本研究之目的在了解大學女性教職員社會網絡與乳癌篩檢行為的分佈情形，及兩者之間的相關性，以提供未來提高大學女性教職員乳癌篩檢行為之參考。以立意取樣方式，由台北市選出四所大學，以自編之結構式問卷針對女性教職員進行問卷調查。重要結果如下：
一、 研究對象過去曾接受過臨床乳癌篩檢（乳房X光攝影、乳房超音波檢查、醫師臨床觸診）者比率超過五成，但規律接受者比率只有三成多，兩者之間有差距存在。研究對象未來兩年內願意接受臨床乳癌篩檢者接近七成，但願意規律接受乳癌篩檢的不到五成。
二、 研究對象之社會網絡成員特質為：關係上親屬成員略多；年齡平均為中年；教育程度以高教育水準為多數；婚姻狀況以已婚同住最多；性別以女性為主；多數認為網絡成員社會地位與自己相等；多數網絡成員職業與醫學無相關；女性社會網絡成員接受過乳癌篩檢比率約佔三成。研究樣本與網絡成員關係親密，認識時間平均在20年左右，社會支持互惠性很高。年齡及婚姻狀況以同質者較多，教育程度以異質者較多。社會支持總分高。
三、 研究對象年紀、婚姻狀況、職業、懷孕狀況、罹患乳房疾病、乳癌家族史、醫師建議狀況、網絡成員關係、網絡成員年齡、網絡成員教育程度、網絡成員婚姻狀況、網絡成員接受過乳癌篩檢、親密度、認識時間、情感性支持互惠性、教育程度同質性、所獲得的社會支持等變項不同時，研究對象過去接受臨床乳癌篩檢行為情形有顯著差異。
四、 研究對象之網絡成員接受乳癌篩檢狀況、所獲得之社會支持等變項不同時，研究對象未來接受臨床乳癌篩檢意願有顯著差異。
五、 年齡、職業、教育程度、婚姻狀況、醫師建議狀況、婚姻同質性、資訊性支持互惠、網絡成員社會地位等，是預測研究對象過去接受臨床乳癌篩檢行為的重要變項。
六、 年齡、職業、婚姻狀況、過去接受臨床乳癌篩檢狀況、婚姻同質性、網絡成員年齡、與網絡成員認識時間、網絡成員為親戚之人數等，是預測研究對象未來接受臨床乳癌篩檢意圖的重要變項。
依據研究結果，本研究針對後續研究、實務執行上提出若干建議，以作為未來類似研究與日後乳癌篩檢教育介入之參考。

The purpose of this study was to understand social network characteris-
tics and breast cancer screening behavior in school employees, and the relationship between them. The results of this research could be served as a reference for the promotion of school employee’s health programs. The subjects were sampled from the female employees of four universities in Taipei by using purposive sampling method, to give structured question-
naire formulated by the author. Important findings of this study were concluded as follows:
1. More than 50% of the subjects have received clinical breast cancer screening (mammogram, ultrasound and clinical breast examination), but only 30% have received it regularly. Near 70% of the subjects were willing to have clinical breast cancer screening in the future, but only less than 50% were willing to have it regularly.
2. The characteristics of the subjects’ social network members are have more relatives, middle-aged, higher education, married, female, have equivalent social level, careers have no correlation with medicine, 30% of female social network members have received breast cancer screening. The subjects have strong relationship with social network members, and duration of the relation are more than 20 years. They have high social support reciprocity with their social network members. They have higher homogeneity in age and marriage, and have lower homogeneity in education. They get high score in social support.
3. The subjects’ behavior of received clinical breast cancer screening in the past have significance different under the different variables of subjects’ age, marriage, career, pregnant, breast disease, if family members have breast cancer, if doctor’s suggestion, the relationship with social network members, social network members’ age, social network members’ education level, social network members’ marriage, if social network members have received breast cancer screening, the intimacy, the duration of relationship, reciprocity of emotion social support, homogeneity of education level, score of social support.
4. The subjects’ intention of being willing to receive clinical breast cancer screening in the future have significance different under the different variables of social network members receive breast cancer screening or not, and score of social support.
5. Age, career, education, marriage, doctor’s suggestion, homogeneity of marriage, reciprocity of information support, social position of net-
work members are significance variables to predict the behavior of subjects received clinical breast cancer screening in the past.
6. Age, career, marriage, have received clinical breast cancer screening in the past, homogeneity of marriage, age of network members, dura-
tion of relationship, relatives numbers among network members are significance variables to predict the willing of subjects receive clinical breast cancer screening in the future.
To sum up, this study aims to provide suggestions for the further study and practical execution, and would be a reference to the study and intervention of breast cancer screening education in the future.

王文科（2001）：教育研究法。台北：五南圖書。
王仕圖（1993）：快速成長的郊區社區之居民支持網絡與社區情感之研究：以『曉蘭』社區為例。東海大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
行政院主計處（2002）：勞動力參與率（2003/7/4）。網址：http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/dgbas03/bs2/91chy/table/s017.xls
行政院主計處（2003）：性別統計指標（2003/7/4）。網址：http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/census~n/four/yt3.xls#
行政院衛生署（1994）：接受過乳房自我檢查衛生教育的民眾遵行『乳房自我檢查』情形之追蹤調查。台北：行政院衛生署。
行政院衛生署(1998)：國民保健三年計畫草案。台北：行政院衛生署。
行政院衛生署（2003）：臺灣地區歷年女性每十萬人口死亡率按主要癌症分（2003/7/4）。網址：http://www.doh.gov.tw/statistic/data/
死因摘要/91年/表32.xls
呂昌明（1994）：以健康信念模式分析公共衛生護理人員執行乳房自我檢查之意圖。衛生教育論文集刊，第七期，142-153。
呂寶靜（2000）：老人朋友網絡支持功能之初探。社會政策與社會工作學刊，4（2），43-90。
沈志陽（2000）：臺灣乳癌的研究。科學發展月刊，28（9），675-678。
李效梅、郭憲文、劉波兒（1994）：台中地區兩所專科女生對乳房自我檢查知識、態度、行為之研究。弘光醫專學報，24，1-29。
李欣瑩（2001）：桃園市國中生主觀生活壓力、社會支持、因應行為與身心健康之關係研究。國立台灣師範大學衛生教育學系碩士論文。
李美華（1998）：社會科學研究方法。台北：時英出版社。
李從業、左如梅、蔣美蘭（1997）：衛教活動對女性教師乳房自我檢查知識、態度和信念的影響。醫學研究，17（6），344-360。
李從業（1997a）：以健康信念模式分析台北市中、小學女性老師乳房自我檢查。護理研究，5（4），366-376。
李從業（1997b）：台北市中、小學女性老師乳房自我檢查知識、態度及行為調查。國防醫學，25（4），317-323。
李燕鳴（2000）：乳癌篩檢。基層醫學，15（9），194-196。
季瑋珠、李蘭、林瑞雄（1991）：台北地區婦女乳房自我檢查頻率相關因素之研究。中華衛誌，10（5）：p248-259。
季瑋珠、黃俊升、張金堅（1997）：台灣的乳癌。中華衛誌，16（1），62-76。
林麗鳳（1989）：台中市北屯區婦女對乳房自我檢查之知識、態度、行為之調查研究。中台醫專學報，5，35-53。
洪彩慈、駱麗華（2000）：三位乳癌婦女的受苦歷程及社會支持。榮總護理，17（1）：72-80。
翁麗雀（2001）：乳癌病人之就醫行為。護理雜誌，48（3），71-74。
http://www.bhp.doh.gov.tw/letter/index.htm
教育部統計處（2001a）：大專院校校別專任教師數（2003/7/4）。網址：http://www2.edu.tw/statistics/index.htm
教育部統計處（2001b）：大專院校校別職員.警衛.工友人數（2003/7/4）。網址：http://www2.edu.tw/statistics/index.htm
國民健康局（2003a）：九十二年度癌症篩檢業務報告（2003/7/4）。網址：http://www.bhp.doh.gov.tw/letter/index.htm
國民健康局（2003b）：0307記者會表格.ppt（2003/7/25）。網址：http://www.bhp.doh.gov.tw/letter/index.htm
孫淑惠（1993）：美國某學院女性教師之健康信念與乳房自我檢查頻率之關係。長庚護理，4（2），77-81。
陳美筵、潘智仁、蔡志宏（2000）：彰化縣社區婦女參與乳房超音波檢查的概況與影響因素之探討。秀傳醫學雜誌，2(2)，65-73。
陳訓徹（2000）：乳癌的治療與方向。台北市醫師公會會刊，44（9），46-51。
陳清芬、季瑋珠、李文宗、林瑞雄（1994）：乳癌。醫學繼續教育，4（5），546-551。
楊國樞（1988）：中國人與自然、他人、自我的關係。引自文崇一、蕭新煌主編（1988）：中國人：觀念與行為。台北：巨流圖書。
葉必明（1993）：影響某教學醫院護理人員教導民眾乳房自我檢查之因素探討。中山醫學雜誌，4（1），13-21。
熊瑞梅（1999）：核心網絡的性別特質，台灣社會的個人網絡：第三次社會變遷基本調查研討會論文。台北：中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。
趙蘋、駱麗華（1993）：執業護理人員對乳房自我檢查的認知與行為。護理新象，3（12），557-574。
蔡孟娟（1998）：女性服用瘦身或美容產品之影響因素分析。國立台灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所碩士論文。
鄭宜仲、謝雨生、吳欣璇（2001）：社經地位對友誼網絡社會地位組合的影響。長庚護專學報，3，163-184。
蘇秀娟、黃璉華（1996）：團體教學課程對工廠女性員工乳房自我檢查知識、健康信念與行為之影響。護理研究，4（4），363-374。
劉建良（2001）：乳癌診療之原則與新趨勢。台北市醫師公會會刊，45（10），47-49。
Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980): Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Allen, J. D., Stoddard, A. M., Mays, J., & Sorensen, G. (2001): Promoting breast and cervical cancer screening at the workplace: Results from the woman to woman study. American Journal of Public Health. 91(4), 584-590.
Allen, J. D., Sorensen, G., Stoddard, A. M., Colditz, G., & Peterson, K. (1998): Intention to have a mammogram in the future among women who have underused mammography in the past. Health Education and Behavior, 25(4), 474-488.
Allen, J. D., Sorensen, G., Stoddard, A. M., Peterson, K. E., & Colditz, G. (1999): The relationship between social network characteristics and breast cancer screening practices among employed women. Ann Behav Med, 21(3), 193-200.
American Cancer Society(2003a), Risk Factors & Prevention. (2003/7/4)。網址：http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/
CRI_2_1x.asp?dt=5
American Cancer Society(2003b), Early Detection, Diagnosis, Staging. (2003/7/4)。網址：http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/
CRI_2_1x.asp?dt=5
Bahar, Z., Altug, O.S., & Erefe, I. (1995)：A study to determine womens attitudes in breast self-examination. European Journal of Cancer. 31(6). S271-272.
Berkman, L. F., and Glass, T. (2000) : Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. In L. F. Berkman and I. kawachi (eds.), Social epidemiology. New York: Oxford press.
Calle, E. E., Miracle-McMahill, H. L., Moss, R. E., & Heath, C. W. (1994): Personal contact from friends to increase mammography usage. Am J Prev Med, 10(6), 361-366.
Canadian Cancer Statistics 1993.（1993）. Toronto, Canada: National Cancer Institute of Canada.
Chamot, E., & Perneger, T. V. (2002): Men’s and women’s knowledge and perceptions of breast cancer and mammography screening. Preventive Medicine, 34, 380-385.
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. (1985): Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological bulletin, 98, 310-357.
Coughlin, S. S., & Uhler, R. J. (2002): Breast and cervical cancer screening practice among Hispanic women in the United States and Puerto Rico, 1998-1999. Preventive Medicine, 34, 242-251.
Fidell, L. S. & Tabachnick, B. G. (1996). Using multivariate statistics(3rd ed). Harper Collins College Publishers.
Fischer, C.S. (1982): To Dwell Among Friends. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fung, Suk-Yee. (1998): Factors associated with breast self-examination behavior among Chinese women in Hong Kong. Patient Education and Counseling. 33(3). 233-243.
Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K., ＆ Lewis, F. M., (Eds). (1995): Health behavior and health education(3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Goksen, F. (2002): Normative vs. attitudinal considerations in breastfeeding behavior: multifaceted social influences in a developing country context. Social science & medicine. 54, 1743-1753.
Gottieb, B.H. (1983) : Social support strategies: Guidelines for mental health practice. Beverly Hill: Sage.
