本研究旨在探討台灣網路媒體對於台灣國際酷兒影展（TIQFF）與其播映的酷兒電影之討論。本研究以內容分析和主題分析法，蒐集2014年至2019年共六年間的官網和三家台灣網路論壇《女人迷》、《GagaTai嘎嘎台》和《LalaTai拉拉台》對TIQFF和酷兒電影的相關文章，探討其對於TIQFF和酷兒電影的討論以及呈現方式。本研究發現：一、自2015年開始於網路上出現TIQFF與酷兒電影的內容，並以1000字以上的篇幅為主。二、書寫台灣國際酷兒影展與電影多以男同性戀（Gay）電影為主。三、媒體討論酷兒電影時的主要主題分別有主題劇情、延伸討論、電影編導、上映時間、電影演員、電影類型和得獎肯定。四、媒體討論台灣國際酷兒影展時則著重於宣傳影展、理念和代言上，並透過代言人、導演等人分享自身經驗以呼應影展理念，使得閱聽眾在參與過程或是閱讀後能了解他們的想法，進而引發自身的思辨，再與他人討論，形成一文化公共領域。

The purpose of this research is to explore the discussion of the Taiwan International Queer Film Festival (TIQFF) and the queer films in Taiwan’s online media. In particular, the study intends to scrutinize the various facets of content to find out the different ways of presentation of the articals toward TIQFF and queer films in online media. In terms of research design, to study the online text database of the TIQFF’s official websites and the three forums in Taiwan – Womany, GagaTai and LalaTai – as the main sources for data-gathering. Text contents regarding TIQFF and queer films within the six-year time span (2014-2019) were collected, and a sample of 209 text segments was randomly selected for conducting content analysis. The content analysis and the thematic analysis have several significant findings. First of all, the study found that the content of TIQFF and queer movies has appeared on the Internet since 2015, and the content was mainly more than 1,000 words. Secondly, the results indicated that the articles mainly focused on gay movies. Furthermore, the main themes of the media when discussing queer movies were theme, discussion, movie directors, premier, movie actors, movie genres and awards. Lastly, when the media discussed about the Taiwan International Queer Film Festival, they focused on the promotion of the film festival, concept and endorsement, and through the sharing of their own experiences by spokespersons, directors, etc., to echo the concept of the film festival, so that the audience can understand them after participating in the process or reading. Ideas conversely trigger their own speculations, and then discussions with others, forming a cultural public sphere.

中文文獻
王石番（1991）。傳播內容分析法：理論與實證。臺北市：幼獅。
王慈華（2016）。由柏林影展泰迪熊獎探究影展議題型獎項之設立定位及其內涵。廣播與電視，39，75-88。
王麗雅（2006）。文化全球化與全球性文化公共領域。燕山大學學報，7（1），44-46。
台灣國際影音與教育協會（2015）。2015 TIQFF 台灣酷兒影展計畫書【原始數據】。取自：https://www.tiqff.com/sites/web/files/2015tiqff_proposal.pdf
李牧宜（2016年9月15日）。【為愛連結】專訪酷兒影展策展人林志杰：我們都能成為模糊界線的勇敢者，一起為愛連結【線上論壇】。取自https://www.thenewslens.com/feature/tiqff/48934
吳凡（2009）。電影○影展。臺北市：書林。
吳介民、李丁讚（2005）。傳遞共通感受：林合社區公共領域修辭模式的分析。台灣社會學，9，119-163。
林文玲（2012）。人類學學是、影像的展演／介入與公共化策略：民族誌影展在臺灣。文化研究，14，53-100。
林克明（2013）。附加、迷途、非家：影評作為思想的影導。南藝學報，6，37-67。
林秀雲（譯）（2016）。社會科學研究方法（原作者：E. Babbie）。臺北市：雙葉書廊。（原著出版年：1975）
波昂刺刺（2017年10月23日）。酷兒敢曝，群妖出櫃——專訪酷兒影展策展人林杏鴻【線上論壇】。取自https://www.thenewslens.com/article/81494
紀大偉（2015）。翻譯的公共：愛滋，同志，酷兒。台灣文學學報，26，75-112。
翁秀琪（2016）。大眾傳播理論與實證。臺北市：三民。
魚玄阿璣、鄭美里（1997）。〈幸福證在逼近：建立臺灣同性戀社會史的初步嘗試〉。載於紀大偉（主編），酷兒啟示錄：臺灣當代QUEER論述讀本（197-210頁）。臺北市：元尊文化。
陳春富、殷美香，〈「跨國移居者」媒體再現研究：以2007年至2011年台灣主流報紙之新聞報導為觀察〉。《中國傳播學會》，2013年年會論文（2013）。
許智雲（2014）。電影場景中的再現與凝視曖昧──以女同志電影《蝴蝶》、《面子》為例（碩士論文）。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。（系統編號：004915084）。
曹衛東、王曉玨、劉北城、宋偉杰（譯）（2002）。公共領域的結構轉型（原作者：J. Habermas）。臺北市：聯經。（原著出版年：1990）
張錦華（2013）。傳播批判理論：從解構到主體。臺北市：黎明文化。
游美惠（2000）。內容分析、文本分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用。調查研究，8，5-42。
彭家維（2010）。「同志」視覺：從策展看香港同志影展的影像再生產。文化研究月報，103，24-48。
黃啟嘉（2014）。周美玲同志電影分析：以《豔光四色歌舞團》、《刺青》、《漂浪青春》為例（碩士論文）。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。（系統編號：005044834）。
曾慶豹（1998）。哈伯瑪斯。臺北市：生智。
葉月瑜、戴為樂（2011）。東亞電影驚奇：中港日韓【iRead eBook版】。取自http://www.airitibooks.com/detail.aspx?PublicationID=P20110901010
蔡宗翰（2010）。電影劇本《皮克青春》創作論述（碩士論文）。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。（系統編號：004098591）
蔡英文（2002）。政治實踐與公共空間：漢娜‧鄂蘭的政治思想。臺北市：聯經。
劉慧雯（2008）。網際網路公共領域角色的反思：以東海劈腿事件與鴻海打壓新聞自由事件為例。新聞學研究，97，45-81。
戴育賢（2000）。重返公共領域：哈伯瑪斯、女性主義、羅逖、文化研究。新聞學研究，62，119-142。
謝鳳娟（2007）。華與女同志電影中”家的意義”─以《蝴蝶》、《今年夏天》為例。朝陽人文社會學刊，5(2)，1-25。
顧忠華（2004）。〈公共領域的社會基礎〉。載於李丁讚（主編），公共領域在臺灣：困境與契機（147-175頁）。臺北市：桂冠。
英文文獻
Arendt, H.（1958）. The human condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Becker, M. C., Lesage, J. & Rich, B. R. (1995). Lesbian and film. In C. K. Creekmur & A. Doty (Eds.), Out in culture: Gay, lesbian, and queer essays on popular culture (pp. 25-43). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Cook, C. (2018). A content analysis of LGBT representation on broadcast and streaming television. Honors Theses.
Dawson, L. & Loist, S. (2018). Queer/ing film festival: history, theory, impact. Studies in European Cinema, 15(1), 1-24.
Dow, B. (2001). Ellen, television, and the politics of gay and lesbian visibility. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 18, 2: 123-140.
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the Public Sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25(26), 56-80.
Gamson, J. (1996). The organizational shaping of collective identity: the case of Lesbian and Gay Film Festivals in New York. Sociological Forum, 11(2), 231-261.
Gripsrud, J. (1992). The aesthetics and politics of melodrama. In P. Dahlgren and C. Sparks (Ed.), Journalism and popular cultural (pp. 84-95). London, UK: Sage.
Gripsrud, J., Moe, H., Molander, A. & Murdock, G. (2011). The public sphere. Vol. 3: The Cultural Public Sphere. London, England: Sage.
Klippel, H. (2008). The art of programming. In H. Klippel (Ed.), The art of programming: film, program und Kontext (pp. 7-17). Münster, German: LIT.
Kortti, J. (2018). Religion and the cultural public sphere: the case of the Finnish liberal intelligentsia suring the turmoil of the early twentieth century. History of European Ideas, 44(1), 98-112.
Leung, H. H. S. (2015). #Festies notes from the Vancouver Queer Film Festival. Transgender Studies Quarterly, 2(4), 689-694.
Loist, S. (2012). A complicated queerness: LGBT Film Festival and Queer programming strategies. In J. Ruoff (Ed.), Coming soon to a festival near you: programming Film Festival (pp. 157-172). St. Andrews, England: St Andrews Film Books.
Loist, S. (2018). Crossover dreams: global circulation of queer film on the film festival circuits. Diogenes,62(1), 57-72.
McGuigan, J. (1996). Culture and the Public Sphere. New York & London : Routledge.
McGuigan, J. (2005). The cultural public sphere. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 8(4), 427-443.
McGuigan, J. (2010). Cultural analysis. LosAngeles, LA: Sage.
Mennel, B. (2012). New queer cinema: a new aesthetic language. In B. Mennel (Ed.), Queer cinema: schoolgirls, vampires, and gay cowboys (pp. 67-93). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Noy, C.（2017, Apr.）. Moral discourse and argumentation in the public sphere: museums and their visitors. Discourse, Context & Media,16, 39-47.
Raley, A. B. & Lucas J. (2008). Stereotype or success? Journal of Homosexuality, 51, 2: 19-38.
Rich, R. B. (1992). New queer cinema. Sight & Sound, 2(5), 30-35.
Rich, R. B. (2013a). Before the beginning: lineages and preconception. In R. B. Rich (Ed.), New Queer Cinema: A Director’s Cut (pp. 3-15). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Rich, R. B. (2013b). The New Queer Cinema: director’s cut. In R. B. Rich (Ed.), New Queer Cinema: A Director’s Cut (pp. 16-32). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Rich, R. B. (2013c). Collision, catastrophe, celebration: The relationship between gay and lesbian film festival and their publics. In R. B. Rich (Ed.), New Queer Cinema: A Director’s Cut (pp. 33-39). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Rich, R. B. (2013d). A queer and present danger: the death of New Queer Cinema. In R. B. Rich (Ed.), New Queer Cinema: A Director’s Cut (pp. 130-138). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Richards, S. (2016). A New Queer Cinema renaissance. Queer Studies in Media & Popular Culture, 1(2), 215-229.
Riegert, K., Roosvall, A. & Widholm, A. (2015). The political in cultural journalism. Journalism Practice, 9(6), 773-790.
Riegert, K. & Widholm, A. (2019). The difference culture makes: comparing Swedish news and cultural journalism in the 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris. Nordicom Review,40(2), 3-18.
Rhyne, R. (2007). Pink dollars: gay and lesbian film festival and the economy of visibility (Doctoral dissertation). Available from Digital Dissertation Consortium. （UMI No. 3247384）
Staiger, J. (1985). The politics of film canons. Cinema Journal, 24, (3), 4-23.
Taylor, C. (2002). Modern social imaginaries. Public Culture, 14(1), 91-124.
Walters, B. (2012, October 4). New queer cinema: gay experience in all its complexity. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/us
Warner, M. (2002). Publics and Counterpublics. New York, NY: Zone Books.
Wong, C. H. Y. (2011). Film festival: cultural, people, and power on the global screen. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Zielinski, G. (2008). Furtive, steady glances: on the emergence and cultural politics of Lesbian and Gay Film Festivals (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://digitool.library.mcgill.ca/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=32388&local_base=GEN01-MCG02
Zielinski, G. (2009). Queer Film Festivals. In J. C. Hawley & E. S. Nelson (Eds.), LGBTQ America Today: An Encyclopedia (pp. 980–984). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Zielinski, G. & Jusick, S. K. (2010). Ger Zielinski in conversation with Stephen Kent Jusick, executive director of MIX Festival of Queer Experimental Film and Video. Fuse, 16-22.