中文摘要
本研究以旨在探討高職教育變革中技職教師工作壓力感受與教師效能感相關之研究，為達成研究目的，進行相關文獻之蒐集及分析以作為研究架構的基礎，爾後自編「高職教育變革中技職教師工作壓力感受量表」。經項目分析、因素分析後具有良好的信、效度。與陳政偉所編之「高職教師效能感量表」，合成一份問卷作為量化資料蒐集之研究工具。樣本係以台灣地區九十二學年度辦理綜合高中73校中，抽取高職辦理綜合高中學校26所560位技職教師為施測對象，回收有效問卷共424份，有效回收率為75.71%。
本研究所使用的統計分析方法主要包括平均數（means）、標準差（standard deviation）、百分比（percentages）、平均數差異考驗（t-test）、單因子變異數分析（one-way ANOVA）、雪費事後比較法（schaffer’s posterior comparisons）、皮爾遜積差相關（pearson’s product-moment correlation ）等，經分析結果獲致下列結論：
ㄧ、高職教育變革中技職教師工作壓力屬於高於中等程度。各構面之工作壓力以「變革負荷」達高壓力水準，「產業落差」、「修習第二專長」、「高職發展」達高於中等壓力水準，而以「學生行為」未達中等程度。
二、高職教育變革中技職教師效能感屬於高於中等程度。各構面之工作壓力以「個人教學效能感」最高，「個人專業效能感」次之，而以「一般教學效能感」未達中等程度。
三、不同「學校隸屬」、「性別」、「婚姻狀況」、「兼任職務」之技職教師工作壓力具有顯著差異。
四、不同「學校隸屬」、「性別」、「婚姻狀況」「參與產業」之技職教師效能感具有顯著差異。
五、高職教育變革中技職教師工作壓力與效能感具有顯著差異的相關。

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to study the correlation between working stress and the sense of efficiency for those technical teachers who work in the process of educational reforms in vocational high schools. To fulfill this purpose, some related literatures were collected and analyzed to serve as the basis of this research structure. After the information collected and analyzed, I complied a table named “Measurement table on the working stress for those technical teachers who work in educational reforms in vocational high school ”, which was combined with another table named “The sense of efficiency of technical teachers ” compiled by Mr. Chen, Cheng-Wei to form a questionnaire which further served as a tool for collecting quantitative information. Among 73 comprehensive high schools in Taiwan area in 2003, samples were taken form 560 technical teachers in 26 comprehensive high schools, which were extended from their original form as a vocational high school. The effective questionnaires returned were 424 copies, and the effective returned rate was 75.71%.
The statistical analytic methods applied in this study are means, standard deviation, percentages, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Schaffer’s posterior comparisons, Person’s product-moment correlation etc. The conclusions of analytic outcome are depicted as follows:

1. The working stress of technical teachers who work in the process of educational reforms in vocational high school is higher than medium level. Among various aspects that cause working stress, “Load resulted from reforms” has reached high level. For the aspects of “Industrial Discrepancy”, “Practicing the second skill”, and “Development of vocational high schools”, working stress is higher than medium level and that of “Student behavior” is lower than medium level.

2. The sense of efficiency for those technical teachers who work in the process of educational reforms in vocational high school is higher than medium level. Among various aspects that cause working stress, “The sense of efficiency in personal teaching” is the most significant factor. “The sense of efficiency in personal profession” is the second, and “The sense of efficiency in general teaching status” doesn’t reach medium level.

3. There are significant differences in the working stress of technical teachers in terms of “school to which a teacher belongs”, “ Gender”, “Marital status” and “Side positions and duties”.

4. There are significant differences in the sense of efficiency of the technical teachers in terms of “ school to which a teacher belongs”, “Gender”, “Marital status”, and “Participation in industry”.

5. There is a significant differential correlation in the working stress and the sense of efficiency for those technical teachers who work in the process of educational reforms in vocational high school.

參考文獻
一、中文部分
王受榮（1992）。我國國民中小學教師效能感及其影響因素之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
王亦榮（1997）。白化症學生個人信念、壓力知覺、因應風格與身心適應之關係。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所博士論文。
王亞萍（2004）。高中職轉型領導與學校組織變革關係之研究。雲林科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文。
史欽泰（2001）。第22屆行政院科技顧問題會議。

江展塏（1995）。國民小學校長領導型式與教師教學自我效能關係之研究。台北市立師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文。
江文雄（1996）。技術及職業教育概論。台北：師大書苑。
行政院教育改革審議委員會（2002）。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北：行政院教改會。
宋禮彰（2002）。組織變革中國民小學行政人員工作壓力與因應方式之研究。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
李玉嬋（1992）。實習教師效能訓練與同儕支持小團體輔導在團體歷程﹑治療因素及效果之比較。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
李志祥（2003）。台北市高職轉型為綜合高中之問題研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文。
李聲吼（2000）。人力資源發展。台北：五南。

林保豐（2002）。國民小學教師工作壓力、工作價值與組織承諾相關之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
何郁玲（1999）。中小學教師職業倦怠,教師效能感與生命意義感關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
吳清山（1992）。學校效能研究。臺北：五南圖書公司。
吳清山（1996）。學校行政。臺北：心理出版社。
吳清基（1995）。技職簡訊月刊。教育部技術與職業教育司。
吳清基（1998）。技職教育的轉型與發展，提升國家競爭力的作法。台北：師大書苑
吳明隆（2000）。SPSS 統計應用實務。台北：松崗電腦圖書。
胡瓊文（1999）。學校組織成員屬性、組織文化與組織變革支持度之研究─以台北市國民中小學為例。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
施淑文（2002）。職業學校轉型綜合中現況之研究─職業類科教師觀點。東海大學教育研究所碩士論文。
施正文（2002）。我國高級中等學校化工專業教師工作壓力與因應方式之研究。國立台北科技大學技術職業教育研究所碩士論文。
莊謙本（2001）。高職教師進修第二專長的需求性與時間安排。技術及職業教育月刊第六十三期。台北：教育部。
莊謙本、黃雅萍知識經濟時代技職教育的因（2001）。知識經濟時代技職教育的因應之道六十七期。技術及職業教育月刊第六十三期。台北：技術職業教育中心。
孫志麟（1992）。國民小學教師自我效能及其相關因素之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
徐昊杲（1995）。淺談教師效能感。技術及職業教育月刊，29，38-41。
徐昊杲（1996）。我國專科學校技職類科教師其教師效能感研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文。
徐昊杲（1999a）。我國專科學校技職類科教師其教師效能感影響因素研究。論文發表於教育部技術及職業教育司主辦之「第十四屆全國技術及職業教育研討會」，台南。
徐昊杲（1999b）。我國專科學校技職類科教師其教師效能感研究。技術及職業教育學報。
徐昊杲（1999c）。影響專科學校技職教師效能感成因及其因應策略之研究（計畫編號：NSC 88-2516-S-003-009）。台北：行政院國家科學委員會。
徐善德（1997）。高職教師工作價值觀、組織承諾與教學效能關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。
教育部（2000）。職業學校法。台北：教育部。
教育部（2002）。職業學校規程。台北：教育部。
教育部（2002）。中華民國教育統計。台北：教育部。
教育部人事處（2004）。高級中等以下學校教師評審委員會組織及運作手冊。台北：教育部。
郭生玉（1987）。教師工作心壓與背景因素關係之研究。教育心理學報。
郭峰偉（2000）。國中教師工作壓力與教師效能關係之研究。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
梁茂森（1992）。高級職業學校教師教學成敗歸因及其相關因素之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。
陳木金（1997）。國民小學教師領導技巧、班級經營策略與教學效能關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。
陳青勇（2001）。國民小學兼行政職務教師工作壓力與因應方式之研究。國立台中師範學院進修暨推廣部國民教育研究所學校行政碩士學位班碩士論文。
陳金進（2002）。因應教育改革，促進職業教育精緻化。技職教育雙月刊，71，59-62。
陳政偉（2003）。台灣地區高職學校技職教師效能感之研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文。
陳瑞惠（2002）。私立高中教師工作價值觀、工作壓力與組織承諾之研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
陳聖芳（1999）。台東地區國小教師工作壓力與工作滿意度之研究。國立台東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
陳德欣（2001）。高級職業學校專業科目教師專業成長及其相關研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育學系博士論文。
陳素惠（2003）。我國綜合高中教師工作壓力與因應方式之研究。台北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文。
黃郁婷（2002）。台灣地區高職餐飲管理科老師教師效能與餐飲教學之研究（計畫編號：NSC 90-2413-H-034-004）。台北：行政院國家科學委員會。
黃政傑（2000）。認識職校的改革與出路，技職教育的發展與前膽。台北：師大書苑
張碧娟（1998）。國民中學校長教學領導、學校教學氣氛與教師教學效能關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。
張慶勳（1998）。學校組織行為。台北：五南。
張美雀（2003）。台北市綜合高中任教第二專長教學工作滿意度之研究。台北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文。
馮丹白（1993）。專科學校技職教師教學倦怠成因及其因應策略之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
劉威德（1994）。國中教師教學成敗歸因、社會支持與教學自我效能相關之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
蔡孟翰（2001）。中年教師覺知教育改革壓力、工作價值與生涯發展需求之關係研究。國立師範大學成人教育研究所碩士論文。
鄧柑謀（1991）。國民中學訓輔人員工作壓力、因應策略與職業倦怠關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
謝文全（1989）。教育行政─理論與實務。台北：文景出版社。
蘇衍綸（2002）。臺灣地區高中職餐飲管理科教師效能感之研究（計畫編號：NSC 90-2511-S-328-001）。台北：行政院國家科學委員會。
梁雅雯（2004）。科技大學教師學校組織變革知覺與組織承諾相關之研究。台北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文。
二、英文部分
Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., & Teasdale, J. D.（1978）. Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology , 87 , 49-74.
Ashton, P. T., Webb, R. B., & Doda, N.（1983）. A study of teachers' sense of efficacy. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B.（1986）. Making a difference: Teachers' sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.
Bandura, A.（1977）. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prantice-Hall.
Bandura, A.（1981）. Self-efficacy thought: A developmental analysis of self efficacy. In J. Flavell & L. Ross (Eds.), Social Cognitive development: Frontiers and Possible Future, 200-239. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Beatty, T. H. （2002）.The relationship between teacher sense of efficacy and pupil control ideology in urban middle schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The College of William and Mary, virginia.
Bigler, D. A.（1993）. A description of teachers' sense of self-efficacy of the first graduate elementary pre-service teacher cohort at Oregon State University. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Oregon State University.
Blau, S.D.（1981）.Commentary：Literacy as form of courage .Journal of Reading
Brennan, M. D., & Robison, C.（1995）. Gender comparison of teachers' sense of efficacy. New Mexico: Eastern New Mexico University.
Clark, C.M.,& Peterson, P.L. （1986）.Teachers’ thought processes. In M. Wittrock（Ed.）, Handbook of research on teaching（3rd ed.）
Denham, C. H., & Michael, J. J.（1981） Teacher sense of efficacy: A definition of the construct and a model for further research. Educational Research , 6 (1), 39-63.
Emmer, E. T. et al.,（1984）. Classroom Management for Secondary Teacher. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Fuller, B., Wood, K., Rapoport, T., & Dornbusch, S.（1982）. The organizational context of individual efficacy. Review of Educational Research, 52 (1), 7-30.
Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H.（1984）. Teacher efficacy: a construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology , 76 , 569-582.
Gray, J. E.（1992）. A comparative study of the sense of efficacy between novice African-American teacher graduates from historically black colleges and traditionally white colleges who teach in urban schools . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland College Park.
Greenberg,G.& Baron,R.（1997）.Behavior in Organization.（ED）.Englewood Cliffs,New Jersey：Prentice-Hail.
Greenwood, G. E., Olejnik, S. F., & Parkay, F. W.（1990）. Relationship between four teacher efficacy belief patterns and selected teacher characteristics. Journal Development in Education , 23 , 102-106.
Gruves, K. A.（1998）. A comparison of teachers’ sense of efficacy of traditionally and alternatively certified first-year teachers. University of north Texas.
Guskey, T. R.（1988）. Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education , 4 (1) ,63-69.
Haigh, N., & Katterns, B.（1984）. Teacher effectiveness: problem or goal for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education , 34 (5), 23-25.
Hanel, J. F.（1986）. The relationship of sex role identity and gender to self-efficacy expectations of perceived career options. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana State University.
Harwwell, S. H.（1998）. Self-efficacy as a predictor for integration of academic and vocational education among secondary teachers following a professional development program. University of South Florida.
Hawkins, C. H.（1996）. Lessons from the league: relationship between teacher involvement and sense of efficacy.
Huang, Y. T.（1999）. Teacher efficacy and factors associated with teacher efficacy of secondary occupational foodservice teachers. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University.
Klein, R. A.（1996）. Teacher efficacy and developmental math instructors at an urban university: an exploratory analysis of the relationships among personal factors, teacher behaviors, and perceptions of the environment. The University of Akron.
Kruse, S. D.（1997）. Reflective activity in practice: vignettes of teachers’ deliberatie work. Journal of research and development in education.31（1）,46-60.
Kurz, T. B.（2001）.An exploration of the relationship among teacher efficacy, collective teacher efficacy, and goal consensus. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University.
Kushner, S. N.（1993）. Teacher efficacy and pre-service teachers: A construction validation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association (16th, Clearwater Beach, FL, February 17-22,1993).
Medley, D.（1979）. The effectiveness of teachers. In P. Peterson and H. Walberg (Eds.). Research on Teaching: Concepts, Findings, and Implications. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
McCarthy, E.（1988）. An analysis of the relationship between teachers' sense of self-efficacy and their attitudes towards communication with parents of low-achieving students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Rosenshine, B. V.（1983）. Teaching functions in instructural programs. Elementary School Journal,83,335-351.
Sauceda, Noe（1995）. A descriptive study of the relationship between campus performance, efficacy, and selected teacher characteristics in elementary campuses in South Texas. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Texas University, Austin.
Scott, C. M.（1997）. Perceived general education teacher efficacy and students with high incidence disabilities. University of Washington.
Selye,H.（1956）.The stress of life. New York：McGraw-Hill.
Serna, A. G.（1990）. Personal, teacher training, teacher experience,and System factors associated with sense of efficacy of teachers of limited English proficient students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Pacific University.
Sisk, K. A. (1989). A study of beginning teachers' sense of efficacy. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Georgia State University.
Tien, J. P.（1996）. A comparison of alternatively and traditionally certivied teachers on teacher efficacy and students’ perceptions of their classroom environments. University of Maryland college park.
Vinson, B. M.（1995）. A comparison of sense of efficacy before and after clinical experience for pre-student-teaching novices in an elementary methods program.
Wingfield, M. E.（1997）. The effect of site based preservice experiences on elementary science teaching self-efficacy beliefs. University of Houston.
Woolfolk, A. E., Resoff, B., & Hoy, W.（1990）. Teachers’ sense of efficacy and their beliefs about managing students. Teaching & Teacher Education,6,137-148.