研究生: |
李倍締 Bei Di,Li |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
創造與批判思考融入教學對國中生之教學效果 The Effect on Junior High School Students from Integrating Creative Thinking and Critical Thinking into Teaching |
指導教授: |
陳學志
Chen, Hsueh-Chih |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
創造力發展碩士在職專班 Continuing Education Master's Program of Creativity Development |
論文出版年: | 2012 |
畢業學年度: | 100 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 103 |
中文關鍵詞: | 創造與批判思考融入教學 、批判思考 、創造思考 |
英文關鍵詞: | integrating critical thinking and creative thinking into teaching, critical thinking, creative thinking |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:264 下載:71 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在了解「創造與批判思考融入教學」對國中生之教學效果。研究對象為臺北市某國中9年級8個班級的學生,共計265人,其中男147人,女118人。實驗設計採用「不等組前後測準實驗設計」,共區分成三組,分別為實驗組1:「創造與批判思考融入教學」、實驗組2:「創造思考融入教學」及控制組:「一般教學」,前兩組各3個班級,控制組2個班級。研究工具為「新編創造思考測驗」及「批判思考測驗-第一級」。所得資料以單因子共變數分析(oneway-ANCOVA)檢驗研究假設。研究結果如下:
1.「創造與批判思考融入教學」比「創造思考教學」、「一般教學」更能提升國中生的批判思考能力及創造思考能力。
2.「創造與批判思考融入教學」與「創造思考融入教學」兩種不同教學方法,對國中生創造思考能力提升的效果有差異。此兩種不同教學方法對國中生語文流暢力、語文變通力之提升效果沒有差異,但對語文獨創力之提升效果,前者大致優於後者;兩種不同教學方法對國中生圖形流暢力、圖形變通力、圖形精進力之提升效果沒有差異,但對圖形獨創力之提升效果,前者大致優於後者。
The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect on junior high school students from integrating creative thinking and critical thinking into teaching. Samples are selected from eight classes of 9th grade students in the same school in Taipei. The total valid samples are at the number 265 students, including 147 males and 118 females. Based on the design of “quasi-experimental model comparing pre-testing group and post-testing control group,” the experiment is divided into three groups which are experimental group 1: “Application of Creative Thinking and Critical Thinking to Teaching,” experimental group 2: “Application of Creative Thinking to Teaching,” and control group: “Regular Teaching.” In this experiment, experimental group 1 and group 2 are both composed of three classes. The control group is composed of two classes as well. Throughout the study, “Newly Revised Creative Thinking Tests” and “Critical Thinking Test- Level 1” will be the main tools. Dependent one-way analysis of covariance (one-way ANCOVA) is used to analyze the obtained data. The results are as follows:
1.“Application of Creative Thinking and Critical Thinking to Teaching” is better than “Application of Creative Thinking to Teaching” and “Regular Teaching” in enhancing students' critical thinking abilities along with creative thinking abilities.
2.These two different teaching methods which are “Application of Creative Thinking and Critical Thinking to Teaching” and “Application of Creative Thinking to Teaching” have shown differences in enhancing junior high school students' creative thinking abilities. There are no differences to the effect in fluency and flexibility of creative thinking with word tests to junior high school students, but the former is generally superior to the latter in enhancing the effect in originality of creative thinking with word tests. Picture tests also shown no different effects in fluency, flexibility, and elaboration of creative thinking with junior high school students, but the former is generally superior to the latter to the effect in originality of creative thinking with picture tests.
