1991). Assessing the acquisition of incidental information by secondary-age students with mental retardation: Comparison of response prompting strategies. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 96, 63-80.
Gast, D. L., & Winterling, V. (1992). Teaching first-aid skills to students with moderate handicaps in small group instruction. Education and Treatment of Children, 15, 101-124.
Gee, K., Graham, N., Goetz, L., Oshima, G., & Yoshioka, K. (1991). Teaching students to request the continuation of routine activities by using time delay and decreasing physical assistance in the context of chain interruption. The Association for Person with Severe Handicaps, 16, 154-167.
Gibson, A. N., & Schuster, J. W. (1992). The use of simultaneous prompting for teaching expressive word recognition to preschool children. Topic in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 247-257.
Godby, S., Gast, D. L., & Wolery, M. (1987). A comparison of time delay and system of least prompts in teaching object identification. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 8, 283-306.
Griffen, A. K., Wolery, M., & Schuster, J. W. (1992). Triadic instruction of chained food preparation responses: Acquisition and observational learning. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 193-204.
Handen, B. L., & Zane, T. (1987). Delayed prompting: A review of procedural variations and results. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 8, 307-330.
Hitchcock, C. H., & Noonan, M. J. (2000). Computer-assisted instruction of early academic skills. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 145-158.
Hughes, M. W., Schuster, J. W., & Nelson, C. M. (1993). The acquisition of independent dressing skills by students with multiple disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 5, 233-295.
Ingenmey, R., Van Houten, R. (1991). Using time delay to prompt spontaneous speech in an autistic child. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 591-596.
Kennedy, C. H. (1992). Concurrent operants: A model for stimulus control transfer using delayed prompting. Psychological Record, 42, 525-540.
Keel, M. C., Bott, D., & Edward, S. A. (2001). Acquisition of content area vocabulary for students with learning disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 24, 46-71.
Keel, M. C., & Gast, D. (1995). Small-group instruction for students with learning disabilities: Observational and incidental learning. Exceptional Children, 58, 357-368.
Kinney, P. G., Stevens, K. B., & Schuster, J. W. (1988). The effects of CAI and time delay: A systematic program for teaching spelling. Journal of Special Education Technology, 8,61-72.
Koscinski, S. T., & Gast, D. L. (1993a). Computer-assisted instruction with constant time delay to teach multiplication facts to students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 8, 157-168.
Koscinski, S. T., & Gast, D. L. (1993b). Use of constant time delay in teaching multiplication facts to students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 533-544.
Kratzer, D. A., & Spooner, F. (1993). Extending the application of constant time delay: Teaching a requesting skill to students with severe multiple disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 16, 235-253.
Lalli, J. S., & Browder, D. M. (1993). Comparison of sight word training procedures with validation of the most practical procedure in teaching reading for daily living. Research in Develomental Disabilities, 14, 107-127.
Matson, J. L., Sevin, J. A., Box, M. L., & Sevin, B. M. (1993). An evaluation of two methods for increasing self-initiated verbalizations in autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 389-398.
Matson, J. L., Sevin, J. A., Fridley, D., & Love, S. R. (1990). Increasing spontaneous language in three autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 227-233.
McCurdy, B. L., & Cundari, L. (1990). Enhancing instruction efficiency: An examination of time delay and the opportunity to observe instructions. Education and Treatment of Children, 13, 226-238.
McDonnell, J., & Ferguson, B. (1989). A comparison of time delay and decreasing prompt hierarchy strategies in teaching banking skills to students with moderate handicaps. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 85-91.
Miller, U. C., & Test, U. W. (1989). A comparison of constant time delay and most-to-least prompting in teaching laundry skills to students with moderate retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 24, 363-370.
Miranda-Linne, F., & Melin, L. (1992). Acquisition, generalization, and spontaneous use of color adjectives: A comparison of incidental teaching and traditional discrete-trial procedures for children with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 13, 191-210.
Mobayed,K. L., Collins, B. C., Strangis, D. E., Schuster, J. W., & Hemmeter, M. L. (2000). Teaching parents to employ mand-model procedures to teach their children requesting. Journal of Early Intervention, 23, 165-179.
Morse, T. E., & Schuster, J. W. (2000). Teaching elementary students with moderate intellectual disabilities how to shop for groceries. Exceptional Children, 66, 273-288.
Morton, R. C., & Flynt, S. W. (1997). A comparison of constant time delay and prompt fading to teach multiplication facts to students with learning disabilities. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 24, 3-13.
Rusch, F. R., Martin, J. E., & White, D. M. (1985). Competitive employment: Teaching mentally retarded employees to maintain their work behavior. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 20, 182-189.
Sandknop, P. A., Schuster, J. W., Wolery, M., & Cross, D. P. (1992). The use of an adaptive device to teach students with moderate mental retardation to select lower priced grocery items. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 27, 219-229.
Schoen, S. F., & Sivil, E. O. (1989). A comparison of procedures in teaching self-help skills: Increasing assistance, time delay, and observational learning. Journal of Autism and developmental disorders, 19, 57-72.
Schoen, S. F., & Ogden, S. (1995). Impact of time delay, observational learning, and attentional cuing upon word recognition during integrated small-group instruction. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 25, 503-519.
Schuster, J. W., & Griffen, A. K. (1991). Using constant time delay to teach recipe following skill. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 26, 411-419.
Schuster, J. W., Morse, T. E., Ault, M. J., Doyle, P. M., Crawford, M. R., & Wolery, M. (1998). Constant time delay with chained tasks: A review of the literature. Education and Treatment of Children, 21, 74-106.
