「E世代來臨，體育新思維」資訊科技融入教學蔚為潮流，亦是臺灣重要的教育政策。在近年來又以擴增實境 (Augmented Reality, AR) 做為行動學習之趨勢，廣泛的運用在各學科上，而擴增實境可產生一種逼真的體驗，不但能提升教學的效果，對於學生的學習也具吸引力，亦有助於提升學生學習的專注力和學習動機。本研究目的在了解互惠式教學的有效性是否能藉由現在行動學習的協助而予以發揮，降低限制，提升學習動機與學習成效。方法:本研究採準實驗設計，以台北市某兩所國中各兩個班級（共四班學生）為研究參與者，兩班為對照組 (互惠式體育教學)，另兩班為實驗組 (擴增實境增強互惠式體育教學)。研究進行5堂課共250分鐘(5節*50分鐘) 之互惠式籃球教學，以ARCS動機量表、動作技能評分表、平板裝置、攝影機為研究工具，並以描述統計、相依樣本t考驗、獨立樣本t考驗及二因子變異數分析進行資料處理，顯著水準α=.05。結果:一、擴增實境增強互惠式體育教學對於國中生籃球學習動機有顯著提升，特別在專注力自信心及滿足感。二、擴增實境增強互惠式體育教學對於國中生籃球上籃之動作技能有顯著提升。三、擴增實境增強互惠式體育教學對於國中男女生無影響。建議:一、課程當中可以適度給予學生學習之相關知識與生活上之連結，使學生更能了解其學習之重要性與更能貼近其生活。二、增加及設定不同目標及挑戰。三、未來能將擴增實境應用在不同項目上。

Mobile technology has a great potential to change the physical education teaching practice. Moreover, information literacy has also been encouraged in the latest new curriculum guideline in Taiwan. Augmented Reality (AR) is one of approaches of mobile learning that allows to produce a realistic and attractive experience for students. However, some studies indicated that students had difficulties to translate the teacher-prepared criteria (checklist) while implementing Mosston's reciprocal style of teaching. The question then arises as to the possibility to integrate AR mobile technology into the existing teaching style in physical education. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of the integration of the AR mobile learning into reciprocity teaching in terms of students’ learning outcome. The quasi-experimental design method was adopted. 100 junior high school students (grade 7) participated the study. They were divided, according to their classes, into experimental group (EG, mobile learning integrated) and control group (CG, reciprocal style with checklist). 5 lessons (5*50 minutes) of basketball were implemented in both EG and CG. ARCS motivation scale and skills (free throw and lay-up) assessment were conducted before and after the lessons. The data were collected majorly from these two resources and also analyzed through statistical test (α = .05). Results: (1) the students’ learning motivation were increased in both EG and CG, however, attention, self-confidence and satisfaction were significantly increased in EG; (2) there was significant difference between EG and CG in terms of lay-up skills performance; (3) Augmented reality enhanced reciprocal style physical education has no significant interaction with boys and girls in the country. In conclusion, the integration of mobile learning into reciprocal style of teaching increased the students’ learning motivation in terms of concentration, self-confidence, satisfaction. It implies that the integration of mobile learning into PE teaching can be an effective alternative way to assist student’s learning. Future directions are provided.

