簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 梁嘉音
Chia-yin Liang
論文名稱: 籃球罰球投籃之特定技能效應
Especial skill effects on basketball free-throw
指導教授: 卓俊伶
Jwo, Jun-Ling
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 體育學系
Department of Physical Education
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 111
中文關鍵詞: 籃球罰球投籃定點投籃特定技能視覺情境練習專家
英文關鍵詞: basketball, free-throw, set shot, especial skills, visual context, practice, expert
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:188下載:20
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討視覺情境、表現情境、技能水準與練習量對罰球投籃特定技能的影響。實驗一以12位專家男生籃球員為參加者,在不同罰球投籃視覺情境、變化罰球投籃距離-力量表現情境中各進行20次定點投籃,依變項為投籃準確性,經重複量數二因子變異數分析、簡單線性廻歸分析,結果發現:(一) 罰球投籃準確性在視覺情境變項皆未達到統計顯著差異,而特定與非特定罰球投籃視覺情境的罰球投籃實際值與預測值皆未高於1個估計標準誤值;(二) 特定與非特定罰球投籃視覺情境的罰球線與鄰近距離投籃準確性皆未達統計顯著差異;(三) 罰球投籃準確性在表現情境變項有達到統計顯著差異,且特定與非特定距離-力量表現情境的罰球投籃實際值與預測值未高於1個估計標準誤值。在實驗二以專家女生籃球員和具有籃球經驗的學生各12人為參加者,分別在正常與低知覺-行動表現情境各200次試投,經混合設計三因子變異數分析,結果發現未達到統計顯著差異,比較罰球投籃實際值與預測值均未顯示高於1個估計標準誤值。依此,本研究的結論為:(一) 罰球投籃特定技能表現不受視覺情境的影響;(二) 罰球投籃特定技能效應在鄰近投籃距離的投籃表現會產生類化效果;(三) 罰球投籃特定技能表現不受不同罰球投籃距離-力量表現情境的影響;(四) 罰球投籃特定技能會受練習量與技能水準的影響。

    This study was designed to examine the effects of visual contexts, conditions of performance, skill levels, and amounts of practice on basketball free-throw’s especial skill. Twelve expert male basketball players served as participants in experiment 1. Each participant performed 20 set shots at two visual contexts and alteration distance-force conditions. Dependent variable was shooting accuracy. Two way repeated measures ANOVA and simple linear regression analysis revealed that (1) The accuracy of free-throw shooting was found no significant difference on visual context. The actual and expected values at the foul line were found no higher than one SEest in both specific and non-specific foul line visual contexts; (2) In two visual contexts, the accuracy of free-throw shooting between foul line and closer distances were found no significant difference; and (3) For accuracy of free-throw shooting, significant difference was found in performance variable. The actual and expected values at the foul line was found no higher than one SEest in both specific and non-specific distance-force conditions. Twelve expert female basketball players and twelve basketball-experienced female students served as participants in experiment 2. Each participant performed 200 set shots at normal and low perception-action conditions. The mixed-design three-way ANOVA analysis revealed that skill level and amounts of practice were found significant difference. The actual and expected values at the foul line was no higher than one SEest in both normal and low perception-action conditions. It was concluded that: (1) Visual context had no effect on especial skill of free-throw shooting; (2) The generalization effects of especial skill was found in neighboring shooting distances; (3) Different distance-force conditions had no effect on especial skill of free-throw shooting; and (4) Skill levels and amounts of practice had effects on especial skill of free-throw shooting.

    口試委員與系主任簽字之論文通過簽名表..........................i 授權書....................................................ii 中文摘要.................................................iii 英文摘要..................................................iv 謝誌.......................................................v 目次......................................................vi 圖次......................................................ix 表次......................................................xi 第壹章 緒論................................................1 第一節 問題背景........................................1 第二節 研究目的.......................................12 第三節 研究限制、範圍與假定............................13 第四節 名詞解釋.......................................14 第五節 研究的重要性...................................16 第貳章 基模理論基礎與相關文獻探討...........................18 第一節 基模理論.......................................18 第二節 基模理論的相關文獻..............................21 第三節 基模理論的限制..................................30 第四節 文獻小結.......................................32 第參章 實驗一:特定技能之視覺情境與力量參數效應..............34 第一節 問題背景.......................................34 第二節 研究問題與假說..................................39 第三節 方法...........................................41 第四節 結果...........................................51 第五節 討論...........................................57 第肆章 實驗二:特定技能的練習效應............................62 第一節 問題背景.......................................62 第二節 研究問題與假說..................................66 第三節 方法...........................................67 第四節 結果...........................................74 第五節 討論...........................................81 第伍章 綜合討論............................................84 第一節 視覺情境對籃球罰球投籃特定技能的影響..............84 第二節 籃球罰球特定技能的參數化能力.....................86 第三節 技能水準、表現情境與練習量對籃球罰球投籃特定技能 的影響.........................................87 第陸章 結論與建議..........................................89 第一節 結論...........................................89 第二節 建議...........................................90 引用文獻..................................................92 中文部份..............................................92 英文部分..............................................92 附錄.....................................................102 附錄一 實驗一參加者需知與同意書.......................103 附錄二 實驗二參加者需知與同意書.......................104 附錄三 各項統計分析摘要表與事後比較表..................105

    中文部份
    中華民國籃球協會 (2010)。2010國際籃球規則。台北市:中華民國籃球協會技術委員會。
    中華民國籃球協會 (2011)。歷屆成績【攻守資料庫】。取自http://player.basketball-tpe.org/files/11-1001-98.php
    林清山 (1992)。心理與教育統計學。臺北市:東華。
    林靜兒、卓俊伶、張智惠、謝扶成 (2003)。兒童在相對時宜工作的參數學習:檢驗變異練習假說。臺灣運動心理學報,2,47-59。
    卓俊伶 (2004)。老年人相對時宜動作表現與學習的練習變異效應。臺灣運動心理學報,5,87-99。
    梁嘉音、卓俊伶、簡曜輝 (1998)。距離對籃球投籃動作型式的影響:個案研究。體育學報,25,199-208。
    陳淑惠、卓俊伶、梁嘉音 (2003)。籃球投籃型式之功能性反應及其經驗效應。臺灣運動心理學報,2,61-76。

    英文部分
    Abrams, R. A., Meyer, D. E., & Kornblum, S. (1989). Speed and accuracy of saccadic eye movement: Characteristics of impulse variability in the oculomotor system. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 529-543.
    Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111-150.
    Adams, J. A., Goetz, E. T., & Marshall, P. H. (1972). Response produced feedback and motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 391-397.
    Barnet, M. L., Ross, D., Schmidt, R. A., & Todd, B. (1973). Motor skills learning and the specificity of training principle. Research Quarterly, 44, 440-447.
    Bernstein, N. A. (1967). The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    Bruce, D. (1994). Lashley and the problem of serial order. The American Psychologist, 49, 93-103.
    Breslin, G., Hodges, N. J., Kennedy, R., Hanlon, M., & Williams, A. M. (2010). An especial skill: Support for a learned parameters hypothesis. Acta Psychologica, 10, 10-16.
    Carson, L. M., & Wiegand, R. L. (1979). Motor schema formation and retention in young children: A test of Schmidt’s schema theory. Journal of Motor Behavior, 11, 247-252.
    Catalano, J. F., & Kleiner, B. M. (1984). Distant transfer and practice variability. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 851-856.
    Courneya, K. S., & Carron, A. V. (1992). The home advantage in sport competitions: A literature review. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14, 13-27.
    Davies, G. M., & Thomson, D. M. (1988). Memory in context: Context in memory. New York: Wiley.
    de Oliveira, R. F., Oudejans, R. D., & Beek, P. J. ( 2009). Experts appear to use angle of elevation information in basketball shooting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 750-761.
    Dick, M. B., Hsieh, S., Dick-Muehlke, C., Davis, D. S., & Cotman, C. W. (2000). The variability of practice hypothesis in motor learning: Does it apply to Alzheimer’s disease? Brain and Cognition, 44, 470-489.
    Eich, J., Weingartner, H., Stillman, R. C., & Gillen, J. C. (1975). State-dependent accessibility of retrieval cues in the retention of a categorized list. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 408-417.
    Ericss, K. A. (2003). Development of elite performance and deliberate practice: An update from the perspective of the expert performance approach. In J. L. Starkes & K. A. Ericss (Eds.), Expert performance in sport: A advances in research on sport expertise (pp. 49-81). Charmpaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.
    Especial (n.d.). In Webster’s online dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.webster-dictionary.org/definition/especial
    Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    Goodwin, J.E., Grime, C. R., Eckerson, J. M., & Gordon, P. M. (1998). Effect of different quantities of variable practice on acquisition, retention, and transfer of an applied motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87, 147-151.
    Graydon, J., & Griffin, M. (1996). Specificity and variability of practice with young children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83, 83-88.
    Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 212-224.
    Guthrie, E. R. (1935). The psychology of learning. New York: Harper.
    Hall, K. G., Domingues, D. A., & Cavazos, R. (1994). Contextual interference effects with skilled baseball players. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 835-841.
    Hardy, L., & Parfitt, G. (1991). A catastrophe model of anxiety and performance. British Journal of Psychology, 82, 163-178.
    Hays, D., & Krause, J. V. (1987). Score on the throw. The Basketball Bulletin, Winter, 4-9.
    Hebert, E. P., Landin, D., & Solmon, M. A. (1996). Practice schedule effects on the performance and learning of law- and high-skilled students: An applied study. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67, 52-58.
    Helsen, W. F., Starkes, J. L., & Hodges, N. J. (1998). Team sport and the theory of deliberate practice. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 20, 12-24.
    Henry, F. M. (1958). Reliability, measurement error, and intra-individual difference. Research Quarterly, 30, 21-24.
    Henry, F. M. (1968). Specificity vs. generality in learning motor skill. In R. C. Brown & G. S. Kenyon (Eds.), Classical studies on physical activity (pp. 341-340). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Hodges, N. J., Edwards, C., Luttin, S., & Bowcock, A. (2011). Learning from the experts: Gaining insights into best practice during the acquisition of three novel motor skills. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82, 178-187.
    Jenkins, R. (1977). Win the big ones from the foul line. Scholastic Coach, 47, 88-89.
    Jordan, M. I. (1995). The organization of action sequences: Evidence from a relearning task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 179-192.
    Keetch, K. M., Schmidt, R. A., Lee, T. D., & Young, D. E. (2005). Especial skills: Their emergence with massive amounts of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 970-978.
    Keetch, K. M., Lee, T. D., & Schmidt, R. A. (2008). Especial skills: Specificity embedded within generality. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30, 723-736.
    Kelso, J. A. S. (1982). Concepts and issues in human motor behavior: Coming to grips with the jargon. In J. A. S. Kelso (Ed.), Human motor behavior: An introduction (pp. 21-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Kerr, R., & Booth, B. (1978). Specific and varied practice of motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 395-401.
    Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavior science (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
    Kluka, D. A. (1999). Motor behavior: Learning and performance. Englewood, CO: Morton.
    Kozar, B., Vaughn, R. E., Whitfield, K. E., Lord, R. H., & Dye, B. (1994). Importance of free-throws at various stages of basketball games. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 243-248.
    Krigolson, O. E., & Tremblay, L. (2009). The amount of practice really matters: Specificity of practice may be valid only after sufficient practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80, 197-204.
    Krause, J. V., Meyer, D., & Meyer, J. (1999). Basketball skill & drills (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    Kulgler, P. N., Kelso, J. A. S., & Turvey, M. T. (1980). On the concept of coordinative structures as dissipative structures: I. Theoretical lines of convergence. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 3-47). Amsterdam: Elsvier.
    Kulgler, P. N., Kelso, J. A. S., & Turvey, M. T. (1982). On the control and co-ordination of naturally developing systems. In J. A. S. Kelso & J. E. Clark (Eds.), The development of movement control and co-ordination (pp. 5-78). New York: Wiley.
    Lashly K. S. (1942). The problem of cerebral organization in vision. In J. Cattell (Ed.), Biological symposia. Vol. VII. Visual mechanisms (pp. 112-146). Lancaster, PA: Jaques Cattell Press.
    Lee, T. D., Magill, R. A., & Week, D. J. (1985). Influence of practice schedule on testing schema theory predictions in adults. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 283-299.
    Lee, T. D., Swinnen, S. P., & Serrien, D. J. (1994). Cognitive effort and motor learning. Quest, 46, 328-344.
    Liang, C. Y., Jwo, H., & Yang, C. M. (2011, January). Functional transfer of basketball: An examination of especial skill [Abstract]. Program (p.192). Taipei, Taiwan: 2011 ICHPER.SD Asia Congress.
    Liu, S., & Burton, A. W. (1999). Changes in basketball shooting patterns as a function of distance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89, 831-845.
    Magill, R. A. (2007). Motor learning and control: Concept and applications (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
    McCraken, H. D., & Stelmach, G. E. (1977). A test of the schema theory of discrete motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 9, 193-201.
    Mersky, M. J. (1987). Coaching and teaching the free-throw shooter. The Basketball Clinic, 19(5), 8-11.
    National Collegiate Athletic Association. (2010a). NCAA Division Ι men’s basketball statistical trends [Data file]. Retrieved from http://web1.ncaa.org/web_files/stats/m_basketball_RB/Reports/All-time%20Statistical%20Trends%20chart.pdf
    National Collegiate Athletic Association. (2010b). NCAA women’s basketball Division Ι statistical trends history since 1981-82 [Data file]. Retrieved from http://web1.ncaa.org/web_files/stats/w_basketball_RB/misc/trends09.pdf
    Palladino, G. (1980). The free-throw: An in-depth analysis. The Basketball Clinic, 12(6). 7-11.
    Pim, R. (1986). The effect of personal fouls on winning and losing basketball games. The Coaching Clinic, 24(4), 14-16.
    Park, J. H., & Shea, C. H. (2003). The effects of practice on effector transfer. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35, 33-40.
    Park, J. H., & Shea, C. H. (2005). Sequence learning: Response structure and effector transfer. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 387-419.
    Patla, A. E., Frank, J. S., Allard, F., & Thomas, E. (1985). Speed-accuracy characteristics of saccadic eye movement. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 411-419.
    Proteau, L. (1992). On the specificity of learning and the role of visual information for movement control. In L. Proteau & D. Elliott (Eds.), Vision and motor control (pp.67-103). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    Proteau, L., Marteniuk, R. G., & Levesque, L. (1992). A sensorimotor basis for motor learning: Evidence indicating specificity of practice. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 557-575.
    Ryan, D., & Holt, L. E. (1989). Kinematic variables as predictors of performance in the basketball free-throw. The Basketball Bulletin, Summer, 60-63.
    Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
    Schmidt, R. A. (1977). Schema theory: Implications for movement education. Motor Skill: Theory into Practice, 2, 36-38.
    Schmidt, R. A. (2003). Motor schema theory after 27 years: Reflections and implications for a new theory. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 366-375.
    Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2011). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    Schmidt, R. A., & White, J. L. (1972). Evidence for an error detection mechanism in motor skills: A test of Adams’ closed-loop theory. Journal of Motor Behavior, 4, 143-153.
    Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (2008). Motor learning and performance: A situation-based learning approach (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H. N., & Frank, J. S. (1978). Sources of inaccuracy in rapid movement. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.). Information processing in motor control and learning (pp.183-203). New York: Academic Press.
    Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H. N., Hawkins, B., Frank, J. S., & Quinn, J. T. (1979). Motor-output variability: A theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychological Review, 86, 415-451.
    Schoenfelt, E. L., Snyder, L. A., Maue, A. E., McDowell, C. P., & Woolard, C. D. (2002). Comparison of constant and variable practice conditions on free-throw shooting. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 94, 1113-1123.
    Schuetzle, R. K. (1988). The relationship of free-throw shooting to game outcome. The Basketball Bulletin, Fall, 30.
    Schulze, P. (1981). Concentration key to free-throw success. The Basketball Clinic, 13(6), 6-8.
    Shapiro, D. C., & Schmidt, R. A. (1982). The schema theory: Recent evidence and developmental implications. In J. A. S. Kelso & J. E. Clark (Eds.), The development of movement control and co-ordination (pp. 113-150). New York: Wiley.
    Shea, C. H., & Kohl, R. (1991). Composition of practice: Influence on retention of motor skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62, 187-195.
    Sherwood, D. E., & Lee, T. D. (2003). Schema theory: Critical review and implications for the role of cognition in a new theory of motor learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 376-382.
    Shea, C. H., & Wulf, G. (2005). Schema theory: A critical appraisal and reevaluation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37, 85-101.
    Shea, C. H., Lai, Q., Wright, D. L., Immink, M., & Black, C. (2001). Consistent and variable practice conditions: Effect on relative and absolute timing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 139-152.
    Simons, J. P., Wilson, J. M., Wilson, G. J., & Theall, S. (2009). Challenges to cognitive bases for an especial motor skill at the regulation baseball pitching distance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80, 469-479.
    Smith, S. M., & Vela, E. (2001). Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 203-220.
    Starkes, J. L., Deakin, J., Allard, F., Hodges, N. J., & Hayes, A. (1996). Deliberate practice in sport: What is it anyway? In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The role to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sport, and games (pp. 81-106). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    sullivan, K. J., Kantak, S. S., & Burtner, P. A. (2008). Motor learning in children: Feedback effects on skill acquisition. Physical Therapy, 88, 720-732.
    Thorndike, E. L. (1903). Educational psychology. New York: Columbia University Press.
    Thorndike, E. L., & Woodworth, R. S. (1901). The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. Psychological Review, 8, 247-261.
    van Rossum, J. H. A. (1990). Schmidt’s schema theory: The empirical base of the variability of practice hypothesis. Human Movement Science, 9, 387-435.
    Wallace, S. A., & Hagler, R. W. (1979). Knowledge of performance and the learning of a closed motor skill. Research Quarterly, 50, 265-271.
    Ward, P., Hodges, N. J., Williams, A. M., & Starkes, J. L. (2004). De liberate practice and expert performance: Defining the path to excellence. In A. M. Williams & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: research, theory and practice (pp. 231-258). London: Routledge.
    Williams, A. M., & Hodges, N. J. (2005). Practice, instruction and skill acquisition: Challenging tradition. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23, 637-650.
    Williams A. M., & Ericsson, K. A. (2008). Form the guest editors: How do experts learn? Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30, 653-662.
    Williams, A. M., & Ford, P. R. (2008). Expertise and expert performance in sport. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1, 4-18.
    Williams, A. M., Davids, K., & Williams, J. G. (1999). Visual perception and action in sport. London: E. & F. N. Spon.
    Wilson, G., Simons, J. P., Wilson, J., & Rodriguez, W. (2007). The nonemergence of an especial skill: Good is not enough. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 29 (Supplement), S140-S141.
    Winstein, C. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (1990). Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 677-691.
    Wright, D. L., & Shea, C. H. (1994). Cognition and motor skill acquisition: Contextual dependent. In C. R. Reynolds (Ed.), Cognitive assessment: A multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 89-106). New York: Plenum.
    Wrisberg, C. A., & Ragsdale, M. R. (1979). Further tests of Schmidt’s schema theory: Development of a schema rule for a coincident timing task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 11, 159-166.
    Wulf, G., & Lee, T. D. (1993). Contextual interference in movements of the same class: Differential effects on program and parameter learning, Journal of Motor Behavior, 25, 254-263.
    Wulf, G., McNevin, N., Shea, C. H., & Wright, D. L. (1999). Learning phenomena: Future challenges for the dynamical systems approach to understanding the learning of complex motor skills. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 30, 531-557.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE