簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林郁阡
Lin, Yu-Chien
論文名稱: 華語線上互動新手教師提問研究
A Study of Novice Teachers' Questioning in Online Interaction
指導教授: 曾金金
Tseng, Chin-Chin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 華語文教學系
Department of Chinese as a Second Language
論文出版年: 2016
畢業學年度: 104
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 156
中文關鍵詞: 華語教學教師提問線上互動
英文關鍵詞: Chinese teaching, Teacher questioning, online interaction
DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202203732
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:253下載:27
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 教師提問是教學過程中不可或缺的一個環節,同時也是展開師生互動的第一步。它不僅給學生產出語言提供了機會,也能啟發學生思考。不同提問的方式、不同質量的提問、或者不同提問的類型與形式,對學生的學習效果和參與課堂的積極性都有著相當程度的影響。如果教師提問不恰當,可能會導致學生失去參與課堂的興趣,大大降低課堂教學的效率。有鑒於教師提問在課堂教學中的重要性,本論文以實際課堂教學為主軸,並針對五位華語教師在線上互動中的提問進行了深入研究與探討,以探討提問與教學之間的關係與其運用方式對於教學成效的重要性與影響。
    本研究透過線上教學影片觀察五位新手教師提問的類型、提問的形式、以及提問後給予學生的反饋等方面作了統計與分析。依研究結果顯示:一、教師最常使用的問題類型是知識性問題,而較少使用推理性問題;二、在問題形式上,教師大量使用特指問句,而較少使用選擇問句;三、在反饋方式上,教師對學生採取了簡單積極反饋,以表揚為主。同時教師也會給予兩種不同類型的反饋,最常使用的是簡單積極反饋加重複。本研究同時也採用線上問卷調查方式,以華語教師與國立台灣師範大學之研究生作為研究對象,並請該對象評估五位新手教師提問成效。從提問有效性問卷中的結果顯示新手教師提問較偏向於無效,其影響無效的原因包括缺乏經驗與實務訓練、本身對語言的知識不足等問題。最後本研究依據研究結果提出一些結論供華語教師以及師資培育機構作為參考。

    Teachers’ question is an essential part of classroom discourse and is also the first step to develop the interaction between teachers and students. Teacher’s questioning does not only help to elicit student’s language output, but also stimulate student’s thinking and learning. Different types of questions and different ways of asking questions has important implications on the effect of students’ enthusiasm in learning and participating in class. If a teacher utilize question ineffectively, students will not be interested in learning and may become less motivated to participate in class. Therefore, teachers’ questioning play an important role in classroom and it is a matter worthy of academic attention.
    In this study, a Chinese as a second language teacher’s questions were classified.
    The data was collected through observation of five novice teacher’s questioning in synchronous distance instruction. Three aspects of teachers’ questioning including question types, question form, and feedback was analyzed. After analyzing the obtained data, it was found that knowledge question, among different question types, was the the most frequently posed questions, and inference question is the least frequently used question type. As for teachers’ questioning form, the most frequently used is wh-questions and the least frequently used is disjoined questions. Last, it was found that positive feedback such as praise is the main feedback form of teachers. Teachers would also give more than one form of feedback and the most frequently used is praise and repetition. Furthermore, the data was also collected through questionnaire. The questionnaire is tended for Chinese language teachers and graduate students who major in Teaching Chinese as a Second Language as a means to provide feedback regarding to the five teacher’s questioning in online teaching. The questionnaire was calculated to evaluate the effectiveness of teacher’s questioning and the feedback was analyzed using descriptive narratives. The result of the questionnaire shows that the teachers’ questionings are mostly ineffective due to a lack of experience in questioning, teachers’ knowledge appears to be insufficient, etc. Finally, the result of this study proposes a conclusion and provide some suggestions to teacher’s questioning.

