簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 顏欣柔
Yen, Hsin-Jou
論文名稱: 外籍助教對英語學習之影響:以台灣學童為例
The Impact of English Teaching Assistants on English Learning in Taiwan
指導教授: 吳美貞
Wu, Mei-Chen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2016
畢業學年度: 104
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 133
中文關鍵詞: 態度動機外籍助教本國老師協同教學英語學習者
英文關鍵詞: Attitude, Motivation, English Teaching Assistants (ETAs), Local English Teachers (LETs), Co-teaching, EFL learners
DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202205041
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:249下載:51
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討外籍助教對台灣學童的英語學習之影響,主要是為了研究:台灣學童在學年初及學年末的英語學習態度、外籍助教(ETA)在學年初及學年末對於學生的英語學習態度的看法、本國英文老師(LET)在學年初及學年末對於學生的英語學習態度的看法和外籍助教如何影響學生在教室內的學習動機。
    參與本研究的受試者來自台灣六個地區:台北、宜蘭、台東、高雄、台中和金門。此研究參與的受試者包含4056位學生(10-13歲學生)、149位老師(56外籍助教和93本國英文老師)。受試者必須填寫一份態度與動機問卷來測量學生的英語學習態度。針對學生及老師所填寫的問卷進行交叉分析,可得知學生在學年初及學年末的英語學習態度的概況。最後,透過訪問和課室觀察來提供學生動機與態度更多的資訊,並且深入了解學習情境、教師的角色、特定的文化主題,以及對於學生動機與態度具影響力的教學策略。
    本研究分析結果如下:第一,學生有正面的英語學習態度,且能看出學生的英語學習態度在學年末相較於學年初有明顯的進步。第二,老師相信學生有正面的英語學習態度。老師們都相信學生的學習動機與態度皆在學年末提升,而從態度與動機問卷來看,外籍助教在學年初給的分數比本國英文老師還要低,究其原因在於不同的老師對於學生的熟悉程度、看法、文化背景、學習經驗及對於台灣的教育體系的了解程度不同。第三,從訪問和課室觀察可見外籍助教對於以下面向的影響:課堂氣氛之改變、老師們以及學生的互動、文化交流以及視野拓寬(全球化)。
    最後,根據本研究結果,祈使未來研究者及英文老師以此為基礎,更進一步探究學生的英語學習態度在外籍助教指導之下的具體變化,並深入探析外籍助教如何影響學生學習態度、動機之改變。

    This study aimed to investigate the impact of English Teaching Assistants (ETA) on young Taiwanese learners’ English learning in Taiwan. Research questions were designed to examine: young Taiwanese learners’ perception of their motivation in the beginning and at the end of the school year, the English Teaching Assistants’ (ETAs’) perception of their learners’ motivation in the beginning and at the end of the school year, the Local English Teachers’ (LETs’) perception of their learners’ motivation in the beginning and at the end of the school year, and how the ETAs influence their learners’ motivation towards English learning in class.
    The participants were learners and teachers (ETAs and LETs) from six areas: Taipei, Yilan, Taitung, Kaohsiung, Taichung, and Kinmen. 4056 young Taiwanese learners (ranging from 10-13 years old), 149 teachers (56 ETAs and 93 LETs) participated in this study. An attitude and motivation questionnaire was employed to assess the learners’ attitude and motivation towards English learning with the presence of the ETAs at the beginning and end of the school year. The teachers (both ETAs and LETs) were also asked to complete an attitude and motivation questionnaire based on their perception of their learners’ attitude and motivation towards English learning. Cross tabulation was utilized to analyze the learners’ and teachers’ questionnaires, examining the general idea of all the learners’ attitude and motivation, and the teachers’ perception of their learners’ attitude and motivation. Finally, interviews and classroom observations were conducted to explore a more in-depth understanding of learners’ attitude and motivation towards English learning, and the impact of ETAs on learners throughout the school year.
    The results can be summarized as follows. First, the cross tabulation showed that the learners’ attitude and motivation, in general, were positive, and that there was an increase in their attitude and motivation from the pretest to the posttest. Second, from the cross tabulation, the teachers (both ETAs and LETs), in general, perceived their learners’ to have a positive attitude and high motivation towards English learning with the presence of ETAs. Even though there was also an increased number of teachers’ (both ETAs’ and LETs’) who perceived their learners to have a positive attitude and high motivation in the posttest, the ETAs had given lower scores in the questionnaires at the beginning of the year compared to the LETs. This difference in perception between the ETAs and LETs may be explained by the teachers’ familiarity with learners, teachers’ different views, teachers’ different cultural contexts and educational experiences, and their knowledge of Taiwan’s educational system. Third, the interviews and classroom observations showed the impact of ETAs on the learners in the following areas: change of classroom atmosphere, interaction between teachers and learners, cultural exchanges, and broadening of perspectives (globalization).
    At last, based on the findings of this study, pedagogical implications are offered for future researchers and English teachers, hoping to shed light on the learners’ English learning attitude and motivation with the presence and the impact of English Teaching Assistants on young EFL learners in Taiwan.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS 摘要 i ABSTRACT iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v LIST OF TABLES x LIST OF FIGURES xi CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Motivation and Background 1 1.2 Rationale and Scope of the Study 3 1.3 Research Gap 4 1.4 Research Questions 6 1.5 Organization of the Study 6 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 7 2.1 Motivation and Attitude 7 2.2 Co-teaching 9 2.3 Factors Influencing Motivation 10 CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY 14 3.1 Research Design 14 3.2 Participants 16 Learners 16 Teachers 16 3.3 Data Collection Procedures 17 Questionnaires: The Attitude/Motivation Test Battery (AMTB) 17 Interviews 19 Classroom Observations 19 Field Notes 20 3.4 Procedures of the Study 20 3.5 Data Analysis 21 Quantitative Analysis 21 Qualitative Analysis 22 CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 23 4.1 Quantitative Results 23 Summary of Learners’ Findings 29 Summary of Teachers’ Findings 44 4.2 Qualitative Results 46 Impact of ETAs on Learners’ Motivation 46 Summary 66 CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION 71 5.1 Summary of the Findings 71 5.2 Pedagogical Implications 73 5.3 Limitations of the Study 75 5.4 Suggestions for Future Research 76 REFERENCES 78 APPENDIXES 89 Appendix A: Explanation of the Final Version of the AMTB 89 Appendix B: A Questionnaire on Learners’ Motivation toward English Learning with the Presence of ETAs (Learners) 94 Appendix C: A Questionnaire of Teachers’ Perception on Learners’ Motivation toward English Learning with the Presence of ETAs (ETAs) 95 Appendix D: A Questionnaire of Teachers’ Perception on Learners’ Motivation toward English Learning with the Presence of ETAs (LETs) 96 Appendix E: Pilot Test (Reliability Test) 97 Appendix F: Cross Tabulation Results of Learners’ Questionnaires 98 (Pretest & Posttest) 98 Appendix G: Cross Tabulation Results of LETs’ (nonNative) & 118 ETAs’ (Native) Questionnaires (Pretest & Posttest) 118 Appendix H: T-Test for Learners’ Questionnaires (Pretest & Posttest) 132 Appendix I: T-Test for ETAs & LETs Questionnaires (Pretest & Posttest) 133

