本研究旨在探討解題者在心中揣想立體物件之方位經過移動、旋轉的過程，並預測其變化的過程與結果，以發展空間概念文獻中有關小空間模型操弄能力之立體旋轉定位問題解題策略。然而空間能力的認知思考受限於個人特質的影響而有不同的表現，因此，透過研究探索空間能力認知問題解題的歷程，將可提供發展不同程度空間能力特質者學習策略的基礎。
本研究透過文獻探討、專家會議等方式歸納分析立體旋轉定位空間能力問題解題策略量表試題，並經過第一階段兩次量表試題筆述解題歷程施測，確認第二階段有聲思考解題之試題，以解題思考歷程之理論與相關研究為基礎，藉由有聲思考訪談、觀察法探求其內心對立體旋轉定位空間能力問題的揣想與解題技巧，以分析空間能力問題解題者的思維邏輯。
研究對象以國立瑞芳高工綜合高中學生一年級兩班學生進行立體旋轉定位空間能力問題量表試題筆述解題歷程施測，經研究者與協同觀察者統整後，建立立體旋轉定位空間能力問題之解題法、物體特徵、旋轉基準、聯想經驗等四個解題面向，並據以分析其解題類別及思考關鍵，研究進而發展有聲思考訪談大綱進行訪談，研究針對訪談逐字稿進行原案分析，依照Schoenfeld六個解題歷程階段，按讀題、分析、探索、計畫、執行、驗證及轉移分析受訪者之解題歷程；研究並就基模資料庫、知識組織串連、問題表徵、解題策略及問題解決效能等五種項目分析熟手與生手解題者進行立體旋轉定位空間能力問題有聲思考解題成功與失敗的差異。
研究同時發展直覺思考解題、合理化解題、概念釐清解題及問題表徵解題等四項不同模式之解題策略，並據以歸納出十三項原則，以作為發展不同階層需求提昇空間能力適性學習策略之重要參考：
一、直覺思考解題策略：猜測判斷、經驗類推、假設推理。
二、合理化解題策略：歸納比對、揣測認同、逐步辨解、正解比對、對照刪去。
三、概念釐清解題策略：反覆驗證、經驗累積。
四、問題表徵解題策略：放棄求解、揣測求解、理論迷思。

This study aims at analyzing the solving strategies on the problems of tri-dimensional rotation orientation of the manipulation capability for the small-scale-space models in the literature of spatial conception, exploring the process of the tri-dimensional object’s locality, pondered in the problem solver’s mind, through its moving and rotating, and predicting the result and process of its shifting.
This study, through the discussion of literature, professionals’ seminars, etc., induced and analyzed the scale items for the problem-solving strategies of tri-dimensional rotation orientation and after experiencing the two-time scale items in the first phase, the problem-solving process was written down, so that the second-phase items of Thinking Aloud Problem Solving were confirmed. Based on the theories and relevant researches of the problem-solving reasoning process, the test-taker’s internal pondering and problem-solving techniques on the problems of tri-dimensional rotation orientation of the spatial ability were probed, by relying on both the Thinking Aloud Interviews and Observation, so as to analyze the logic of reasoning from the spatial-ability problem solvers.
The main subjects of this study were from the first-grade students in the comprehensive classes, Jui-fang Vocational High School, who were tested for problem-solving process in written forms with the scale items of the tri-dimensional rotational orientation of the spatial ability. After integration from the researchers and co-observers, four problem-solving aspects for the spatial ability of the tri-dimensional rotational orientation, including methods of problem solving, characteristics of objects, bases of rotation, and experience of association, were established, and then various types of problem solving and the keys to reasoning were analyzed. Furthermore, the outline for the Thinking Aloud interviews was developed and used for interviewing, for which Protocol Analysis was undertaken with the literal script obtained from the interviews. Thus, the problem-solving process of the interviewees was analyzed, in accordance with Schoenfeld’s six phases of problem-solving process: item-reading, analyzing, questing, planning, executing, experimenting and transferring. This study also analyzed the difference between success and failure for the Thinking Aloud problem solving on the problems of tri-dimensional rotation orientation spatial ability, undertaken by novice and expert problem solvers, in reference to the following five items: schema data bank, knowledge organization series, problem representation, strategic problem solving, and problem-solving efficiency. This study conclusively developed four different models of problem-solving strategies and thirteen principles as the following, so as to provide an essential reference for enhancing appropriate learning strategies for spatial ability in order to meet various levels’ requirements.
＊ Intuitive Reasoning of Problem Solving: surmising judgment, experience analogy, and suppositive inference
＊ Rationalization of Problem Solving: inductive contrast, surmise identity, step-by-step allegation, positive comparison and contrast deletion.
＊ Conception Clarification of Problem Solving: repetitive experiments and experience accumulation
＊ Representation of Problem Solving: resigning solution, surmising solution and theoretical misconception.

一、中文
丁振豐（民83）。三個心理學派典與空間能力研究之比較。台南師範學院初等教育學報，7，213～249。
王春展(民86)，專家與生手間問題解決能力的差異及其在教學上的啟示。教育研究資訊，1997-3，5(2)，80-92。
江淑卿、郭生玉（民86）。不同學習過程的概念構圖策略對促進知識結構專家化與理解能力之效果研究。師大學報，42，1～ 16。
吳和堂 （民84）。有聲思考法在教育上的應用。研習資訊 ，12 （3），14～17。
吳珍梅（民91）。女性主義觀點與沙圖象徵意涵之分析。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所博士論文，未出版。
吳煥昌（民90）。高工機械製圖科學生空間能力與展開圖學習成就之相關研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
吳德邦、吳順治 （民78）。解題導向的數學教學策略。臺北：五南。
孟小芬（2004），關於建構主義理論缺陷的質疑與思考。中國教育先鋒網，1。http://www.ep-china.net/article/theory/2004/02/20040228155137.htm
林生傳（民77）。新教學理論與策略。臺北：五南。
林秀娟（民82）。動態評量結合試題反應理論在空間視覺學習潛能評量之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文，未出版。
林清山 （民81）。教育心理學：認知取向。臺北：遠流。
林清山、張景媛（民83）。國中生後設認知、動機信念與數學解題策略之關係研究。教育心理學報，26，53～74。
林曉芳、余民寧（民90）。國中生在數學代數概念學習之評量研究 ── 以二元一次方程式為例。教育與心理研究， 24 （ 2）， 303～326。
洪文東（民85）。典範式思考與敘述式思考在科學文章閱讀中之關連性。國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所博士論文，未出版。
洪振方（民85）。科學知識重建的認知取向分析。高雄師大學報，7，293～328。
洪榮昭（民90）。知識創新與學習型組織。臺北：五南。
洪蘭 譯（民89）。腦內乾坤—男女有別，其來有自。臺北：遠流。
胡炳生（民86）。數學解題思維方法。臺北：九章。
胡幼慧編（民85）。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北：巨流。
孫達剛（民81）。雄中、雄女學生數學解題之研究Polya 解題四階段論取向。國立高雄師範大學數學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
康鳳梅（民94）。高中職學生空間能力提昇之研究。臺北：行政院國家科學委員會，NSC 93-2516-S-003-010-。
康鳳梅、戴文雄、李金泉、簡慶郎、陳憲章（民90），機械製圖交線與展開提昇學生空間能力之研究。第十六屆全國技術及職業教育研討會論文，313-322。
康鳳梅、戴文雄等（民90）。機械製圖交線與展開提昇學生空間能力之研究。第十六屆全國技術及職業教育研討會論文，313～322。
康鳳梅、鍾瑞國、劉俊祥、李金泉（民91）。高職機械製圖科學生空間能力之研究。師大學報，47（1），55～69。
康鳳梅、簡慶郎、詹秉鈞（民92），工程圖交線電腦化創意教材提昇學生空間能力之研究。師大學報，48（2），225~238。
許育齡（民94）。教師學習團體發展與運作歷程的紮根分析暨教師學習團體回饋系統之建構。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文，未出版。
張玉成（民82）。思考技巧與教學。臺北：心理。
張春興（民78）。張氏心理學辭典。臺北：東華。
張春興、林清山 （民70）。教育心理學。臺北：東華。
張麗芬（民78），兒童空間認知能力發展之研究。教育與心理研究，12，249～281。
陳采穗（民87）。虛擬實境在加強空間能力學習之研究。國立政治大學資訊研究所碩士論文，未出版。
黃敏晃（民80）。淺談數學解題。教與學，23 ，2～15。
