Author: |
宋啟辰 Sung, Chi–Chen |
---|---|
Thesis Title: |
關鍵人才培訓結合雙生涯發展對組織認同、角色認同與工作績效之關聯性研究—以全家便利商店為例 The Study of Relationship Between Key Talent Training Incorporating Dual–Career Development and Organizational Identification, Role Identification and Work Performance– FamilyMart as an Example |
Advisor: |
黃能堂
Huang, Neng-Tang |
Committee: |
張文龍
Zhang, Wen–Long 侯世光 Hou, Shi–Guang |
Approval Date: | 2021/07/20 |
Degree: |
碩士 Master |
Department: |
科技應用與人力資源發展學系人力資源發展碩士在職專班 Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development_Continuing Education Master's Program of Human Resource Development |
Thesis Publication Year: | 2021 |
Academic Year: | 109 |
Language: | 中文 |
Number of pages: | 213 |
Keywords (in Chinese): | 任務性績效 、情境績效 、雙生涯發展路徑 、組織認同 、角色認同 |
Keywords (in English): | mission–based performance, scenario performance, dual career development path, organization identification, role identification |
Research Methods: | 個案研究法 、 深度訪談法 、 內容分析法 、 半結構式訪談法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202101198 |
Thesis Type: | Academic thesis/ dissertation |
Reference times: | Clicks: 202 Downloads: 0 |
Share: |
School Collection Retrieve National Library Collection Retrieve Error Report |
人才是企業長期競爭力的關鍵因素,個案公司為建立具備專業深度的競爭優勢,長期計畫性培養未來策略發展領域的關鍵人才,並因應關鍵人才在組織內的生涯發展,建構雙軌晉升的雙生涯路徑。本研究旨在探討該公司關鍵人才培育制度對於工作績效、組織認同與角色認同的影響,以個案公司所遴選出的關鍵人才作為研究對象,並追蹤各領域關鍵人才於訓練前、訓練期間及訓練後的任務性績效數據作為分析資料。有關訓練成效與任務性績效的因果關係驗證,採單一個案研究法的平行跨參與者及平行跨條件的多基線設計,至於關鍵人才培訓結合雙生涯發展對情境績效、組織認同與角色認同的關聯性,則採質性研究的深度焦點訪談,以內容分析來進一步探究其關聯性。
本研究發現關鍵人才培訓對於任務性績效的提升具有正向因果關係,關鍵人才培訓結合雙生涯發展對於情境績效、角色認同與組織認同的提升具有關聯性,而角色認同對於工作績效提升具有正向關聯,但組織認同對工作績效提升的關聯性不高。本研究的發現對於個案公司人力資源發展單位及管理階層,針對關鍵人才未來的專業訓練模式、生涯管理制度、人員遴選及汰換,可以作為進一步精進的參考。
Talent is the key factor to a company’s long-term competitiveness. In order to establish a competitive advantage with professional depth, the subject company implemented a long-term plan to develop key talent in the field of future strategic development; in order to address the career development of key talent within the organization, a dual promotion of dual career path was established. The purpose of this study is to explore how this company’s key talent training system affects work performance, and identification with the organization and their roles. Key talents from various fields selected by the subject company were chosen as research subjects to track their mission-based performance data before, during, and after training for analysis. Verification of the causal relationship between training benefits and mission-based performance was established by a single case study method with parallel cross-participants and parallel cross-conditions in a multi-baseline design; scenario performance of key talent training with dual career development and the correlation of organization and role identification were investigated using qualitative research-based in-depth interviews before using content analysis to further explore their correlation.
This study found a positive causal relationship between key talent training and improved mission-based performance; key talent training integrated with dual career development exhibited correlation to an increase in scenario performance, role identification, and organization identification; role identification exhibited a positive correlation to increased work performance, but organization identification did not show a significant correlation to an increase in work performance. This study found that the subject company’s human resource development department and management level’s systems for professional training, career management, staff selection or elimination for key future talent can be used as a reference for further refinement.
一、中文部份
丁姵元(譯)(2012)。組織行為(原作者:S. P. Robbins & T. A. Judge)。臺北市:普林斯頓。(原著出版年:2011)ISBN: 978-986-6534-85-0
王力行(總編輯)(2014)。要創新,就得投資人才(原作者:M. Mehregany)。哈佛商業評論2014年夏季號特刊,21-23。
方素華(總編輯)。(2019)。關鍵人才請上座【專題】。EMBA雜誌,392,66-82。2020年7月11日,取自http://www.emba.com.tw/
古永佳、楊雪蘭(譯)(2018)。企業研究方法(原作者:D. R. Cooper & P. S. Schindler)。臺北市:美商麥格羅希爾。(原著出版年:2014)ISBN: 978-986-341-082-9
李文政(譯)(2015)。社會科學研究方法—資料蒐集與分析(原作者:S. Best)。新北市:心理出版社。(原著出版年:2012)ISBN: 978-986-191-639-2
李政賢、廖志恆、林靜如(譯)(2015)。質性研究導論(原作者:U. Flick)。臺北市:五南。(原著出版年:2002)ISBN: 978-957-11-4635-5
李佩玲(2007)。高科技產業員工學習動機、訓練成效與工作績效之相關性研究。國立新竹教育大學職業繼續教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
李錦雯(2009)。大學音樂系學生「音樂人」角色認同之探討。國立台南大學藝術研究學報,2(1),33-62。2020年8月29日,取自http://readopac2.ncl.edu.tw/nclJournal/GetPDF?tid=A09066860&jid=08000099&eid=c9523f14704ed81d8bc1f565441c7d5c
林文政(2006)。工作績效,只是落後指標—發現企業關鍵人才。人才資本,5,6-7。2020年8月9日,取自http://readopac1.ncl.edu.tw
林文寶、吳萬益(2006)。技術知識資源特性、知識學習能力、核心競爭力與創新績效關聯性織研究。東海管理評論,8(1),187-230。2020年7月12日,取自http://readopac.ncl.edu.tw/nclJournal/
林麗惠(1997)。成人參與在職進修訓練的自評成效及相關因素之研究—以職訓局所屬職業訓練中心學員為例。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
林宜君(2016)。組織行為。臺北市:新學林。ISBN: 978-986-295-567-3
林東清(2019)。資訊管理—e化企業的核心競爭能力。臺北市:元照。ISBN: 978-957-511-112-0
林崇孝(2014)。關鍵人才管理對組織績效之影響:組織策略、環境不確定性及國際化程度的調節效果。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
林震岩(2019)。智慧企業e化4.0 AI時代的企業資訊系統。臺北市:旗標。ISBN: 978-986-312-589-1
俞志緯(2013)。任務性、脈絡性及適應性績效對晉升力之影響。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園市。
陳幼慧(2002)。內部勞動市場實施程度與員工之生涯承諾之關聯性探討。國立海洋大學航運管理系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
陳淑卿(2016)。角色認同、組織認同對會館經理人工作績效關聯性之研究。國立高雄師範大學事業經營學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
張添洲(1993)。生涯發展規劃。臺北市:五南。ISBN:957-110-641-0
張仁家(2017)。企業訓練與發展。臺北市:全華。ISBN:978-986-463-440-8
張秀玲(2001)。高屏地區學前教育教師生涯承諾與其相關因素之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東市。
張緯良(2011)。人力資源管理本—本土觀點與實踐。新北市:前程文化。ISBN: 978-986-7239-35-8
鈕文英、吳裕益(2015)。單一個案研究法—研究設計與後設分析。新北市:心理出版社。ISBN:978-986-191-649-1
黃佳純(譯)(2015)。績效管理(原作者:H. Aguinis)。臺北市:華泰文化。(原著出版年:2013)ISBN: 978-957-609-955-7
楊孟麗、謝水南(譯)(2017)。教育研究法研究設計實務(原作者:J. R. Fraenkel, N. E. Wallen, & H. H. Hyun)。新北市:心理出版社。(原著出版年:2011)ISBN: 978-986-157-987-0
楊濱燦、林少龍、黎哲愷(2015)。服務氣候、組織認同與服務導向公民行為織研究。樹德科技大學學報,17(1),1-20。2020年8月2日,取自http://readopac1.ncl.edu.tw/nclJournal/GetPDF?tid=A15012731&jid=68900084&eid=d0a7820e52dae3a0957f0397d5efcc38
葉俊偉(譯)(2012)。人力資源發展(原作者:R. A. Swanson & E. F. Holton)。臺北市:五南。(原著出版年:2009)ISBN: 978-957-11-6642-1
蔡源成、李淑芳、紀文章(2009)。內部勞動市場對員工知識管理能力與創新績效影響之研究。商管科技季刊,10(4),593-624。2020年7月19日,取自http://www.cabmt.org.tw/uploads/upload/6797da985177dc9b10ee79b1171cbfc6.pdf
潘進丁(2019)。O型全通路26個獲利模式。臺北市:城邦商業週刊。ISBN: 978-986-7778-63-5
鄭曜邦(2017)。工業4.0下關鍵人才之核心能力。中國文化大學社會科學院勞工關係學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
劉韻僖、卓秀足、俞慧芸、楊仁壽(合譯)(2018)。組織理論與管理六版(原作者:G. Jones)。臺北市:雙葉書廊。(原著出版年:2010)ISBN:978-986-280-087-4
簡貞玉(譯)(2008)。員工訓練與能力發展(原作者:R. A. Noe)。臺北市:五南。ISBN:978-986-157-396-0
簡建忠(2009)。人力資源發展從粉筆到數位滑鼠。新北市:前程文化。ISBN:978-986-7239-99-0
謝廷豪、陳鈺淳與廖元良(2018)。教師不同工作壓力源、角色內外工作表現與自我效能相互影響之關係。國立台灣科技大學人文社會學報,14(2),71-98。2020年8月8日,取自於http://ir.lib.ntust.edu.tw/bitstream/987654321/72031/2/.pdf
鍾珮珊、林文政(2015)。以動態觀點探討適應性績效對員工晉升力的影響。輔仁管理評論,22(3),93-114。doi: 10.29698/FJMR
全家便利商店股份有限公司2018年年報,刊印日期2020年3月23日。2020年5月2日,取自http://mops.twse.com.tw/
全家便利商店股份有限公司2019年年報,刊印日期2019年3月25日。2020年6月28日,取自http://mops.twse.com.tw/
全家便利商店股份有限公司2018年企業社會責任報告書。2020年3月26日,取自http://www.family.com.tw/newenterprise/csr/CsrreportIndex/
全家便利商店股份有限公司2019年企業社會責任報告書。2020年8月5日,取自http://www.family.com.tw/newenterprise/csr/CsrreportIndex/
二、外文部份
Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 77-87. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/1998/09/how-to-kill-creativity
Arthur, M. B.. & Rousseau, D. (1996). A new career lexicon for the 21th century. The Academy of Management Executive, 10(4), 28-39. doi: 10.5465/ame.1996.3145317
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. A. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39. doi: 10.2307/258189
Beach, D. S. (1985). Personnel: The management of people at work. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc. ISBN: 978-0023070600
Becker, G. S.(1993). Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. Jorunal of Political Economic, 70(5), 50-79. doi: 10.1086/261880
Best, S. (2012). Understanding and doing successful research: Data collection and analysis for the social sciences. London, England: Routledge. ISBN: 978-1315833545
Borman, W. C. & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organization (pp. 71-78). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Press. ISBN: 978-1555424756
Brinkerhoff, R. O. (1987). Achieving results from training: How to evaluate human resource development to strengthen programs and increase impact. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Press. ISBN: 978-1555420444
Brinkerhoff, R. O. (1988). An integrated evaluation model for HRD. Training & Development, 42(2), 66-68. Retrieved from https://www.questia.com/magazine/1G1-6256374/an-integrated-evaluation-model-for-hrd
Brotheridge, C. M., & Lee, R. T. (2003). Development and validation of the emotional labour scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(3), 365-379. doi: 10.1348/096317903769647229
Brown, M. E. (1969). Identification and some condition of organizational involvement. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 346-355. doi: 10.2307/2391129
Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough(Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 687-732). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. ISBN: 978-0891060420
Cheney, G. (1983). On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identification. Communication Monographs, 50(4), 342-362. doi: 10.1080/03637758309390174
Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2014). Business research methods. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0073521503
Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1988). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York, NY: The Free Press. ISBN: 978-0029080610
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363-406. Retrieved from https://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/blogs/freakonomics/pdf/DeliberatePractice(PsychologicalReview).pdf
Foreman, P., & Whetten, D. A. (2002). Members' identification with multiple-identity organizations. Organization Science, 13, 618-635. doi: 10.1287/orsc.13.6.618.493
Gilley, J. W, Eggland, S. A., & Gilley, A. M. (2009). Principles of human resource development. New York, NY: Basic Books. ISBN: 978-0738206042
Hall, D. T. (2002). Career in and out of organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. ISBN: 9780761915478
Haslam, S. A., Powell, C., & Turner, J. C. (2000). Social identity, self-categorization, and work motivation: Rethinking the contribution of the group to positive and sustainable organizational outcomes. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(3), 319-339. doi: 10.1111/1464-0597.00018
Hochschild, A. R. (2012). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN: 978-0520272941
Katou, A. A. (2009). The impact of human resource development on organizational performance: Test of a causal. Journal of Behavioral & Applied Management, 10, 335-356. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242091942_The_Impact_of_Human_Resource_Development_on_Organisational_Performance_Test_of_a_Causal_Model
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1960). Techniques for evaluation training programs. Joural of the American Society of Training Directors, 14(11), 13-32. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/ fulltext/ED057208.pdf#page=41
Le Deist, F. D., & Winterton, J. (2005). What is competence? Human Resource Development International, 8, 27-46. doi: 10.1080/1367886042000338227
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). The factory as a learning laboratory. Sloan Management Review, 34(1), 23-38. Retrieved from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-factory-as-a-learning-laboratory
Lepak, D., & Snell, S. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development, Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 31-48. doi: 10.2307/259035
Lobel, S. A., & Clair, L. St. (1992). Effects of family responsibilities, gender, and career identity salience on performance outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35(5), 1057-1069. doi: 10.2307/256540
Malhotra, N. K. (1997). The impact of the academy of marketing science on marketing scholarship: An analysis of the research published in JAMS. Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 25(2), 138-151. doi: 10.1177/0092070396244001
McDonald, K. S., & Hite, L. M. (2005). Reviving the relevance of career development in human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 4, 418-439. doi:10.1177/1534484305281006
Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (2013). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York, NY: Academic Press. ISBN: 9781483267395
Petkus, E. J. (1996). The creative identity: Creative behavior from the symbolic interactionist perspective. Jounal of Creative Behavior, 30(3), 188-196. doi: 10.1002/j.2126-6057.1996.tb00768.x
Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A. & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in heworkplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612-624. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.612
Rafaeli, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1989). The expression of emotion in organizational life. Research in Organizational Behavior, 11, 1-42. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/curhan/www/docs/Articles/15341_Readings/Affect/TheExpressionOfEmotionInOrganizationalLife_RafaeliSutton.pdf
Robbins, S. P. (2005). Organizational Behavior, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. ISBN: 9780131914353
Sun, Y. S., & Jin, N. C. (2014). Multiple dimensions of human resource development and organizational performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 851-870. doi: 10.1002/job.1993
Super, D. E. (1982). The relative importance of work: Models and measures for Meaningful data. The Counseling Psychologist, 10(4), 95-103. doi: 10.1177/0011000082104018
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, L. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London, England: Sage. ISBN: 978-0803932517
Tawney, J. W., & Gast, D. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill. ISBN: 978-0675201353
van der Sluis, L., & Pooell, R. (2003). The impact of career development of learning behavior at work. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14(2), 159-180. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.1058
Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J., & Christ, O. (2004). The utility of a broader conceptualization of organizational identification: Which aspects really matter?. Journal of Occupation and Organizational Psychology, 77(2), 171-358. doi: 10.1348/096317904774202135
Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job edication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 525-531. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.525