米芳純 (2011)。擴增實境應用於國中教學之研究－以自然與生活科技領域為例。國立臺東大學美術產業碩士學位在職進修專班，碩士論文。
托月娥（2008）。互惠式排球教學法對輕度智能障礙學生人際關係之影響。未出版碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
李興隆（2010）。命令式與互惠式運用於籃球教學效果之研究。海峽兩岸體育研就學報，4（1），15-24。
吳明隆（2011）。以數位化行動學習迎接新挑戰。T&D飛訊季刊，124，1-21。
沈中偉 (2004)。科技與學習理論與實務。臺北市：心理學出版社。
周宏室（2005）。Mosston（摩斯登）體育教學光譜的理論與應用（四版）。臺北市：師大書苑。
林伯杰（2008）。擴增實境應用於教學之研究-以國小英語為例，未出版碩士論文，國立彰化師範大學數位內容科技與管理研究所。
林勝賢、張承憲、陳宗禧 (2009)。探討擴增實境融入行動學習對國小學生自然與生活科技學習動機與學習成就的影響。國立臺南大學數位學習科技學系碩士班，碩士論文，未出版。
林建志 (2014)。練習式與互惠式教學對國小學童籃球運球急停投籃學習效果之研究，為出版碩士論文，臺北市立大學，臺北市。
邱美虹、唐尉天（2014）：在擴增實境中探索科學。科學月刊，539期，P850-853。
高志強（2003）。摩斯登教學光譜中命令式、練習式、互惠式教學果之比較分析。未出版碩士論文，臺北市立體育學院，臺北市。
倪偉城（2010）。以擴增實境技術融入國小低年級注意力訓練課程之研究。 (出版論文) 淡江大學，臺北市。
教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。http://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-7944,c639-1.php?Lang=zh-tw
陳文榮（2002）。Mosston教學光譜應用於羽球教學之探討－以臺南市國小資源班為例。未出版碩士論文，國立體育學院，臺北市。
陳奕樺、楊雅婷（2016）。臺灣國小行動學習計畫的學生自評學習效益影響因素探討。教育科學研究期刊，61(3)，99-129。
陳垣翰（2006）。Mosston命令式、練習式和互惠式教學在國小巧固球教學效果之比較研究。未出版碩士論文，國立臺東大學，臺東縣。
陳志銘、蔡雁農 (2013)。互動式擴增實境系統支援國小圖書館利用教育。臺北市立圖書館館訊30卷3期，39-49。
陳慶帆、簡崇霖 (2017)。KP加影像回饋對於桌球動作技能表現之影響。文化體育學刊，25，1-10。
張佑昆 (2001)。電腦多媒體CAI在體育教學上之應用。屏東體育，5，119-135。
張學望、邱柏升、陳宗禧、黃悅民（2010）。擴增實境融入行動學習環境中學習者行為意向之研究。論文發表於國立臺南大學舉辦之「TANET2010臺灣網際網路」研討會，臺南市。
許于仁、黃一倚 (2017)。探討擴增實境式行動學習在博物館導覽中對學習風格與學習成效之影響。臺灣教育評論月刊，2017，6（1），頁202-222。
莊順凱（2006）。以概念圖法建構擴增實境教育系統。(未出版碩士論文)。國立成功大學，臺南市。
游志弘（2009）。應用增廣實境技術輔助國小戶外教學。(未出版碩士論文) 國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
黃清雲 (1992)。整合學習理論與影碟高科技在體育教學上的應用。中華體育，6(3),53-58。
黃孟毅 (2008)。增強實境應用在國中生態系單元之質化研究-考量小組競爭與活動量。 (未出版碩士論文)。私立銘傳大學，臺北市。
黃梓銓 (2008)。擴增實境應用於英語名詞、動詞及形容詞教學之研究。(未出版碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。
黃國禎（2012）。行動與無所不在學習的發展與應用。T&D飛訊季刊，141，52-61。
黃俊傑、康正男、董惠美、王傑賢(2007)。Mosston's命令式、練習式、互惠式教學形式對壘球擲準學習效果之比較研究。運動教練科學 (9)，197-206。
葉菁華（2008）。Mosston命令式和互惠式教學在國小體操教學效果之比較研究。未出版碩士論文，國立臺東大學，臺東縣。
楊進益（2001）。Mosston命令式、練習式、互惠式教學形式對高職學生排球低手發球教學效果之比較研究。(未出版碩士論文)。國立體育學院，桃園縣。
劉德山（2008）。練習式教學法與互惠式教學法對高職輕度智能障礙者高爾夫球與壘球動作技能學習成效之研究比較。(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
劉秀慧(2001)。不同教學形式融入多球練習法在網球教學上的運用。大專體育，56，9-17。
賴阿福（2014）。行動學習的教學方式與省思。教師天地，193，19-26。
蕭秋明、周建智、李光武、陳嘉弘、林惠美 (2004)。探討高中學生之學習環境和目標取向在學生體育課學習滿足感與體適能認知之影響。北體學報，11，159-172。
蘇俊欽（2004）。擴增實境應用於中文注音符號學習之研究。(未出版碩士論文)。國立成功大學，臺南市。
蘇育呈 (2010)。Mosston互惠式與包含式教學在國小扯鈴學習效果之比較研究。碩士論文。國立臺東大學，臺東縣。
維基百科，擴增實境的意義。上網日期：2017年11月03日。取自於：http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E6%93%B4%E5%A2%9E%E5%AF%A6%E5%A2%83
Azuma, R. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-385.
