簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 唐韶玲
論文名稱: 實習教師在不同學校社群文化與不同實習輔導理念下之專業成長研究
The professional growth of interns under different school community culture and mentoring ideas
指導教授: 黃芳裕
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 化學系
Department of Chemistry
論文出版年: 2002
畢業學年度: 90
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 243
中文關鍵詞: 師資培育願景學校社群文化實習輔導理念教師專業成長
英文關鍵詞: he vision of teacher preparation, school community culture, mentoring ideas, the professional growth of teacher
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:174下載:32
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 我國自民國八十三年頒佈「師資培育法」後,揭示了往後師資來源管道多元化的政策,同時,依據民國八十四年「高級中學以下學校及幼稚園教師資格檢定及教育實習辦法」,實習教師必須在教育實習機構進行為期一年的教育實習,據此,確立了往後新制實習制度的執行。新制教育實習的特色之一是採取學校導向的師徒制,實習教師在實習期間除了要與實習輔導教師發展互動關係之外,也要對實習學校的社群文化有一充分掌握。因此,本研究旨在探討新制實習制度下,實習學校社群文化與實習輔導教師的實習輔導理念對實習教師專業成長表現的影響。研究採質性個案研究法,以文獻分析、學校社群文化、師資培育願景、實習輔導理念以及教師專業成長等理論為基礎,再配合教室觀察、現場記錄、訪談以及教師反省日誌等所蒐集到的資料,來分析實習輔導教師的實習輔導理念與實習教師的專業成長表現。研究將實習輔導教師分成結構、支持與專業三個面向,將實習教師專業成長分成專業知識、教學特性、人際關係與個人價值觀四個面向,並輔以雙方特質及互動情形,以及師資培育願景與實習學校社群文化等影響因子,來綜合探討實習教師的專業成長表現。研究結果發現:一、在實習場所方面:1.實習學校不同的社群文化將影響到實習教師的對實習場所的向心力。2.實習學校的實習規劃越周詳,實習教師的專業成長也更趨全面向。二、在實習輔導教師方面:1.實習輔導教師有完整的實習輔導理念時,實習教師將會受其影響,而獲得較佳的專業成長。2.實習輔導教師與實習教師互動良好者,實習過程將更加順利,實習成果也更好。3.實習場所的選擇是否適當,對實習教師成長將有顯著性的影響。三、在實習教師方面:1.實習教師對各領域的涉獵程度越廣,在教學上的表現也越豐富。2.實習教師的個人價值觀將影響到實習教師的專業成長表現。3.實習教師的個人特質將影響到實習教師的專業成長表現。4.實習教師對實習場所的融入程度越高,實習教師的專業成長表現也越圓滿。5.實習教師越能理解教師角色的複雜度時,越能獲得較佳的專業成長。6.實習教師若能掌握住未來教育政策走向,對實習的熱忱度也會相對提高。

    Since the announcement of the Ministry of Education in 1984, the teacher preparation system has changed. New policy reveals the multi-source of teacher preparation. Its characteristic is the conduction of school-based apprenticeship model. Namely, from then on, the interns must practice in teacher preparation institution with one year. The vision of new intern system is, besides well interact with the mentors, the interns should comprehend the community culture of school. So, the aim of this study is to explore that under new intern system, the teacher professional growth situation is how affected by the community school culture and the mentoring ideas of the mentors. On the base of qualitative research, the framework of this study was constructed through the literature analysis on the vision of teacher preparation, mentoring ideas, teacher professional growth and school community culture. Data collection as follows: observation of classroom, filed notes, interviews and reflective journals. Researcher analyzed the mentors through three dimensions: (1) structural, (2) supportive and (3) professional; the interns through four dimensions: (1) professional knowledge, (2) teaching properties, (3) personal relationship and (4) personal worldview of interns. Researcher analyzed these dimensions through (1) personal character, (2) interaction of mentors and interns, (3) the vision of teacher preparation and (4) the community culture of intern school. The study conclusions are expressed through three aspects: First, in the aspect of intern school, (1) The school community culture will affect the centripetal force of the interns to the intern school. (2) When the teachers’ pedagogical practice of intern school properly-managed, the professional growth of interns will be better. Second, in the aspect of mentors, (1) Mentors with complete mentoring ideas will affect the growth of interns, and interns will get better professional growth. (2) When mentors and interns interacted well, the mentoring process will operate successfully. (3) The selection of intern school is an important factor in interns’ professional growth. Third, in the aspect of interns, (1) When interns are well-informed, their teaching will perform thoroughly. (2) The professional growth varies from the personal worldview of interns. (3) The professional growth varies from the personal character of interns. (4) When interns are in harmony with environment, interns will get better professional growth. (5) The professional growth of the interns will perform successfully when the interns are perceptual to the complexity of teacher. (6) If the interns can comprehend the future educational policy, the degree of devotion will raise.

