我國政府於2014年推動十二年國教，首先大幅變更高中入學制度，同年11月，教育部公告十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱，並確定於108學年度起實施。總綱首度將「自主學習」納入高中階段學校正式課程，教育部亦於2018年2月頒佈「高級中等學校課程規劃及實施要點」，更明訂「自主學習」之實施規範與時數下限。本研究關注實踐高中自主學習課程化的現況與挑戰，學校面對自主學習課程化建制化歷程的制度變遷模式為何？學校在不同組織情境脈絡下，如何促成利害關係人參與學生自主學習課程化的制度變遷？研究係以歷史制度論之「路徑依賴」及「關鍵時刻」為概念透鏡，透過五所個案學校的資料搜集與分析，釐清自主學習課程化的學生需求與學校規畫的系統全貌，並一窺學校組織制度變遷的不同模式。本研究的結論有以下四點：
一、自主學習課程化的制度化歷程應提出學校本位的「自主學習」論述
二、學校自主學習運作機制需要為學生設計不同起始點
三、學校自主學習課程化是路徑依賴與關鍵時刻交互作用的結果
四、善用許願式領導的共力場作用有助於組織制度化的發展
最後的研究建議有四點，分別是建議學校應對學生自主學習提出學校本位的論述，並依此論述發展學生自主學習課程發展自我檢核表；建議學校校長應重視組織制度化歷程的路徑依賴與關鍵時刻的交互作用，運用建制學習，達成組織變革；建議學校的課程領導人善用許願式領導，以促成自主學習課程化之制度變遷；建議學校自主學習課程化的課程決定者，能覺察組織制度化路徑依賴現象，並透過鏡映練習，發現關鍵時刻，採取最適決策，讓新課綱的高中學生自主學習課程化的理想能在不同的學校達成學校本位的實踐。

This case study explores the institutionalization of self-regulation learning in five senior high schools using qualitative approaches with the conceptualizations of path dependence and critical juncture. In 2014, the government of Taiwan released the Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education-General Guidelines, which unprecedently conducted self-regulation learning as the formal curriculum in the senior high school stage. Further, the Ministry of Education enacted the Direction for Development and Implementing of School-Based Curriculum in Senior High School to clarify the minimum required hours in the implementation of student self-regulation learning.
This study emphasizes how did case schools, which were in different cultural and historical contexts, transform the term self-regulation learning from the Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education-General Guidelines into their school-based curriculum, and how various stakeholders have participated in the institutionalization of self-regulation learning in an individual school.
The findings of this study include: a) the concept of self-regulation learning needs to be institutionalized with the understanding of each school, b) the mechanism, how each school operates the self-regulation learning, should be designed individually to support the needs from students, c) the transition of self-regulation from non-curriculum to curriculum in the school can be generally understood as the results of the interaction effect between the path dependence and critical juncture, and d) the wise usage of the promising leadership is recognized as an opportunity to develop the institutionalization continually.
Based on the findings, this study concludes four main recommendations. First, the discourse of self-regulation learning should be produced locally in each school and formalize it as the self checklist. Second, the school principal should perceive the dynamics of interactions between path dependence and critical juncture during the process of institutionalization, adopting the institutional learning to achieve organizational change. Third, the leaders of the curriculum in the school should adopt the premising leadership wisely to achieve the institutionalization of self-regulation learning. Lastly, the leaders of the curriculum in the school should perceive the transition of path dependence in the organization and discover the critical juncture to propose the proper decision-making through the training of mirrorlike reflectiveness.

中文部分
王文科（2002）。教育研究法。臺北市：五南。
吳建華、謝發昱、黃俊峰、陳銘凱（2004）。個案研究，臺北市：高等教育。
吳新傑（2017）。調適性挑戰與教改問題本質及政策角色的辨析。市北教育學刊，57，15-32。
呂金燮（2018）。Dewey著。學會生活：明日學校的校訓。載於呂金燮、吳毓瑩（譯），明日學校：杜威論學校教育（Schools of Tomorrow）（頁15-36）。臺北：商周文化出版社。
李英明（2005）。新制度主義與社會資本。臺北市：揚智。
林建平（2005）。自律學習的理論與研究趨勢。國教新知，52（2），8-25。
林國明（2003）。到國家主義之路：路徑依賴與全民健保組織體制的形成。臺灣社會學，5，1-71。
林麗娟（2012）。自調式學習。國家教育研究院雙語詞彙，擷取自：http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1678769/
邱文彬、林美珍（2000）。後形式思考與人際關係之容忍性、同理心、自我揭露、自主性之關係。教育心理學報，32（1），67-93。doi:10.6251/BEP.20000525
洪詠善、林佳慧、楊惠娥（2018）。十二年國教課綱自主學習之實踐探究。教育脈動，15，1-9。
洪雯柔（2018）。邁向未來取向、專業治校、學習者中心的十二年國教新課綱：談新課綱對普通高中的衝擊。台灣教育，710，65-71。
香港教育局（2015）。學校課程持續更新：聚焦、深化、持續。香港：作者。
國家教育研究院（2018，11月）國民教育，擷取自 http://history.moe.gov.tw/policy.asp? id=2
張輝誠（2018）。學思達增能：張輝誠的創新教學心法。臺北市：親子天下。
教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。臺北市：作者。
教育部（2018，11月）。重編國語辭典修訂本，擷取自http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/cgiin/cbdic/gsweb.cgi?ccd=XorYnf&o= e0&sec=sec1&op=v&view=0-1
教育部（2018，11月）。高級中等學校課程規劃及實施要點，擷取自：www.k12ea.gov.tw/ files/common_unit/f5327438-5380-45ec-b14a-c57fd1fb2bf8/doc/1180_高級中等學校課程規劃及實施要點.pdf
陳佩英等（譯）（2015）。R. Miettinen著。創新、人才、民主：朝向賦能福利國家（Innovation, human capabilities, and democracy: towards an enabling welfare state）.。臺北市：高等教育文化。
陳盈宏（2016）。從協力治理觀點探討國立大學自主治理試辦方案之執行。教育研究與發展期刊，11（3），31-54。
陳蓉怡、廖小娟（2018）。天津濱海新區產業發展之演變：城市治理下中央政府的角色。中國大陸研究，61（1），31-61。
曾建元（2001）。歷史制度論探源。世新大學學報，11，195-206。
馮朝霖（2016）。乘風尋度：教育美學論輯，新竹市：道禾書院。
馮朝霖、范信賢、白亦方（2011）。國民中小學課程綱要系統圖像之研究。新北市：國家教育研究院。
黃宗昊（2010）。歷史制度論的方法立場與理論建構。問題與研究，49（3），145-175。
黃慧莉（2003）。自主性的概念分析。醫護科技學刊，5（2），130-141。
趙志成（2015）。推行自主學習的進路、策略與再思。香港：香港中文大學教育研究所，1-10。
劉曉芬（2006）。歷史制度主義觀點的教育政策分析－以高職轉型綜合高中為例。教育政策論壇，9（2），1-21。
潘慧玲（2003）。社會科學研究典範的流變。教育研究資訊，11（1），115-143。
賴麗珍（譯）（2012）。Wiggins & McTighe著。重理解的課程設計：專業發展實用手冊（Understanding Design）。臺北市：心理。
謝金城（2018）。校長推動十二年國民基本教育新課綱的領導作為。中等教育，69（3），97-110。
鍾聖校（2015）。正向心理情意：教與學（二版）。臺北市：五南。
簡菲莉、陳佩英（2015年11月）。從功能領導到動能領導：實踐探究0與1之間的學校領導。載於中國教育學會主辦之「教育的想像：演化與創新」國際研討會論文集（頁139-160），臺北市。
外文部分
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York, NY: Doubleday & Company.
Boekaerts, M ., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-Regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. An International Review, 54(2), 199-231.
Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445-457.
Boekerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161-186.
Brockett, R. G., & Hiemstra, R. (1991). Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research, and practice. London and New York，NY&UK: Routledge.
Castells, M., & Himanen, P. (2002). The information society and the welfare state: The finnish model. Oxford, UK: The Oxford University Press.
Chambers, R. (2003). Preface. Agricultural System, 78(2), 119-121.
Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). Research Methodsin Education (4th ed.). London,UK: Routledge.
Cooren, F., Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (2006). Communication as organizing: Practical approaches to research into the dynamic of text and conversation. Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
Fioretos, O., Falleti, T. G., & Sheingate, A. (2016). Historical institutionalism in political science. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Goodin, R. E. (1996). The Theory of Institutional Design. New York,NY: Cambridge University Press.
