研究生: |
宋沛寰 Sung, Pei-Huan |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
資優生自我調整學習策略運用及心流經驗 The Use of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies and Flow Experiences in Gifted Students |
指導教授: |
郭靜姿
Kuo, Ching-Chih |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
特殊教育學系 Department of Special Education |
論文出版年: | 2015 |
畢業學年度: | 103 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 219 |
中文關鍵詞: | 資優生 、自我調整學習 、心流經驗 、科展 |
英文關鍵詞: | gifted students, self-regulated learning, flow experiences, science fair |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:240 下載:161 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究採質性研究法,旨在探究資優生自我調整學習(SRL)策略的使用情形、習得來源與階段,以及進行科展時SRL策略運用與心流經驗的表現情況。研究參與者為台中市國中二年級資優生,研究者以半結構式深度訪談進行研究。在「自我調整學習訪談題綱」部分共有16位學生參與,並接續以「進行科展時策略運用與心流經驗訪談題綱」訪談15位參與科展研究的學生,瞭解其SRL策略運用與心流經驗的實際表現情況,最後輔以非干擾性測量作為補充及驗證。本研究以分析歸納法進行資料分析,透過協同編碼、同儕簡報、同儕審核與研究參與者檢核等方式確保研究可信性、符合研究倫理。本研究主要結果如下:
一、 資優生在自SRL策略的使用上以「尋求社會援助」、「記錄與監控」、「自我評估」、「目標設定與計畫」為主;使用頻率較低的策略為「複習紀錄」、「自我獎懲」。
二、 資優生在策略習得來源上以「個人經驗」為主,較少提到的策略來源是「同儕」與「手足」;「國小」為主要習得策略的階段。
三、 進行科展時,影響資優學生正負向感受的主要因素為「成就感」與「同儕關係」。
四、 資優生的SRL策略在科展上運用比例最高是「尋求社會援助」,接續是「尋求資訊」、「目標設定與計畫」、「自我評估」,而運用最少的策略仍為「自我獎懲」。
五、 資優生進行科展時的心流經驗,最常被提到的是「挑戰與能力適配」、「明確的目標」、「時間感改變」、「自發性經驗」,在「潛在的操控感」、「知行合一」的經驗較少。
六、 進行科展時運用策略頻率高的資優生,在陳述心流經驗的感受也較佳。
This qualitative study aimed to explore the use of self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies, sources and stages of acquisition, as well as the use of SRL strategies and flow experiences during science fairs in gifted students. The participants of this study were students from the second grade of a public junior high school in Taichung city. The research, in which 16 students participated for the “Self-Regulated Learning Interview Schedules (SRLIS)” section, and 15 students for the “Use of SRL Strategies and Flow Experiences During Science Fairs” section, was based on in-depth semi-structured interviews targeted at understanding the actual performance of SRL strategies and flow experiences, and combined with unobtrusive measures for supplementation and verification of the data. This study adopted the analytic induction method for data analysis. In line with research ethics, collaborative coding, peer debriefings, peer reviews, member checks, were used to ensure the credibility of the results. The main findings are the following:
1. “Seeking social assistance”, “keeping records and monitoring”, “self-evaluation”, and “goal-setting and planning” are the main SRL strategies used by gifted students; “Reviewing records “ and “ Self-consequences” strategies are used infrequently.
2. The main source of strategies are “personal experiences”, “peers” and “siblings” are rarely mentioned as sources; “elementary school” is the main stage at which SRL strategies are acquired.
3. During science fairs, “sense of achievement” and “peer relationships” are the main factors affecting both positive and negative feelings of gifted students.
4. Also during science fairs, “seeking social assistance” is the most frequently used SRL strategy, followed by “seeking information”, “goal-setting and planning” and “self-evaluation”; the strategy least used is “self-consequences”.
5. The most frequently mentioned flow experiences during science fairs mentioned by gifted students are: “challenge-skills balance”, “clear goals”, “altered sense of time” and “autotelic experiences”; infrequently mentioned experiences are: “sense of potential control” and “action-awareness merging”.
6. Gifted students who frequently use SRL strategies while participating in science fairs, also indicate better feelings of flow experiences.
中文部分
王琡棻(2009a):資優生情意特質的一體兩面。國小特殊教育,48,100-110。
王琡棻(2009b):資優是一種恩賜,還是困擾¬—談資優生情意特質的正反面與輔導策略。資優教育季刊,113,26-35。
王琡棻(2011):國小資優學生認知—情意交織特質之分析及其介入方案成效之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
王瑞璇(2007):建構取向學習、學習心流經驗與幸福感之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
王慧鶯(2011):臺南市國小資優學生壓力與幸福感之相關研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。
王慧鶯、陳振明(2011):淺談資優生的壓力與幸福感。國小特殊教育,51,74-83。
王靜惠(1998):網路瀏覽涉入與流暢經驗之相關性探討(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
白雲霞(2012):補習與教學型態對數學低成就生之文字題表現的影響。教育實踐與研究,25(2),1-34。
吳沛青(2005):高雄市國小一般智能優異學生和普通學生過度激動特質與生活適應之比較研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東市。
吳昆壽(2006):資優教育概論。臺北市:心理。
吳武典(2005):臺灣教育改革的經驗與分析:以九年一貫課程和多元入學方案為例。當代教育研究季刊,13(1),38-68。
呂明勳(2008):國小課業壓力、自我調整學習策略與課業成就之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
呂鳳儀(2015):桃園地區國中生網路使用時間、人格特質、人際關係、網路心流經驗 對網路成癮之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。大葉大學,彰化市。
巫博瀚(2005):由自我調整學習理論探討教師之教學輔導策略。研習資訊,22(6),57-65。
李乙明(譯)(2012):資優學生的特質。載於潘裕豐(總校閱),資優教育概論(頁1-22)。(G. A. Davis, S. B. Rimm, & D. Siegle)。臺北市:華騰。(2010)
李冷華(2008):國小學童知識信念、自我調整學習策略與學業成就之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
李麗琴(2007):自我調整學習模式對國小五年級學童的營養知識、態度及飲食行為之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。屏東教育大學,屏東市。
周巧芳(2005):嘉義市國小高年級學童學校壓力與因應策略之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。
林文正(2002):國小學生自我調整學習能力、對教師自我調整教學之知覺、動機信念與數學課業表現之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東市。
林妙華(2003):資優生過度激動特質與友伴關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
林幸台、李乙明、王琡棻(2006):輔導與追蹤。杜正勝(主持人),資優教育輔導與追蹤。全國特殊教育發展研討會,國立臺灣師範大學。
林建平(2002):資優生的自我調整學習。資優教育季刊,85,31-35。
林建平(2004):學童自我調整學習之調查研究。臺北市立師範學院學報,3(1),1-24。
林建平(2005):自律學習的理論與研究趨勢。國教新知,52(2),8-25。
林清山、程炳林(1996):國中生自我調整學習因素與學習表現之關係暨自我調整的閱讀理解教學策略效果之研究。教育心理學報,28,15-58。
林清文(2002):自我調整課業學習模式在課業學習諮商的應用。彰化師大輔導學報,23,229-275。
林清文(2003):高中高職學生基礎學科自我調整課業學習策略研究。中華輔導學報,13,1-44。
林義涵(2013):國中資優學生數學學習心流經驗之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。
侯雅齡(2009)。幼兒資優特質與科學創造力之關係:心流經驗之中介效果。特殊教育研究學刊,34(2),101-118。
胡清閔(2011):國中資優學生自律學習能力之研究—以國中數學科為例(未出版碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。
范子琪(2008):由網路玩家之心流體驗探討深度休閒與網路成癮之相關性(未出版之碩士論文)。世新大學,臺北市。
唐乾玲(2014)。路跑愛好者休閒內在動機與心流體驗之關係-比較心流構面與路徑之差異(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北護理健康大學,臺北市。
孫石(譯)(2002)。自我的追尋(Fromm E.)。台北:新潮文庫。
涂繼元(2011):登山自行車騎乘者休閒參與動機、休閒涉入和心流體驗關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。中國文化大學,臺北市。
張永進(2004):高峰表現、高峰經驗與流暢經驗之比較。大專體育,71,153-159。
張春興(2002):教育心理學。台北:東華書局。
張桇羿(2012):網路教學平台使用效能對學生的心流經驗與學習經驗之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,臺北市。
張馨仁(2000):從Dabrowski的理論看資優生的情緒發展。資優教育季刊,74,6-18。
張馨仁(2011):過度激動特質對於資優生與普通生學習表現、創造力及心理適應之預測研究(未出版博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系,臺北市。
教育部(2012):身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定標準。臺北市:教育部。
教育部(2013):特殊教育法。臺北市:教育部。
教育部(2014):中華民國中小學科學展覽會實施要點。台北市:教育部。
連婉婷(2013):臺北市高中階段資優生與一般同儕的同理心反應研究-以多向度結構模式為基礎(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
郭淑珍(2010):正向心理學的意涵與學習上的應用。銘傳教育電子期刊,2,56-71。
郭肇元(2003):休閒心流經驗、休閒體驗與身心健康之關係探討(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
郭靜姿(1990):談資優學生的特殊適應問題與輔導。資優教育季刊,75,1-6。
郭靜姿(2000)。談資優學生的特殊適應問題與輔導。資優教育季刊,75,1-6。
郭靜姿、張馨仁、張玉佩、周坤賢、林燁虹、陳雪君、林慶波(2012):高中數理資優班學生心理特質與大腦結構之研究。教育心理學報,43,805-831。
郭靜姿、劉貞宜(2001):在資優生個別化教育計劃設計。資優教育季刊,81,18-27。
郭靜姿、蔡尚芳、王曼娜(1998):跳級資優學生之生活適應分析。特殊教育研究學刊,16,379-400。
郭靜晃(2006):青少年心理學。臺北市:洪葉文化。
陳志恆(2009):自我調整學習理論對學生課業學習外部干擾的處理與啟示。臺灣心理諮商季刊,1(4),1-13。
陳志恆、林清文(2008):國中學生自我調整學習策略量表之編製及效度研究。輔導與諮商學報,30(2),1-36。
陳明照、黃德祥(2000):自我調節學習的理論與應用。載於黃德祥(主編),教育改革與教育發(頁131-158)。臺北市:五南。
陳彥瑋(2006a):國小美術班學生興趣、心流經驗與學習成就之研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
陳彥瑋(2006b):談心流理論對資優教育的啟示。資優教育季刊,101,1-9。
陳若男(2011):國小資優生自我引導學習與鷹架支持之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。台北市。
陳淑芬(2013):高職學生人格特質、心流體驗對網路沉迷之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學,台中市。
陳聖明(2011):國中資優生與普通生知情意交織特質、自我效能與幸福感之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
陳慶峰(2001):從心流(flow)理論探討線上遊戲參與者之網路使用行為(未出版之碩士論文)。南華大學,嘉義縣。
曾素芬(2014):自助旅遊者之休閒涉入及心流體驗及休閒滿意度之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。嶺東科技大學,臺中市。
程炳林(1995):自我調整學習的模式驗證及其教學效果之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
程炳林(2000):認知/意動成份與學習表現之相關研究。師大學報:教育類,45(1),43-59。
程炳林、林清山(1999):國中生學習行動控制模式之驗證及行動控制變項與學習適應之關係。教育心理學報,31(1),1-35。
程炳林、林清山(2001)。中學生自我調整學習量表之建構及其信效度研究。測驗年刊,48(1),1-41。
鈕文英(2014):質性研究方法與論文寫作。臺北市:雙葉書廊。
黃珮琇(2005):國中資優生過度激動特質與創造力之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
黃隆興、張德勝、王采薇(2010):國小資優生與普通生家庭社經背景及文化資本之比較研究。教育與多元文化研究,2,59-94。
黃瓊慧(2000):從沈浸(flow)理論探討台灣大專學生之網路使用行為(未出版之碩士論文)。國立交通大學,新竹市。
楊珮茹(2003):消費者購物動機、涉入與心流經驗關係之研究─以百貨公司女性消費者為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄第一科技大學,高雄市。
楊筱筠(2007):國小高年級學生知覺父母管教方式、父母期望與自我調整學習關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
詹秀玉(2005):科展表現優良師生之互動歷程分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
趙珮晴、余民寧(2012)。自律學習策略與自我效能、學習興趣、學業成就的相關研究。教育研究集刊,58(3),1-32。
劉佩雲(1999):兒童自我調整學習之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
劉佩雲(2000):自我調整學習模式之驗證。教育與心理研究,23,173-205。
劉念肯(2011):正向心理學的建構與應用。諮商與輔導,304,2-5。
劉炳輝(2006):國小原住民學童適應行為、文化認同、自我調整學習與其學業成就關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東市。
劉盈利(2009):國小高年級學生認知風格、自我調整學習策略與學業成就關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。高雄師範大學,高雄市。
蔡正信(2009):高屏地區國中美術班學生心流經驗與創造力之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東市。
蕭善有(2012):臺東縣國中教師休閒心流經驗、休閒體驗、生活滿意度關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺東大學,臺東市。
謝志偉(2003):自我調節學習理論之探究。課程理論季刊,6(3),147-168。
謝志偉(2007):國小資優生A型行為、內外控信念與學校壓力之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
顏巧怡(2008):高中資優生與普通生認知—情意交織特質、正向支持環境及志願服務傾向之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
魏麗敏(1996):影響國小兒童數學成就之自我調節學習與情感因素分析及其策略訓練效果之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
魏麗敏、黃德祥 (2001):國中與高中學生家庭環境、學習投入狀況與自我調節學習及成就之研究。中華輔導學報,10,63-118。
蘇貞菱(2013):臺灣地區大學音樂系管樂主修學生練習與自我調整學習情況之探究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,台南市。
外文部分
Amabile, T. (1989). Growing up creative. New York: Crown
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 75-78.
Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (1), 87-99.
Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp.193-281). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Boekaerts, M. (1994). Action control: How relevant is it for classroom learning? In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and Personality (pp. 427-433). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.
Boekaerts, M. (1999). Motivated learning: The study of student situational transactional units. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(4), 41–55.
Borkowski, J.G.(1985). Signs of intelligence: Strategy generalization and metacognition. InS. Yussen (Ed.), Developmentof reflectionin children (pp.105–144). New York: Academic Press.
Burke, P. J. (1980). The self: Measurement implications from a symbolic integrationist perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 18-29.
Chan, T. S., & Ahern, T. C. (1999). Targeting motivation-adapting flow theory to instructional design. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 21(2), 151-163.
Chen, H., Wigand, R., & Nilan, M. (1999). Optimal experience of web activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 15 (5), 585-608. Retrieved from: http://cm.nsysu.edu.tw/~hschen/human.pdf
Chen, H., Wigand, R., & Nilan, M. (2000). Exploring web users’ optimal flow experience. Journal of Information Technology and People, 13(4), 263-283.
Clark, B. (2013). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at school and at home (8th ed.). Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Clarke, S. G., & Haworth, J. T. (1994). ‘Flow’ experience in the daily lives of sixth-form college students. British Journal of Psychology, 85, 511-523.
Comallie-Caplan, L. (2012). The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree: gifted parents parenting gifted children. SENGVine. Retrived from: https://sengifted.org/archives/articles/gifted-parents-parenting-gifted-children
Corno, L. (1989). Self-regulated learning: A volitional analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory of research, and practice (pp. 83-110). NY: Springer-Verlag.
Corno, L. (1993). The best-laid plans: Modern conceptions and educational research. Educational Research, 22(2), 14-22.
Cross, T. (1996). Psychological autopsy provides insight into gifted adolescent suicide. Gifted Child Today, 19(3), 22-23.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety: The experience of play in work and games. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper Collins..
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). The evolving self. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1998). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. (1988). Introduction to part Ⅳ. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological study of flow in conscious (pp.251-265). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rathunde, K. (2014). The development of the person: An experiential perspective on the ontogenesis of psychological complexity. In R.M. Lerner (Ed.), Applications of flow in human development and education: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (pp. 7-79). New York, NY: Wiley.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Abuhamdeh, S., & Nakamura, J. (2005). Flow. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 598–608). New York: Guilford Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Larson, R., & Prescott, S. (1977). The ecology of adolescent activity and experience. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 6(3), 281-294.
Dabrowski, K., & Piechowski, M. M. (1977). Theory of levels of emotional development: Volume II - from primary integration to self-actualization. Oceanside, New York: Dabor Science Publications.
Dabrowski, K., (1964). Positive disintegration. Boston: Little Brown.
Davis, G. A. & Rimm, S. B. (1998). Education of the gifted and talented (4rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Davis, G. A. (2006). Gifted children gifted education. Arizona: Great Potential Press, Inc.
Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B., & Siegle, D. (2011). Education of the gifted and talented. London, UK: Pearson.