    Abu‐Rabia, S. (2004). Teachers’ Role, Learners’ Gender Differences, and FL Anxiety Among Seventh‐Grade Students Studying English as a FL. Educational Psychology, 24(5), 711-721.
    Árva, V. & Medgyes, P. (2000). Native and non-native teachers in the classroom. System, 28, 355-372.
    Bamberger, M. (2012). Introduction to mixed methods in impact evaluation.Impact Evaluation Notes, 3, 1-38.
    Barratt, L., & Kontra, E. H. (2000). Native‐English‐Speaking Teachers in Cultures Other Than Their Own. TESOL journal, 9(3), 19-23.
    Batstone, R. (2002). Making sense of new language: A discourse perspective. Language Awareness, 11(1), 14-29.
    Bernaus, M., & Gardner, R. C. (2008). Teacher motivation strategies, student perceptions, student motivation, and English achievement. The Modern Language Journal, 92(3), 387-401.
    Blake, R. L. (1989). Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods in family research. Family Systems Medicine, 7(4), 411.
    Borg, S. (2006). The distinctive characteristics of foreign language teachers. Language Teaching Research, 10(1), 3-31.
    Braskamp, L. A. (2008). Developing global citizens. Journal of College and Character, 10(1).
    Brosh, H. (1996). Perceived characteristics of the effective language teacher. Foreign Language Annals, 29, 125-138.
    Buckley, F. (2000). Team Teaching: What, Why and How?. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Burstall, C. (1975). French in the primary school: the British experiment. Canadian Modern Language Review, 31, 388-402.
    Carless, D., & Walker, E. (2006). Effective team teaching between local and native-speaking English teachers. Language and Education, 20(6), 463–477.
    Chamber, G. N. (1999). Motivating language learners (Vol. 12). Multilingual Matters.
    Chern, C. (2003). English language teaching in Taiwan today. In W. K. Ho & R. Y. L. Wong (Eds.), English language teaching in East Asia today: Changing politics and practices (pp. 427-437). Singapore: Eastern Universities Press.
    Cheung, Y.L. (2002). The attitude of university students in Hong Kong towards native and non-native teachers of English. Unpublished Master Degree Thesis. The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
    Chun, S. Y. (2014). EFL learners' beliefs about native and non-native English-speaking teachers: perceived strengths, weaknesses, and preferences. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 35(6), 563-579.
    Cresswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. (2007). Mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Csizér, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The internal structure of language learning motivation and its relationship with language choice and learning effort. The Modern Language Journal, 89(1), 19-36.
    Csizér, K., Kormos, J. & Sarkadi, Á. (2010). ‘The dynamics of language learning attitudes and motivation: Lessons from an interview study of dyslexic language learners’. Modern Language Journal, 94, 470-84.
    Dörnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. The modern language journal, 78(3), 273-284.
    Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivation and second language acquisition (Vol. 23). Natl Foreign Lg Resource Ctr.
    Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Dornyei, Z., Csizer, K., & Nemeth, N. (2006). Motivational dynamics, language attitudes and language globalisation: A Hungarian perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    Driscoll, D. L., Appiah-Yeboah, A., Salib, P., & Rupert, D. J. (2007). Merging qualitative and quantitative data in mixed methods research: How to and why not. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology (University of Georgia), 18.
    Fathman, A. (1975). The relationship between age and second language productive ability. Language learning, 25(2), 245-253.
    Fattig, M. L., & Taylor, M. T. (2008). Co-Teaching in the Differentiated Classroom: Successful Collaboration, Lesson Design, and Classroom Management, Grades 5-12. John Wiley & Sons.
    Fengying, M. (2003). Motivating students by modifying evaluation methods. InEnglisch Teaching Forum (Vol. 41, p. 1).
    Fulbright English Teaching Assistant Program. (2014). Evaluation Report. Washington, DC: EurekaFacts, LLC.
    Gagnon, M. (1974). Quelques facteurs déterminant l‘attitude vis-à-vis l‘anglais, language seconde. In R. Darnell (Ed.), Linguistic diversity in Canadian society, 2. Edmonton: Linguistic Research.
    Gardner, R. C. (1960). Motivational variables in second-language acquisition. PhD Thesis: McGill University.

    Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social Psychology and Second Language Learning: The Role of Attitudes and Motivation. Edward Arnold.
    Gardner, R. C. (2008). Individual differences in second and foreign language learning. In Encyclopedia of Language and Education (pp. 1135-1146). Springer US.
    Gardner, R. C. (2010). Motivation and second language acquisition: The socio-educational model (Vol. 10). Peter Lang.
    Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1959). Motivational variables in second-language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 13(4), 266.
    Gardner, R. C., Masgoret, A. M., & Tremblay, P. F. (1999). Home background characteristics and second language learning. Journal of language and social psychology, 18(4), 419-437.
    Gardner R. C. & Smythe, P.C. (1975). Second language acquisition. A social psychological approach. Research Bulletin, 332. Department of Psychology. London, Canada: University of Western Ontario.
    Garland, R. (1991). The mid-point on a rating scale: Is it desirable. Marketing bulletin, 2(1), 66-70.
    Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 11(3), 255-274.
    Hashwani, M. S. (2008). Students’ attitudes, motivation and anxiety towards English language learning. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 2(2).
    Hersh, R. (2007). Terms of engagement. Peer Review, 9(3) 30-31. Retrieved August 12, 2008, from http://www.aacu.org/peerreview/pr-su07/documents/pr-su07_reality.pdf
    Hitchcock, G., & Hughes, D. (1989). Research and the teacher: A qualitative introduction to school-based research. London: Routledge.
    Huang, F. C. (2011). English co-teaching in elementary school: A case study of the English co-teaching program in Kaohsiung city. Unpublished Doctor’s Dissertation. National Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan.
    Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. Sociolinguistics, 269293, 269-293.

    Jakobovits, L. A. (1970). Foreign Language Learning; A Psycholinguistic Analysis of the Issues.
    Jeon, M., & Lee, J. (2006). Hiring native-speaking English teachers in East Asian countries. English Today, 22(04), 53-58.
    Kormos, J., & Csizér, K. (2008). Age‐related differences in the motivation of learning English as a foreign language: Attitudes, selves, and motivated learning behavior. Language Learning, 58(2), 327-355.
    Kormos, J., Kiddle, T., & Csizér, K. (2011). Systems of goals, attitudes, and self-related beliefs in second-language-learning motivation. Applied Linguistics, 32(5), 495-516.
    Krashen, S. D. (1987). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall International.
    Krashen, S. (1991). The input hypothesis: An update. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University round the table on languages and linguistics 1991: Linguistics and language pedagogy: The state of the art (pp. 409-431). Washington, D. C: Georgetown University Press.
    Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom.
    Krosnick, J. A., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2005). The measurement of attitudes. The handbook of attitudes, 21-76.
    Lam, Z. (1973). Contradictions of teaching rationale: Introduction to pedagogy. Merhavia: Hapoalim Publications (in Hebrew).
    Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2005). What do students think about the pros and cons of having a native speaker teacher?. In Non-native language teachers (pp. 217-241). Springer US.
    Lehmann, C. (2006). Motivation in language: Attempt at systematization. Retrieved from http://www.uni-erfurt.de/sprachwissenschaft/personal/lehmann/CLPubl/
    Llurda, E., & Huguet, N. (2003). Self-awareness in NNS EFL primary and secondary school teachers. Language Awareness, 12(3-4), 220-233.
    Luo, W. H. (2007). A study of native English-speaking teacher programs in elementary schools in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(2), 311-320.
    Ma, F., & Ping, L. (2012). Advantages and disadvantages of native‐and nonnative‐English‐speaking teachers: Student perceptions in Hong Kong. TESOL Quarterly, 46(2), 280-305.
    Mahboob, A. (2003). Status of non-native English-speaking teachers in the United States. Unpublished Master Degree Thesis. Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
    Masgoret, A., & Gardner, R. C. (2003). Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates. Language Learning, 53, 1, 123-163.
    McNamara, C. (1999). General guidelines for conducting interviews. Retrieved from http://www.mapnp.org/library/evaluatn/intrview.htm

    Medgyes, P. (1992). Native or non-native: who's worth more?. ELT journal, 46(4), 340-349.
    Medgyes, P. (1994). The Non-native Teacher. London: MacMillan.
    Melton, C. D. (1990). Bridging the cultural gap: A study of Chinese students' learning style preferences. RELC Journal, 21(1), 29-54.
    Montalvo, G. P. (1998). Pleasing the Teacher. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 58(8-A).
    Moussu, L. M. (2006). Native and Nonnative English-Speaking English as a Second Language Teachers: Student Attitudes, Teacher Self-Perceptions, and Intensive English Administrator Beliefs and Practices. Online Submission.

    Moussu, L. (2010). Influence of Teacher‐Contact Time and Other Variables on ESL Students' Attitudes Towards Native‐and Nonnative‐English‐Speaking Teachers. TESOL Quarterly, 44(4), 746-768.
    Muhammad Athar, H. (2011). Relationship Of Classroom Environment With Anxiety And Attitude Of Secondary School Students Towards The Learning Of English (Doctoral dissertation, International Islamic University, Islamabad).
    National Immigration Agency, MOI. Retrieved November 25, 2015 from https://www.immigration.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=29986&CtUnit=16677&BaseDSD=7&mp=2
    Noels, K. A. (2001). New orientations in language learning motivation: Towards a model of intrinsic, extrinsic, and integrative orientations and motivation. Motivation and second language acquisition, 23, 43-68.
    Nunan, D. (2003). The Impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific region. TESOL QUARTERLY, 37, 589-613.

    Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, inc.
    Pennycook, A. (2014). The cultural politics of English as an international language. Routledge.
    Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational research, 63(2), 167-199.
    Rao, Z. (2010). Chinese students' perceptions of native English-speaking teachers in EFL teaching. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 31(1), 55–68.
    Reid, J. M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL quarterly, 21(1), 87-111.
    Richard-Amato, P. A. (2010). Making it happen: From interactive to participatory language teaching: Evolving theory and practice. Pearson Education.
    Riley, P.A. (2008). Reform in English language teaching in Japan. Retrieved from http://opac.kanto-gakuin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/retrieve/sr_bookview.cgi/U_CHARSET.utf-8/NI20000267/Body/link/105-111.pdf
    Robens, S. (1977). Students' self-perception and their relation to teachers-parents. Ramat Gan: Hapoalim Publications (in Hebrew).
    Rossman, G. B., & Wilson, B. L. (1994). Numbers and words revisited: Being “shamelessly eclectic”. Quality and Quantity, 28(3), 315-327.
    Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar. Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching, 133-164.
    Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents’ motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 437-460.
    Samimy, K. K., & Brutt-Griffler, J. (1999). To be a native or non-native speaker: Perceptions of “non-native” students in a graduate TESOL program. Non-native educators in English language teaching, 127-144.
    Sandoval-Pineda, A. (2011). Attitude, Motivation and English Language Learning in a Mexican College Context.
    Saville-Troike, M. (2006). Introducing second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Schmidt, R., Borai, D. & Kassabgy, O. (1996). Foreign language motivation: Internal structure and external connections. In Oxford, R. (Eds). Language learning motivation: Pathways to new century. Vol. 11, 9-70.
    Schmuck, R., & Schmuck, P. (1988). Group processes in the classroom. 15th Edition. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. Brown.
    Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323-332.
    Sook, K.J., & Norton. B. (2002). Language planning in Korea: The new elementary English program. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: critical issues (pp. 245-266). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Sparks, R., & Lipka, R. P. (1992). Characteristics of master teachers: Personality factors, self-concept, locus of control, and pupils’ control ideology. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 5, 303-311.
    Stansfield, C. W., & Winke, P. M. (2008). Testing aptitude for second language learning. In Encyclopedia of Language and Education (pp. 2226-2239). Springer US.
    Stewart, V. (2007). Becoming citizens of the world.
    Storey, P., Luk, J., Gray, J., Wang-Kho, E., Lin, A. & Berry, R.S.Y. (2001). Monitoring and evaluation of the native-speaking English teacher scheme. Unpublished Research Report. Hong Kong Institute of Education.
    Tajino, A., & Tajino, Y. (2000). Native and non-native: what can they offer? Lessons from team-teaching in Japan. ELT journal, 54(1), 3-11.
    Tarnopolsky, O. (2000). EFL Teaching and EFL Teachers in the Global Expansion of English. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 16(2), 25-42.
    Truscott, J. (1999). What's wrong with oral grammar correction. Canadian Modern Language Review, 55(4), 437-456.
    Vansteenkiste, M., Zhou, M., Lens, W., & Soenens, B. (2005). Experiences of autonomy and control among Chinese learners: Vitalizing or immobilizing?. Journal of educational psychology, 97(3), 468.
    VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input. Studies in second language acquisition, 12(03), 287-301.
    Vigil, N. A., & Oller, J. W. (1976). RULE FOSSILIZATION: A TENTATIVE MODEL1. Language learning, 26(2), 281-295.
    Walkinshaw, I., & Duong, O. T. H. (2012). Native- and non-native speaking English teachers in Vietnam: Weighing up the benefits. TESL-EJ, 16(3), 1-17.
    Weiss, R. S. (1995). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. Simon and Schuster.

    White, L. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second language research, 7(2), 133-161.
    Williams, M., & Burden, L. R. (1997). Psychology for Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press.
    Wisdom, J., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Mixed methods: Integrating quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis while studying patient-centered medical home models. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

    Young, T. J., & Walsh, S. (2010). Which English? Whose English? An investigation of ‘non-native’teachers' beliefs about target varieties. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 23(2), 123-137.
    Zandvliet, D. B., & Fraser, B. J. (2005). Physical and psychosocial environments associated with networked classrooms. Learning Environments Research, 8(1), 1-17.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE