研究生: |
邱年鴻 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
高職機械群技能選手訓練策略之研究 |
指導教授: | 程金保 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
工業教育學系 Department of Industrial Education |
論文出版年: | 2004 |
畢業學年度: | 92 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 255 |
中文關鍵詞: | 技藝競賽 、技能學習 、選手訓練 、訓練策略 |
英文關鍵詞: | Job skill contest, skill learning, contestant training, training strategy |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:219 下載:36 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
技能水準的提昇除了課程內的教育訓練外,參與技藝競賽彼此相互觀摩學習,是技能推昇非常重要的動能及手段。研究者在技藝競賽機械職類選手訓練領域上摸索了十多年,認為技能訓練除了要有足夠的行政支援與訓練環境外,善用訓練策略的教師及有計畫的訓練,亦是有效技能訓練不可或缺的條件。
本研究的主要目的,在探討機械相關職類技藝競賽選手的訓練策略。訓練策略之优劣取決於競賽成績的表現,它是教師考量現有的訓練條件,選擇有效的訓練方式及本身的經驗,所實施的知識融入、技術分析、方法抉擇以促進訓練效能的構思與執行過程。
本研究的主要發現,選手訓練除了務實正確的技能操作訓練外,還必須認知與動機信念的強化並重,從心理上增進選手訓練的動能與配合策略運用的意願,才能提高訓練的效能。以目前的競賽環境,研究發現顯著影響競賽成績表現的訓練條件,列述如下:
一. 下列五項選手訓練重點 1.訓練動機與激勵,2.行政支援,3.訓練目標設定,4.教師訓練風格,5.引導學習與評量,會顯著影響競賽成績的表現,其執行程度越高競賽成績表現越好。
二. 全國技能競賽與高中工科技藝競賽選手的訓練方式,除了「訓練動機與激勵」外,其餘訓練構面並沒有顯著不同。
三. 選手訓練時間足夠競賽成績表現較好,訓練教師組織方式在競賽成績表現上並沒有顯著的不同。
In addition to the instruction and the training in the formal curriculum, participating in the job skill competition and learning through observation of other competitors will be excellent and powerful means to uplift the students’ skill abilities. The researcher, who has been devoted to training the contestants in the field of the machinery-related job skill for more than ten years, thinks that besides having full administrative support and a better training environment, a teacher who is good at handling the training strategy and perfecting training projects is also a necessity of a successful job skill competition training.
The main purpose of the study was to explore the training strategy of the contestants participating in the job skill contests of machinery-related jobs. The effectiveness of the training strategy will be closely related to the performance of the contestants and the training teacher’s behaviors will have an influence on the grades the contestants get. The teacher’s behaviors, including how he chooses a valid training method, whether he has enough teaching experience in the specified field, which professional content knowledge he has, which technique analysis he adopts to carry out the plan, and how his choice of training method ,will promote the effectiveness of training.
The researcher found that, besides helping contestants properly develop the operation skills, the training teacher must enhance the contestants’ cognition and the learning motivation at the same time. The training teacher must also strengthen the kinesthetic state of mind in contestants and continuously apply practical strategies during the process so that the expected discipline effect(s) can be raised. Given the current contest environment, the researcher found some training factors that will have obvious impact on the contest result. The main findings of the research are as follows:
1. Five different elements of the contestant training-the training motivation and factors of encouragement, the administrative support system, the training target, the teacher's training style, and the training instructions and skill evaluation-would obviously affect the contestants’ performance. The more the five key elements are put into practice, the better result the contestants can reach.
2. Except for the ways to raise the contestants’ motivation and the encouragement, there is no significant difference in the training methods of the contestants for national job skill contest or for the senior high schools job skill contest.
3. Longer and sufficient time provided for the contest training can lead to a better performance of the contestants. However, the organization of teacher’s training project will not obviously influence the performance in contests.
一、中文部分
王福林 (民79)。新制師院學生與師專學生家庭社經地位及其學習行為、學業成就之調查分析。台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
王文科 (民83)。課程與教學論。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。
方炳林 (民68)。教學原理。臺北:教育文物出版社。
尤育士 (民77)。自我肯定訓練對增進高中僑生自我概念及自我肯定輔導效果之研究。國立台灣師範大學心理輔導研究所碩士論文。
台灣省政府教育廳 (民76)。推展公民教育發揮訓導功能實驗研究報告。臺北:台灣書店。
朱敬先 (民75)。學習心理學。臺北:千華。
朱敬先 (民87)。教育心理學。臺北:五南。
朱湘吉 (民83)。教學科技的發展理論與方法。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。
李大偉 (民75)。技職教育測量與評鑑。臺北:三民。
李隆盛 (民85)。科技與職業教育的課題。臺北:師大書苑。
李隆盛 (民86)。科技與職業教育的方向。臺北:師大書苑。
李詠吟、單文經 (民84)。教學原理。臺北:遠流出版社。
李堅萍 (民86)。職教園地 。臺北:龍騰出版社。
李堅萍 (民85)。提升技能教學的練習教學法。技職雙月刊,職教理論,第31期。
李堅萍 (民83)。適合職教的新創意教學法—Jigsaw「皆可熟」教學法。
李堅萍 (民82)。革新傳統教學方式—「皆可熟教學」在技職教育的價值。技職雙月刊,職教理論,第16期。職教園地,三月號。
林幸台 (民76)。生計輔導的理論與實施。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。
林建仲、陳長振譯 (民84) 科技教育的教學方法。中學工藝教育月刊,28,13~20。
林寶山 (民83)。教學原理。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。
林麗娟 (民83)。由動機理論觀電腦繪圖設計。視聽教育雙月刊。
林生傳 (民81)。群性化教學—新教學理論與策略。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。
邵瑞珍、皮連生 (民84)。教育心理學。臺北:五南。
秦葆琦 (民80)。國民小學社會科實驗課程主要教學方法分析。載於國立教育資料館主編之「教育資料集刊第十六輯」,頁235~271。
馬啟偉、張力為 (民85)。體育運動心理學。臺北:東華書局。
徐昊杲、戴建耘、翁上錦 (民83)。八十一學年度台灣區技藝競賽工科工業電子組選手表現差異分析研究。第九屆全國技術及職業教育研討會論文集,一般技職及人文教育類І。
高廣孚 (民82)。教學原理。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。
陳之藩、林松亭、顧柏岩(民67)。工場與相關科目教學法。臺北:中國工業職業教育學會。
陳玉花 (民83)。學生學習責任與成就之探討。學生輔導,三十八期。
彭震球 (民80)。創造性教學之實踐。臺北:五南。
郭為藩 (民79)。自我概念理論在教育上的應用。教師天地,48期。
教育部技術及職業教育司 (民87)。工業職業學校課程標準暨設備標準。臺北。
黃靖雄 (民82)。參加國際技能競賽汽車修護職類選手培訓之研究。職業教育學報,第二期。
黃政傑、李隆盛 (民85)。技職教育概論。臺北:師大書苑。
黃光雄 (民85)。教學理論。高雄:復文書局。
黃振盛 (民87)。高職機械類科學生技能學習影響因素之研究分析。國立彰化師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文。
張新仁 (民71)。國中學生學習行為、學習方法、學習習慣、學習態度之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
張春興、林清山 (民72)。教育心理學。臺北:台灣東華書局。
張春興、林清山 (民78)。教育心理學。臺北:文景。
張添洲 (民81)。我國高級中等學校職業類科學生學習動機及其相關因素之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文。
張景媛 (民83)。國中生數學學習歷程統整模式之研究。教育心理學報 27期,台北:師大教育心理與輔導學系。
程炳林 (民90)。動機、目標設定、行動控制、學習策略之關係:自我調整學習歷程模式之建立及驗證。師大學報,教育類,四十六期。
葉連其 (民89) 另類教學計畫之設計:組合型取向。國民教育研究學報,第六期 嘉義大學國民教育研究所。
湯誌龍 (民87)。精熟學習在技能教學的上的應用。南港高工學報,十六期,台北:南港高工。
湯誌龍 (民89)。應用鷹架理論規劃技能學習教學活動。南港高工學報,十八期。
蓋聶Gagne, R. M. 著,趙居蓮譯 (1985/民86)。學習與教學(The conditions of learning and theory of instruction)。台北:心理。
溫世頌 (民86)。教育心理學。台北: 三民
楊明恭 (民87)。影響高工板金科學生技能學習成效與發展因素之研究。技術學刊,第十三卷,第三期。
楊明恭 (民89)。高工學生自我學習效能與技能學習因應策略之研究。技術學刊,第十五卷,第四期。
蔡玉瑟 (民83)。國小高成就與低成就資優兒童在人格特質、學習行為、生活適應之比較研究。國立台中師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文。
廖文靖 (民88)。影響高職學生技能學習成效的因素。彰師大教育實習輔導季刊,第五卷,第一期。
劉豐旗等 (民87)。技術教育課程之基礎研究─高職機械、電機類科學生技術能力發展之研究(工業電子)。臺北:技職雙月刊。
趙志揚 (民86)。知識與技能的教學策略。教育實習輔導,第二期。
趙志揚、黃振盛 (民87)。影響高職機械類科學生技能學習之相關因素分析。第十三屆全國技術及職業教育研討會論文集,一般技職及人文教育類。
鄧運林 (民84)。成人教學與自我導向學習。台北:五南圖書公司。
錢家興 (民88)。技能選手培訓領導實例之檢討與分析。木柵高工學報,第六期。
謝季宏 (民62)。智力、學習習慣、成就動機及家長社經地位與國中學生學業成就之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
二、外文部分
Aronson,E,(1978).The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills,CA:SagePublication.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice -Hall.
Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248-287.
Blume , R.(1968).How the child sees himself may relate to how the teacher sees himself. Michigan Education Journal, 46.pp9-11.
Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers , policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 2(7), 161-186.
Burden,P.R,&Byrd,D.M.(1994).Methods for effective teaching.Boston:Allyn&Bacon.
Bloom, & Masia,B.A.(1964).A taxonomy of education objectives: Handbook 2, the affective domain. New York:David Mckay.
Clark,C.M.,& Petersen,P.L.(1986).Teachers thought.process In M.C. Wittrock(Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.pp.255-296).New York:Macmillan Publishing.
Carrol,JB.(1963).A model of school learning.Teachers College Record,64.
Davies,I.K. (1981).Instructional technique.n.y.Mcgraw-Hill Book Company, pp. 301-317.
Eccles,J.(1983).Expectancies, values & academ ic behaviors. In J.T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp.75-146). San Francisco:Feeman.
Eccles, J.(1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18,585-609.
Fitts,P.(1962),Factors in compels skill training. In Glaser R.(Ed) Training research and education Pittsburgh University of Pittsburgh press.
Garcia, T., McCann, E. J., Turner, J. E., & Roska, L.(1998).Modeling the mediating role of volition in the learning process. Contemporary Educational Psycho logy, 23, 392-418.
Gredler,M.E.(1991).Learning and instruction:Theory into practice(2ed.Ed).p.257.University of South Carolina. Macmillan Publishing Company.
Keller, J.M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status (C.M. Reigeluth ed.), 386-434, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P.(1990).A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
McCombs, B. L.(1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A phenomenological view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research , and practice (p170-200). New York: Springer.
Maley,D.(1978).The industrial arts teacher,s handbook. Boston:Allyn﹠Bacon.
Maley,D .(1978).The industrial arts teacher,s handbook. Boston:Allyn &Bacon
Miller,W.R.(1990).Instructors and their jobs. Homewood,Ш.:American Technical Publishers.
Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In Cams,& M. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation enhancing environments (vol.6, pp.117-160). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Pintrich, P. R.(1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research,31,459-470.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M.Boekaerts & P.R.,Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp.13-39). San Diego: Academic Press.
Pintrich,P.R.,& De Groot, E.V.(1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance . Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1),33-40.
Pokay, P.,& Blumenfeld, P. C. (1990). Predicting achievement early and late in the semester: The role of motivation and use of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1),41-50.
Reynolds, A. J., & Walberg, H. J.(1992).A structural model of science achievement and attitude:An extension to hight school. Journal of Education Psychology, 84, 371-382.
Schunk,D.H. (1994). Self-regulation of self-efficacy and attributions in academic settings. In D. H., Schunk & B.J., Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp.75-100). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schiefele, U. (1992). Topic interest and levels of test comprehension. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp(Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp.151-182). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Skinner, B.F. (1968). The Technology of Teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Small , R.V., & Gluck ,M.(1994).The relationship of motivational conditions to effective instructional. Educational Technology ,36(8),33-40.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Hangman, E. and Vaker, G.(Trans.). Cambridge, MA:M.I.T. Press.
Walberg,H.J.(1980).Improving the productivity of American schools, Educational Leadership,41(8), pp.19-27.
Wigfield, A. (1994). The role of children’s’ achievement values in the self-regulation of their learning outcomes. In D. H., Schunk & B. J., Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp.101-126). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zimmerman,B.J.(1990).Self-regulating academic learning and achievement:The emergence of a social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychology Review.