Schuster, J. W., Stevens, K. B., Doak, P. K. (1990). Using constant time delay to teach word definitions. Journal of Special Education, 24, 306-318.
Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1993). Teaching students with mild mental retardation. In R. A. Gable & S. F. Warren(Eds.), Strategies for teaching students with mild to severe mental retardation(pp.117-128). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Singleton, D. K., Schuster, J. W., Morse, T. E., Collins, B. C. (1999). A comparison of antecedent prompt and test and simultaneous prompting procedures in teaching grocery words to adolescents with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 182-199.
Smeets, P. M., Lancioni, G. E., Striefel, S., & Curfs, P. M. G. (1988). Establishing a difficult discrimination through time delay: Some critical dimensions of prompts. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 45, 280-302.
Stevens, K. B., Blackhurst, A. E., & Slaton, D. B. (1991). Teaching memorized spelling with a microcomputer: Time delay and computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 153-160.
Stevens, K. B., & Schuster, J. W. (1987). Effects of a constant time delay procedure on the written spelling performance of a learning disabled student. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 9-16.
Taylor, B. A., & Harris, S. L. (1995). Teaching children with autism to seek information: Acquisition of novel information and generalization of responding. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 3-14.
Terrace, H. S. (1963a). Discrimination learning with and without errors. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 1-27.
Terrace, H. S. (1963b). Errorless transfer of a discrimination across two continua. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 223-232.
Touchette, P. E. (1968). The effects of graduated stimulus change on the acquisition of a simple discrimination in severely retarded boys. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 39-48.
Touchette, P. E. (1971). Transfer of stimulus control: Measuring the moment of transfer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15, 347-354.
Touchette, P. E., & Howard, J. S. (1984). Errorless learning: Reinforcement contingencies and stimulus control transfer in delayed prompting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 175-188.
Turnell, R., & Carter, M. (1994). Establishing a repertoire of requesting for a student with severe and multiple disabilities using tangible symbols and naturalistic time delay. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 19, 193-208.
Wall, M. E., & Gast, D. L. (1997a). Acquisition of incidental information during instruction for a response-chain skill. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 20, 31-50.
Wall, M. E., & Gast, D. L. (1997b). Caregivers’ use of constant time delay to teach leisure skills to adolescents or young adults with moderate or severe intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 32, 340-356.
Walls, R. T., Dowler, D. L., Haught, P. A., & Zawlocki, R. J. (1984). Progressive delay and unlimited delay of prompts in forward chaining and whole task training strategies. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 19, 276-284.
Werts, M. G., & Wolery, M. (1996). Effects of transitions-based teaching with instructive feedback on skill acquisition by children with and without disabilities. Journal of Educational Research, 90, 75-86.
Williams, D. M., & Collins, B. C. (1994). Teaching multiplication facts to students with learning disabilities: Teacher-selected versus students-selected material prompts within the delayed procedure. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 589-597.
Winterling, V. (1990). The effects of constant time delay, practice in writing or spelling, and reinforcement on sight word recognition in a small group. The Journal of Special Education, 24, 101-116.
Winterling, V., Gast, D. L., Wolery, M., & Farmer, J. A. (1992). Teaching safty skills to high school students with moderate disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 217-227.
Wolery, M., Anthony, L., Caldwell, N. K., Snyder, E. D., & Morgante, J. D. (2002). Embedding and distributing constant time delay in circle time and transitions. Topic in Early Childhood Special Education, 22, 14-25.
Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., Doyle, P. M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate to severe disabilities: Using of response prompting procedures. White Plains, NY: Longman.
Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., Doyle, P. M., & Gast, D. L. (1986). Comparison of instructional strategies: A literature review. (ERIC Document for Research Service No.ED345418)
Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., Gast, D. L., Doyle, P. M., & Griffen, A. K. (1990). Comparison of constant time delay and the system of least prompts in teaching chained tasks. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 25, 243-257.
Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., Gast, D. L., Doyle, P. M., & Griffen, A. K. (1991). Teaching children tasks in dyads: Acquisition of target and observational behaviors. The Journal of Special Education, 25, 198-220.
Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., Gast, D. L., Doyle, P. M., & Mills, B. M. (1991). Use of choral and individual attentional responses with constant time delay when teaching sight word reading. Remedial and Special Education, 11, 47-58.
Wolery, M., Bailey, D. B. JR., & Sugai, G. M. (1988). Effective teaching: Principles and procedures of applied behavior analysis with exceptional students. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, Inc.
Wolery, M., Cybriwsky, C. A., Gast, D. L., & Boyle-Gast, K. (1991). Use of constant time delay and attentional response with adolescents. Exceptional Children, 57, 462-474.
Wolery, M., Doyle, P. M., Gast, D. L. Ault, M. J., & Simpson, S. L. (1993). Comparison of progressive time delay and transition-based teaching with preschoolers who have developmental delays. Journal of Early Intervention, 17, 160-176.
Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., Cybriwsky, C., Doyle, P. M., Schuster, J. W., Ault, M. J., & Gast, D. L. (1992). Constant time delay discrete responses: A review of effectiveness and demographic, procedural, and methodological parameters. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 13, 239-266.
Zhang, J., Gast, D., Horvat, M., & Dattillo, J. (1995). The effectiveness of a constant time delay procedure on teaching lifetime sport skills to adolescents with severe to profound intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30, 51-64.
Zhang, J., Gast, D., Horvat, M., & Dattillo, J. (2000). Effect of a constant time delay procedure on motor skill completion durations. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 317-325.