    目 次 博碩士論文上網授權書…………………………………………….iii 學位考試委員審定書………………………………………………...v 誌謝……………………………………………………………………vii 中文摘要…………………………………………………………...viii 英文摘要………………………………………………………….....x 目次……………………………………………………………………xii 表次………………………………………………………………...xvi 圖次…………………………………………………………………..xvii 1. 緒論…………………………………………………………………..1 1.1. 研究動機與研究目的…………………………………………...1 1.2. 研究範圍與研究限制…………………………………………...3 1.2.1. 研究範圍………………………………………………..……3 1.2.2. 研究限制………………………………………………...……3 1.3. 重要名詞釋義…………………………………………………..4 1.4. 實習輔導的重要性………………………………………….…10 1.4.1. 實習輔導的本質……………………………………….....10 1.4.2. 實習輔導教師的起源與意義………………………….....10 1.5. 實習學校的影響…………………………………………………12 1.5.1. 學習是文化的……………………………………...…...12 1.5.2. 幫助實習教師培養溝通能力……………………...…...12 2. 文獻分析與探討………………………………………………...14 2.1. 師資培育多元化的要義……………………………………….14 2.1.1. 師資培育管道多元化……………………………………....14 2.1.2. 師資培育課程多元化……………………………………....15 2.1.3 多元文化教育與師資培育………………………………..….17 2.2. 教師生涯發展與規劃………………………………………….21 2.2.1. 生涯的意義………………………………………………....21 2.2.2. 教師生涯發展……………………………………………....22 2.2.3. 教師生涯發展與規劃……………………………………....24 2.3. 教師專業社會化過程………………………………………….28 2.3.1. 教師專業……………………………………………...…..28 2.3.2. 教師專業社會化理論……………………………….……...32 2.3.3. 教師省察能力的發展與類型……………………...…...36 2.4. 新制師資培育制度下的實習輔導過程……………………….42 2.4.1. 實習輔導教師角色與實習輔導過程模式之探討…….…...42 2.4.2. 實習輔導過程的模式探討…………………………………..47 2.5. 學校社群文化對實習輔導的影響………………………………50 2.5.1 學校文化…………………………………………………..….50 2.5.2. 學校社群文化……………………………………………....51 3. 理論架構與研究設計………………………………………………53 3.1. 理論架構……………………………………………………….53 3.1.1 師資培育願景……………………………………………..….53 3.1.2. 學校社群文化……………………………………………....53 3.1.3 教師個體成長……………………………………………..….54 3.2. 研究設計與資料蒐集……………………………………………55 3.2.1. 研究設計…………………………………………………....55 3.2.2. 資料蒐集…………………………………………………....56 3.2.3. 研究信度與效度…………………………………….……...58 3.3. 資料分析方式……………………………………………………59 3.3.1. 實習輔導教師………………………………………….…...60 3.3.2. 實習教師……………………………………………..…...62 3.4. 研究對象……………………………………………………….65 3.4.1. 研究對象的選擇……………………………………….…...65 3.4.2. 研究對象背景整理…………………………………..…...66 3.4.3. 實習學校的特色與實習規劃………………………...…...67 4. 資料分析……………………………………………………………70 4.1. 實習輔導教師的分析………………………………………….71 4.1.1. A實習輔導教師……………………………………………...71 4.1.2. B實習輔導團體……………………………………………...71 4.1.3. C實習輔導教師……………………………………………...81 4.1.4. D實習輔導教師……………………………………………...89 4.1.5. E實習輔導團體………………………………………………99 4.2. 實習教師的分析…………………………………………………...111 4.2.1. a實習教師…………………………………………………..111 4.2.2. b實習教師…………………………………………………..124 4.2.3. c實習教師…………………………………………………..140 4.2.4. d實習教師…………………………………………………..152 4.2.5. e實習教師…………………………………………………..172 5. 研究結果與討論…………………………………………………………..192 5.1. 