中文部分
毛連塭(1984)。臺北市國民小學推展創造性體育課程實驗報告。「臺北市國民小學推展創造性教學研討會」發表之論文,臺北市教師研習中心。
王克先(1987)。學習心理學。臺北:桂冠。
王秋絨(1991)。批判思考教育在我國教育實習制度規劃上的意義。臺北:師大書苑。
江芳盛(1990)。高雄市國民小學教師批判思考教學行為之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺灣師範大學,臺北。
江碧蓉(2009)。國中歷史科之批判思考教學實驗(未出版之碩士論文)。屏東科技大學,屏東。
江麗美(譯)(1985)。六頂思考帽。(原作者:De Bono, Edward)。臺北,桂冠圖書。(原著出版年:1985)
何偉雲、葉錦燈(2003)。RAT-like測驗中的發散性思考分析。科學教育學刊,11(2),195-210。
吳文龍、黃萬居(2007)。自然科創意與批判思考教學對國小學生學習動機、批判思考及科學創造力之研究。科學教育月刊,304,12-28。
吳靜吉(總編輯)(2005)。教育部創造力教育中程發展計畫-Creative Partnerships-創意伙伴計畫【專刊】。創造力雙月刊,10。
吳靜吉、陳甫彥、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、陳玉樺(1998)。教育部輔導工作六年計劃研究報告-新編創造思考測驗研究。臺北:教育部。
李宛諭(2005)。隱喻模式應用於國中資優生高層次思考教學成效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。彰化師範大學,彰化。
李幸模(1981)。培養創造力。臺北:遠流。
沈家平(2002)。STS模式教學對學生批判思考能力之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。臺灣師範大學,臺北。
周建志(2010)。批判思考教學方案對國民中學資優生批判思考能力提昇之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。彰化師範大學,彰化。
林玉体(2002)。美國高等教育之發展。臺北市:高等教育。
林幸台、陳明終、黃美玉(1985)。創造力訓練對國小資優兒童創造力與高層次認知能力之影響。資優教育季刊,17,28-31。
林苡萱(2008)。議題中心教學法對國二學生批判思考能力之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。高雄師範大學,高雄。
林清山(2009)。心理與教育統計學。臺北:東華。
林碧芳、邱皓政(2004年2月)。中小學教師創造人格特質、創意教學自我效能感與創意教學之關係-結構方程模式的路徑分析。「第二屆創新與創造力研討會」發表之論文,臺北市政治大學創新與創造力教育研究中心。
林緯倫、連韻文、任純慧(2005)。想得多是想得好的前提嗎?探討發散性思考 能力在創意問題解決的角色。中華心理學刊,47(3),211-227。
邱發忠(2005)。創造力認知運作機制之探究(未出版之博士論文)。臺灣師範大學,臺北。
洪愷琪(2007)。以電腦科技結合批判思考教學─以國中地理教學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。嘉義大學,嘉義。
洪瑀捷(2006)。網路輔助議題中心教學提升國中生批判思考能力之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。東華大學,花蓮。
紀淑琴(1997)。「思考性寫作教學方案」對國中生寫作能力、後設認知、批判思考及創造思考影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺灣師範大學,臺北。
韋雅寧(2010)。國中生讀報教育與批判思考能力之實驗研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺灣師範大學,臺北。
原來(1996)。腦力激盪術徹底應用。臺北,林鬱。
高橋浩(1990)。突發奇想。臺北,卓越。
張玉成(總編輯)。(1999)。教師發問技巧之外:論鼓勵學生發問暨教師回答技巧之重要性【專刊】。國民教育,3期。
張世彗(2003)。創造力—理論、技術/技法與培育。臺北:張世彗。
張玉燕(2002)。批判思考教學探討。初等教育學刊,12,211-246。
張盈榛(2006)。培育中等教育職前教師批判思考教學能力之教學模式探討(未出版之碩士論文)。成功大學,臺南。
教育部(2002)。創造力教育白皮書。臺北:教育部。
教育部(2004a)。創意臺灣、全球佈局—培育各盡其才新國民。臺北:教育部。
教育部(2004b)。創造力教育中程綱要計畫。臺北:教育部。
莊淇銘(2004)。就是要你學會創意。臺北市:天下遠見。
郭旭展(2007)。臺灣創造力教育之指標建構與執行成效評估(未出版之碩士論文)。中山大學,高雄。
郭有遹(1977)。創造心理學。臺北:正中。
陳正昌(1997)。從態度層面談教師批判思考的內涵與精神。教育研究,57,48-54。
陳伯璋、張盈堃(2006)解放的場所與實踐:批判教育學的關懷。教育研究,146,5-19。
陳玲萱(2005)。批判思考在藝術鑑賞教學上的應用:一個文獻的初探。藝術教育研究,9,115-141。
陳密桃(1995)。我國臺灣地區國中學生批判思考的相關因素及其教學效果之分析研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:NSC83-0301-H017-003),未出版。
陳萩卿(2000)。批判思考教學策略運用在國小五年級社會科之實驗研究(未出版之碩士論文)。政治大學,臺北。
陳儀璇(1996)。國中補校成人學生批判思考之研究。社會教學學刊,25,253-272。
陳龍安(2006)。創造思考教學的理論與實際。臺北:心理。
陳膺宇(1994)。批判性思考運動之初探。國立政治大學學報,69,141-171。
黃秋敏(2004)。國小學童創造思考與批判思考在科學問題解決歷程中之關聯性研究(未出版之碩士論文)。屏東師範學院,屏東。
黃鳳雀(1997)。國中家政科應用批判思考教學之實驗研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺灣師範大學,臺北。
黃麗蓉(2001)。資訊科技融入國中歷史批判思考教學方案之探究(未出版之碩士論文)。中山大學,高雄。
新加坡教育部(1998)。Learning to Think, Thinking to Learn:Toward Thinking Schools, Learning Nation。新加坡,作者。
溫明麗(1997)。批判思考教學。教育研究,55,49-54。
溫明麗(2002)。皮亞傑與批判性思考教學。臺北:洪葉。
葉玉珠(1991)。我國中小學生批判思考及其相關之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。政治大學,臺北。
葉玉珠(1998)。有效批判思考教學的基礎之探討。教育研究雙月刊,59,57-64。
葉玉珠(1999)。代理(課)教師批判思考教學專業知識、個人教學效能及教學行為之現況及關係之研究。國立政治大學學報,78,55-84。
葉玉珠(2000)。智能與批判思考。國立中山大學社會科學季刊,2(1),1-28。
葉玉珠(2002)。高層次思考教學設計的要素分析。國立中山大學通識教育學報,1,75-101。
葉玉珠(2003)。「批判思考技巧測驗-第一級」指導手冊。臺北:心理。
葉玉珠、葉碧玲、謝佳蓁(2000)。中小學批判思考技巧測驗之發展。測驗年刊,47,27-46。
董奇(1995)。兒童創造力發展心理。臺北:五南。
廖偉伶(2010)。融入批判思考於社會領域之行動研究-以七年級日治時期、戰後臺灣為例(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北教育大學,臺北。
潘裕豐(1992)。國小批判思考教學效果之實驗研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺灣師範大學,臺北。
劉雅筑(2000)。國中學生批判思考、創造思考、閱讀理解策略與閱讀理解成就之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。高雄師範大學,高雄。
蔡淑君(2009)。國中理化老師的數理課程統整觀(未出版之博士論文)。彰化師師範大學,彰化。
蔡瑞玲(2007)。批判思考融入公民科WebQuest教學方案之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。中山大學,高雄。
鄭英耀(1992)。國小教師創造思考、批評思考及其相關因素之研究(未出版之博士論文)。政治大學,臺北。
鄭英耀,葉玉珠(2000)。批判思考教學效果之研究。國立中山大學社會科季刊,2(1),127-142。
鍾冬玉(2002)。國中公民科實施批判思考教學之實證研究(未出版之碩士論文)。中山大學,高雄。
魏美惠(1999)。批判思考能力之探討。臺灣師範大學特殊教育中心資優季刊,70,10-15。
蘇明勇、黃萬居(2006)。蘇格拉底詰問模式對六年級學生批判思考能力與傾向之影響。科學教育學刊,14(5),597-614。
西文部分
Adler, M. J. (1986). A guidebook to learning: for the lifelong pursuit of wisdom. New York: Macmillan.
Basadur, M. S., Rraen, G. B., & Gree, S. G. (1982). Traning in creative problem solving: effects on ideation and problem finding in an allied research organization. Organizational behavior and Human Performance, 30, 41-70.
Bayer, B. K. (1997). Improving student thinking: a comprehensive approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Berman,S. (2001) . Thinking in context: teaching for open-mindedness and critical understanding. In A. L. Costa (Ed.)(2001), Developing minds, a resource book for teaching thinking. Alexandria: ASCD.
Beyer, B. K. (1988). Developing a thinking skills course: Handbook. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Brookfield, S. D. (1987). Developing critical thinkers: challenging adults to explore alternative ways of thinking and actung. SanFransisco: Jossey–Bass.
Buzan, T. (2001). Use your head. London: BBC Worldwide Limited.
Carroll, R. J. (1981). An examination of conceptual problems in teaching critical thinking in social studies education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), North Carolina University at Chapel Hill, Carolina.
Clapham, M. M. (2001). The effects of affect manipulation and information exposure on divergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 335-350.
Crawford, R. P. (1954). The techniques of creative thinking. NY: Hawthorn.
Eberle, B. (1982). Visual think: a "SCAMPER" tool for useful imaging. New York: D.O.K.publisher.
Edward Glassman, Ph. D. (1991). Creative handbook: shift paradigms & harvest creative thinking at work. USA: The LCS Press.
Ennis, R. H. (1962), A concept of critical thinking. Harvard Educational Review, 32(l), 88-111.
Ennis, R. H. (1985). A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational Leadership, 43(2), 45-48.
Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society.New York: Norton. Ennis, R. H. (1962). A concept of critical thinking: a proposed basis for research in the teaching and evaluation of critical thinking ability. Harvard Education Review, 32 (1), 297-310.
Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992).Creative cognition: theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Garrison, D. R. (1991). Critical thinking and adult education: a conceptual model for developing critical thinking in adult learners. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 10(4), 287-303.
Gordon, W. J. (1961). Synectics. New York: Macmillan.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American psychologist, 9, 444-454.
Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267-293.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Guilford, J. P. (1968). Intelligence, creativity and their educational implications. San Diego, CA:Robert R. Knapp.
Hannel, G. I., & Hannel, L. (1998). Seven steps to teach critical thing. The Education Digest, 64(1), 47-51
Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1995). Mental leaps. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/ MIT Press.
Holyoak, K. J., Gentner, D., & Kokinov, B. N. (2001). Instroduction: the place of analogy in cognition. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind (pp.1-19) . London: MIT Press.
Johnson, A. (2001). How to use thinking skills to differentiate curricular for gifted and highly creative students. Gifted Child Today, 24(4), 58-65.
Joyce, B. & Weil, M. (1992). Models of teaching.(3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kurfman, D. (1967). The evaluation of effective thinking. In J. Fair & F. R. Shaftel (Eds.), Effective thinking in the social studies : 37th yearbook (pp. 231-253). Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies, a Department of the National Education Association.
LeBoeuf, M. (1980). Creative thinking. London: Judy Piatkus Ltd.
Lipman, M. (1984). The cultivation of reasoning through philosophy. Educational leadership, 42(1), 51-56.
McPeck, J. E. (1981). Critical thinking and education. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
McPeck, J. E. (1990). Teaching critical thinking: dialogue and dialectic. New York and London: Routledge.
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232.
Milgram, R. N. (1990). Creativity: an idea whose time has come and gone? In M. A. Runco, & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 215-233). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Nierenberg, G. I. (1982). The art of creative thinking. New York: Barnes and Noble.
Norris, S. P. & Ennis, R. H. (1989). Evaluating critical thinking. CA: Midwest Publications.
Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination: principles and procedures of creative thinking. New York: Scribners.
Osborn, A. F. (1963). Applied imagination 3rd Ed.. New York: Scribners.
Parnes, S. J. (1967). Creative behavior guidebook. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Parness, S. J., Noller, R. B., & Biondi, A. M. (1977). Guide to creative action. New York: Scribner.
Paul, R. W. (1990) . Critical thinking in north America. In A. J. Binker(Ed.) , Critical thinking: what every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world (pp. 18-43). Rohnert Park, CA: Sonoma University Press.
Paul, R. W. (1995). Critical thinking: how to prepare students for a rapidly changing world. Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Piaget, J. (1929). Child’s conception of the world. Harcourt, N.Y.: Brace.
Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 35-61). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Resnick, L. B. (2001). Making America smarter: the real goal of school reform. In A. L. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds, a resource book for teaching thinking. Alexandria: ASCD.
Ruggiero, V. R. (1988). The art of thinking: a guide to critical and creative thought. New York: Harper & Row.
Runco, M. A., & Okuda, S. M. (1988). Problem finding, divergent thinking, and the creative process. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 17, 211-220.
Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (1990). Theories of creativity. Newbury Park CA: Sage Publication.
Siegel, H. (1980). Critical thinking as an educational ideal. Educational forum, 4, 7-23.
Siegel, H. (1988). Educating reason: rationality, critical thinking, and education. New York: Routledge Chapman & Hall.
Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (1995). Cognitive processes in creative contexts. In Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 1-8). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Starko, A. J. (2000). Creativity in the classroom: school in the curious delight. NJ: LEA.
Swanson, H. L., Chustie, L., & Rubadlau, R. J. (1993). The relationship between meta cognition and analogical reasoning in mentally retarded, learning disabled, and gifted children. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 8(2), 70-81.
Swartz, R. J.; Parks, S. (1994). Infusing critical and creative thinking into content instruction. Pacific Grove, CA: Critical Thinking Press & Software.
Thompson, A. L., & Klatzky, R. L. (1978). Studies of visual synthesis: integration of fragments into forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 244-263.
Torrance, E. P. (1972). Predictive validity of the Torrance Tests of creative thinking. Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 236-252.
Walsh, D. & Paul, R. W. (1986). The goal of critical thinking: form education ideal to educational reality. Washington DC: American Federation of Teachers, Educational
Watlers, K. S. (1986). Critical thinking in liberal education: a case of overkill? Liberal Education, 72(3), 233-244.