本研究旨在探討依據表現提供回饋於動作表現與學習的效應。實驗一延續過去自我控制回饋研究發現，在非自我控制條件下對於誤差方向判斷錯誤的試作提供結果獲知，檢驗對於動作學習的效應；實驗二檢驗自我控制回饋的練習條件下檢驗安排寬帶回饋在動作表現與學習的效應。兩個實驗各招募24名成年人為實驗參與者 (實驗一16名男性，8名女性，平均年齡24.6 ± 2.2歲；實驗二18名男性，6名女性，平均年齡23.7 ± 1.9歲)，以滑塊推滑 (puck-shuffling) 的力量控制動作為實驗工作。結果發現在非自我控制回饋的情境中於針對誤差方向判斷錯誤的試作提供回饋，並沒有產生動作表現與學習作用，而在自我控制條件下結合寬帶回饋則對於動作學習穩定度則有正面效益。誤差判斷錯誤的試作的實際動作表現較判斷正確的試作準確，且主觀估計的動作表現亦低於誤差判斷正確的試作準確；在自我控制的情境中，學習者要求回饋的試作動作表現較不要求回饋的試作準確，對於練習過程中的限制學習者可能採取自我調節學習策略。透過比對主觀與客觀動作表現誤差結果發現，學習者對於自我表現具有高估的現象。

This study was designed to examine effects of motor performance and learning, based on performance-based feedback schedules. In experiment 1, by extending the findings of self-controlled feedback, feedback was provided while learners made wrong judgment of error direction in a non-self-controlled condition, which examined the effect of motor learning. Experiment 2 examined the effects of motor performance and learning by adding bandwidth feedback in self-controlled context. Both of two experiments of the present study recruited twenty-four adults as participants respectively (Experiment 1: 16 males, 8 females, mean age: 24.6 ± 2.2 yrs.; Experiment 2: 18 males, 6 females, mean age: 23.7 ± 1.9 yrs.). The two experiments adopted a force control puck-shuffling movement as experimental task. The results revealed that providing feedback for trials that learners made wrong judgment of error direction did not result in the effects of motor performance and learning in a non-self-controlled feedback condition. Combining bandwidth feedback in self-controlled condition resulted in motor learning benefits in stability. The actual motor performance and subjectively estimated motor performance of trials that learners could not correctly judge the direction of error was more accurate than the trials that learners made judgment correctly; The motor performance of trials that learners requested feedback was more accurate than the ones that they did not request in self-controlled condition. Learners might adopted self-regulated learning strategies to cope the constraints they suffered in learning process. By comparing the subjective error and objective error of motor performance, the results indicated that learners tended to over-estimated their performance.

中文部分

方正銘、卓俊伶 (2008)。動作表現與學習的帶寬回饋及年齡效應。臺灣運動心
理學報，13，21-38。

李淑華、林靜兒 (2013)。自我控制回饋促進動作技能學習之因素。中華體育季
刊，27，335-342。

吳詩薇、張至滿、卓俊伶、蔡銘仁 (2016)。摘要結果獲知的時近訊息有利於自
我控制學習。大專體育學刊，18，14-26。

林尚武、卓俊伶、楊梓楣、陳重佑、葉俊良 (2009)。自發性錯誤估計促進自我
控制回饋的動作學習效益。體育學報，42，15-28.

胡名霞 (2009)。動作控制與動作學習。臺北市：金名。

張智惠、卓俊伶 (1998)。不同情境干擾對自我配速動作空間準確性及錯誤偵查
能力學習的影響。體育學報，7，209-218。

張櫻玉、卓俊伶 (2003)。錯誤估計與結果獲知對空間移動性動作表現與學習的
影響。臺灣運動心理學報，2，77-92。

陳玉芬、卓俊伶 (1998)。特定範圍結果獲知對高爾夫推桿動作之空間準確性與
錯誤偵查的影響。體育學報，7，249-258。

葉俊良、卓俊伶、林靜兒、陳重佑 (2007)。自我控制回饋對空間性動作表現、
學習及錯誤估計的效應。大專體育學刊，9，23-35。

蔡銘仁、卓俊伶 (準備中a)。Better performance results in feedback requests.

