研究生: |
張智翔 Chih-Hsiang Chang |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
環境工程與環境教育相關研究所學生氣候變遷素養之比較 Comparison of the Climate Change Literacy between the Students of Graduate Institutes of Environmental Engineering and Environmental Education in Taiwan |
指導教授: |
葉欣誠
Yeh, Shin-Cheng |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
環境教育研究所 Graduate Institute of Environmental Education |
論文出版年: | 2014 |
畢業學年度: | 102 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 143 |
中文關鍵詞: | 氣候變遷素養 、現況分析 、環境工程 、環境教育 |
英文關鍵詞: | climate change literacy, current status, environmental engineering, environmental education |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:161 下載:11 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
氣候變遷是人類社會所面臨的嚴酷挑戰之一,也是世界各國高等教育機構的教學與研究重點。大學中的環境相關系所在氣候變遷研究中扮演關鍵的角色,其學生對於氣候變遷的整體素養可視為教育的具體成果。各系所在規劃其課程時,均設定了若干項核心能力,而這些核心能力是否能與氣候變遷素養呼應,則為本研究關切的議題。本研究旨在透過調查瞭解環境工程與環境教育相關研究所學生之氣候變遷素養,檢視其核心能力的設定與氣候變遷素養之間的關係,並瞭解兩類群系所素養表現差異之原因。
本研究透過問卷調查法探討102學年度環境相關系所碩士班學生的氣候變遷素養現況;使用內容分析法、半結構式晤談法瞭解系所核心能力與氣候變遷素養之間的關係及差異產生原因。調查結果顯示,在氣候變遷素養的四項主構面中,環境教育相關研究所學生的「知識」、「態度」與「行動」表現較佳,兩類群研究所學生的「技能」表現並無太大差異;透過皮爾森積差相關分析,發現「態度」為影響其餘三構面之關鍵,而「知識」與「行動」間不具關連性;透過集群分析,可將環境相關系所學生分為:積極行動型、知識標竿型、自我實踐型、知易行難型及消極應付型五大類,環境工程相關研究所中以「知易行難型」人數最多,環境教育相關研究所中人數最多的為「積極行動型」。系所核心能力的規劃,除知識與技能構面外,其餘構面之設定皆與氣候變遷素養調查結果相符。藉由晤談結果可知,氣候變遷素養差異的主要原因為:兩類群研究所特質的不同,兩類群人員分別在氣候變遷研究中扮演「科學家」與「傳播者」的角色。
Climate change is one of the most pressing issues in the world today, and also the emphasis in teaching and research in higher education. Environment-related departments in universities play an important role in both climate change research and the resulting climate change literacy of the students. The concern of this study is on whether the core competencies built for school curriculum were well correlated with climate change literacy. Thus, the objective of this study is to understand the climate change literacy of students through questionnaire surveys, and further examine the relationships between the core competencies and climate change literacy.
A questionnaire was designed as the research tool for measuring and evaluating the climate change literacy of students of two major categories, environmental engineering and environmental education. The results indicate that students in graduate institutes of environmental education perform better than those in graduate institutes of environmental engineering on the aspects of knowledge, attitude, and action; whereas no significant difference can be identified for skill . Cluster analysis was also explored and the students can be categorized into “activeness”, “knowledgeable”, “practical”, “passive”, and “negative”. More students in environmental engineering are “passive”, whereas more students in environmental education are “aggressive”.
Content analysis and semi-structured interviews were then also carried out to examine the relationships between core competencies and climate change literacy, as well as the reasons for the differences between the two groups of students. Students in environmental engineering treat themselves as more like "scientists". On the other hand, students in environmental education play a more active role as "communicators" in climate change.
American College & University Presidents’ Climate Commitment (2011). Text of the American College & University Presidents’ Climate Commitment. Retrieved from: http://www.presidentsclimatecommitment.org/about/commitment
Anderson, A. (2012). Climate change education for mitigation and adaptation. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development 6(2), 191-206. doi: 10.1177/0973408212475199
Bangay, C., & Blum, N. (2010). Education responses to climate change and quality: Two parts of the same agenda? International Journal of Educational Development, 30, 359-368. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.11.011
Beck, A., Sinatra, G. M., & Lombardi, D. (2013). Leveraging Higher-Education Instructors in the Climate Literacy Effort: Factors Related to University Faculty’s Propensity to Teach Climate Change. The International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses, 4(4), 1-17.
Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (2012). Environmental Education for Behaviour Change: Which actions should be targeted? International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1591-1614. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.584079
Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. & Salmerón, L. (2011). Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change. Learning and Instruction, 21(2). doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.002
Ehrlich, P. R., & Ehrlich, A. H. (2013). Can a collapse of global civilization be avoided? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280(1754), 20122845. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2845
Environmental Literacy Council and National Science Teachers Association (2007). Global Climate Change: Resources for Environmental Literacy. Retrieved from: http://www.enviroliteracy.org/nsfmod/ClimateChange.pdf
European Commission (2011). Special Eurobarometer 372 : Climate change. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_372_en.pdf
Gaur, R. C. (2008). Basic Environmental Engineering. Delhi: New Age International.
Harrington, J. (2008). Misconceptions: Barriers to Improved Climate Literacy. Physical Geography, 29(6), 575-584. doi: 10.2747/0272-3646.29.6.575
IPCC (2007). Climate Change 2007 Synthesis Report (AR4). Geneva: Switzerland.
IPCC, Working Group I (2013). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Retrieved from: http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/uploads/WGIAR5_WGI-12Doc2b_FinalDraft_All.pdf
Jacobson, D. L., (2005). The New Core Competence of the Community College. Change, 37(4), 52-61.
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., Rosenthal, S., & Marlon, J. (2014). Climate change in the American mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes in November, 2013. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication.
Lemons, J. (2011). The Urgent Need for Universities to Comprehensively Address Global Climate Change Across Disciplines and Programs. Environmental Management, 48, 379-391. doi: 10.1007/s00267-011-9699-z
Lithner, J., Bergqvist, E., Bergqvist, T., Boesen, J., Palm, T., & Palmberg, B. (2010). Mathematical competencies – A research framework. Paper presented at the mathematics and mathematics education: Cultural and social dimensions. Proceedings of MADIF-7, the seventh mathematics education research seminar, Stockholm.
Luers, A. (2013). Rethinking US climate advocacy. Climatic Change, 120, 13-19. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0797-1
Miléř, T. & Sládek, P. (2011). The climate literacy challenge. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 150-156
Moss, R. H., Edmonds, J. A., Hibbard, K. A., Manning, M. R., Rose, S. K., van Vuuren, D. P., …Wilbanks, T. J. (2010). The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature, 463, 747-756. doi:10.1038/nature08823
NASA (2014, January 23). Global climate change - causes. Retrieved from: http://climate.nasa.gov/causes/
National Environmental Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 5501 (1990)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2009). Climate literacy: Essential principles and fundamental concepts. Retrieved from: http://eo.ucar.edu/asl/archive/docs/Climate_Literacyb8.5x11.pdf
National Weather Service (2014, January 23). JetStream - Online School for Weather. Retrieved from: http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/yos/resource/JetStream/global/climate.htm
Orr, D. W. (1991). What is education for. The Learning Revolution, 27(4), 52.
Owen, R., Fisher, E. & McKenzie, K. (2013). Beyond reduction: climate change adaptation planning for universities and colleges. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 14(2), 146-159. doi: 10.1108/14676371311312860
Oxford University Press (2014, June 13). Oxford Dictionaries Language matters. Retrieved from: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/literacy?q=literacy
Pelham, B. W. (2009). Views on global warming relate to energy efficiency: Relationship exists regardless of national wealth, literacy. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/117835/views-global-warmingrelate-energy-efficiency.aspx
Potter, G (2010). Environmental Education for the 21st Century: Where Do We Go Now? The Journal of Environmental Education, 41(1), 22-33. doi: 10.1080/00958960903209975
Punter, P., Ochando-Pardo, M., & Garcia, J. (2011). Spanish Secondary School Students’ Notions on the Causes and Consequences of Climate Change. International Journal of Science Education, 33(3), 447-464. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.492253
Rea, L. M., & Parker, R. A. (1997). Designing and conducting survey research: A comprehensive guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., …Foley, J. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472-475. doi: 10.1038/461472a
Sharma, A. (2012). Global Climate Change: What has Science Education Got to Do with it? Science & Education, 21(1), 33-53. doi: 10.1007/s11191-011-9372-1
Sonstein, S. A., Seltzer, J., Li, R., Silva, H., Jones, C. T., & Daemen, E. (2014). Moving From Compliance to Competency: A Harmonized Core Competency Framework for the Clinical Research Professional. Journal of Clinical Research Best Practices, 10(6), 1-11.
Stapp, W. B. (1969). The Concept of Environmental Education. Journal of Environmental Education, 1(1), 30-31.
Teksoz, G., Sahin, E., & Tekkaya-Oztekin, C. (2012). Modeling Environmental Literacy of University Students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 157-166. doi: 10.1007/s10956-011-9294-3
U.S. Global Change Research Program (2009). Climate Literacy. The Essential Principles of Climate Science. Retrieved from: http://downloads.globalchange.gov/Literacy/climate_literacy_highres_english.pdf
United Nations (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, UNFCCC. Retrieved from: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf
Vincent, S., & Focht, W. (2009). US higher education environmental program managers’ perspectives on curriculum design and core competencies. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 10(2), 164-183. doi: 10.1108/14676370910945963
王文科、王智弘(2009)。教育研究法。臺北市:五南。
行政院經濟建設委員會(2012)。國家氣候變遷調適政策綱領。臺北市:行政院經濟建設委員會。
余民寧(2002)。教育測驗與評量-成就測驗與教學評量(第二版)。臺北市:心理。
吳清山(2011)。我國高等教育革新的重要課題與未來發展之分析。長庚人為社會學報,4(2),241-280。
吳鈴筑(2010)。國內外環境教育法比較之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
李坤崇(2010)。大學核心能力與能力指標之建構。教育研究月刊,190,107-122。
李宜亭、陳薪雅、葉欣誠、吳季穎、陳建中、陳鶴文(2013年11月)。建置跨學習階段之氣候變遷素養指標及量表。2013年環境教育學術研討會發表之論文,國立臺中教育大學。
沈明來(2009)。資料分析與SPSS應用。臺北市:九州圖書。
周儒、潘淑蘭、吳忠宏(2013)。大學生面對全球暖化議題採取行動之影響因子研究。環境教育研究,10(1),1-34。
林子倫(2008)。台灣氣候變遷政策之論述分析。國立政治大學公共行政學系公共行政學報,28,153-175。
林立潔(2014)。我國電視新聞記者之氣候變遷素養調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
林健三(2012)。環境工程概論。臺北市:鼎茂。
徐美苓(2013)。台灣氣候變遷全國民眾電話調查計畫。財團法人台達電子文教基金會委託計畫成果報告,未出版。
財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會(2011)。「基本素養」與「核心能力」不同嗎。評鑑雙月刊,34,44-45。
教育部(2013年10月12日)。102學年度大學校院一覽表。取自http://ulist.moe.gov.tw/Home/index
教育部(2013年10月12日)。大專校院學科標準分類查詢系統。取自https://stats.moe.gov.tw/bcode/
教育部環境保護小組(2012年5月16日)。氣候變遷調適教育課程教材與學習平臺。取自http://www.climate-edu.tw/
梁世武、劉湘瑤、蔡慧敏、方偉達(2011)。環境教育能力指標暨全民環境素養調查專案工作計畫。環保署委託之專題研究成果報告(編號:EPA-100-EA11-03-A264)。臺北市:行政院環境保護署。
許世璋(2003)。大學環境教育課程對於環境行動與其它環境素養變項之成效分析。科學教育學刊,11(1),97-119。
陳淑敏、宋明娟、甄曉蘭(2010)。大學生專業能力指標之發展-以國立臺灣師範大學為例。高等教育,5(2),61-100。
楊冠政(1993)。環境素養。環境教育季刊,19, 2-14。
楊冠政(1998)。環境教育。臺北市:明文。
楊穎琪(2011)。我國大學生核心能力指標現況調查與建構之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。中原大學,桃園縣。
葉欣誠(2010)。抗暖化關鍵報告:台灣面對暖化新世界的六大核心關鍵。臺北市:新自然主義。
葉欣誠(2012年11月)。環境教育的願景與推動策略。環境科學/工程與環境教育研習工作坊,臺灣電力公司新店烏來訓練所。
葉欣誠、呂文銘、林吳銑、俞佳瑩、陳枋諴、莊育禎、莊慧鈴、曾玉如、游忠豪(2004)。我國防災教育課程發展與規劃之研究。2014年環境教育學術研討會發表之論文,國立高雄師範大學。
葉欣誠、陳建中、陳鶴文、趙慶光(2012)。單一整合型計畫-氣候變遷素養紮根與能源策略人才啟發課程研發計畫:能源教育模型與雲端開放式決策分析模組的交互運用。國家科學委員會委託研究計畫期中報告(編號:NSC101-3113-S-003-002),未出版。
劉金山(2011)。從核心能力觀點論高等教育人才培育革新之策略。教育人力與專業發展雙月刊,28(4),47-56。
劉潔心、邱詩揚、晏涵文、潘瓊如、馮嘉玉、李恆華(2003)。大學校院學生環境素養及其相關因素調查研究。衛生教育學報,19,71-93。
環境教育法(2010年6月5日)。