葉淑華（民91）。高三學生思考歷程之個案研究—以鉛直簡諧運動為例。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
路君約、歐滄、盧欽銘（民78）。修訂區分性向測驗。臺北：中國行為。
裴新寧（2003）。東西理念碰撞：建構對教育的理解。開放教育研究，41，12～14。
劉俊祥（民89）。機械製圖科學生空間能力與立體圖成就表現之相關研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
劉英茂（民69）。基本心理歷程。 臺北：大洋。
劉貞宜 （民89）。數學資優生的解題歷程分析。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
劉國芬 （民86 ）。高雄地區高一學生高低數學成就之解題後設認知行為分析研究。國立高雄師範大學數學系碩士論文，未出版。
劉錫麒 （民86 ）。數學思考研究。臺北：師大書苑。
歐陽鍾玲（民71）。學童空間概念的發展。國立臺灣師範大學地理研究所碩士論文，未出版。
蔣家唐（民84）。視覺空間認知能力向度分析暨數理—語文資優學生視覺空間認知能力差異研究。臺北：行政院國家科學委員會， NSC84-2511-S-018-003。
鄭麗玉 （民87 ）。認知心理學。臺北：五南。
戴文雄（民82）。認知型態與空間觀念對機械製圖態度轉變與成效之研究。彰化師範大學學報，4，171～207。
戴文雄（民83）。學習型態與電腦輔助學習對機械製圖學習成效之研究。第九屆全國技術及職業教育研討會論文集一般技職及人文教育類，231～240。
戴文雄（民87）。不同正增強回饋刑事電腦輔助學習系統對不同認知型態與空間能力高工學生機械製圖學習成效之研究。臺北：行政院國家科學委員會，NSC86-2516-S-018-010-TG。
謝淡宜（民87）。小學五年級數學資優生與普通生數學解題時思考歷程之比較。臺南師院學報 ，31 ， 225～268 。
鍾聖校（民79）。認知心理學。臺北：心理。
簡慶郎（民90）。學習正投影對提昇高工學生空間能力之研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
顏榮義（民90）。國一一般資優生的解題歷程分析。國立高雄師範大學數學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
二、外文
Anderson, J. (1978). Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review, 85, 249-276.
Ausubel, D. P.（1968）. Educational Psychology：A Cognitive View. New York：Holt, Rinehart ＆ Winston.
Bandura, A. （1986）. Social foundations of thought and action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Baron, J.（1994）. Thinking and deciding. Cambridge University Press.
Battista, M. T. （1990）. Spatial visualization and gender difference in high school geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21（1）, 41-60.
Beyer, B. （1998）. Improving student thinking. Clearing House, Vol. 71 Issue 5, 262.
Bezuk, N,. and Cramer, K. （1989）. Teaching about Fractions: What, When, and How? In P. R. Trafton & A. B. Shutl (Eds.), New Directions for Elementary School Mathematics (pp. 156-167), 1989 Yearbook of NCTM, Reston, VA: NCTM.
Billy, C. Y. （1988）. The computer as an instructional aid and problem solving tool: An experimental analysis of two instructional methods for teaching spatial skills to junior high school student. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The graduate school of the university of Oregon.
Binet, A.,& Simon,T. （1905）. New methods for the diagnosis of the intellectual level of subnormals. Annals of Psychology, 11,191,390-400.
Bishop, A. J. （1980）. Spatial abilities and mathematics education-A review. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11, 257-269.
Bloom, B. S. & Broder, L. J.（1950）. Problem-solving processes of college students: an exploratory investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bollen,K.A. (1989)。Structural equations with latent variable。 New York：John Wiley.
Psychology, 23, 105-130.
Branca, N. A. (1990). Problem solving as a goal, process, and basic skill. In S. Krulik, & R. E. Reys (Eds.), Problem Solving in School Mathematics, 3-8.
Bourne, L.E., jr., & Domonowski, R.L. （1972）. Thinking. Annual Review of Psychology, 23, 105-130.
Brown, A.L. & Kane,M.J.（1988）. Prechool children can learning to transfer:Learning to learn and learning from example. Cognitive Psychology,20,493-523.
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Some elements of discovery. In L. S. Shulman & E. R. keisher (Eds.), Learning by discovery : A critical apprasal.
Carter, C. S., Larussa, M. A., Bodner G. M. （1985）. Spatial Ability in General Chemistry. NARST, French Lick.
Catling, S. J.（1978）The Child’s Spatial Conception and Geographic Education. Journal of Geography, 77,24-28.
Chase, W. G. and Simon, H. A. （1973）. Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55-81.
Chase, W. G., & Chi M. T. H. （1981）. Cognitive skill : Implications in Large-Scale Environments. In Harvey, J. H. （ed）. Cognition, social behavior, and the environment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Assoc, 111-136.
Chi, M. T. H., R. Glaser, and E. Rees（1982）, Expertise in problem solving. In Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence, R. S. Sternberg, ed. Hillsdale , NJ Erlbaum, Vol. 1, pp. 1-75.
Cohen, M. M.（1983）. Combining techniques to enhance protection against high sustained Accelerative forces. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 54, 338-342.
Combs, M.L., & Slaby, D.A. （1977）. Social skills training with children. In B.B. Lashey & A.A. Kazdin (Eds.), Advance in clinical child psychology. I. New York: Plenum Press.
Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. （1977）: Aptitudes and instructional methods : A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington.
Davis,R. B.（1984）.Learing Mathematics.New Jersey:Ablex Publish-ing Corporation.
De Bono, E. （1982/1996）. The Mechanism of mind. 唐潔之（ 譯）。思考的奧秘— 思考探奇。臺北：桂冠。
Dean, A. L., & Scherzer, E. （1982）. A comparison of reaction time and drawing measures of mental rotation. Journal of experimental child psychology, 34, 20-37.
Dewey, J. （1933）. How We Think. Chicago:Henry Regnery.
Dewey, John（1916）. Democracy and Education. New York: Macmiillan.
Dodson, .J. W. (1972). Characteristics of successful insightful problem solvers. NLSMA Report No. 31. Stanford, Calif.: School Mathematics Study Group.
Donelson, F. L. （1990）. The development, testing, and used of a computer interface to evaluate an information processing model describing the rate of encoding and mental rotation in high students of high and low statial ability. （ED 326 396）.
Duncker, K. （1945）. On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58（5）,Whole No.270.
Eliot, J.（1980）. Classification of figural spatial tests. Preceptual and Motor skills, 51（1）,847-851.
Fisher, K. M. & Lipson, J. I.(1986). Twenty questions about student errors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23 (9), 783-803.
Fong-Mei Kang & Ching-Lang Jean & Bing-Jiun Jan（2003）. The Study of Spatial Ability Indicators for Industrial Vocational High School Students. 1st North-East Asia International Conference on Engineering & Technology Education,National Changhua University of Education.
Fong-Mei Kang , David W.S. Tai, Ching-Lang Jean & Bing-Jiun Jan（2004）.The Study on Development of Spatial Ability Scale for Vocational High School Students.7th UICEE ANNUAL Conference on Engineering Education.
Fong-Mei Kang, Ching-Lang Jean, Huei-Cheng Chang, Yir-Hueih Chung （2004）. A Study of Orthographic Projection Learning of Promotion on the Spatial Ability for Vocational Industrial High School In Taiwan, 9th World Conference for Continuing Engineering Education.
Fong-Mei Kang, Ching-Lang Chien, Yir-Hueih Chung, Bing-Jiun Jan（2005）。Applying Constructivism to the Learning of Science and Technology in Higher Vocational Education: An Example of Instructional Strategy for Improving Students’ Spatial ability。Peking University (China)：4th International Conference on Technology in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,317~321.
Fong-Mei Kang, Ching-Lang Chien, Yir-Hueih Chung, Bing-Jiun Jan（2005）。A Study of Object Surface Development Problem-Solving。2st NORTH-EAST ASIA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION,191~195.
Ericsson, K.A. & Simon, H. A. （ 1984 ）. Protocol analysis:Verbal repoets as Data . The MIT Cambridge Massachusetts London, England.
Frydman, M. & Lynn, R. （1992）. The general intelligence and spatial abilities of gifted young Belgian chess players. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 233-235.
Gagne’, E. D.（ 1985 ）.The Cognitive Psychology of School Learning.Brown and Company:Boston.
Gallagher, S. A. & Johnson, E. S. （1992）. The effect of time limits on performance of mental rotations by gifted adolescents. The gifted child quarterly, 36, 19-22.
Gardner（1983）.Frames of Mind: The theory of Multiple Intelligence. New York: Basic Books. This is the bible of multiple intelligence. For more information on Gardner’s research in MI Theory, write: Project Zero, Horvard University, Longfellow Hall, Appian Way, Cambridge, Ma02138.
Geary, D.C., Gilger, J.W., Elliot-Miller, B.（1992）. Gender differences in three-dimensional mental rotation: A replication. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 153, 115-117.
Guilford, J. P. （1967）. The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Guilford, J. P., & Lacey, J. I. （1947）. Printed Classification Tests, A.A.F. Aviation Psychological Progress Research Report, No. 5, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Halpern, D. F. （1989）. Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. (2nd ed.). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hayes, .J. R., & Flower, L. （1981）. Uncovering cognitive processes in writing: An introduction to protocol analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
Heller, J. I., ＆ Hungate, H. N. （1985）. Implications for mathematics instruction of research on scientific problem solving. In E. A. Silver(Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving：Multiple research perspective (pp. 83-112). Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Holly, C. D., & Dansereau, D. F. （1984）. Spatial learning strategies. N.Y. : Academic press.
Holyoak, K. J., & Spellman, B. A. （1993）. Thinking. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 265-315.
Jamison, W.R., （1987）. Geometric analysis of fold development in overthrust terranes: Journal of Structural Geology, 9, 207-219.
Kail, R. （1985）. Developmental functions for speeds of cognitive processes. Journal of experimental child psychology, 40, 181-192.
Kelly, T. L. （1928）. Crossroads in the mind of man. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Kilpatrick, J. （ 1967 ）. Analyzing the solution of word problems in mathematics:An exploratory study （Doctoral dissertation.Stanford University ） Dissertation Abstracts,28（11）,4380A..
Kilpatrick, J. （ 1985 ）. A retrospective account of the past 25 years of research on teaching mathematical problem solving. Paper presented at Silver, E. A. （Ed.）, Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving :Multiple research perspectives.1-15.Hilsdale, N.J.：Erlbaum Associates.
Kimble, G. A.（1967）. Foundation of conditioning and learning. New York: Appleton.
Kosslyn & Hellige、Michimate.（1989）. Evidence for two types of spatial representations: Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology,15,723-735.
Krulik, S. K., & Rudnick, J. A. (1989). Problem solving : A handbook for senior high school teachers. Boston, MA:Aiiyn & Bacon.
Krutetskii, V.A. ( 1963 ). Some characteristics of the thinking of pupils with little capacity for mathematics. In B. Simon & J.Simon (Eds.), Educational psychology in the USSR. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Langer, E. J. （1978）. Rethinking the role of thought in social interactions. In Harvey, J. H., Ickes, W.,and Kidd, R. F. （Eds.）, New Directions in Attributio n Research, 2, 35-58.
Larkin, J. H., McDermott, J. Simon, D. P. and Simon, H. A. （1980）. Models of competence in solving physics problems. Cognitive Science, 4:317-348.
Larson,L. C. （ 1983 ）. Problem-solving Through Problems. New York: Springer.
Lester, F. K. （ 1980 ） Problem solving：Is it a problem？ In M. M. Lindquist （Ed.）, Slected issues in mathematics education, 36. Berkeley Calif.：McCutchan.
Lester, F. K.（1980）Research on mathematical problem solving. In R. J .Shumway（Ed.）,Research in mathematics education.NCTM.
Liben, L. S. （1981） Spatial representation and behavior: Multiple perspectives. In L.S. Liben, A. H. Patterson & N. Newcombe （Eds）. Spatial representation and behavior across the life span: Theory and application. N.Y.: Academic press.
Lisi R. D.; Wolford J. L.（2002）. Improving chidren's mental rotation accuracy with computer game playing. The Journal of Genetic Psychology. 163(3）,p 272-282.
Lohman, D. F. （1979）. Statial ability: Individual differences in speed and level （Tech. Rep. No.9）. Stanford,CA: Stanford University, Aptitude Research Project, School Of Education.（NTIS No. AD-A075973）
Lohman, D. F., & Kyllonen, P. C. （1984）. Individual differences in solution strategy on spatial and change. In S. Koch（Ed.）, Psychology: A study of Science（Vol.3, pp.423-75）. New York: McGraw-Hill CO.
Lord, T. R. （1985）. Enhancing the visual-spatial aptitude of students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22（5）, 395-405.
Lord, T. R. （1987）. Spatial teaching. The Science Teacher, 52（2）, 32-34.
Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. （1974）. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Maclure, S. , & Davies, P. （1989）. Learning to think :thinking to learn .Oxford, New York, Seoul, Tokyo: Pergamon Press.
Maslow, A. （1954）. Motivation and personality. New York: Harper.
Mason, J. et al. （ 1985 ） Thinking mathematically.California:Addion-Wesley Publishers.
Mayer, R. E. （1983）. Thinking, Problem solving, Cognition. New Yo rk: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Mayer R.E. （ 1985 ） Implication of Cognitive Phychology for Instruction in Mathematical problem solving. In E.A.Sliver （Ed）, Teaching and Learning Mathematical Problem Solving. Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mayer, R. E. （1990）. The process of cognitive psychology. University Press of America, Inc.
Mayer R.E. （ 1992 ）. Thinking, problem solving, cognition, 387-414.New York：W. H. Freeman and Company.
McCormack, A. （1988）. Visual/spatial thinking: An element of elementary school science. Council for elementary science international, San Diego State University.
McGee, M. G. （1979）. Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, sciences, 3, 215-227.
Merriman, W. E., Keating, D. P. & List, J. A. （1985）. Mental rotation of facial profiles, age –sex and ability- related differences. Developmental psychology, 21, 888-900.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, M. （1994）. Qualitative data analysis.（2nd ed.）. Thousand oaks, CA : Sage Publications Inc.
Miller, G. （1956）. The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing in-formation. The Psychological Review, 63,81-97.
Mumaw, R. J. （1985）. Different slopes for dihherent folks: process analysis of spatial aptitude. （ERIC ED 263 139）
Mumaw, R.J.& Pellegrino, J. W.（1984）.Individual differences in complex spatial processing. Journal of Educational Psychology,76（5）, 920-939.
Newell, A. & Simon, H. （1972）. Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Novak,J.D.（1977）. A Theory of Education.Ithaca,NY:Cornell University.
Olson, D. R., & Astington, J. W. （1993）. Thinking about thinking: learning how to take statements and hold belief. Educational Psychologist,28（1）,51-66.
Pallrand, G., & Seeber, F. （1984）. Spatial ability and achievement in introductory physics. Journal of research in science teaching, 20, 239-246.
Pearson, J. L., & Ialongo, N. S. （1986）. The relationship between spatial ability environmental knowledge. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6, 299 – 304.
Perkins, D., Jay, E., & Tishman, S. （1993）. Introduction: new conceptions of thinking. Educational Psychologist,28（1）,1-5.
Petersen, A. C., & Crockett, L. （1985）. Factors influencing sex differences in spatial ability during adolescence. （ERIC ED 263 493）
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. （1975）. The origin of the idea of chance in children. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
Piaget, J. （1952）. The origins of intelligence in children. N.Y.:Int. Uni. Press.
Piaget,J.（1950）. The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Polya, G.（ 1945 ）. How to solve it. Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press.
Pribly, J. R. & Bordner, G. M. （1985）. The Role of Spatial Ability and Achievement in Organic Chemistry.（ERIC ED 255 393）.
Rene' Descartes（1637）. La Geometrie.
Resnick, L. B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational researcher, 16(9), 13-20.
Robertson, S. I.（2001）. Types of thinking. 李美綾（譯）。思考模式。臺北：五南。
Rogers, Everett M.（1995）. Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed.), New York, NY: The Free Press.
Ruggiero, V. R.（1987）, The Art of Thinking. 游恒山（譯）。實用思考指南。臺北：遠流。
Sanne Dijkstra （1997）, The integration of instructional systems design models and constructivistic design principles, Instructional Science, 25, 1-13
Schoenfeld, A. H. （ 1985 ）. Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic Press.
Schoenfeld, A. H. and D. J. Herrmann （1982）. "Problem Perception and Knowledge Structure in Expert and Novice Mathematical Problem Solvers." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 484-494.
Schoenfeld, A.H. （ 1980 ）. Teaching problem-solving skills. American Mathematical monthly,87（10）,794-805.
Shepard, R. N. （1978）. The mental image. American psychologist, 33（2）, 125-137.
Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. （1971）. Mental rotation of three dimensional objects. Science, 171（1）, 701-703.
Simon, H. A. （ 1980 ）. Problem solving and education. In D. T. Tuma,&F. Reif（Eds.）.Issues in teaching and research.Hillsdale,MJ:Erlbaum.
Simon,D.P. & Simon,H.A.（1978）.Individual differences in solving physics problem,In R.Siegler（E.d）. Childrens thingking:What develops?
Smith, I. M. （1964）. Spatial ability: Its educational and social significance. San Diego: Knapp, 4Osp.
Stewart, J., & Atkin, J. （1982）. Imformation processing psychology: A promising paradigm for search in science teaching. Journal of Reacher in Science Teaching,19,321-332.
Srauss, A.& Corbin, J. （2001/2003）. Basics of qualitative research.
吳芝儀、廖梅花譯。紮根理論研究方法。台北：濤石。.
Tai, W. S.& Kang, F. M.（1995）.A Study on Task Analysis for Engineering Drawing Technicians. Fourth World Conference on Engineering Education.Oct.15-20,1995, Saint Paul.
Thurston L. L. （1938）. Primary mental abilities. Chicago:University press.
Tishman, S. Perkins, D. N. & Jay, E. （1995）. The Thinking Classroom. Boston: Allyn amd Bacon.
Vigil, P. J. （1988）. Oline retrieval: Analysis and Strategy . NY: John Wiley & Sons.242p.
Vygosky, L. S.（1981）. The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch(Ed.), The concept of activity in soveit psychology(pp. 144-188). NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Wavering, M. J. （1986）. Performance of students in grades six, nine, twelve on five logical, spatial, and formal tasks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23（4）, 321-329.
Zavotka, S. （1985）. The use of three-dimensional computer graphics animation to teach spatial skills to home economics college students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the Ohio state university.