蔡銘仁、卓俊伶 (準備中b)。Feedback provided within the learners-regulated
bandwidth endorses motor learning effect of self-controlled feedback.

顧毓群 (1989)。閉鎖環動作學習理論之評析。中華體育季刊，2，25-31。

西文部分

Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor
Behavior, 3, 111-150.

Adams, J. A., & Goetz, E. T. (1973). Feedback and practice as variables in error
detection and correction. Journal of Motor Behavior, 5, 217-224.

Ahmadi, P., Sabiz, A. H., Heirani, A., & Hasanvand, B. (2011). The effect of feedback
after good, poor, good-poor trials, and self-control conditions in an
acquisition and learning of force production task. Physical Education and
Sport, 9, 35-43.

Aiken, C. A., Fairbrother, J. T., & Post, P. G. (2012). The effects of self-controlled
video feedback on the learning of the basketball set shot. Frontiers in
Psychology, 3, 1-8.

Alikhani, H., Gharaat, M. A., Naghdi, G. N., Abarghni, L. E., & Alikhani, M. (2013).
Effect of error detection and time of decision making for request feedback in
self-controlled conditions acquisition and retention of a complex task. Annals
of Biological Research, 4, 22-29.

Anderson, D. I., Magill, R. A., & Sekiya, H. (2001). Motor learning as a function of
KR schedule and charateristics of task-intrinsic feedback. Journal of Motor
Behavior, 33, 59-66.

Andrieux, M., Danna, J., Thon, B. (2012). Self-control of task difficulty during
training enhances motor learning of a complex coincidence-anticipation task.
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83, 27-35.

Annett, J. (1969). Feedback and human behavior. Middlesex, England: Penguin.

Ávila, L. T. G., Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Positive
social-comparative feedback enhances motor learning in children. Psychology
of Sport and Exercise, 13, 849-853.

Badami, R., VaezMousavi, M., Wulf, G., & Namazizadeh, M. (2011). Feedback after
good versus poor trials affects intrinsic motivation. Research Quarterly for
Exercise and Sport, 82, 360-364.

Badami, R., VaezMousavi, M., Wulf, G., & Namazizadeh, M. (2012). Feedback about
more accurate versus less accurate trials: Differential effects on
self-confidence and activation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83,
196-203.

Badets, A., & Blandin, Y. (2004). The role of knowledge of results frequency in
learning through observation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 62-70.

Badets, A., & Blandin, Y. (2005). Observational learning: Effects of bandwidth
knowledge of results. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37, 211-216.

Badets, A., Blandin, Y., Wright, D. L., & Shea, C. H. (2006). Error detection processes
during observational learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 77,
177-184.

Bagherli, J., Mohsenzadeh, M., Sabzi, A. H., & Fotrousi, F. (2013). Bandwidth
feedback: Does it effective when provided near or far from target on learning
of putting skill? Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 13, 1-4.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and actions: A social cognitive
theory. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology.
Cambridge: Cambridge University.

Bilodeau, E. A., & Bilodeau, I. M. (1985). Variable frequency knowledge of results
and the learning of simple skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55,
379-383.

Braten, I. (1991). Vygotsky as precursor to metacogntive theory: I. The concept of
metacogntion and its roots. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,
35, 179-192.

Broujeni, E. P., Shojaei, M., & Daneshfar, A. (2014). Effects of feedback after
successful trials, normative feedback, and self-controlled feedback on learning
of badminton service. International Journal of Sport Studies, 4, 823-829.

Bruechert, L., Lai, Q., & Shea, C. H. (2003). Reduced knowledge of results frequency
enhances error detection. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74,
467-472.

Butler, M. S., Reeve, T. G., & Fischman, M. G. (1996). Effects of the instructional set
in the bandwidth feedback paradigm on motor skill acquisition. Research
Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67, 355-359.

Carpenter, S. (2001). A blind spot in motor learning. Monitor on Psychology, 32, 1-5.

Carter, M. J., & Patterson, J. T. (2012). Self-controlled knowledge of results:
Age-related differences in motor learning, strategies, and error detection.
Human Movement Science, 31, 1459-1472.

Carter, M. J., Smith, V., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2016). Judgments of learning are
significantly higher following feedback on relatively good versus relatively
poor trials despite no actual learning differences. Human Movement Science,
45, 63-70.

Cauraugh, J. H., Chen, D., & Radlo, S. J. (1993). Effects of traditional and reversed
bandwidth knowledge of results on motor learning. Research Quarterly for
Exercise and Sport, 64, 413-417.

Chen, D. D., Hendrick, J. L., & Lidor, R. (2002). Enhancing self-controlled learning
environment: The use of self-regulated feedback information. Journal of
Human Movement Studies, 43, 69-86.

Chen, D., & Singer, R. N. (1992). Self-regulation and cognitive strategies in sport
participation. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 23, 277-300.

Chiviacowsky, S. (2014). Self-controlled practice: Autonomy protects perceptions of
competence and enhances motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise,
15, 505-510.

Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2002). Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance
learning because performers get feedback when they need it? Research
Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73, 408-415.

Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2005). Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is
based on the learners’ performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and
Sport, 76, 42-48.

Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2007). Feedback after good trials enhances learning.
Research Quarterly Exercise and Sport, 78, 40-47.

Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Self-controlled learning: The
importance of protecting perceptions of competence. Frontiers in Psychology,
3, 1-8.

Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Mederiros, F. L., Kaefer, A., & Tani, G. (2008). Learning
benefits of self-controlled knowledge of results in 10-year-old children.
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79, 405-410.

Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Mederios, F., Kaefer, A., & Wally, R. (2008).
Self-controlled feedback in children: Higher feeddback frequencies enhance learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79, 122-127.

Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Wally, R., & Borges, T. (2009). Knowledge of results
after good trials enhances learning in older adults. Research Quarterly for
Exercise and Sport, 80, 663-668.

Coca-Ugrinowitsch, A. A., & Ugrinowitsch, H. (2014). Bandwidth knowledge of
results on the learning of the saloon dart throwing task. Perceptual and Motor
Skills, 118, 462-474.

Dail, T. K., & Christina, R. W. (2004). Distribution of practice and metacognition in
learning and long-term retention of a discrete motor task. Research Quarterly
for Exercise and Sport, 75, 148-155.

Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of external mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105-115.

Deci, E. L. (1972). Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement, and inequity. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 113-120.

Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. N. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in
human behavior. NY: Plenum Press.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. N. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human
needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11,
227-268.

Fairbrother, J. T., Laughlin, D. D., & Nguyen, T. V. (2012). Self-controlled feedback
facilitates motor learning in both high and low activity individuals. Frontiers
in Psychology, 31, 1-7.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of
cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.

Fogarty, G., & Else, D. (2005). Performance calibration in sport: Implications for
self-confidence and metacognition biases. International Journal of Sport and
Exercise Psychology, 3, 41-57.

Goodwin, J. E., Meeuwsen, H. J. (1995). Using bandwidth knowledge of results to
alter relative frequencies during motor skill acquisition. Research Quarterly
for Exercise and Sport, 66, 99-104.

Green, S., & Sherwood, D. E. (2000). The benefits of random variable practice for
accuracy and temporal error detection in a rapid aiming task. Research
Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 398-402.

Guadagnoli, M. A., & Kohl, R. M. (2001). Knowledge of results for motor learning:
Relationship between error estimation and knowledge of results frequency.
Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 217-224.

Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 212-224.
Hadadi, N., & Kheirjoo, E. (2012). European Journal of Experimental Biology, 2,
1193-1199.

Hartman, J. M. (2007). Self-controlled use of a perceived physical assistance device during a balancing task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104, 1005-1016.

Hansen, S., Pfeiffer, J., & Patterson, J. D. (2011). Self-control of feedback during motor learning: Accounting for the absolute amount of feedback using a yoked group with self-control over feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior, 43, 113-119.

Hogan, J. C., & Yanowitz, B. A. (1978). The role of verbal estimates of movement
error in ballistic skill acquisition. Journal of Motor Behavior, 10, 133-138.

Hooyman, A., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2014). Impacts of autonomy-supportive
versus controlling instructional language on motor learning. Human Movement
Science, 36, 190-198.

Inzlicht, M., Legault, L., Teper, R. (2014). Exploring the mechanisms of self-control
improvement. Current Directions in Psychology Science, 23, 302-307.

Ishikura, I. (2008). Reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results without visual
feedback in learning a golf-putting task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106,
225-233.

Janelle, C. M., Barba, D. A., Frehlich, S. G., Tannant, L. K., & Cauraugh, J. H. (1997). Maximizing performance feedback effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 269-279.

Janelle, C. M., Kim, J., & Singer, R. N. (1995). Subject-controlled performance
feedback and learning of a closed motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81,
1627-634.

Kaefer, A., Chiviacowsky, S., Meira, C. M., & Tani, G. (2014). Self-controlled
practice enhances motor learning in introverts and extroverts. Research
Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 85, 226-233.

Keetch, K. M., & Lee, T. D. (2007). The effect of self-regulated and
experimenter-imposed practice schedules on motor learning for tasks of
varying difficulty. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78, 476-486.

Lai, Q., & Shea, C. H. (1999). Bandwidth knowledge of results enhances generalized
motor program learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70,
79-83.

Lai, Q., & Shea, C. H. (1999). The role of reduced frequency of knowledge of results
during constant practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and sport, 70,
33-40.

Lashley, K. S. (1917). The accuracy of movement in the absence of excitation from
the moving organ. American Journal of Physiology, 43, 169-194.

Lee, T. D., & Carnahan, H. (1990). Bandwidth knowledge of results and motor
learning: More than just a relative frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of
Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 42,
777-789.

Lee, T. D., & Maraj, B. K. V. (1994). Effects of bandwidth goals and bandwidth
knowledge of results on motor learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and
Sport, 65, 244-249.

Lee, T. D., Swinnen, S. P., & Serrien, D. J. (1994). Cognitive effort and motor
learning. Quest, 46, 328-344.

Lee, T. D., White, M. A., & Carnahan, H. (1990). The role of knowlwdge of results in
motor learning: Exploring the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 191-208.
Lee, T. D., & Wishart, L. R. (2005). Motor learning conundrums and possible
solutions. Quest, 57, 67-78.

Lewthwaite, R., Chiviacowsky, S., Drews, R., & Wulf, G. (2015). Choose to move:
The motivational impact of autonomy support on motor learning.
Psychoonomic Bulletin and Review, 22, 1383-1388.

Lewthwaite, R., & Wulf, G. (2010). Social-comparative feedback affects motor skill
learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 738-749.

Lui, J., & Wrisberg, C. A. (1997). The effect of knowledge of results delay and
subjective estimation of movement form on the acquisition and retention of a
motor skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 145-151.

MaRae, M., Patterson, J. D., & Hansen, S. (2015). Examining the preferred self-controlled KR schedules on learners and peers during motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 47, 527-534.

Magill, R. A., & Anderson, D. I. (2012). The roles and uses of augmented feedback in motor skill acquisition. In N. J. Hodges & A. M. Williams (Eds). Skill acquisition- Research, theory and practice (2nd ed) (pp.3-21.). New York: Routledge.

Magill, R. A. (1994). The influence of augmented feedback on skill learning depends on characteristics of the skill and the learner. Quest, 46, 314-327.

Magill, R. A. (2011). Motor learning and control: Concepts and applications. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Magill, R. A., Chamberlin, C. J., & Hall, K. G. (1991). Verbal knowledge of result as
redundant information for learning an anticipation timing task. Human Movement Science, 10, 485-507.

Magill, R. A., & Wood, C. (1986). Knowledge of results precision as a learning in
motor skill acquisition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 57,
170-173.

Marteniuk, R. G. (1976). Information processing in motor skills. New York: Holt,
Rinehart, & Winston.

Medin, D. L., Ross, B. N., & Markman, A. B. (2004). Cognitive psychology (4th ed.).
New Jersey: Wiley and Sons.

Memmert, D. (2006). Self-controlled practice of decision-making skills. Perceptual
and Motor Skills, 103, 879-882.
Park, J. H., Shea, C. H., & Wright, D. L. (2000). Reduced-frequency concurrent and
terminal feedback: A test a guidance hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior,
32, 287-296.

Patterson, J. T., & Azizieh, J. (2012). Knowing the good from bad: Does being aware
of KR content matter? Human Movement Science, 31, 1449-1458.

Patterson, J. T., & Carter, M. (2010). Learner regulated knowledge of results during
the acquisition of multiple timing goals. Human Movement Science, 29,
214-227.

Patterson, J. T., Carter, M., & Sanli, E. (2011). Decreasing the proportion of
self-control trials during the acquisition period does not compromise the
learning advantages in a self-controlled context. Research Quarterly for
Exercise and Sport, 82, 624-633.

Patterson, J. T., & Lee, T. D. (2010). Self-regulated frequency of augmented
information in skill learning. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,
64, 33-40.

Pintrich, P. B. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M.
Boekaert, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regualtion (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of
intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American
Psychologist, 55, 68-78.

Sadowski, J., Mastaler, A., Niznikowski, T. (2013). Benefits of bandwidth feedback in
learning a complex gymnastic skill. Journal of Human Kinetics, 37, 183-193.

Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and
motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95,
355-38.

Sanli, E. A., & Patterson, J. T. (2013). Learning effects of self-controlled practice
scheduling for children and adults: Are the advantages different? Perceptual
and Motor Skills, 116, 741-749.

Sanli, E. A., Patterson, J. T., Bray, S. R., & Lee, T. D. (2012). Understanding
self-controlled motor learning protocols through the self-determination theory.
Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1-17.

Sadowski, J., Mastalerz, A., & Niznikowski, T. (2013). Benefits of bandwidth
feedback in learning a complex gymnastic skill. Journal of Human Kinetics,
37, 183-193.

Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning.
Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.

Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence
and interpretations. In J. Requin & G. E. Stelmach (Eds.). Tutorials in motor
neuroscience (pp. 59-75). Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer.

Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A., (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common
principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training.
Psychological Science, 3, 207-217.

Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2011). Motor control and learning: A behavioral
emphasis (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Schmidt, R. A., & White, J. L. (1972). Evidence for an error detection mechanism in
motor skills: A test of Adams’ closed-loop theory. Journal of Motor Behavior,
4, 143-153.

Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (1973). Further tests of adams’ closed-loop theory:
Response-produced feedback and the error detection mechanism. Journal of
Motor Behavior, 5, 155-164.

Schmidt, R. A., Young, D. E., Shapiro, D. C., & Swinnen, S. (1989). Summary
knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15,
352-359.

Schunk, D. H. (2005). Self-regulated learning: The educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Eduactional Psychology, 40, 85-94.

Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education- Theory, research, and applications. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Motivation and self-regulated learning-
Theory, research, and applications. New York: Taylor & Francis.

Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition
retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Human Learning and Memory, 5, 179-187.

Simon, D. A., & Bjork, R. A. (2001). Metacognition in motor learning. Journal of
Experimental Psychology- Learning Memory and Cognition, 27, 907-912.

Simon, D. A., & Bjork, R. A. (2002). Models of performance in learning
multisegment movement tasks: Consequences for acquisition, retention, and
judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8,
222-232.

Sherwood, D. E. (1988). Effect of bandwidth knowledge of results on movement
consistency. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66, 535-542.

Sherwood, D. E. (2010). Detecting and correcting errors in rapid aiming movements:
Effects of movement time, distance, and velocity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 81, 300-309.

Sherwood, D. E., & Lee, D. T. (2003). Schema theory: Critical review and
implications for the role of cognition in a new theory of motor learning.
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 376-383.

Smith, P. J. K., Taylor, S. J., & Withers, K. (1997). Applying bandwidth feedback
scheduling to a golf shot. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68,
215-221.

Swinnen, S. P., Schmidt, R. A., Nicholson, D. E., & Shapiro, D. C. (1990).
Information feedback for skill acquisition: Instaneous knowledge of results
degrades learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,
and Cognition, 16, 706-716.
Thomas, J. R., Nelson, J. K., & Silverman, S. J. (2005). Research methods in physical
activity ( 6th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Tompson, C. E., & Wankel, L. M. (1980). The effects of perceived activity choice
upon frequency of exercise behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,
10, 436-443.

Tsai, M. J., & Jwo, H. (2015). Controlling the absloute frequency of feedback in a
self-controlled situation enhances motor learning. Perceptual and Motor
Skills, 121, 746-758.

Weeks, D. L., & Kordus, R. N. (1998). Relative frequency of knowledge of
performance and motor skill learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and
Sport, 69, 224-230.

Weeks, D. L., & Sherwood, D. E. (1994). A comparison of knowledge of results
scheduling methods for promoting motor skill acquisition and retention.
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65, 136-142.

Winstein, C. J. (1991). Knowledge of results and motor learning- Implications for
physical therapy. Physical Therapy, 71, 140-149.

Winstein, C. J, & Schmidt, R. A. (1990). Reduced relative frequency of knowledge of
results enhances motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 677-691.

Wright, D. L., Smith-Munyon, V. L., & Sidaway, B. (1997). How close is too close for
precise knowledge of results? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68,
172-176.

Wright, D. L., Snowden, S., & Willoughby, D. (1990). Summary KR: How much
information is used from the summary? Journal of Human Movement Studies,
19, 119-128.

Wulf, G., & Adams, N. (2014). Small choices can enhance balance learning. Human
Movement Science, 38, 235-240.

Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Cardozo, P. L. (2014). Additive benefits of autonomy
support and enhanced expectancies for motor learning. Human Movement
Science, 37, 12-20.

Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Lewthwaite, R. (2010). Normative feedback effects on
learning a timing task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 81,
425-431.

Wulf, G., Freitas, H. E., & Tandy, R. D. (2014). Choosing to exercise more: Small
choices increase exercise engagement. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15,
268-271.

Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2016). Optimizing performance through intrinsic
motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/c13423-015-0999-9.

Wulf, G., Raupach, M., & Pfeiffer, F. (2005). Self-controlled observational practice
enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76, 107-111.

Wulf, G., & Schmidt, R. A. (1989). The learning of generalized motor programs:
Reducing the relative frequency of knowledge of results enhances memory.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15,
748-757.

Wulf, G., Shea, C., & Lewthwaite, R. (2010). Motor skill learning and performance: A
review of influential factors. Medical Education, 44, 75-84.

Wulf, G., & Toole, T. (1999). Physical assistance devices in complex motor skill
learning: Benefits of a self-controlled practice schedule. Research Quarterly
for Exercise and Sport, 70, 265-272.

Yan, J. H., Thomas, J. R., & Thomas, K. T. (1998). Children’s age moderates the
effect of practice variability: A quantitative review. Research Quarterly for
Exercise and Sport, 69, 210-215.

Young, D. E., & Schmidt, R. A. (1992). Augmented feedback for enhanced skill
acquisition. In J. Requin & G. E. Stelmach (Eds.). Tutorials in motor
Behavior II (pp. 677-693). Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 64-70.