Greene, B. (1992): Breast cancer: unanswered question. Ottawa: Standing Committee on Health and Welfare, Social Affairs, Seniors and the Status of Women—Subcommittee on the Status of Women, 1992.
House, J. S. (1982): Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
House, J. S., & Kahh, R. L. (1985): Measure and Concepts of social support. 83-108 in Social support and health, editor by S.Cohen and S.L. Syme. Orlando, FL: Academic press.
House, J. S., Umberson, D., & Landis, K. R. (1988): Structures and processes of social support. Annual review of sociology, 14, 293-318.
Huckfeldt, R.R. (1983): Social contexts, social networks, and urban neighborhoods: Environmental constraints on friendship choice. American Journal of Sociology, 89(3), 651-669.
Israel, B. A. (1982): Social networks and health status: linking theory, research, and practice. Patient counseling and health education, 4, 65-79.
Israel, B. A. & Rounds, K. A. (1987): Social networks and social support: a synthesis for health educators. Advances in health education and promotion, 2, 311-351.
Krause, N. (1995): Assessing stress-buffering effects: a cautionary note. Psychology and aging, 10, 518-526.
Marsden, P. V. (1992). Social network theory. In Edgar F. Borgatta & Marie L. Borgatta (EDs), Encyclopedia of Sociology, 14, 1887-1894.
McLeroy, K. R., Gottlieb, N. H., & Heaney, C. A. (2001). Social health. In M. P. O’Donnell and J. S. Harris (eds.), Health promotion in the workplace. (3rd ed.) Albany, N. Y.: Delmar.
McMahon, S. D., & Jason, L. A. (2000): Social support in a worksite smoking intervention. A test of theoretical models. Behavior modification. 24(2), 184-201.
Mitchell, J.C. (1969). The concept and use of social network. In J.C.Mitchell(Ed.), Social networks in urban situation. Manchester :University Press.
Montague, L. (1988): Job maintainance for special needs adolescents. Illinois school journal. 67(2), 31-36.
Straughan, P. T., & Seow, A. (2000): Attitudes as barriers in breast screening: a prospective study among Singapore women. Social Science and medicine, 51, 1695-1703.
Strogatz, D. S., (1997): Social support, stress, and blood pressure in black adults. Epidemiology, 8, 482-487.
Suarez, L., Ramirez, A. G., Villarreal, R., Marti, J., McAlister, A., Talavera, G. A., ed al. (2000). Social networks and cancer screening in four U.S. Hispanic Groups. Am J Prev Med, 19(1): 47-52.
Terborg, J. R., Hibbard, J., & Glasgow, R. E. (1995): Behavior change at the worksite: does social support make a difference? Am J Health Promo. 10(2), 125-131.
Tessaro, I. A., Taylor, S., Belton, L., Campbell, M. K., Benedict, S., Kelsey, K., et al. (2000): Adapting a natural (lay) helpers model of change for worksite health promotion for women. Health Educ Res. 15(5), 603-614.
Thoits, P. A. (1995): Stress, coping, and social support procession: Where are we? What next? Journal of health and social behavior. 36(5), 53-79.
Tolsdorf, C. C. （1976）: Social networks, social support, and coping: An exploratory study. Family process. 15(4), 407-417.
Tominaga, S., & Tetsuo K. (1995): Epidemiology of breast cancer in Japan. Cancer Letters, 90(1), 75-79.
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1997): State and sex-specific prevalence of selected characteristics-- Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1994 and 1995. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 46(SS03), 1-29.
U.S. National Cancer Institute (2003a), What you need to know about breast cancer. (2003/7/4)。網址：http://www.cancer.gov/cancerinfo/
wyntk/breast
U.S. National Cancer Institute (2003b). Mammogram: Not just once, butfor a lifetime. (2003/7/4)。網址：http://www.cancer.gov/
cancer_information/doc.aspx?viewid=946804B6-8B6F-4CD4-B692-ED7169EB73C9
Verbrugge, L. M. (1977): The structure of adult friendship choices. Social Forces, 56(2), 576-597.
Zapka, J. G., Stoddard, A. M., Costanza, M. E., & Greene, H. L. (1989): Breast cancer screening by mammography: Utilization and associated factors. AJPH, 79(11), 1499-1502.