如何更有效地傳播氣候變遷，是近年來氣候變遷領域中重要的議題。由於氣候變遷是一種較為抽象、複雜的概念，傳播媒體會使用不同的媒材讓民眾更容易理解。圖像作為氣候變遷傳播中的重要媒材，會讓人們對氣候變遷議題產生不同的感受，進而影響民眾展開氣候行動的意願。因此本研究希望能找出圖像有效的氣候變遷傳播策略，以達到促進民眾展開氣候行動的目標。
本研究依照解釋水平理論將氣候變遷圖像區分抽象(Abstract)與具體(Concrete)兩組圖像，再去探討兩種類型的圖像對民眾在心理距離與氣候政策與氣候行動意願的影響。並討論個人認知風格對心理距離的影響，與情緒和議題關心程度兩個氣候行動的重要因子在心理距離到氣候行動間的作用。結果顯示，圖像操控會使民眾在氣候變遷的心理距離上有所差異，但卻不會在氣候政策與行動意願有所差異。圖像類型會影響民眾對氣候變遷的具體或抽象解釋，間接影響民眾對氣候變遷的心理距離。此外，具有全球公民意識與特質同理心的民眾較不受圖像操控的影響。當民眾對氣候變遷的心理距離接近時，會增強不同類型的情緒與對氣候變遷的關心程度。心理距離能透過關心程度、憤怒和希望情緒來增加民眾對氣候政策的支持與氣候行動的意願。與憤怒和希望感相比，恐懼、悲傷與內疚對氣候政策與氣候行動意願的影響效果則較有限，本研究還發現焦慮與羞恥情緒不利於民眾支持氣候政策。

How to effectively communicate climate change has become an important issue in the field in recent years. As climate change is an abstract and complex issue, media outlets use different materials to help people understand it better. Images are an important medium in climate change communication, and they can elicit different feelings and affect people's willingness to take climate action. Therefore, this study aims to find effective image-based climate change communication strategies to encourage people to take climate action.
This study divides climate change images into two groups, Abstract and Concrete images, according to the Construal Level Theory. It explores the effects of these two types of images on people's psychological distance and willingness to take climate policy and action. It also examines how cognitive styles affect the psychological distance and how emotions and concern affect the relationship between psychological distance and climate action. The results show that　manipulating images can affect people's psychological distance but not their willingness to take climate policy and climate action. Images influencing people construal level thinking about climate change and indirectly affect people's psychological distance . In addition, people with global identity and trait empathy are less affected by images manipulation. Psychological distance can indirect intention to support for climate policies and take climate action through emotions of concern, anger, and hope. Compared to emotions of anger and hope, the effects of fear, sadness, and guilt on climate policy and action willingness are limited. This study also found that anxiety and shame are not conducive to support climate policies.

Acharibasam, J. W., & Anuga, S. W. (2018). Psychological distance of climate change and mental health risks assessment of smallholder farmers in Northern Ghana: Is habituation a threat to climate change?. Climate Risk Management, 21, 16-25.
Anderson, A. (2011). Sources, media, and modes of climate change communication: the role of celebrities. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: climate change, 2(4), 535-546.
Beer, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2004). What is unique about self-conscious emotions?. Psychological Inquiry, 15(2), 126-129.
Biao, Z. (2001). Lines and circles, West and East. English Today, 17(3), 3-8.
Born, D. (2019). Bearing witness? Polar bears as icons for climate change communication in National Geographic. Environmental Communication, 13(5), 649-663.
Boykoff, M. T. (2011). Who speaks for the climate?: Making sense of media reporting on climate change. Cambridge University Press.
Breakwell, G. M. (2010). Models of risk construction: some applications to climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(6), 857-870.
Brügger, A. (2020). Understanding the psychological distance of climate change: The limitations of construal level theory and suggestions for alternative theoretical perspectives. Global environmental change, 60, 102023.
Brügger, A., Morton, T. A., & Dessai, S. (2016). “Proximising” climate change reconsidered: A construal level theory perspective. Journal of environmental psychology, 46, 125-142.
Burgoon, E. M., Henderson, M. D., & Markman, A. B. (2013). There are many ways to see the forest for the trees: A tour guide for abstraction. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 501-520.
Chapman, D. A., Corner, A., Webster, R., & Markowitz, E. M. (2016). Climate visuals: A mixed methods investigation of public perceptions of climate images in three countries. Global Environmental Change, 41, 172-182.
Chen, M. F. (2020). Effects of psychological distance perception and psychological factors on pro-environmental behaviors in Taiwan: Application of construal level theory. International Sociology, 35(1), 70-89.
Cho, B., Kwon, U., Gentry, J. W., Jun, S., & Kropp, F. (1999). Cultural values reflected in theme and execution: A comparative study of US and Korean television commercials. Journal of Advertising, 28(4), 59-73.
Choi, I., Koo, M., & Choi, J. A. (2007). Individual differences in analytic versus holistic thinking. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 33(5), 691-705.
Chu, H., & Yang, J. Z. (2018). Taking climate change here and now–mitigating ideological polarization with psychological distance. Global Environmental Change, 53, 174-181.
Chu, H., & Yang, J. Z. (2019). Emotion and the psychological distance of climate change. Science Communication, 41(6), 761-789.
Chu, H., & Yang, J. Z. (2020). Risk or efficacy? How psychological distance influences climate change engagement. Risk Analysis, 40(4), 758-770.
Clayton, S. (2020). Climate anxiety: Psychological responses to climate change. Journal of anxiety disorders, 74, 102263.
CO2 Emissions of All World Countries. (2022). European Commission. https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/report_2022#emissions_table
Comfort, S. E., & Park, Y. E. (2018). On the field of environmental communication: A systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature. Environmental Communication, 12(7), 862-875.
Cox, R. (2013). Environmental communication and the public sphere. Sage.hnsen
Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cook, J., & Lewandowsky, S. (2016). Rational irrationality: Modeling climate change belief polarization using Bayesian networks. Topics in cognitive science, 8(1), 160-179.
Davis, J. I., Gross, J. J., & Ochsner, K. N. (2011). Psychological distance and emotional experience: what you see is what you get. Emotion, 11(2), 438.
Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy.
De Groot, J. I., Steg, L., & Poortinga, W. (2013). Values, perceived risks and benefits, and acceptability of nuclear energy. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 33(2), 307-317.
Dearing, J., & Rogers, E. (1996). Agenda-setting (Vol. 6). Estados Unidos.
Der-Karabetian, A., & Ruiz, Y. (1997). Affective bicultural and global-human identity scales for Mexican-American adolescents. Psychological Reports, 80(3), 1027-1039.
Disappointment, M. (2010). Obama More Popular Abroad Than At Home, Global Image of US Continues to Benefit. Pew Research Center: Pew Global Attitudes Project.
Doherty, T. J., & Clayton, S. (2011). The psychological impacts of global climate change. American Psychologist, 66(4), 265.
Doré, B., Ort, L., Braverman, O., & Ochsner, K. N. (2015). Sadness shifts to anxiety over time and distance from the national tragedy in Newtown, Connecticut. Psychological science, 26(4), 363-373.
Doyle, J. (2007). Picturing the clima (c) tic: Greenpeace and the representational politics of climate change communication. Science as culture, 16(2), 129-150.
Druckman, J. N., & McGrath, M. C. (2019). The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation. Nature Climate Change, 9(2), 111-119.
Duan, R., Takahashi, B., & Zwickle, A. (2019). Abstract or concrete? The effect of climate change images on people’s estimation of egocentric psychological distance. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 828-844.
Duan, R., Takahashi, B., & Zwickle, A. (2021). How effective are concrete and abstract climate change images? The moderating role of construal level in climate change visual communication. Science Communication, 43(3), 358-387.
Duan, R., Zwickle, A., & Takahashi, B. (2017). A construal-level perspective of climate change images in US newspapers. Climatic Change, 142(3), 345-360.
Duan, R., Zwickle, A., & Takahashi, B. (2022). Refining the application of construal level theory: Egocentric and nonegocentric psychological distances in climate change visual communication. Environmental Communication, 16 (1), 92-107.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
European Commission. (2011). Special Eurobarometer 372: climate change.
Feldman, L., & Hart, P. S. (2018). Is there any hope? How climate change news imagery and text influence audience emotions and support for climate mitigation policies. Risk Analysis, 38(3), 585-602.
Ferguson, M. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2010). Collective guilt mediates the effect of beliefs about global warming on willingness to engage in mitigation behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 135-142.
Fesenfeld, L. P., & Rinscheid, A. (2021). Emphasizing urgency of climate change is insufficient to increase policy support. One Earth, 4(3), 411-424.
Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of behavioral decision making, 13(1), 1-17.
Fleury-Bahi, G. (2008). Environmental risk: Perception and target with local versus global evaluation. Psychological Reports, 102(1), 185-193.
Floyd, D. L., Prentice‐Dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (2000). A meta‐analysis of research on protection motivation theory. Journal of applied social psychology, 30(2), 407-429.
Fox, J., McKnight, J., Sun, Y., Maung, D., & Crawfis, R. (2020). Using a serious game to communicate risk and minimize psychological distance regarding environmental pollution. Telematics and Informatics, 46, 101320.
Franco, E. G. (2020, January). The global risks report 2020. In World Economic Forum.
Freitas, A. L., Gollwitzer, P., & Trope, Y. (2004). The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others' self-regulatory efforts. Journal of experimental social psychology, 40(6), 739-752.
Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & Ter Schure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57(2), 212.
Gamson, W. A. (1989). News as framing: Comments on Graber. American Behavioral Scientist, 33,157–166
Geiger, N., Swim, J. K., Gasper, K., Fraser, J., & Flinner, K. (2021). How do I feel when I think about taking action? Hope and boredom, not anxiety and helplessness, predict intentions to take climate action. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 76, 101649.
Gitlin, T. (2003). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left. Univ of California Press.
Haden, V. R., Niles, M. T., Lubell, M., Perlman, J., & Jackson, L. E. (2012). Global and local concerns: what attitudes and beliefs motivate farmers to mitigate and adapt to climate change?. PloS one, 7(12), e52882.
Halperin, A., & Walton, P. (2018). The importance of place in communicating climate change to different facets of the American public. Weather, Climate, and Society, 10(2), 291-305.
Han, D., Duhachek, A., & Agrawal, N. (2014). Emotions shape decisions through construal level: The case of guilt and shame. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4), 1047-1064.
Han, S., Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2007). Feelings and consumer decision making: The appraisal‐tendency framework. Journal of consumer psychology, 17(3), 158-168.
Hansen, A., & Cox, J. R. (Eds.). (2015). The Routledge handbook of environment and communication. London: Routledge.
Hansen, A., & Machin, D. (2013). Researching visual environmental communication. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 7(2), 151-168.
Hart, P. S. (2011). One or many? The influence of episodic and thematic climate change frames on policy preferences and individual behavior change. Science Communication, 33(1), 28-51.
Hart, P. S., & Feldman, L. (2016). The impact of climate change–related imagery and text on public opinion and behavior change. Science Communication, 38(4), 415-441.
Harth, N. S., Leach, C. W., & Kessler, T. (2013). Guilt, anger, and pride about in-group environmental behaviour: Different emotions predict distinct intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 18-26.
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
Hespanha, S. R. (2011). Thematic and affective content in textual and visual communication about climate change: Historical overview of mass media sources and empirical investigation of emotional responses. University of California, Santa Barbara.
Howarth, C., Parsons, L., & Thew, H. (2020). Effectively communicating climate science beyond academia: Harnessing the heterogeneity of climate knowledge. One Earth, 2(4), 320-324.
Ji, L. J., Guo, T., Zhang, Z., & Messervey, D. (2009). Looking into the past: cultural differences in perception and representation of past information. Journal of personality and social psychology, 96(4), 761.
Jones, C., Hine, D. W., & Marks, A. D. (2017). The future is now: Reducing psychological distance to increase public engagement with climate change. Risk Analysis, 37(2), 331-341.
Jones, R. S., & Meakins, J. L. (1997). The future is now. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 185(4), 408-409.
Katz, A., Shealy, T., & Godwin, A. (2020, June). Civil engineering students’ beliefs about the technical and social implications of global warming and when global warming will impact them personally and others. In 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access.
Keller, A., Marsh, J. E., Richardson, B. H., & Ball, L. J. (2022). A systematic review of the psychological distance of climate change: Towards the development of an evidence-based construct. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 101822.
Kim, K., & Ahn, S. J. (2019). The moderating role of cultural background in temporal framing: focusing on climate change awareness advertising. Asian Journal of Communication, 29(4), 363-385.
King, A. J. (2015). Visual messaging and risk communication. Sage handbook of risk communication, 193-205.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Ledgerwood, A., Trope, Y., & Chaiken, S. (2010). Flexibility now, consistency later: psychological distance and construal shape evaluative responding. Journal of personality and social psychology, 99(1), 32.
Lee, H., Deng, X., Unnava, H. R., & Fujita, K. (2014). Monochrome forests and colorful trees: The effect of black-and-white versus color imagery on construal level. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4), 1015-1032.
Lee, Y. K., Chang, C. T., & Chen, P. C. (2017). What sells better in green communications: Fear or hope?: It depends on whether the issue is global or local. Journal of Advertising Research, 57(4), 379-396.
Leiserowitz, A.A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77, 4572
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322(5905), 1201-1205.
Likert, R. (1932). A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55.
Lorenzoni, I., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2006). Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic change, 77(1), 73-95.
Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global environmental change, 17(3-4), 445-459.
Lowe, T., Brown, K., Dessai, S., de França Doria, M., Haynes, K., & Vincent, K. (2006). Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change. Public understanding of science, 15(4), 435-457.
Loy, L. S., & Spence, A. (2020). Reducing, and bridging, the psychological distance of climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 67, 101388.
Maloney, E. K., Lapinski, M. K., & Witte, K. (2011). Fear appeals and persuasion: a review and update of the extended parallel process model. Social and Personality
Manning, C., Mangas, H., Amel, E., Tang, H., Humes, L., Foo, R., ... & Cargos, K. (2018). Psychological distance and response to human versus non-human victims of climate change. Handbook of sustainability and social science research, 143-161.
Manzo, K. (2010). Beyond polar bears? Re‐envisioning climate change. Meteorological applications, 17(2), 196-208.
Markowitz, E., Hodge, C., & Harp, G. (2014). Connecting on climate: a guide to effective climate change communication.
McDonald, R. I., Chai, H. Y., & Newell, B. R. (2015). Personal experience and the ‘psychological distance’of climate change: An integrative review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44 , 109-118.
Meijnders, A. L., Midden, C. J., & Wilke, H. A. (2001). Communications About Environmental Risks and Risk‐Reducing Behavior: The Impact of Fear on Information Processing 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(4), 754-777.
Messaris, P. (1997). Visual persuasion: The role of images in advertising. Sage.
Metag, J., Schäfer, M. S., Füchslin, T., Barsuhn, T., & Kleinen-von Königslöw, K. (2016). Perceptions of climate change imagery: Evoked salience and self-efficacy in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. Science Communication, 38(2), 197-227.
Mildenberger, M., Lubell, M., & Hummel, M. (2019). Personalized risk messaging can reduce climate concerns. Global Environmental Change, 55, 15-24.
Milfont, T. L., Wilson, J., & Diniz, P. (2012). Time perspective and environmental engagement: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 47(5), 325-334
Miller, D. A., Cronin, T., Garcia, A. L., & Branscombe, N. R. (2009). The relative impact of anger and efficacy on collective action is affected by feelings of fear. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(4), 445-462.
Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A., & Atman, C. J. (2002). Risk communication: A mental models approach. Cambridge University Press.
Moser, S. C. (2010). Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(1), 31-53.
Mühlberger, A., Neumann, R., Wieser, M. J., & Pauli, P. (2008). The impact of changes in spatial distance on emotional responses. Emotion, 8(2), 192.
Myers, T. A., Nisbet, M. C., Maibach, E. W., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2012). A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change. Climatic change, 113(3), 1105-1112.
Nilsson, A., von Borgstede, C., & Biel, A. (2004). Willingness to accept climate change strategies: The effect of values and norms. Journal of environmental psychology, 24(3), 267-277.
Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and policy for sustainable development, 51(2), 12-23.
O’Neill, S. & Nicholson-Cole, S. (2009). “Fear won’t do it”: Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 30, 355-379
O’Neill, S. (2020). More than meets the eye: a longitudinal analysis of climate change imagery in the print media. Climatic Change, 163(1), 9-26.
O’neill, S. J. (2013). Image matters: Climate change imagery in US, UK and Australian newspapers. Geoforum, 49, 10-19.
O'Connor, R. E., Bard, R. J., & Fisher, A. (1999). Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk analysis, 19(3), 461-471.
Ojala, M. (2008). Recycling and ambivalence: Quantitative and qualitative analyses of household recycling among young adults. Environment and Behavior, 40(6), 777-797.
Ojala, M. (2012). Hope and climate change: The importance of hope for environmental engagement among young people. Environmental Education Research, 18(5), 625-642.
Olausson, U. (2009). Global warming—global responsibility? Media frames of collective action and scientific certainty. Public understanding of science, 18(4), 421-436.
O'Neill, S. J., & Smith, N. (2014). Climate change and visual imagery. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(1), 73-87.
Pennebaker, J. W., & Harber, K. D. (1993). A social stage model of collective coping: The Loma Prieta earthquake and the Persian Gulf War. Journal of Social issues, 49(4), 125-145.
Prillwitz, J., & Barr, S. (2011). Moving towards sustainability? Mobility styles, attitudes and individual travel behaviour. Journal of transport geography, 19(6), 1590-1600.
Rebich-Hespanha, S., Rice, R. E., Montello, D. R., Retzloff, S., Tien, S., & Hespanha, J. P. (2015). Image themes and frames in US print news stories about climate change. Environmental Communication, 9(4), 491-519.
Reese, G., Proch, J., & Finn, C. (2015). Identification with all humanity: The role of selfdefinition and self-investment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(4), 426–440.https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2102
Reinfried, S., & Tempelmann, S. (2014). The impact of secondary school students' preconceptions on the evolution of their mental models of the greenhouse effect and global warming. International Journal of Science Education, 36(2), 304-333.
Remillard, C. (2011). Picturing environmental risk: The Canadian oil sands and the National Geographic. International Communication Gazette, 73(1-2), 127-143.
Rhead, R., Elliot, M., & Upham, P. (2015). Assessing the structure of UK environmental concern and its association with pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 175-183.
Rickard, L. N., Yang, Z. J., & Schuldt, J. P. (2016). Here and there, then and now: How climate ‘departure dates’ influence climate change engagement. Global Environmental Change, 38, 97-107.
Ripple, W., Wolf, C., Newsome, T., Barnard, P., Moomaw, W., & Grandcolas, P. (2019). World scientists' warning of a climate emergency. BioScience.
Sacchi, S., Riva, P., & Aceto, A. (2016). Myopic about climate change: Cognitive style, psychological distance, and environmentalism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 65, 68-73.
Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2013). Personally relevant climate change: The role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environment and Behavior, 45(1), 60-85.
Schneider, C. R., Zaval, L., & Markowitz, E. M. (2021). Positive emotions and climate change. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences , 42 , 114-120.
Schoenfeld, A. C. (1981). The Environmental Communication Ecosystem: A Situation Report.
Schuldt, J. P., Rickard, L. N., & Yang, Z. J. (2018). Does reduced psychological distance increase climate engagement? On the limits of localizing climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 55, 147-153.
Shanahan, M. (2007). Talking about a revolution: climate change and the media.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychological methods, 7(4), 422.
Slovic, P. (2010). The feeling of risk. New perspectives on risk perception.
Slovic, P. E. (2000). The perception of risk. Earthscan publications.
Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 48(4), 813.
Smith, N. W., & Joffe, H. (2009). Climate change in the British press: The role of the visual. Journal of risk research, 12(5), 647-663.
Spence, A., & Pidgeon, N. (2010). Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 656-667.
Spence, A., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 32(6), 957-972.
Stanley, S. K., Hogg, T. L., Leviston, Z., & Walker, I. (2021). From anger to action: Differential impacts of eco-anxiety, eco-depression, and eco-anger on climate action and wellbeing. The Journal of Climate Change and Health, 1, 100003.
Stoknes, P. E. (2014). Rethinking climate communications and the “psychological climate paradox”. Energy Research & Social Science, 1, 161-170.
Stolarski, M., Fieulaine, N., & Van Beek, W. (Eds.). (2015). Time perspective theory: Review, research and application. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Swim, J. K., & Bloodhart, B. (2015). Portraying the perils to polar bears: The role of empathic and objective perspective-taking toward animals in climate change communication. Environmental Communication, 9(4), 446-468.
Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 58, 345-372.
Tompkins, M. K., Bjälkebring, P., & Peters, E. (2018). Emotional aspects of risk perceptions. In Psychological perspectives on risk and risk analysis (pp. 109-130). Springer, Cham.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological review, 110(3), 403.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463.
Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality.
Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 57(4), 660.
Van der Linden, S. L., Leiserowitz, A. A., Feinberg, G. D., & Maibach, E. W. (2015). The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: Experimental evidence. PloS one, 10(2), e0118489.
Van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., & Leach, C. W. (2010). Experimental evidence for a dual pathway model analysis of coping with the climate crisis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 339-346
Verplanken, B., Marks, E., & Dobromir, A. I. (2020). On the nature of eco-anxiety: How constructive or unconstructive is habitual worry about global warming?. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72, 101528.
Vosniadou, S. (Ed.). (2008). International handbook of research on conceptual change (Vol. 259). New York: Routledge.
Wang, S., Hurlstone, M. J., Leviston, Z., Walker, I., & Lawrence, C. (2021). Construal-level theory and psychological distancing: Implications for grand environmental challenges. One Earth, 4(4), 482-486.
Wang, S., Hurlstone, M. J., Leviston, Z., Walker, I., & Lawrence, C. (2019). Climate change from a distance: An analysis of construal level and psychological distance from climate change. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 230.
Where Does Carbon Dioxide Come From? (2010). Planetnutshell. https://planetnutshell.com/portfolio/where-does-carbon-dioxide-come-from/
Wibeck, V. (2014). Enhancing learning, communication and public engagement about climate change–some lessons from recent literature. Environmental Education Research, 20(3), 387-411.
Wiest, S. L., Raymond, L., & Clawson, R. A. (2015). Framing, partisan predispositions, and public opinion on climate change. Global environmental change, 31, 187-198.
Wolburg, J. M. (2001). Preserving the moment, commodifying time, and improving upon the past: Insights into the depiction of time in American advertising. Journal of Communication, 51(4), 696-719.
Yang, J. Z., & Chu, H. (2018). Who is afraid of the Ebola outbreak? The influence of discrete emotions on risk perception. Journal of Risk Research, 21(7), 834-853.
Yang, J. Z., Rickard, L. N., Liu, Z., & Boze, T. (2021). Too Close to Care? A Replication Study to Re-examine the Effect of Cued Distance on Climate Change Engagement. Environmental Communication, 15(1), 1-11.
Yang, Z. J., Seo, M., Rickard, L. N., & Harrison, T. M. (2015). Information sufficiency and attribution of responsibility: Predicting support for climate change policy and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Risk Research, 18(6), 727-746.
Yzerbyt, V., Dumont, M., Wigboldus, D., & Gordijn, E. (2003). I feel for us: The impact of categorization and identification on emotions and action tendencies. British journal of social psychology, 42(4), 533-549.
Zillmann, D. (2002). Exemplification theory of media influence. Media effects: Advances in theory and research, 2, 19-41.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2015). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. In Time perspective theory; review, research and application (pp. 17-55). Springer, Cham.
〈時評〉大旱透露台灣需檢討水資源政策. (2021). 台灣英文新聞. https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/ch/news/4149695
691期 再生能源發電預測 解讀風與光. (2020). 台電月刊. https://tpcjournal.taipower.com.tw/article/4029
73年來最熱單月 7月均溫30.2度創紀錄. (2020). 自由時報. https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/3247011
發燒/全球暖化. (n.d.). 新北i 搶救地球大作戰. https://www.epd.ntpc.gov.tw/epd_kid/page.html
方偉達（2018）。人文社科研究方法：藝術、人文與社會學科，研究生完全達陣祕技。頁190-194。
翟治平, & 王韋堯（2009）。廣告圖像中對比形式設計之探討. 設計學報 (Journal of Design), 14(1).
颱風暴雨熱浪　如何避免戰爭與末日？. (2021). 天下雜誌. https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5117636
國家發展委員會（2022）。臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明。
抗旱一起來. (2021). 中央社新聞粉絲團. https://www.facebook.com/cnanewstaiwan/photos/a.187493897942765/5883856621639769/?type=3&paipv=0&eav=AfYIqaDlwq9VmqOl0aku8SPPlACppfmNqq7YL7XyfRI9awz1BbXEiRo6exQARDK4K4c&_rdr
快新聞圖輯／台北陷入汪洋！ 信義、松山變成漂漂河　交通停擺. (2021). 民視新聞網. https://www.ftvnews.com.tw/news/detail/2021604W0178
邱皓政. (2019). 量化研究與統計分析: SPSS 與 R 資料分析範例解析. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
徐美苓, & 施琮仁. (2015). 氣候變遷相關政策民意支持的多元面貌. 中華傳播學刊.
史麗珠、鍾佳玘、趙國玉、林雪蓉、侯嘉玲、林慧芬(2015)。注意力不足過動症知識量表之發展及信效度評估。台灣公共衛生雜誌，34(3)，319-334。
葉欣誠主持（2018）。氣候變遷傳播中認知理性領域和情意感性領域之相互作用研究：從海平面上升、北極熊到世界末日」(MOST 105-2511-S-003-011-MY2) 科技部，人文與社會科學簡訊。
姚開屏 (1996). 從心理計量的觀點看測量工具的發展. 職能治療學會雜誌, 14(1), v-xxi.
楊意菁、徐美苓（2010）。〈風險社會概念下的風險溝通與網路傳播：以全球暖化議題為例〉，《中華傳播學刊》，18卷，頁151-191。
王俊明. (1999). 問卷與量表的編製及分析方法. 體育測驗與評價 (頁 139-158). 臺北市: 中華民國體育學會.
王文科, & 王智弘. (2020). 教育研究法. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.