Pitsi, A., Digeldis, N., & Papaioannou, A. (2015). The effects of reciprocal and self–check teaching styles in students’ intrinsi–extrinsic motivation, enjoyment and autonomy in teaching traditional Greek dances. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 15(2), 352 - 361.
Byra, M. (2006). Teaching styles and inclusive pedagogies. In D. Kirk, D. Macdonald, & M. O’Sullivan (Eds.), The Handbook of Research in Physical Education (pp. 449–466). London: Sage.
Freitas, R., & Campos, P. (2008). SMART: A SysteM of Augmented Reality for Teaching 2nd Grade Students. The Author 2008. Published by the British Computer Society.
Goldberger, M. (1992). The spectrum of teaching styles: Perspective for research on teaching physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 63, 42-46.
Hennings, J., Wallhead, T., & Byra, M. (2010) A Didactic analysis of student content learning during the reciprocal style of teaching. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29, 227-244.
Hutchinson, G. E., & Mercier, R. (2004). Using Social Psychological Concepts to Help Students. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 75(7), 22-26.
Kynäslahti, H. (2003). In search of elements of mobility in the context of education. In Mobile learning (eds. H. Kynaslahti & P. Seppala) pp. 41–48. IT Press, Helsinki.
Keller, J. M. (1987a). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10
Keller, J. M. (1987b). The systematic process of motivational design. Performance and Instruction, 26(9), 1-8.
Keller, J. M. (1996). Motivational design and multimedia: Beyond the novelty effect. Paper presented at the International Symposium on New Technologies of Instruction 1996, Taipei, Taiwan.
Keller, J. M. (1999). Motivation by design. Unpublished manuscript Tallahassee, FL, Florida State University.
Rink, J. E. (1998). Teaching physical education for learning. Louis: Time Mirror/MosbyCollege Publish.
Mosston, M., & Ashworth, S. (1994). Teaching Physucal Educatio (4th ed). NY: Macmillan College Publishing Company.
Milgram, P., & Kishino, A. F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. ÆICE Transactions on Information and Systems, 77(12),1321-1329
Mosston, M., & Ashworth, S. (2008). Teaching physical education (1st online ed.). Retrieved2ndApril,2017from http://www.spectrumofteachingstyles.org/pdfs/ebook/Teaching_Physical_Edu_1st_Online_old.pdf
Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, S., & Kishino, F. (1994). Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. Proc. SPIE Conf. Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies,, vol.2351-34, pp.282-292; doi: 10.1117/12.197321
Ozdamli, F., & Cavus, N. (2011). Basic elements and characteristics of mobile learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 937-942.
Ozdamli, F., & Uzunboylu, H. (2015). M-learning adequacy and perceptions of students and teachers in secondary schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 159-172.
Petri, H. L. (1986). Motivation: Theory and Research. Belmont, California: Wad sworth Publishing Company.
Iserbyt, P., Madou, B., Vergauwen, L., & Behets, D. (2011). Instructional guidance in reciprocal peer tutoring with task cards. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29, 38-53.
Iserbyt, P., Madou, B., Vergauwen, L., & Behets, D. (2011). Effects of peer mediated instruction with task cards on motor skill acquisition in tennis. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30, 31-50.
Sumadio, D. D., & Rambli, D. R. A. (2010). Preliminary evaluation on user acceptance of the augmented reality use for education. In The second international conference on computer engineering and applications (pp. 461–465).[IEEE]doi:10.1109/ ICCEA.2010.239
Shunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and Academic Motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-231.
Simon, J., Dewitte, S., & Lens, W. (2003). ’’Don’t Do It for Me. Do It for Yourself ’’ Stressing the personal Relevance enhances motivation in physical education. Journal of Sport & Psychology, 25(2), 145-160.
Theodosiou, A., Gerani, C., Barkoukis, V., Gioupsani, A., Papacharisis, V., Drakou, A., & Tsorbatzoudis, H. (2010). Self-check and reciprocal teaching styles in physical education: A qualitative investigation of elementary school students’ experiences. III Jornadas Iberoamericanas de Innovación Educativa en el ámbito de las TIC. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria 17-18 de noviembre de 2016.
Vinu, P. V., Sherimon, P. C., & Krishman, R. (2011). Towards pervasive mobile learning－The vision of 21st century. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3067-3073.
Wulf, G., Hob, M., & Prinz, W. (1998). Instructions for motor learning: Differential effects of internal versus external focus of attention. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30(2), 169-179.