    目錄.......................................................i 表目錄....................................................iii 圖目錄.....................................................iv 第一章 緒論.................................................1 第一節 前言.................................................1 第二節 研究動機與目的.........................................2 第三節 研究問題..............................................3 第四節 重要名詞釋義...........................................3 第五節 研究架構..............................................4 第二章 文獻探討..............................................5 第一節 遠距教學..............................................5 一、遠距教學之發展............................................5 二、遠距教學意義與特質........................................6 三、互動之重要性.............................................7 第二節 主要理論基礎..........................................7 一、Krashen輸入假設理論 (Input hypothesis)...................8 二、Long 互動假說 (Long’s Interaction Hypothesis)...........9 三、Swain輸出假設 (Output Hypothesis)......................10 第三節 提問................................................11 一、提問之意義..............................................11 二、提問之功能..............................................12 三、提問之類型..............................................13 四、提問之形式..............................................19 五、教師反饋................................................20 第四節 教師提問之相關研究.....................................25 第三章 研究方法.............................................27 第一節 研究流程.............................................27 第二節 研究對象.............................................28 第三節 資料蒐集方法 ..........................................31 一、課堂觀察................................................31 二、問卷調查................................................31 第四節 研究工具.............................................31 第五節 資料處理與分析........................................33 第六節 研究的信度與效度......................................35 第四章 研究結果.............................................37 第一節 華語教師線上互動之提問分析..............................37 一、教師與學生提問總體數量之比較...............................37 二、教師在不同階段提問之比較..................................39 三、教師提問類型調查結果.....................................40 四、教師提問形式調查結果.....................................51 五、教師反饋方式調查結果.....................................58 第二節 線上互動成效評估結果與分析.............................73 一、評估者之基本資料........................................74 二、教師提問有效評估問卷調查結果..............................75 三、觀察小節...............................................93 第五章 結論與建議...........................................97 第一節 研究總結.............................................97 第二節 教學建議.............................................98 第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議................................100 參考文獻..................................................101 附錄.....................................................105 附錄一、線上互動華語教師背景問卷..............................105 附錄二、學習者背景問卷......................................106 附錄三、新手教師提問回饋意見問卷..............................107 附錄四、逐字稿.............................................114 表二-1布魯姆的問題分類系統...................................16 表二-2 不同學者的問題分類系統之比較...........................16 表三-1線上華語教師背景資料...................................28 表三-2學習者背景資料........................................29 表三-3線上教材內容..........................................30 表四-2 教師提問類型使用的數量及所占比例(%).....................40 表四-3 教師問題形式使用的數量及所占比例(%).....................51 表四-4 教師反饋使用的數量及所占比例(%)........................58 表四-5 單一型反饋和混合型反饋使用的數量及所占比例(%).............59 表四-6 教師反饋類型.........................................59 表四-7 教師單一型反饋語的使用的數量及所占比例(%).................60 表四-8 教師混合型反饋語的使用數量比例及所占比例(%)...............70 表四-9 評估者之基本資料......................................74 表四-10 第一題提問有效性問卷統計結果...........................77 表四-11 第二題提問有效性問卷統計結果...........................80 表四-12 第三題提問有效性問卷統計結果...........................84 表四-13 第四題提問有效性問卷統計結果...........................88 表四-14 第五題問有效性問統計卷統計結果.........................91 圖二-1 靳洪剛提問功能分類系統.................................15 圖三-1 研究流程圖...........................................27 圖三-2 ChineseVid影片觀賞頁面...............................30 圖三-3 Adobe Connect上課介面................................32 圖四-1 教師與學生提問總次數之統計果............................37 圖四-2 T2教師在不同階段提問使用之比較..........................39 圖四-3 T4教師線上教學畫面....................................45 圖四-4 T2教師線上教學畫面....................................46 圖四-5 T3教師詞彙教學影片之畫面...............................75 圖四-6 T2教師課文討論教學影片之畫面............................79 圖四-7 T5教師詞彙教學影片之畫面...............................82 圖四-8 T4教師課文討論教學影片之畫面............................86 圖四-9「提問策略的提示功能」之流程圖...........................89 圖四-10 T1教師課文討論教學影片之畫面...........................90 圖四-11 新手教師提問成效總評分之比較...........................93