DeCharms, R. (1984). Motivation enhancement in educational settings. In R. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Student motivation (Vol. 1, pp. 275–310). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
DeCharms, R. (1976). Enhancing motivation: Change in the classroom. New York, NY: Irvington
Dell Fave, A., & Massimini, F. (1988). Modernization and the changing contexts of flow in work and leisure. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological study of flow in conscious (pp.193-213). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Effeney G, Carroll A & Bahr N. (2013) Self-regulated learning: key strategies and their sources in a sample of adolescent males. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 13, 58-74.
Fiedler, E. D. (1999). Gifted children: The promise of potential/the problems of potential. In V. L. Schwean & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), Handbook of psychosocial characteristics of exceptional children (pp. 401-441). New York: Kluwer Academic /Plenum.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
Glasersfeld, E. von (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge and teaching. Synthese, 80(1),121-140.
Gottfried, A. E., & Gottfried, A. W. (1996). A longitudinal study of academic intrinsic motivation in intellectually gifted children: Childhood through early adolescence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 179-183.
Gross, M. U. M. (1998). The“Me”behind the mask: Intellectually gifted students and the search for identity. Roeper Review, 20(3), 167-173.
Harris, K. R., Friedlander, B.D., Saddler, B., Frizzelle, R. & Graham, S. (2005). Self-monitoring of attention versus self-monitoring of academic performance: Effects among students with ADHD in the general education classroom. Journal of Special Education, 39 (3), 145-156.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
Helms, B. J. (1985). A study of the relationship of child stress to demographic, personality, family, and school variables. ( Doctoral Abstracts International, No AAC 8516190).
Jackson, S. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Flow in sports. United States, IL: Human Kinetics.
Jackson, S. A., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The flow state scale. Journal of sport and exercise Psychology, 18, 17-35.
Jarvela, S., & Jarvenoja, H. (2011). Socially constructed self-regulated learning and motivation regulation in collaborative learning groups. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 350-374.
Kardash, C. M., & Amlund, J. T. (1991). Self-reported learning strategies and learning from expository text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 117–138.
Knighten, K. (1984). The gifted of failure. Creative Child & Adult Quarterly, 9(3), 169-173.
Kuhl, J. (1984). Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action control. In B. A. Maher(Ed.), Progress experimental personality research (V0l. 13, pp. 99-171). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Kuhl, J. (1985). Volitional mediators of cognitive-behavior consistency: Self-regulatory process and action versus state orientation. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action Control: from Cognition to Behavior (pp.101-128). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Kuhl, J. (1994). A theory of action and state orientation. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality (pp. 9-46). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.
Kuhl, J., & Kraska, K. (1989). Self-regulation and meta-motivation: Computational mechanisms, development, and assessment. In R. Kanfer, P. L. Ackerman & R. Cudeckl (Eds.), Abilities, motivation, and methodology: The minnesota symposium on individual differences (pp. 343-374). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kurtz, B. E., & Borkowski, J. G. (1987). Development of strategic skills in impulsive and reflective children: A longitudinal study of metacognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 43, 129-148.
Lefevre, J. (1988). Flow and the quality of experience during work and leisure. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological study of flow in conscious (pp.307-318). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lovecky, D.V. (1992). The exceptionally gifted child. Understanding Our Gifted, 4 (4), 3-4.
Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: parentchild interaction. In E.M. Hetherington (Ed.), P.H. Musen (series Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology, 4, 1-101. NY: Wiley.
Manning, B. H., Glasner, S. E., & Smith, E. R. (1996). The self‐regulated learning aspect of metacognition: A component of gifted education. Roeper Review, 18(3), 217-223. DOI: 10.1080/02783199609553741
Manning, B. H., Glasner, S. E., & Smith E. R. (2010). The self-regulated learning aspect of metacognition: A component of gifted education. Retrieved from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02783199609553741#.UcMeRj5Z6zw doi: 10.1080/02783199609553741
Martinez-Pons, M. (2002). Parental influences on children’s academic self-regulatory development. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 126-131.
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper.
Maslow, A. H. (1964). Religions, values, and peak experiences. London: Penguin Books Limited.
Massimini, F. & Carli, N. (1988). The systematic assessment of flow in daily experience. In M. Csikszentmihalyi, & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.). Optimal experience: Psychological study of flow in conscious (pp.266-287). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Massimini, F., Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Carli, M. (1987). The monitoring of optimal experience: A tool for psychiatric rehabilitation. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders, 175, 545-549.
McCombs, B.L. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A phenomenological view. In B. J. Zimmerman and D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.) (pp. 67–123). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Meador, K. (1996). Meeting the needs of young gifted students. Childhood Education, 73(1), 6-9.
Mendaglio, S. (1995). Sensitivity among gifted persons: A multi-faceted perspective. Roeper Review, 17, 169-172.
Mendaglio, S., & Tillier, W. (2006). Dabrowski’s theory of positive disintegration and giftedness: Overexcitability research findings. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30, 68-87.
Moilanen, K. L. (2006). The adolescent self-regulatory in inventory: The development and validation of a guestionnarive of short-term and long-term self-regulation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(6), 835-848.
Moneta, G. B., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). The effect of perceived challenges and skills on the quality of subjective experience. Journal of Personality, 64(2), 275-310.
Nota, L., Soresi, S., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-regulation and academic achievement and resilience: a longitudinal study. International Journal of Educational Research, 41( 3), 198-215.
Novak, P. T. & Hoffman, L. D. (1997). Measuring the flow experience among web users. Interval Research Corporation, Retrieved from: http://ecommerce.vanderbilt.edu/reseach/topics/flow/index.htm
Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Yung, Y. F. (1997). Modeling the structure of the flow experience among web users. Retrived from: http://wiki.commres.org/pds/Project_7eNrf2010_2fPlan/Modeling%20the%20structure%20of%20the%20flow%20experience%20among%20Web%20users.pdf
Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Yung, Y. F. (1999). Measuring the customer experience in online environment: A structural modeling approach. Marking Science, Winter, 19(1), 22-44.
Paris, S. G. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 89-102.
Paris, S. G., Byrnes, J. P., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Constructing theories, identities, and actions of self-regulated learners. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 253–287). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Parke, B., N. (1989). Gifted students in regular classrooms. Boston, MA: AlIyn and Bacon.
Piechowski, M. M. (1991). Emotional development and emotional giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.). Handbook of Gifted Education. (pp. 285–306). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts & P. P. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16 (4), 358-407.
Pintrich, P. R., & Degroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self- regulated components of classroom, academic performance. Journal of Educational psychology. 90(1), 118- 148.
Pintrich, P. R., Cross, D. R., Kozma, R. B. & Mckeschie, W. J. (1986). Instructional psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 611-651.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1989). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
Pintrich, P., & Schunk, D. (2002). Motivation in education. Translated by Shahrara, M. Tehran: Publication of Elm.
Piskurich, G. M. (1993). Self-directed learning: a practical guide to design. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Purdie, N., Hattie, J., & Douglas, G. (1996). Students’ conceptions of learning and their use of selfregulated learning strategies: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 87–100.
Ramdass, D., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Developing self-regulation skills: The important role of homework. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(2), 194-218.
Reis, S. M. & Housand, A. M. (2007). Characteristics of gifted and talented learners: similarities and differences across domains. In F.A. Karnes & K. R. Stephens (Eds.), Achieving Excellence: Educating the Gifted and Talented. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Reis, S. M., Neu, T. W., & McGuire, J. M. (1995). Talents in two places: Case studies of high ability students with learning disabilities who have achieved (Research Monograph 95114). Storrs: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(5), 180-184.
Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53-92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rettie, R. (2001). An exploration of flow during Internet use. Internet Research, 11(2), 103-113.
Risemberg, R., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1992) Self‐regulated learning in gifted students, Roeper Review, 15(2), 98-101. DOI: 10.1080/02783199209553476
Roedell, W. C. (1984). Vulnerabilities of highly gifted children. Roeper Review, 6, 127-130.
Russell, W. D. (2001). An examination of flow state occurrence in college athletes. Journal of Sport Behavior, 24(1), 83-108.
Sayler, M. F. (2009). Flow. In B. Kerr (Ed.), Encyclopedia of giftedness, creativity, and talent (Vol. 1, pp. 358-360). New York, NY: Sage.
Schuler, P. A. (1999). Voices of Perfectionism: Perfectionistic Gifted Adolescents in a Rural Middle School (RM99140). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
Schunk, D. (2001). Social–cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 125–151). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 173-208.
Schunk, D. H. (1994). Self-regulation of self-efficacy and attribution in academic settings. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 305-314). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Ehbaum Associates.
Schunk, D. H. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children’s cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 359-382.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1997). Social origins of self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist, 32, 195-208.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and application. New York, NY: Routledge.
Scruggs, T . E., & Cohn, S. J. (1983). Learning characteristics of verbally gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27 (4), 169-172.
Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1985). Spontaneous verbal elaboration in gifted and non-gifted youths. Journalfor theEducation ofthe Gifted,9 (1),1-10.
Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A.(1988). Acquisition and transfer of learning strategies by gifted and nongifted students. Journal of Special Education, 22 (2), 153-166.
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., Jorgensen, C., & Monson, J.A. (1988). Effective mnemonic strategies for gifted learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 9 (2), 105-121.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being. New York: Free Press.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14.
Shavinina, L. V. (1997). Extremely early high abilities, sensitive periods, and the development of giftedness. High Ability Studies, 8(2), 243-256.
Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi M. & B. Schneider (2003) Student Engagement In High School Classrooms From the Perspective of Flow Theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2),158-176.
Siegle, D., & Schuler, P. A. (2000). Perfectionism differences in gifted middle school students. Roeper Review, 23, 39-45.
Silverman, L. K. (1993). The gifted individual. In L. K. Silverman(Ed.), Counseling the gifted and talented (pp. 3-28). Denver: Love.
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571-581.
Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S. D., Darling, N., Mounts, N. S., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1994). Over‐ time changes in adjustment and competence among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Development, 65(3), 754-770.
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Successful intelligence. New York, USA: Plume.
Sternberg, R.J., & Williams, W.M. (2002). Educational psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Stoeger, H. (2006). Identification of giftedness in early childhood. Gifted and Talented International, 20(2), 47–66.
Stoeger, H., & Ziegler, A. (2005). Evaluation of an elementary classroom self-regulated learning program for gifted math underachievers. International Education Journal, 6, 261–271.
Tavakolizadeha, J., Yadollahib, H., & Poorshafeic, H. (2012). The role of self regulated Learning strategies in psychological well being condition of students. Procedi- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 807–815.
Taylor, S. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 67-85.
Tsui, J. M., & Mazzocco, M. M. M. (2007). Effects of math anxiety and perfectionism on timed versus untimed math testing in mathematically gifted sixth graders. Roeper Review, 29(2), 132-139.
Van Tassel-Baska, J. (2003). What matters in curriculum for gifted learners: Reflections on theory, research and practice. In N. Colangelo & G.A. Davis (Eds.) Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 174-183). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Soenens, B., & Luyckx, K. (2006). Autonomy and relatedness among Chinese sojourners and applicants: Conflictual or independent predictors of well-being and adjustment? Motivation and Emotion, 30, 273-282.
White, C. S., & Manning, B. H. (1994). The effects of verbal scaffolding instruction on young children's private speech and problem-solving capabilities. Instructional Science: An International Journal of Learning and Cognition, 22(1), 39-59.
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2008). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research and applications (pp. 298-314). New York, NY: Lawrence.
Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 189-205.
Wolters, C.A. (2011). Regulation of motivation: Contextual and social aspects. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 265-283.
Ziegler, A. & Stoeger, H. (2008). A learning oriented subjective action space as an indicator of giftedness. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50, 222-236
Ziegler, A. (2005). The actiotope model of giftedness. In R. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 411-434). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Preprint
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 1-25). NY: Springer Verlag.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25 (1), 3-17.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 3-21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (Chap. 2) San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Achieving academic excellence: A self-regulatory perspective. En M. Ferrari (Ed.), The pursuit of excellence through education (pp. 85-110). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41 (2), 64-70.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Sociocultural influence and students’ development of academic self-regulation: A social-cognitive perspective. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisted (pp.139-164). Greenwhich, CT: Information Age.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Campillo, M. (2003). Motivating self-regulated problem solvers. In J. E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of problem solving (pp. 233-262). NY: Cambridge University Press.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (1997). Developmental phases in self-regulation: Shifting from process goals to outcome goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 29-36.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). The hidden dimension of personal competence: Self-regulated learning and practice. In A.J. Elliot, C.S. Dweck, & S. Carol (Eds.), Handbook of Competence and Motivation (pp. 509-526). New York: Guilford Publications.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing students’ use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614–628.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51-59.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 299-315). NY: Routledge.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Zimmerman, B. J., Bonner, S., & Kovach, R. (1996). Developing self-regulated learners: Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. Washington: APA.