不同學校社群文化對實習教師的專業成長影響討論……...194 5.1.1. a實習教師與b實習教師之比較討論………………...……194 5.1.2. c實習教師與d實習教師之比較討論……………………...197 5.2. 實習輔導教師與實習教師的互動探討 5.2.1. C實習輔導教師與D實習輔導教師之比較討論……….…201 5.2.2. D實習輔導教師與E實習輔導團體之比較討論………….203 5.3. 五位實習教師的實習綜合討論……………………………..206 6. 結論與建議…..…………………………………………………209 6.1. 結論…..…………………………………………………….209 6.2. 建議…..…………………………………………………….213 參考文獻…..……………………………………………………….215 附錄A:部分訪談轉錄資料…..………………………………….223 1. 實習輔導教師部分…..……………………………………223 2. 實習教師部分…..…………………………………………226 附錄B:部分現場記錄資料…..…………………………………..231 1. 實習輔導教師部分…..……………………………………231 2. 實習教師部分…..…………………………………………232 附錄C:部分教師反省日誌…..………………………………….234 附錄D:以Perry基模分析研究資料的範例…..……………………235 1. 實習輔導教師部分…..…………………………………………235 2. 實習教師部分…..………………………………………………239 附錄E:相關著作…..…………………………………………………243 中華民國第十七屆科學教育研討會…..……………………….243 表 次 表2-1:師資培育機構與學程別矩陣(丁志權,1998).………….16 表2-2:國內學者論教師專業指標(何福田、羅瑞玉,1992)……29 表2-3:Williams實習輔導教師任務(Williams,1993)…………43 表2-4:實習輔導教師的角色面向與角色要素 (Yeomans & Sampson,1994)……………………………………47 表3-1:實習輔導教師依據Perry基膜所呈現的三個面向…………61 表3-2:實習教師依據Perry基膜所呈現的四個面向………………63 表3-3:研究對象背景整理…………………………………………67 圖 次 圖2-1:教師生涯發展動態圖(Fessler,1992)……………………25 圖2-2:英國師資培育制度中,教師在學習去教過程中的認知模式 (Furlong & Maynard,1995)……………………………………37 圖3-1:研究使用的理論架構模型……………………………………54 圖4-1:B實習輔導團體所呈現的實習輔導理念圖………………….81 圖4-2:C實習輔導教師所呈現的實習輔導理念圖………………….89 圖4-3:D實習輔導教師所呈現的實習輔導理念圖………………….99 圖4-4:E實習輔導團體所呈現的實習輔導理念圖…………………110 圖4-5:a實習教師專業成長雷達圖…………………………………124 圖4-5:b實習教師專業成長雷達圖…………………………………139 圖4-5:c實習教師專業成長雷達圖…………………………………152 圖4-5:d實習教師專業成長雷達圖…………………………………172 圖4-5:e實習教師專業成長雷達圖…………………………………191 圖5-1:四位實習輔導教師實習輔導理念圖總呈現……………..192 圖5-2:五位實習教師專業成長分析雷達圖總呈現…………….193

    中文部分:
    丁志權(1998) <我國實習教師輔導制度的問題與改革>,頁49-60。《特約實習學校的實習輔導理論與實務學術研討會論文集》。台灣:出版者不詳。
    中國教育學會(1982)。《教育組織與專業精神》。台北:華欣。
    王秋絨(1991)。《教師專業社會化理論在教育實習上的蘊義》。台北:師大書苑。
    尹淑萍(2000) 《師資培育制度下科學實習教師實習個案研究》。台北:台灣師範大學化學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    江文雄(1998) <彩繪亮麗的人生:談教師的生涯規劃>。《技術及職業教育》,44,頁17-23。
    何福田、羅瑞玉(1992)。<教育改革與教師專業化>。中華民國師範教育學會主編。《教育專業》,頁1-30。台北:師大書苑。
    林生傳、謝琇玲(1997) 《多元化師資培育制度下的教學研究》。高雄:高雄師大教育學系。
    林美玲 (2001) <中小學課程發展、教學革新與師培改革(上)>。《師說》,153,頁31-41,台北:中華民國全國教育會。
    林清江(1996) 《教育理念與教育發展》。台北:五南。
    林懿萱、黃芳裕 (2000) 新制實習制度下的理化實習教師之專業成長研究。《中華民國第十六屆科學教育研討會》,頁679-686。台北:教育部。
    林懿萱(2001) 《新制實習制度下國中理化實習教師的專業成長:質性個案研究》。台北:台灣師範大學化學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    侯建威(1995) <教師生涯發展:成功的喜悅>。《師說》,82,頁22-27。
    徐宗國 譯(2000)。《質性研究概論》,台北:巨流。Strauss, A. & Corbin, J., (1990). Basic of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London and New Delhi: Sage Publications.
    高強華(1992)。<教師社會化研究及其在師資培育上的意義>。中華民國師範教育學會主編。《教育專業》,頁53-88。台北:師大書苑。
    張德銳 (1996) <美國良師制度對我國實習輔導制度之啟示>。《初等教育學刊》,5,頁41-64。台北:台北市立師範學院初等教育系所。
    張德銳(1998) 《師資培育與教育革新研究》。台北:五南。
    教育部中等教育司 (1999) 《中等學校教育實習實習指導教授手冊》。台北:教育部。
    陳枝烈(1999) 《多元文化教育》,高雄:復文。
    陳奎熹(1999) 《現代教育社會學》。台北:師大書苑。
    陳美玉(1999) 《教師專業與發展》。台北:師大書苑。
    曾國鴻(1995) <教師生涯進程的抉擇 >。《教育實習輔導》,1(3),頁5-8。
    黃芳裕(1998) 《學生使用科學知識省察表徵分析》。台北:國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
    黃俊彬(2001) <對於輔導實習教師之理念與策略的幾點省思>。《國教輔導》,40(4),54-58。
    葉郁菁(2000) <多元化社會之衝擊對教育實習的省思>,《教育實習輔導季刊》,6(2),頁62-68。彰化:彰師大學生實習輔導處。
    廖金閱(2000) 《以論述分析討論新舊制理化實習個案教師的成長》。台北:台灣師範大學化學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    廖國智(2001) 《以心智模型理論分析科學實習教師的專業表徵》。台北:台灣師範大學化學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    劉之穎(1998) 《教師生涯起步走》,台北:幼獅。
    賴清標(1997) 《教育實習》,台北:五南。
    顏慶祥、湯維玲、王嬿惠(1998) <臺灣地區新制實習輔導教師的現況與問題>,頁61-93。《特約實習學校的實習輔導理論與實務學術研討會論文集》。台灣:出版者不詳。

    英文部分:
    Banks, J. A. & Banks, C. A. M. (2001) Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Bowers, R. S. (1994) A typology of cooperating Teacher-student teacher relationships: Perceptions of student teachers. In O’hair, J. & Odell, S. J. (Ed.), Partnership in Education: Teacher Education Yearbook II. (p.102-119). Fort Worth : Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
    Boyle-Baise, M. (1999) Meaning of culture in multicultural education: a response to anthropological critiques. Journal of Educational Thought, 33(1), 9-29.
    Brooks, V.; Sikes, P. & Husbands, C. (1997) The good mentor guide: Initial teacher education in secondary school. Philadelphia : Open University Press.
    Carr-Saunders, A. M. (1933) The profession. Oxford: Claredon press.
    Daloz, L. A. (1986) Effective teaching and mentoring. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass.
    Enerson, D. M. (2001) Mentoring as metaphor: An opportunity for innovation and renewal. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 85, 7-13.
    Fessler, R. (1992) The teacher career cycle. In Fessler, R. & Christensen, J. C. (Ed.), The teacher career cycle: Understanding and guiding the professional development of teachers (pp. 21-44). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Foucault, M. (1982) On the genealogy of the modern individual. In Freyfus, H & Rovinow, M. (Eds.) Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 104-207). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Fuller, F. & Brown, O. (1975) Becoming a teacher. In Ryan, K. (Ed.), Teacher education, seventy-fourth yearbook of the national society for the study of education, part 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Furlong, V. J. (1988) Initial teacher training and the role of the school. Milton Keynes, England; Philadelphia: Open University Press.
    Furlong, J. & Maynard, T. (1995) Mentoring student teachers: the growth of professional knowledge. London and NewYork: Routledge.
    Furman, G. C. (1998) Postmodernism and community in schools: Unraveling the paradox. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(3), 298-328.
    Gibson, M. (1984) Approaches to multi-cultural education in the United States: Some concepts and assumptions. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 15, 94-120.
    Guillaume, A. & Rudney, G. (1993) Student teachers’ growth towards independence: an analysis of their changing concerns, Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(1), 65-80.
    Hargreaves, A., Earl, L. & Ryan, J. (1996) Schooling for change: Reinventing education for early adolescents. London; Washington, D.C.: Falmer Press.
    Hawsam, R. B. & Stanford, B. H. (2000) Teaching: Your chosen profession. In Parkay F. W. (Ed.), Becoming a teacher(pp.409-442). Boston, Mass: Allyn and Bacon.
    Herndon, K. M. & Fauske, J. R. (1996) Analyzing mentoring practices through teachers’ journal. Teacher Education Quarterly, 23(4), 27-44.
    Hill, A., Jennings, M. & Madgewick, B. (1992) Initiating a mentorship training programme. In Wilkin, M. (Ed.), Mentoring in schools. London: Kogan Page.
    Hoffman, D. M. (1996) Culture and self in multicultural education: Reflections on discourse, text, and practice. American Educational Research Journal, 33(3), 545-569.
    Hogan, H. & Maglienti, M. (2001) Comparing the epistemological underpinning of students’ and scientists’ reasoning about conclusions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 663-687.
    Kloss, R. J. (1994) A nudge is best. College teaching. 42(4), 151-158.
    Marshall, K. (1991) An assessment of the “outcomes” approach to education and training, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 15(3), 50-64.
    Maynard, T. (2001) The student teacher and the school community of practice: a consideration of “learning as participation”. Cambridge Journal of Education, 31(1), 39-52.
    McIntyre,D. & Hagger, H. (1996) Mentors in schools: developing the profession of teaching. London: David Fulton.
    McMillan, D. W. & Chavis, D. M. (1986) Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6-23.
    Orland-Barak, L. (2001) Learning to mentor as learning a second language of teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 31(1), 53-68.
    Osterman, K. F. (2000) Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 323-367.
    Parson, T. (1959) The school class as a social system, some of it’s functions in American society. Harvard Educational Review, 29, 297-310.
    Perry, W. G. Jr. (1968) Forms of intellectual and ethical developments in college years. New York: Holt, Rinehant and Winston.
    Schein, E. H. (1985) Organisational culture and leadership: A dynamic view. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Schon, D. A. (1983) The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. NewYork: Basic Books.
    Shaw, R. (1992) Teacher training in secondary schools. London: Kogan Page.
    Sleeter, C. E. (1996) Multicultural education as school activism. Albany: State University of New York Press.
    Smith, P. L., Harris, C. M., Sammons, L., Waters, J., Jordan, D., Mratin, D., Smith, N., & Cobb, P. (2001) Using multimedia portfolios to assess preservice teacher and p-12 student learning. Action in Teacher Education. 32(4), 28-39.
    Stachowski, L. L. & Mahan, J. M. (1998) Cross-cultural field placements:student teachers learning from schools and communities. Theory into Practice, 37(2), 155-162.
    Unruh, A. & Turner, H. E. (1970) Supervision for change and innovation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    Van Manen, M. (1977) Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6, 205-228.
    Williams, A. (1993) Teacher perceptions of their needs as mentors in the contexts of developing school-based initial teacher education. British Educational Research Journal, 19(4), 407-420.
    Yeomans, R. & Sampson, J. (1994) Mentorship in the primary school. London: The Falmer Press.
    Zachary, L. J. (2000) The mentor’s guide: Facilitating effective learning relationship. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Zeichner, K. M. & Liston, D. P. (1996) Reflective teaching: a introduction. New Jersey: Lawrence erlbaum associates, publishers.

    QR CODE