    馬欣華(1988)。課堂提問。世界漢語教學,第1期。
    顧建民(1986)。教師課堂提問的策略。上海教育科研,第6期。
    王文科(1990)。質的教育研究法。台北:五南。
    王莉玲(1993)。幼稚園實習教師發問技巧的分析。幼兒教育學報,2,35-60。
    陳慧君(1994)。個案研究-影響教師發問技巧的內素。國立師範大學生物學研究所碩士論文。
    陳嘉彌(1997)。網路互動式遠距教學策略之構想與其可行性。教學科技與體,34。
    劉曉雨(2000)。提問在對外漢語課堂教學中的運用。世界漢語教學,第1期,頁73-74。
    趙美聲、陳姚真(譯)(2002)。Michale G.Moore, Greg Kearsley著。遠距教育:系統觀(Distance education:a systems view)。高雄市:麗文文化。
    張玉成(2004)。教師發問技巧。臺北: 心理。
    靳洪剛(2004)。中文教師提問能力的培訓。Journal of the Chinese language Teachers association ,39(3),29-50。
    靳洪剛(2005)。第二語言習得與語言形式為中心的結構教學探討。二十一世紀華語機構營運策略教學國際研討會論文及。台北:師大。
    蔡建豐(2005)。針對英語母語者學習漢語疑問句的習得研究。雲南師範大學學報,第6期。
    張凌坤(2006)。大學英語教師提問存在的問題及其解決策略。山東外語教學,第2期。
    杜朝暉、元華(2007)。中級漢語會話課堂提問類型研究。雲南師範大學學報,第6期。
    沈俊毅(譯)(2007)。遠距教學與學習-遠距教育的基礎。(Teaching and learning at a distance:foundations of distance education) M. Simonson等著。台北市:心理出版社。
    匡臘英 (2008)。對外漢語教學中的課堂提問策略。現代語文,第11期。
    陳昭錦、譚克平(2009)。科學探究取向教學中的教師提問與回饋。教育曙光,第1期,81-94。
    丁雪歡(2010)。漢語疑問句作為第二語言習得的研究。中國社會科學出版社。
    林正軍、周沙(2011)。中學英語課堂教師反饋語的類型與特徵研究。外語教學理論與實踐,第4期。
    陳純音(2011)。第二語言課室研究。台北:正中書局。
    許莉,黃雅穎(2014)。基於語料庫的糾錯性反饋。重慶理工大學學報,第2期,頁94。
    張敬科(2014)。如何運用教師反饋語展開對外漢語教學。安陽工學院學報。第5期。
    Bloom, Benjamin S.(ed.)(1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Cognitive Domain.New York: David McKay Company,Inc.
    Barnes, D., Britton, J. & Rosen, H. (1969) Language, the Learner and the School. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    Barnes, C.P. (1979). Questioning strategies to develop critical thinking skills. Paper presented at the meeting of the Claremont Reading Conference, Claremont, CA.
    Berlin,D.C.(1988). The Development of Expertise in Pedagogy. Charles W. Haunt Memorial Lecture presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of College for Teacher Education, New Orleans, LA.
    Brown, H Douglas.(2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Person Education.
    Carin,Arthur A.&Sund,Robert B.(1971).Developing Questioning Techniques(A Self-Concept Approach).Columbus,Ohio: Charles E.Merrill Publishing Company.
    Ellis,Rod.(1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.
    Hunkins,F.P.(1972) Questioning strategies and techniques. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Hyman,R.T.(1979). Strategic Questioning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
    JordahlG.(1989).Communications satellites: A rural response to the tyranny of distance.Education Technology,29(2),34-38.
    Krashen,S.(1985). The input hypothesis: issues and implication. London: Longman.
    Long、M. H.、& Sato、C. J. (1983).Classroom foreigner talk discourse: forms and functions of teachers’ questions. In H. W.Seliger & M. H.Long (Eds.)、Classroom Oriented Research in Second Language Acquisition (pp.268-285). Rowley: Newbury House.
    Nunan,David(1991) Language Teaching Methodology: a textbook for Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Steven, R.(1912) The Question as a Measure of Efficiency in Teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
    Swain,M. and Lapkin,S.(1995)Problems in Output and the Cognitive Processes They Generate:A Step Toward Language Learning. Applied Linguistics,16,371-391.
    Swain, M.(1985) Communicative competence.Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development.Gass,S.& M adden,C.(eds.)Input in second language acquisition. New York: Newbury House Publishers.
    Sinclair,J.M.,&Coulthard, R.M.(1975).Towards and analysis of discourse. London:Oxford University Press.
    Wilen,W.(1991). Questioning skills for teachers. What research says to the teacher.(3rd ed.)Washington,DC: National Education Association.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE