研究生: |
張哲綸 Chang che-lun |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
尺度政治下的都市治理──以2012南韓麗水世博會為例 Urban governance of the“the political of scale” : the case study of the 2012 Sounth Korea Yeosu World EXPO |
指導教授: |
王文誠
Wang, Wen-Cheng |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
地理學系 Department of Geography |
論文出版年: | 2014 |
畢業學年度: | 102 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 107 |
中文關鍵詞: | 都市治理_ 、世界博覽會 、尺度政治 、多元尺度治理 、麗水 |
英文關鍵詞: | urban governace, World EXPO, potical of scale, multi-scalar governance, Yeosu city |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:185 下載:18 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
尺度是地理學的重要概念,也是國家在面臨長期的資本積累問題,所採取的手段,尺度的政治透過尺度向上移轉及尺度的下放等方式:向上尋求較大的尺度,全球尺度下透過申辦世界博覽會等大型活動,解決國內積累過度的問題;尺度下放,透過地方自治的實施,南韓的地方政府開始動員,從過去由上而下的管理(government)朝向由下而上的治理(governance),治理的轉型帶動南韓西南區域的再發展,解決長久以來區發展不均的問題。
南韓政府透過世界博覽會的舉辦,驅動全羅南道區域的發展,並且提出另類的世界博覽會論述──「小城市也能舉辦世博會」。將麗水自治市推向國際舞台,將世界博覽會作為城市發展的萬靈丹。在其申辦過程中,治理模式的轉變,不再以國家管理主義的方式,地方政府與私人企業開始加入治理結構中,治理模式形成一個多元的尺度,映證南韓的多元尺度治理的說法。最後,南韓國家的權力在多元尺度治理下,其權力看似弱化,但國家的影響程度是更廣泛的,因此在這樣的討論下,多元尺度的治理並不削弱國家機器的權力,反而是透過尺度的移轉,更加權力正當化賦予國家機器。
Scale is an important concept in geography, it’s also the capital accumulation problems that the country faced and it’s the solutions. The politics of scale through Scaling up and Scaling down : to find out the bigger scale, e.g. applied the world EXPO or the mega event et.al. The scaling down through the Local gonvernance implement, the Sounth Korea local governance began to operate from the up-to-down governance mode to the down-to-up governance mode, the gonvernance shift took the Sounth Korea East Sounth region redeveloped, to slove the long time region undevelopment problem.
The Sounth Korea government through the World EXPO hosted, driving the Jeollanam-do development and proposed the alternative World EXPO discourse- small city can also host the World EXPO. To push the Yeosu city to the International stage and the World EXPO can solve the city problem’s solutions. In the applied process, the gonvernance mode shift was not controled by national government, the local government and Private Enterprisebegan to join the governance structure. The governance became a multi-scalar, reflected the multi-scalar governance discourse in Sounth Korea. Finally, the Sounth Korea country power looks weaken in the multi-scalar govenance, but the national influence is wider. In the context, the multi-scalar governance is not dent the natonal machine power, instead of the scale shift to justify the power to be put the central governance.
參考文獻
AIPH. (2013). Exhibitions, actual programme. from http://www.aiph.org/site/index_en.cfm?act=teksten.tonen&parent=4683&varpag=6339
BIE. (1928). Introduction to Expos. Paris Convention. 2012
BIE. (2013). World Expo. 2013, from http://www.bie-paris.org/site/en/expos/world-expos.html
Brenner, Neil. (1999). Globalisation as reterriorialisation: the rescaling of urban governance in Euroean Union. Urban studies, 36(3), 431-452.
Brenner, Neil. (2004). Urban Governance and the Production of New Spaces in Western Europe. Review of International Political Economy, 11(3), 447-488.
Brenner, Neil. (2009). Open questions on state rescaling. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2(1), 123-139.
Castells, Manuel. (1991). The informational city : information technology, economic restructuring, and the urban-regional process.
Connolly, William E. (1996). Suffering, justice, and the politics of becoming. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 20(3), 251-277.
Crang, Mike. (2005). Culture geography: Routledge.
Dae-jung, Kim. (2000). Nobel Lecture. Retrieved 5/20, 2013, from http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2000/dae-jung-lecture.html
Dyberg, T. B. (1997). The circular structure of power. London: Verso.
Expo, 2012 Yeosu. (2011). Expo 2012 Overview. Committee of 2012 Yeosu Expo. 2012, from http://www.expo2012.kr/main.html
EXPO, Gyeongju Culture. (2012). 엑스포소개. from http://www.cultureexpo.or.kr/open.content/ko/expo/review/2011/overview/
EXPO, The committee of Yeosu World. (2012). Intrduction of Committee. Retrieved 5/, 2013
Friedman, J. (1986). The world city hypothesis. Development an d Change, 17, 69-83.
Getz, Donald. (1997). Event management & event tourism. New York: Cognizant Communication Corp.
Giddens, Anthony. (1984). Polity Press (Polity Press ed.). Cambridge United Kingdom.
Hajer, Maarten A. (1995). The Politics of Environmental Discourse Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford.
Harvey, David. (1989). From mamagerialism to Entrepreneurialiam: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capialism. Geografiska Annaler B, 71.
Harvey, David. (2003). The new imperialism. England: socio publishing.
Harvey, David. (2008). Constructing the “Right to the City” in Brazil. Social and Legal Studies, 16(2), 201-209.
Horne, John D., & Manzenreiter, Wolfram. (2009). Accounting for Mega-Events
Forecast and Actual Impacts of the 2002 Football World Cup Finals on the Host Countries Japan/Korea. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 44, 5-22.
IFEA. (2012). 2012 World Festival & Event City Award Program. IFEA. from http://www.ifea.com/joomla1_5/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=229&Itemid=429
Jeong, Gang-Hoan, & Faulkner, Bill. (1996). Resident Perceptions of Mega-Event Impacts: The Taejon International Exposition Case. Festival Management and Event Tourism, 4, 3-11.
Kim, Kwang Sik. (2011). Exploring transportation planning issues during the preparations for EXPO 2012 Yeosu Korea. Habitat International, 35(2), 286-294. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.10.002
Lamberti, Lucio, Noci, Giuliano, Guo, Jurong, & Zhu, Shichang. (2011). Mega-events as drivers of community participation in developing countries: The case of Shanghai World Expo. Tourism Management, 32(6), 1474-1483. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2010.12.008
Lee, Chong-Ki, & Taylor, Tracy. (2005). Critical reflections on the economic impact assessment of a mega-event: the case of 2002 FIFA World Cup. Tourism management, 26(4), 595-603.
Lee, Yong Sook (2009). Blanced development in global regional development? Unpacking the new regional policy if South Korea. Regional Studies, 43(3), 353-367.
Macleod, Gordon, & Jones, Martin. (2007). Territorial, Scalar, Networked, Connected: In What Sense a ‘Regional World’? Regional Studies, 41(9), 1177-1191. doi: 10.1080/00343400701646182
Martinez, Elizabeth, & Garcia, Arnoldo. (2000). What is Neoliberalism? Retrieved 5/20, 2012, from http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=376
Mawson, J. (1997). Regional policy in the Republic of Korea. Regional Studies, 31(4), 417-423. doi: 10.1080/713693342
National Statistical Office, NSO. (2012). Korean Statistical Korea e book. Korea: Retrieved from http://kostat.go.kr/portal/english/index.action.
Park, B.G. (2003). Territorialized party politics and the politics of local economic development: State-led industrializtion and political regionalism in South Korea. Political Geography, 22(8), 811-839.
Patsy ,Healey. (2003). Collaborative Planning in Perspective. Planning Theory, 2(2), 101-123. doi: 10.1177/14730952030022002
Pasty, Healy. (2006). Transforming Governance Challenges of Institutional Adaptation and a New Politics of Space. European Planning Studies, 14,No.3.
Rail, KO. (2012). Introduction about KoRail. Retrieved 5/20, 2013, from http://info.korail.com/2007/eng/eng_index.jsp
Roche, Maurice. (2000). Mega-events and Modernity: Olympics and Expos in the Growth of Global Culture. New Yok.
Sassen, Saskia. (2001). The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. NJ: Princeton University Press.
Scott, Allen J. (2001). Global City-regions: Trends, Theory, Policy. USA: Oxford University Press.
Swyngedouw, Erik. (1997). Neither Global nor Local: ‘Glocalization’ and the Politics of ScaleSpaces of globalization, reasserting the power of the local. (pp. 137-166). New York: The Guilford Press.
Swyngedouw, Erik. (2004). Globalisation or 'glocalisation'? Networks, territories and rescaling. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17(1), 25-48. doi: 10.1080/0955757042000203632
UN-HABITAT. (2012). urban governance. from http://www.unhabitat.org/categories.asp?catid=260
Wagenaar, H., & Hajer, Maarten A. (2003). Place, identity and local politics: Analysing partnership initiatives Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society (pp. 60-87). Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
上海世界博覽會. (2010). 2010上海世博會概況. 上海世博委員會. 2012, from http://www.expo2010.cn/
孔鍾植. (2005). 政府將在麗水建立海洋度假特區, 東亞日報. Retrieved from http://chinese.donga.com/big/srv/service.php3?biid=2005020388678
文茜世界周報, Ctitv (Producer). (2012, 8/12). /韓國麗水世博 國際館最美麗的風景 Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAprMQdL2Ds
毛石磊. (2007). 韓國工業區之開發與規劃. 工業區開發管理通報季刊(4).
王文誠. (2011). 邁向全球暨都市治理?台灣新五都不均地理考察. 中國地理學會會刊, 46.
王振寰. (2007). 空間再尺度化的角力:全球化下的臺灣資通訊產業與國家機器. 地理學報, 49, 1-16.
央视网. (2012). [领导者]李明博:丽水世博会以海洋 环保为主题 希望更多中国游客参与. Retrieved 5/20, 2013, from http://jingji.cntv.cn/2012/05/12/VIDE1336799295665914.shtml
吉見俊哉. (2010). 博覽會的政治學-視線之現代. 台北市: 群學.
安惠利. (2009). 一萬名新生兒的經濟效果與舉辦麗水博覽會旗鼓相當. Retrieved from http://chinese.joins.com/big5/article.do?method=detail&art_id=36170&category=002002
吳炫燮. (2010). :從"競爭對手"到"親密伙伴". Retrieved 5/20, 2013, from http://sh.people.com.cn/BIG5/134952/185686/185705/185732/11289760.html
呂韶理. (2005). 展示臺灣:權力空間與殖民統治的形象表述. 台北市: 麥田.
李小建. (2006). 經濟地理學. 北京: 高等教育出版社.
李永展, 藍逸之, & 莊翰華. (2005). 全球經濟變遷發展型國家與台灣城鄉規劃之重探:都市企業主義適用性的地理探查及其治理危機. 地理學報, 40.
李裕欽. (2012). 速成政治的都市治理:以2010台北國際花卉博覽會為例. (碩士), 國立台北大學, 台北.
周志龍. (2003). <後工業台北多核心的空間結構化及其治理政治學.pdf>. 地理學報, 34, 1-18.
周原. (2012). 韓國麗水世博 要人海共榮. 天下雜誌, 495.
東亞日報. (2006). 全球城市生活質量排名首爾列第89位. Retrieved 5/20, 2013, from http://chinese.donga.com/big/srv/service.php3?biid=2006041142458
林子新. (2011). 找回尺度的階序結構:邁向空間的意識形態政治. 地理學報, 62, 19-48.
金成鉉. (2007). 麗水世博會經濟價值達14萬億超過世界盃, 朝鮮日報. Retrieved from http://cn.chosun.com/big5/site/data/html_dir/2007/11/28/20071128000014.html
金映勛. (2008). 韓國國土部發布海岸開發藍圖
東海岸-能源,西海岸-物流,南海岸-旅游產業特色化, 中央日報. Retrieved from http://chinese.joins.com/big5/article.do?method=detail&art_id=12848&category=002002
孫若怡. (2010). 歷史上的世界博覽會. 海峽評論, 234.
徐吉志, & 周蕙蘋. (2006). 都市治理之基本意含與發展 都市及區域治理 (pp. 3-43). 台北市.
高浩榮. (2002). 金大中出面強調一定要成功申辦2010年世博會, 人民日報. Retrieved from http://www.people.com.cn/BIG5/guoji/22/82/20020324/693856.html
梁嘉桓. (2010). 629民主化宣言. Retrieved 5/20, 2013, from http://www.digitimes.com.tw/tw/dt/n/shwnws.asp?CnlID=10&Cat=&Cat1=&id=207784
郭恩慈. (2011). 東亞城市空間生產-探索東京、上海、香港的城市文化. 台北.
黃振家. (2010). 從全球競爭看世界博覽會的經濟與商機 生活者研究所 (Vol. 2012).
愛知世博組織委員會. (2005). 2005日本博覽會總概要. from http://www.expo2005.or.jp/tcn/
鄭元洙. (2009). 馬山、昌原、鎮海的合併效益,10年7722億韓元, 東亞日報. Retrieved from http://chinese.donga.com/big/srv/service.php3?biid=2009100875308
瞿文芳. (2002). 南韓經驗~世足賽對台灣的啟示. from http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/EC/091/EC-C-091-096.htm
簡博秀. (2002). 全球化、全球城市和中國都市發展策略. 台灣社會研究季刊, 47(3), 141-194.
藍逸之, & 李承嘉. (2009). 臺北市企業型都市治理在空間政治角力過程中的制度危機-一個尺度的政治經濟分析. 建築與規劃學報, 10(2), 123-146.
이진녕. ( 2007 ). [點評]韓國將合併麗水、順川、光陽三個城市 Retrieved 5/20,