研究生: |
魏嘉新 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
模組化概念運用於教學設備設計之研究—以生活科技教學示範桌設計為例 Research of using modular concept for teaching aid design - the design of living technology teaching demostration desk |
指導教授: | 吳千華 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
設計學系 Department of Design |
論文出版年: | 2005 |
畢業學年度: | 93 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 107 |
中文關鍵詞: | 生活科技教學需求 、講桌設計 、模組化設計 、科技教室 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:125 下載:18 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在我國國民義務教育階段,科技教育的實施以「生活科技」課程為主,其主要由以前的「工藝」課程轉型而來,課程目標著重培養學生認識科技、使用工具、啟發創造力及問題解決能力等。生活科技教師的教學大致可分成知識講授及操作示範兩大部份,上課時為提高學生學習興趣,促進學習效果,達成學習目標,教師往往必須藉助電腦、多媒體、網路或使用教具等進行教學。講桌可說是跟教師最親近也是最能提供協助的教學設備,目前使用的講桌多是十幾年前的產物,其適用性隨著時代變遷應該有所不同才是,因此本研究認為有重新設計研究之必要,並將學校用講桌更名為「教學示範桌」,使其更符合教學需求及使用狀況。
本研究藉由相關調查及專家訪問來探討生活科技課程及教師在教學時之相關需求,歸納整理出「生活科技教學示範桌需求要項」,再依需求要項界定各項單元模組,運用模組化概念進行生活科技教學示範桌之設計研究,並將研究結果加以設計應用,以期改善目前生活科技教室講桌之設計。最後由專家進行適用性評估,結果顯示本研究所設計之教學示範桌在各方面都能有相當不錯的表現,若能實現,將對生活科技之教學有極大的幫助。
本研究所獲得研究結論如下:(1)目前生活科技教學用講桌確實無法滿足教學之需求,教師需要更合適的教學示範桌以輔助教學活動之進行。(2)生活科技教學主要分成知識講授及示範操作兩大部份,教學示範桌設計應以教師為中心,並能滿足兩大部份不同之需求。(3)資訊多媒體融入教學已是必然之趨勢,教學示範桌設計應考量資訊及多媒體設備之整合,以方便教師操作使用。(4)運用模組化概念進行教學示範桌之設計,能滿足不同的環境空間,並依教學需求自由選配,使教學示範桌更具變化性及實用性,是相當可行的設計方式。
關鍵字:生活科技教學需求、講桌設計、模組化設計、科技教室
At the national compulsory education stage in our country, the implementation of technology education relies mainly on “living technology” courses, it is the transition of the course “craft” in the past, the course goals emphatically train students to realize technology, use tools, inspire creativity and problem-solving ability etc. The teaching of living technology can roughly divide into knowledge tuition and operating demonstration. In order to improve student's interest of studying in class, promote the results of learning and reach the goals of studying, teachers must often make use of computer, multimedia, network or the teaching aids. Teacher’s desk can be regarded as the most aidant equipment for a teacher‘s teaching. The ones we use now are mostly results before more than ten years, and its suitability should be different to some extent with era changes. It is necessary to redesign to make it accord with the teaching demand even more.
The research examined the demands of living technology teachers by relevant investigation and expert interview, generalized some items of living technology teaching demonstration desk, organized the modules to research improving the design of the desk at present. Finally, the experts carries on the suitability assessment. The result shows that there can be pretty good behavior in the teaching demonstration desk that this research institute designs, if it can realize, there will be extremely helpful to teaching of living technology.
This research institute is studied the conclusion as follows:(1)Teachers need more suitable teaching demonstration desks with the going on of teaching activities.(2)The teaching of living technology can divide into knowledge tuition and operating demonstration, the teaching demonstration desk should be designed by regarding teacher as the center, and can meet the two parts of demands.(3)Teaching demonstration desk should merge the multimedia equipments, in order to facilitate teacher's operation.(4)Using the module concepts to carry on the design of the teaching demonstration desk can satisfy different environments. It makes the desks more diverse and practicable and is a quite feasible design.
中文部份
1.刁榮茂(1998)。動力夾頭模組化設計。國立中興大學機械工程學系,碩士論文。教育部(1994)。國民中學家政與生活科技課程標準。台北:正中。
2.方崇雄(1996)。科技教室的規畫理念與實務。中學工藝教育,29(1),9-16。
3.李隆盛(1996)。科技與職業教育的課題。台北:師大。
4.李隆盛(1997)。科技與職業教育的前景。台北:師大。
5.李隆盛(1999)。科技與職業教育的展望。台北:師大。
6.李隆盛(1996)。國中生活科技的教學活動與設備規畫。中學工藝教育,29(4),2-10。
7.李隆盛(2000),國中生活科技課程計劃的研訂。生活科技教育,33(10),2-6。
8.呂廣英(1986)。簡化模組化設計與應用。機械月刊,四月出版,121-125。
9.林天祥(2003)。模組化設計模式(MDM)之理論與應用—以自行車為例,國立成功大學工業設計研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南。
10.孫增興(2003)。模組化客廳櫥櫃設計之研究。私立大同大學工業設計研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
11.教育部(2000)。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。台北:教育部。
12.黃能堂(1995),生活科技教材教法。教育實習輔導季刊,1(5),35-42。
13.黃裕哲(2001)。綠色模組化設計之評估架構研究—以電動自行車組裝與拆解為例,私立大葉大學設計研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化。
14.楊明津(1999)。系統家具之沿革與發展。台灣家具通鑑(頁74-97)。台北:台灣區家具工業同業工會。
15.蔡錫濤(1995),國中生活科技課程內涵及教學策略探討。中學工藝教育,28(1),10-15。
16.顏郁欣(2000)。台北市立國民中學生活科技教室空間與設備之研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
外文部份
1.Braybrooke, S. (Ed.). (1986). Design for research: Principles of laboratory architecture. New York: Wiley Interscience.
2.Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark(2000). Design Rules, The Power of Modularity. The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London England.
3.Florida Department of Education. (1997). A Design Handbook For Technology Education Facilities And Other Related Programs. ED 414 422.
4.Komacek, S. A. & Bolyard, G. (1990). The learning environment for transportation technology education. In Tracy, W. E., Jr. (Ed.), Technology education symposium XII. Worcester, MA: Davis Publication and New Britain, CT: Central Connecticut State University.
5.Kamrani, Ali K.(2000).Product Design for Modularity, Boston Kluwer Academic Publishers. P.19-22.
6.Missouri State Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (1991). Missouri industrial technology / technology education Guide. Columbia, MO: Author.
7.Maryland Education Department (1994). Technology education facilities guidelines. ED(387116).
8.Polette, D. L. (Ed.). (1991). Planning technology teacher education learning environments. Report of the Council on Technology Teacher Education. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.
9.Peter O’Grady(1999).The Age of Modularity, Adams and Steele Publishers. Iowa City, IOWA, P.12-18.
10.Ron Sanchez and Joseph T. Mahoney(1996).Modularity, Flexibility, and Management in Product and Organization Design, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, (pp. 353-370).
11.Shirley, Gordon V.(1992).Modular Design and Manufacturing for Competitive Manufacturing, Integrating Design and Manufacturing for Competitive Advantage. (pp. 82-103).