Green, S. (2004). A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 653-669.
Green, S., Li, Y., & Nohria, N. (2009). Suspended in self-spun webs of significance: A rhetorical model of institutionalization and institutionally embedded agency. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 11-36.
Heifetz, R. A. (1998). Leadership without easy answers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Heifetz, R. A., & Linsky, M. (2002). Leadership on the line: Staying alive through the dangers of leading. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
Hendry, J. (2000). Strategic decision making, discourse, and strategy as social practice. Journal of Management Studies, 37(7), 955-977.
Jossberger, H., Brand-Gruwel, S., Boshuizen, H., & van de Wiel, M. (2010). The challenge of self-directed and self-regulated learning in vocational education: A theoretical analysis and synthesis of requirements. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 62(4), 415-440.
Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. New York, NY: Association Press.
Krasner, S. D. (1984). Approach to the state: Alternative conceptions and historical dynamics. Comparative Politics, 16, 223-246.
Langley, A., & Fenton, C. (2011). Strategy as practice and the narrative turn. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1171-1196.
Lawrence, T. (1999). Institutional strategy. Journal of Management, 25(2), 161-187.
Loyens, S., Magda, J., & Rikers, R. (2008). Self-directed learning in problem-based learning and its relationships with self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 411-427.
Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). Explaining institutional change: Agency, ambiguity and power, Cambridge. Retrieved from http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/75276/1/Book_review_Thelen_and_Mahoney.pdf
Mahoney, J., Mohamedali K., & Nguyen, C. (2016). Causality and time in historical institutionalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
Miettinen, R. (2013). Innovation, human capabilities, and democracy: Towards an enabling welfare state. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance, Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pierson, P. (1996). The path to European integration: A historical institutionalism analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 29(2), 123-163.
Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Revies, 94(2), 251-267.
Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time history, institutions, and social analysis. NJ,Princeton University Press.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92-104.
Reijo, M. (2013). Innovation, human capabilities, and democracy: Towards an enabling welfare state. Published to Oxford Scholarship Online
Robertson, J. (2011). The educational affordances of blogs for self-directed learning. Computers and Education, 57, 1628-1644.
Saks, K., & Leijen, A. (2014). Distinguishing self-directed and self-regulated learning and measuring them in the e-learning context. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 190-198.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Self-Regulation in Education: Retrospect and Prospect. In D. H. Schunk, & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. Issues and Educational Applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Selznick, P. (1996). Institutionalism old and new. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2), 270-277.
Smith, R. C. (1993，May). Images of organizational communication: Root metaphors of the organization–communication relation. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Annual Conference, Washington DC
Spee, A. P., & Jarzabkowski, P. (2011). Strategic planning as communicative process. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1217-1245.
Steinberg, L. A. (2010). Dual systems model of adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Psychobiology, 52, 216-224.
Steinmo, S. Thelen, & K.Longstret, F. (1992). Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis.Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press.
Suddaby, R., Elsbach, K., Greenwood, R., Meyer, J. W., & Zilber, T. (2010). Organizations and their institutional environments-bringing meaning, values, and culture back in: Introduction to the special research forum. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1234-1240.
Taylor, J. R. (2011). Organization as an (imbricated) configuring of transactions. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1273-1294.
Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (2000). The emergent organization. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
The Economist (2018). It has the world’s best schools, but Singapore wants better. (Retrieved at November 12th 2018 ) Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/asia/2018/08/30/it-has-the-worlds-best-schools-but-singapore-wants-better
Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review,2,369-404.
Watts, Richard J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press
Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Michigan, MI: A Sage Publications Series.
Wolcott, H. (1990). Writing up qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
World Economic Forum (2017). Realizing human potential in the fourth industrial revolution an agenda for leaders to shape the future of education, gender and work. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_EGW_Whitepaper.pdf
Zilber, T. (2007). Stories and the discursive dynamics of institutional entrepreneurship: The case of israeli high-tech after the bubble. Organization Studies, 28(7), 1035-1054.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Become a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attainment of Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective. In Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P.R. and Zeidner, M (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego,CA: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B.J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001) . Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives.(2nd edition). London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zimmerman, D. H. (1992). The interactional organization of calls for emergency assistance. In P. Drew, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work. Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 418-469). Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press.